A tale of two bugzillas
Richard Li
richardl at redhat.com
Mon Feb 14 14:31:09 UTC 2005
Thanks, we'll get it fixed. BTW, there is a "Bugzilla" product inside
Bugzilla where you can file bugs ;-).
mbneto wrote:
>Looks great indeed.
>
>As a suggestion, if you reach the guy, remind him/her to add a
></body></html> to the template.
>
>- mb
>
>
>On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:10:43 -0400, Steven Garrity
><stevelist at silverorange.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 08:47 -0500, Toshio wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Are there any substantive differences between bugzilla.redhat.com and
>>>>bugzilla.redhat.com/beta? In particular, it looks like they are views
>>>>of the same data so it should be okay to enter information into either
>>>>one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It's the same database. /beta is the current devel one (and a lot nicer
>>>in a lot of ways) and should be becoming the main interface "real soon
>>>now"
>>>
>>>
>>Who has been doing the visual/UI customization in the new beta Bugzilla?
>>It looks great. I'd love to see if we could get this kind of
>>customization and integration into the Mozilla.org style for
>>bugzilla.mozilla.org
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Steven Garrity
>>
>>--
>>fedora-devel-list mailing list
>>fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
>>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list