RFC: Making the xfs font server optional in Fedora Core and its derivatives.
Adam Jackson
ajackson at redhat.com
Tue May 23 14:22:36 UTC 2006
Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Dimi Paun wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 01:16 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>> On the other hand, there are many applications included both
>>> in Fedora Core, and in Fedora Extras, which do rely on the
>>> core fonts system still, and are likely to rely on it for the
>>> forseeable future.
>>
>> Great to hear we're moving in this direction.
>> I guess the obvious question is "what will break?". Once we
>> have a clear idea what really depends on xfs (some packages, like
>> wine, _can_ work with xfs if it's the only available option, or
>> without), we can devise a plan of making xfs optional (moved to Extra
>> along with all apps that depend on it?).
>
> No apps[1] require xfs. Lots of apps require "core fonts"
> support. We currently provide core fonts support via the
> xfs font server, however the X server is equally capable
> of serving fonts on its own without a separate font server.
I assume the [1] here was meant to point to a footnote about various
very-low-level tools that do know how to explicitly talk to font
servers. It's not a large list: fslsfonts, fstobdf, mkcfm, showfont,
and xfsinfo from the Xorg app collection, and probably zero outside of that.
I'm of the opinion that leaving xfs enabled isn't really a big deal even
in RHEL, and that the correct fix is to fix the X server to use
fontconfig once and for all, rather than expose users to a needless
configuration change. I don't see the intermediate steps as being
worthwhile targets on their own.
- ajax
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list