libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 18:57:22 UTC 2008
Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Still we need to tackle this before it does become a bigger problem,
> sofar I've seen very little attention for this thread, which is sad as
> this is a *real* issue. So far only gkrellm seems to have been used by
> people who also use nss_ldap, but sooner or later slrn or one of the
> others will hit the same problem, and if more and more apps are moved to
> these openssl compat libs then the problem becomes really large!
>
+1
Especially since Fedora is supposed to drive adoption of nss and the nss
compat libs to aid in FIPS-140 compliance for downstream distros, this
problem will only get bigger.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080826/28655c77/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list