<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> seth vidal wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1107286612.25100.123.camel@cutter" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Which part of the users would this be? The people using fedora in 'mission critical environments'? I coulda sworn there was something about fedora core not be intended for those environments on the front page. Maybe I'm mistaken - but why are we planning and making adjustments for folks that the distro is EXPLICITLY not intended for? -sv </pre> </blockquote> I agree. Fedora should follow its purposes. RPM Changelogs are important and should be supported for supported Fedora, maybe even the most recent entry into Fedora Legacy. Anyone upgrading from an ancient release expects to do a bit more research than `rpm -qi --changelog package`. Extremely historic Changelogs are a nuisance that just add noise to the important information-- what has changed since the last RPM. </body> </html>