<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2657.73"> <TITLE>RE: rawhide report: 20050310 changes</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> The main developers of DKMS are on the linux-poweredge at dell dot com mailing list. They would be able to help shed some light on this. Joe -----Original Message----- From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com [<A HREF="mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com">mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com</A>] On Behalf Of Jason L Tibbitts III Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:19 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20050310 changes >>>>> "RE" == Ralf Ertzinger <fedora-devel@camperquake.de> writes: RE> It would require to make the development package a requirement for RE> every install. Only if you use DKMS as is. But if you take it as a starting point (i.e. what Mr. Rugolsky suggested) and make its output not an installed module but a kernel-module-whatever RPM then end users wouldn't need the development packages. I guess the question is whether DKMS can be so modified and if so whether the result would be better than whatever other solutions people have come up with. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com <A HREF="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" TARGET="_blank">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</A> </BODY> </HTML>