<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Yes, it was compiled with disklabel...<br>
<br>
Peter Arremann wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid200507051742.25856.loony@loonybin.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tuesday 05 July 2005 15:11, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Excuses, I just wrote that wrong:
/dev/hdd1 /Solaris ufs ufstype=sunx86,ro 0 0
That's what I get:
[root@200-185-243-180 casimiro]# !mount
mount -vat ufs
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd1,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
And then, with dmesg | tail:
[root@200-185-243-180 casimiro]# dmesg | tail
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven).
lp0: console ready
application mozilla-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
application firefox-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
application mplayer uses obsolete OSS audio interface
application mozilla-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
application skype uses obsolete OSS audio interface
application firefox-bin uses obsolete OSS audio interface
ufs_read_super: bad magic number
So, it seems that something is wrong with ufs driver.
Regards,
Casimiro
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Sorry if I missed it before but could you post the partition informiation
listed by Linux at bootup? You have sun disklabel support compiled into the
kernel, right?
Peter.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>