<div>On 9/12/05, Philip Prindeville <<a href="mailto:philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com">philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Sorry for missing the August 29th deadline... Hopefully better late than never. While I agree that moving to separate packing of the X drivers is a good thing, I'm wondering if we don't need to release the X server (as Xorg or Xfree86 or whatever) as a separate entity as well, as in the case where additional functionality has been added to support new driver features, or the server API has changed internally. Just an observation. Would the X server proper, the Mesa and DRM/DRI drivers, etc. continue to be released as part of the "xorg-x11" (tout court) package? Or am I missing something?</blockquote><div> Everything is being split out into separate packages to make it easier to release updates to individual packages and to allow each package to devel at its own pace. This includes not only drivers but things such as mesa and other packages, libraries etc. More info can be found at the <a href="http://x.org">x.org</a> wiki covering the modularization here <a href="http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ModularizationProposal">http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ModularizationProposal</a> Pete </div></div>