Isn't Red Hat forking the accelerated GL community by working on AIGLX instead of Xgl? It seems like Xgl is to AIGLX as SELinux is to AppArmor. It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big tent and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for accelereated GL. Benjy <div>On 3/1/06, Rahul Sundaram <<a href="mailto:sundaram@fedoraproject.org">sundaram@fedoraproject.org</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Vitor Domingos wrote: > Is AIGLX going to appear on FC5? I've test it with ATI RADEON 7000, > with all the hacks that's on the wiki page, and it's too dam slow.... > Some of the pieces are already integrated. See the section on technical details for the current status. <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RenderingProject/aiglx">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RenderingProject/aiglx</a>. Since the features are not enabled by default, yet performance shouldnt be much of a concern for FC5. Reports with hardware details and benchmarks would be quite useful to fine tune it I guess. -- Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com"> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a> </blockquote></div>