<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=KOI8-R" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> On 2006.08.07 an update to ypbind for FC5 has appeared: "ypbind-1.19-1". After that, on 2006.08.21 a new update has been released: "ypbind-1.19-0.2". Because of "0.2 < 1" in release field, this update takes no effect with yum-automated updating etc. Bugzilla ticket for this is <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203361">#203361</a> It is already third precedent of such issues, see (now closed) <a href="http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/199247">#199247</a> and <a href="http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/199248">#199248</a> The strange situation for me is that this issue was fixed for "rawhide" only. After some amount of persistence just the binary "1.19-0.2" rpm for i386 has been removed (i.e. the update has been cancelled), but "1.19-0.2" is still present for ppc, x86_64 and SRPMS ... This situation confuses me a little. My doubts is: - Is it a right way to do such amount of my activity for this kind of bugs? - What user should do in such case: just ignore the update or to update manually (rpm --force) ? - Why I'm the only man who catch such kinds of bug? Whether other people see it too, or just think that it is not noteworthy? - Does anybody use ypbind at all? :)š If yes, what version now exactly? Regards, Dmitry Butskoy -------- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy">http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy</a> RHCE </body> </html>