<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Please unsubscribe me...</DIV> <DIV>I forgot my password and can't do it myself...</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks.</DIV> <DIV> Re: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>----- Original Message ----- <DIV>From: <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com</A>></DIV> <DIV>To: <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>></DIV> <DIV>Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:42 AM</DIV> <DIV>Subject: fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51</DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV>> Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to > <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > <A href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</A> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com</A> > > You can reach the person managing the list at > <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list-owner@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list-owner@redhat.com</A> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. ctrl-c during boot != good (Dax Kelson) > 2. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Bill Nottingham) > 3. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Richard Hughes) > 4. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Pete Graner) > 5. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Ian Burrell) > 6. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel) > 7. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Chris Adams) > 8. Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes (Clyde E. Kunkel) > 9. undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' (Orion Poplawski) > 10. Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date (Thomas M Steenholdt) > 11. Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes (Mike Chambers) > 12. Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. (Bojan Smojver) > 13. Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Peter Gordon) > 14. Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? (Mark Rosenstand) > 15. Re: ctrl-c during boot != good (Gilboa Davara) > 16. Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 > (Matt Domsch) > 17. Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 (Matt Domsch) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:32:40 -0600 > From: Dax Kelson <<A href="mailto:dax@gurulabs.com">dax@gurulabs.com</A>> > Subject: ctrl-c during boot != good > To: <A href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</A> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:1158946360.18703.24.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com">1158946360.18703.24.camel@mentorng.gurulabs.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain > > SysVinit-2.86-12 > ---------------- > * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <<A href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</A>> - 2.86-12 > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung > services (#184340) > > I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting > this wrong. > > You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. > Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This > is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can > screwup and stop the boot. > > I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during > bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards. > > Dax Kelson > Guru Labs > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:49:41 -0400 > From: Bill Nottingham <<A href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</A>> > Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good > To: Dax Kelson <<A href="mailto:dax@gurulabs.com">dax@gurulabs.com</A>> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:20060922174941.GA17495@nostromo.devel.redhat.com">20060922174941.GA17495@nostromo.devel.redhat.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Dax Kelson (<A href="mailto:dax@gurulabs.com">dax@gurulabs.com</A>) said: >> SysVinit-2.86-12 >> ---------------- >> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <<A href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</A>> - 2.86-12 >> - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung >> services (#184340) >> >> I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting >> this wrong. >> >> You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. >> Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands >> (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This >> is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can >> screwup and stop the boot. >> >> I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during >> bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards. > > We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press > ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt > rc.sysinit. > > Bill > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:52:14 +0100 > From: Richard Hughes <<A href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com">hughsient@gmail.com</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:1158947534.26902.1.camel@hughsie-laptop.localdomain">1158947534.26902.1.camel@hughsie-laptop.localdomain</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, <A href="mailto:buildsys@redhat.com">buildsys@redhat.com</A> wrote: >> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >> --------------------- >> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <<A href="mailto:alexl@redhat.com">alexl@redhat.com</A>> - 0.8.1-1.fc6 >> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed >> >> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >> ----------------------- >> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <<A href="mailto:sgrubb@redhat.com">sgrubb@redhat.com</A>> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage > > Anyone else getting this: > > (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB > 00:09 > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > Trying other mirror. > (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB > 00:00 > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > > I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum > clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail. > > Known issue? Thanks. > > Richard. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:50:14 -0400 > From: Pete Graner <<A href="mailto:pgraner@redhat.com">pgraner@redhat.com</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: <A href="mailto:richard@hughsie.com">richard@hughsie.com</A>, Development discussions related to Fedora > Core <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:45143066.2060205@redhat.com">45143066.2060205@redhat.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, <A href="mailto:buildsys@redhat.com">buildsys@redhat.com</A> wrote: >>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> --------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <<A href="mailto:alexl@redhat.com">alexl@redhat.com</A>> - 0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed >>> >>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> ----------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <<A href="mailto:sgrubb@redhat.com">sgrubb@redhat.com</A>> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage >> >> Anyone else getting this: >> >> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB >> 00:09 >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >> Trying other mirror. >> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB >> 00:00 >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >> >> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum >> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail. >> >> Known issue? Thanks. >> >> Richard. >> >> > > Same here. Started last night. > > Pete > -- > Pete Graner email: <<A href="mailto:pgraner@redhat.com">pgraner@redhat.com</A>> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:38:44 -0700 > From: "Ian Burrell" <<A href="mailto:ianburrell@gmail.com">ianburrell@gmail.com</A>> > Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Message-ID: > <<A href="mailto:d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646@mail.gmail.com">d91f09cd0609221238x36beaa28yb184b6ebb8a9a646@mail.gmail.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 9/22/06, Thomas M Steenholdt <<A href="mailto:tmus@tmus.dk">tmus@tmus.dk</A>> wrote: >> >> It would be really nice if there were some good, universal and simple >> way to see how updated a site mirror is. >> >> One approach that I find to be working well is what debian is suggesting >> for their mirrors ( <A href="http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror">http://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror</A> ). Not only >> does this "trace method" provide info on when the mirror was last >> sync'ed, it also shows the "route" of the mirroring, i.e. what mirror >> this mirror mirrors from (confusing yet true :o)). >> >> Although this does not sort the actual problem of the stale mirrors, it >> will give people an easy way to monitor their own (local?) mirrors and >> perhaps even allow people to select a few often-updated near-by mirrors, >> instead of getting packages from a stale mirror across the ocean. >> > > It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. > If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is > out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle > of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync > --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic. > > - Ian > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:46:02 -0400 > From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <<A href="mailto:clydekunkel7734@cox.net">clydekunkel7734@cox.net</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: <A href="mailto:richard@hughsie.com">richard@hughsie.com</A>, Development discussions related to Fedora > Core <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:45143D7A.8000008@cox.net">45143D7A.8000008@cox.net</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Richard Hughes wrote: >> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 15:06 -0400, <A href="mailto:buildsys@redhat.com">buildsys@redhat.com</A> wrote: >>> gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> --------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alexander Larsson <<A href="mailto:alexl@redhat.com">alexl@redhat.com</A>> - 0.8.1-1.fc6 >>> - Update to 0.8.1, fixes a leak that caused files to not be closed >>> >>> hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> ----------------------- >>> * Wed Sep 20 2006 Steve Grubb <<A href="mailto:sgrubb@redhat.com">sgrubb@redhat.com</A>> 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.2 >>> - Apply patch correcting tmp file usage >> >> Anyone else getting this: >> >> (1/2): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jp 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB >> 00:09 >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >> Trying other mirror. >> (2/2): gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1. 100% |=========================| 42 kB >> 00:00 >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A>: [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum >> >> I've tried multiple times in the last few hours, and also tried "yum >> clean headers" and "yum clean metadata" to no avail. >> >> Known issue? Thanks. >> >> Richard. >> >> > > Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/</A> > > I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days: > > # rpm -Uvh > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A> > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A> > > then, yum update. > > WFM. > > -- > Regards, > > Old Fart > (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:09 -0500 > From: Chris Adams <<A href="mailto:cmadams@hiwaay.net">cmadams@hiwaay.net</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>>, <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:20060922195309.GD657887@hiwaay.net">20060922195309.GD657887@hiwaay.net</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <<A href="mailto:clydekunkel7734@cox.net">clydekunkel7734@cox.net</A>> said: >> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/</A> >> >> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days: >> >> # rpm -Uvh >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A> >> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A> > > It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my > mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those > two files), and I still get the same error. > -- > Chris Adams <<A href="mailto:cmadams@hiwaay.net">cmadams@hiwaay.net</A>> > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:54:42 -0400 > From: "Clyde E. Kunkel" <<A href="mailto:clydekunkel7734@cox.net">clydekunkel7734@cox.net</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060921 changes > To: Chris Adams <<A href="mailto:cmadams@hiwaay.net">cmadams@hiwaay.net</A>>, Development discussions related > to Fedora Core <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>>, > <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:45144D92.8020903@cox.net">45144D92.8020903@cox.net</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Clyde E. Kunkel <<A href="mailto:clydekunkel7734@cox.net">clydekunkel7734@cox.net</A>> said: >>> Some kind of problem between usually reliable mirrors and >>> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/</A> >>> >>> I used a method seen on one of these lists in the last couple of days: >>> >>> # rpm -Uvh >>> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A> >>> <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A> >> >> It appears to be a problem on the mirror master. I just verified my >> mirror is synced and up to the minute (including re-downloading those >> two files), and I still get the same error. > > Same here...so, > > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/</A> > > is not the mirror master? > > > -- > Regards, > > Old Fart > (my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:09:07 -0600 > From: Orion Poplawski <<A href="mailto:orion@cora.nwra.com">orion@cora.nwra.com</A>> > Subject: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' > To: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:ef1jdp$fqd$1@sea.gmane.org">ef1jdp$fqd$1@sea.gmane.org</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Just trying to build paraview against libOSMesa.so now that it's made > its return and am getting the following link errors: > > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to `is_selinux_enabled' > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to > `security_get_boolean_active' > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so: undefined reference to > `security_get_boolean_pending' > > This is against today's rawhide (mesa-libOSMesa-devel-6.5.1-3.fc6). > Need to explicitly link against -lselinux these days? Should libOSMesa > be linked against libselinux? > > /usr/lib64/libOSMesa.so.6.5.1: > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002aaaaaf53000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002aaaab1d6000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaab3f0000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000) > > > > -- > Orion Poplawski > System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 > NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane <A href="mailto:orion@cora.nwra.com">orion@cora.nwra.com</A> > Boulder, CO 80301 <A href="http://www.cora.nwra.com">http://www.cora.nwra.com</A> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:18:14 +0200 > From: Thomas M Steenholdt <<A href="mailto:tmus@tmus.dk">tmus@tmus.dk</A>> > Subject: Re: Keeping the Devel Mirrors Up-to-Date > To: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:ef1jum$hn7$1@sea.gmane.org">ef1jum$hn7$1@sea.gmane.org</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Ian Burrell wrote: >> >> It is fairly simple to compare the timestamps in the repomd.xml files. >> If the timestamps are older than the master, then the mirror is >> out-of-date. This doesn't help with mirrors which are in the middle >> of syncing or had a failure. Mirrors could use the rsync >> --delay-updates option to make the updates more atomic. >> > > This does not provide the mirroring trace (which I think would be very > nice), it also says nothing about whether or not the rest of the files > have been mirrored or only the repomd.xml file. > > /Thomas > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:37:39 -0500 > From: Mike Chambers <<A href="mailto:mike@miketc.com">mike@miketc.com</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20060922 changes > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Cc: <A href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:1158961059.2552.1.camel@scrappy.miketc.com">1158961059.2552.1.camel@scrappy.miketc.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 07:39 -0400, <A href="mailto:buildsys@redhat.com">buildsys@redhat.com</A> wrote: > >> Updated Packages: > >> evolution-data-server-1.8.0-9.fc6 >> --------------------------------- >> * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes <<A href="mailto:mbarnes@redhat.com">mbarnes@redhat.com</A>> - 1.8.0-9.fc6 >> - Revise patch for RH bug #198935 (fix a crash reported in bug #207446). > > Evo-2.8.0-6 wasn't included in today's build? Guess tomorrow's or on a > people.redhat.com site until then? > > -- > Mike Chambers > Madisonville, KY > > "Sex is like air, it's not important unless your not getting any!" > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:53:04 +0000 (UTC) > From: Bojan Smojver <<A href="mailto:bojan@rexursive.com">bojan@rexursive.com</A>> > Subject: Re: rawhide: 20060921 - problems. > To: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:loom.20060922T234458-491@post.gmane.org">loom.20060922T234458-491@post.gmane.org</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Naoki <naoki <at> valuecommerce.com> writes: > >> Ahh, indeed the RH repo is fine : >> >> # rpm -Uvh > > Actually, it still isn't. You can force all kinds of things by using RPM > directly. Yum, however, will check packages checksum against what it has in its > primary.xml.gz file. For example, here are 3 packages from i386 repository: > > ------------------------------------- > 1a9e25cd7c81e1ce10e2b73dc47a35eed166a698 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm > 2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761 hal-0.5.7.1-3.fc6.i386.rpm > a7b7fd448a2960c355c039297b070fece73f7521 hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm > ------------------------------------- > > However, primary.xml.gz has: > > ------------------------------------- > <name>gsf-sharp</name> > <arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="0" ver="0.8.1" rel="1.fc6"/> > <checksum type="sha" > pkgid="YES">ffadfbeab23ac7ef2d252ae68930ca4283435129</checksum> > > <name>hal</name> > <arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="0" ver="0.5.7.1" rel="3.fc6"/> > <checksum type="sha" > pkgid="YES">2beb89a8a66dca72833334a83ef2ffc3d1262761</checksum> > > <name>hsqldb</name> > <arch>i386</arch> > <version epoch="1" ver="1.8.0.4" rel="3jpp.2"/> > <checksum type="sha" > pkgid="YES">e1131397f0919ff1d04c16b5fcb7be6b82891748</checksum> > ------------------------------------- > > Two of those three don't match the checksum and yum won't update them. Here are > the errors: > > ------------------------------------- > (5/38): hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3j 100% |=========================| 1.6 MB 00:10 > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/hsqldb-1.8.0.4-3jpp.2.i386.rpm</A>: > [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > Trying other mirror. > (16/38): gsf-sharp-0.8.1- 100% |=========================| 42 kB 00:00 > <A href="http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm">http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/gsf-sharp-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm</A>: > [Errno -1] Package does not match checksum > Trying other mirror. > ------------------------------------- > > -- > Bojan > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:10:35 -0700 > From: Peter Gordon <<A href="mailto:peter@thecodergeek.com">peter@thecodergeek.com</A>> > Subject: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:4514B3BB.8070801@thecodergeek.com">4514B3BB.8070801@thecodergeek.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello, all. > > I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd > since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX > doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few > SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else > that is malfunctioning. > > I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found > nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing > list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the > ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in > a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up. > > Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks. > -- > Peter Gordon (codergeek42) > GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: > DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 > My Blog: <A href="http://thecodergeek.com/blog/">http://thecodergeek.com/blog/</A> > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 251 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : <A href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c70902c/signature.bin">https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060922/2c70902c/signature.bin</A> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:40:47 +0200 > From: Mark Rosenstand <<A href="mailto:mark@borkware.net">mark@borkware.net</A>> > Subject: Re: Temporarily Disabling AIGLX? > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:1158990047.833.50.camel@mjollnir.borkware.net">1158990047.833.50.camel@mjollnir.borkware.net</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 21:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> Hello, all. >> >> I've not as of yet been able to get Compiz and AIGLX eye-candy working (odd >> since it was working nicely around the FC6T2 time frame). Because of this, AIGLX >> doesn't seem very useful to me, and as I've been having some issues with a few >> SDL/OpenGL apps, I'd like to disable it to test if it is AIGLX or something else >> that is malfunctioning. >> >> I looked through the radeon(4) and xorg.conf(5) man pages with Yelp and found >> nothing useful. A google search returned an earlier post from the X.org mailing >> list from Donnie Berkholz suggesting to add `Option "AIGLX" "off"` in the >> ServerFlags section of the xorg.conf file. Unfortunately, that just results in >> a hardlock when between when RHGB finishes and when GDM attempts to start up. >> >> Any suggestions would be most appreciated. Thanks. > > I don't think you need to disable it in the server - just either disable > the compositor in metacity, or in the case of compiz, don't launch it. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:18:27 +0300 > From: Gilboa Davara <<A href="mailto:gilboad@gmail.com">gilboad@gmail.com</A>> > Subject: Re: ctrl-c during boot != good > To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > <<A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A>> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:1158999507.19122.29.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost">1158999507.19122.29.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Dax Kelson (<A href="mailto:dax@gurulabs.com">dax@gurulabs.com</A>) said: >> > SysVinit-2.86-12 >> > ---------------- >> > * Thu Sep 21 2006 Bill Nottingham <<A href="mailto:notting@redhat.com">notting@redhat.com</A>> - 2.86-12 >> > - set controlling tty for /etc/rc so that ctrl-c can be passed to hung >> > services (#184340) >> > >> > I don't have the permission to read the bug, so I could be interpreting >> > this wrong. >> > >> > You do *not* want users to be able to press ctrl-c during boot up. >> > Otherwise they can completely fsck the starting of daemons or commands >> > (like remounting / rw), possibly causing a serious security breach. This >> > is also a disaster for a kiosk where random malicious joe blows can >> > screwup and stop the boot. >> > >> > I filed a bug circa 1997ish to fix the "can press control-c during >> > bootup" problem. Lets not go backwards. >> >> We have multiple requests from people who want to be able to press >> ctrl-c to stop hanging daemons. Note that you can *already* interrupt >> rc.sysinit. >> >> Bill >> > > I second Dax's comment. > Can you make it configurable? > > Gilboa > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:25 -0500 > From: Matt Domsch <<A href="mailto:Matt_Domsch@dell.com">Matt_Domsch@dell.com</A>> > Subject: Core x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 > To: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:20060923034225.A30049@humbolt.us.dell.com">20060923034225.A30049@humbolt.us.dell.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Fri Sep 22 22:20:06 CDT 2006 > > Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot > starting with FC6test2. See > <A href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires</A> for more > information, including the list of packages removed from the default > build chroot. > > Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 > starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details: > <A href="http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html">http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html</A> > > > Total packages: 1156 > Number failed to build: 46 > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 25 > Leaving: 21 > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) > > Of those expected to have worked... > Without a bug filed: 21 > ---------------------------------- > alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6 > am-utils-6.1.5-4 > compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-61 > compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4 > control-center-2.16.0-5.fc6 > file-roller-2.16.0-2.fc6 > gdb-6.5-8.fc6 > gnome-media-2.16.1-2.fc6 > grub-0.97-12 > gthumb-2.7.8-3.fc6 > jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 > jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1 > kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 > memtest86+-1.65-4.1 > nautilus-2.16.0-4.fc6 > rhythmbox-0.9.5-4.fc6 > syslinux-3.11-4 > totem-2.16.1-1.fc6 > valgrind-3.2.0-5 > xen-3.0.2-36 > yelp-2.16.0-3.fc6 > > With bugs filed: 0 > ---------------------------------- > > > Full logs at <A href="http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/">http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/</A> > > -- > Matt Domsch > Software Architect > Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & <A href="http://www.dell.com/linux">www.dell.com/linux</A> > Linux on Dell mailing lists @ <A href="http://lists.us.dell.com">http://lists.us.dell.com</A> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:42:34 -0500 > From: Matt Domsch <<A href="mailto:Matt_Domsch@dell.com">Matt_Domsch@dell.com</A>> > Subject: Core i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-09-23 > To: <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:20060923034234.A30067@humbolt.us.dell.com">20060923034234.A30067@humbolt.us.dell.com</A>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Fri Sep 22 22:22:23 CDT 2006 > > Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot > starting with FC6test2. See > <A href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires</A> for more > information, including the list of packages removed from the default > build chroot. > > Note: You will need to rebuild your packages in Fedora Extras for FC6 > starting August 28, 2006. See here for more details: > <A href="http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html">http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00160.html</A> > > > Total packages: 1157 > Number failed to build: 15 > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 10 > Leaving: 5 > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package) > > Of those expected to have worked... > Without a bug filed: 5 > ---------------------------------- > beagle-0.2.10-2.fc6 > jakarta-commons-codec-1.3-5jpp.1 > jakarta-commons-pool-1.3-3jpp.1 > kdesdk-3.5.4-2.fc6 > xorg-x11-drv-via-0.2.1-5 > > With bugs filed: 0 > ---------------------------------- > > > Full logs at <A href="http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/">http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/</A> > > -- > Matt Domsch > Software Architect > Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & <A href="http://www.dell.com/linux">www.dell.com/linux</A> > Linux on Dell mailing lists @ <A href="http://lists.us.dell.com">http://lists.us.dell.com</A> > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > <A href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</A> > <A href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</A> > > End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 51 > *************************************************</BODY></HTML>