<html><head><style type="text/css"></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:45:34AM +0200, Joachim Frieben wrote: >> > >> > I have been using "epiphany" as my default browser for more than 2 years, >> > and I really wonder why the standard "GNOME" web browser still isn't >> > installed as the default application. >> >> When all this Iceweasel debate exploded, I decided to give Epiphany >> another shot. I've been using it as my default browser for the last >> three weeks now and I've been very impressed. It needs a few more >> extensions and I'll keep using Firefox for web developpement but >> Epiphany is much better integrated and easier to use than in the Gnome >> desktop than Firefox. >> >> +1 for me. +1 for me. > >As a long time Epiphany user I would love to see it as the default >browser, with the extensions pack you even get all the nice little >things like adblocking (okay currently not compiled by default but >that's an rpmbuild away) > >+1 from me as well +1 for me. > >> > No need to include "firefox" in the base install. It could (should) even be >> > moved to "extras" then. >> >> +1 again. > +1 for me. >Once XULRunner is ready firefox would just just another UI for the >engine, it could easily be moved to Extras. However as it stands right >now we need it in Core because half the desktop depends on it for gecko. > >-1 now, +1 post XULRunner > >- David > > </div></div> </div></div> <hr size=1> Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). <a href="http://ar.answers.yahoo.com">Probalo ya!</a> </body></html>