<div>On 4/4/07, Patrice Dumas <<a href="mailto:pertusus@free.fr">pertusus@free.fr</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > > LSB had just finished standardizing the init scripts and now we're > going to break things again. Users *are* going to complain. > Analysts *are* going to say Linux is fragmented. Microsoft *is* > going to publish studies saying that Linux has higher TCO because > of multiple init systems ;-) > > This doesn't mean there should be a single codebase. Multiple > systems could compete as long as they are 100% (or maybe just 99%) > compatible config files and user interface. All the init systems should be parallel installable, so the choice is only for the default init system. </blockquote><div> if we go this route system-config-services should support multiple backends.... </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list </a> </blockquote></div>