lol <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">No, new tools have to be backwards compatible else it breaks the entire toolchain that's been working for years. </blockquote><div> i will find a way to "fix" that issue.. perhaps using yum if the "good" way can`t resolve the dependency`s <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"> So if you admit you have little programming knowledge and not even a working prototype, can you PLEASE stop posting to this list.</blockquote><div> do i need to have c++ knowledge to make a prototype? yum isn`t written in c++ (or it wasn`t.. i dont really know there current coding state). i have alot of php knowledge and that will do fine for the moment but i`m also trying to learn c++ ^_^ <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">Then you are going to make yourself very unpopular.</blockquote><div> that`s mean... i need to start somewhere. and without feedback i`m not getting far. <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">To be honest, I think you need to read some source code of rpm and yum (and a good book on program design) before you start posting claims about a super fast depsolver.</blockquote><div> i didn`t exactly claim that i have the fastest dependency checker.. it was written as a question. but judging from all the feedback i got here i need to improve alot to make the timings more accurate compared to yum. but it`s still likely to be under 1 second for the mysql parsing. and i can look through the yum and rpm sources but that won`t do much good because i won`t understand 99% of it.. the other 1% is the include, print and if statement stuff ;) <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">Sorry if this sounds harsh.</blockquote><div> kinda.. you could just give me suggestions and help me out with the code. </div></div> </div> </div> </div> <div>2007/4/10, Richard Hughes <<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com"> hughsient@gmail.com</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:38 +0200, Mark wrote: > You could do that. But, do you really want your program coming > up with > different answers than the standard tools? > > if the "standard tools" are using logic that`s just no logic than yes > someone needs to make a change No, new tools have to be backwards compatible else it breaks the entire toolchain that's been working for years. > This isn't really a issue for fedora core development list, > well, until > you have a drop in replacement for yum (which might be a > little while > off I think). > > you can say that (last part) again... it could take a long while till > it`s done.. considering that i just know what pointers are in c++ and > besides the pointers i know a few other basics but nothing interesting > enough to be able to make this stuff in c++ and that`s the exact > reason why i`m first making it in php. So if you admit you have little programming knowledge and not even a working prototype, can you PLEASE stop posting to this list. > Not to be rude, but could you start a sourceforce project and > then get a > mailing list to discuss this sort of stuff in private? > > not for now. Then you are going to make yourself very unpopular. > This isn't really a issue for fedora core development list, > well, until > you have a drop in replacement for yum (which might be a > little while > off I think). > > Well i need to visions of the people here to make this stuff work so > that`s one reason why i posted it here. > i could make a sourceforge account and create a mailing list there but > it`s highly unlikely that i would have gotten as much feedback as i > get here. and in the end it`s all for fedora do why not post it here. > (perhaps the fedora-list would have been a better place) To be honest, I think you need to read some source code of rpm and yum (and a good book on program design) before you start posting claims about a super fast depsolver. Sorry if this sounds harsh. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a> </blockquote></div>