It's more apropriate to have differente package instead have on package for all. that could avoid to install unused files or make able to remove unused files. So this package should be named as follow: iwl-3945-firmware iwl-4945-firmware <div>2007/6/9, Jeremy Katz <<a href="mailto:katzj@redhat.com">katzj@redhat.com</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:54 +0200, dragoran wrote: > The iwlwifi-firmware package only contains the ucode image for iwl3945 > but not 4945. > should I file a bug against iwlwifi-firmware or should this be a > different package? > upstream calls them: > iwlwifi-3945-ucode > and > iwlwifi.4945-ucode Probably a different package. And now that F7's out the door, it's probably a good time to get the 3945 firmware package renamed for the devel tree. </blockquote><div> +1 </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">They just changed the naming upstream right before final freeze, so we wanted to put it off a smidge Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a> </blockquote></div> -- Xavier.t Lamien -- French Fedora Ambassador Fedora Extras Contributor GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB