2008/1/13, Jonathan Underwood <<a href="mailto:jonathan.underwood@gmail.com">jonathan.underwood@gmail.com</a>>:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <<a href="mailto:naheemzaffar@gmail.com">naheemzaffar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> I would expect different services to also cause some performance<br>> penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling
<br>> point for Fedora.<br>><br><br>This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux:<br><br><a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14">http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14</a><br><br>Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple
<br>file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am<br>misinterpretting the data given.<br><br>--<br>fedora-devel-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
</a><br><a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br>I have SELinux disabled because of many problems.<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek<br><a href="http://liviopl.jogger.pl/">http://liviopl.jogger.pl/</a>