Spam detection software, running on the system "biotite.ens.fr", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:03:36AM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
   > > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 15:42 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > I don't
   think anyone cares quite that much about agg anymore ;) > > > > I guess that
   the gnash maintainer in OLPC cares, maybe the former owner > > also cares
   (though it is not that clear). > > It appears gnash can use agg or cairo,
   but the developers prefer agg. Is > there a reason for this? (Apparently
  there's an OpenGL renderer too) > Everything else in the universe has been
   moving to cairo, why do we need > a duplicate project? I suppose its because
   agg is C++ and apparently so > is gnash. Still, bleh. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (6.7 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 4.0 HELO_LOCALHOST         HELO_LOCALHOST
 3.0 LIMSI_22               Sujet : Re abc abc
-0.5 SMILEY                 BODY: Contains one or more Smileys
 0.5 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.5000]
 2.5 LIMSI_C28              RAW: Groupe de 2 ou 3 lettres rété
-2.7 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list