<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Lennart Poettering <<a href="mailto:mzerqung@0pointer.de">mzerqung@0pointer.de</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">  <br>
</div>I haven't been following NM development lately. Just wondering: is<br>
there an option to explicitly select IPV4LL for configuring an IP<br>
address, instead of relying on dhcp-with-ipv4ll-fallback? <br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Lennart<br>
</font><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
--<br>
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.<br>
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net         ICQ# 11060553<br>
<a href="http://0pointer.net/lennart/" target="_blank">http://0pointer.net/lennart/</a>           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4<br>
<br>
--<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">fedora-devel-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a><br>
<a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">I think that is what actually Ubuntu people have, and I took it wrong because for DHCP and static IP addresses separate options are there. Rather than DHCP with IPv4LL fall back they search for devices capable with IPv4LL directly. Now it makes sense.<br>
<br>-- <br>Sunil Ghai