<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb: >>>>>> "JS" == Jochen Schmitt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jochen@herr-schmitt.de"><Jochen@herr-schmitt.de></a> writes: > > I think you mean "can take a long time". I have done re-reviews > for renames in an hour because someone asked me to. Typically a > re-review is much quicker than the initial review. > My last experience was, that the re-review has taken a long time. > As discussed on IRC, an important benefit of a re-review is the > insurance that the Obsoletes and Provides are done properly. It is > easy to get this wrong, so another pair of eyes in the process is > a good idea. I agree with you, I have propose a lightwight review for check this point in a bugzille ticket record as an insurance that this statements are right. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://enigmail.mozdev.org">http://enigmail.mozdev.org</a> iEYEARECAAYFAklKk3MACgkQT2AHK6txfgwhfACgixEK2QJULUFkw/qPlX6QkHLq WHQAoJSyBFQk/uwm0urjbsa3FIt/h8Yd =vmke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- </body> </html>