<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Yaakov Nemoy wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:7f692fec0812171239k2d7fe6a3w4b3e69da2f21c045@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">2008/12/17 Jochen Schmitt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jochen@herr-schmitt.de"><Jochen@herr-schmitt.de></a>: </pre> <pre wrap="">/boot is a 100-200 MB partition on many machines. </pre> </blockquote> <blockquote cite="mid:7f692fec0812171239k2d7fe6a3w4b3e69da2f21c045@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">...there's just no sense supporting /boot on anything other than a 100-200 MB ext2 or ext3 volume. </pre> </blockquote> Sorry... but that's just plain wrong. Maybe my use case is odd... but my /boot partition is a *MINIMUM* of 5GB on all of my computers. Why? 1.) I have a rescue image setup to boot if I need it... and 2.) I have a ghost image I made right after installing this version of fedora. I have no use for such a tiny /boot partition like you say you use. You need to keep in mind... that your use case is *NOT* the only one... or even an optimal one. Never ASSume anything... especially that which can be tainted by your own bias. Lyos Gemini Norezel </body> </html>