<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> On 04/22/2009 01:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:1240377190.20726.2.camel@localhost.localdomain" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 06:38 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">If you're serious about your signature, RH NDAs have to be considered irrelevant for Fedora. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> They are, however there is more going on at bugzilla.redhat.com than Fedora. </pre> </blockquote> I've seen the idea floated around about Fedora Project having it's own bug tracking setup before. I know that's a monumental task, but FP has done others and the change was worth it. For example, the original creation of Fedora Project was a great task, and I'm sure naysayers would have said it would have been impossible or unwise. Likewise, the unification of Core & Extras was also rather large, and netted great results. Fedora-specific bugs in Red Hat's bugzilla are already separated out by categorization, so it's theoretically possible to pull them all out into their own instance. Yes, there will be growing pains during the transition, but I think it fits very well with the ideals of Fedora. It's one of the last major tie-ins explicitly to Red Hat-specific infrastructure (another I can think of are the mailing lists, but even some of those are now under fedora* domains). </body> </html>