<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 04/22/2009 11:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1240413100.14173.708.camel@adam.local.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:16 +0800, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've seen the idea floated around about Fedora Project having it's own
bug tracking setup before. I know that's a monumental task, but FP
has done others and the change was worth it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Remember that a plausible case that doesn't involve Red Hat data -
not-yet-public security issues - was subsequently cited. Even if we
split Fedora bugzilla from Red Hat bugzilla, it'll still contain
sensitive data.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Bugzilla is currently publicly accessible anyway. How would the case
you've mentioned above affect this? What's hidden would remain hidden,
right? Maybe I'm not understanding...<br>
</body>
</html>