<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Martin Sourada <<a href="mailto:martin.sourada@gmail.com">martin.sourada@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 15:53 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > We could make odd releases with Gnome default and even releases KDE > default. That way, we can get a better distributed feedback. Right > now, I believe that there are more Gnome users out there just because > it is the default. New users don't mess with the defaults. > > Just an idea. > Orcan > </div>That springs out a question out of curiosity - how many people are actually using the DVD releases compared to our Live Spins? I mean, I don't see much pros in the DVD based spin (which isn't even live, so you cannot check if it will work before installation) and the other spins are pretty much 'decentralised' desktop-wise sans the fact that for most of Fedora, Desktop \approx GNOME (which means we have Desktop SIG that takes care of GNOME stuff and KDE SIG taking care of KDE, similarly Desktop Live spin being probably equal to what GNOME Live would be and KDE spin and XFCE spin and LXDE spin and ...). Martin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com">fedora-devel-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list</a> </blockquote></div> I haven't tried the live CD recently but the last time I tried installing the KDE live CD, the resulting image had some annoying oddities, I have used the DVDs since then. I think this is related to the fact that the live CD essentially "ghosts" the CD onto the hard drive (correct me if I'm wrong). -- Mark Bidewell <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell">http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell</a>