<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> drago01 wrote: <blockquote id="mid_f6ca9fed0905110807g4ce11663x12f3057a8cfdc18e_mail_gmail_com" cite="mid:f6ca9fed0905110807g4ce11663x12f3057a8cfdc18e@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Michael Nielsen <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mike@thetroubleshooters.dk"><mike@thetroubleshooters.dk></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote id="StationeryCiteGenerated_1" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hi, </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> </pre> <blockquote id="StationeryCiteGenerated_2" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">3. Mounts are also embedded into the user interface, rather than in the unix mount system, which means that the shares are not accessible for non-gui programs, for instance, I like to script most thing I do often, however, there is no way for scripts to get a hold of a drive that is mounted through the gui mount system (kde and gnome). </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> This is not true, in case of gnome you can access everything mounted by nautilus / gvfs by accessing ~/.gvfs works with ANY app. </pre> </blockquote> I was not aware of this, as it is not obvious, and poorly documented - I have searched for info on this, however I have noticed the mounts, when running the mount command, however it is not clear if the names remain consistent. And why make the mounts hidden ? ( leading . hides the directory), seems highly illogical approach. </body> </html>