<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <<a href="mailto:mrsam@courier-mta.com">mrsam@courier-mta.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Tom Lane writes:</span><br><span></span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>Mike McGrath <<a href="mailto:mmcgrath@redhat.com">mmcgrath@redhat.com</a>> writes:</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><span>breaks?</span><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.</span><br></div></blockquote><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);"><br></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);">Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. </span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);">--</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 35, 163);">Jes</span></div></body></html>