[Fedora-directory-devel] Is there any client interface for Linux other than pam_ldap?

[Richard Megginson]

Leroy Tennison wrote:

> The reason I ask is that the last time I looked at it I was 
> disappointed.  The features seemed limited and rudimentary.  You had 
> to configure the context in a local file and there was no way to 
> dynamically supply a different one.  If there is a more robust 
> alternative please let me know, I'd love to try it.  If not please 
> consider this an enhancement request - the greatest directory server 
> in the world isn't of great value if the client support is limited.  
> Thanks for any and all replies.

I don't know of any.  What are some of the features you would like to 
see in pam_ldap: the next generation?

>
> -- 
> Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
> Fedora-directory-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3178 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20060215/ddf99ca3/attachment.bin>