<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hello Noriko. This is great news about IPv6! About the binding, it sounds correct but I imagine a sysadmin would find it inconvenient, wanting to be able to listen on a single physical interface in a multihomed system but have both IP and IPv6 available. I guess they could bind LDAP to one and LDAPS to the other in a pinch. :) To try IPv6, do we need a DS build from the tip or just a new SDK? Ulf Noriko Hosoi wrote: <blockquote cite="mid450B14AF.7070409@redhat.com" type="cite">Hello, I'm testing listenhost using IPv6 address now. I put this configuration attribute in cn=config. nsslapd-listenhost: fe80::208:74ff:fe18:fcd5%eth0 And accessed the server using the IPv6 address as well as its IPv4 address. Here's the result: $ ./ldapsearch -h [fe80::208:74ff:fe38:fcd5] -p 12345 -b "dc=example,dc=com" "(objectclass=*)" dn dn: dc=example,dc=com $ ./ldapsearch -h 172.16.15.156 -p 12345 -b "dc=example,dc=com" "(objectclass=*)" dn ldap_simple_bind: Can't connect to the LDAP server - Connection refused I think this is the expected behavior, but I'd like to have your thoughts. Please note that if there is no nsslapd-listenhost specified, the both command lines return the same result "dn: dc=example,dc=com". Also, to someone who is curious, to run the same test, you need a new version of LDAP C SDK, which hasn't been released yet... Thanks, --noriko <pre wrap=""> <hr size="4" width="90%"> -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com">Fedora-directory-devel@redhat.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel</a> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>