<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Bill Bradford wrote: <blockquote cite="mid22197e1d050603100254e2c08@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On 6/3/05, David Boreham <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:david_list@boreham.org"><david_list@boreham.org></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Replication protocol compatibility with Sun isn't a supported or tested feature, but it should work provided Sun haven't changed their product to make it incompatible since the two codelines diverged. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Anyone know exactly what the differences are between Fedora DS and Sun's current offering? We just rolled out Sun's DS, but if I can get the exact same functionality out of FedoraDS, I may switch to that instead and save the $$$ licensing fee. </pre> </blockquote> Actually, after posting I remembered that there is some 'official' support for what's called migration from some version(s) of Sun DS. Migration does include support for progressive upgrade of replicated servers, which in turn implies support for inter-product replication. Someone else will need to say what the exact level of support is and which versions because I don't have that information to hand. Now, to answer your question the two products have essentially the same replication functionality. AFAIK DS7.1 has a superset of all Sun's current product replication functionality. </body> </html>