From chitlesh at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 16:20:38 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:20:38 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] geda 1.5.4 test packages Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909010920x21780166g951e54372bfd750b@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, gEDA-gaf's upstream will from now on produce one-big tarball instead of individual tarballs as it used to do in the past. This affects fedora's geda packages and packaging process. In accordance to Fedora packaging process the following tasks ought to be made: * file a new package review for gEDA-gaf * obsolete all existing fedora geda packages The challenge here is how to get users update their system flawlessly. I have produced test packages which I sincerely hope to receive some feedbacks as this will dictate the time taken before the next update will hit the stable repositories. For Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 users, please add to following to /etc/yum.repos.d/gedatest.repo # -------------- [gedatest] name=gEDA test - $releasever baseurl=http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gEDA/$releasever enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 # -------------- for fedora 10 users with: * 32 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.i386 --enablerepo=gedatest * 64 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.x86_64 --enablerepo=gedatest for fedora 11 users with: * 32 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.i586 --enablerepo=gedatest * 64 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.x86_64 --enablerepo=gedatest Looking forward for some feedbacks Cheers, Chitlesh From chitlesh at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 07:13:31 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:13:31 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] call for testing : gspiceui versus wxGTK 2.8 Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909030013y7ab0df13mab5f2a901f991a33@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, This is another call for testing. In response to ,[Bug 512076] Build with wxGTK-devel not compat-wxGTK26-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512076 gspiceui is now compiled under wxGTK 2.8 instead of the old wxGTK 2.6. Please kindly test and report any bug so that we can qualify gspiceui for FEL-12 livedvd. F-11 gspiceui package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130411 I would appreciate if from time to time you do # yum groupupdate 'Electronic Lab' --enablerepo=updates-testing kind regards, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 3 07:50:00 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:50:00 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #35: alliance 64 stability In-Reply-To: <066.79eba463bcc98ceeddc4cbe887f48833@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.79eba463bcc98ceeddc4cbe887f48833@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.f8be7a1c32d66475c1a989b62ba2c088@fedorahosted.org> #35: alliance 64 stability -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: digital design | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: alliance -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Upstream merged fedora patches and alliance was built for all fedora supported repositories -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Sun Sep 6 14:56:45 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 14:56:45 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #51: chalmers-lava2000 Message-ID: <069.011d20e256f8515a8c8833c7e0b876a8@fedorahosted.org> #51: chalmers-lava2000 -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: shakthimaan | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: FEL | Version: devel Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Package chalmers-lava2000, a Hardware Description Library written in Haskell. http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/chalmers- lava2000 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at gmail.com Mon Sep 7 06:36:29 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:36:29 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Call: Release Notes & groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' packages Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909062336j6c42634dp4c48267c11ede43d@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, We will enter F-12's Feature freeze and String freeze soon. I want * your notes to be included in Fedora 12's release notes. Please forward it to me as soon as possible as the Fedora Translation team requires enough time to translate it. * you to verify if the packages you maintain for electronics is listed on repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide -gl electronic-lab | sort All the names of the packages listed by its output , will be included into FEL's LiveDVD and available under yum groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' Cheers, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Sep 7 16:07:16 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:07:16 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.6c77ec52c93528def2df58320272ce15@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Comment (by shakthimaan): I had signed up for an evaulation copy, but, didn't get any link for the sources. From the .spec file: http://www.pragmatic-c.com/gpl-cver/downloads/gplcver-2.11a.src.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist. Where are the sources for this? -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Sep 7 16:22:48 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:22:48 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.9d747cbceab931dc593259bb358793dc@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Changes (by chitlesh): * type: defect => task Comment: You are right. Sounds like they removed it. Google points to http://www.sourcefiles.org/Scientific/Electronic/gplcver-2.11a.src.tar.bz2 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at gmail.com Mon Sep 7 19:07:42 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:07:42 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] html file to help SysAdmin choose CentOS or FEL Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909071207p43cc264bg4fec81b971bd754e@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, I have setup up a basic html page listing all FEL packages and their versions with respect to Fedora and CentOS. The reason behind this is to help a friend of mine choose where CentOS or Fedora is appropriate for his analog and characterisation team. Hence I've setup this page which I hope will migrate to our new website, currently under design by Fedora Design Team. The choice of Fedora or CentOS depends on the features and bug fixes on the EDA tools. But at the same time (Since we maintain those FEL packages for EPEL-5 repository), this html will also reflect the critical path in packaging for a particular design flow and which packages really needs to be updated or rebuilt. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html It was also once asked to publish a list of FEL packages. Well maintenance of that list is a blocker. This HTML generated automatically solves this issue. I've uploaded the sources of the scripts to our FEL git repository, however if someone can improve them it would be great :) This html file already provides enough qualitative information that satisfies many fields.From Spin maintainer to Ambassador. regards, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Sep 7 19:14:48 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:14:48 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #30: Paradigm Works Distributes ReleaseWorks As Free, Open Source Software In-Reply-To: <066.1427859dbfff4a8fcaebde5214bcd34b@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.1427859dbfff4a8fcaebde5214bcd34b@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.12e4287cea5e166f59edb700a177eff4@fedorahosted.org> #30: Paradigm Works Distributes ReleaseWorks As Free, Open Source Software -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: FEL | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Comment (by chitlesh): I have sent a mail to the president of Paradigm Works requesting a skype call. I wish to discuss collaboration with FEL and how to distribute ReleaseWorks, so that it is a win-win situation. Any one interested to join in? -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com Mon Sep 7 20:28:46 2009 From: chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:28:46 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] spin maintainer's requirement for the website Message-ID: <50baabb30909071328h38e87b95ua7b849f05a8767f1@mail.gmail.com> Hello Design Team, Since there are a lot of information and mockups about how to get to the new spin website, but not about the layout of the spin website itself. I want to share with you some of my needs as a spin maintainer for FEL, which I believe might be for other spin maintainers. Before I get started, I want to emphasize that FEL's website should look as professional as possible. This is because I want to give those companies that are willing to collaborate with us the feeling that FEL is a mature platform and they can trust us with their contribution and time. That said, there are 4 important aspects what the website should convey: * information for upstream 20% : showing them how their software is being treated and what they are missing if their software is not part of our collection * information for users 30%: basic things : download urls, who are we behind the spin, some screenshots of the software, future events, event slides, photos on events reflecting our maturity, spin's portfolio, Main highlights of the tools, history of the spin (helps the user to choose F-n or F-n+1), spin achievements in real life * information for our contributors 10% : slides templates, our spin fedora hosted website, its tickets, next event, a place to post their publications, developer section * spin portfolio 40%: this is the most important part: It reflects all the key features of all the software under the spin's umbrella and not only copy-paste description of the software. It is accompanied by screenshots, and different solutions for usage. If these 4 aspects are respected, do marketing for the spin should not be difficult (by anyone, even those who have no clue what the spin does). The contents of the four items will be produced by the spin's team and not design team. I would however request that the template being prepared for the spin be less geeky and less crowdy by unnecessary artwork such as gradients etc. As far as I am concerned, Shakthi and I are pushing hard with so that FEL's opensource solutions meet real life user requirements. Our spin technical niche obliges us to opt for a template which tags us as a leader in our field and a EDA distributor such as these: http://www.synopsys.com/home.aspx http://www.mentor.com/ http://www.cadence.com/us/pages/default.aspx I don't know how much time you have allocated to the spin website design, however I have once designed FEL's old page based on Mairin's mockup (F-8 to F-10 timeframe) http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Projects/Fedora%20Spins/Wireframes/spindetailsmock4.png I have migrated (during F-10 timeframe) FEL's website contents on JohnPalmeri's initial moksha like fedora community webpage: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/ I have tweaked it from right-to left so that all the pages can be viewed from _any_ browser. It is important that the spin website can also be viewed under Internet Explorer as well, because some corporate companies especially the managers, marketers and CEOs run windows and they are the ones to seduce for ensure mass deployment of FEL. I would encourage you guys (especially for the spin website : MYSPIN.fedoraproject.org) to opt a template similar to FEL'S website and improve it. It is clean and easy to get contents in without being a web designer. I'm looking forward to be a beta user of the new website. Cheers, Chitlesh From trac at fedorahosted.org Tue Sep 8 17:25:45 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:25:45 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.23f579f15ce4147f30e8fc315a9bbece@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan* Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Changes (by shakthimaan): * owner: chitlesh => shakthimaan* -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 10 18:03:43 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:03:43 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John Message-ID: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Keywords: | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Please respond promptly. The different schedule for 12 caught us off guard, and we are scrambling to get the bulk of the release notes to L10N over the weekend. There will still be time for some tweaking, but we need to get the translators to work on the bulk of it. John J. McDonough -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 10 18:05:53 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:05:53 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.795b81442f3650acbe229fae4bd18cea@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: new => assigned Comment: Hello John, I have already started a draft some days ago. This is still as draft. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf I'll get to you when its done. @EVERYONE: please post the changelog of all your rpms for FEL. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 10 18:12:43 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:12:43 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.5ec7b48a089f5f73afdfdabc9468b5c7@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Comment (by chitlesh): Please do post your changelog of all your rpms for FEL. here so that I can put them into the pdf. Don't them send directly to John as I will not be aware of it :D so I'll miss it for the official release. By the way your name will be entailed on that pdf. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 10 18:24:02 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:24:02 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.6f8a5c5d0521e6a53c3f0383dde9ec31@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Comment (by shakthimaan): mcu8051ide-1.3-1: %changelog * Mon Aug 24 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 1.3-1 - Updated Release, Version - Removed earlier patches that were applied in 1.2 upstream - Re-applied mcu8051-1.1-desktop-exec-path-fix.patch - Added tclx as Requires dependency eqntott-9.0-2: %changelog * Mon Aug 17 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 9.0-2 - Keeping only Changelog and README in the doc section * Tue Aug 11 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 9.0-1 - First .spec release for eqntott espresso-ab-1.0-1: %changelog * Tue Aug 11 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 1.0-1 - First .spec release for espress-ab-1.0 vrq-1.0.58-1 (awaiting package approval): %changelog * Thu Sep 10 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 1.0.58-1 - Added comment for using ExclusiveArch - Removed perl from BR - Simplified make install command and used -p to preserve timestamps for install files - Updated MYDOCDIR in prep section - The main package doc contains AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README faq.html - The devel package doc contains doc/html and example* folders - Cleanup .so and .o files in example* folders -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From aanjhan at gmail.com Fri Sep 11 07:52:33 2009 From: aanjhan at gmail.com (Aanjhan R) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:52:33 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <075.6f8a5c5d0521e6a53c3f0383dde9ec31@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> <075.6f8a5c5d0521e6a53c3f0383dde9ec31@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Fedora Electronic Lab wrote: > ?espresso-ab-1.0-1: > ?%changelog > ?* Tue Aug 11 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 1.0-1 > ?- First .spec release for espress-ab-1.0 Quick spello correction. Its espresso-ab-1.0 And apologies for the hijack of the thread. -- Aanjhan From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Sep 11 07:55:46 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:55:46 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.bc07da28e562a4e7d838e2ba2834c419@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Comment (by chitlesh): Do we really need to translate the FEL's release notes ? the current draft is already 16 pages and I have yet too many things to write in it. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf gEDA-gaf would most probably land into Fedora 12 at the last minute. The translated release notes will be out of sync from the english version. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Fri Sep 11 08:02:50 2009 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:02:50 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> <075.6f8a5c5d0521e6a53c3f0383dde9ec31@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909110102p590f20a2r91c6f5cf79027251@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Aanjhan R wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Fedora Electronic Lab > wrote: >> ?espresso-ab-1.0-1: >> ?%changelog >> ?* Tue Aug 11 2009 Shakthi Kannan - 1.0-1 >> ?- First .spec release for espress-ab-1.0 > > Quick spello correction. Its espresso-ab-1.0 > > And apologies for the hijack of the thread. > > -- what do you mean ? chitlesh From trac at fedorahosted.org Sun Sep 13 10:08:46 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:08:46 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #53: pcb: create lesstif, webserver, gtk subpackages Message-ID: <066.927c8b36020892687c704ab53e4cb52b@fedorahosted.org> #53: pcb: create lesstif, webserver, gtk subpackages ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: PCB Layout | Version: devel Keywords: pcb | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Fedora ships only the gtk subpackages. There was someone on IRC requesting pcb with nogui for webserver services. This can be provided, Fedora's PCB spec should do that by adding proper arguments to the %configure stage -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Sun Sep 13 15:48:52 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:48:52 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #47: gerbv-2.3.0-1 png failed to open In-Reply-To: <066.0d796e72c8d76a8ca219e635345f4549@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.0d796e72c8d76a8ca219e635345f4549@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.d77bbf5378a7ce94cbdee4af7b90d206@fedorahosted.org> #47: gerbv-2.3.0-1 png failed to open -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: PCB Layout | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gerbv-2.3.0-2.fc11 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Sun Sep 13 15:50:15 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:50:15 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #14: Component libraries In-Reply-To: <067.0406d683f9bc122c8ac37172db570e5e@fedorahosted.org> References: <067.0406d683f9bc122c8ac37172db570e5e@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <076.420fef0dd5dd7b1ad308b6aaaa9b4ee6@fedorahosted.org> #14: Component libraries --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: anonymous | Owner: chitlesh Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: trivial | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: PCB Layout | Version: 10 Resolution: worksforme | Keywords: geda, kicad --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => worksforme Comment: Push upstream -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Sun Sep 13 15:52:07 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:07 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #20: package myHDL In-Reply-To: <066.7982c12a785e30f1cda246f42381c862@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.7982c12a785e30f1cda246f42381c862@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.da884e9f2b9800bde4a09bca108d7579@fedorahosted.org> #20: package myHDL -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: FEL | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * cc: jan at jandecaluwe.com (added) -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at gmail.com Mon Sep 14 14:29:22 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:29:22 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] is your package on FEL's 12 (rawhide) livedvd ? Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909140729r6fd45353v3248624c501a4361@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, Can you verify whether your package/packages are among the packages tagged for the FEL-12 Livedvd ? http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/electronic-lab/logs/20090911.16-i386.log If they are not on the log, please reply to this email and mention which packages are missing ? FYI: We now have a roughly nightly spin build at http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/electronic-lab/ Are you guys free for a test day (as from the 28th of september) ? We need to ensure that our packages are properly integrated and that they at least pass the functional test and not only the smoke test. Cheers, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From shakthimaan at gmail.com Mon Sep 14 16:06:59 2009 From: shakthimaan at gmail.com (Shakthi Kannan) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:36:59 +0530 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] is your package on FEL's 12 (rawhide) livedvd ? In-Reply-To: <13dbfe4f0909140729r6fd45353v3248624c501a4361@mail.gmail.com> References: <13dbfe4f0909140729r6fd45353v3248624c501a4361@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, --- On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: | Can you verify whether your package/packages are among the packages | tagged for the FEL-12 Livedvd ? | | http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/electronic-lab/logs/20090911.16-i386.log | | If they are not on the log, please reply to this email and mention | which packages are missing ? \-- 1. eqntott: http://code.google.com/p/eqntott/ 2. I have just pushed 'vrq'. Can this be included as well? SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Sep 14 17:13:47 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:13:47 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #42: to package : Verilog Tool Framework In-Reply-To: <066.7a79f09f7cbafff1517964e8b4af603d@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.7a79f09f7cbafff1517964e8b4af603d@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.797df391650543dfb2002821e28bc26f@fedorahosted.org> #42: to package : Verilog Tool Framework -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: digital design | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: verilog -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Changes (by shakthimaan): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 06:14:15 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:14:15 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] is your package on FEL's 12 (rawhide) livedvd ? In-Reply-To: References: <13dbfe4f0909140729r6fd45353v3248624c501a4361@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909142314k70400513k7cc3e3afb2342632@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > 1. eqntott: > http://code.google.com/p/eqntott/ > > 2. I have just pushed 'vrq'. Can this be included as well? > > SK > Ok, I've appended the comps.xml accordingly. Your packages will also be available during: yum groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' @@ -1385,9 +1385,14 @@ dfu-programmer dinotrace drawtiming - eclipse-veditor eclipse-eclox + eclipse-texlipse + eclipse-veditor electric + emacs-dinotrace + emacs-verilog-mode + emacs-vregs-mode + eqntott espresso-ab gds2pov geda-docs @@ -1421,6 +1426,7 @@ netgen ngspice ngspice-doc + openocd pcb perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser perl-Hardware-Vhdl-Lexer @@ -1454,6 +1460,7 @@ usrp verilator vhd2vl + vrq vym xcircuit xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 10:56:10 2009 From: chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:56:10 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft) Message-ID: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, We have drafted FEL'12 Release Notes, which we dearly want to hear your views. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf As you have read on fedora planet, many universities and small startups are deploying Fedora Electronic Lab. Thus we hope that these release notes will help them deduce whether they need to upgrade to Fedora 12 or not with respect to their needs and design flow. As the document reflects, 42 packages for electronic design and simulation are now available for the EL-5 branch. The document also entails some details about various patches we have applied on our packages, which are not yet available under upstream stable release. I'm happy to say have most of our upstream accepted most of our patches, which is good news for the opensource eco-system. For those who are eager to try our nightly FEL spins, please find the ISO here http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/electronic-lab/ Cheers, Chitlesh Goorah From aanjhan at gmail.com Tue Sep 15 18:00:48 2009 From: aanjhan at gmail.com (Aanjhan R) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:00:48 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft) In-Reply-To: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > We have drafted FEL'12 Release Notes, which we dearly want to hear your views. > > http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf Very very nice release notes! One of the best Release notes I have ever seen for an Open Source project. Hats off first! As a developer of GNUSim8085 I promptly found a mistake :). Pg. 13, gsim85 is repeated. One should be gnusim8085. Regards, Aanjhan From mel at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:41:37 2009 From: mel at redhat.com (Mel Chua) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft) In-Reply-To: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AB088A1.2020904@redhat.com> On 09/15/2009 06:56 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > We have drafted FEL'12 Release Notes, which we dearly want to hear your views. > http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf Thanks, Chitlesh! I've created a ticket for this (in general, please put todo/help requests in Trac, so the Marketing team can track them) at https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/45 with some comments - can you see if that's what you'd like us to do? Yay! Our first consulting project! Anyone from Marketing want a client? ;) --Mel From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Sep 16 07:29:05 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:29:05 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #48: (tracker) verilog-mode update on Fedora rawhide In-Reply-To: <066.4fd5d5d4678998bce93a3abb7c45e850@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.4fd5d5d4678998bce93a3abb7c45e850@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.29a30182ca8cecfc71686b3f007f7710@fedorahosted.org> #48: (tracker) verilog-mode update on Fedora rawhide -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: upstream | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: FEL | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: I'm maintaining a separate emacs-verilog-mode since none of the parties I've contacted have responded with a positive drive to make a change. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Sep 16 07:34:08 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:34:08 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #52: URGENT : send release notes to John In-Reply-To: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.544419aefea527c7714c4b94f2985dba@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.d6bde98f3d5d66d0cda7af551c1daf7f@fedorahosted.org> #52: URGENT : send release notes to John ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: Documentation | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: John, here you go the final draft http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf A ticket has been opened on Fedora Marketing to see if it needs additional marketing value. https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/45 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Wed Sep 16 07:54:37 2009 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:54:37 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft) In-Reply-To: <4AB088A1.2020904@redhat.com> References: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> <4AB088A1.2020904@redhat.com> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909160054m29f964b7ke27fe62d2e3393c8@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, Well just a few points worth noting. Every release, I called for some documents (FEL flyer and Release Notes) review in front of the marketing team. I do this as FEL Spin maintainer and my responsibility to report back to Fedora Board since I'm granted the use of Fedora Trademark. The Marketing team (while I understand FEL technical details might not be relevant for even a software engineer) should focus on * Proper use of Fedora Trademark (whether little or too much) * whether FEL as a Fedora suproject is getting the desired marketing value * how the FEL spin can also give value to other Fedora "products" * Proper feedback from the community and upstream This is basically what the review is about and this procedure should also be used for other spins or fedora subprojects. I would _not_ make any drastic change to the layout of the PDF document or choosing another media, since I have used up all my time dedicated for FEL documents. The PDF layout is basically what you can see in any Corporate Release Notes [:1] I will consider any input that gives Fedora and upstream a marketing value with the success of FEL and any suggestions for improvement are welcome. Since you opened a ticket here, I've closed the FEL ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/52 [:1] http://www.synopsys.com/Support/Licensing/Licensing/Documents/Dockeys/scl_11.0_release_notes.pdf Chitlesh On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Mel Chua wrote: > On 09/15/2009 06:56 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: >> >> We have drafted FEL'12 Release Notes, which we dearly want to hear your >> views. >> http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf > > Thanks, Chitlesh! > > I've created a ticket for this (in general, please put todo/help requests in > Trac, so the Marketing team can track them) at > https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/45 with some comments - can > you see if that's what you'd like us to do? > > Yay! Our first consulting project! Anyone from Marketing want a client? ;) > > --Mel > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list > Fedora-electronic-lab-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list > -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From chitlesh at fedoraproject.org Wed Sep 16 08:09:47 2009 From: chitlesh at fedoraproject.org (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:09:47 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft) In-Reply-To: References: <50baabb30909150356i56c08aa3y475d4cf5c8dea8fc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909160109q76f38717nd2d59953eabdaabe@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Aanjhan R < > wrote: >> http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf > > Very very nice release notes! One of the best Release notes I have > ever seen for an Open Source project. Hats off first! > > As a developer of GNUSim8085 I promptly found a mistake :). > > Pg. 13, gsim85 is repeated. One should be gnusim8085. > > Regards, > Aanjhan Thanks, I've fixed it :) Chitlesh From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Sep 21 16:24:37 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:24:37 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.885dd570dede84861199c8defdf72af7@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan* Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Comment (by shakthimaan): In most examples, CVER needs to be set to use %{_bindir}/cver in .sh files. The draft specification uses sed, touch and mv to preserve time- stamps. Instead, can a single patch be applied to the examples to update the necessary .sh files? -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Sep 24 15:11:58 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:11:58 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #54: Help openmoko contributors get a suitable development platform Message-ID: <066.8bbd98497772ebd2b29dc059c99747ed@fedorahosted.org> #54: Help openmoko contributors get a suitable development platform -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 13 Component: FEL | Version: devel Keywords: kicad, openmoko | -----------------------------+---------------------------------------------- OpenMoko hardware team uses the trunk version of Kicad with their in-house patches. These patches slowly find their way into the kicad trunk. New openmoko contributors will need to compile everything from scratch before having a glimpse to the schematics and layouts, since their favourite distribution is not providing a compatible kicad version. This is ticket against Fedora Electronic Lab team to strive to improve this issue on Fedora so that Fedora users can use opensource software to develop open hardware. That said, this should not be limited to the openmoko's needs but also any other opensource hardware project which are using opensource EDA software. Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521384 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com Mon Sep 28 06:36:15 2009 From: chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:36:15 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Request to register a "Main" desktop Category: Electronics Message-ID: <50baabb30909272336s17d8f9fm5bbc345509db01c7@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, This is a request to register a "Main" desktop Category: Electronics so that it becomes a standard defined by http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Name: Electronics Description : Electronics design and simulation software, e.g. a circuit designer Notes: (none) For nearly 3 years, Fedora is also striving to provide an advanced electronic design and simulation platform for electronic hardware development under the name of "Fedora Electronic Lab". In short we provide opensource solutions for people to develop from IC chips to a final product e.g openmoko smartphone. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL I'm writing you this email on behalf of all upstream projects we are working with so that we all can deliver an unified and standard set of guidelines for other linux distributions, not only for Fedora. Problems we have WITHOUT this electronics main category: * The software we are providing do not fall under "Education" freedesktop MAIN category but fall into an advanced engineering category not yet defined by the freedesktop standard. At the same time, we don't want to mix software for Electronic Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, thus category "Engineering" isn't appropriate for a long term solution. * An unified and standard set of guidelines for all linux distributions and developers. * There are a lot of electronic "design flows". Each design flow contains various set of software. If all the software for electronic design falls into various categories, it does not give any linux distribution the proper credentials and value of their solutions. Opensource solutions are there but lost inside the bag. * No Compatibility across various desktop environments: KDE, gnome, XFCE, LXDE,... We are hoping that if this "Electronics" main category is approved, packagers of various distributions and developers will add Categories=Electronics; to their desktop files. In order not to drown other users into complexity, one of the gEDA developers came up with a small package called "electronics-menu" http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz which provides a "Electronics" menu as described by the RED arrow : http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/images/electronic-menu.png Please accept the icon provided http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz. On Fedora, we have tuned our GUI electronics software's desktop files so that they support this "Electronics" main category. I was told that even debian is opting for this type of menu category. As you can see on this page: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html we have quite a handful set of GUI for electronic design. That said, other electronic solutions are also mixed and confuses a lot of users as they (newbies) can't distinguish the software set they need for their respective design flow (analog, digital, mixed signal, embedded). Hence, I've added submenu support to the http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz as described by the YELLOW arrow. However, we are still under discussion about the proper subcategory naming. Thus please leave these additional categories for a later discussion. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/images/electronic-menu.png Kind regards, Chitlesh Goorah From chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com Tue Sep 29 09:38:29 2009 From: chitlesh.goorah at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:38:29 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] EL-5 comps versus FEL collection Message-ID: <50baabb30909290238n55551fb8xbc492cf0b8ce49bb@mail.gmail.com> Hello there, On Fedora, we have a comps group 'electronic-lab' which facilitates the users' life to install FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) collection: # yum groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' I wish to have a similar comps group for the EPEL-5 branch. Of course, not all packages under the FEL collection are in EPEL-5 branch due to compatibility reasons. If you are interested to follow FEL packages found in Fedora branches and EPEL-5 branch please visit * For detailed list with respective versions and build dates: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html * FEL-12 Release Notes (EPEL-5 Repository Section) http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf We already have 42 packages of the FEL collections in EPEL-5 repository. I really want to extend FEL support for the EL distributions as our userbase is growing and requesting long term support. Kind Regards, Chitlesh Goorah From trac at fedorahosted.org Tue Sep 29 15:58:32 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:58:32 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.3efef4554346e4613ba2cca3bd113d4c@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan* Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Comment (by shakthimaan): Never mind, fixed everything in the .spec file, and uploaded for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From trac at fedorahosted.org Tue Sep 29 18:13:02 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:13:02 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #54: Help openmoko contributors get a suitable development platform In-Reply-To: <066.8bbd98497772ebd2b29dc059c99747ed@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.8bbd98497772ebd2b29dc059c99747ed@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.5f92cb33fdc8daee7e85cf40fca39d3b@fedorahosted.org> #54: Help openmoko contributors get a suitable development platform --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 13 Component: FEL | Version: devel Resolution: | Keywords: kicad, openmoko --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Comment (by chitlesh): "Fped" for package review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From chitlesh at gmail.com Wed Sep 30 09:39:50 2009 From: chitlesh at gmail.com (Chitlesh GOORAH) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:39:50 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Please review your section in FEL-12's release notes Message-ID: <13dbfe4f0909300239s20b6af24y6733c82caade1171@mail.gmail.com> Dear Upstream, Fedora Packagers and FEL users, Your software have either been updated or included for the first time on the fedora repositories and EPEL-5 repository. We have reached Fedora 12 freeze period and it is schedule for general release on the 2009-11-10. We have jotted down the release notes of your software. We would appreciate if you could review the release notes section of your respective software releases. Our final draft is: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf thank you Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Sep 30 14:17:01 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Electronic Lab) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:17:01 -0000 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #18: package gplcver In-Reply-To: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> References: <066.097792f6a76f2b3ae3ccdf2650a74e47@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <075.c94459affef1d96f2ee1170208233ee8@fedorahosted.org> #18: package gplcver ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan* Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: VHDL/Verilog | Version: devel Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Changes (by shakthimaan): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- Ticket URL: Fedora Electronic Lab Design, Simulate and Program electronics. From krustev.svilen at googlemail.com Wed Sep 30 22:18:16 2009 From: krustev.svilen at googlemail.com (Svilen) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:18:16 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: Please review your section in FEL-12's release notes In-Reply-To: <13dbfe4f0909300239s20b6af24y6733c82caade1171@mail.gmail.com> References: <13dbfe4f0909300239s20b6af24y6733c82caade1171@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AC3D928.20407@googlemail.com> Hi Chitlesh, Having in mind the upcoming Toped bugfix release I would like to submit some changes related to the release notes. In an attempt to save you some time - please find below the edited notes (p.8). The new release is scheduled for the end of this week. I hope you'll be able to see the source tarball in Friday. Regards Svilen > Updated to the consolidation release 0.9.5. The Fedora Toped package > sets the variable $TPD_GLOBAL to /usr/share/toped by default so that > the user could run toped out of the box. > Graham Petley and Svilen Krustev provided 2 TELL ?les[5] as a > demonstration how toped can interact with Pharosc Standard Cells via > toped?s GDSII and CIF parsers. > > Highlights > ? New graphic renderer which speeds-up the drawing up-to 3.5 times. > Requires openGL version 1.4 and Virtual Buffer Objects. It will be > used as a base for future graphical effects. > ? The old renderer remains to cover graphic drivers implementing older > openGL versions and particularly virtual desktops. F-11 uses openGL > 1.3 out of the box, so the the old renderer will be active by default. > This is not an issue, because its speed is signi?cantly improved as well. > ? Updates and ?xes in the external interfaces. GDSII in particular. > ? New utility for conversion of Virtuoso(C) technology ?les to TELL. > ? TDT format updated with new records. Its version is updated to 0.7. > ? Signi?cant improvmens in the GDSII conversion speed. Multi gigabyte > files are now converted in minutes. > ? Further updates on the user interface customization - toolbars. > ? Updates in the internal handling of the cell references. In result > layer 0 is handled as a normal layer now. > ? Provisions on a new Calibre(C) error report parser. Work in progress. > ? Many bug ?xes. > > Caution > Toped releases before 0.94 will not be able to read the new TDT ?les. > The new release should read TDT files independently of the format version. On 09/30/2009 10:39 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > Dear Upstream, Fedora Packagers and FEL users, > > Your software have either been updated or included for the first time > on the fedora repositories and EPEL-5 repository. > > We have reached Fedora 12 freeze period and it is schedule for general > release on the 2009-11-10. We have jotted down the release notes of > your software. We would appreciate if you could review the release > notes section of your respective software releases. > > Our final draft is: > http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf > > thank you > Chitlesh > >