Exim

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:55:14PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> 
>> I think the summary is: "if it's maintained by RH internally for RHEL already
>> there needs to be a way for that to be pushed to extras."
>> 
>> So I don't think anyone is really against it being in extras, but there seems
>> to be some question on how exactly it gets in.
> 
> this really seems trivial, to me.

I thought so too.

> 
> check it into extras and maintain it there, when rhel needs it they
> branch the trees anyway - so you copy it into the branch then.

I had the same thought you did at first, but I guess there are reasons some
think that won't work.  I won't pretend to understand those reasons, so you'll
have to ask David for more clarification.

You two play nice now ;)

josh