<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Yep top level package (aka nothing depends on it), and for people running php it can have huge benifits. Many other such packages such as php-Smarty, php-json, php-pecl-mailparse etc that are very usefull to people who use php .. so why not include them in the comps? -- Chris Toshio Kuratomi wrote: <blockquote cite="mid1155755577.2662.69.camel@localhost" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:27 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:52:18AM +0200, Chris Chabot wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hmmm where to put php-pecl-apc .. its an addon (byte code cache) for php, so it doesn't really fit well under 'web servers', and i saw there's no php packages included in the comps at all yet </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">Is it really necessary to have php-pecl-apc in comps at all? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> It's a toplevel package, isn't it? In other words, nothing depends on it so if it's not selected by the user from comps, it won't get installed? -Toshio </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>