From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 08:55:57 2009
From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 08:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel import.log, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201085557.B96777011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ankursinha

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2054/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
	oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 
Log Message:


* Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-3
- cvs commit



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:HEAD:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233478160


--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>Old Standard</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <match target="pattern">
        <test name="family">
            <string>serif</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard TTF</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias>
        <family>serif</family>
        <prefer>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </prefer>
   </alias>

</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	oldstandard
%define fontconf 	60-%{fontname}.conf

Name:		%{fontname}-sfd-fonts
Version:	2.0.2
Release:	3%{?dist}
Summary:	Old Standard True-Type Fonts

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	OFL
URL:		http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html
Source0:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf

# guidelines say this can be used
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontforge,fontpackages-devel
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description
The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive
a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif
typefaces, very commonly used in various editions
printed in the late 19th and early 20th century,
but almost completely  abandoned later.


%prep
%setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version}

for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do
	sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/'  -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i;
done
for txt in OFL* ; do
	sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new
	touch -r $txt $txt.new
	mv $txt.new $txt
done

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} .

%build
fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd <<EOF
i = 1 
while ( i < \$argc )
  Open (\$argv[i], 1)
  Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
  PrintSetup (5) 
  PrintFont (0, 0, "", \$fontname + "-sample.pdf")
  Close()
  i++ 
endloop
EOF

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}

ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf

%doc *.txt *.pdf

%dir %{_fontdir}/

%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-3
- corrected the fontconfig
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-2
- Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 
- 2.0.2-1
- Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla)
- changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 08:55:25 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+oldstand-manual.pdf
+oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 08:55:26 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28  oldstand-manual.pdf
+9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf  oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip



From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 11:41:25 2009
From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 11:41:25 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201114125.CAFA97011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ankursinha

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24015/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
	oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 
Log Message:


* Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org>
- 2.0.2-3
- first koji commit



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:F-9:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233487888


--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>Old Standard</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <match target="pattern">
        <test name="family">
            <string>serif</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard TTF</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias>
        <family>serif</family>
        <prefer>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </prefer>
   </alias>

</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	oldstandard
%define fontconf 	60-%{fontname}.conf

Name:		%{fontname}-sfd-fonts
Version:	2.0.2
Release:	3%{?dist}
Summary:	Old Standard True-Type Fonts

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	OFL
URL:		http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html
Source0:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf

# guidelines say this can be used
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontforge,fontpackages-devel
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description
The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive
a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif
typefaces, very commonly used in various editions
printed in the late 19th and early 20th century,
but almost completely  abandoned later.


%prep
%setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version}

for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do
	sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/'  -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i;
done
for txt in OFL* ; do
	sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new
	touch -r $txt $txt.new
	mv $txt.new $txt
done

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} .

%build
fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd <<EOF
i = 1 
while ( i < \$argc )
  Open (\$argv[i], 1)
  Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
  PrintSetup (5) 
  PrintFont (0, 0, "", \$fontname + "-sample.pdf")
  Close()
  i++ 
endloop
EOF

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}

ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf

%doc *.txt *.pdf

%dir %{_fontdir}/

%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-3
- corrected the fontconfig
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-2
- Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 
- 2.0.2-1
- Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla)
- changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 11:40:53 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+oldstand-manual.pdf
+oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 11:40:53 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28  oldstand-manual.pdf
+9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf  oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip



From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 11:47:55 2009
From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 11:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201114755.AC1967011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ankursinha

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26759/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
	oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 
Log Message:



* Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org>
- 2.0.2-3
- first commit to koji



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:F-10:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233488569


--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>Old Standard</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <match target="pattern">
        <test name="family">
            <string>serif</string>
        </test>
    </match>
    <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard TTF</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias binding="same">
        <family>Old Standard</family>
        <accept>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </accept>
   </alias>
   <alias>
        <family>serif</family>
        <prefer>
        <family>Old Standard SFD</family>
        </prefer>
   </alias>

</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	oldstandard
%define fontconf 	60-%{fontname}.conf

Name:		%{fontname}-sfd-fonts
Version:	2.0.2
Release:	3%{?dist}
Summary:	Old Standard True-Type Fonts

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	OFL
URL:		http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/en/fonts.html
Source0:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	http://www.thessalonica.org.ru/downloads/oldstand-manual.pdf

# guidelines say this can be used
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontforge,fontpackages-devel
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description
The Old Standard font family is an attempt to revive
a specific type of Modern (classicist) style of serif
typefaces, very commonly used in various editions
printed in the late 19th and early 20th century,
but almost completely  abandoned later.


%prep
%setup -q -c -n oldstandard-%{version}

for i in $(ls OldStandard*.sfd);do
	sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/'  -e 's/Old \Standard \TT/Old \Standard \SFD/' $i;
done
for txt in OFL* ; do
	sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new
	touch -r $txt $txt.new
	mv $txt.new $txt
done

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} .

%build
fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd <<EOF
i = 1 
while ( i < \$argc )
  Open (\$argv[i], 1)
  Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
  PrintSetup (5) 
  PrintFont (0, 0, "", \$fontname + "-sample.pdf")
  Close()
  i++ 
endloop
EOF

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}

ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf

%doc *.txt *.pdf

%dir %{_fontdir}/

%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-3
- corrected the fontconfig
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 2.0.2-2
- Rebuild according to new packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org> 
- 2.0.2-1
- Rebuilt for f10 with minor changes to spec file. (#457947 at bugzilla)
- changed version number as per FONTLOG.txt in source zip file.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 11:47:25 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+oldstand-manual.pdf
+oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	29 Jan 2009 00:35:36 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 11:47:25 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+f793623cb703f27e6d57d498e7de2e28  oldstand-manual.pdf
+9c001e7a2d2f86d3943a8f011aea8bbf  oldstandard-2.0.2.src.zip



From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 12:22:15 2009
From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 12:22:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10 cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 
	1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201122216.223167011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ankursinha

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32078/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 
	import.log 
Log Message:


* Sun 1 Feb 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org>
- 1.1-3
- first commit to koji



--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BonvenoCF</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BonvenoCF</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	cf-bonveno
%define fontconf	60-%{fontname}.conf


Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	1.1
Release:	3%{?dist}
Summary:	A fun font by Barry Schwartz

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	GPLv2+
URL:		http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml
Source0:	http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

BuildArch: 	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontforge, fontpackages-devel
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem


%description
A set of fun fonts from the crud factory.

%prep
%setup -q -c


for txt in COPYING README ; do
	sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new
	touch -r $txt $txt.new
	mv $txt.new $txt
done

%build
fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd <<EOF
i = 1 
while ( i < \$argc )
	Open (\$argv[i], 1)
	Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
	PrintSetup (5) 
	PrintFont (0, 0, "", \$fontname + "-sample.pdf")
	Close()
	i++ 
endloop
EOF

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -pm 644 *.ttf  %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}

ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}


%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf


%doc  COPYING* README*

%dir %{_fontdir}/

%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-3
- changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package.
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-2
- rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-1
- rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla)



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:F-10:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233490822


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 12:21:44 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+BonvenoCF-1.1.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 12:21:44 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d  BonvenoCF-1.1.zip



From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 12:24:53 2009
From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 12:24:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9 cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201122453.5E6E17011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ankursinha

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32660/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 
	import.log 
Log Message:

* Sun Feb 1 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org>
- 1.1-3
- first commit to koji



--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BonvenoCF</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BonvenoCF</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec ---
%define	fontname	cf-bonveno
%define fontconf	60-%{fontname}.conf


Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	1.1
Release:	3%{?dist}
Summary:	A fun font by Barry Schwartz

Group:		User Interface/X
License:	GPLv2+
URL:		http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml
Source0:	http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip
Source1:	%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:	%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

BuildArch: 	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontforge, fontpackages-devel
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem


%description
A set of fun fonts from the crud factory.

%prep
%setup -q -c


for txt in COPYING README ; do
	sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new
	touch -r $txt $txt.new
	mv $txt.new $txt
done

%build
fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd <<EOF
i = 1 
while ( i < \$argc )
	Open (\$argv[i], 1)
	Generate (\$fontname + ".ttf")
	PrintSetup (5) 
	PrintFont (0, 0, "", \$fontname + "-sample.pdf")
	Close()
	i++ 
endloop
EOF

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -pm 644 *.ttf  %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
		%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}

ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
	%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}


%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf


%doc  COPYING* README*

%dir %{_fontdir}/

%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-3
- changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package.
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-2
- rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
- 1.1-1
- rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla)



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:F-9:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233490976


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 12:24:22 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+BonvenoCF-1.1.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 12:24:22 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d  BonvenoCF-1.1.zip



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  1 18:39:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:39:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-483400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902011839.n11IdcXs016409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-01 13:39:37 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  1 18:37:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:37:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif
 decorative latin TTF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483363-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902011837.n11IbrTr016174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-01 13:37:52 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From slankes at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 19:47:10 2009
From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 19:47:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201194710.3C4F27011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31377

Modified Files:
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix typo in description


Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 22:11:44 -0000	1.1
+++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 19:46:39 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       20030527
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 %description 
 
-This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book 
+This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book 
 Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope.
 
 Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and 
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-2
+- Fix typo in description 
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-1
 - Initial packaging
 



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 20:11:31 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 20:11:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel import.log, NONE,
	1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201201131.E268C7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1817/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
	yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20050524-1
- initial packaging



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1_fc10:HEAD:yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-20050524-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233518597


--- NEW FILE yanone-tagesschrift-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>fantasy</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Yanone Tagesschrift</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>Yanone Tagesschrift</family>
    <default>
      <family>fantasy</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname yanone-tagesschrift
%define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf

%define archivename YanoneTagesschrift

Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
Version:        20050524
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A serif decorative latin font

Group:          User Interface/X
License:        CC-BY
URL:            http://www.yanone.de/typedesign/tagesschrift/
Source0:        %{url}%{archivename}.zip
Source1:        %{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

BuildArch:      noarch
BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem

%description
Serif decorative latin TTF font by Jan Gerner, suitable for titles and short 
runs of text.
It was created in a font-workshop at the university of Weimar in 2005.

%prep
%setup -q -c


%build


%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
      %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}


%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf

%doc

%dir %{_fontdir}


%changelog
* Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20050524-1
- initial packaging


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 18:38:26 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 20:11:01 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+YanoneTagesschrift.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	1 Feb 2009 18:38:26 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 20:11:01 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+97950e396bc61974732b3db902cc9817  YanoneTagesschrift.zip



From slankes at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 20:19:08 2009
From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 20:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201201908.8EA0D7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3411/F-10

Modified Files:
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix typo in description


Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000	1.1
+++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 20:18:38 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       20030527
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 %description 
 
-This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book 
+This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book 
 Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope.
 
 Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and 
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-2
+- Fix typo in description 
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-1
 - Initial packaging
 



From slankes at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 20:19:08 2009
From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 20:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201201908.A8D327011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3411/F-9

Modified Files:
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix typo in description


Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000	1.1
+++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 20:18:38 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       20030527
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 %description 
 
-This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book 
+This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name comes from the book 
 Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope.
 
 Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and 
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-2
+- Fix typo in description 
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-1
 - Initial packaging
 



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 22:24:45 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 22:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [SPAM] rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel import.log, NONE,
	1.1 vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vollkorn-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 vollkorn.otf, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090201222445.6E6187011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19443/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf vollkorn-fonts.spec 
	vollkorn.otf 
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 1.008-1
- initial packaging



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
vollkorn-fonts-1_008-1_fc10:HEAD:vollkorn-fonts-1.008-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233526980


--- NEW FILE vollkorn-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Vollkorn</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>Vollkorn</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE vollkorn-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname vollkorn
%define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf

%define archivename Vollkorn

Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
Version:        1.008
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A serif latin font with good readability

Group:          User Interface/X
License:        CC-BY
URL:            http://www.grafikfritze.de/?p=43
#http://www.grafikfritze.de/download.php?download=1
Source0:        %{fontname}.otf  
Source1:        %{name}-fontconfig.conf
Source2:        %{archivename}.pdf
BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

BuildArch:      noarch
BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem

%description
Serif latin OTF font by Friedrich Althausen with focus on good readability.
Because of this it is relatively dark and strong and has emphasized serifs. 
Vollkorn will especially work good in reading-sizes with its familiar and 
smooth overall picture.

%prep
%setup -q -c -T
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} .

%build


%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
      %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}


%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf

%doc *.pdf

%dir %{_fontdir}


%changelog
* Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 1.008-1
- initial packaging


--- NEW FILE vollkorn.otf ---
OTTO
 t
?,

	?+?\??
???


?E????B?
??J?
			,	4	9	>	B	N	Z	^	b	f	q	x	}	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	??b
l\????????????m????????????@?????z??u?e`C
????v?T?11??8g+qG???????"???t????????????Z?O?P????`?U?`?l{1Ojr?????m??H%?HR?????|?}?~g?Wxs?x?~???fe[wr
??B????@?]+
,O???R?{??
?4??{??o5??w`?-i
?~??>???rN?(
?????np????a??????zL?y??k?????y????B???????????????~?{?}V??}ya??7???-KZPCnu??~???????????????????Y?????f??????????????#
;?~/
O
?I
?????{c?P
?<T??
??
?,
?6??"it????????sllsul???????????:
E???_
?????$Y[PS^Ux????g?[?O????????j?c?t??????????????(??r??
?]
??N
?0????n??
?h?H
h?
?A
????
4
????M9p
????????*?N2?9
<;?AA>?
7v?
R??{`???
?K????????t?,DI???????+f.
?aaPE?????7y???
z?i"x.
q
????0T
U?S
???????????????k???a?]HvI\?}x???O
?I
?????{c?[
R?r?zw?D?
?D?l?g?i?y?y??d?Jbpuj[?{?h?t?n-<<S#;a??`???????????:??W??????C?P?6?c????????q???U?
v
??'??????????????'o}ocdw???????}?
?gw?ZZp??b???????????u?m?N???s??wt??g?hg??v?~??u?6?p>//?1????????????XhXo>*(??(?????9???8?9???9?8???9?8???8`?O?-?.?P?O?.?.?O?P?.?-?O?P?-?-?P??m??ut??
??t?0;n8*)?,??UfUm9##??1?$????re?NNYE??????K?d?UVO\/?F`?????
???
l?abi????????????y?M??????D?YOr??n??x?????a
?????
??u?Y??d?|?h????????????}]?]?T?<L?==??
??????????a?dg?zu?y?u?SUv?I?v??w
?W?6_[YXU^????d?Q?O?????m?c?t??????????~?????^?F?`y6
@
~?v?~d?jjm??w?p??$?Z?Z?~?{?|e?j?j???H?y????????????}}anUB`???????'4?bS\aI?nh???????h?}?\??
i?(?k}[!?????T
??????????'??K??????3??Z??????
??????'t??i?{????x?????|????????5?9?N??u?u?\?
?????????????w
?????w???j???????*?????~?V?g?[???,??<C1S>&#W??????~aai\L??wll~o__|??????d?g?b{~?~???svfk=,.??*?P?????????????????w?{??s?A?
???
???}?r???&^?>GV?
??????R?????????????????????y?~??GZN???????????\??x?{????	?)?????w???;e@?$?4??????7?{?3???rd?V`
????{?}?7???Od?????}????B???????Z?q?/??????????????y
?????s7
G~????w???T???z??w???/?????????v
U}???}h????^>%"W??????}?v?Tw???^??}ac?w???????p????{?W?????????~??w?????????????v|q?????Y??43?8?g??lv???w??\???????7????????L???k`?lw???4??wb?
M??
X2???tv???pv?Mw
??qv?(??w?
??w?	~?}v?





?
J
V
b
|
?
?
!2:@HO[ckqx'7@FNU\cjq??
	
,
3
?
?M??????5?W??
U?Z:?????;DS??????T????T???L?y?e??h?~????1^? A f w ?!K!?"V"?#<#?$>$?$?%)%<%D%h%?&&L&\&t&?&?&?&?&?&?'
''*'d'm(%)D)?**?*?++M+~+?,,E,?,?,?-
-?..&.?/?/?0'0q0?1;1?1?2 2?373?44d4?4?5p5?6a6?7c7?7?7?8?8?8?9'9B9?9?::f:?:?:?;;`:???v?#?????R??S??????????s?|?O???????????????~?[???????ee????????v?
??_?????
?z??K?_`G?????????????E?_?\bPpC?[U?????
???Q?`]J??????????????t?Z?a`SkH?WM???????}??N?a`K???????????s???
??%
???|v?+??<??w?	??_?~?O?`????l??f?KPVLD?6~]?q??????|?ow?OOs??n???????????Z?v?P??????????????^v?}w???_??#x1
??v?=??????a??????????y?~??
??{e?3?
?{v????4???q???\??????????????t|?}?G????Q????????????
?{?Y???????w????
?????&
??v??p??w???b??R
?P????????.??}v?!??w????(????WaK=?!Z?r????
?_u?OOl??u\?????????????u?R????????????????o?Xl?????????|??j?Yh?~o?{???d????	???w
???{???m2l[zz??????zs=zm?~?{z???ya?Qf?t?yl??m???	??0?/8?%S?FoV???n??????h?'?@P@?????}<????%?
???B???C?x?v?aw
???A????n
?r?zq?W??????????????m?v?'??!?	??	"???Hme|\?Q??~?}}???zo??Vu?f????}???????????????k?v???????~??6?@k?q??????p?komnmg????X????????a?N??E?^??
jo??r{?x}qb?????????8&??.&E???????h?y????????
a?p?ws ??
`?FB
:???	?
??N?o?pv???	??#???Qm????}?-d
???f?f????????????q?{??nmmqoioo?????????jv?D???w???r???pm??sd??R{
???
|p?\|??,??x?V????????P?
D?~?~?}6aPcRY????????????????)??O?0????????tv????	?
???y???m????'?0?	?&eq??x?H?k
?V?q?Y????????????????h?????P?F????6?8?^Rau???Bk?m?????v???????y????m??ud??z?c?x`?x?????y??xo?[[^??q???????????Nqx_pK|&.??3??I?'??|}_?;NA &?(??????U?Z?d??
?&???v??w
?????s?j?FpY?
??@??????????????????M?
??
?
???v?X?
??
?????o?c?Lj`KK?????????????s?h?????????????w?e?
????
??
??Q??,pQ?Wpj
hu
??
??X?
+???+d?.

}&
0?8"
???8E%
??p8????
?%?
??&??\
?q?
????O8
x?
??x>
???i?A
??G????c_XjeTMn?????????u?
???????tmr}kaew???????!???_v????@???v?u?yB?"??D?????????z?v????]?R???????E??Y???\?????????Y??n?~??`???nv?????@w?{?}???/??D@?E?2???????z???
?l??w?{?;g?V?
??????#?
?t/u???v?=??w??????????v?R????????????????y???}Q???~d??{???~??$?????}~??????v?|?c????????????????~?}?}K????T??~???????????{v?@???w?	?????`?
?I?=??`?p?????~?oj?cYh??n??????????x?_??o?Y?????????????????r?1? ?}
q
?	???0v
????#
???sv????h?t
?ZU??h?
?J???
?7/?"?3f??m??0????????L?}?z??T?#?L?9???v?v?x????3?;??=?Z??(?k}[!?Q
?
z
??!?P?????
?	?????j?n?
????
??x?z?????
??x?}??????g??$
h?
?????<.?8$
E%
??u$
2
6?$
}&
n?	$
"
?o?$
??
?&?*?$
.?"??$
5
??{$
=??$
Ff?
$
?<???c??????
???????[?y?z?{??w??NZ?+u?
??5????????????cZCZ??(???1l?ls?g????
???????M????
??S??#??'??yp??\?`T?|}?t?%?_?,?*M?	????w??N<?+???#??'
??????<v?8'
E%
??u'
2
?'
}&
??	'
"
?&?'
5
P?{'
.F??'
=?%?'
F??
'
g
??
?P?
!
?K?v\
_
??
???
???/Q?T???h
???{???h?5???p?`??- ?U??, Q W j
q
??
??????????(??r??
?]
??,
QW
j
v??
????
???'&3?,Q&Wj
2
??8???k??
?????????|?????RM??[jy?w?c?p?VB0GL6Kr??i???????????5??h??????V?[?V?^???????`?KJdU2??}??????|~?j?O
?I
?????{w?
L
????*????h?R?????o
{v
K?;
?????~?V?J?pv????w????????????????|?}?
X?}?_???U,?I????????????????~?T???????????w????M??????/????7t?_?L?`?{~?x??h?S/??_?~?????~|?q\?aaW??k????????????;?B?XI}?{z??~????????
\~??
???kt???????[???????Z
?eg

?F _
????$???tv????????	???,????
?N????????????T?????d?}t?~k_?h?-;?#?F????=???o? ????????????P6?+?>?D??v?b?!?!?W???????????
?????P??.r??_???L???????8?T?|n????????wv?????????????????~?}?d?n?kj?a?l??D?????????~?YO??Z\???M9??oQ??????|~?rS?aac??p????
??????????P?h?????????????t?y???
|?]?q?}????v?^?????????yv???????	??~?????uv??w??[??????{??lZ:?r????
]
???'?;"-???+|os??y?????????????????_??p
?	???????*?C?v??
??%?.?;????O???????
Z?~?uO?h???~??{????u???dwY????Q?n?v?????n?6?
?'????L????????
^???yN?>????|?W???:???|?|?X??y???gwU?~??Q??+?=????????O??lv???w????N?6????????????y?{?{?\?x??_??s?k?|???z?~?
_C
??????W?%?\??h??{?}???c?*?d?????
??w
??????x???T????????????????????????tv?????9????????????{???|d???aQ?.?g??6????L??????{??z`?_i?bb[??m?????????h??	?D??L?eo?|?`?}?||??mg?mmQ??u????????????1?o`?A???o???f?P????????q}???}V????h??S??C?????E????????!??z??g??	????\?????z??l^?aa\??u????
??????\???R?]
???+?G&?4FH(v?0??]? ?????~YQ??Z]?D?:6?w?n?u??aZ?{?????lu??v????????
????^????????31?`?=
????
???!"
???!hu
?v?Tw9???J!E%
J??!?4?
???(???r8
r?
??r>
?k?!}&
?*?!g
??!
????!_
??????h
???{???i?5???q?`??-
????????(??r??
?]
e?!v?v?TwH0?'?!p
???????????
??
?,
?6?=?r!3??`'
3y?`$
???
?=?q????
?0???
?
a
?
?

??N?,?Q
?W?j
p
??
????
????????
???
??,
??6
??????01!?$
???v??w
?!????t?e?KnX?
??@??????
????v??w
? ?a???h?b?Sn]JK~???????@?????????????????hv?|???????????????spzg?l?q?x???y?o?}n?o?w{?1?v?v????????t?d?LtXMH?
?<?|
pX?`????;?????????
?1?{v?v?????]???v?d?LsVNI?
?<?|
oXN?`????=?????????
?1?~v??w
?x?iv????????????????Z]t-????l?}m?s?rz?,x????????????????\af*????i?}l?u?u}?Fv??????w
????????z?????O???x?wd?R?g?}y?y}?q?S????e?b?(C7??:|{??~?0?b?[????????????3?N?~??9?8????????4???V?L??y????????
P?l?q?rS?dcN?3??|v?=??????K??????????z?
X?o?^??Q????h???~??rL?chcO??t??????????????t?R??????????????v?pw
??m??
8?)?)?
,?????)?)???HUEt[4?????X??????e?d?+?Esy?*v?~???w
?????m????????x?|?|??mj?s?s???????e6?9?@??????????,?V??]??B?l?B ??????
?????`???????????????????j?Wh?????P7??Rt,?
t?3`?2?$?<'Lh???????????????????
?"??????w???????w
??????'?????{?Bi7:t?)???????J?
?*3??#C??6???h??1?????.?`??????7?P[jx}w?x?xv/?/v??????n?????????????1??H0?X?
r{qz|y??????????????/???*Vw?Ry?{?????????
?????Y???????H??>?K???u???]49GbYs?J?S;%4L?	?	>????????A?]??????"?|2?n???????U?4?PZtf<??Y???b?]ZjoR??W?m?X????????????l?)v??????
???????>???????????tu]qO"3??
?!x????Z?5AhIP??v?????????????XfX?V?eYd^[X??????_?X?L??????q?j?w??????????~?v?
v??w
??????????????Z?_?P??????`?K?`{l]A?
?Y????????????\?i?V??????\?R?^|hkPqc????????v??w
?????????????T?Z?[??????`?I?bqYgT?
.??????$?
??????_???i$?	?%X? {?j?x???~u?s???????a?gg]??
||t??~????????????????rlmvnddu??????4??????????
:???r??E*???	?$?? ???????????|?ZR??w$V?i?????
???????\?r?a?wvQsF???hp????????skkwpd??????w??:???)??????z~?|?I??,{z????P??y???????c???o???v?Dw
??B/???
`?=
??v/?
??
`?CB
???x/????%???
???B????C0???/t???????
??[???????Z
?e0?7?u/???v??w
??????
?Q?P?4}w????????????????~??v?v?w?????????
?S?K?9~w????????????????'??
?R?N?6x}w??????????????????zv?f??????????????A
??
N
??i?zw???Ye?LP?4w??\a??P W??????|?O??/y?N?????
??4?9u?Q????
???%?v?o???f???
?????a?FGQ?*e??;?????a?-PY?,L??
???
?x
?*d
??-
????W
PVLD?Ek?p??~?
qBN?[_??x??0
?
i????
?3??wv????????y?w?,????f?\???????????Y???{?yw??m???E???2?g??9
98?8GG?
??????`M?O?R??
X\???????????????????.???.?W??c???????a????/????????Z?9
<8?))??2?g!?$?Z?Z??(?c??"????:
?B?T?'??
?y
4
??????MJ??b%;Pw??G??&!H?h?h?'???z
%?%????[??p??????}???^?o??[??????????
`\wGAV??kSgRf@?(LX
??j\????????'I??|???????p?-DdB'?	?0??????_?<? |??o?X^paK??#????
???4?????@G??sf???????
?>I??{??????W4??$??????????
_TrFCY??m????~~efZxr
?
?(y\JdB'_?b?j?L?~?uj?a????????????J?{p??{??R??`v?#??w??????;??zn????????F2?M?. f
9H??XUEzx??|??N?m???Z?
?(?k??|????U?t?i?????2X??r?u??!?H?h:?K?Z???/?_U?[:?
v??w
???????"xx????+?2??&??????'??????????v?u?
??y?F????jZ\oG????;?>?p??K}s?3?\?v?aw
???N?????
?s?
??k?p??~?
qR?r???BWP{???????c?q?W????????????????sv???w?!?h?t
&?
??U??]W{????????r?
??qv??w
?}??????E
@N??VE
??qv?}?rw?????5?????Y??F
???(E
???m?
ko??s???H?k
?Y?~?L???????????????}???
S?F_???X?Fv?8???????w?
??s?????;V?{?$??'2A?
?r??
?]
????
???`???o???cw????????vlfyve???kqvns?g??????r?l????
????o????m?@???y?6
@@
???m????,???U
S~??
???k?E?y6
@
?R
P?????f?^
}&
??^
hu
??m?9?h?$Zg
??m?!
?x?gZv??m?H??y 6
@
????8
?i??????3G
g
??8?????!
0?
G
T?}".
T??G
??????!?
??????P??iMOXdTZU???????qrsqg_?h??????j?i?????MLc???j??a?j???j???
j????{#?8??????8?"%66$???????F56HF36F???#5?????f??}y????????????????y?????????umpxyo??q?P???????|o??}?|?u??????R|????C????B????????l??????v?????-??8????1??????????s?f?t???????x?q]??s?????????}o?utl??z??????????l??ci?qg????????????????????????????r????b??po??????????vt?xwv??x????????????s?c?
?,;?? \?u?S???~?}??j~nas??M???]?b?Q
?
z
??!#????????????a?????????|?|cZVE^O??{?I??
0)?(>a??~????????|??????R?=???????????????????
V}?Ry|?????????????????'???
?v?Xw?}?;c?U?
????
?M?9w?}?;d?V?
??????v?{??nw
????????p?|?????BI??=???
?c???????????n?ow?{?#l?A??nw
????|ws?C?:?N?PL><SNu?v???d?qI?(?N????????g?[?\?h?????|FC;4PM|??s???vmu????????xmntxp??)??{plsgez??????????L??4w
?y????A??q?|?????P?k???????
?1???????????4?>w?}?%??K?f?Mw?}??}?K?
????`{v??w
?9??x?r???,??#????????????????|?$!:?,Z{v??w
???x?r??????#??????????v?~?~|?$?:?	,?????b?y??????aG3?
???????D??|??I???:??????7?????(???y{??????G??
????-?aD??????????:??????7J??]???c????
??????j?%mk?b???
????
???=w?{?Go?M??????
?t?u?]??????A?
?????9????5??wz??f?]?_?{}?z??h?RU|`T+?;?8?>????????w?Y??????????????????}?^?w?`r4qDlR?x?x?v?g???????]?X?c?g?q?v?KWJl5?>Q???????r????????a?m?t?y?dkf\D"?S??????d?N?Q?@????w
???????F2FA((I??
 ?yai?l\?rr???????\H/\?ru?~?????Wig?_????????Gii?a??????
?ag?
??c?Q?G?6??t|g~{V?a?b????f?????:}z????-?????g]?Z?L?????????????J?Mv?a?????bw
?e????:j??rxy???????????OO??`????????????????t???????Z?X?K???????'????????T?R?U?:?t?g~{R?\?]??8?F?ntq?I?9??????l?s?v?fR?P?V?S?S??????4????-????m{?<B0R?k[LC?V??????jn???
??????4????4????1????n{?<B0T?f[LC?V??????hn?
?????<B0R>%"Y?????i[L??C?V??????h?[?????w???}{z?{?$?
p??sd??
i?d?j?????
??{
??V?&|??qv?}??;w??G??_???j+
in??s\P?e?mkr|ph????????????=?{??
??1
??Fv?w
??????~r????????WV?o?g_]{csm?K???w?S?ske~eee??lYXw??????p?y???????U????????_?????YcVyZD?4?6?k??????o?n?3?WzI??Kv?5????p?bm??[CG_dQWlobedd???????????\?j?i????|??PP?KpKV?h??????????????????h?_Wsn1~|u??????????????????v????w?????6?????????{??g?|?l??c????h???{??z_?ohoa?{???????????????c?????????????_???jv???????x?&?;??lW[pqefvwpmop???????????k?r?s???????bv?^x_f?s??????????????????x?lg|yM??x???????????????|???????w?M??? ?5??????????pjslrk????rMIU`?Vl??????????????????o?\????????????Rp??a?}~?????????????????P?v?;??6w
????????????????V'^??w?x?j????????u?.?d^???wd?ldb??u??0
???pv????d?T?6?w?X?
?D???????
??W
QWOF??J*
????x???Q?O?}???O?O???}?O?P???}?Q?P?}[???g?i?????i?i?????i?g?????g?g???x????qm??Z?a\??m?|?z??#f$???????????????~I`Hf&????R?C??	?7????_??T?
`???`???????zMfL??Z?
?x
?*d
???q?GZN????????????{?S?XSI???????????????{c?s?????e
????????
???
?
0M??n??????G??u?HONX2%??=_?N?=M
???m3
?[_??x??0
?
i?????_!?=???vp???
?
0M??n??????G??u?HONX2N?[_??x??0
?
i?M?
?-???Z?
???o
{v
K?A|??l??
?`???Z?
?x
??@?????
???
l?jYh??????????p?qx|??????a
?I
?????{c?
|L
?e
???}v?2?
?h???m?????p??k?p????~??oqB|N??[_s
??I
????|?{c?
?L
|????*???
i?!??3
?[is
??J??????tL?(
?????nn????a????M
???J
??????y??O
?I
?????{c?P
?<?????pq?m
??N}?#???????p??*
?$???
?x
??@?????
???
l?jYh??????????p-
?K??J
?l
z??O
?I
?????{E?(
?????ub????????pq?m
?N?w??????q]?UUDb?*??}?9c?	?P???
3????????
U`f?????")/=EPY`v???????????
!(/48?ET^chlu~????????????????	
		
			"	&	/	3	<	C	I	N	R	V?C ? 
?#1
~
??(?Qf
]?
b?Q
?z
??!???????????~]X]DcN?}??????1????????????
^RtD?B?
??"????	?'I??|???????K???j?UWr]K???m??? ?8???(IX
y\JdB'?	?0??????_?1k?u?z?i?f?r}?^?W?C??????s)
7
y??)k?p??~?
qB%????M
?m????g??J?????y?}??a?W|m}z?????qqXeH?????{???zf?t?_???!=*?!?*,??5?
???X?]
?kS???????????wI??z??)?????oq????????}??V
??N???rd?V`
G??zEo1uBR?}?????]??c
\:??dQ?;
??A?U??????6?o?c?????????????O8
?
?>
?????
?.??}
?
?I?>??^?o???
uBN??????w?Tgg?S?uy~??|g

 
??`???????????tvw?wD
?l
mX|d?U????z???ue??S{?_???????????|]?U?]?Y??{?y??m??A??*XSI????????????????????
???H????
????????`?_?Y?V?=??//<??N????????
???>???tX?gD
[ig????????????rc?U`
???????????f???iU<
?[
H?h?h?'?
??Nm???}?U???????b??ha?~???
??~?gc?qrR??j??????????<
??J???c|v
?6??????????????=?y?Z????????????????{???z`?~?f?a?sg?sq?o?u?IAv?fK?????
?(,
???uu?d?R?g?yz?v?wg?NOabI?9????z%@4?	?`??WsL
?,QWj
?????y6
@
???sv???????wUDb?*???{v
S?O
??~{?l?h?r?1+?b??????????????*?????}??V
?Q?
?6?f???J??2w??4N?K
????????
??~?rP?kki??g???????????o
???????~?V?
??k?p??~?
qR?c?@??????w?O???wRF[??g?dQ?<
???????????{?|?~U???C??hv?G??lm??s?????????????}???????U?h?t?V?????????????????}?????
?,???t?d?L????^???????;?k????????[????????eh_??|??D?/?0?	-??d?fe??v?}????
??K
et????????nrlsojON????O??????????{???????????????4v????????????\???????????????J??o????|v?3?
??]??
??(?Q???v?Dw??~??????W?????~?~~}?e?pmj???????v?(??w??sk??wv?;?u
?D?v?fw
????????y??}??
[?
 

?

$
?

g

?
?


?











(
2
8
B
L
V
`
j
t
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
 *4>DNpz?????????????(2<FLn|??????$28
??


??
??
??
??
??
??
??
 
 





Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 18:40:05 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Vollkorn.pdf


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	1 Feb 2009 18:40:05 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+b06f4d12d6640399ea943deb84d36ca9  Vollkorn.pdf



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  1 23:16:20 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 23:16:20 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch, NONE, 
	1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090201231620.0451E7011B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25694

Modified Files:
	cjkuni-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch 
Log Message:
resolves: rhbz#475743
patched uming 64-...conf for less over-prioritized.


cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch:

--- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch ---
diff -up cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.2-rhbz475743 cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf
--- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.2-rhbz475743	2008-02-19 16:25:21.000000000 +1000
+++ cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf	2009-02-02 01:18:23.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,25 +1,40 @@
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
-	<alias>
-		<family>serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>sans-serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>monospace</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
+	<match>
+		<test name="lang" compare="contains">
+			<string>zh</string>
+		</test>
+		<test name="family">
+			<string>serif</string>
+		</test>
+		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+			<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+			<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+		</edit>
+	</match>
+	<match>
+		<test name="lang" compare="contains">
+			<string>zh</string>
+		</test>
+		<test name="family">
+			<string>sans-serif</string>
+		</test>
+		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+			<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+			<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+		</edit>
+	</match>
+	<match>
+		<test name="lang" compare="contains">
+			<string>zh</string>
+		</test>
+		<test name="family">
+			<string>monospace</string>
+		</test>
+		<edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+			<string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+			<string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+		</edit>
+	</match>
 </fontconfig>


Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec	22 Jan 2009 02:16:39 -0000	1.2
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 23:15:49 -0000	1.3
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 Name:        %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:     0.2.20080216.1
-Release:     17%{?dist}
+Release:     18%{?dist}
 Summary:     Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
 License:     Arphic
 Group:       User Interface/X
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 Source7:    CIDFnmap.zh_TW
 Source8:    CIDFnmap.zh_CN
 Patch1:     cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch
+Patch2:     cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch
 
 BuildRoot:        %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 BuildArch:        noarch
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir}
 %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667
+%patch2 -p1 -b .2-rhbz475743
 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir}
 
 %build
@@ -192,6 +194,10 @@
 %__rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11
+- Resolves: rhbz#475743
+- Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale.
+
 * Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#477373
 - Refined package dependencies and compat font symlinks.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb  2 01:27:10 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2009 01:27:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf, 1.1,
	1.2 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf, 1.1,
	1.2 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf, 1.1, 1.2 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,
	1.14, 1.15
Message-ID: <20090202012710.7B5567011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15580

Modified Files:
	65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf 
	65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-18.fc11
- Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates.




Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf	16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000	1.1
+++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf	2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
-<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
-<!--
-  Serif faces
- -->
-	<alias>
-		<family>Baekmuk Batang</family>
-		<default>
-            <family>serif</family>
-        </default>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>Baekmuk Batang</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
+  <match>
+    <test name="lang">
+      <string>ko</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>serif</string>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+      <string>Baekmuk Batang</string>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+  <alias>
+    <family>Baekmuk Batang</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
 </fontconfig>


Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf	16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000	1.1
+++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf	2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
-<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
-<!--
-  Sans-serif faces
- -->
-	<alias>
-		<family>Baekmuk Dotum</family>
-		<default>
-            <family>sans-serif</family>
-        </default>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>sans-serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>Baekmuk Dotum</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
+  <match>
+    <test name="lang">
+      <string>ko</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>sans-serif</string>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+      <string>Baekmuk Dotum</string>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+  <alias>
+    <family>Baekmuk Dotum</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>sans-serif</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
 </fontconfig>


Index: 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf	16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000	1.1
+++ 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf	2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,19 +1,21 @@
-<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
-<!--
-  monospace faces
- -->
-	<alias>
-		<family>Baekmuk Gulim</family>
-		<default>
-            <family>monospace</family>
-        </default>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>monospace</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>Baekmuk Gulim</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
+  <match>
+    <test name="lang">
+      <string>ko</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>monospace</string>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+      <string>Baekmuk Gulim</string>
+    </edit>
+  </match>
+  <alias>
+    <family>Baekmuk Gulim</family>
+    <default>
+      <family>monospace</family>
+    </default>
+  </alias>
 </fontconfig>


Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 00:01:04 -0000	1.14
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000	1.15
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        17%{?dist}
+Release:        18%{?dist}
 Summary:        Free Korean TrueType fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -152,6 +152,9 @@
 %__rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-18.fc11
+- Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates.
+
 * Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-17.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#477332
 - Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 08:07:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:07:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium
 Basic Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902020807.n128711a011271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 08:41:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:41:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483530] New: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character
 support
Message-ID: <bug-483530-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530

           Summary: Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: lohit-fonts
        AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


The Lohit Bengali font has dashes instead of glyphs for the actual Bengali
characters in the following positions:

U+09F2 BENGALI RUPEE MARK
U+09F3 BENGALI RUPEE SIGN
U+09F4 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE
U+09F5 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR TWO
U+09F6 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR THREE
U+09F8 BENGALI CURRENCY NUMERATOR ONE LESS THAN THE DENOMINATOR
U+09F9 BENGALI CURRENCY DENOMINATOR SIXTEEN

Either the glyphs should be designed and added to the font, or the dashes
should be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 08:53:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:53:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium
 Basic Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902020853.n128rlc9015372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-02 03:53:44 EDT ---
I'll look at it later but in the meanwhile no, I didn't revoque my approval

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 09:42:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:42:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483530] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support
In-Reply-To: <bug-483530-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483530-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902020942.n129gN2V028666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530





--- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 04:42:22 EDT ---
Yep, I noticed that recently. I am trying to get these and such missing glyphs
added to the font asap. Not sure why there were dashes put on those places.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb  2 15:04:28 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2009 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2,
	1.3 vollkorn.otf, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090202150428.D08F77011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3578

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Removed Files:
	vollkorn.otf 
Log Message:
removed vollkorn.otf from cvs repository



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore	1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000	1.2
+++ .cvsignore	2 Feb 2009 15:03:58 -0000	1.3
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 Vollkorn.pdf
+vollkorn.otf


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources	1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000	1.2
+++ sources	2 Feb 2009 15:03:58 -0000	1.3
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 b06f4d12d6640399ea943deb84d36ca9  Vollkorn.pdf
+ae1ff36998848463c56bb74bebcced6f  vollkorn.otf


--- vollkorn.otf DELETED ---



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb  2 15:16:53 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2009 15:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel vollkorn-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090202151653.51FA87011E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6691

Modified Files:
	vollkorn-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
update spec file


Index: vollkorn-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/vollkorn-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- vollkorn-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 22:24:14 -0000	1.1
+++ vollkorn-fonts.spec	2 Feb 2009 15:16:23 -0000	1.2
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.008
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        A serif latin font with good readability
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -61,5 +61,8 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 02 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 1.008-2
+move vollkorn.otf file out of the cvs repo
+
 * Fri Jan 30 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 1.008-1
 - initial packaging



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 15:26:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:26:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] New: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10
Message-ID: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589

           Summary: terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: terminus-font
        AssignedTo: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de
        ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

  On F-10, xterm, xlsfonts, emacs, cannot use the terminus
  font, even though terminus-font-x11 is installed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  terminus-font-x11-4.28-1.fc10.noarch

How reproducible:

  100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. xlsfonts  | grep terminus

Actual results:

  No output.

Expected results:

  A few dozen lines with terminus font names.

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 18:45:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-483400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902021845.n12Ijcwm001144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 18:45:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif
 decorative latin TTF font
In-Reply-To: <bug-483363-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483363-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902021845.n12IjxjR001232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 20:41:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:41:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472695] exa-master-upgrade breaks glyph rendering with OLPC XO
In-Reply-To: <bug-472695-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472695-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022041.n12KfLKW003188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472695





--- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>  2009-02-02 15:41:20 EDT ---
Daniel is this still an issue?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 22:39:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:39:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022239.n12MdxOG019561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |xgl-maint at redhat.com
          Component|pango                       |xorg-x11-drv-ati
         AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com         |airlied at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 22:44:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:44:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022244.n12MixhT028777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Fran?ois Cami <francois.cami at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |francois.cami at free.fr
               Flag|                            |needinfo?




--- Comment #37 from Fran?ois Cami <francois.cami at free.fr>  2009-02-02 17:44:56 EDT ---

Jan, could you test the latest build in Koji at :
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=95
( currently xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.10.0-2.fc10 )
and report.

If it still persists, please attach dmesg and /var/log/Xorg.0.log as
uncompressed attachments. Thanks :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 23:23:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:23:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022323.n12NNnvR027745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #51 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 18:23:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #50)
> Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this conf, check if the Chinese are
> not antialias within the range.

Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. BTW, would the first <match> too
over-ruled to force all non-uming have antialias enabled?

=====

The two <match> are somehow overlapped:

11 >= pixelsize <= 17

OR

8 >= pixelsize <= 12

becomes

8 >= pixelsize <- 17

which font sizes 8 - 17 would have antialias disabled?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 23:38:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:38:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating
 OpenType and PostScript fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-458430-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-458430-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022338.n12NcIaW030437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mcepl at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr)




--- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 18:38:15 EDT ---
Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 23:42:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:42:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium
 Basic Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022342.n12NgWZN008021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527





--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-02 18:42:30 EDT ---
1. you have a typo in you -common description

2. \ after %common_desc in book description is probably unnecessary

Otherwise this looks like a very fine package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 23:44:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:44:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022344.n12NiDaq031729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #52 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 18:44:12 EDT ---
This makes when uming pixelsize < 17, has antialias and hinting off. Please
kindly test:

=====

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>

  <match target="font">
    <test name="family">
      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
    </test>
    <edit name="autohint"><bool>false</bool></edit>
  </match>

  <match target="font">
    <test name="family">
      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
    </test>
    <test name="pixelsize" compare="more_eq"><int>17</int></test>
    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
  </match>

  <match target="font">
    <test name="family">
      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
    </test>
    <test name="pixelsize" compare="less"><int>17</int></test>
    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
  </match>

</fontconfig>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  2 23:48:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:48:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902022348.n12NmDRe009151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




--- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 18:48:12 EDT ---
Patched in rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 00:01:28 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 00:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch, NONE, 
	1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090203000128.0F6D570134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9162

Modified Files:
	cjkuni-fonts.spec 
Added Files:
	cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch 
Log Message:
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#459680
- Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17.


cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch:

--- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch ---
diff -up cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.3-rhbz459680 cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf
--- cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.3-rhbz459680	2009-02-03 09:53:25.000000000 +1000
+++ cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf	2009-02-03 09:56:12.000000000 +1000
@@ -2,14 +2,38 @@
 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
 
-	<match target="font">
-	  <test name="family">
-	  <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
-	  </test>
-    	  <edit name="hinting"><bool>true</bool></edit>
-          <edit name="autohint"><bool>false</bool></edit>
-	</match>
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="autohint"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+  </match>
+
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="pixelsize" compare="more_eq"><int>17</int></test>
+    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
+    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
+  </match>
+
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="pixelsize" compare="less"><int>17</int></test>
+    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+  </match>
+
 </fontconfig>


Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 23:15:49 -0000	1.3
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 00:00:57 -0000	1.4
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 Name:        %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:     0.2.20080216.1
-Release:     18%{?dist}
+Release:     19%{?dist}
 Summary:     Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
 License:     Arphic
 Group:       User Interface/X
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 Source8:    CIDFnmap.zh_CN
 Patch1:     cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch
 Patch2:     cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch
+Patch3:     cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch
 
 BuildRoot:        %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 BuildArch:        noarch
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@
 %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir}
 %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667
 %patch2 -p1 -b .2-rhbz475743
+%patch3 -p1 -b .3-rhbz459680
 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir}
 
 %build
@@ -194,6 +196,10 @@
 %__rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11
+- Resolves: rhbz#459680
+- Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17.
+
 * Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#475743
 - Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 00:20:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:20:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030020.n130KO8S015028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #330210|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #53 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 19:20:23 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=330696)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330696)
Screen with .conf in last comment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 00:24:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:24:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030024.n130OsxW006261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 19:24:53 EDT ---
thai-scalable-fonts is the correct new naming?

Assuming so I will create the new cvs module and import

http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts.spec
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thai-scalable-fonts-0.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm

which looks ok to me on rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 00:35:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:35:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating
 OpenType and PostScript fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-458430-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-458430-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030035.n130Z2bw008349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430


Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) |




--- Comment #10 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2009-02-02 19:35:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review?

No, I am ready to do the review. I am still waiting for an answer to Comment
#8, though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 01:10:04 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 01:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.1,
	1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1,
	1.2 cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, 1.2 cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1,
	1.2 cjkuni-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5
Message-ID: <20090203011004.1323870134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18191

Modified Files:
	CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN 
	FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW 
	cjkuni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#483329
- Reowned font directory by -common subpackage.
- Updated font paths in ghostscript files.




Index: CIDFnmap.zh_CN
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- CIDFnmap.zh_CN	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ CIDFnmap.zh_CN	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
 
 % Adobe-GB1
 
-/BousungEG-Light-GB	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf)	;
-/GBZenKai-Medium	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf)	;
+/BousungEG-Light-GB	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc)	;
+/GBZenKai-Medium	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc)	;
 
 /Adobe-GB1		/BousungEG-Light-GB	;
 /MSungGBK-Light		/BousungEG-Light-GB	;


Index: CIDFnmap.zh_TW
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- CIDFnmap.zh_TW	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ CIDFnmap.zh_TW	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
 
 % Adobe-CNS1
 
-/ZenKai-Medium		(/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf)	;
-/ShanHeiSun-Light	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf)	;
+/ZenKai-Medium		(/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc)	;
+/ShanHeiSun-Light	(/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc)	;
 
 /Adobe-CNS1		/ShanHeiSun-Light	;
 


Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
 %
 % Use regular Postscript syntax.
 %
-/BousungEG-Light-GB	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
-/GBZenKai-Medium	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/BousungEG-Light-GB	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/GBZenKai-Medium	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
 %
-/MSungGBK-Light		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
-/Adobe-GB1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/MSungGBK-Light		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/Adobe-GB1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;


Index: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 %
 % Use regular Postscript syntax.
 %
-/ZenKai-Medium		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
-/ShanHeiSun-Light	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
+/ZenKai-Medium		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
+/ShanHeiSun-Light	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
 %
-/Adobe-CNS1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
+/Adobe-CNS1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;


Index: cidfmap.zh_CN
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cidfmap.zh_CN,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- cidfmap.zh_CN	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ cidfmap.zh_CN	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-/BousungEG-Light-GB	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
-/GBZenKai-Medium	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/BousungEG-Light-GB	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
+/GBZenKai-Medium	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ;
 /MSungGBK-Light		/BousungEG-Light-GB ;
 /Adobe-GB1		/BousungEG-Light-GB ;
 


Index: cidfmap.zh_TW
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cidfmap.zh_TW,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- cidfmap.zh_TW	21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000	1.1
+++ cidfmap.zh_TW	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/ZenKai-Medium		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
-/ShanHeiSun-Light	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
+/ZenKai-Medium		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/ukai.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
+/ShanHeiSun-Light	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ;
 /Adobe-CNS1		/ShanHeiSun-Light ;
 


Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 00:00:57 -0000	1.4
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.5
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 Name:        %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:     0.2.20080216.1
-Release:     19%{?dist}
+Release:     20%{?dist}
 Summary:     Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
 License:     Arphic
 Group:       User Interface/X
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
 
 %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%dir %{_fontdir}
 %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
 %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
 %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
@@ -196,6 +197,11 @@
 %__rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11
+- Resolves: rhbz#483329
+- Reowned font directory by -common subpackage.
+- Updated font paths in ghostscript files.
+
 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#459680
 - Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 01:12:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:12:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030112.n131CmbM023699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 01:27:47 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 01:27:47 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090203012747.1738270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20596

Modified Files:
	cjkuni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
splited ghostscript files into subpackage



Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 01:09:33 -0000	1.5
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 01:27:16 -0000	1.6
@@ -87,6 +87,30 @@
 %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README
 %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO
 
+%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+Summary:      Chinese Unicode TrueType font ghostscript files.
+Group:        User Interface/X
+Requires:     fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13
+Requires:     ghostscript >= 8.63-4
+Requires:     %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:     %{fontname}-ukai-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:    cjkuni-fonts-common <= 0.2.20080216.1-19
+Obsoletes:    cjkuni-fonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-20 
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+%common_desc
+
+CJK Unifonts ghostscript files.
+
+%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW
+%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN
+%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW
+%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN
+%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW
+%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN
+
 %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 Summary:      Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files.
 Group:        User Interface/X
@@ -201,6 +225,7 @@
 - Resolves: rhbz#483329
 - Reowned font directory by -common subpackage.
 - Updated font paths in ghostscript files.
+- Splited ghostscript files into subpackage.
 
 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-19.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#459680



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 01:37:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:37:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories
In-Reply-To: <bug-483329-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483329-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030137.n131bsms028245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 20:37:53 EDT ---
1 and 2 have been resolved:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 01:54:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:54:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030154.n131sjIj021894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479





--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 20:54:45 EDT ---
hmm, so are you saying that "gothic" isn't a family name or just get rid of it
because of duplicate to the project name? then what I should do in this package
for new policy is just to make the package name lower-case. I'd a bit prefer
vlgothic-proportional-fonts rather than vlgothic-p-fonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 02:08:32 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel FAPIcidfmap.ko, 1.1,
	1.2 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec, 1.15, 1.16 cidfmap.ko, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090203020832.6561270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26743

Modified Files:
	FAPIcidfmap.ko baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec cidfmap.ko 
Log Message:
resolves: rhbz#483327
updated ghostscript font paths
splited ghostscripts into subpackage



Index: FAPIcidfmap.ko
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/FAPIcidfmap.ko,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- FAPIcidfmap.ko	24 Sep 2007 06:46:22 -0000	1.1
+++ FAPIcidfmap.ko	3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 -0000	1.2
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
 %
 % Use regular Postscript syntax.
 %
-/Baekmuk-Batang		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Dotum		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Gulim		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Headline	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Batang		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Dotum		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Gulim		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Headline	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 %
-/Baekmuk-Batang-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
-/Baekmuk-Headline-Regular	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Batang-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Headline-Regular	<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 %
-/Adobe-Korea1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Adobe-Korea1		<< /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;


Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	2 Feb 2009 01:26:40 -0000	1.15
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 -0000	1.16
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        18%{?dist}
+Release:        19%{?dist}
 Summary:        Free Korean TrueType fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -84,12 +84,34 @@
 
 %_font_pkg -n hline -f *-%{fontname}-hline*.conf hline.ttf
 
+%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+Summary:        Ghostscript files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       ghostscript >= 8.63-4
+Requires:       %{fontname}-batang-fonts = %{version}-%{release} 
+Requires:       %{fontname}-dotum-fonts = %{version}-%{release} 
+Requires:       %{fontname}-gulim-fonts = %{version}-%{release} 
+Requires:       %{fontname}-hline-fonts = %{version}-%{release} 
+Conflicts:      baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common <= 2.2-18
+Obsoletes:      baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common < 2.2-19
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+%common_desc
+
+This is ghostscript files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts.
+
+%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-ghostscript
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%{gsdir}/cidfmap.ko
+%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.ko
+
 %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 Summary:        Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts
 Group:          User Interface/X
 Conflicts:      fonts-korean < 2.2-5
 Obsoletes:      ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5
 Obsoletes:      baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 %common_desc
@@ -99,10 +121,10 @@
 %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README
+%dir %{_fontdir}
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname}
-%{gsdir}/
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n %{archivename}
@@ -152,6 +174,12 @@
 %__rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-19.fc11
+- Resolves: rhbz#483327
+- Reowned font directory by subpackage -common.
+- Splited ghostscript files to subpackage -ghostscript.
+- Updated paths in ghostscript files.
+
 * Mon Feb 02 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-18.fc11
 - Updated fontconfig .conf files based on fontpackages templates.
 


Index: cidfmap.ko
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/cidfmap.ko,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- cidfmap.ko	24 Sep 2007 06:46:22 -0000	1.1
+++ cidfmap.ko	3 Feb 2009 02:08:02 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-/Baekmuk-Batang		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-batang/batang.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Batang		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/batang.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 /Baekmuk-Batang-Regular		/Baekmuk-Batang ;
-/Baekmuk-Dotum		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-dotum/dotum.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Dotum		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/dotum.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 /Baekmuk-Dotum-Regular		/Baekmuk-Dotum ;
-/Baekmuk-Gulim		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-gulim/gulim.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Gulim		<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/gulim.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 /Baekmuk-Gulim-Regular		/Baekmuk-Gulim ;
-/Baekmuk-Headline	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf-hline/hline.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
+/Baekmuk-Headline	<< /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/hline.ttf) /CSI [(Korea1) 2] >> ;
 /Baekmuk-Headline-Regular	/Baekmuk-Headline ;
 /Adobe-Korea1			/Baekmuk-Batang ;
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 02:13:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:13:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories
In-Reply-To: <bug-483327-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483327-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030213.n132DTf1025340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 21:13:28 EDT ---
1 & 2 have been resolved:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 03:28:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030328.n133SPVW007480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #54 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2009-02-02 22:28:22 EDT ---
>1.Could you kindly have a test? Thanks. 
:( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal
laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing.

>2.BTW, would the first <match> too over-ruled to force all non-uming have 
>antialias enabled?
Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other
fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated...

>3. The two <match> are somehow overlapped
I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize".

And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE
LiveCD.

How about yours?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 03:47:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:47:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030347.n133lvW5022545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #55 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 22:47:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> :( Sorry, since I got a new job, I have no additional resources... My personal
> laptop is running F8 with KDE 3.5. I only have a livecd for testing.

That' alright.

>2.BTW, would the first <match> too over-ruled to force all non-uming have 
> >antialias enabled?
> Yup. It seems that, this 25-ttfxxx-bitmap.conf disabled the antialias for other
> fonts in my f10 kde livecd. Where is this bug originated...

The .conf in comment #52 should not affect global antialias configuration.

> >3. The two <match> are somehow overlapped
> I'm not sure of that. Since the targets are "size", and "pixelsize".

Hmm I should get back and check what is the differences.

> And The first "not_eq" match should be there to enabled antialias on F10 KDE
> LiveCD.

I personally think whether antialias is enabled or not globally, should not be
controlled by cjkuni-fonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 03:57:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:57:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030357.n133vUq0024463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #56 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-02 22:57:29 EDT ---
Still looking for extra testing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 04:24:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:24:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium
 Basic Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030424.n134O4E4022081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-02 23:24:03 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 05:23:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:23:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030523.n135NFu8001346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #57 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2009-02-03 00:23:14 EDT ---
Maybe, the reason for disabling antialias for other fonts is: Uming has alias
as Serif San fonts in the other conf file.

And KDE/Qt apps vs GNOME/GTK apps have different fonts display on Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 07:15:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:15:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030715.n137FeL3023542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479





--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-03 02:15:39 EDT ---
read the naming guidelines carefully; you'll see we try very hard to avoid
unnecessary repetitions, and to get something close to what the font files
declare in their metadata

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 08:50:43 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:50:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030850.n138oh9w010739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479





--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 03:50:42 EDT ---
Just to explain that AFAIK the only difference between the two faces is in the
non-Japanese glyphs, so it only affects apps where the font is explicitly
chosen, eg openoffice and user config of fonts in other apps.

VL Gothic is a fixed width font (ie Latin glyphs are half-width of Japanese
character, so good for monospace)
VL PGothic is variable width in Latin glyphs (so more natural for sans,serif)
(Japanese glyphs are always fixed and full width)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 09:21:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:21:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030921.n139Lc3A026675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477465, which changed state.

Bug 477465 Summary: [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 09:21:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:21:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477465-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902030921.n139LbRx026648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 04:21:35 EDT ---
It is imported and built now for rawhide: did the EOL process for the old
package and added now one to comps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From rbhalera at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 09:30:20 2009
From: rbhalera at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Bhalerao)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 09:30:20 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel 59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf, 
	NONE, 1.1 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090203093020.D3DA370134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: rbhalera

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22223

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf 
	sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Initial upload


--- NEW FILE 59-sil-gentium-basic-book.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/59-sil-gentium-book-basic.conf
     ?? 2008-2009 Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com>
-->
<fontconfig>
  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
  <alias>
    <family>Gentium Book Basic</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Gentium Book Basic</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE 59-sil-gentium-basic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/conf.d/59-sil-gentium-basic.conf
     ?? 2008-2009 Rahul Bhalerao <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com>
-->
<fontconfig>
  <!-- Font substitution rules -->
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>Gentium</family>
    <accept>
      <family>Gentium Basic</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>Gentium Alt</family>
    <accept>
      <family>Gentium Basic</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
  <!-- Generic name assignment -->
  <alias>
    <family>Gentium Basic</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <!-- Generic name aliasing -->
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Gentium Basic</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname sil-gentium-basic
%define fontconf 59-%{fontname}

%define common_desc \
Gentium Basic and Gentium Book Basic are font families based on the\
original Gentium design, but with additional weights. Both families come \
with a complete regular, bold, italic and bold italic set of fonts. \
These "Basic" fonts support only the Basic Latin and Latin-1 Supplement \
Unicode ranges, plus a selection of the more commonly used extended Latin\
characters, with miscellaneous diacritical marks, symbols and punctuation.


Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.1
Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL

Group:     User Interface/X
License:   OFL
URL:       http://scripts.sil.org/Gentium_Basic
Source0:   GentiumBasic_110.zip
Source1:   %{fontconf}.conf
Source2:   %{fontconf}-book.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
BuildArch:     noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel

Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description
%common_desc

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf GenBas*.ttf

%package common
Summary:  SIL Genitum Basic fonts, common files (documentation???)
Group:    User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package  -n %{fontname}-book-fonts
Summary:  SIL Gentium Basic Family fonts
Group:    User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-book-fonts
%common_desc\
The "Book" family is slightly heavier.

%_font_pkg -n book -f %{fontconf}-book.conf GenBkBas*.ttf


%prep
%setup -q -n "Gentium Basic 1.1"
for txt in *.txt ; do
        fold -s $txt > $txt.new
        sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new
        touch -r $txt $txt.new
        mv $txt.new $txt
done

# Convert to UTF-8
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 GENTIUM-FAQ.txt -o GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_
touch -r GENTIUM-FAQ.txt GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_
mv GENTIUM-FAQ.txt_ GENTIUM-FAQ.txt

%build
echo "Nothing to do in Build."

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

# Repeat for every font family

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \
         %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-book.conf

for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf\
         %{fontconf}-book.conf ; do
  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done

%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc FONTLOG.txt GENTIUM-FAQ.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt


%dir %{_fontdir}


%changelog
* Fri Jan 30 2009 <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com> - 1.1-3.fc11
- Changed the naming for srpm.

* Wed Jan 28 2009 <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com> - 1.1-2.fc11
- Changes according to package naming guidelines post-1.13  fontpackages.

* Tue Jan 06 2009 <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com> - 1.1-1.fc11
- Following new packaging guidelines.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	3 Feb 2009 04:24:21 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	3 Feb 2009 09:29:50 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+GentiumBasic_110.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	3 Feb 2009 04:24:21 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	3 Feb 2009 09:29:50 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+44b3bc7b766f411f57e6eae28768dfbb  GentiumBasic_110.zip



From pravins at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 09:35:29 2009
From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 09:35:29 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090203093529.35B7270134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: pravins

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24456

Modified Files:
	samyak-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-3
- renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline
- updated spec



Index: samyak-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- samyak-fonts.spec	12 Jan 2009 10:45:29 -0000	1.6
+++ samyak-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 09:34:58 -0000	1.7
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:	 %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	1.2.1
-Release:	2%{?dist}
+Release:	3%{?dist}
 Summary:	Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
 Group:	User Interface/X
 License:	GPLv3+ with exceptions
@@ -21,70 +21,80 @@
 %description
 %common_desc
 
-%package common
+%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
 Summary:  Common files for smc-fonts
 Group:  User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
-
-%description common
+Provides: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
 %common_desc
 
-%package devanagari
+%package -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
-%description devanagari
+Provides: %{name}-devanagari = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts
 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \
 Scripts Devanagari.
 
-%package tamil
+%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf 
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
-%description tamil
+Provides: %{name}-tamil = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \
 Scripts Tamil.
 
+%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf 
 
-%package malayalam
+%package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
-%description malayalam
+Provides: %{name}-malayalam = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \
 Scripts Malayalam.
 
-%package gujarati
+%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf 
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
-%description gujarati
+Provides: %{name}-gujarati = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \
 Scripts Gujarati.
 
-%package oriya
+%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf 
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
-%description oriya
+Provides: %{name}-oriya = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3
+%description -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
 This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \
 Scripts Oriya.
 
-%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf 
-
-%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf 
-
-%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf 
-
 %_font_pkg -n oriya %{fontname}-oriya/*.ttf 
 
-%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf 
-
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n samyak-fonts-%{version}
@@ -105,12 +115,16 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 
-%files common
+%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
 %defattr(-,root,root,-) 
 %doc COPYING README AUTHORS
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-3
+- renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline
+- updated spec
+
 * Mon Jan 12 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-2
 - bugzilla 477451
 - updated spec



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 10:20:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:20:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031020.n13AKNA7008582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-02-03 05:20:22 EDT ---
It seems that with baekmuk-ttf-XXX-2.2-19.fc11,
cjkuni-XXXX-0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11 Japanese glyphs are shown
correctly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 12:01:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:01:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031201.n13C1TZE002385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-03 07:01:26 EDT ---
just a warning: FPC and fesco demanded for subpackages that contain fonts to be
renamed foo-fonts, but the common subpackage does not contain any font and
should keep its old naming

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 12:46:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:46:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031246.n13CkXvY003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400





--- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 07:46:32 EDT ---
I found the following Debian bug regarding the imlib2 fonts:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393743

I will follow the Debian's example and drop the fonts (and images when we're at
it) from the package -- they're required by the demo programs only.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 13:53:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:53:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477400-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031353.n13DrBDA032109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400


Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 08:53:10 EDT ---
Should be fixed in imlib2-1.4.2-3.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 13:53:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:53:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031353.n13DrCFB032135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477400, which changed state.

Bug 477400 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From mclasen at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb  3 16:12:37 2009
From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen)
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2009 16:12:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.83, 1.84 pango.spec, 1.151,
	1.152 sources, 1.84, 1.85
Message-ID: <20090203161237.919F670134@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mclasen

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24101

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore pango.spec sources 
Log Message:

1.23.0CVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.83
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -r1.83 -r1.84
--- .cvsignore	16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000	1.83
+++ .cvsignore	3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000	1.84
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pango-1.22.4.tar.bz2
+pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2


Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.151
retrieving revision 1.152
diff -u -r1.151 -r1.152
--- pango.spec	16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000	1.151
+++ pango.spec	3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000	1.152
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
 
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
-Version: 1.22.4
+Version: 1.23.0
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
-Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.22/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
 URL: http://www.pango.org
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 
 
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb  3 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.23.0-1
+- Update to 1.23.0
+
 * Tue Dec 16 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.22.4-1
 - Update to 1.22.4
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.84
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -r1.84 -r1.85
--- sources	16 Dec 2008 07:27:02 -0000	1.84
+++ sources	3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000	1.85
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7c3f3748052799746d73c6d3a0cc1205  pango-1.22.4.tar.bz2
+358a87607c0a5b4889bab52b1cf5e921  pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb  3 18:43:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:43:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902031843.n13IhHZA006884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?                   |




--- Comment #38 from Michal Jaegermann <michal at harddata.com>  2009-02-03 13:43:14 EDT ---
I tried to check if I still can find some font damage but as long as
gnome-settings-daemon refuses to start (see bug 471676) there is not much I can
do.  Any font property changes, and much more, are just ignored.

OTOH, as I noted before, I stopped seeing the problem a while ago.  At least
nothing blatant like it used to show up.  Still others apparently stumbled into
the same issue after that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 00:51:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:51:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040051.n140pdlA026617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #30 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 19:51:38 EDT ---
There are .conf templates from package fontpackages. I applied from that.

cjkuni-fonts is patched:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269

baekmuk-ttf-fonts is patched:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81270

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 00:52:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:52:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040052.n140qd01021951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #58 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 19:52:38 EDT ---
Wait for feedback from rawhide users:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81266

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 01:18:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:18:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040118.n141IP87031400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state.

Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 01:18:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:18:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040118.n141IOM8031366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 20:18:23 EDT ---
latest;

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81269

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 02:15:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040215.n142FHZM008147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state.

Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 02:15:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040215.n142FGBW008109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #16 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 21:15:15 EDT ---
latest: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb  4 02:39:27 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2009 02:39:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.32,1.33
Message-ID: <20090204023927.1538A70130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26909

Modified Files:
	liberation-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
created subpackage -compat as meta-package for installing all font families



Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33
--- liberation-fonts.spec	20 Jan 2009 22:53:43 -0000	1.32
+++ liberation-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 02:38:56 -0000	1.33
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 Name:             %{fontname}-fonts
 Summary:          Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
 Version:          1.04.93
-Release:          6%{?dist}
+Release:          7%{?dist}
 # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two 
 # exceptions:
 # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -34,9 +34,6 @@
 Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace 
 families.
 
-%files
-%{nil}
-
 %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 Summary:          Shared common files of Liberation font families.
 Group:            User Interface/X
@@ -55,6 +52,21 @@
 %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale
 %{catalogue}/%{name}
 
+%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
+Summary:          Compatibility files of Liberation font families.
+Group:            User Interface/X
+Requires:         %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts = 1.04.93-6
+Conflicts:        liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
+%common_desc
+
+Meta-package for installing all three font families: Sans, Serif, Mono.
+
+%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
+%{nil}
+
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 Summary:      Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial
 Group:        User Interface/X
@@ -115,6 +127,9 @@
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-7.fc11
+- Create -compat subpackage as meta-package for installing all font families.
+
 * Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-6.fc11
 - Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 02:40:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:40:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040240.n142e5w8012297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 02:40:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:40:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040240.n142e6lT012334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state.

Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 02:45:52 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:45:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040245.n142jq83008107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
                 CC|                            |skvidal at fedoraproject.org
          Component|liberation-fonts            |comps
         AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com          |notting at redhat.com
          QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com




--- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 21:45:51 EDT ---
hi rel-eng, please rename rpm in comps.xml from 'liberation-fonts' to
'liberation-fonts-compat':

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81453

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb  4 03:16:07 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2009 03:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.33,1.34
Message-ID: <20090204031607.7EBB070141@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1087

Modified Files:
	liberation-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Fixed inter-package dependencies problem of last update.



Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34
--- liberation-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 02:38:56 -0000	1.33
+++ liberation-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 03:15:37 -0000	1.34
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 Name:             %{fontname}-fonts
 Summary:          Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
 Version:          1.04.93
-Release:          7%{?dist}
+Release:          8%{?dist}
 # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two 
 # exceptions:
 # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
 Summary:          Shared common files of Liberation font families.
 Group:            User Interface/X
 Requires:         fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13
+Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts >= 1.04.93-6
+Conflicts:        liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 %common_desc
@@ -56,8 +58,9 @@
 Summary:          Compatibility files of Liberation font families.
 Group:            User Interface/X
 Requires:         %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
-Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts = 1.04.93-6
-Conflicts:        liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7
+Requires:         %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
 %common_desc
@@ -127,6 +130,9 @@
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-8.fc11
+- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies.
+
 * Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-7.fc11
 - Create -compat subpackage as meta-package for installing all font families.
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 03:52:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:52:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040352.n143qcIP026906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
          Component|fontconfig                  |cjkuni-fonts
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
         AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com         |cchance at redhat.com




--- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-03 22:52:37 EDT ---
No comment from Behdad so can probably close this for now.

Dunno if it is worth discussing the change of behaviour upstream...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 05:50:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:50:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040550.n145oJvT007525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451





--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com>  2009-02-04 00:50:18 EDT ---
oops, i changed samyak-fonts-common also to samyak-common-fonts
ok i will change it to samyak-fonts-common again

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From pravins at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb  4 08:16:53 2009
From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute)
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2009 08:16:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090204081653.7225570130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: pravins

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20471

Modified Files:
	samyak-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-4
- renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common



Index: samyak-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- samyak-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 09:34:58 -0000	1.7
+++ samyak-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 08:16:22 -0000	1.8
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:	 %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	1.2.1
-Release:	3%{?dist}
+Release:	4%{?dist}
 Summary:	Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
 Group:	User Interface/X
 License:	GPLv3+ with exceptions
@@ -21,19 +21,19 @@
 %description
 %common_desc
 
-%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+%package common
 Summary:  Common files for smc-fonts
 Group:  User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
-Provides: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
-Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 1.2.1-3
-%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+Provides: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: %{fontname}-common-fonts < 1.2.1-4
+%description common
 %common_desc
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-devanagari-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{name}-devanagari = %{version}-%{release}
 Obsoletes: %{name}-devanagari < 1.2.1-3
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 %package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{name}-tamil = %{version}-%{release}
 Obsoletes: %{name}-tamil < 1.2.1-3
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 %package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{name}-malayalam = %{version}-%{release}
 Obsoletes: %{name}-malayalam < 1.2.1-3
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
 %package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{name}-gujarati = %{version}-%{release}
 Obsoletes: %{name}-gujarati < 1.2.1-3
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 %package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
 Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script
 Group: User Interface/X 
-Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 License: GPLv3+ with exceptions
 Provides: %{name}-oriya = %{version}-%{release}
 Obsoletes: %{name}-oriya < 1.2.1-3
@@ -115,12 +115,15 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 
-%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts
+%files common
 %defattr(-,root,root,-) 
 %doc COPYING README AUTHORS
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-4
+- renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common
+
 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-3
 - renamed font package as per fedora new Font_package_naming guideline
 - updated spec



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 08:25:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:25:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040825.n148PBMS006785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473


Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




--- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com>  2009-02-04 03:25:10 EDT ---
Tvtime contains two fonts: FreeMonoBold and tvtimeSansBold.  They're both
originate from the GNU FreeFont collection -- FreeMonoBold can be replaced by
the one we have in freefont package.  The problem is with tvtimeSansBold which
is FreeSansBold with additional glyphs used as "icons" in the OSD menus.

I'm not sure how to solve this issue properly...:

- Create tvtime fonts subpackage with the two fonts placed somewhere in
/usr/share/fonts which would have zero impact on the tvtime and its users but
the FreeMonoBold may happen to be installed twice

- Make tvtime depend on the freefont package and use both fonts from there,
which would mean that the OSD would not look so fancy (no big change in
usability though) and the user would have to install rather big font package

- Make tvtime depend on the freefont package but use only FreeMonoBold from
there and then either:
  a) have tvtimeSansBold packaged spearately
  b) have tvtimeSansBold packaged with tvtime

ad a) This solution makes little sense to me: the tvtimeSansBold has no value
for any application but tvtime and still the user would have to install 3.5 MB
freefont package

ad b) The user would have to install 3.5 MB additional fonts but FreeMonoBold
would be packaged just once and tvtime would carry its specific font with it.

Which way should I prefer?  Could you please give me some advice?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 08:31:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:31:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902040831.n148VCPi002187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451





--- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com>  2009-02-04 03:31:11 EDT ---
built it for rawhide with update

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 13:47:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:47:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902041347.n14Dldix016135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 13:49:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:49:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902041349.n14DnB1x009927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479





--- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-04 08:49:11 EDT ---
Ok, I see.

Filed a package review for renaming. Bug#484042.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 15:20:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:20:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 unusable on F-10
In-Reply-To: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902041520.n14FKVIl032136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-04 10:20:30 EDT ---
As I am now actually using F-10 on a day-to-day basis, I will be able to fix
this issue.

This might not be fixed in this (old) "terminus-font" package, though, as the
package needs to be renamed to fit in with Fedora's new guidelines on naming
and packaging fonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 15:27:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:27:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902041527.n14FRmBx008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-04 10:27:47 EDT ---
So far, the package names were as follows:

  SRPM: terminus-font
  RPM:  terminus-font-x11
        (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
  RPM:  terminus-font-console
        (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)

The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".

I can't see any foundry, upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", so my package would
need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?

Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
sound better and be less redundant and confusing.

Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.

But what happens with the console fonts? %{name}-console would violate the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. Or are all the
"fonts" rules only applying to X11 fonts anyway and there are no rules for
console fonts? I could do a "-n terminus-font-console" to keep the old package
name in the latter case.

Anyway, I'd really like to build the package with the console fonts in the same
source package if possible.

[1] http://www.is-vn.bg/hamster/

(Partly) related bugs:
  bug 477433: nted's "convert to new font pkg guidelines" bug
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c5
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c7
  bug 483589: current terminus-font-x11's registering of the X11 fonts broken
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589#c0

If any part of this is better discussed on fedora-fonts-list, feel free to do
so. I am subscribed there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From behdad at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb  4 19:07:54 2009
From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod)
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2009 19:07:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.152,1.153
Message-ID: <20090204190754.6364070130@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: behdad

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11718

Modified Files:
	pango.spec 
Log Message:
* Wed Feb  4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 1.23.0-2
- Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango



Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.152
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -r1.152 -r1.153
--- pango.spec	3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000	1.152
+++ pango.spec	4 Feb 2009 19:07:24 -0000	1.153
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
 Version: 1.23.0
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@
 %doc pango-view/HELLO.txt
 %{_libdir}/libpango*-*.so.*
 %{_bindir}/pango-querymodules*
+%{_bindir}/pango-view
 %{_libdir}/pango
 %doc %{_mandir}/man1/*
 
@@ -219,11 +220,13 @@
 %{_libdir}/libpango*.so
 %{_includedir}/*
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*
-%{_bindir}/pango-view
 %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pango
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb  4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 1.23.0-2
+- Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango
+
 * Tue Feb  3 2009 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 1.23.0-1
 - Update to 1.23.0
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 19:19:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:19:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902041919.n14JJ6gO001483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410





--- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com>  2009-02-04 14:19:05 EDT ---
As the package maintainer, you can do that...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 20:28:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:28:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484109] New: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all
 installed liberation fonts
Message-ID: <bug-484109-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed liberation fonts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109

           Summary: liberation-fonts update in reality erases all
                    installed liberation fonts
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: michal at harddata.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

Before an update there were installed liberation-fonts-1.04.93-6.fc11 and 
liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-6.fc11. The current update "obsoleted"
liberation-fonts and "replaced" it with liberation-fonts-common.  In yum.log:

Feb 04 12:55:50 Installed: liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-8.fc11.noarch
Feb 04 12:58:20 Erased: liberation-fonts

Only there are no actual fonts after these operations.  It appears that the
idea was to replace those with 'liberation-fonts-compat' package.  A typo in
specs?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-fonts-1.04.93-8.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 20:43:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:43:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed
 liberation fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484109-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484109-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042043.n14Khw0P021581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-04 15:43:57 EDT ---
Yes, the latest liberation rawhide package releases are "strange"

I'll probably won't be able to find the time soonish to try to understand them.

Caius: how about you just follow the templates strictly, taking inspiration
from how mgopen (or dejavu, or vera...) obsoleted cleanly their old monolithic
fonts package, instead of trying to come up with a new obsoletion pattern?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:09:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:09:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042109.n14L9Dic022512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tagoh at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-04 16:09:12 EDT ---
I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too.

Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane.

(catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the
package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template,
but that does not change the result)

??? APPROVED ???

Please do not forget to update comps

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:18:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:18:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042118.n14LIE8Z030173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-04 16:18:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So far, the package names were as follows:
> 
>   SRPM: terminus-font
>   RPM:  terminus-font-x11
>         (X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
>   RPM:  terminus-font-console
>         (console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)
> 
> The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
> [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".
> 
> I can't see any foundry,

foundry is just a shorthand for upstream, if an upstream releases several fonts
so they are clearly grouped together. It is optional

> upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
> fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname",

Font family name is nothing special that's how your font calls itself in GUI
font lists. You can't have a font file without a familyname or apps would not
know how to refer to it.

> so my package would
> need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?

"When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts
affix, this affix should be dropped from them"

Don't panic and just read attentively
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Clarifications you'll see
this kind of case is covered

> Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
> sound better and be less redundant and confusing.
> 
> Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
> call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
> [foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.

This is ok

> But what happens with the console fonts?

Console fonts can't be processed by fontconfig so they're not a "font" covered
by the guidelines and you can name the subpackage that contains them whatever
you want, as long as it's not some form of foo-fonts

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:29:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:29:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042129.n14LT7sX026922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |477473




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:29:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:29:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042129.n14LT6Bi026906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |477336
               Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |
                   |aposte.net)                 |




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-04 16:29:05 EDT ---
1. For FreeMonoBold the case is clear-cut: just add a dep on the canonical
package providing it and symlink it from there (but you probably want to wait
till bug #477336 is resolved)

2. for tvtimeSansBold you need to split it in a subpackage that conforms to
fonts packaging guidelines, and likewise make your main package depend on this
subpackage and symlink the file from here

(of course that's assuming the special icons are worth it)

If you decide to drop the icons, the second subpackage is not necessary (we
won't ship tvtimeSansBold at all) and you probably also want to think on
replacing FreeMonoBold by DejaVu Sans Mono Bold which will already be installed
on most user systems, bringing your download requirements even lower

(so depend on dejavu-sans-mono-fonts and symlink from here)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:37:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:37:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042137.n14LbwaL028876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com>  2009-02-04 16:37:57 EDT ---
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.  I'm pretty busy at the moment,
and this is low on my personal priority list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:50:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:50:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042150.n14LogBd004742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-04 16:50:41 EDT ---
Maybe Jeffrey or Jon can step in as co-maintainers since their packages depend
on yours?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb  4 21:55:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:55:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902042155.n14LtraX005883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482





--- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-04 16:55:53 EDT ---
Ah, thanks!

I'll submit for review an SRPM updated to today's standards when I am back from
FOSDEM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:14:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050214.n152E5TC026801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:14:05 EDT ---
sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:13:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DIvN026608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:13:17 EDT ---
sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:13:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
In-Reply-To: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481484-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DKDW026640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:12:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True
 Type Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CHfv020719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115





--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:12:16 EDT ---
allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:12:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True
 Type Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CJeN020751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:18:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:18:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
In-Reply-To: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050218.n152IKIi023118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748





--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:18:20 EDT ---
yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:19:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
In-Reply-To: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050219.n152J3FO023480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|UPSTREAM                    |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:20:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050220.n152KphG029816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501





--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:20:50 EDT ---
dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9
testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update
dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'.  You can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1341

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:25:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt
In-Reply-To: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478748-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050225.n152PdDS032298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748





--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:25:38 EDT ---
yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:24:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:24:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True
 Type Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483115-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050224.n152OTbc031721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115





--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:24:29 EDT ---
allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 02:23:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050223.n152NJhv031279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-04 21:23:18 EDT ---
dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10
testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'.
 You can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1372

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb  5 03:15:28 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Thu,  5 Feb 2009 03:15:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.34,1.35
Message-ID: <20090205031529.1EC847011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7128

Modified Files:
	liberation-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-9.fc11
- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu.




Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35
--- liberation-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 03:15:37 -0000	1.34
+++ liberation-fonts.spec	5 Feb 2009 03:14:57 -0000	1.35
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 Name:             %{fontname}-fonts
 Summary:          Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
 Version:          1.04.93
-Release:          8%{?dist}
+Release:          9%{?dist}
 # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two 
 # exceptions:
 # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -21,12 +21,9 @@
 URL:              https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
 Source0:          liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz
 
-Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4
-Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts-serif < 1.04.93-4 
-Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts-mono < 1.04.93-4 
 BuildRoot:        %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 BuildArch:        noarch
-Buildrequires:    fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils
+BuildRequires:    fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils
 
 %description
 %common_desc
@@ -38,8 +35,6 @@
 Summary:          Shared common files of Liberation font families.
 Group:            User Interface/X
 Requires:         fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13
-Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts >= 1.04.93-6
-Conflicts:        liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-7
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common
 %common_desc
@@ -57,10 +52,10 @@
 %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
 Summary:          Compatibility files of Liberation font families.
 Group:            User Interface/X
-Requires:         %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires:         %{fontname}-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires:         %{fontname}-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires:         %{fontname}-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:        liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat
 %common_desc
@@ -74,6 +69,9 @@
 Summary:      Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial
 Group:        User Interface/X
 Requires:     %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:    liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:    liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides:     liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -86,6 +84,9 @@
 Summary:      Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman
 Group:        User Interface/X
 Requires:     %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:    liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:    liberation-serif-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides:     liberation-serif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -99,6 +100,9 @@
 Summary:      Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New
 Group:        User Interface/X
 Requires:     %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Conflicts:    liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Obsoletes:    liberation-mono-fonts < 1.04.93-8
+Provides:     liberation-mono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -130,6 +134,9 @@
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-9.fc11
+- Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu.
+
 * Wed Feb 04 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-8.fc11
 - Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies.
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 06:44:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:44:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050644.n156iTFB007321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state.

Bug 477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 06:44:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:44:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050644.n156iSAv007291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-05 01:44:27 EDT ---
The package is now updated to new guidelines.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 08:18:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:18:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902050818.n158IKfa027331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473





--- Comment #6 from Tomas Smetana <tsmetana at redhat.com>  2009-02-05 03:18:19 EDT ---
Thank you Nicolas.  I didn't know about the FAQ...  I will try to out some
other fonts to see how it looks like -- they're used in OSD only so the metrics
is quite important.  But it might be the best solution after all.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb  5 09:28:09 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Thu,  5 Feb 2009 09:28:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090205092809.B91ED1F82DD@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From nim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb  5 20:12:09 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Thu,  5 Feb 2009 20:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 fontpackages.spec, 1.8,
	1.9 import.log, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.7, 1.8 fontconfig.prov, 1.1,
	NONE macros.fontconfig, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090205201209.9F4AA7011F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30021/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources 
Removed Files:
	fontconfig.prov macros.fontconfig 
Log Message:
1.18


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- .cvsignore	21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000	1.7
+++ .cvsignore	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- fontpackages.spec	27 Jan 2009 09:49:32 -0000	1.8
+++ fontpackages.spec	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.9
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 %define rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
-Version: 1.16
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Version: 1.18
+Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
 Group:     Development/System
@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
 License:   LGPLv3+
 URL:       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
 Source0:   http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
-Source1:   fontconfig.prov
-Source2:   macros.fontconfig
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
@@ -58,7 +56,7 @@
 for dir in fontbasedir        fontconfig_masterdir \
            fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do
   export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \
-    macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
+    rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
 done
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \
@@ -70,9 +68,7 @@
                    %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates
 install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec  %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir}
 install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir}
-install -m 0644 -p macros/macros*         %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
-install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE1}          %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov
-install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE2}          %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig
+install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros*            %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
 
 cat <<EOF > %{name}-%{version}.files
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
@@ -89,8 +85,6 @@
 %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig
-%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov
-%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig
 
 
 %files devel
@@ -99,10 +93,22 @@
 %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec
 %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros*
 %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir}
-%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 5 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.18-1
+??? Panu wants autoprovides in rpm proper, drop it
+??? Guidelines people are ok with multiple ownership of directories, make the
+  fonts macro auto-own the directory font files are put into
+
+* Sat Jan 31 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.17-1
+??? Tweak and complete documentation
+??? Merge the autoprovides stuff and try to make it actually work
+
 * Tue Jan 27 2009 Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com>
 - 1.16-2
 - Add fontconfig.prov and macros.fontconfig so that we can automatically


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- import.log	21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000	1.7
+++ import.log	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787
 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014
 fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931
+fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- sources	21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000	1.7
+++ sources	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-9d449121a0762b0e08cd1fdf99c10e92  fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2
+afcfbffe48379897aaaf7260ec2f931d  fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2


--- fontconfig.prov DELETED ---


--- macros.fontconfig DELETED ---



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 21:02:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:02:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 431355] oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to
 be changed
In-Reply-To: <bug-431355-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-431355-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902052102.n15L219k029485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355


Marcelo <mmtsales at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mmtsales at gmail.com




--- Comment #7 from Marcelo <mmtsales at gmail.com>  2009-02-05 16:01:58 EDT ---
I have a similar problem. In F10, after the last openoffice update to version
3.0.1-15.2, my ooocalc spreadsheets are taking more horizontal space than
before. It seems the horizontal spacing has changed. I can be mistaken, but I
think only the numbers are more spaced, I can't see any difference in the space
between letters. But I'm sure something has changed, because I have some
spreadsheets which were exactly as wide as my screen and now they don't fit
anymore. The font used is Arial.
I can see no noticeable difference in ooowriter documents.

Does this make sense? Is this possibly related to the bug reported by the OP?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb  5 23:27:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:27:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902052327.n15NRY5a030651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Fran?ois Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE




--- Comment #39 from Fran?ois Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-05 18:27:32 EDT ---

Thank you for the bug report. This particular bug was fixed and a update
package
was published for download. Please feel free to report any further bugs you
find.

You can obtain the updated package by typing 'yum update <package>' or using
the
graphical updater, Software Update.

Closing as original reporter confirms it is fixed for him.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 04:49:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 23:49:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484109] liberation-fonts update in reality erases all installed
 liberation fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484109-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484109-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060449.n164n95g002863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484109


Caius "kaio" Chance <caio at dejieshi.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
                 CC|                            |caio at dejieshi.com
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance <caio at dejieshi.com>  2009-02-05 23:49:08 EDT ---
Patch with reference of dejavu-fonts:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81636

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 05:07:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:07:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477451-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060507.n1657wRR005851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451


Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 05:07:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:07:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060507.n1657xqT005877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477451, which changed state.

Bug 477451 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 05:24:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:24:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060524.n165OWAR010000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-06 00:24:32 EDT ---
dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 05:23:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:23:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060523.n165N1nf009471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 05:22:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:22:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting
 font
In-Reply-To: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481501-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060522.n165Mw2L010429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-06 00:22:57 EDT ---
dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 06:28:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:28:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902060628.n166S6T3023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Caius "kaio" Chance <caio at dejieshi.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
                 CC|                            |caio at dejieshi.com
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb  6 08:33:26 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Fri,  6 Feb 2009 08:33:26 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090206083326.1711E1B804A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 12:46:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:46:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061246.n16CkSbg008301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-06 07:46:27 EDT ---
Thank you for review.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: vlgothic-fonts
Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts
Owners: tagoh
Branches: devel F-10 F-9
InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 13:51:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:51:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477406-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477406-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061351.n16DpDnd025102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406


Bug 477406 depends on bug 481484, which changed state.

Bug 481484 Summary: Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED

Bug 477406 depends on bug 481501, which changed state.

Bug 481501 Summary: Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED



--- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2009-02-06 08:51:11 EDT ---
We're now using the system copies of the dustin-*-fonts.

What's left to look into is SteveHand alias steve.ttf. There's now a system
sj-stevehand-fonts (thanks Sven!). Rex, can you please check how to get Blinken
to use the system copy?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 14:58:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:58:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061458.n16EwKmc008911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 16:08:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:08:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061608.n16G8Vr6025092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pbrobinson at gmail.com




--- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>  2009-02-06 11:08:28 EDT ---
What is the status of this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 16:09:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:09:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from
 Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-462711-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462711-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061609.n16G92Y0025796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711


Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pbrobinson at gmail.com




--- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>  2009-02-06 11:09:01 EDT ---
What is the status of this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 18:47:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:47:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061847.n16Il7hM028060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-06 13:47:05 EDT ---
I may be able to get to this next week.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb  6 19:58:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:58:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450774] CVE-2008-1808 FreeType off-by-one flaws
In-Reply-To: <bug-450774-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450774-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902061958.n16JwJIZ012584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450774


Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) <bressers at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |484441
         Depends on|                            |484442
         Depends on|                            |484443
         Depends on|                            |484444




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb  7 08:05:44 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Sat,  7 Feb 2009 08:05:44 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090207080544.494191F82E0@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 03:16:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:16:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484536] New: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs
Message-ID: <bug-484536-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536

           Summary: various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: smc-fonts
        AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Various fonts in the smc-fonts package, especially smc-fonts-meera, which is
installed on every Fedora machine because of being being "default" in compts,
have default glyphs shaped like an R in circle for some Malayalam characters.

For example, Meera has the following default glyphs in places that it should
not have: U+0D44, U+0D62, U+0D63, U+0D71, U+0D72, U+0D73, U+0D74, U+0D79,
U+0D7A, U+0D7B U+0D7C, U+0D7D, U+0D7E, U+0D7F

Also, there are several default glyphs in places that Unicode may use for
future encoding of Malayalam characters, like U+0D00 and U+0D29.

All those R in cirlces should be removed from the font, to make the font
Unicode-complying. Alternatively, Meera can be replaced by a standard font.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 08:01:07 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 08:01:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090208080107.ED0C91F82DD@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 09:04:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:04:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs
In-Reply-To: <bug-484536-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484536-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902080904.n1894MX0001577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536





--- Comment #1 from Santhosh Thottingal <santhosh.thottingal at gmail.com>  2009-02-08 04:04:21 EDT ---
The following code points were added to Unicode 5.1 by Unicode consortium
0D7A MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU NN(???)
0D7B MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU N(???)
0D7C MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU RR(???)
0D7D MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU L(???)
0D7E MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU LL(???)
0D7F MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU K(???)
Please note that these glyphs are already present in Malayalam(ml_IN) fonts and
mapped to
? +  ?  + zwj,
? + ? + zwj
? + ?  + zwj
? + ?  + zwj
? + ? + zwj
? + ? + zwj
respectively.
Large amount of data encoded using this standard(5.0) is present in digital
format. By duplicating the encoding by defining new code points for these
glyphs, Unicode brought dual encoding issue for
Malayalam. Dual encoding without canonical equivalence brings chaos to Unicode
Malayalam including security issues. And it makes existing application buggy
while handling Malayalam. So accepting these code
points to our application should be done with extreme care. We should keep
backward compatibility and at the same time we should avoid dual encoding.
There are two options:

a) Unicode consortium should define canonical equivalence between the existing
representation and newly defined duplicate code points
b) Unicode consortium should deprecate the new code points(this is recommended,
since the new code points does not bring any advantage other than issues to
existing data and application both in technical
and security aspects )

It is because of this reason , Swathanthra Malayalam Computing(SMC), the FOSS
developer community which develops/maintains these fonts decided to postpone
adding these glyphs to fonts(Not only to fonts,
but existing applications too) until Unicode resolve the above mentioned
issues. SMC had already informed Unicode about the problems by the document No:
L2/08-038. You can see a copy here
http://wiki.smc.org.in/images/2/23/SMC_Unicode_5.1.pdf. If this bug is a
serious concern for you, you may also contact Unicode consortium to resolve the
issue asap.

 Unicode 5.1 compliance means backward compatibility to 5.0 and older versions
also. If we want to keep backward compatibility we should keep the existing
glyph-code-point mapping. At the same time if we
duplicate those glyphs for another code point in the font, that is a serious
issue.

This bug should postponed till Unicode take any decision on this problem.

Regarding other new code points in Unicode 5.1 version,  we are planning to add
those glyphs to fonts in their next versions(No font in Malayalam has those
glyphs as of now). The R sign in the unassigned
code point positions will be removed as and when Unicode defines characters for
them in future.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 09:12:38 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 09:12:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.94, 1.95 import.log,
	1.11, 1.12
Message-ID: <20090208091239.4B30F700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2029/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
autoprovides


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -r1.94 -r1.95
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000	1.94
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Feb 2009 09:12:05 -0000	1.95
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.28
-Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData}
 
 BuildArch:     noarch
-BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13
+BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.17
 
 %description
 %common_desc
@@ -252,10 +252,12 @@
 %doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README
 %doc build/unicover.txt build/status.txt.bz2
 
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb  5  2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 2.28-4
+??? Test build with new fontpackages and in-rpm auto-font-provides
+
 * Fri Jan 16 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 2.28-3
 ??? Fix lgc-serif obsoletes


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- import.log	16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000	1.11
+++ import.log	8 Feb 2009 09:12:06 -0000	1.12
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229879833
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011
+dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Sun Feb  8 09:23:27 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 09:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 346419] Add Baseline table support (align scripts in a line of
	text)
In-Reply-To: <bug-346419-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>
Message-ID: <20090208092327.D47FF23F537@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419

  pango | general | Ver: unspecified




------- Comment #9 from Roozbeh Pournader  2009-02-08 09:23 UTC -------
This is from a private conversation with an Adobe font expert about baseline
support. He said that very few layout engines support the baseline feature, and
that the only existing application publicly available is that in Flash 10. Some
documentation here:

http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS3LCR/Flash_10.0/flash/text/engine/TextBaseline.html


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 09:34:48 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 09:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.1,
	1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090208093448.5CD5A700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5401/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
autoprovides


Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 06:55:56 -0000	1.1
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000	1.2
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081007
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb  8 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20081007-4 
+??? test new rpm font autoprovides
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-3
 ??? renamed to ???apanov-edrip-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	27 Jan 2009 06:55:57 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319
+apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 09:39:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:39:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902080939.n189dlhF009926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447


Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 09:39:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:39:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902080939.n189dm4u009952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state.

Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 09:38:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:38:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902080938.n189cBCj007892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 09:38:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:38:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902080938.n189cCMR007917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state.

Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From kevin at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 21:58:14 2009
From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel - New directory
Message-ID: <20090208215814.5E7AB700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel

Log Message:
Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel added to the repository




From kevin at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 21:58:14 2009
From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 21:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts - New directory
Message-ID: <20090208215814.208AB700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts

Log Message:
Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts added to the repository




From kevin at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 21:58:28 2009
From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1
Message-ID: <20090208215828.8B996700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts

Added Files:
	Makefile 
Log Message:
Setup of module vlgothic-fonts


--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Top level Makefile for module vlgothic-fonts
all : CVS/Root common-update
	@cvs update

common-update : common
	@cd common && cvs update

common : CVS/Root
	@cvs checkout common

CVS/Root :
	@echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1

clean :
	@find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \;



From kevin at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb  8 21:58:28 2009
From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi)
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE,
	1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1
Message-ID: <20090208215828.D2B92700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/kevin/CVSROOT/admin/tmpcvsD30918/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel

Added Files:
	.cvsignore Makefile sources 
Log Message:
Setup of module vlgothic-fonts


--- NEW FILE .cvsignore ---


--- NEW FILE Makefile ---
# Makefile for source rpm: vlgothic-fonts
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2009/02/08 21:58:28 kevin Exp $
NAME := vlgothic-fonts
SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec))

define find-makefile-common
for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done
endef

MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common))

ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),)
# attept a checkout
define checkout-makefile-common
test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2
endef

MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common))
endif

include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON)


--- NEW FILE sources ---



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb  8 21:58:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902082158.n18LwE12032149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-08 16:58:13 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 05:10:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:10:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902090510.n195AlER012063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
          Component|comps                       |wqy-zenhei-fonts
         AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com         |fangqq at gmail.com
            Summary|make wqy-zenhei-fonts       |allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to
                   |default in @chinese-support |be installed by default in
                   |group                       |@chinese-support group
          QAContact|katzj at redhat.com            |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org




--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 00:10:46 EDT ---
Can we soften the font config so that wqy-zenhei-fonts can be installed by
default by Chinese without taking over the whole desktop? :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 05:29:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:29:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902090529.n195Tv4o017198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459


Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) |




--- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-09 00:29:56 EDT ---
hi Jens

I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not
overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more?

As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to
"serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled
glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu,
uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for
zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 05:34:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:34:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480470-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480470-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902090534.n195YsaN018021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470





--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 00:34:53 EDT ---
This is almost done thanks to kind people have been updating publican.spec for
the fonts changes so far.

I will update for sazanami-fonts now, which just leaves us waiting for the
lohit-fonts subpackage rename.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 06:38:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:38:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902090638.n196c07K029443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 01:37:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I am not entirely sure if I understood "setting as default" and "not
> overriding", maybe you can explain it a little bit more?

I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default.

Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop
fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts

> As you know, Uming is a Song/Mincho style font, therefore, it is close to
> "serif" alias, and wqy-zenhei is a Hei/Gothic font with sans-serif styled
> glyphs for both proportional and monospaced faces (in a single ttc). On Ubuntu,
> uming is used as the default serif and wqy-zenhei as the default sans-serif for
> zh locales. is this what you intend to achieve?

Eventually maybe. :)  What about Ukai?

Last I tested wqy-zenhei was still too aggressive in priority to coexist with
cjkuni-fonts.

Thanks for the information about ubuntu's defaults.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 07:04:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:04:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484536] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs
In-Reply-To: <bug-484536-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484536-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902090704.n19749sl031456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536


Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n




--- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 02:04:09 EDT ---
santhosh,
thanks for update

chill characters are from 7A to 7F so if we are not supporting those characters
we can simply keep blank at those position
but adding shape ? which has different unicode value U+24c7 in those places
make this font Unicode incompatible

u+ 0d44
u+ 0d62
u+ 0d63
U+ 0d70 -  wrong shape
U+ 0d71
U+ 0d72
U+ 0d73
U+ 0d74
U+ 0d75

also above are some more places where unicode has given shapes then also meera
has ? sign there
this is wrong
and it makes it unicode incompatible (some out of these are added in Unicode
5.1 in that case only blank is require)

IMHO we do not need to put R shapes in Reserved spaces as those code point are
already not implemented in any application (pango, qt), typing is also not
allowed for those characters and adding those shapes in font increasing its
size unnecessarily

i think there is no harm in removing those shapes from font

It will be very good if we can say Meera font is Unicode 5.0 compatible :)

Roozbeh
Thanks for notifying these thing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb  9 08:00:50 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2009 08:00:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090209080050.C2D721F82EB@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 14:16:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:16:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902091416.n19EGX1n028178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #59 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2009-02-09 09:16:29 EDT ---
How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 14:29:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:29:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484613] crash with "double free or corruption (out)" in pango
In-Reply-To: <bug-484613-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484613-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902091429.n19ETSWm031237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484613


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |besfahbo at redhat.com,
                   |                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com
          Component|firefox                     |pango
         AssignedTo|gecko-bugs-nobody at fedorapro |besfahbo at redhat.com
                   |ject.org                    |




--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 09:29:27 EDT ---
I don?t see anything like Firefox crash. Reassigning to pango component for
further investigation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 14:37:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:37:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902091437.n19EbF0O031948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #60 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 09:37:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> How to get update to rawhide from Fedora Alpha KDE Live CD?

Enable rawhide repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 15:44:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:44:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902091544.n19FiRPS014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #5 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-09 10:44:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 
> I wrote "install as default", ie meaning install the package by default.
> 
> Overriding means that installation should not override other default desktop
> fonts, like dejavu-fonts and cjkuni-fonts

ok, that's fine (zenhei had never overrode dejavu), I will change the settings
when I update the fontconfig file to follow the new guideline (I am still not
able to compile due to %{_fontdir} definition #478891). However, I would like
to remind that this basically means Uming will "override" sans-serif and
monospace and all Chinese will be displayed as bitmaps. Also there is no way to
use Dejavu and zenhei together anymore.

> 
> Eventually maybe. :)  What about Ukai?
> 

this is up to you and the Chinese i18n. I rarely see people use Ukai as desktop
fonts despite that fontconfig default settings giving it high priority, as it
is designed mostly for printing, and it look very blurry on screen.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 17:03:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:03:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902091703.n19H3gXi001658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-09 12:03:40 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=331334)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331334)
New spec

Nicholas, how does this look?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 22:18:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:18:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092218.n19MIU5o011938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635


rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rex.camposagrado at ascenderco
                   |                            |rp.com




--- Comment #10 from rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com  2009-02-09 17:18:29 EDT ---
Ascender just released OpenType Pro versions of the Droid fonts here:
http://www.droidfonts.co?m . This might be interesting to creative
professionals who would like to use the Droid fonts in their design projects.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 23:21:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NLI4h032032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 18:21:17 EDT ---
Okay I think if you restrict wqy-zenhei-fonts to just zh, which has similarly
been done to fedora cjkuni-fonts and baekmuk-ttf-fonts recently with font conf
directives to restrict to one language (to avoid unihan issues, etc) then we
can start to think about this seriously.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 23:21:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:21:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092321.n19NL9mK012444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 23:24:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:24:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092324.n19NOAeL013037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-09 18:24:09 EDT ---
Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in
fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 23:37:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:37:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092337.n19NblSM015868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-09 18:37:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Though better in the long term would be to get the font included in
> fontconfig's /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf file like dejavu, cjkuni, etc.

Certainly. I heard the fontconfig developers were re-working on the default
font priorities last year, but then, nothing has happened.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb  9 23:55:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:55:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902092355.n19NtKfi019716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #329052|application/octet-stream    |text/plain
          mime type|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From fangq at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 05:38:10 2009
From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19
Message-ID: <20090210053810.9695570121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: fangq

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4532

Modified Files:
	wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
use fontpackages macros


Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	11 May 2008 18:45:23 -0000	1.18
+++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:37:40 -0000	1.19
@@ -1,25 +1,22 @@
-%define fontconfdir     %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
-%define wqyroot         wqy-bitmapfont-gb18030
-%define wqyfontdir      %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi
-%define fontdir         %{wqyfontdir}/bitmap
-%define catalogue       %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d
-
-Name: wqy-bitmap-fonts
-Summary: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts
-Version: 0.9.9
-Release: 6%{?dist}
-# for font embedding exception please see
-# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException
-License: GPLv2 with exceptions
-URL: http://wqy.sourceforge.net/en/
-Group: User Interface/X
-Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-gb18030-%{version}-0.tar.gz
-Source1: 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: bdftopcf, mkfontdir
-Requires: fontconfig >= 2.3
-#Patch0: %{name}-%{version}-fix-mono.patch
+%define fontname  wqy-bitmap
+%define fontconf  61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf
+%define wqyroot   wqy-bitmapfont-gb18030
+
+Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
+Version:        0.9.9
+Release:        7%{?dist}
+Summary:        WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts
+
+Group:          User Interface/X
+License:        GPLv2 with exceptions
+URL:            http://wenq.org/enindex.cgi
+Source0:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-gb18030-%{version}-0.tar.gz
+Source1: 	61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf
+BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+
+BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description
 The Wen Quan Yi bitmap font is a manually fine-tuned
@@ -39,54 +36,42 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n %{wqyroot}
-#%patch0 -p0
+
 
 %build
 make wqyv1
 
+
 %install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{wqyfontdir}
-install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
-install -p -m644 *pt.pcf  %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/
-install -p -m644 fonts.alias  %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/
-install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}
-install -p -m644 %{SOURCE1}  %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/
-touch %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.dir
-
-# Install catalogue symlink
-mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}
-ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.pcf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
+
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
+        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
+
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
+      %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
 
-%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
 
 %clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+
+%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.pcf
 
-%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README LOGO.png
-%dir %{wqyfontdir}
-%dir %{fontdir}
-%{fontdir}/*pt.pcf
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf
-%{fontdir}/fonts.alias
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir
-%{catalogue}/%{name}
-
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
-fi
-
-%postun
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
-  if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
-  fi
-fi
+%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
+*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 0.9.9-7
+- use fontpackages macros
+
 *Tue May 11 2008 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 0.9.9-6
 - remove bold font files, as Xft can do fake-emboldening byitself
 



From fangq at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 05:46:46 2009
From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:46:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.19,1.20
Message-ID: <20090210054647.1B75A70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: fangq

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5815

Modified Files:
	wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
use fontpackages macros


Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20
--- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:37:40 -0000	1.19
+++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:46:15 -0000	1.20
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
 BuildArch:      noarch
-BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel, bdftopcf
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description



From fangq at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 05:50:18 2009
From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:50:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.20,1.21
Message-ID: <20090210055018.8DDAD70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: fangq

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6488

Modified Files:
	wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
add bdftopcf as dependency


Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:46:15 -0000	1.20
+++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:49:48 -0000	1.21
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.9.9
-Release:        7%{?dist}
+Release:        8%{?dist}
 Summary:        WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 0.9.9-8
+- add bdftopcf to BuildRequires
+
 *Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 0.9.9-7
 - use fontpackages macros
 



From fangq at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 07:00:49 2009
From: fangq at fedoraproject.org (Qianqian Fang)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:00:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090210070049.371367012C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: fangq

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17006

Modified Files:
	wqy-unibit-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
use fontpackages macros


Index: wqy-unibit-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- wqy-unibit-fonts.spec	4 Oct 2007 01:45:36 -0000	1.1
+++ wqy-unibit-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 07:00:18 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
-%define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi-unibit
-%define catalogue       %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d
+%define fontname wqy-unibit
 
-Name: wqy-unibit-fonts
-Summary: WenQuanYi Unibit Bitmap Font
-Version: 1.1.0
-Release: 4%{?dist}
-# for font embedding exception please see
-# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException
-License: GPLv2 with exceptions
-URL: http://wqy.sourceforge.net/en/
-Group: User Interface/X
-Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-unibit-bdf-%{version}-1.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: bdftopcf, mkfontdir
+Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
+Version:        1.1.0
+Release:        5%{?dist}
+Summary:        WenQuanYi Unibit Bitmap Font
+
+Group:          User Interface/X
+License:        GPLv2 with exceptions
+URL:            http://wenq.org/enindex.cgi
+Source0:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/wqy/wqy-unibit-bdf-%{version}-1.tar.gz
+BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+
+BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel, bdftopcf
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description
 The Wen Quan Yi Unibit is designed as a dual-width (16x16,16x8) 
@@ -34,46 +34,36 @@
 http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?Unicode_Chart_EN
 
 %prep
-%setup -q -n wqy-unibit
+%setup -q -n %{fontname}
+
 
 %build
 make
 
 %install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-install -d -m755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
-install -p -m644 *.pcf  %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/
-
-# Install catalogue symlink
-mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{catalogue}
-ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.pcf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
 
-%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir}
 
 %clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+
+%_font_pkg *.pcf
 
-%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README
-%dir %{fontdir}
-%{fontdir}/*.pcf
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir
-%{catalogue}/%{name}
-
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
-fi
-
-%postun
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
-  if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
-  fi
-fi
+%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
+*Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 1.1.0-5
+- use fontpackages macro
+
 *Sun Sep 30 2007 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 1.1.0-4
 - more spec file clean up
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 07:49:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:49:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902100749.n1A7nM01013273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #61 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2009-02-10 02:49:21 EDT ---
Could you test it in KDE? Things do not work out for me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 07:53:50 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090210075350.2D8D21F82EA@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Feb 10 08:53:47 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:53:47 -0800
Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at
 high dpis (resolutions)
In-Reply-To: <bug-378927-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-378927-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200902100853.n1A8rlLB006466@mrapp52.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927


Bug 378927 depends on bug 469933, which changed state.

Bug 469933 Summary: Default window size is much bigger than its content if the display resolution is high
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469933

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 10:24:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:24:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming
 fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101024.n1AAOLWx000302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #62 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-10 05:24:19 EDT ---
Could you tell me what is your testing env and procedures please?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 11:48:52 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel import.log, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090210114852.3FC4D70121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9696/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf 
	vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Initial import



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1_fc10:HEAD:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1.fc10.src.rpm:1234266408


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>
    
    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>monospace</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>monospace</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL Gothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL Gothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>monospace</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>sans-serif</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>sans-serif</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL PGothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL PGothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>sans-serif</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec ---
%define priority	66
%define fontname	vlgothic
%define	archivename	VLGothic-%{version}
%define	fontconf	%{priority}-%{fontname}
%define	catalogue	%{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d
%define	common_desc	\
VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\
Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\
but some have also been improved by the project.

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20090204
Release:	1%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese TrueType font

License:	mplus and BSD
Group:		User Interface/X
URL:		http://dicey.org/vlgothic
Source0:	http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
Source1:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf
Source2:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel

Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description
%common_desc

This package provides the monospace VLGothic font.

%package	common
Summary:	Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description	common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
Summary:	Proportional Japanese TrueType font
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
%common_desc

This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some
non-Japanese characters.

%prep
%setup -q -n VLGothic


%build
%{nil}


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d	$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
	 		$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf

for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done


%clean
rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}


%files common
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc README* LICENSE*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf

%_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf


%changelog
* Wed Feb  4 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-1
- New upstream release.
- Update spec file for new packaging policy.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts.
  - Added vlgothic-fonts-common.

* Fri Dec  5 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-2
- update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Thu Dec  4 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-1
- update to 20081203 release.
- clean up spec file.
- changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081029-1
- update to 20081029 release.

* Tue Sep  9 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20080908-1
- update to 20080908 release.

* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080624-1.fc10
- update to 20080624 release

* Wed May  7 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080429-1
- update to 20080429 release
- rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf

* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20071215-2.fc9
- move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage
- rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage
- use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage
- add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config
- drop the docs subpackage
- use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros
- improve summaries and descriptions
- do not require fontconfig
- drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides

* Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071215-1
- Update to 20071215

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-2
- Rename the font directory.
- Fix font selection problem in Flash 9.
- Make it remove the old configuration files on updating.

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-1
- Update to 20071015
- Make it separated into subpackages

* Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070901-1
- Update to 20070901

* Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070507-1
- Update to 20070507

* Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070328-1
- Update to 20070328

* Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070101-1
- Update to 20070101

* Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-5
- Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts.
- Now config files are replaced by every updating.

* Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-4
- Fix the mistyped dist tag.

* Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-3
- Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-2
- Modify the specfile.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-1
- Preparing for Fedora Extras.

* Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061021-2
- Update to 20061021.

* Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060913-2
- Update to 20060913.

* Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060831-1
- Initial packaging.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02  VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 11:53:49 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel vlgothic-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090210115349.5E05370121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10757

Modified Files:
	vlgothic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-2
- clean up.


Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- vlgothic-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0000	1.1
+++ vlgothic-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 11:53:19 -0000	1.2
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 %define fontname	vlgothic
 %define	archivename	VLGothic-%{version}
 %define	fontconf	%{priority}-%{fontname}
-%define	catalogue	%{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d
 %define	common_desc	\
 VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\
 Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\
@@ -10,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	20090204
-Release:	1%{?dist}
+Release:	2%{?dist}
 Summary:	Japanese TrueType font
 
 License:	mplus and BSD
@@ -94,6 +93,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-2
+- clean up.
+
 * Wed Feb  4 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-1
 - New upstream release.
 - Update spec file for new packaging policy.



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 12:02:37 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090210120237.6926370121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12200/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf 
	vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Initial import


--- NEW FILE import.log ---
vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2_fc11:F-10:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234267291


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>
    
    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>monospace</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>monospace</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL Gothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL Gothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>monospace</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>sans-serif</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>sans-serif</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL PGothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL PGothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>sans-serif</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec ---
%define priority	66
%define fontname	vlgothic
%define	archivename	VLGothic-%{version}
%define	fontconf	%{priority}-%{fontname}
%define	common_desc	\
VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\
Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\
but some have also been improved by the project.

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20090204
Release:	2%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese TrueType font

License:	mplus and BSD
Group:		User Interface/X
URL:		http://dicey.org/vlgothic
Source0:	http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
Source1:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf
Source2:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel

Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description
%common_desc

This package provides the monospace VLGothic font.

%package	common
Summary:	Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description	common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
Summary:	Proportional Japanese TrueType font
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
%common_desc

This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some
non-Japanese characters.

%prep
%setup -q -n VLGothic


%build
%{nil}


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d	$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
	 		$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf

for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done


%clean
rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}


%files common
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc README* LICENSE*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf

%_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-2
- clean up.

* Wed Feb  4 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-1
- New upstream release.
- Update spec file for new packaging policy.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts.
  - Added vlgothic-fonts-common.

* Fri Dec  5 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-2
- update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Thu Dec  4 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-1
- update to 20081203 release.
- clean up spec file.
- changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081029-1
- update to 20081029 release.

* Tue Sep  9 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20080908-1
- update to 20080908 release.

* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080624-1.fc10
- update to 20080624 release

* Wed May  7 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080429-1
- update to 20080429 release
- rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf

* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20071215-2.fc9
- move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage
- rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage
- use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage
- add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config
- drop the docs subpackage
- use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros
- improve summaries and descriptions
- do not require fontconfig
- drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides

* Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071215-1
- Update to 20071215

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-2
- Rename the font directory.
- Fix font selection problem in Flash 9.
- Make it remove the old configuration files on updating.

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-1
- Update to 20071015
- Make it separated into subpackages

* Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070901-1
- Update to 20070901

* Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070507-1
- Update to 20070507

* Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070328-1
- Update to 20070328

* Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070101-1
- Update to 20070101

* Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-5
- Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts.
- Now config files are replaced by every updating.

* Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-4
- Fix the mistyped dist tag.

* Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-3
- Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-2
- Modify the specfile.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-1
- Preparing for Fedora Extras.

* Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061021-2
- Update to 20061021.

* Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060913-2
- Update to 20060913.

* Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060831-1
- Initial packaging.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	10 Feb 2009 12:02:07 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02  VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 10 12:05:51 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf, NONE,
	1.1 vlgothic-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090210120551.6E79170121@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12984/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	import.log vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf 
	vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf vlgothic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Initial import


--- NEW FILE import.log ---
vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2_fc11:F-9:vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234267503


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-gothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>
    
    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>monospace</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL Gothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>monospace</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL Gothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL Gothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>monospace</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fontconfig-pgothic.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
        <test name="family">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <match>
        <test name="lang">
            <string>ja-jp</string>
        </test>
        <test name="family">
            <string>sans-serif</string>
        </test>
        <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
            <string>VL PGothic</string>
        </edit>
    </match>

    <alias>
        <family>sans-serif</family>
        <prefer>
            <family>VL PGothic</family>
        </prefer>
    </alias>

    <alias>
        <family>VL PGothic</family>
        <default>
            <family>sans-serif</family>
        </default>
    </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE vlgothic-fonts.spec ---
%define priority	66
%define fontname	vlgothic
%define	archivename	VLGothic-%{version}
%define	fontconf	%{priority}-%{fontname}
%define	common_desc	\
VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project.\
Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts,\
but some have also been improved by the project.

Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Version:	20090204
Release:	2%{?dist}
Summary:	Japanese TrueType font

License:	mplus and BSD
Group:		User Interface/X
URL:		http://dicey.org/vlgothic
Source0:	http://vinelinux.org/~daisuke/vlgothic/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
Source1:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-pgothic.conf
Source2:	%{fontname}-fontconfig-gothic.conf
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch:	noarch
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel

Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
%description
%common_desc

This package provides the monospace VLGothic font.

%package	common
Summary:	Common files for VLGothic Japanese TrueType fonts
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description	common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.

%package -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
Summary:	Proportional Japanese TrueType font
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20090204-1
Provides:	VLGothic-fonts-proportional = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-p-fonts
%common_desc

This package provides the VLGothic font with proportional glyphs for some
non-Japanese characters.

%prep
%setup -q -n VLGothic


%build
%{nil}


%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d	$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
	 		$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}

install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pgothic.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-gothic.conf

for fconf in %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf %{fontconf}-gothic.conf; do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done


%clean
rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}


%files common
%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755)
%doc README* LICENSE*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-gothic.conf VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf

%_font_pkg -n p -f %{fontconf}-pgothic.conf VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf


%changelog
* Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-2
- clean up.

* Wed Feb  4 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-1
- New upstream release.
- Update spec file for new packaging policy.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts to vlgothic-fonts.
  - Renamed VLGothic-fonts-proportional to vlgothic-p-fonts.
  - Added vlgothic-fonts-common.

* Fri Dec  5 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-2
- update fontconfig config according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Thu Dec  4 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081203-1
- update to 20081203 release.
- clean up spec file.
- changed the priority prefix for fontconfig to 66 according to Fontconfig packaging tips.

* Wed Oct 29 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081029-1
- update to 20081029 release.

* Tue Sep  9 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20080908-1
- update to 20080908 release.

* Thu Jul 31 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080624-1.fc10
- update to 20080624 release

* Wed May  7 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20080429-1
- update to 20080429 release
- rename 59-VLGothic-sans.conf to 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf

* Thu Jan 17 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 20071215-2.fc9
- move monospace font to main package and obsolete monospace subpackage
- rename sans subpackage to proportional and obsolete sans subpackage
- use a separate font dir for the proportional font subpackage
- add fc-cache scriptlets and drop superfluous removal of old font config
- drop the docs subpackage
- use fontname, fontdir, and fontconfdir macros
- improve summaries and descriptions
- do not require fontconfig
- drop VLGothic obsoletes and provides

* Sat Jan 12 2008 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071215-1
- Update to 20071215

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-2
- Rename the font directory.
- Fix font selection problem in Flash 9.
- Make it remove the old configuration files on updating.

* Thu Oct 18 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20071015-1
- Update to 20071015
- Make it separated into subpackages

* Sat Sep 09 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070901-1
- Update to 20070901

* Sat Jun 02 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070507-1
- Update to 20070507

* Sun Apr 22 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070328-1
- Update to 20070328

* Wed Jan 03 2007 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20070101-1
- Update to 20070101

* Sun Dec 10 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-5
- Decrease the priority of the VLGothic fonts lower than DejaVu fonts.
- Now config files are replaced by every updating.

* Wed Nov 29 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-4
- Fix the mistyped dist tag.

* Sat Nov 18 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-3
- Modify the specfile along with the Fedora Extras packaging policy.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-2
- Modify the specfile.

* Sun Nov 12 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061026-1
- Preparing for Fedora Extras.

* Sat Oct 28 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20061021-2
- Update to 20061021.

* Tue Sep 19 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060913-2
- Update to 20060913.

* Thu Aug 31 2006 Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> - 20060831-1
- Initial packaging.


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	8 Feb 2009 21:58:28 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	10 Feb 2009 12:05:21 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+54298db27daf7b3ec92aff5cfab72f02  VLGothic-20090204.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 12:11:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:11:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101211.n1ACBFUc024308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-10 07:11:14 EDT ---
Thanks. packages has been built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 12:12:55 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:12:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101212.n1ACCttQ024604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477479, which changed state.

Bug 477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 12:12:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:12:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477479-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101212.n1ACCsfb024572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-10 07:12:53 EDT ---
new package has been approved and available on devel, F-10 and F-9 now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 16:05:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:05:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101605.n1AG5RAs018476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-10 11:05:25 EDT ---
It is worth noting that the "Pro" fonts are not under a Free License.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 16:47:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:47:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101647.n1AGlVDP005885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #12 from rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com  2009-02-10 11:47:30 EDT ---
While the necessity for Ascender to offer the Droid Pro fonts under a free
license may not be extremely well received by the open-source community, please
be aware that while we partner with several open-source providers and are happy
to build fonts for these partners, no business model exists for font vendors if
we were to release our IP directly under an open license.

For the record, Our http://www.DroidFonts.com site does not offer any fonts
under any free license.

We have taken the Droid fonts under Apache v2 and have enhanced the Droid fonts
as allowed under Apache v2. We are now offering the enhanced Droid Pro fonts
under a proprietary EULA for a license fee, with proper credit being given to
the underlying Apache covered portion of the fonts which we are licensing.

We built the Droid Pro fonts because the professional graphic design and
creative market was asking for them (in part to support the Android effort),
but these users require enhanced character ranges and sometimes want OTF format
fonts. There are also OEMs which require additional language support and
additional weights and styles of Droid.

>From our perspective, this is a win-win situation. The open community has
another outstanding set of fonts (to add to the Liberation fonts we built for
Red Hat) and we have the opportunity to satisfy demands for additional Droid
support. We see this as very much like the business models of the Linux OS
providers, who often supply a good base OS for free and then are able to stay
in business by providing enhancements and support.

I hope this helps to explain what we're up to.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 17:02:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:02:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101702.n1AH2G3V031253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-10 12:02:15 EDT ---
No, I understand what you're doing. I may disagree with your motivations (I do
work for a company whose entire model is based around FOSS licensing), but I
understand them.

My post was intended to clarify to anyone who might come across your post and
start to package the Pro fonts for submission in Fedora, as I would have to
immediately block such an action on licensing grounds.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 17:20:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:20:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
In-Reply-To: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472635-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101720.n1AHKjFQ002869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635





--- Comment #14 from Rex Camposagrado <rex.camposagrado at ascendercorp.com>  2009-02-10 12:20:44 EDT ---
Correction to my previous Comment #12: While the necessity for Ascender to
(not) offer the Droid Pro fonts under a free license may not be extremely well
received by the open-source community,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Feb 10 19:36:02 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:36:02 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200902101936.n1AJa2Xn016584@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Tim Riley [:timr] <timr at mozilla.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timr at mozilla.com




--- Comment #172 from Tim Riley [:timr] <timr at mozilla.com>  2009-02-10 11:34:15 PST ---
helpwanted, qawanted were added way back in 2004-05-03 without a comment.  Are
these still needed?  What help or QA support is wanted?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 10 19:34:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:34:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902101934.n1AJYoQH010029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #9 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-10 14:34:49 EDT ---
here I have a problem: in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf, I used alias sections to set the
preferences, I remember this is the recommended way of setting the priorities,
however, if I want to use lang tags, I may have to write this whole section
using match and prepend, or kill the whole section. 

Jens, is this what you want to do?

----------------------------------------------------

        <alias>
                <family>serif</family>
                <prefer>
                        <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family>
                        <family>DejaVu Serif</family>
                        <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei</family>
                </prefer>
        </alias>
        <alias>
                <family>sans-serif</family>
                <prefer>
                        <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family>
                        <family>DejaVu Sans</family>
                        <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei</family>
                </prefer>
        </alias>
        <alias>
                <family>monospace</family>
                <prefer>
                        <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family>
                        <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family>
                        <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono</family>
                </prefer>
        </alias>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Tue Feb 10 19:48:21 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:48:21 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200902101948.n1AJmLvs023294@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron at dbaron.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|helpwanted, qawanted        |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org  Wed Feb 11 02:13:09 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org))
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t
In-Reply-To: <bug-347237-214212@http.bugzilla.gnome.org/>
Message-ID: <20090211021309.EEE8C23EF75@label.gnome.org>

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237

  pango | general | Ver: unspecified

Bug flys changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mozbugbox at yahoo.com.au




-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 11 07:49:05 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:49:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090211074905.F16821F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 09:30:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:30:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902110930.n1B9U36W029983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458





--- Comment #10 from Rajeesh <rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com>  2009-02-11 04:30:02 EDT ---
Hi Nicolas,

Can we close this bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 11:30:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:30:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485050] New: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages
Message-ID: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050

           Summary: Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: pango
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Description of problem:
There are few characters added to Indic codespace in Unicode 5.1. They are
currently not handled according to their properties/script mechanism. Thus
there needs support for these characters to be added to pango for proper
rendering. List of these characters can be found here:
http://rahulpmb.blogspot.com/2008/04/unicode-5.html


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 11:35:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:35:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages
In-Reply-To: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111135.n1BBZAWp029412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |479207




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 11:32:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:32:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages
In-Reply-To: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111132.n1BBWNCc003899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050





--- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-11 06:32:22 EDT ---
Bug filed upstream :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571291

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 11:40:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:40:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages
In-Reply-To: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485050-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111140.n1BBelWH030730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n
                 CC|                            |rbhalera at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 13:43:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:43:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111343.n1BDhFLs026982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477412, which changed state.

Bug 477412 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 13:43:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:43:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477412] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477412-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477412-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111343.n1BDhEUe026957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412


Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan at gmail.com>  2009-02-11 08:43:12 EDT ---
The font is (unnecessarily) bundled with Latex sources auto-generated from
Doxygen; the sources can be used without the font file, but even then, are less
useful than the pre-generated HTML documentation, as they do not provide
symlinks.

I'm thus removing the entire latex subdirectory -- building for Rawhide now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 16:08:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:08:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111608.n1BG8Mqn013018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709


Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dwayne at translate.org.za




--- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-11 11:08:18 EDT ---
Bad news from me.  I had this problem, removed all the X11 fonts and things
worked.  A then added a number of cool fonts and bang its broken again with
this error:

Help! Server claimed font
 -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1
 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.

I ran fc-cache against each directory separately but this changed nothing.  How
the H^ll do I know which font is breaking this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 16:26:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:26:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111626.n1BGQCTc008844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709





--- Comment #19 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-11 11:26:10 EDT ---
Just remember I did a 'yum groupupdate Fonts' to make sure my default fonts
included all standard installs.  Things broke at some stage after that.

But I've tracked this down, if I do:

yum remove cjkunifonts-uming

fontforge now works

yum groupupdate Fonts

This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break.  So the default fonts
installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically
cjkunifonts-uming.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 18:15:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477397-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477397-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111815.n1BIFJiu014693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397


Adam Goode <adam at spicenitz.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #20 from Adam Goode <adam at spicenitz.org>  2009-02-11 13:15:18 EDT ---
1.8.27-9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 18:15:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:15:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902111815.n1BIFKCP014719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477397, which changed state.

Bug 477397 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 21:45:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:45:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902112145.n1BLjJA3029635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |palango at gmx.de
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-11 16:45:18 EDT ---
1. This bit is not strictly necessary
# Repeat for every font family -- Sans Mono

2. This one isn't either now that multiple ownership of font dirs was approved;
%_font_pkg will now auto-own this dir
%dir %{_fontdir}

3. having upstream publish an official sfd version and build from it would be
preferred (not a blocker)

4. You need to add a
Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} to the main package or
it won't pull common in (and it's necessary for fontconfig-filesystem)

The last one is the only real problem and it's a minor one

??? APPROVED ???

Please do not forget to fix those little problems, and continue from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 11 23:41:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:41:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902112341.n1BNfG4q011269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail
                   |                            |.com)




--- Comment #20 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-11 18:41:13 EDT ---
I have to ask ?wrong question? ? are you able to reproduce it with Fedora 10?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 00:12:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:12:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120012.n1C0CnaU016845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #10 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-11 19:12:48 EDT ---
ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this
means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or
browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up
their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get
updated.

Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 03:49:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:49:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical
 Staves
In-Reply-To: <bug-445261-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445261-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120349.n1C3ngEU023605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #12 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-11 22:49:41 EDT ---
This has been in for a long time, closing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 03:51:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:51:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts  - An OpenType font
 with a MATH table
In-Reply-To: <bug-455153-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-455153-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120351.n1C3pDK1000727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #10 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-11 22:51:09 EDT ---
This has been in for a long time, closing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 05:33:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:33:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120533.n1C5XSxC009335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459


Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #11 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-12 00:33:28 EDT ---
new package was built in rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 05:32:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120532.n1C5WAfK018634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891


Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #6 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-12 00:32:09 EDT ---
new package was built in rawhide.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 05:32:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120532.n1C5WCgi018709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 478891, which changed state.

Bug 478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 05:46:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:46:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120546.n1C5kKKC011492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891





--- Comment #8 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-12 00:46:20 EDT ---
sorry, the above comment meant to posted at Bug#476459.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 05:44:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:44:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902120544.n1C5i4kh020585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891





--- Comment #7 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-12 00:44:03 EDT ---
Also, as I mentioned before, I set up a sub-project to complete Google's Droid
Sans Fallback. In the past 3 months, we used our web-based application (demo
http://wenq.org/demo/fontopia_droid_tutorial.htm) and completed all 4300+
missing Han glyphs in CJK basic (U4E00-U9FC3). In the past month, we have been
doing the final review and are about to release a new font soon (named
"WenQuanYi Micro Hei"). Micro hei is only 4M in size with high quality glyphs.
I strongly recommend shipping this font with F11 (possibly default install for
Chinese support).

The latest nightly-build of the font can be found at 
http://wenq.org/daily/microhei/wqy-microhei-0.2-nightlybuild.tar.gz

I will submit a new package request soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Thu Feb 12 05:50:08 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:50:08 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200902120550.n1C5o8lj001862@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Brad Lassey (:blassey) <bugmail at lassey.us> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |478163




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 12 08:01:58 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090212080158.40D001F824A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 14:47:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:47:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477435-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477435-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902121447.n1CElbvb004990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435


Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 14:47:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:47:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902121447.n1CElceC005021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state.

Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 15:18:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:18:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902121518.n1CFIF9Z011823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #2 from Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de>  2009-02-12 10:18:15 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts
Short Description: A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font
Owners: palango
Branches: devel only
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 12 18:47:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:47:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902121847.n1CIlCdr026904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com




--- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-12 13:47:11 EDT ---
If we cannot determine the license of a file, we cannot include it. Please
remove the avatar font from all branches and push updates.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 05:22:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:22:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902130522.n1D5Mlod008623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-13 00:22:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> ok, I just killed the alias sections in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf. Basically, this
> means users have to manually select this font to use in their desktop or
> browsers; if they want to use dejavu and zenhei together, they have to code up
> their conf file, or wish one day the ancient font orders in 65-nonlatin get
> updated.

You could still include the old config file in avail.d/.

> Jens, let me know if this is good, thanks

I tried wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.8.34-2.20081027cvs.fc11 and it still behaves the
same way for me on a Japanese desktop, overriding the default Japanese font.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 06:36:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:36:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902130636.n1D6a4VK001005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-13 01:36:03 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 13 07:50:55 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090213075055.96D7D1F824A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 09:06:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:06:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902130906.n1D96w9U031261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709





--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-13 04:06:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> yum remove cjkunifonts-uming
> fontforge now works
> yum groupupdate Fonts
> This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break.  So the default fonts
> installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically
> cjkunifonts-uming.

Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or
cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From rbhalera at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 13 12:08:28 2009
From: rbhalera at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Bhalerao)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:08:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/lohit-fonts/devel lohit-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10
Message-ID: <20090213120828.B4C3570123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: rbhalera

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11092

Modified Files:
	lohit-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Updated according to new font packaging guidelines


Index: lohit-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- lohit-fonts.spec	9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -0000	1.9
+++ lohit-fonts.spec	13 Feb 2009 12:07:58 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,97 +1,271 @@
-%define xfontdir        %{_datadir}/fonts
-%define langlist        "bengali hindi gujarati tamil punjabi kannada malayalam oriya telugu marathi maithili kashmiri konkani nepali sindhi"
+%define fontname lohit
 
-Name:        lohit-fonts
-Version:     2.3.1
-Release:     1%{?dist}
-Summary:     Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
-
-Group:       User Interface/X
-License:     GPLv2
-URL:         http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Lohit
-Source:      http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildArch:   noarch
-BuildRoot:   %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-
-%description 
-This package provides Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, Punjabi, Tamil,
-Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya, Telugu, Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, 
-Konkani, Nepali and Sindhi TrueType/Opentype fonts.
-
-# mk_pkg <name> <lang-code> 
-%define mk_pkg() \
-%package -n lohit-fonts-%1\
-Summary:    Free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") font\
-Group:      User Interface/X \
-# strictly we only need to provide bn, gu, hi, pa, ta \
-Provides:   ttfonts-%2 = 1.8-2\
-Obsoletes : ttfonts-%2 <= 1.8-1\
-\
-\
-%description -n lohit-fonts-%1\
-This package provides a free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") truetype/opentype font.\
-\
-%files -n lohit-fonts-%1\
-%defattr(-, root, root, -)\
-%doc COPYING README AUTHORS\
-%dir %{xfontdir}/lohit-%1\
-%{xfontdir}/lohit-%1/*.ttf\
-\
-%post -n lohit-fonts-%1 \
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \
-fi \
-\
-%postun -n lohit-fonts-%1 \
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then \
-  if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir} \
-  fi \
-fi 
-
-%mk_pkg bengali bn 
-%mk_pkg gujarati gu
-%mk_pkg hindi hi
-%mk_pkg kannada kn 
-%mk_pkg malayalam ml 
-%mk_pkg oriya or 
-%mk_pkg punjabi pa
-%mk_pkg tamil ta 
-%mk_pkg telugu te
-%mk_pkg marathi mr
-%mk_pkg maithili mai
-%mk_pkg kashmiri ks
-%mk_pkg konkani kok
-%mk_pkg nepali ne
-%mk_pkg sindhi sd
+%define common_desc \
+The fonts named 'Lohit' which means 'Red' in Sanskrit were initially released \
+by Red Hat. The complete collection currently supports scripts for 15 Indian \
+Languages.
+
+
+Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
+Version:        2.3.1
+Release:        2%{?dist}
+Summary:        Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
+
+Group:          User Interface/X
+License:        GPLv2
+URL:            https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/
+Source:        http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
+
+%description
+%common_desc
+
+
+%package common
+Summary:        Common files of Lohit fonts
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
+
+%description common
+%common_desc
+
+This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts
+Summary:        Free Bengali font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-bengali = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-bengali < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Bengali truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n bengali lohit_bn.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
+Summary:        Free Gujarati font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-gujarati = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-gujarati < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-gujarati-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Gujarati truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n gujarati lohit_gu.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-hindi-fonts
+Summary:        Free Gujarati font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-hindi = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-hindi < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-hindi-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Hindi truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n hindi lohit_hi.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-kannada-fonts
+Summary:        Free Kannada font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-kannada = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-kannada < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-kannada-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Kannada truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n kannada lohit_kn.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-kashmiri-fonts
+Summary:        Free Kashmiri font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-kashmiri = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-kashmiri < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-kashmiri-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Kashmiri truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n kashmiri lohit_ks.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-konkani-fonts
+Summary:        Free Konkani font 
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-konkani = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-konkani < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-konkani-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Konkani truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n konkani lohit_kok.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-maithili-fonts
+Summary:        Free Maithili font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-maithili = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-maithili < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-maithili-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Maithili truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n maithili lohit_mai.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
+Summary:        Free Malayalam font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-malayalam = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-malayalam < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-malayalam-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Malayalam truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n malayalam lohit_ml.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-marathi-fonts
+Summary:        Free Marathi font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-marathi = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-marathi < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-marathi-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Marathi truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n marathi lohit_mr.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-nepali-fonts
+Summary:        Free Nepali font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-nepali = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-nepali < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-nepali-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Nepali truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n nepali lohit_ne.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
+Summary:        Free Oriya font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-oriya = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-oriya < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-oriya-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Oriya truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n oriya lohit_or.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-punjabi-fonts
+Summary:        Free Punjabi font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-punjabi = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-punjabi < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-punjabi-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Punjabi truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n punjabi lohit_pa.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-sindhi-fonts
+Summary:        Free Sindhi font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-sindhi = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-sindhi < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-sindhi-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Sindhi truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n sindhi lohit_sd.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
+Summary:        Free Tamil font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-tamil = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-tamil < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-tamil-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Tamil truetype/opentype font.
+
+%_font_pkg -n tamil lohit_ta.ttf
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-telugu-fonts
+Summary:        Free Telugu font
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Provides: lohit-fonts-telugu = %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: lohit-fonts-telugu < 2.3.1-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-telugu-fonts
+%common_desc
+This package provides a free Telugu truetype/opentype font.
 
+%_font_pkg -n telugu lohit_te.ttf
 
 %prep
-%setup -q -n lohit-fonts-%{version}
+%setup -q
+
 
 %build
-echo "Nothing to do in Build."
+
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-for i in "%{langlist}"
-do
-  install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/lohit-$i
-  install -m 0644 $i/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/lohit-$i
-done
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p */*.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+
+#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+#                  %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
 
 %clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
+
+
+%files common
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
+%doc COPYING README AUTHORS ChangeLog
+
+%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 13 2009 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> - 2.3.1-2.fc11
+- Updated according to new font packaging guidelines.
 
 * Tue Sep 09 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> - 2.3.1-1
 - Bug 216400: [te_IN] anaconda GUI - Release Notes button overlaps with other text
 
 * Wed Aug 20 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> - 2.3.0-1
 - Forked Lohit Hindi into Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, Konkani, Sindhi and Nepali.
-- Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others)
+- Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has
+  width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others)
 - Bug 445176: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph
 - Improved Anchoring(blwm Anchor-0) for Hindi font.
 - Corrected positioning of U+0953 for Hindi font.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 12:25:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:25:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477420-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477420-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902131225.n1DCP6mB010637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




--- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-13 07:25:05 EDT ---
Done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 15:14:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:14:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902131514.n1DFELdG018491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #13 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com>  2009-02-13 10:14:20 EDT ---
Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja? Can you attach the
44-wqy-zenhei.conf file and the debug output:
  FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 16:06:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902131606.n1DG60NO019567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #4 from Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de>  2009-02-13 11:05:59 EDT ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts (change to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts)
New Branches: none
Owners: palango

I did a mistake with the package name when filling it into the Request. Sorry
for that!
Could you please rename the package to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts . 
Thank you very much and sorry for the circumstances.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 17:33:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:33:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902131733.n1DHXVvl006324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709





--- Comment #22 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-13 12:33:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > yum remove cjkunifonts-uming
> > fontforge now works
> > yum groupupdate Fonts
> > This will reinstall cjkunifonts-uming and things break.  So the default fonts
> > installed are causing the fontforge breakage and specifically
> > cjkunifonts-uming.
> 
> Dwayne, could you please file a separate bug against cjkunifonts (or
> cjkuni-fonts if it is rawhide) - this sounds unrelated to this bug.

Its related in that it does the same thing, but on a different font.  See bug
485472 for a report against cjkunifonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 17:32:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:32:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] New: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
Message-ID: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472

           Summary: cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: cjkunifonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
cjkunifonts breaks fontforge operation.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum groupinstall Fonts - ensures we have a standard font install
2. fontforge - breaks
3. yum remove cjkunifonts-uming
4. fontforge - words

Actual results:
When crashing we get a message like this:
Help! Server claimed font
        -some font file name (I can't remember it)
 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
 I may crash soon.
 Segmentation fault


Expected results:
fontforge works regardless of whether these fonts are installed.

Additional info:
A similar problem was reported in bug 450709 against xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 fonts

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 13 23:06:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:06:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902132306.n1DN6ZaS009663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481





--- Comment #11 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at no-log.org>  2009-02-13 18:06:34 EDT ---
Just removed it. Upstream said they might not ship it any more in their next
release.

Building right now on Koji for F9, F10 and Rawhide.

Will land in the repositories soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 01:30:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:30:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902140130.n1E1UCGh016589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |a.badger at gmail.com
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>  2009-02-13 20:30:11 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 14 07:46:22 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:46:22 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090214074622.D52391B8033@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 09:22:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:22:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902140922.n1E9MFuA011807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #32 from Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-02-14 04:22:14 EDT ---
On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update.

VLGothic fonts:
vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch

Baekmuk fonts:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch

Is this also related to this report?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:50:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:50:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141250.n1ECoKY2018265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477420, which changed state.

Bug 477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:50:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:50:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477420-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477420-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141250.n1ECoJH6018235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-14 07:50:18 EDT ---
Looks nice. Maybe some over-enthusiastic providing, but that's a maintainer
choice.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

BTW: would be even nicer is lohit was built from sources in %build like other
well-behaved floss fonts such as liberation or dejavu

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:54:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:54:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-478891-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141254.n1ECsFlg000819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-14 07:54:14 EDT ---
A new package request will be very welcome :p

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:53:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:53:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141253.n1ECrito000732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-14 07:53:43 EDT ---
Will all the font changes in rawhide it would probably not be total waste if
people with CJK knowledge did install all the rawhide font packages and check
we do the right thing for sans/serif/monospace for CJK languages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:58:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141258.n1ECwMFq001703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-14 07:58:21 EDT ---
Always feel free to close bugs once you've done the changes and checked they do
what was intended, reporters are not always timely available to close bugs :p

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 12:58:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141258.n1ECwNem001733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477458, which changed state.

Bug 477458 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 13:44:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:44:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] New: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese
 characters get rendered with a different font
Message-ID: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562

           Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese
                    characters get rendered with a different font
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: VLGothic-fonts
        AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net
        ReportedBy: kee at ketan.jp
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=331920)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331920)
Rendering comparison

Description of problem:
After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese
characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently
a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is
followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example),
the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but
with a Chinese one.

This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before.
See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing.
The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font.

Actual results:
Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font.

Expected results:
Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font.

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 14:27:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:27:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485566] New: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering
 English, even in Japanese locale.
Message-ID: <bug-485566-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering English, even in Japanese locale.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566

           Summary: Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering
                    English, even in Japanese locale.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: medium
         Component: fontconfig
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

As you know, fontconfig finds proper fonts for text rendering, 
depending on locales of process and text to render.
It works properly in the most cases, but there are some sever cases.

For example, if you type only "@" or "}" in gedit, 
it uses glyph of VLGothic in Japanese locale.
However, if you type "a" after the first character, 
it changes one's mind to choose glyphs of DejaVu fonts.
It's very annoying for Japanese users.

In the worst cases, the width of the indentations of sourcecode seems
different.
(As the width of the " " glyphs are differ between VLGothic and DejaVu)

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login X11 as a Japanese.
2. Open gedit and change the configuration to use "Monospace".
3. Type "@" on the first line, and "@a" on the first line.

Actual results:
"@" seems differ between the two lines.

Expected results:
"@" seems the same between the two lines.
The same glyph should be used for rendering the two "@".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 14:34:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:34:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering
 English, even in Japanese locale.
In-Reply-To: <bug-485566-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485566-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141434.n1EEYNDZ005279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566





--- Comment #1 from Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-02-14 09:34:23 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=331924)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331924)
A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to
Japanese glyphs.

This configuration make fontconfig prefer DejaVu glyphs to Japanese glyphs in
rendering English.
When you apply this, fontconfig uses DejaVu glyphs for rendering "@" in
Japanese locale.
Note, this configuration will not affect on font selection order for Japanese
characters.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 15:26:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:26:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese
 characters get rendered with a different font
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141526.n1EFQT2l014027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Clone Of|                            |#485562




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 15:24:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:24:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485566] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering
 English, even in Japanese locale.
In-Reply-To: <bug-485566-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485566-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141524.n1EFOM7Y027454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566


Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #331924|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #2 from Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-02-14 10:24:22 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=331925)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331925)
A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to
Japanese glyphs.

A new configuration file to force fontconfig to prefer DejaVu glyphs to
Japanese glyphs.
After installing this configuration, fontconfig uses DejaVu glyph as far as
possible 
even in Japanese locale.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 14 16:27:00 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel Makefile,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090214162700.AF44170136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17519/devel

Modified Files:
	Makefile 
Log Message:
change devel/Makefile to new cvs name


Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- Makefile	13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000	1.1
+++ Makefile	14 Feb 2009 16:26:30 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Makefile for source rpm: hartke-aurulent-fonts
 # $Id$
-NAME := hartke-aurulent-fonts
+NAME := hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts
 SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec))
 
 define find-makefile-common



From palango at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 14 16:36:40 2009
From: palango at fedoraproject.org (Paul Lange)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel
	hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec, NONE,
	1.1 hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090214163640.6874D7012C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: palango

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19009/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf 
	hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec 
	hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf import.log 
Log Message:
* Sat Feb 14 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20070504-1
- initial import



--- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Aurulent Sans</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>Aurulent Sans</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname hartke-aurulent-sans
%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf
%define fontconfmono 64-%{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf
%define archivename AurulentSans-20070504

%define common_desc \
Aurulent Sans is a sans-serif font developed for use as the primary interface\
font on X Windows on GNU/Linux. It includes the latin alphabet, digits, and\
punctuation, as well as some accents. It is created by Stephen G. Hartke.

Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
Version:        20070504
Release:        1%{?dist}
Summary:        A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font

Group:          User Interface/X
License:        OFL
URL:            http://www.geocities.com/hartke01/
Source0:        %{url}%{archivename}.tgz
Source1:        %{fontname}-fonts-fontconfig.conf
Source2:        %{fontname}-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf
Source3:        %{archivename}.pdf
BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)

BuildArch:      noarch
BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description
%common_desc
This package includes the Aurulent Sans font family.

%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} AurulentSans-*.otf

%package common
Summary:        Common files of the Aurulent font family
Group:          User Interface/X
Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other
%{name} packages.

%package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
Summary:        Aurulent Sans Mono font family
Group:          User Interface/X
Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts
%common_desc
This package includes the Aurulent Sans Mono font family.

%_font_pkg -n mono -f %{fontconfmono} AurulentSansMono-*.otf


%prep
%setup -q -c
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} .


%build
#Nothing to do yet. Asked upstream for sources on Feb 01 2009.

%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}

install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}

# Repeat for every font family
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconfmono}

for fconf in %{fontconf}\
             %{fontconfmono}; do
  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done


%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}


%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc README *.pdf

%changelog
* Sun Feb 1 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20070504-1
- initial packaging


--- NEW FILE hartke-aurulent-sans-mono-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>monospace</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>Aurulent Sans Mono</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>Aurulent Sans Mono</family>
    <default>
      <family>monospace</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>



--- NEW FILE import.log ---
hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1_fc10:HEAD:hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1.fc10.src.rpm:1234629201


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	14 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+AurulentSans-20070504.pdf
+AurulentSans-20070504.tgz


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	13 Feb 2009 06:36:21 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	14 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+68ec032a385b1f8b295c1a371db0579a  AurulentSans-20070504.pdf
+a56076e91469e5ed65a714ac666b3def  AurulentSans-20070504.tgz



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 16:45:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:45:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485569] New: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
Message-ID: <bug-485569-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485569

           Summary: x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: x86_64
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: fontconfig
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: john.ellson at comcast.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
After various font rpm churn on rawhide my 32 bit application would crash with
a malloc failure because of a messed up font cache.

One could wonder:
   a) why is the 32 bit cache different from the 64 bit?
   b) why isn't fontconfig keeping them both uptodate?
but I have a simpler request:

"man fc-cache" states:
   Note that fc-cache must be executed once per architecture  to  generate
   font information customized for that architecture.

but it isn't possible to do this on x86_64 because only the 64 bit version of
/usr/bin/fc-cache is installed, even if both i386 and x86_64 fontconfig rpms
are installed.  

** Request that /usr/bin/fc-cache-64 and /usr/bin/fc-cache-32 both be
installed, and that a new /usr/bin/fc-cache shell script be created that runs
them both.

The man page also says:
   On a subsequent run, fc-cache will augment the cache information
   files with the  information for the new architecture.
but apparently this didn't work through some series of font rpm upgrades.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd /var/cache/fontconfig
2. rm *
3. fc-cache

Actual results:
Only *x86-64.cache-2 files created

Expected results:
Both *x86.cache-2 and *x86-64.cache-2 files created

Additional info:
Any ugly workaround to the current situation is:
    rpm -e --nodeps --allmatches fontconfig fontconfig-devel
    yum install fontconfig.i386
    fc-cache
    yum install fontconfig.x86_64 fontconfig-devel.x86_64
    fc-cache

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 18:24:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:24:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A
 sans-serif font
In-Reply-To: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484379-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902141824.n1EIOf1b022989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379


Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 21:44:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:44:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902142144.n1ELiKWO010937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-14 16:44:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created an attachment (id=331334)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331334) [details]
> New spec
> 
> Nicholas, how does this look?

This one looks better, however to completely convert freefont you should:

1. rename the base package to gnu-free-fonts
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

2. build from the sfd sources upstream publishes
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Building_from_sources

3. add a few fontconfig rules
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F

4. try to stay closer to the template by using the same declaration order and
spacing lines (makes it so much easier to check in a diff tool)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Can_I_re-indent.2Fre-order_the_fonts_packaging_template.3F

5. remove the "Requires:  fontconfig". It is contrary to packaging guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Install-time_dependencies

6. probably be more conservative with provides
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

7. use -compat as metapackage if you need one
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_old_package_is_replaced_by_several_new_packages.21

8. use nice names for your subpackages via -n as suggested by the templates
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_font_packaging_changes_are_needed_with_post-1.13_fontpackages.3F


Piece of cake :p

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org  Sat Feb 14 22:04:08 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Bug 20120] New: Display font script coverage info in the UI
Message-ID: <bug-20120-10034@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20120

           Summary: Display font script coverage info in the UI
           Product: PackageKit
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: General
        AssignedTo: richard at hughsie.com
        ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
                CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com


To make fonts auto-install work coverage auto-provides are being added to font
packages.

However, those provides are not only useful for auto-installation. 

Users are just as interested to know they can use a font package to render
Greek or Catalan or Arabic when browsing the package repository manually.

Please transform those provides in user-friendly information added to font
package descriptions in packagekit GUI frontends.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 22:52:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:52:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477406-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477406-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902142252.n1EMqgYg023200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |4.2.0-6
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 14 22:52:43 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:52:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902142252.n1EMqhcf023230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477406, which changed state.

Bug 477406 Summary: kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 05:59:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:59:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese
 characters get rendered with a different font
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902150559.n1F5xoK7032239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Clone Of|#485562                     |475743




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 15 08:11:05 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090215081105.DF9F31F8256@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From nmailhot at openoffice.org  Sun Feb 15 10:35:41 2009
From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org)
Date: 15 Feb 2009 10:35:41 -0000
Subject: [Issue 76587] WW8: MathType object displayed without brackets etc.
In-Reply-To: <iz76587@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090215103541.22109.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76587


User nmailhot changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'hcostelha,kpalagin'      |'fedorafonts,hcostelha,kpa
                        |                          |lagin'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:12:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151812.n1FIC5Rb004289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state.

Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:14:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:14:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be
 inputted.
In-Reply-To: <bug-462041-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462041-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151814.n1FIEpXT004643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com)




--- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 13:14:50 EDT ---
confirmed fixed in rawhide
please close this bug

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:13:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FID7Or004447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state.

Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:12:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:12:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151812.n1FIC46F004264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-15 13:12:04 EDT ---
Latest spec shows a dep on a dejavu package name that will go away before F11
beta

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:13:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:13:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151813.n1FID6Wr004421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-15 13:13:05 EDT ---
Latest spec shows a dep on a dejavu package name that will go away before F11
beta

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:21:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151821.n1FILAm7022022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state.

Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:21:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:21:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477410-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151821.n1FIL8Nt021980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #19 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 13:21:07 EDT ---
comps.xml is updated
close this bug

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:33:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:33:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be
 inputted.
In-Reply-To: <bug-462041-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462041-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151833.n1FIX53A007706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
               Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com)  |




--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-15 13:33:04 EDT ---
Will do. thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:36:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:36:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151836.n1FIaOu8024754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477374, which changed state.

Bug 477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 15 18:36:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:36:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902151836.n1FIaNCH024721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |oron at actcom.co.il
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-15 13:36:22 EDT ---
1. your -compat package needs to obsolete culmus-fonts <
thisversion-thisrelease for the upgrade path to work
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_old_package_is_replaced_by_several_new_packages.21

2. if you don't add a suitably threatening description to your compat package
people will do stupid stuff such as adding new deps on it
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=82799

3. Your descriptions and summaries may need a little work, maybe ask the Hebrew
localization team for help?
http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he

4. I'd have followed
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf

a bit more closely to make sure the fonts are registered in the correct generic
families but that's your choice to make of course

The Obsolete bit is the only part which is likely to be a big problem short
term

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From behdad at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 15 22:05:57 2009
From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.36, 1.37 fontconfig.spec, 1.118,
	1.119 sources, 1.37, 1.38
Message-ID: <20090215220557.8D87A70127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: behdad

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5701

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6
- Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37
--- .cvsignore	27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000	1.36
+++ .cvsignore	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.37
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz
+fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz


Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.118
retrieving revision 1.119
diff -u -r1.118 -r1.119
--- fontconfig.spec	27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000	1.118
+++ fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.119
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
-Version: 2.6.95
-Release: 1.git.66.gb162bfb%{?dist}
+Version: 2.6.96
+Release: 1.g0b290a6%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6
+- Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6
+
 * Tue Jan 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb
 - Update to 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
--- sources	27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000	1.37
+++ sources	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.38
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d568673bb06705503b66eac28c2a2e51  fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz
+6b466e0d15417d8d0431a18d1a259c43  fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz



From behdad at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 15 22:30:52 2009
From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.119,1.120
Message-ID: <20090215223052.328A670127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: behdad

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8539

Modified Files:
	fontconfig.spec 
Log Message:
* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
- Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4



Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.119
retrieving revision 1.120
diff -u -r1.119 -r1.120
--- fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.119
+++ fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:30:21 -0000	1.120
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
-Version: 2.6.96
-Release: 1.g0b290a6%{?dist}
+Version: 2.6.97
+Release: 1.g945d6a4%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
+- Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
+
 * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6
 - Update to 2.6.96-1.g0b290a6
 



From behdad at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 15 22:31:52 2009
From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore,1.37,1.38 sources,1.38,1.39
Message-ID: <20090215223152.56F7A70127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: behdad

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8997

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Log Message:
* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
- Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
--- .cvsignore	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.37
+++ .cvsignore	15 Feb 2009 22:31:22 -0000	1.38
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz
+fontconfig-2.6.97.tar.gz


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -r1.38 -r1.39
--- sources	15 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0000	1.38
+++ sources	15 Feb 2009 22:31:22 -0000	1.39
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6b466e0d15417d8d0431a18d1a259c43  fontconfig-2.6.96.tar.gz
+addd72182847a156db9f5f7aa7fb6e91  fontconfig-2.6.97.tar.gz



From behdad at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 15 22:46:47 2009
From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:46:47 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.120,1.121
Message-ID: <20090215224647.3831670127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: behdad

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11739

Modified Files:
	fontconfig.spec 
Log Message:
* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
- Another try.



Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.120
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -r1.120 -r1.121
--- fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:30:21 -0000	1.120
+++ fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:46:16 -0000	1.121
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
 Version: 2.6.97
-Release: 1.g945d6a4%{?dist}
+Release: 2.g945d6a4%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
+- Another try.
+
 * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
 - Update to 2.6.97-1.g945d6a4
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:04:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:04:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160204.n1G2425Q003638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cchance at redhat.com,
                   |                            |petersen at redhat.com
          Component|VLGothic-fonts              |cjkunifonts
         AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |cchance at redhat.com
                   |ge.net                      |
            Summary|vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |Chinese fonts is used for
                   |c10 makes some Japanese     |Japanese desktop after
                   |characters get rendered     |vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f
                   |with a different font       |c10 installed




--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:04:01 EDT ---
Better reassigning to cjkunifonts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:10:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:10:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 434753] Sometimes can't display VLGothic via "sansserif"
 family.
In-Reply-To: <bug-434753-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-434753-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160210.n1G2AkmB005213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434753


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA




--- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:10:44 EDT ---
Thanks for testing. closing so that the update is available on F-9 and F-10
now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:21:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160221.n1G2LAhg021777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:21:09 EDT ---
BTW I don't see lowercase name in bugzilla though, is it intentional or?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:34:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:34:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160234.n1G2YRZ2008780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:34:26 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=331999)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331999)
fc-match-4.output.bz2

output for

> FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:33:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:33:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in
 @chinese-support group
In-Reply-To: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160233.n1G2X0mT008583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459





--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:32:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Was your desktop font set as "sans"? and your lang=ja?

Yes it is a default Japanese rawhide install.

> Can you attach the 44-wqy-zenhei.conf file

You mean it works for you in a japanese desktop session? ;-)

35f7bdfcc512ac6cb03a520e702a0c45  /etc/fonts/conf.d/44-wqy-zenhei.conf

(I am not excluding a fontconfig bug: at least the behaviour seems have
changed...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 02:51:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:51:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160251.n1G2pc3j027278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 21:51:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> On Fedora-10, the same bug appears after usual update.
> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-gulim-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-dotum-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-batang-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
> baekmuk-ttf-fonts-hline-2.2-9.fc10.noarch
> baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-5.fc9.noarch

It sounds like it could be.
What if you remove the baekmuk fonts?
(They are not default for Hangul anymore anyway.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 03:02:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:02:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160302.n1G32oAL014341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-15 22:02:49 EDT ---
Can you post the output of:

rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort

It would be hopeful if you can narrow down which font package is causing the
problem.
It might be baekmuk-ttf for example? (see also end of bug 475743 comment 32)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 07:10:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:10:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902160710.n1G7AlQT029450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




--- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 02:10:46 EDT ---
Nicholas, thanks for the suggestions. Here are the updates:
1. added obsoletes to -compat.
2. added the suitable description.
3. so far, I haven't been able to find any documentation on culmus project's
website or anywhere to derive proper description for every subpackage. So
keeping the same generic one.
4. the .conf are derived from the original files from the upstream project,
only split between subpackages.

Hope that works for now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From buildsys at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 07:52:52 2009
From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:52:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-fonts-hebrew
Message-ID: <20090216075252.1DD571B8046@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com>



tetex-fonts-hebrew has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On x86_64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On i386:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
On ppc64:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew-0.1-9.fc10.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
Please resolve this as soon as possible.




From caolanm at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 09:08:55 2009
From: caolanm at fedoraproject.org (Caolan McNamara)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090216090855.62F7C70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: caolanm

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11950

Modified Files:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec 
Log Message:
fonts-hebrew -> culmus-fonts-compat


Index: tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel/tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec	8 Sep 2008 14:16:49 -0000	1.5
+++ tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec	16 Feb 2009 09:08:25 -0000	1.6
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 Summary: Culmus Hebrew fonts support for tetex
 Name: tetex-fonts-hebrew
 Version: 0.1
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 URL: http://culmus.sf.net
 Source: tetex-fonts-hebrew-%{version}.tar.gz
 # No version specified.
 License: GPL+
 Group: Applications/Text
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-BuildRequires: tetex, tetex-afm, fonts-hebrew
-Requires: tetex fonts-hebrew
+BuildRequires: tetex, tetex-afm, culmus-fonts-compat
+Requires: tetex culmus-fonts-compat
 BuildArch: noarch
 Requires(post): /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/updmap-sys
 Requires(postun): /usr/bin/texhash /usr/bin/updmap-sys
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
 /usr/bin/texhash
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Caol??n McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 0.1-10
+- fonts-hebrew -> culmus-fonts-compat
+
 * Mon Sep  8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 0.1-9
 - fix license tag
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 09:58:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:58:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485685] New: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option
 does't work.
Message-ID: <bug-485685-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685

           Summary: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't
                    work.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
 Status Whiteboard: Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't
                    work.
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: fontconfig
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=332015)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332015)
embeddedbitmap bold in firefox ( http://cndic.naver.com/font.nhn )

Description of problem:
Using bold in firefox, embeddedbitmap option does't work.

Then, the others gtk2 programs work well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.6.97-2.g945d6a4.fc11

How reproducible:
always in firefox

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From rhughes at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 11:35:08 2009
From: rhughes at fedoraproject.org (Richard Hughes)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:35:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch,
	NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.121, 1.122
Message-ID: <20090216113508.13E4F70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: rhughes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4358

Modified Files:
	fontconfig.spec 
Added Files:
	fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch 
Log Message:
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4
- Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font().


fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch:

--- NEW FILE fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch ---
diff -urp fontconfig-2.6.97.old/src/fcformat.c fontconfig-2.6.97/src/fcformat.c
--- fontconfig-2.6.97.old/src/fcformat.c	2009-02-16 11:14:54.000000000 +0000
+++ fontconfig-2.6.97/src/fcformat.c	2009-02-16 11:17:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 
 #define FCMATCH_FORMAT	"%{file:-<unknown filename>|basename}: \"%{family[0]:-<unknown family>}\" \"%{style[0]:-<unknown style>}\""
 #define FCLIST_FORMAT	"%{?file{%{file}: }}%{=unparse}"
-#define PKGKIT_FORMAT	"%{[]family{Font(%{family|downcase|delete( )})\n}}%{[]lang{Font(:lang=%{lang|downcase|translate(_,-)})\n}}"
+#define PKGKIT_FORMAT	"%{[]family{font(%{family|downcase|delete( )})\n}}%{[]lang{font(:lang=%{lang|downcase|translate(_,-)})\n}}"
 
 
 static void



Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.121
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -r1.121 -r1.122
--- fontconfig.spec	15 Feb 2009 22:46:16 -0000	1.121
+++ fontconfig.spec	16 Feb 2009 11:34:37 -0000	1.122
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
 Version: 2.6.97
-Release: 2.g945d6a4%{?dist}
+Release: 3.g945d6a4%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root
 Source1: 25-no-bitmap-fedora.conf
 
+# behdad has this in his local tree
+Patch1: fontconfig-2.6.97-fix-provides-name.patch
+
 BuildRequires: gawk
 BuildRequires: expat-devel
 BuildRequires: freetype-devel >= %{freetype_version}
@@ -44,6 +47,7 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q
+%patch1 -p1
 
 %build
 
@@ -131,6 +135,9 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4
+- Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font().
+
 * Sun Feb 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
 - Another try.
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 12:11:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:11:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
In-Reply-To: <bug-485685-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485685-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161211.n1GCBsJd000836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685


sangu <sangu.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Using bold in firefox,      |Embolden Font with
                   |embeddedbitmap option       |embeddedbitmap is ugly  in
                   |does't work.                |firefox.
  Status Whiteboard|Using bold in firefox,      |
                   |embeddedbitmap option       |
                   |does't work.                |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 12:13:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:13:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox.
In-Reply-To: <bug-485685-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485685-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161213.n1GCDEFR000987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685





--- Comment #1 from sangu <sangu.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-02-16 07:13:13 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=332027)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332027)
Embolden font in fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 12:41:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:41:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161241.n1GCfDTd007253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720





--- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com>  2009-02-16 07:41:11 EDT ---
Packages:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec


It builds fine.. I am still having trouble with the %package etc part.. 
This package too, the rpm names arent as they are supposed to be..

Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/SRPMS/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm
Wrote:
/home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm
Wrote:
/home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-general-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm
Wrote:
/home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-lower-case-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm
Wrote:
/home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-small-caps-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm

Ive tried what the multi spec has in it.. Got stuck there.. Doing anything else
with the spec gives me "%post file not found".. I've been stuck there for
almost two weeks until i atleast managed to build this. One of you will have to
please tell me how to do that part properly.. 

The fontforge warning/error persists. It gives a 0 exit status though.. Am
waiting for a reply from the mailing list for confirmation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 13:14:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477373-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE3SL014211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373


Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state.

Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 13:14:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese)
 [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]
In-Reply-To: <bug-253813-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-253813-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE1Xf014144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 14:11:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:11:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485702] New: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig
Message-ID: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702

           Summary: fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: fontpackages
        AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
        ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
See:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1130220
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1130229

The latter one has a lot of Provides:font(bar) in build.log, while
the former does not have any.
This is because in /usr/lib/rpm/fontconfig.prov $fcquery
aborts immediately if fontconfig is not installed (also
see "root.log"s)

Since
- For packages not related to fonts, "BR: fontconfig" is not
  needed
- Current font packaging guidelines "suggests" to include
  "BR: fontpackages-devel" (I don't know if this is "should" or
  "must" or just "is better")
adding "R: fontconfig" to fontpackages-devel seems the best
idea

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-devel-1.18-1.fc11

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Rebuild srpm related to fonts which seems to match
   current font packaging guidelines with mockbuild
2. rpm -q --provides <the rebuild package>

Actual results:
None of the virtual Provides related to fonts can be seen

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 14:21:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:21:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig
In-Reply-To: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161421.n1GELauS012288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-16 09:21:35 EDT ---
I'll push a new fontpackage release this evening (CET). It's almost ready, I
was just waiting to make sure Behdad and Panu didn't change their mind again
(they pushed the rpm/fontconfig plumbing a few hours ago in koji)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 14:54:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:54:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161454.n1GEsdp7007067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|cjkuni-fonts                |fontconfig
         AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com          |besfahbo at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 14:53:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:53:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161453.n1GEr1q0006791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-02-16 09:52:55 EDT ---
fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem......

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 15:51:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:51:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161551.n1GFpULa016711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 15:55:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:55:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161555.n1GFtsEC017983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n




--- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 10:55:53 EDT ---
This one might be duplicated to bug #475743.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 15:54:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:54:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161554.n1GFsFPI003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #35 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 10:54:14 EDT ---
I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 15:46:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161546.n1GFk1NM014615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME




--- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 10:46:01 EDT ---
Not reproducible in latest yum update:

cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch
fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 16:49:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:49:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161649.n1GGno44023776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720





--- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com>  2009-02-16 11:49:50 EDT ---
This is what George said about the error,"It indicates an internal problem in
fontforge that will sometimes cause
an error. You can correct it by rewriting fontforge's code so that it
handles rounding errors better. This is not something I can do, but if
you can please do so.". I certainly cannot rewrite the code to fontforge. How
should i handle it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:05:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry
In-Reply-To: <bug-481434-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481434-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5dVn027966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |485746




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:05:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold
In-Reply-To: <bug-479371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-479371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5cpu027941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |485746




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:05:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of  Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation
 Regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-474734-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-474734-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5aD4027918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |485746




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:05:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2)  in Sans and Mono
 style in Liberation fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-474522-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-474522-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5Zsj027889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |485746




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:05:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485746] (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts.
In-Reply-To: <bug-485746-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485746-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161705.n1GH5ZsH027872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |481434, 479371, 474734,
                   |                            |474522




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 17:03:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:03:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485746] New: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts.
Message-ID: <bug-485746-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485746

           Summary: (tracker) Hinting of Liberation Fonts.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: i18n
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


This is a tracker bug for tracking all hinting issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 18:31:28 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 fontpackages.spec, 1.9,
	1.10 import.log, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.8, 1.9
Message-ID: <20090216183128.EF6FE70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15454/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources 
Log Message:
1.19


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- .cvsignore	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
+++ .cvsignore	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- fontpackages.spec	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.9
+++ fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.10
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 %define rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
-Version: 1.18
+Version: 1.19
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
@@ -13,8 +13,11 @@
 License:   LGPLv3+
 URL:       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
 Source0:   http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
-BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+
+BuildArch:     noarch
+BuildRoot:     %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+BuildRequires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3
+
 
 %description
 This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros
@@ -23,7 +26,6 @@
 
 %package filesystem
 Summary: Directories used by font packages
-Group:   User Interface/X
 License: Public Domain
 
 %description filesystem
@@ -33,9 +35,10 @@
 
 %package devel
 Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages
-Group:   User Interface/X
 
-Requires:  rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
+Requires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3
 
 %description devel
 This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to
@@ -98,6 +101,13 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.19-1
+??? Add a fontconfig dep to -devel so font autoprovides work (bz#485702)
+??? Drop duplicated group declarations, rpm has been fixed (bz#470714)
+??? Add partial templates for fonts subpackages of non-font source packages
+??? Make them noarch (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages)
+
 * Thu Feb 5 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 1.18-1
 ??? Panu wants autoprovides in rpm proper, drop it


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- import.log	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
+++ import.log	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014
 fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931
 fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977
+fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- sources	5 Feb 2009 20:11:39 -0000	1.8
+++ sources	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-afcfbffe48379897aaaf7260ec2f931d  fontpackages-1.18.tar.bz2
+e46a2ed63b41f3dd113609aaa5c8f437  fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 18:41:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:41:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig
In-Reply-To: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161841.n1GIfbAf018284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-16 13:41:35 EDT ---
A new fontpackages has been pushed however it depends for other reasons on the
new rpm that will be pushed koji-side tomorrow

Feel free to re-start the build as soon as this new rpm is deployed on the
builders (if I miss it)

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1131126&name=srpm.log

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 19:49:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log,
	1.9, 1.10
Message-ID: <20090216194951.CD0B970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29767/devel

Modified Files:
	fontpackages.spec import.log 
Log Message:
workaround current crufty koji


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.10
+++ fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000	1.11
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:    fontpackages
 Version: 1.19
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
 Group:     Development/System
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 
 %package filesystem
 Summary: Directories used by font packages
+Group:   Development/System
 License: Public Domain
 
 %description filesystem
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
 
 %package devel
 Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages
+Group:   Development/System
 
 Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
@@ -102,6 +104,8 @@
 
 %changelog
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.19-2
+??? workaround the fact koji is not ready yet
 - 1.19-1
 ??? Add a fontconfig dep to -devel so font autoprovides work (bz#485702)
 ??? Drop duplicated group declarations, rpm has been fixed (bz#470714)


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- import.log	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
+++ import.log	16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000	1.10
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
 fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931
 fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977
 fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006
+fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 19:58:42 2009
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216195842.7D86470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31207

Modified Files:
	tiresias-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix packaging


Index: tiresias-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- tiresias-fonts.spec	15 Jan 2009 20:36:45 -0000	1.2
+++ tiresias-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 19:58:12 -0000	1.3
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Summary: 	Low vision fonts
 Version:	1.0
-Release:	3%{?dist}
+Release:	4%{?dist}
 License:	GPLv3+
 Group:		User Interface/X
 Source0:	http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/infofont.zip
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
 
 The Keyfont V2 family is specialized for use in labeling keycaps.
 
-%_font_pkg -n key-v2 -f %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf "TIREKV__.ttf"
+%_font_pkg -n key-v2 -f %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf TIREKV__.ttf
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-lp-fonts
 Summary:	Specialized font for large print publications
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.0-4
+- fix packaging
+
 * Thu Jan 15 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.0-3
 - rework to meet new font packaging guidelines
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 19:58:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485702] fontpackages-devel should require fontconfig
In-Reply-To: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485702-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902161958.n1GJw8wU008205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-16 14:58:07 EDT ---
Oh, well, I can't wait. Pushed a band-aid

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485702

Just don't try to use the templates in there before koji is updated.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 20:32:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 462295] fonts package list need to be updated
In-Reply-To: <bug-462295-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462295-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWPh5016718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462295


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

Andy Lindeberg <alindebe at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 22:05:15 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 21:48:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:48:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902162148.n1GLmcJn010117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042





--- Comment #6 from Toshio Kuratomi <tkuratom at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 16:48:38 EDT ---
I've renamed the VLGothic-fonts entry in bugzilla to vlgothic-fonts.  It's not
possible in bugzilla to have two components that only differ in case so
hopefully this is fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:27:02 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:27:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 import.log, 1.3,
	1.4 sources, 1.6, 1.7 xgridfit.spec, 1.8, 1.9
Message-ID: <20090216232702.E5FBF70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5661/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec 
Log Message:
1.17a


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- .cvsignore	30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000	1.6
+++ .cvsignore	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz
+xgridfit-1-17a.tar.gz


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275
 xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397
 xgridfit-1_17-1_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233346359
+xgridfit-1_17-2_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-2.a.fc11.src.rpm:1234826759


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources	30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000	1.6
+++ sources	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-82b4f14d1bb1fb89a38da0cff19cb05e  xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz
+943b0540441d7184977f60b1b0dc4a59  xgridfit-1-17a.tar.gz


Index: xgridfit.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- xgridfit.spec	30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000	1.8
+++ xgridfit.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define archivever 1-17
+%define archivever 1-17a
 
 Name:    xgridfit
 Version: 1.17
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2.a%{?dist}
 Summary: Font hinting tool
 
 # This is where we drop fontforge
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
 
 
 %build
-# Nothing to do
 
 
 %install
@@ -84,26 +83,29 @@
 
 
 %changelog
-* Fri Jan 30 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.17-2.a
+
+* Fri Jan 30 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.17-1
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.11-1.a
 ??? update for F11 cycle
 
-* Mon Sep 1 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.9-1
 ??? Major update, many changes
 ??? Only package xsltproc support for now
 
-* Sun May 18 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun May 18 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.6-3
 ??? Lots of new makefile goodness
 
-* Thu Mar 13 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Thu Mar 13 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.5-2
 ??? Fix path munging
 
-* Tue Mar 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Tue Mar 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.5-1
 ??? Initial Fedora packaging



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233348.43A3170101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000	1.2
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:17 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081007
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -59,69 +59,71 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
 
 %doc *.txt README
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Feb  8 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
-- 20081007-4 
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20081007-5
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Feb  8 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20081007-4
 ??? test new rpm font autoprovides
 
-* Sun Jan 25 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Jan 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-3
 ??? renamed to ???apanov-edrip-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-2
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-1
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Wed Sep 3 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Wed Sep 3 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080826-2
 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge
 
-* Mon Sep 1 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080826-1
 ?? Still more extended cyrillic coverage
 
-* Fri Jul 17 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080717-1
 ???? More cyrillic coverage
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080710-1
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 
-* Wed Jun 4 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Wed Jun 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080523-2
 ??? Fix URL
 ??? Register in new fantasy generic
 
-* Mon May 26 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon May 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080523-1
 ?? Add bold italic typeface to the font package
 ?? Use new upstream makefile magic to simplify spec
 
-* Sun May 18 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun May 18 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080515-2
 ??? Add bold & italic typeface to the font package
 
-* Fri Apr 4 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Apr 4 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080330-1
 ??? Fast upstream changes
 
-* Tue Mar 27 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Tue Mar 27 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080317-3
 ??? Fix source URL
 ??? Add more fontconfig magic
 
-* Wed Mar 26 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Wed Mar 26 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080317-1
 ??? Fedora import
 
-* Thu Mar 13 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Thu Mar 13 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080310-1
 ??? Initial packaging



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.3,
	1.4
Message-ID: <20090216233348.6C16970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000	1.3
+++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.4
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20090125
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: Heuristica font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -55,27 +55,30 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-*Fri Jan 30 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20090125-2
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+*Fri Jan 30 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20090125-1
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081109-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Sun Nov 16 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 16 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081109-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 - 20081109-1
 ??? Fedora import
 
-* Fri Oct 10 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Oct 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080825-1
 ?? FE-LEGAL lifted ??? update package in review request
 
-* Fri Jun 20 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jun 20 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080619-1
 ?? Initial packaging



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec,1.95,1.96
Message-ID: <20090216233348.E068170101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/dejavu-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.95
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	8 Feb 2009 09:12:05 -0000	1.95
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.96
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.28
-Release: 4%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData}
 
 BuildArch:     noarch
-BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.17
+BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
 
 %description
 %common_desc
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@
 
 %package compat
 Summary: DejaVu fonts compatibility package
-Group:   User Interface/X
 
 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
@@ -67,7 +66,6 @@
 
 %package lgc-compat
 Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility package
-Group:   User Interface/X
 
 Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3
 
@@ -81,7 +79,6 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:  Common files for the Dejavu font set
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
 
 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc < 2.26-6
@@ -94,14 +91,12 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width sans-serif font faces
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 2.28-2
-Provides:  %{name}-sans = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -114,14 +109,12 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width serif font faces
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 2.28-2
-Provides:  %{name}-serif = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -134,14 +127,12 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
 Summary:  Monospace sans-serif font faces
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 2.28-2
-Provides:  %{name}-sans-mono = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
 %common_desc
@@ -154,7 +145,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3
@@ -172,7 +162,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3
@@ -190,7 +179,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts
 Summary:  Monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3
@@ -254,7 +242,12 @@
 
 
 %changelog
-* Thu Feb  5  2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 2.28-5
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+??? drop compatibility provides as announced at F11 alpha time
+
+* Thu Feb  5 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 2.28-4
 ??? Test build with new fontpackages and in-rpm auto-font-provides
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233349.22D7270101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/ecolier-court-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	ecolier-court-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ecolier-court-fonts.spec	17 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0000	1.6
+++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.7
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 %define fontconf 61-%{fontname}
 
 %define common_desc\
-This set of Latin fonts was created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \
+??colier court fonts were created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \
 traditional cursive writing French children are taught in school. \
 \
 He kindly released two of them under the OFL, which are redistributed in \
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070702
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
 Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:  Common files of the ??colier Court font set
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description common
@@ -49,7 +48,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-lignes-fonts
 Summary:  Schoolchildren cursive fonts with lines
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-lignes < 20070702-7
@@ -107,27 +105,29 @@
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc *.txt
 
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-
 
 %changelog
-* Sat Jan 17 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070702-8
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sat Jan 17 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-7
 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines
 
-* Wed Dec 17 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Wed Dec 17 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-5
 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpm unicode bug to fix koji build
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-4
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-3
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Sat Jul 19 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sat Jul 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-1
 ??? Stop waitting for upstream to answer distribution change requests
 ??? FESCO chickened out on UTF-8 names



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec,1.11,1.12
Message-ID: <20090216233349.5D8DE70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/fontpackages/devel

Modified Files:
	fontpackages.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000	1.11
+++ fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.12
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:    fontpackages
 Version: 1.19
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
 Group:     Development/System
@@ -14,9 +14,8 @@
 URL:       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
 Source0:   http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
 
-BuildArch:     noarch
-BuildRoot:     %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
-BuildRequires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3
+BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
 
 %description
@@ -26,7 +25,6 @@
 
 %package filesystem
 Summary: Directories used by font packages
-Group:   Development/System
 License: Public Domain
 
 %description filesystem
@@ -36,11 +34,9 @@
 
 %package devel
 Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages
-Group:   Development/System
 
 Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires: fontconfig > 2.6.97-2.g945d6a4
-Requires: rpm-build > 4.6.0-3
+Requires: fontconfig
 
 %description devel
 This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to
@@ -104,6 +100,8 @@
 
 %changelog
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.19-3
+??? remove workaround and explicit version checks
 - 1.19-2
 ??? workaround the fact koji is not ready yet
 - 1.19-1



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:48 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.12,
	1.13
Message-ID: <20090216233348.A83FF70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 -0000	1.12
+++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.13
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.10
-Release: 14%{?dist}
+Release: 15%{?dist}
 Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
 
 %package compat
 Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility
-Group:   User Interface/X
 
 Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9
 Requires:  %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
@@ -40,7 +39,6 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:  Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description common
@@ -51,7 +49,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 1.10-13
@@ -67,7 +64,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
 Summary:  Variable-width serif Bitstream Vera fonts
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 1.10-13
@@ -82,7 +78,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
 Summary:  Monospace sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 1.10-13
@@ -118,11 +113,13 @@
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc *.TXT
 
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-
 
 %changelog
-* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.10-15
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.10-14
 ??? update for new naming guidelines
 ??? build with new fontpackages (1.15)



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233349.A2ACC70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:25:25 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080624
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -77,9 +77,13 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080624-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
 * Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080624-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.8,
	1.9
Message-ID: <20090216233350.1224D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:28:57 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070327
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Baskerville Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -80,18 +80,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070327-11
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070327-10
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070327-9
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070327-8
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,
	1.7, 1.8
Message-ID: <20090216233350.51FF770136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:30:55 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Bodoni Classic oblique Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -75,18 +75,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-10
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-9
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-8
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090216233350.9C8BD70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:32:35 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Bodoni fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -63,18 +63,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-9
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-8
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-7
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-6
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090216233349.CE88E70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:27:14 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Artemisia fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -66,18 +66,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-10
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-9
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-8
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233350.D2E0970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:34:18 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070413
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Complutum Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -85,19 +85,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070413-11
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070413-10
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070413-9
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070413-8
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.7,
	1.8
Message-ID: <20090216233351.1360470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:35:56 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080702
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -74,18 +74,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080702-5
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080702-4
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080702-3
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080702-2
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233351.51A3D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-didot-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-didot-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:37:36 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070616
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Didot fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -62,18 +62,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070616-10
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070616-9
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070616-8
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070616-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233351.8057070101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:39:21 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080303-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233351.BA71970101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:41:00 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -78,14 +78,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080303-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233352.064D470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:42:45 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080707
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -74,14 +74,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080707-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080707-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080707-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090216233352.3AD2C70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:44:27 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.8
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080318
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -73,14 +73,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080318-6
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080318-5
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080318-4
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233352.6F0BC70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:46:11 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -80,15 +80,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080303-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090216233352.D624D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:49:49 -0000	1.2
+++ gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -76,14 +76,18 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080303-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.6,
	1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233352.A106470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:47:54 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -82,18 +82,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
+
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
--  20070415-8
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-9
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-8
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-7
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-6
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233353.27A1D70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-olga-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-olga-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-olga-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:51:36 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Olga experimental oblique font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -72,19 +72,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20060908-9
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-8
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-7
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-6
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233353.6B14470101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-porson-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-porson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-porson-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:53:31 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Porson Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -73,19 +73,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20060908-11
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-10
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-9
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-8
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233353.A815970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:55:21 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20071114
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Solomos oblique Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -79,19 +79,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20071114-10
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20071114-9
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20071114-8
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20071114-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel sil-andika-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090216233354.5C38970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/sil-andika-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	sil-andika-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: sil-andika-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sil-andika-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-andika-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 -0000	1.1
+++ sil-andika-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.2
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.0
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -79,22 +79,25 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Jan 25 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.0-5
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Jan 25 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0-4
 ??? renamed to ???sil-andika-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0-2
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Tue Jun 24 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Tue Jun 24 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0-1
 ??? Initial packaging



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel stix-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233354.D5ADB70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/stix-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	stix-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: stix-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- stix-fonts.spec	16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 -0000	1.6
+++ stix-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.7
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 0.9
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-pua-fonts
 Summary:  STIX scientific and engineering fonts, PUA glyphs
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-pua < 0.9-10
@@ -58,7 +57,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-integrals-fonts
 Summary:  STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional integral glyphs
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-integrals < 0.9-10
@@ -74,7 +72,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sizes-fonts
 Summary:  STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph sizes
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-sizes < 0.9-10
@@ -90,7 +87,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-variants-fonts
 Summary:  STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph variants
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 
 Obsoletes: %{name}-variants < 0.9-10
@@ -154,28 +150,30 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf STIXGeneral*otf
 
 %doc *.txt
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Fri Jan 16 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 0.9-11
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Fri Jan 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 0.9-10
 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 0.9-9
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 0.9-8
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 0.9-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 
-
-* Thu Nov 1 2007 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Thu Nov 1 2007 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 ??? 0.9-6
  ??? Add some fontconfig aliasing rules
 ??? 0.9-4



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090216233353.DE43070101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 19:57:03 -0000	1.6
+++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Theokritos decorative font
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -78,19 +78,22 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20070415-12
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-11
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-10
 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts????
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-7
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel sil-charis-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090216233354.9A37F70139@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/sil-charis-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	sil-charis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-charis-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000	1.1
+++ sil-charis-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.2
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 4.104
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -67,10 +67,13 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
 
 %doc *.txt *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 4.104-7
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
 * Tue Jan 27 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 4.104-6
 ??? renamed to ???sil-charis-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090216233354.21BAB70101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/google-droid-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	google-droid-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: google-droid-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- google-droid-fonts.spec	31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000	1.3
+++ google-droid-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.4
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here
 Version: 1.0.112
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:  Common files of the Droid font set
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description common
@@ -52,7 +51,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
 Summary:  A humanist sans serif typeface
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
@@ -66,7 +64,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
 Summary:  A humanist monospace sans serif typeface
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
@@ -80,7 +77,6 @@
 
 %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
 Summary:  A serif typeface
-Group:    User Interface/X
 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
@@ -138,27 +134,29 @@
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc *.txt
 
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-
 
 %changelog
-* Sat Jan 31 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.0.112-5
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sat Jan 31 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0.112-4
 ??? fix-up fontconfig installation for sans and mono
 
-* Fri Jan 16 2009 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jan 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0.112-3
 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug
 - 1.0.112-2
 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines
 ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check)
 
-* Tue Dec  9 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Tue Dec  9 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0.112-1
 ?? Licensing bit clarified in bug #472635
 ?? Fedora submission
 
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0.107-1
 ?? Initial built using ???fontpackages???
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 16 23:33:55 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.4,
	1.5
Message-ID: <20090216233355.1C39370101@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6127/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Prepare for F11 mass rebuild


Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	17 Dec 2008 20:00:45 -0000	1.4
+++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080723
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -55,23 +55,26 @@
 %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc *.pdf
-%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
-* Sun Nov 23 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20080723-4
+??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages
+
+* Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080723-3
 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages???
 
-* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080723-2
 ??? Rebuild using new rpm-font
 
-* Mon Sep 1 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Mon Sep 1 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080723-1
 ??? Upstream stealth update
 
-* Fri Jul 11 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+* Fri Jul 11 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20061120-4
 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 16 23:40:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-476720-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902162340.n1GNe9M6002889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho
                   |                            |o.co.in)




--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-16 18:40:08 EDT ---
1. your package names are broken because you're missing the -n switch to
%package as documented in the template. Since your names are broken the
auto-posts do not work

2. be careful to put the doc in the common subpackage not the main package

3. After koji's update next week-end you'll be able to drop all the
"Group:  User Interface/X" in subpackages, they'll be inherited from the main
package declaration

4. You can ignore the fontforge warning since this is nothing you can do about
short of changing the fontforge code, which is not your priority :p

Please update your package accordingly

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From goranrakic at openoffice.org  Tue Feb 17 01:44:33 2009
From: goranrakic at openoffice.org (goranrakic at openoffice.org)
Date: 17 Feb 2009 01:44:33 -0000
Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features
In-Reply-To: <iz16032@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090217014433.16866.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032


User goranrakic changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe
                        |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli
                        |vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo
                        |rafonts,haktar,hdu,hin,ior|rafonts,goranrakic,haktar,
                        |sh,jeevesbond,jlp,kami_,ma|hdu,hin,iorsh,jeevesbond,j
                        |nens,masayan,moyogo,munzir|lp,kami_,manens,masayan,mo
                        |taha,nusorn,obr,ousia,raba|yogo,munzirtaha,nusorn,obr
                        |uke,ralphie,samphan,silver|,ousia,rabauke,ralphie,sam
                        |ex,simos,utomo99'         |phan,silverex,simos,utomo9
                        |                          |9'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:21:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel
 depending on fontpackages-filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170221.n1H2LEj2031686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com         |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:20:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel
 depending on fontpackages-filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170220.n1H2KOJB031453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Rebuild against             |[fontconfig] Rebuild
                   |fontpackages-devel          |against fontpackages-devel
                   |depending on                |depending on
                   |fontpackages-filesystem     |fontpackages-filesystem




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:19:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:19:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from
 filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170219.n1H2JckA030867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please drop fonts-related   |[filesystem] Please drop
                   |directories from filesystem |fonts-related directories
                   |                            |from filesystem




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:21:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:21:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from
 filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170221.n1H2Lp7b031793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:23:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:23:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477333] [brettfont-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477333-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477333-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170223.n1H2N3pK032018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[brettfont-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:22:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:22:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170222.n1H2MTaB031970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[asana-math-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:25:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:25:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170225.n1H2PemC032513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[freefont] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:26:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:26:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170226.n1H2QpnI032419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[cave9] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:26:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:26:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477368] [a2ps] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170226.n1H2QRUG032365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[a2ps] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:25:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:25:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477334-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477334-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170225.n1H2P6kP032119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[darkgarden-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:27:56 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:27:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170227.n1H2Rup6000352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[culmus-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:31:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:31:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477385-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477385-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170231.n1H2VNxs001029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[fillets-ng-data] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:29:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477382] [enscript] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477382-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477382-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2TssY000501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[enscript] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:29:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2T4UN000427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[denemo] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:30:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:30:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170230.n1H2UbgA000684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[extremetuxracer] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:27:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:27:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477372-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477372-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170227.n1H2RVip032537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[childsplay] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:31:55 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:31:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477386] [flumotion] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477386-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477386-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170231.n1H2VtDw000787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[flumotion] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:29:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:29:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477378] [e16-themes] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477378-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477378-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170229.n1H2TWbT032636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[e16-themes] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:34:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:34:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477393] [GraphicsMagick] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477393-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477393-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170234.n1H2YS4i001391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[GraphicsMagick] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:33:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:33:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477389-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477389-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170233.n1H2XWAS001293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[ghostscript-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:32:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:32:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477387-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477387-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170232.n1H2WW6B001189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:35:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170235.n1H2Zj6I001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[hanazono-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:33:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:33:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477390] [glob2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477390-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477390-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170233.n1H2XvnP000957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[glob2] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:36:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477398] [icelandic-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477398-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477398-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170236.n1H2aKP2001572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[icelandic-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:36:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170236.n1H2af8v001612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[inconsolata-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:35:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477394] [groff] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477394-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477394-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170235.n1H2ZBmI001319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[groff] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:38:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:38:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170238.n1H2c57n002134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[k3d] Please convert to new
                   |packaging guidelines        |font packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:41:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170241.n1H2f7lp002797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|kdelibs: Please convert to  |[koffice] Please convert to
                   |new font packaging          |new font packaging
                   |guidelines                  |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:41:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:41:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477408] [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477408-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477408-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170241.n1H2fscB002552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[khmeros-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:38:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:38:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477405-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477405-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170238.n1H2cmwP001855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[kacst-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:37:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:37:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477403-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477403-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170237.n1H2bPDf001726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[jomolhari-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:45:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:45:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477413] [liblo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477413-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477413-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170245.n1H2jk5c003648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[liblo] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:44:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:44:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477411-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477411-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170244.n1H2iGmB003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[libeXosip2] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:46:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:46:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477416-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477416-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170246.n1H2kkr8003531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[lilypond] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:43:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170243.n1H2heu4002788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com




--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 21:43:39 EDT ---
bug 477407 was moved from kdelibs to koffice - maybe it should be closed as a
duplicate of this now?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:47:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477419-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477419-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170247.n1H2lwtM004103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[lklug-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:50:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:50:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477426-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477426-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170250.n1H2oRlg004741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[monafont] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:49:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:49:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477422] [mapserver] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477422-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477422-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170249.n1H2n8Jc004269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[mapserver] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:51:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477429-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477429-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170251.n1H2p1JR004826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[myanmar3-unicode-fonts]
                   |packaging guidelines        |Please convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:48:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:48:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170248.n1H2maD2003803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[madan-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:49:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:49:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170249.n1H2nop5003967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[meanwhile] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:51:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477431] [nethack-vultures] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477431-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477431-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170251.n1H2pX7j004569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[nethack-vultures] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:47:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170247.n1H2lNuR003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[linux-libertine-fonts]
                   |packaging guidelines        |Please convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:52:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2q4NP005272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[padauk-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:55:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:55:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477443] [poker3d-data] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170255.n1H2tjbJ005952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[poker3d-data] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:52:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477437-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477437-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2qSR9005330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[paktype-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:56:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:56:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170256.n1H2uWFe006134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[python-matplotlib] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:56:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:56:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477444-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477444-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170256.n1H2u7n8005573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[pygame] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:52:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:52:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477439] [pgfouine] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477439-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477439-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170252.n1H2qvfU004753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[pgfouine] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:55:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:55:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477442] [poker2d] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477442-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477442-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170255.n1H2t8cT005317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[poker2d] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:59:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:59:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170259.n1H2xioE006538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[sazanami-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:00:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:00:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477459] [sportrop-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170300.n1H30EJq006895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[sportrop-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:57:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477446] [python-reportlab] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2v4mF006307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[python-reportlab] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:57:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477449] [roadstencil-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2vwY8006376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[roadstencil-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:01:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:01:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477464] [TeXmacs] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477464-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477464-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170301.n1H310N9006587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[TeXmacs] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:58:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:58:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170258.n1H2wYjJ005898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[rosegarden4] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:00:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:00:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477463] [texlive-texmf] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477463-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477463-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170300.n1H30acF006524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[texlive-texmf] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 02:57:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:57:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170257.n1H2vVr7005783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[python-tgcaptcha] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:01:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:01:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477466-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477466-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170301.n1H31Yxk006760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[thibault-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:03:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:03:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170303.n1H33fpi007529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[tvtime] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:05:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:05:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170305.n1H35RQQ007975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[unikurd-web-font] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:06:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:06:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477477] [urw-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170306.n1H36iCe007807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[urw-fonts] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:04:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477474-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477474-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34PAK007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |446451
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[un-core-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:03:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:03:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170303.n1H333Q9007055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[tuxtype2] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:02:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170302.n1H32brJ007009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[tuxpaint] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:04:55 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477475-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477475-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170304.n1H34t7S007234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[un-extra-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:02:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170302.n1H328oN006910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |petersen at redhat.com
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[tibetan-machine-uni-fonts]
                   |packaging guidelines        |Please convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:08:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:08:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477487] [xpilot-ng] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477487-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477487-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170308.n1H38abB008395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[xpilot-ng] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:07:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:07:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170307.n1H37CaC008256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[wastesedge] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:07:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:07:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477483] [widelands] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477483-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477483-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170307.n1H37bDA008309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[widelands] Please convert
                   |packaging guidelines        |to new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:09:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477488-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477488-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170309.n1H394tV008134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[xplanet] Please convert to
                   |packaging guidelines        |new font packaging
                   |                            |guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:08:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:08:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477486] [xorg-x11-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477486-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477486-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170308.n1H38CXA008034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Please convert to new font  |[xorg-x11-fonts] Please
                   |packaging guidelines        |convert to new font
                   |                            |packaging guidelines




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:27:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:27:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485857] New: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation
 fonts
Message-ID: <bug-485857-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation fonts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857

           Summary: Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation
                    fonts
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: tinh911 at yahoo.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Created an attachment (id=332166)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332166)
Vietnamese Unicode characters

The Liberation fonts are missing the Vietnamese Unicode characters. I am not a
typography geek so I don't know which group those characters belong to.
I attached a file to show all the unicode characters of Vietnamese in normal
case and uppercase, I use Arial font for this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 03:43:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:43:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170343.n1H3hmNp015705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 22:43:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> I have only built on rawhide. Let me backport that.

May be better to test first on f10.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 04:05:26 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:05:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170405.n1H45QGw019627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 23:05:25 EDT ---
Behdad, could you please update on this important issue?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 04:11:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4BDhG020737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(dwayne at translate.
                   |                            |org.za)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 04:11:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170411.n1H4B0ni020565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 04:13:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:13:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170413.n1H4DHPc021068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472





--- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-16 23:13:16 EDT ---
Hi Dwayne, is that still reproducible?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 05:34:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:34:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170534.n1H5YYp3000888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472


Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(dwayne at translate. |
                   |org.za)                     |




--- Comment #3 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-17 00:34:33 EDT ---
# confirmed that cjkunifonts-uming is not installed
rpm -qa | grep cjk

# confirmed fontforge works
fontforge

# Install default fonts - only cjkunifonts-uming missing and installed
yum groupinstall Fonts

# Check fontforge
fontforge

Results:
Still broken...

Error message:
I'll past it as a comment

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 05:41:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:41:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170541.n1H5fZsD002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472





--- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-17 00:41:34 EDT ---
Just for clarity...

yum installed the following:

Installing:
 cjkunifonts-uming     noarch     0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10      updates      10 M


And the Fontforge version was:

[heather at localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fontforge
fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 05:38:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:38:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170538.n1H5cG7B001807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472





--- Comment #4 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2009-02-17 00:38:15 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=332176)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332176)
Error output from fontforge run

fontforge > errors.log 2>&1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 06:19:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:19:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485472] cjkunifonts-uming breaks fontforge
In-Reply-To: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170619.n1H6JLpB008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485472


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 07:58:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:58:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170758.n1H7wnf4025419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-02-17 02:58:48 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=332188)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332188)
screenshot with new fontconfig

And screenshot with new fontconfig fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11
Japanese font glyphs are not used.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 07:57:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:57:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170757.n1H7vWCh025270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-02-17 02:57:31 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=332187)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332187)
screenshot with old fontconfig

(In reply to comment #34)
> fontconfig-2.6.97-3.g945d6a4.fc11 again reproduces this problem......

To clarify this, screenshot again.
This one with (the old) fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11.i386 .
Looks fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 08:19:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:19:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902170819.n1H8J3U8028713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 03:19:03 EDT ---
Yes, I see un-core-fonts being used on the ja desktop - I will try to get the
fontconfig files there updated soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 10:59:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477408] [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477408-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477408-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxEBY031193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408


Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 10:59:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477427-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477427-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxGXh031244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427


Bug 477427 depends on bug 477408, which changed state.

Bug 477408 Summary: [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 10:59:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:59:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171059.n1HAxFUs031218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477408, which changed state.

Bug 477408 Summary: [khmeros-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 10:58:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:58:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171058.n1HAwrgw030988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476


Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 10:58:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:58:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171058.n1HAwshq031012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477476, which changed state.

Bug 477476 Summary: [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 12:06:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:06:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171206.n1HC6MlQ013962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371





--- Comment #14 from Victor Bogado <bogado at bogado.net>  2009-02-17 07:06:20 EDT ---
I'm sorry for taking so long, my personal life is a little messed up right now,
but I will do this as soon as I can manage it. I use stock F10, never ventured
into Rawhide, so how do I do this, can I install it on my system or should I
install a entirely new rawhide system?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 15:22:19 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:22:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1,
	NONE VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf, 1.2,
	NONE VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf, 1.2,
	NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.18, NONE sources, 1.13, NONE
Message-ID: <20090217152219.99E297012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25068

Added Files:
	dead.package 
Removed Files:
	Makefile VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf 
	VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf VLGothic-fonts.spec 
	sources 
Log Message:
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- Makefile DELETED ---


--- VLGothic-fontconfig-monospace.conf DELETED ---


--- VLGothic-fontconfig-proportional.conf DELETED ---


--- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED ---


--- sources DELETED ---



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 15:23:04 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-10 dead.package, NONE,
	1.1 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf, 1.2,
	NONE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1,
	NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.16, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE sources,
	1.12, NONE
Message-ID: <20090217152304.8381B7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25230

Added Files:
	dead.package 
Removed Files:
	59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf 
	Makefile VLGothic-fonts.spec branch sources 
Log Message:
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf DELETED ---


--- 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf DELETED ---


--- Makefile DELETED ---


--- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED ---


--- branch DELETED ---


--- sources DELETED ---



From tagoh at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 15:23:51 2009
From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9 dead.package, NONE,
	1.1 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf, 1.2,
	NONE 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1,
	NONE VLGothic-fonts.spec, 1.13, NONE branch, 1.1, NONE sources,
	1.9, NONE
Message-ID: <20090217152351.32E1A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: tagoh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25437

Added Files:
	dead.package 
Removed Files:
	59-VLGothic-monospace.conf 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf 
	Makefile VLGothic-fonts.spec branch sources 
Log Message:
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
This package has renamed to vlgothic-fonts.


--- 59-VLGothic-monospace.conf DELETED ---


--- 59-VLGothic-proportional.conf DELETED ---


--- Makefile DELETED ---


--- VLGothic-fonts.spec DELETED ---


--- branch DELETED ---


--- sources DELETED ---



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:03:13 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec,1.12,1.13
Message-ID: <20090217190313.1D5917012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20313/fontpackages/devel

Modified Files:
	fontpackages.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- fontpackages.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.12
+++ fontpackages.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:02:42 -0000	1.13
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
-%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
-%define rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
+%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
+%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
+%global rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
 Version: 1.19



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190949.A4E2A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:17 -0000	1.3
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname apanov-edrip
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname apanov-edrip
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename edrip-src-%{version}
+%global archivename edrip-src-%{version}
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081007



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.4,
	1.5
Message-ID: <20090217190949.C6B1870136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.4
+++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.5
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname apanov-heuristica
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname apanov-heuristica
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename heuristica-src-%{version}
+%global archivename heuristica-src-%{version}
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20090125



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190950.A826570136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-ambrosia
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-ambrosia
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_AMBROSIA
+%global archivename GFS_AMBROSIA
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080624



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.13,
	1.14
Message-ID: <20090217190950.050887012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.13
+++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.14
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname    bitstream-vera
-%define archivename ttf-bitstream-vera
+%global fontname    bitstream-vera
+%global archivename ttf-bitstream-vera
 
-%define common_desc \
+%global common_desc \
 The Vera fonts are high-quality Latin fonts donated by Bitstream. \
 These fonts have been released under a liberal license, see the  \
 licensing FAQ in COPYRIGHT.TXT or the online up-to-date version \



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190950.746297012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/ecolier-court-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	ecolier-court-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ecolier-court-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.7
+++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname ecolier-court
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}
+%global fontname ecolier-court
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}
 
-%define common_desc\
+%global common_desc\
 ??colier court fonts were created by Jean-Marie Douteau to mimic the \
 traditional cursive writing French children are taught in school. \
 \



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,
	1.8, 1.9
Message-ID: <20090217190951.4F2637012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-bodoni-classic
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-bodoni-classic
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_BODONICLASS_OT
+%global archivename GFS_BODONICLASS_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10
Message-ID: <20090217190950.E0D187012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-artemisia
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-artemisia
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_ARTEMISIA_OT
+%global archivename GFS_ARTEMISIA_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec,1.96,1.97
Message-ID: <20090217190950.3910A70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/dejavu-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.96
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -r1.96 -r1.97
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:18 -0000	1.96
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.97
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-%define fontname    dejavu
-%define archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion}
+%global fontname    dejavu
+%global archivename %{name}-%{archiveversion}
 
-#define alphatag .20080512svn2226
-#define alphatag .rc1
+#global alphatag .20080512svn2226
+#global alphatag .rc1
 
-#define archiveversion 2.24-20080512-2226
-%define archiveversion %{version}
+#global archiveversion 2.24-20080512-2226
+%global archiveversion %{version}
 
 # Let the perl maintainer worry about Unicode.org data files
-%define Blocks      %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt
-%define UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt
+%global Blocks      %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/Blocks.txt
+%global UnicodeData %(eval "$(%{__perl} -V:privlibexp)"; echo $privlibexp)/unicore/UnicodeData.txt
 
 # Common description
-%define common_desc \
+%global common_desc \
 The DejaVu font set is based on the ???Bitstream Vera??? fonts, release 1.10. Its\
 purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \
 original style, using an open collaborative development process.
 
 # Compat description
-%define compat_desc \
+%global compat_desc \
 This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\
 package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\
 do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090217190951.89D9E7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-bodoni
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-bodoni
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_BODONI_OT
+%global archivename GFS_BODONI_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.9,
	1.10
Message-ID: <20090217190951.1980C70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:19 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-baskerville
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-baskerville
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_BASKERVILLE_OT
+%global archivename GFS_BASKERVILLE_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070327



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.8,
	1.9
Message-ID: <20090217190951.F2BCB7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-didot-classic
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-didot-classic
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT
+%global archivename GFS_DIDOTCLASS_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080702



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190951.C298E70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:20 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-complutum
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-complutum
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_COMPLUTUM_OT
+%global archivename GFS_COMPLUTUM_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070413



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190952.9945B7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-fleischman
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-fleischman
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_FLEISCHMAN
+%global archivename GFS_FLEISCHMAN
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190952.37DE77012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-didot-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-didot-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-didot
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-didot
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_DIDOT_OT
+%global archivename GFS_DIDOT_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070616



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190952.69E4B70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-eustace
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-eustace
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename  GFS_EUSTACE
+%global archivename  GFS_EUSTACE
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.7,
	1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190953.8D2F370143@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-neohellenic
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-neohellenic
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT
+%global archivename GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090217190953.1749670136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-gazis
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-gazis
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_GAZIS
+%global archivename GFS_GAZIS
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080318



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190952.D13DA7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:21 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-garaldus
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-garaldus
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_GARALDUS
+%global archivename GFS_GARALDUS
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080707



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190953.5860F7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-jackson
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-jackson
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_JACKSON
+%global archivename GFS_JACKSON
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090217190954.CF2BE7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/google-droid-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	google-droid-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: google-droid-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- google-droid-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.4
+++ google-droid-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.5
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define fontname google-droid
+%global fontname google-droid
 
-%define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts
+%global download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts
 
-%define common_desc \
+%global common_desc \
 The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender's \
 Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \
 for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190954.638F770145@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-solomos
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-solomos
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_SOLOMOS_OT
+%global archivename GFS_SOLOMOS_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20071114



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190953.F423C70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-olga-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-olga-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-olga-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-olga
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-olga
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_OLGA_OT
+%global archivename GFS_OLGA_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel sil-andika-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090217190955.5439D7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/sil-andika-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	sil-andika-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: sil-andika-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sil-andika-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sil-andika-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.2
+++ sil-andika-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-%define fontname sil-andika
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname sil-andika
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
 # Someday SIL will release sanely named archives
-%define archivename AndikaBasicR_10
+%global archivename AndikaBasicR_10
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.0



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:53 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090217190953.BEAF67012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:22 -0000	1.3
+++ gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-nicefore
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-nicefore
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_NICEFORE
+%global archivename GFS_NICEFORE
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190954.9846570146@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-theokritos
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-theokritos
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_THEOKRITOS_OT
+%global archivename GFS_THEOKRITOS_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel sil-charis-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090217190955.8DE6870136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/sil-charis-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	sil-charis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sil-charis-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.2
+++ sil-charis-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname sil-charis
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname sil-charis
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename CharisSIL
+%global archivename CharisSIL
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 4.104



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:55 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel stix-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190955.CDD387012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/stix-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	stix-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: stix-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- stix-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.7
+++ stix-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%define fontname stix
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}
+%global fontname stix
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}
 
-%define archivename STIXBeta
+%global archivename STIXBeta
 
-%define common_desc \
+%global common_desc \
 The mission of the Scientific and Technical Information Exchange (STIX) font \
 creation project is the preparation of a comprehensive set of fonts that serve \
 the scientific and engineering community in the process from manuscript \



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8
Message-ID: <20090217190954.302CB70144@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/gfs-porson-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-porson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- gfs-porson-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:23 -0000	1.7
+++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname gfs-porson
-%define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname gfs-porson
+%global fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename GFS_Porson_OT
+%global archivename GFS_Porson_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:56 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.5,
	1.6
Message-ID: <20090217190956.5491970136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel

Modified Files:
	yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:33:24 -0000	1.5
+++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:26 -0000	1.6
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-%define fontname yanone-kaffeesatz
-%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontname yanone-kaffeesatz
+%global fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
 
-%define archivename YanoneKaffeesatz
+%global archivename YanoneKaffeesatz
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080723



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 17 19:09:56 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel xgridfit.spec,1.9,1.10
Message-ID: <20090217190956.140767012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20630/xgridfit/devel

Modified Files:
	xgridfit.spec 
Log Message:
switch to global


Index: xgridfit.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- xgridfit.spec	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.9
+++ xgridfit.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.10
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-%define archivever 1-17a
+%global archivever 1-17a
 
 Name:    xgridfit
 Version: 1.17



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 19:24:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171924.n1HJOiYJ007056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-17 14:24:44 EDT ---
Oh, is that all? ;)  I'll get started.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 19:24:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171924.n1HJOZ55002319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-17 14:24:34 EDT ---
Oh, is that all? ;)  I'll get started.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 19:23:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:23:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171923.n1HJNnK1002105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 14:23:48 EDT ---
Add the font bug list in CC so we don't miss issue updates again

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 19:48:56 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:48:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171948.n1HJmuNL009035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 14:48:55 EDT ---
Ok, my bad for not being crystal-clear. & is one of the few reserved characters
in XML, you can't use it as-is. I'd say replace it with &#38;

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-predefined-ent


Also, while I'm at it

1. next week the new koji will allow srpm building with rawhide rpm, and
rawhide rpm has support for group inheritance, so you can drop all the
Group:  User Interface/X
from subpackages

2. for some reason upstream decided is was smart to add GPL&GNU to the font
names this release. So for interoperability reasons with other distros and
documents that use the old font names, it's better to use the substitution
template to alias the old names
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf

(at least for the fonts in the "old pack" at
http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/Old_BPG_GPL_GNU_Fonts.zip )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 19:55:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:55:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902171955.n1HJt7FX015814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371





--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 14:55:06 EDT ---
np, I know what messed up means :(

You can do scratch builds in koji, for dist-f11, they'll use the new
fontpackages. If you don't have access to a rawhide system, just look at the
templates in the last bz2 archive on
http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/fontpackages/

you don't need to actually install it to check the txt template files :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 20:01:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:01:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172001.n1HK1Pas012511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 15:01:24 EDT ---
1. Well, that's nice, but I'll be building these fonts for older releases as
well, so I'll keep them. It doesn't hurt.

2. Okay, fixed, along with the &#38 replacement across the board.

New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-3.fc11.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 20:35:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:35:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172035.n1HKZA4J021449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mcepl at redhat.com




--- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 15:35:09 EDT ---
While at it -- couldn't you reconsider dependency solely on bitstream-vera
fonts? Why would deja fonts (default in Fedora and based on bistream-vera) are
not enough?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 20:47:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:47:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172047.n1HKl3FH024514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450





--- Comment #4 from Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de>  2009-02-17 15:47:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> While at it -- couldn't you reconsider dependency solely on bitstream-vera
> fonts? Why would deja fonts (default in Fedora and based on bistream-vera) are
> not enough?

I am lost what I have to do with the font dependencies. The wiki has too much
information and I have no clue. It just needs some font and I do not care which
one. So if you know what needs to be changed in the spec file... You are
welcome to do the necessary changes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 21:54:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172154.n1HLs46M006471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450





--- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 16:54:03 EDT ---
[matej at viklef coreutils]$ rpm -qR fbida |grep fonts
bitstream-vera-fonts  
[matej at viklef coreutils]$ 

I am just hijacking this bug -- it has absolutely nothing to do with this bug
as such. I am just complaining that fbida (uselessly, IMHO) brings to my
computer bitstream-vera-fonts, which are identical to deja fonts except only
for ISO 8859-1 (deja fonts work well for all languages of the world).

I will take a look at the spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 22:11:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:11:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172211.n1HMB6Ct016476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 17:11:05 EDT ---
missing the trailing ";", an SGML/XML entity has the "&something;" format

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 22:16:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:16:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172216.n1HMGbc4017664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 17:16:36 EDT ---
Argh. Fixed.

New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-4.fc11.src.rpm
New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 22:40:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:40:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172240.n1HMep8i016641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 17:40:50 EDT ---
Very fine work on a non-trivial package. I don't see any obvious problem now.

??? APPROVED ???

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 22:42:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172242.n1HMg8vj016827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-17 17:42:07 EDT ---
You can now continue from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

as usual

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 17 22:59:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:59:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902172259.n1HMxp2O024593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450





--- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-17 17:59:50 EDT ---
Actually my issue seems to be fixed in Rawhide (not in F10, why?)

Concerning the naming of the fonts -- what font exactly you need? From looking
at the package itself, I don't see any hard requirements. So then
dejavu-sans-mono-fonts (I think same FAQ says that it should be Monospace)
should fit the bill perfectly, right?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 06:02:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:02:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477458-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902180602.n1I62Np9002773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458





--- Comment #12 from Rajeesh <rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com>  2009-02-18 01:02:22 EDT ---
Thanks, I just wanted to have a confirmation :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 08:50:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:50:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902180850.n1I8oSDN026206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
                   |                            |,
                   |                            |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor
                   |                            |ge.net, tagoh at redhat.com
          Component|Package Review              |vlgothic-fonts
         AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com            |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor
                   |                            |ge.net




--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 03:50:27 EDT ---
Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at
search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and
submit-bug page.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 09:42:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:42:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10
In-Reply-To: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902180942.n1I9gxf3005068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|terminus-font-x11 unusable  |terminus-font-x11 partially
                   |on F-10                     |unusable on F-10




--- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 04:42:58 EDT ---
The Gnome terminal (using the new and slow font rendering magic) can use
terminus.

emacs and xterm (apparently using the old and quick font rendering magic)
cannot.

This gives a better idea as to where to look.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 09:54:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:54:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902180954.n1I9sBJO012717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481





--- Comment #12 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at no-log.org>  2009-02-18 04:54:09 EDT ---
I'm wondering something: I remove the font at %prep time, which means it is
still included in the srpm right ?

Is that a potential legal issue ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 13:15:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:15:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 444281] Provides: freetype2-devel
In-Reply-To: <bug-444281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-444281-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181315.n1IDFDF6025373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281





--- Comment #2 from Ed Avis <ed at membled.com>  2009-02-18 08:15:12 EDT ---
This is still the case in Fedora 10.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 15:08:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:08:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181508.n1IF8DAt014668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481





--- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 10:08:12 EDT ---
Yep. You need to make a modified tarball that doesn't have that font.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ajax at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 18 19:11:27 2009
From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 import.log, 1.1,
	1.2 libXfont.spec, 1.42, 1.43 sources, 1.17,
	1.18 libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch, 1.1,
	NONE libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch, 1.1,
	NONE libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090218191127.65332700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ajax

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19423/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore import.log libXfont.spec sources 
Removed Files:
	libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch 
	libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch 
	libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch 
Log Message:
libXfont 1.4.0



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- .cvsignore	28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000	1.16
+++ .cvsignore	18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000	1.17
@@ -1 +1 @@
-libXfont-1.3.3.tar.bz2
+libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 libXfont-1_3_3-1_fc10:HEAD:libXfont-1.3.3-1.fc10.src.rpm:1219949211
+libXfont-1_4_0-1_fc11:HEAD:libXfont-1.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234984215


Index: libXfont.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
--- libXfont.spec	28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000	1.42
+++ libXfont.spec	18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000	1.43
@@ -1,17 +1,13 @@
 Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library
 Name: libXfont
-Version: 1.3.3
+Version: 1.4.0
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.x.org
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
-Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
-
-Patch1: libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch
-Patch2: libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch
-Patch3: libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch
+Source0: http://www.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
 
 BuildRequires: xorg-x11-util-macros
 BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel
@@ -41,12 +37,9 @@
 
 %prep
 %setup -q
-%patch1 -p1 -b .visibility
-%patch2 -p1 -b .retry
-%patch3 -p1 -b .no-fc
 
 %build
-autoreconf -v --install || exit 1
+export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Os"
 %configure --disable-static
 make %{?_smp_mflags}  
 
@@ -85,7 +78,6 @@
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontconf.h
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontencc.h
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontmisc.h
-%{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontmod.h
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontshow.h
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontutil.h
 %{_includedir}/X11/fonts/fontxlfd.h


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18
--- sources	28 Aug 2008 18:47:05 -0000	1.17
+++ sources	18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000	1.18
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4f174b9613f87cf00d731da428a1b194  libXfont-1.3.3.tar.bz2
+3a8e06b25912ef339d70a8ba003da9b5  libXfont-1.4.0.tar.bz2


--- libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch DELETED ---


--- libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch DELETED ---


--- libXfont-1.3.3-no-fontcache.patch DELETED ---



From ajax at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 18 19:21:57 2009
From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel libXfont.spec,1.43,1.44
Message-ID: <20090218192157.CD2FF700F7@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ajax

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23809

Modified Files:
	libXfont.spec 
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 18 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 1.4.0-2
- libXfont 1.4.0



Index: libXfont.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44
--- libXfont.spec	18 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0000	1.43
+++ libXfont.spec	18 Feb 2009 19:21:27 -0000	1.44
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library
 Name: libXfont
 Version: 1.4.0
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.x.org
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xfont.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 18 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 1.4.0-2
+- libXfont 1.4.0
+
 * Thu Aug 28 2008 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 1.3.3-1
 - libXfont 1.3.3.
 - libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch: Retry font server connections faster.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477368] [a2ps] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVrlt012677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368





--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:52 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:56 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477372-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477372-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVupf012757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:55 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477371-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVsrL012707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371





--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:53 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVpvw012619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:50 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from
 filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVh6W012477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:41 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVxak012819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:58 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477333] [brettfont-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477333-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477333-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVmsT012541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:47 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVlsL012523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:45 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVwTB012792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:57 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477334-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477334-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVnPW012580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334





--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:48 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:31:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:31:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel
 depending on fontpackages-filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477054-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181931.n1IJVjca012502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054





--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:31:44 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXHZV014630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:16 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480455-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480455-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXLDs014702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480454-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480454-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXKIx014684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:20 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480469-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480469-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXTt3014861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:29 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480457-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480457-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXMVd014717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXJDP014663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480461-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480461-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXPF9014767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:24 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXVF1014914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXOoV014743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:23 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXGO9014595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:15 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWIgw013386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXDaS014546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:12 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:26 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480462-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480462-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXQVi014789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:26 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXEqk014565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:13 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477413] [liblo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477413-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477413-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWPMY013542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:24 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477394] [groff] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477394-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477394-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWCD4013276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:11 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:54 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:54 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477464] [TeXmacs] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477464-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477464-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWsiq014146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:54 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481423] [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-481423-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481423-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXZ48014968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:35 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWwYs014253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:57 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477390] [glob2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477390-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477390-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWA0o013238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477382] [enscript] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477382-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477382-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW29v012904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:01 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477439] [pgfouine] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477439-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477439-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWg2X013880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:42 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXCLf014513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443





--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:11 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480470-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480470-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXUHV014882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:30 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXRV2014814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:27 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477487] [xpilot-ng] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477487-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477487-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX9ql014473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:09 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477477] [urw-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX5TT014383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:04 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477472] [tuxtype2] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477472-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWxWb014276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:59 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480452-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480452-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXItj014648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477444-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477444-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWjBK013940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:45 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477483] [widelands] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477483-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477483-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX8ef014431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:07 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWZ7S013742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:34 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXWr9014926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWpbv014069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:50 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXFIe014582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:14 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:43 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477442] [poker2d] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477442-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477442-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWhmu013899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:43 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477386] [flumotion] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477386-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477386-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW6Pb013075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:06 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477473-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX1aw014299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:00 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480468-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480468-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXS3e014830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:28 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXYGu014945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:32 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477378] [e16-themes] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477378-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477378-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW19B012854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:00 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477405-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477405-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWJP1013407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477419-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477419-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWTTi013631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:29 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWVs1013670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:30 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477463] [texlive-texmf] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477463-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477463-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWr5i014125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:53 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477443] [poker3d-data] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWiOc013917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:44 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477474-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477474-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX2ZP014320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:01 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477393] [GraphicsMagick] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477393-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477393-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWBHs013257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477481-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX68B014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:05 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWeVa013837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:39 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477475-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477475-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX30V014349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:02 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477403-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477403-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWHao013352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:16 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477423-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477423-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWYQU013724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:33 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477459] [sportrop-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWrEa014110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:52 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWMtN013487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:21 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWFp5013335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:14 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWLxx013450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:19 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477437-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477437-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWfeb013858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:41 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:52 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWqJ3014088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:51 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW3an012976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:02 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:48 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:48 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWmL0014019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:48 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477398] [icelandic-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477398-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477398-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWEpL013317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:13 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477411-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477411-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWOlL013520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:23 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477389-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477389-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW9Tl013214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:09 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477416-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477416-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWRgp013563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416





--- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:25 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477486] [xorg-x11-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477486-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477486-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJX92M014456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:08 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWDf6013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:12 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477446] [python-reportlab] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWlHk014000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:47 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWkXs013978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:46 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477449] [roadstencil-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477449-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWogf014052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:49 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477488-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477488-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXBAL014491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:10 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477422] [mapserver] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477422-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477422-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWXue013699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422





--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:32 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:36 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:36 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477426-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477426-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWaWn013757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426





--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:35 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:56 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477466-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477466-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWuDr014170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466





--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:55 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477387-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477387-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW8hm013148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:07 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477431] [nethack-vultures] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477431-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477431-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWd2u013819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:38 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477429-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477429-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWcne013797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:37 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477385-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477385-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJW5Tj013025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385





--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:04 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWvHS014195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:56 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:32:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:32:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477418-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181932.n1IJWSZg013597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:32:27 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:33:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?=
 =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?=
In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481494-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXb1m014999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-18 14:33:36 EDT ---
This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about
adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before
Fedora 11 beta:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule

A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the
build farm:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild

As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes
during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the
last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before
the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages.

The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using
packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite
possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font
autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation

We don't want that

There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have
likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more
work for the support team by asking questions answered there.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:53:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477409-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrElB022397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409





--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>  2009-02-18 14:53:12 EDT ---
*** Bug 477407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:53:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrGfO022427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477407, which changed state.

Bug 477407 Summary: [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 19:53:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477407-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrDk9022359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407


Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>  2009-02-18 14:53:12 EDT ---
let's close this one, and track any stragglers in bug #477409

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477409 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 20:29:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182029.n1IKTEY4031770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042





--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT ---
Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ?
You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components. 

I see the lowercase one here in that list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 22:10:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:10:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486221] New: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing
 macro %{fontdir}
Message-ID: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir}

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221

           Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro
                    %{fontdir}
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: fontpackages
        AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
        ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

  $ grep fontdir /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec
  [...]
  %dir %{fontdir}

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

  fontpackages-devel-1.15-1.fc10.noarch

How reproducible:

  100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install fontpackages-devel

Actual results:

  uses non-existing %{fontdir}

Expected results:

  uses existing %{_fontdir}

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 22:20:32 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:20:32 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182220.n1IMKWNq026328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477





--- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? <ville.skytta at iki.fi>  2009-02-18 17:20:31 EDT ---
Nicolas, this bug is assigned to you, see comment 2 and comment 4.  Do you
intend to take care of it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 22:56:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?=
 =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?=
In-Reply-To: <bug-481494-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481494-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuEGS002028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494


Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 22:56:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477476-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuGqr002093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476


Bug 477476 depends on bug 481494, which changed state.

Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 22:56:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuFcE002068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 481494, which changed state.

Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 18 23:13:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:13:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902182313.n1INDYCB006326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374





--- Comment #8 from Oron Peled <oron at actcom.co.il>  2009-02-18 18:13:33 EDT ---
 * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator]
 * Historically the Culmus project distributed its fonts as:
   - Culmus (the regular fonts you just re-packaged)
   - Culmus fancy fonts. Extra free fonts. They are currently
     still packaged as: fonts-hebrew-fancy-0.20051122-4.fc10.noarch
   - Lately they added a third category -- Ancient fonts (for ancient
     Semitic scripts).
   All these are linked from: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/
   [it's a bit confusing as the normal "Download" links of sourceforge
    only lead you to the "regular" Culmus fonts]

 * Some of the fancy fonts are unique. E.g: the "Ktav-Yad" is the only
   free "hand-writing" font in Hebrew.

 * As for naming:
   - For consistency to end users, i think the fonts in the "fancy"
     category should be named just like the other Culmus fonts.
     Example: culmus-ktav-yad-fonts
     and not: culmus-fancy-ktav-yad-fonts.
     [the split to "fancy" was done for economy (bandwidth) reasons
      not really functional ones].

   - Of course we can group the "fancy" ones via a meta-package that
     requires each of them. But I don't think it worth the trouble
     and it may confuse people to think it's yet another font from
     this collection.

   - We can add the "Ancient" ones in this go (if you have time for this)
     But IMO their name should contain "ancient", as they actually
     represent different scripts). E.g:
        culmus-ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts
     What? this is getting too much. Maybe settle for:
        ancient-hebrew-paleo-gezer-fonts

 * For any help/rants etc., just mail me (on
   http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/he
   you can see my email as my bugzilla account.

Thanks,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 00:50:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190050.n1J0ojxB028714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |486248




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 00:50:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190050.n1J0oi2r028681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com
             Blocks|                            |477044




--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 19:50:44 EDT ---
This review request is for renaming the old terminus-font package according to
the new font policies (bug 480482).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ndim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 19 00:56:14 2009
From: ndim at fedoraproject.org (Hans Ulrich Niedermann)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:56:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/terminus-font/F-10 terminus-font.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090219005614.E1D7B700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ndim

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8791

Modified Files:
	terminus-font.spec 
Log Message:
* Thu Feb 19 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun at n-dimensional.de> - 4.28-1.fc10.1
- generate fonts.dir at build time (bug 483589)



Index: terminus-font.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/F-10/terminus-font.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- terminus-font.spec	7 Dec 2008 12:54:05 -0000	1.8
+++ terminus-font.spec	19 Feb 2009 00:55:44 -0000	1.9
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:           terminus-font
 Version:        4.28
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        1%{?dist}.1
 Summary:        Clean fixed width font
 BuildArch:      noarch
 
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
 BuildRequires:  /usr/bin/bdftopcf
+BuildRequires:  /usr/bin/mkfontdir
 
 
 # This directory is owned by the fontconfig package.
@@ -120,20 +121,18 @@
 
 # Fedora specific docs and examples
 mkdir -p docs/console docs/x11
-%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE10}" docs/console/README.fedora
-%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE20}" docs/x11/README.fedora
-%{__cp} -p "%{SOURCE21}" docs/x11/Xresources.example
+cp -p "%{SOURCE10}" docs/console/README.fedora
+cp -p "%{SOURCE20}" docs/x11/README.fedora
+cp -p "%{SOURCE21}" docs/x11/Xresources.example
 
 
 %install
 %{__rm} -rf "%{buildroot}"
 %{__make} DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" TESTDIR= install install-ref
-# Create %%ghost files (to simulate files created by mkfontdir)
-(cd "%{buildroot}%{local_x11_font_dir}" && \
-    touch fonts.dir fonts.scale fonts.alias encodings.dir)
 # Install catalogue symlink
 %{__mkdir_p} "%{buildroot}%{catalogue}"
 %{__ln_s} -f "%{local_x11_font_dir}" "%{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}:unscaled"
+/usr/bin/mkfontdir "%{buildroot}%{local_x11_font_dir}"
 
 
 %clean
@@ -145,11 +144,8 @@
 %doc README README-BG
 %doc docs/x11/README.fedora docs/x11/Xresources.example
 %dir %{local_x11_font_dir}
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.scale
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.alias
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{local_x11_font_dir}/encodings.dir
 %{catalogue}/%{name}:unscaled
+%{local_x11_font_dir}/fonts.dir
 %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-520n.pcf.gz
 %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-g14b.pcf.gz
 %{local_x11_font_dir}/ter-x32n.pcf.gz
@@ -339,9 +335,6 @@
 if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then
   /usr/bin/fc-cache -f %{global_font_dir} ||:
 fi
-if [ -x /usr/bin/mkfontdir ]; then
-  /usr/bin/mkfontdir %{local_x11_font_dir} ||:
-fi
 
 
 %postun x11
@@ -555,6 +548,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 19 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun at n-dimensional.de> - 4.28-1.fc10.1
+- generate fonts.dir at build time (bug 483589)
+
 * Sun Sep 21 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun at n-dimensional.de> - 4.28-1
 - Update to upstream's 4.28 release.
 - Add -dv1, -ge1, -ij1 patches for more general appeal in cyrillic world.



From ndim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 19 01:00:15 2009
From: ndim at fedoraproject.org (Hans Ulrich Niedermann)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/terminus-font/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.4,
	NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.4,
	NONE terminus-font-console.README.fedora, 1.3,
	NONE terminus-font-x11.README.fedora, 1.2,
	NONE terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example, 1.1,
	NONE terminus-font.spec, 1.8, NONE
Message-ID: <20090219010015.613C1700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ndim

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/terminus-font/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9463

Added Files:
	dead.package 
Removed Files:
	.cvsignore Makefile sources 
	terminus-font-console.README.fedora 
	terminus-font-x11.README.fedora 
	terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example terminus-font.spec 
Log Message:
terminus-font package renamed to terminus-fonts according to new rules:
 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482
 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248



--- NEW FILE dead.package ---
terminus-font package renamed to terminus-fonts according to new rules:
 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482
 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


--- .cvsignore DELETED ---


--- Makefile DELETED ---


--- sources DELETED ---


--- terminus-font-console.README.fedora DELETED ---


--- terminus-font-x11.README.fedora DELETED ---


--- terminus-font-x11.Xresources.example DELETED ---


--- terminus-font.spec DELETED ---



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 01:17:16 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:17:16 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190117.n1J1HGs5001268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 20:17:15 EDT ---
Releng ticket for removal of the old package:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1291

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 01:19:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JR0K001579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480482, which changed state.

Bug 480482 Summary: [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 01:19:26 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JQds001546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net




--- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 20:19:24 EDT ---
*** Bug 480482 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 01:19:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480482-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JPQF001538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE




--- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 20:19:24 EDT ---
This issue has been turned over to the review request for the new
terminus-fonts package over at bug 486248.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486248 ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 01:30:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:30:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190130.n1J1UgZN004074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #4 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-18 20:30:41 EDT ---
Koji scratch build results:

  dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137853
  dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137855

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:01:26 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:01:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477395-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190201.n1J21Qoj010605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395





--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 21:01:23 EDT ---
Actually a fixed package is already available and was waiting for someone who
would volunteers confirming a fix though..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:00:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190200.n1J20JdJ010126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477424, which changed state.

Bug 477424 Summary: [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:00:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:00:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477424-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190200.n1J20IBg010102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424


Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com>  2009-02-18 21:00:17 EDT ---
Removed the font from the package.  It was stupid to have it there to begin
with.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:05:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:05:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190205.n1J25LYV011641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042





--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 21:05:20 EDT ---
Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:02:52 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:02:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477453] [sazanami-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477453-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190202.n1J22q6i010772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453





--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 21:02:51 EDT ---
Actually a fixed package is already available and was waiting for someone who
would volunteers confirming a fix though..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:07:51 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:07:51 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190207.n1J27pAT012195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |202356




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 02:19:01 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:19:01 -0500
Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-484042-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190219.n1J2J1j5014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2009-02-18 21:19:01 EDT ---
forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 19 05:56:16 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 fontpackages.spec,
	1.13, 1.14 import.log, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.9, 1.10
Message-ID: <20090219055616.E5422700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32667/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources 
Log Message:
1.20


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- .cvsignore	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
+++ .cvsignore	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.10
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- fontpackages.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:02:42 -0000	1.13
+++ fontpackages.spec	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.14
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 %global rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
-Version: 1.19
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Version: 1.20
+Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
 Group:     Development/System
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 18 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.20-1
+??? global-ization
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 1.19-3
 ??? remove workaround and explicit version checks


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- import.log	16 Feb 2009 19:49:21 -0000	1.10
+++ import.log	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.11
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
 fontpackages-1_18-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233861977
 fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006
 fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732
+fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- sources	16 Feb 2009 18:30:58 -0000	1.9
+++ sources	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.10
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e46a2ed63b41f3dd113609aaa5c8f437  fontpackages-1.19.tar.bz2
+b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7  fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 06:32:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:32:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480454-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480454-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190632.n1J6WeDj030949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454


Sylvain Beucler <beuc at beuc.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #6 from Sylvain Beucler <beuc at beuc.net>  2009-02-19 01:32:39 EDT ---
Fixed in 1.08.20090120-2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 06:32:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:32:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190632.n1J6Wfjw030976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480454, which changed state.

Bug 480454 Summary: [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 09:31:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:31:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.
In-Reply-To: <bug-466404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902190931.n1J9VRUo002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404


Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |nphilipp at redhat.com
           Platform|i386                        |All
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |




--- Comment #8 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-19 04:31:25 EDT ---
Reopening because of the fontforge instability issue.

Regenerating the font cache files ("fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1")
doesn't help as the missing font files are referenced in the
xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 package, in the files /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir
and .../fonts.scale. Removing that package helps of course for running
fontforge, but then you're missing some fonts you may want to have.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 10:12:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:12:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on
 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450709-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902191012.n1JACOui011282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709


Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nphilipp at redhat.com
               Flag|needinfo?(rdtennent at hotmail |
                   |.com)                       |




--- Comment #23 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-19 05:12:20 EDT ---
I could reproduce this on F-10.

More infos about this can be found in the comments of bug #466404:

> Whenever fontforge crashes,  /var/log/Xorg.0.log updates
> $ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> [...]
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1
> FreeType: couldn't open face /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa: 1

When fontforge crashed on me, only these two files referenced "cour.pfa" in any
way:

/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir
/usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.scale

After I uninstalled and reinstalled xorg-x11-fonts-Type1, fontforge worked
again and the two files didn't reference cour.pfa anymore. It seems to me that
the mkfontdir, mkfontscale commands in the %post/%postun scripts fail to remove
references to fonts that are removed from the fonts.dir, fonts.scale files. In
that case, the problem is not in the fonts packages, but in these tools.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 10:19:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:19:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault.
In-Reply-To: <bug-466404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466404-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902191019.n1JAJd1l012895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404





--- Comment #9 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-19 05:19:38 EDT ---
I just installed the font package again, and it doesn't crash anymore. See my
comment on bug 450709 re: mkfontdir/mkfontscale issues.

So in order to test this I guess you would have to install and old version of
xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 that contained the IBM fonts with non-open source licenses
and the update to the current version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 10:38:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:38:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902191038.n1JAcg1A017674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383


Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs
                   |                            |-list at redhat.com)




--- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-19 05:38:41 EDT ---
After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the
font metadata:

It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant
package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"?

Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold
and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata.
Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly?

The license for both files is this:
- "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel
Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by
Petr Pisar, 2007."
- "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General
Public License."
- "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper
Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer"
I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 13:06:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:06:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from
 filesystem
In-Reply-To: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477046-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902191306.n1JD6gsb020235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046


Phil Knirsch <pknirsch at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 19 13:06:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:06:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902191306.n1JD6jcm020316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477046, which changed state.

Bug 477046 Summary: [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 19 21:19:06 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-10 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 fontpackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log,
	1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090219211906.44E36700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15440/F-10

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources 
Added Files:
	fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch 
Log Message:
1.20

fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch:

--- NEW FILE fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch ---
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec	2009-02-19 21:30:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:        Common files of <NAME>
+Group:          User Interface/X
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description common
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@
 # Repeat for every font family ???
 %package -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
+Group:          User Interface/X
 Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec	2009-02-19 21:28:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 %package fonts-common
 Summary:        Common files of <NAME>
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description fonts-common
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@
 %package <FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       %{name}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec	2009-02-19 22:08:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 %package <FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description <FAMILY>-fonts


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore	16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000	1.3
+++ .cvsignore	19 Feb 2009 21:18:35 -0000	1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- fontpackages.spec	16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000	1.2
+++ fontpackages.spec	19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
-%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
-%define rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
+%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
+%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
+%global rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
-Version: 1.15
+Version: 1.20
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
@@ -13,9 +13,12 @@
 License:   LGPLv3+
 URL:       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
 Source0:   http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Patch0:    %{name}-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch
+
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
+
 %description
 This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros
 and other materials used to create font packages.
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@
 Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages
 Group:   User Interface/X
 
-Requires:  rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description devel
 This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q
 
+%patch0 -p1 -b .badrpm
 
 %build
 
@@ -56,7 +60,7 @@
 for dir in fontbasedir        fontconfig_masterdir \
            fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do
   export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \
-    macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
+    rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
 done
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \
@@ -68,7 +72,7 @@
                    %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates
 install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec  %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir}
 install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir}
-install -m 0644 -p macros/macros*         %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
+install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros*            %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
 
 cat <<EOF > %{name}-%{version}.files
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
@@ -93,10 +97,15 @@
 %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec
 %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros*
 %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir}
-%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.20-1
+??? backport rawhide package to F-9 & F-10
+
 * Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 1.15-1
 ??? lua-ize the main macro


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229379612
 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131877
+fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235078269


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources	16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000	1.3
+++ sources	19 Feb 2009 21:18:36 -0000	1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4  fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
+b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7  fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 19 21:19:09 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-9 fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch, NONE,
	1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 fontpackages.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log,
	1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090219211909.DE19C700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15468/F-9

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources 
Added Files:
	fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch 
Log Message:
1.20

fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch:

--- NEW FILE fontpackages-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch ---
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec	2009-02-19 21:30:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 
 %package common
 Summary:        Common files of <NAME>
+Group:          User Interface/X
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description common
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@
 # Repeat for every font family ???
 %package -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
+Group:          User Interface/X
 Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-multi.spec	2009-02-19 21:28:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 %package fonts-common
 Summary:        Common files of <NAME>
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description fonts-common
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@
 %package <FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       %{name}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description -n %{fontname}-<FAMILY>-fonts
diff -uNr fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec
--- fontpackages-1.20.orig/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec	2009-02-18 23:47:53.000000000 +0100
+++ fontpackages-1.20/spec-templates/spectemplate-fonts-partial-simple.spec	2009-02-19 22:08:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 %package <FAMILY>-fonts
 Summary:        
 Group:          User Interface/X
-BuildArch:      noarch
 Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description <FAMILY>-fonts


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore	16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000	1.3
+++ .cvsignore	19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000	1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- fontpackages.spec	16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000	1.2
+++ fontpackages.spec	19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
-%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
-%define rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
+%global spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/
+%global ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/
+%global rpmmacrodir     %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
 
 Name:    fontpackages
-Version: 1.15
+Version: 1.20
 Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
@@ -13,9 +13,12 @@
 License:   LGPLv3+
 URL:       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/
 Source0:   http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Patch0:    %{name}-1.20-crufty-rpm.patch
+
 BuildArch: noarch
 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
+
 %description
 This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros
 and other materials used to create font packages.
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@
 Summary: Templates and macros used to create font packages
 Group:   User Interface/X
 
-Requires:  rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires: rpmdevtools, %{name}-filesystem = %{version}-%{release}
 
 %description devel
 This package contains spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to
@@ -45,6 +48,7 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q
 
+%patch0 -p1 -b .badrpm
 
 %build
 
@@ -56,7 +60,7 @@
 for dir in fontbasedir        fontconfig_masterdir \
            fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do
   export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \
-    macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
+    rpm/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }'))
 done
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \
@@ -68,7 +72,7 @@
                    %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates
 install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec  %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir}
 install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir}
-install -m 0644 -p macros/macros*         %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
+install -m 0644 -p rpm/macros*            %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir}
 
 cat <<EOF > %{name}-%{version}.files
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
@@ -93,10 +97,15 @@
 %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec
 %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros*
 %dir %{ftcgtemplatedir}
-%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*conf
+%{ftcgtemplatedir}/*txt
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 19 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 1.20-1
+??? backport rawhide package to F-9 & F-10
+
 * Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 1.15-1
 ??? lua-ize the main macro


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229380405
 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131899
+fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235078292


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources	16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000	1.3
+++ sources	19 Feb 2009 21:18:39 -0000	1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4  fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
+b836f00bcf709f42295f624bbf4f19c7  fontpackages-1.20.tar.bz2



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 09:46:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477401-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k9QT005441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |486269




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 09:46:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, 
 designed for code listings and the like, in print
In-Reply-To: <bug-431368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-431368-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k8M3005411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |486269




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 09:46:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k79G005382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com
             Blocks|                            |477401
         Depends on|                            |431368




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 04:46:06 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 10:29:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201029.n1KAT3PP013431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 05:29:02 EDT ---
1. a fontconfig ruleset would be nice
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F

2. FPC will want you to use %global not %define soonish
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define

3. Are you sure you want to provide the old name?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

Anyway, nothing here is blocking

??? APPROVED ???

Please do not forget the other steps in

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 11:41:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:41:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201141.n1KBfdTL031021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 06:41:38 EDT ---
Let me comment about the rpmlint output (available at
http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/rpmlint.txt):


terminus-fonts.spec:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

terminus-fonts.src:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

The /lib/kbd/consolefonts directory belongs to the kbd package, and the kbd
package itself hardcodes it as /lib/..., not /%{_lib} or %{_libdir} or anything
with macros. Following rpmlint's suggestions would likely break things.


terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/etc/fonts/conf.d/63-terminus.conf
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/63-terminus.conf
Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments.

terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative
/etc/X11/fontpath.d/terminus:unscaled /usr/share/fonts/terminus
Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments.

All the other packages putting symlinks into the /etc/X11/fontpath.d directory
also use absolute symlinks, so I am following a common practise here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 11:58:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:58:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201158.n1KBwCbK002762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?,
                   |                            |needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio
                   |                            |nal.de)




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 06:58:11 EDT ---
1. You can safely drop this comment
# Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does
# update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most
# recent file as version.

2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide?
Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F

3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in
/etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec

to simplify your spec

4. Group:  User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package

5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can
assume filesystem is at the right version
Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F

6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define

7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path?

8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency
rules (requires/buildrequires)

9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10

10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one.
Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're
not hard a all to fill

11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided
to have it nuked
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 13:24:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:24:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201324.n1KDOeTF023331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio |
                   |nal.de)                     |




--- Comment #7 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 08:24:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> 1. You can safely drop this comment
> # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does
> # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most
> # recent file as version.

Dropped.

> 2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide?
> Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2

No. Dropped. (Turned out not to be useful after all, I had misread the rpm
output.)

> 3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in
> /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec
> to simplify your spec

Done.

> 4. Group:  User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package

It is, but I cannot see any fitting rpm group. "Application/Text" does not work
either, because this is a font, not an application processing text. "System
Environment/Base" is the group of the kbd package which contains the other
console fonts, but terminus-fonts-console is not a required basic part of the
system environment either.

So, in the absences of a "Others" group, I don't see a group where this package
would really fit into.

Groups are not really used any more anyway, as far as I understand it, so it
probably has no consequences anyway. If you want the terminus-fonts-console
package in a specific, different group, I'm happy to change it, of course.

> 5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can
> assume filesystem is at the right version
> Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F

Dropped. F-10 shipped a newer filesystem package, and that is all I cared
about.

> 6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define

Changed.

> 7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path?

No. Changed to %{_sysconfdir}.

> 8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency
> rules (requires/buildrequires)

Done.

> 9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10

Changed: Removed the %dir, and versioned the build requirement for
fontpackages-devel.

> 10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one.
> Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're
> not hard a all to fill

Added a simple fontconfig file now.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips read as if anything
going beyond that empty noop fontconfig file was optional, and did not mention
those (really useful) templates.

> 11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided
> to have it nuked
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks

Good. I am ignoring those now.


I have uploaded the a version as terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 with all the above
changes incorporated:

 
http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts.spec
 
http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10.src.rpm
 
http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-fontconfig.conf

  http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/
 
http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 13:29:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:29:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201329.n1KDTjZj026220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #8 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 08:29:44 EDT ---
Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11:

  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 13:42:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201342.n1KDgRwN027834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #9 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 08:42:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11:
> 
>   http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218

This failed due to

    No Package Found for fontpackages-devel >= 1.20

However, now that I have removed the %dir %{_fontdir}, I need to require this
version, right?

Hmm. The fontpackages-1.20/changelog.txt suggests that requiring 1.18 would be
more appropriate, and koji has dist-f11 builds of 1.18 and 1.19, so that should
solve it.

I'll be uploading and test building terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 with
fontpackages-devel >= 1.18 shortly:

http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-6.fc10/
http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 13:49:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:49:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201349.n1KDnX3W001962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #10 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 08:49:32 EDT ---
Successful dist-f11 terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 koji scratch build:

  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142253

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 17:15:41 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:15:41 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201715.n1KHFf3i024777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #41 from Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-02-20 12:15:40 EDT ---
At last, I've found that cjkunifonts-uming package is the cause of this problem
in my environment.

It seems like gryphs from that package are chosen in some cases, even in
Japanese environments.
Japanese period followed by an alphabet is the one example.

After uninstalling that package, the problem goes away.
And I've confirmed that reinstalling this package caused the problem again.

I'll send you a detailed report later.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 17:24:34 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:24:34 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201724.n1KHOY0e019763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(fedora-fonts-bugs |
                   |-list at redhat.com)           |




--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 12:24:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> After I got fontforge working (bug #466404 and bug #450709), I looked into the
> font metadata:
> 
> It says that the font family is "PaperCuts 2.0". Would the resultant, compliant
> package name be "extremetuxracer-papercuts2_0-fonts"?

A strict reading of guidelines would be extremetuxracer-papercuts-2-0-fonts but
unless there is a 1.0 somewhere I'd say just drop the whole 2.0 thing and use
 extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts

> Two font files are included which have the same font in what I think is bold
> and outline weight. Still, the outline file says it is "bold" in its metadata.
> Should I fix this? Can you help me to do this properly?

Outline is not a "weight", and the fonts should belong to two different font
families. Modern fonts can only have faces/styles differing in weight
(bold/heavy), width (condensed/stretched), slant (italic/oblique), anything
else confuses applications.

Still, they both say they're the "PaperCuts 2.0" font family in "BoldOblique".
They should be font family A in Bold and font family B in bold (and drop the
silly version-in-name)

That should be easy enough to fix with fontforge but needs to be done upstream.

I advise packaging them as extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts and
extremetuxracer-papercuts-outline-fonts with the files unchanged from upstream,
and having the fonts fixed upstream

> The license for both files is this:
> - "Names/Copyright": "Made for ETR by cpicon92. Based on Paper Cuts Daniel
> Poeira, licensed under the GPL. Czech alphabet and U+00A0, U+2009 and U+202f by
> Petr Pisar, 2007."
> - "TTF Names/License": "The use of this font is granted subject to GNU General
> Public License."
> - "TTF Names/Descriptor": "A combination of Free Sans Bold Oblique and Paper
> Cuts, made by cpicon92 for Extreme Tux Racer"
> I know that GPL isn't an ideal license for a font, but is that acceptable?

We accept fonts under the GPL even if their use in embedding context is subject
to debate. If you can reach the various authors and make them re-license under
the GPL+font exception (with a specified GPL version range) that would be
better of course. Current freefont is GPLv3 + font exception, but the version
they used may have had some other licensing

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 16:59:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:59:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201659.n1KGxMMU020121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 11:59:21 EDT ---
Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be
revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother.

Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the
problems

??? APPROVED ???

You can now continue from

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 17:34:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:34:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201734.n1KHYUbs022110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477375, which changed state.

Bug 477375 Summary: [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RELEASE_PENDING             |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 17:34:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:34:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477375-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201734.n1KHYTRN022085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RELEASE_PENDING             |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 12:34:27 EDT ---
Please close bugs when you're done thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 17:42:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:42:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201742.n1KHgXec031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374





--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-20 12:42:31 EDT ---
@oron

(In reply to comment #8)
>  * Someone called my name ;-) [yes, I'm the slow Hebrew l10n coordinator]
>  * As for naming:

Actually the problem is not the naming, we have pretty clear naming rules
nowadays, the problem are the summaries/descriptions that need help from people
who actually use the fonts to become useful to new users

@rahul

1. I'm 100% sure we'll have less maintenance load long term if all our font
packages use the same kind of fontconfig rules

2. I think you misunderstood the Obsoleting stuff. The aim is not to have
compat obsolete the new packages which should be fine, the aim is to have it
obsolete the pre-split culmus-fonts < 0.101-6 to have yum update it
automatically

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 18:57:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:57:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201857.n1KIvvY2017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248





--- Comment #12 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 13:57:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be
> revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother.

FWIW, I have just added a short paragraph about the template files in
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/.

> Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the
> problems
> 
> ??? APPROVED ???

Thank you!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 19:00:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:00:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201900.n1KJ08PO011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 14:00:07 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: terminus-fonts
Short Description: Clean fixed width font
Owners: ndim
Branches:
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 19:40:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
In-Reply-To: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466369-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902201940.n1KJeItJ023335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369


Fran?ois Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lemenkov at gmail.com




--- Comment #40 from Fran?ois Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-20 14:40:14 EDT ---
*** Bug 444890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 20:01:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:01:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486641] New: library dependency issues
Message-ID: <bug-486641-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: library dependency issues

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486641

           Summary: library dependency issues
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: pango
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:

rpmlint pango
pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext
pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXft
pango.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrender
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.2300.0 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0.2300.0 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0.2300.0 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.2300.0 /lib/libm.so.6
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.2300.0 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
pango.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0.2300.0/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.23.0-2.fc11.i386

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 20:25:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:25:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902202025.n1KKPSBW009935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-20 15:25:27 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 21:08:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:08:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902202108.n1KL83IW015954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 486248, which changed state.

Bug 486248 Summary: Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 21:08:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:08:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486248-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902202108.n1KL82jr015912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #15 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de>  2009-02-20 16:08:01 EDT ---
terminus-fonts has been successfully built in rawhide, so I am closing this as
NEXTRELEASE.

Thanks for the help everyone.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 20 22:15:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:15:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902202215.n1KMFvH2004837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2009-02-20 17:15:56 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: bpg-fonts
Short Description: Georgian Unicode fonts
Owners: spot
Branches: F-9 F-10 devel
InitialCC: fonts-sig

...and it's done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 20 22:40:17 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.1,
	1.2 asana-math-fonts.spec, 
	1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090220224017.583D470102@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11163

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore asana-math-fonts.spec sources 
Removed Files:
	asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf 
Log Message:
Update to new packaging guidelines.
Upload actual font file to lookaside cache.




Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	13 Jul 2008 19:20:27 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	20 Feb 2009 22:39:45 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf


Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	14 Jul 2008 13:20:11 -0000	1.1
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:39:45 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,10 +1,24 @@
-%define fontname        asana-math
-%define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
-%define fontconfdir     %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
+# This template can be used with simple font releases
+# (one font family in one upstream archive):
+# ??? if you're unlucky enough upstream released several font families in a
+#   single archive, use spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec
+# ?????if upstream releases separate fonts in separate archives, do not try to
+#   stuff them in a single spec/package, just package them separately
+#
+# Please remove the template comments when creating your own file;
+# <FOO> must be replaced by something appropriate for your font.
+
+%define fontname asana-math
+%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf
+
+#define archivename %{name}-%{version}
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
+# Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does
+# update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most
+# recent file as version.
 Version:        0.914
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -12,10 +26,12 @@
 URL:            http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/asyropoulos/219
 Source0:        http://openfontlibrary.org/people/asyropoulos/asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf
 Source1:        %{name}-fontconfig.conf
-Source2:	README.license
-BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+Source2:        README.license
+BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
 BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description
 An OpenType font with a MATH table that can be used with XeTeX to typeset math
@@ -30,39 +46,35 @@
 
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
-install -pm 644 %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/asana-math.otf
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
 
-install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}
-install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
 
-
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
+        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
+      %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
 
 
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+%clean
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-%postun
-if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
-fi
 
+%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
 
-%files
-%defattr(644,root,root,755)
 %doc README.license
-%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf
-%dir %{fontdir}/
-%{fontdir}/*.otf
+
+%dir %{fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-2
+- Update to new packaging guidelines
+
 * Sun Jul 13 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-1
 - Change version
 - Include license readme


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	13 Jul 2008 19:20:27 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	20 Feb 2009 22:39:46 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+3008ab144432b8ced82920f286a9a57a  asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf


--- asyropoulos_-_Asana_Math.otf DELETED ---



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 20 22:45:08 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090220224508.5800570102@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11911

Modified Files:
	asana-math-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Remove comments from spec



Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:39:45 -0000	1.2
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:44:37 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,22 +1,7 @@
-# This template can be used with simple font releases
-# (one font family in one upstream archive):
-# ??? if you're unlucky enough upstream released several font families in a
-#   single archive, use spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec
-# ?????if upstream releases separate fonts in separate archives, do not try to
-#   stuff them in a single spec/package, just package them separately
-#
-# Please remove the template comments when creating your own file;
-# <FOO> must be replaced by something appropriate for your font.
-
 %define fontname asana-math
 %define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf
 
-#define archivename %{name}-%{version}
-
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
-# Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does
-# update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most
-# recent file as version.
 Version:        0.914
 Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
@@ -72,6 +57,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-3
+- Remove comments from spec
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-2
 - Update to new packaging guidelines
 



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 20 22:47:08 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:47:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090220224708.2EBCB70138@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12378

Modified Files:
	asana-math-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Bump release in specfile



Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:44:37 -0000	1.3
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:46:37 -0000	1.4
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.914
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
 
 Group:          User Interface/X



From kevin at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 21 00:48:07 2009
From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:48:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel sources, 1.23, 1.24 .cvsignore, 1.23,
	1.24 fontforge.spec, 1.39,
	1.40 fontforge-20081215-pangocairo.patch, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090221004808.001DB7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: kevin

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31338

Modified Files:
	sources .cvsignore fontforge.spec 
Removed Files:
	fontforge-20081215-pangocairo.patch 
Log Message:
Upgrade to 20081224
Enable python bindings



Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- sources	16 Dec 2008 22:12:42 -0000	1.23
+++ sources	21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000	1.24
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-fdbca231134755fd0cf20572d955855f  fontforge_full-20081215.tar.bz2
-f41861cdef84e282da5a765f644582e8  fontforge_htdocs-20081215.tar.bz2
+eb00467bff69b15a4137595c16cdbff5  fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2
+476b047dc6cdc36d79ac34da1c3fcb58  fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- .cvsignore	16 Dec 2008 22:12:42 -0000	1.23
+++ .cvsignore	21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000	1.24
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-fontforge_full-20081215.tar.bz2
-fontforge_htdocs-20081215.tar.bz2
+fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2
+fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2


Index: fontforge.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -r1.39 -r1.40
--- fontforge.spec	18 Dec 2008 03:31:27 -0000	1.39
+++ fontforge.spec	21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000	1.40
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
-%define docs_version 20081215
+%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
+
+%define docs_version 20081224
 %define gettext_package FontForge
 
 Name:           fontforge
-Version:        20081215
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Version:        20081224
+Release:        1%{?dist}
 Summary:        Outline and bitmap font editor
 
 Group:          Applications/Publishing
@@ -13,7 +15,6 @@
 Source1:        fontforge.desktop
 Source2:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fontforge/fontforge_htdocs-%{docs_version}.tar.bz2
 Source3:        fontforge.xml
-Patch1:         fontforge-20081215-pangocairo.patch
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
 Requires:       xdg-utils
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
 BuildRequires:  pango-devel
 BuildRequires:  cairo-devel
 BuildRequires:  libspiro-devel
+BuildRequires:  python-devel
 
 %description
 FontForge (former PfaEdit) is a font editor for outline and bitmap
@@ -53,8 +55,6 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}
 
-%patch1 -p1
-
 mkdir htdocs
 tar xjf %{SOURCE2} -C htdocs
 rm -rf htdocs/scripts
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' htdocs/corpchar.txt
 
 %build
-%configure --with-freetype-bytecode=no --with-regular-link
+%configure --with-freetype-bytecode=no --with-regular-link --enable-pyextension
 
 sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool
 sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@
 %{_datadir}/pixmaps/fontforge.png
 %{_mandir}/man1/*.1*
 %{_datadir}/mime/packages/fontforge.xml
+%{python_sitearch}/fontforge-1.0-py2.6.egg-info
+%{python_sitearch}/fontforge.so
+%{python_sitearch}/psMat.so
 
 %files devel
 %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
@@ -139,6 +142,16 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20081224-1
+- Upgrade to 20081224
+- Enable python bindings
+
+* Wed Jan 21 2009 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20081215-4
+- Add python-devel to BuildRequires
+
+* Tue Dec 23 2008 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20081215-3
+- Add patch to fix buffer overflow. Fixes 471538
+
 * Wed Dec 17 2008 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20081215-2
 - Add libspiro-devel to build with spiro
 


--- fontforge-20081215-pangocairo.patch DELETED ---



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 01:33:55 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210133.n1L1Xt5H009645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh
                   |                            |at.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 01:44:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:44:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210144.n1L1iNBe006287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #2 from Jay Hankinson <jeremy.hankinson at ingres.com>  2009-02-20 20:44:23 EDT ---
Correct SRPM URL:
http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts-20090125-1.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 02:08:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:08:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210208.n1L28di6011077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-20 21:08:38 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
NO - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
Embedded in font - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
faf9b021e799e6eddd5e6c0b3089a3f0  ruf.upstream.zip
faf9b021e799e6eddd5e6c0b3089a3f0  ruf.zip
N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang
N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used.
N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage.
N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
N/A - .la files are removed.

N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1143839
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
SEE ABOVE - No rpmlint output.
$ rpmlint *
chisholm-rubbing-fonts.src: E: invalid-spec-name
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1. Spec file name doesn't match the base package name - needs to be renamed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 02:29:25 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:29:25 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210229.n1L2TPKg019698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #4 from Jay Hankinson <jeremy.hankinson at ingres.com>  2009-02-20 21:29:24 EDT ---
Corrected spec file name. New spec file and SRPM uploaded.

Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubbing-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts-20090125-2.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 02:37:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:37:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210237.n1L2bH9t021355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #5 from Jay Hankinson <jeremy.hankinson at ingres.com>  2009-02-20 21:37:16 EDT ---
Real Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 02:40:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:40:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210240.n1L2e0ZD021647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 21 02:39:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:39:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902210239.n1L2dVl0016514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-20 21:39:31 EDT ---
Looks good to me, this package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 21 03:18:17 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:18:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090221031817.F172A7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17559

Modified Files:
	asana-math-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix install section



Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	20 Feb 2009 22:46:37 -0000	1.4
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 03:17:47 -0000	1.5
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.914
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
-install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                    %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 
-%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
+%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf
 
 %doc README.license
 
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-4
+- Fix *.ttf to *.otf
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-3
 - Remove comments from spec
 



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 21 07:03:06 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090221070306.9B68370104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5198

Modified Files:
	asana-math-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
Fix various build failures



Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 03:17:47 -0000	1.5
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:02:36 -0000	1.6
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.914
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
-install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
 
 install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
                    %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
@@ -53,10 +53,13 @@
 
 %doc README.license
 
-%dir %{fontdir}
+%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-5
+- Fix various build failures
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-4
 - Fix *.ttf to *.otf
 
@@ -73,4 +76,3 @@
 
 * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 20080120-1
 - Initial package
-



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 21 07:19:21 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:19:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 icelandic-fonts.spec,
	1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf, 1.1, NONE
Message-ID: <20090221071921.A50F370104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6723

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore icelandic-fonts.spec sources 
Removed Files:
	asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf 
Log Message:
Update to new packaging guidelines



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	13 Jul 2008 19:09:56 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	21 Feb 2009 07:18:51 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf


Index: icelandic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- icelandic-fonts.spec	14 Jul 2008 13:01:25 -0000	1.1
+++ icelandic-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:18:51 -0000	1.2
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
-%define fontname        icelandic
-%define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
-%define fontconfdir     %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
+%define fontname icelandic
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.001
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        Icelandic Magical Staves
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -12,9 +10,11 @@
 URL:            http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/asyropoulos/238
 Source0:        http://openfontlibrary.org/people/asyropoulos/asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf
 Source1:        README.license
-BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+BuildRoot:      %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
 
 BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem
 
 %description
 A font that includes most "magical" staves that have been "used" in Iceland.
@@ -22,43 +22,33 @@
 www.galdrasyning.is/.
 
 %prep
-cp %{SOURCE1} .
-
+cp %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_DIR
 
 %build
 
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}
-install -pm 644  %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/icelandic.otf
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
 
 
 %clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
-
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
-fi
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-%postun
-if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || :
-fi
 
+%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
 
-%files
-%defattr(644,root,root,755)
 %doc README.license
-%dir %{fontdir}/
-%{fontdir}/*.otf
+
+%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.001-3
+- Update to new packaging guidelines
+
 * Sun Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.001-2
 - Change font filename to something sane
 
@@ -69,3 +59,4 @@
 
 * Mon May 05 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.0-1
 - Initial package
+


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	13 Jul 2008 19:09:56 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	21 Feb 2009 07:18:51 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+8dda14e13b168a32375de10f0f98b12c  asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf


--- asyropoulos_-_Icelandic.otf DELETED ---



From jstanley at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 21 07:27:35 2009
From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:27:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090221072735.6AA6570104@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jstanley

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7165

Modified Files:
	icelandic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
No fontconfig file in this font - can't use the font_pkg macro



Index: icelandic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- icelandic-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:18:51 -0000	1.2
+++ icelandic-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:27:05 -0000	1.3
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.001
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        Icelandic Magical Staves
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -37,15 +37,27 @@
 %clean
 rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
+%post
+if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || :
+fi
+
+%postun
+if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
+    %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || :
+fi
 
-%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
-
-%doc README.license
-
+%files
+%defattr(644,root,root,755)
 %dir %{_fontdir}
+%{_fontdir}/*.otf
+%doc README.license
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.001-4
+- No fontconfig file, so can't use the font_pkg macro
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.001-3
 - Update to new packaging guidelines
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 00:58:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:58:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902220058.n1M0w4sP008828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477331, which changed state.

Bug 477331 Summary: [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 00:58:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:58:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902220058.n1M0w3GH008803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331


Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-21 19:58:01 EDT ---
This font has been converted in rawhide

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 10:25:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:25:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221025.n1MAP4Ce010993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477331, which changed state.

Bug 477331 Summary: [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 10:25:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:25:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477331-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221025.n1MAP3J4010967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-22 05:25:02 EDT ---
Please rename all your Open Font Library packages to oflb-foo-fonts

You have documentation on how to do it here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 22 10:42:36 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.8,
	1.9 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090222104236.B38C7700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11859/devel

Modified Files:
	gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec import.log sources 
Log Message:
stealth update


Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:42:05 -0000	1.9
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 %global archivename GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
-Version: 20070415
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Version: 20081217
+Release: 1%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20081217-1
+??? another GFS stealth update (thanks nirik)
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-9
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:47:54 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:42:06 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809363
 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229543250
+gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235299287


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources	26 Nov 2007 19:57:54 -0000	1.2
+++ sources	22 Feb 2009 10:42:06 -0000	1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cd015c3f302a3e6e39811509fe947e9e  GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT.zip
+41799cd503f81b0066ce339cd28b9265  GFS_NEOHELLENIC_OT.zip



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 22 10:47:38 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:47:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.4,
	1.5 import.log, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090222104738.E1A4C700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12368/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
fix url


Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.4
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:47:06 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081007
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
 License:   OFL
-URL:       ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{fontname}/
+URL:       ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/edrip/
 Source0:   %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2
 Source1:   %{name}-fontconfig.conf
 Patch0:    %{name}-license.patch
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@
 %doc *.txt README
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20081007-6
+??? fix url (thanks nirik)
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-5
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	8 Feb 2009 09:34:17 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:47:08 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608
+apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Sun Feb 22 10:51:45 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.5,
	1.6 import.log, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090222105145.808D7700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12847/devel

Modified Files:
	apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log 
Log Message:
fix url


Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.5
+++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:51:13 -0000	1.6
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20090125
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 Summary: Heuristica font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
 License:   OFL
-URL:       ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{fontname}/
+URL:       ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/heuristica/
 Source0:   %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2
 Source1:   %{name}-fontconfig.conf
 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 20090125-3
+??? fix url (thanks nirik)
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20090125-2
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:51:14 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc11.src.rpm:1226871596
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229540973
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233345796
+apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235299849



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 16:02:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:02:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221602.n1MG263n001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336


Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |477471




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 16:02:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:02:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221602.n1MG2509001295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471


Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sven at lank.es
         Depends on|                            |477336




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 16:35:21 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:35:21 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221635.n1MGZLrg011321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471





--- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es>  2009-02-22 11:35:20 EDT ---
Wow - this seems to be a rather large can of worms.

Some information that I was able to collect:

The current tuxpaint rpm ships 25 ttf-Files.

12 of those - namely /usr/share/tuxpaint/fonts/Free*.ttf

are part of the freefont-package. Freefont is in fedora but not yet converted
to the new guidelines see bz #477336

/usr/share/tuxpaint/fonts/default_font.ttf is actually DejaVuSansCondensed
which is packaged for fedora in the "dejavu-sans-fonts"-package.

ar.ttf is a font named ae_Nice from arabeyes.org - it doesn't seem to be
packaged for fedora at the moment

bo.ttf is a font named Tsampa Keyboard - not packaged as far as I can see -
seems to be tibetan

el.ttf is a font named Thryomanes - not packaged as far as I can see

gu.ttf - Lohit-Gujarati - Indian - packaged in lohit-gujarati-fonts.noarch

he.ttf - Nachlieli-Light - The font is available in fedora in
culmus-nachlieli-clm-fonts but that is not a ttf-font but a type1-font. I am
not sure if tuxpaint would work with that.

hi.ttf - Raghindi - not sure about this one - Raghindi seems to be a font
family and not a specific font? Any locals?

ja.ttf - Sazanami-Gothic-Regular - packaged as sazanami-gothic-fonts

ka.ttf - TuxPaintGeorgian (c) Gia Shervashidze - most certainly not packaged

ta.ttf - TSCu_Comic - not packaged but serafettin-cartoons-fonts is packaged
and has "It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project"
in it's description. That one might be sufficient.

te.ttf - Vemana2000 - not packaged

th.ttf - GarudaBold - packaged as thai-scalable-garuda-fonts

zh_tw.ttf - Traditional Chinese SubsetForTuxPaint - Tuxpaint ships ships a
script called maketuxfont.py for this font.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 18:09:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:09:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant
 OpenType font for Telugu
In-Reply-To: <bug-481009-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-481009-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221809.n1MI98hF025721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |477471




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Feb 22 18:09:07 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:09:07 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477471-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902221809.n1MI97Pu025692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |481009




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-22 13:09:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Wow - this seems to be a rather large can of worms.

Yes, we sort of pay our previous laxity. Lots of fonts that should have been
packaged long ago (of course it'd be better if the app just used fontconfig as
some of those have been replaced by better default since; this lists reads like
Debian defaults a few years ago)

> ar.ttf is a font named ae_Nice from arabeyes.org - it doesn't seem to be
> packaged for fedora at the moment

Arabeyes is not packaged, and the OLPC people want it too
There are two open reviews but they're stalled and the original packager has
not given any sign of life for a long time (bug #462711 and bug #461139)

> bo.ttf is a font named Tsampa Keyboard - not packaged as far as I can see -
> seems to be tibetan

LGPL font from http://tsampa.org/tibetan/software/tsamkey/
Could be packaged

> el.ttf is a font named Thryomanes - not packaged as far as I can see

It's in the wishlist
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Thryomanes_fonts

But it's not considered as good as the GFS fonts for example nowadays

> he.ttf - Nachlieli-Light - The font is available in fedora in
> culmus-nachlieli-clm-fonts but that is not a ttf-font but a type1-font. I am
> not sure if tuxpaint would work with that.

Try it?
Otherwise if the culmus project could just provide TTF or OTF versions of its
fonts, we'd certainly prefer them over type1

> hi.ttf - Raghindi - not sure about this one - Raghindi seems to be a font
> family and not a specific font? Any locals?

http://www.yudit.org/download/fonts/raghu.txt

Not modifiable, can not be packaged

> ka.ttf - TuxPaintGeorgian (c) Gia Shervashidze - most certainly not packaged

Good luck finding which one of its fonts it is, this guy created a lot of them
http://cg.scs.carleton.ca/~luc/georgia.html they're all over the net usually
without any clear licensing.

It would probably be best to try to contact the author and ask him to publish
some fonts in a canonical place with all the legalities taken care of.

http://blog.mozilla.com/seth/2008/11/07/gia-shervashidze-our-gerogian-localizer/

Otherwise spot packaged bpg fonts recently in bug#483865 , and DejaVu Sans has
Georgian support IIRC

> ta.ttf - TSCu_Comic - not packaged but serafettin-cartoons-fonts is packaged
> and has "It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project"
> in it's description. That one might be sufficient.

Right

> te.ttf - Vemana2000 - not packaged

Being packaged in bug #481009 (waiting on packager action, probably not stalled
yet)

> zh_tw.ttf - Traditional Chinese SubsetForTuxPaint - Tuxpaint ships ships a
> script called maketuxfont.py for this font.

Probably better to replace with whatever font is preferred for chinese nowadays
(ask juhp)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 04:11:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:11:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485857] Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-485857-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485857-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902230411.n1N4B0Pv002712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |i18n




--- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-22 23:10:59 EDT ---
Currently I got no resources on this and my current skills level is not enough
to deal with hintings from scratch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 04:08:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:08:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485857] Add Vietnamese Unicode Glyph support to Liberation
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-485857-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485857-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902230408.n1N48vV7029465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485857





--- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-22 23:08:56 EDT ---
* Vietnamese Vowel Plus Tone Mark Combinations *

"A portion of this block (U+1EA0..U+1EF9) comprises vowel letters of the modern
Vietnamese alphabet (quoc ngu) combined with a diacritic mark that denotes the
phonemic tone that applies to the syllable. In the modern Vietnamese alphabet,
there are 12 vowel letters and 5 tone marks." (The Unicode Consortium, "The
Unicode Standard 4.0". Addison Wesley, US, 2003.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 06:28:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:28:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902230628.n1N6S5H7029602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436





--- Comment #5 from Minto Joseph <mvaliyav at redhat.com>  2009-02-23 01:28:04 EDT ---
Hello,

Please have a look.

http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/padauk-fonts-2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/padauk-fonts.spec

Regards,
Mintos

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:26:42 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:26:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223082642.198747012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10728/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:47:08 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:26:11 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608
 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600
+apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235377546



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:27:54 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:27:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel import.log,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090223082754.E33727012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11072/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:51:14 -0000	1.4
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:27:24 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229540973
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233345796
 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235299849
+apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235377618



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:28:36 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223082836.6F49E7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11328/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:28:35 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-12.fc11.src.rpm:1229541266
 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242
 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-14_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-14.fc11.src.rpm:1232062969
+bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-15_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-15.fc11.src.rpm:1235377691



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:30:28 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel import.log,1.12,1.13
Message-ID: <20090223083028.D01D07012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11923/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- import.log	8 Feb 2009 09:12:06 -0000	1.12
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:29:58 -0000	1.13
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011
 dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218
+dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235377773



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:31:43 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:31:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel import.log,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090223083143.0273B7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12606/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- import.log	17 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0000	1.6
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:31:12 -0000	1.7
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232140382
 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232192497
 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7.fc11.src.rpm:1232193736
+ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-8.fc11.src.rpm:1235377848



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:32:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:32:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel import.log,1.11,1.12
Message-ID: <20090223083251.C24B77012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12915/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- import.log	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.11
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:32:21 -0000	1.12
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
 fontpackages-1_19-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234809006
 fontpackages-1_19-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.19-2.fc11.src.rpm:1234813732
 fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1234998636
+fontpackages-1_20-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235377920



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:34:00 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083400.D107C7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13197/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:25:25 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:33:30 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215804309
 gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229541904
+gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-ambrosia-fonts-20080624-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235377988



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:35:13 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083513.6AF387012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13498/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:27:14 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:34:43 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215807827
 gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542008
+gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-artemisia-fonts-20070415-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378061



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:36:25 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:36:25 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083625.383BD7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13836/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:28:57 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:35:54 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215808097
 gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229542115
+gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-baskerville-fonts-20070327-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235378131



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:37:38 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083738.5A08E7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14248/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:30:55 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:37:07 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215808489
 gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542223
+gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts-20070415-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378203



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:38:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:38:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083850.9B7867012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14625/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:32:35 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:38:19 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215808757
 gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229542332
+gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-bodoni-fonts-20070415-9.fc11.src.rpm:1235378277



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:39:59 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:39:59 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223083959.C64237012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14901/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:34:18 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:39:29 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809112
 gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229542434
+gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235378349



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:41:14 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223084114.6E4B77012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15204/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:35:56 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:40:43 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215300135
 gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-2_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-2.fc10.src.rpm:1215809169
 gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4.fc11.src.rpm:1229542534
+gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-5_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235378419



From kla at openoffice.org  Mon Feb 23 08:42:07 2009
From: kla at openoffice.org (kla at openoffice.org)
Date: 23 Feb 2009 08:42:07 -0000
Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement
 table
In-Reply-To: <iz98139@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090223084207.20091.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139





------- Additional comments from kla at openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 08:42:06 +0000 2009 -------
*** Issue 99349 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:42:52 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084252.8AC647012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15618/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:37:36 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:42:22 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809267
 gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229542633
+gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-didot-fonts-20070616-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235378495



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:44:02 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:44:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084402.9E33D7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15961/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:39:21 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:43:32 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215850441
 gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229542735
+gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-eustace-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378590



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:45:16 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084516.10AE27012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16324/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:41:00 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:44:45 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1215804948
 gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229542839
+gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-fleischman-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378661



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:46:34 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:46:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084634.B3B9D7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16578/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:42:45 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:46:04 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216755659
 gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229542939
+gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-garaldus-fonts-20080707-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378734



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:47:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084749.5829C7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16859/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:44:27 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:47:19 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3_fc10:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809328
 gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-5_fc11:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-5.fc11.src.rpm:1229543045
+gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-6_fc11:HEAD:gfs-gazis-fonts-20080318-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235378814



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:49:02 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223084902.0E1AA7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17113/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:46:11 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:48:31 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216483310
 gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229543149
+gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-jackson-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235378888



From kla at openoffice.org  Mon Feb 23 08:49:09 2009
From: kla at openoffice.org (kla at openoffice.org)
Date: 23 Feb 2009 08:49:09 -0000
Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement
 table
In-Reply-To: <iz98139@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090223084909.23950.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139





------- Additional comments from kla at openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 08:49:08 +0000 2009 -------
*** Issue 99482 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:50:15 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:50:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223085015.115067012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17378/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	22 Feb 2009 10:42:06 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:49:44 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809363
 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20070415-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229543250
 gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235299287
+gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1_fc11:HEAD:gfs-neohellenic-fonts-20081217-1.fc11.src.rpm:1235378962



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:51:25 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:51:25 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223085125.645057012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17624/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:49:50 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:50:54 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1_fc10:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216482262
 gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-3_fc11:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229543362
+gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-4_fc11:HEAD:gfs-nicefore-fonts-20080303-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235379032



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:52:38 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:52:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223085238.EAA4A7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17857/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:51:36 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:52:08 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-6_fc10:HEAD:gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-6.fc10.src.rpm:1215809420
 gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-8_fc11:HEAD:gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-8.fc11.src.rpm:1229543473
+gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-olga-fonts-20060908-9.fc11.src.rpm:1235379106



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:53:50 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223085350.2D8707012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18099/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:53:31 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:53:19 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8_fc10:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-8.fc10.src.rpm:1215809463
 gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-10.fc11.src.rpm:1229543577
+gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-porson-fonts-20060908-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235379178



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:55:01 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223085501.5C8B87012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18325/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:55:21 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:54:31 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809630
 gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-9_fc11:HEAD:gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229543694
+gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-10_fc11:HEAD:gfs-solomos-fonts-20071114-10.fc11.src.rpm:1235379250



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:56:12 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090223085612.908367012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18559/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 19:57:03 -0000	1.2
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:55:42 -0000	1.3
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7_fc10:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809664
 gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-11_fc11:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-11.fc11.src.rpm:1229543800
+gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-12_fc11:HEAD:gfs-theokritos-fonts-20070415-12.fc11.src.rpm:1235379320



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 08:57:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223085749.BE2EF7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18817/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:57:19 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809
 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232144541
 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-4_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233428004
+google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-5_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235379417



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:00:18 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090223090018.1C30F70131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19278/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 08:59:47 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 sil-andika-fonts-1_0-4_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233039407
+sil-andika-fonts-1_0-5_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235379566



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:01:36 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:01:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090223090136.1DDD670131@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19671/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 09:01:05 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224
+sil-charis-fonts-4_104-7_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-7.fc11.src.rpm:1235379642



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:04:09 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel import.log,1.4,1.5 xgridfit.spec,1.10,1.11
Message-ID: <20090223090409.592E97012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20719/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log xgridfit.spec 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- import.log	16 Feb 2009 23:26:32 -0000	1.4
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 09:03:38 -0000	1.5
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397
 xgridfit-1_17-1_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233346359
 xgridfit-1_17-2_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-2.a.fc11.src.rpm:1234826759
+xgridfit-1_17-3_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-3.a.fc11.src.rpm:1235379796


Index: xgridfit.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- xgridfit.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.10
+++ xgridfit.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:03:39 -0000	1.11
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:    xgridfit
 Version: 1.17
-Release: 2.a%{?dist}
+Release: 3.a%{?dist}
 Summary: Font hinting tool
 
 # This is where we drop fontforge
@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
+- 1.17-3.a
+??? global-ization
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.17-2.a
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:05:24 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:05:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223090524.C072C7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21004/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	17 Dec 2008 20:00:45 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 09:04:54 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3_fc10:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3.fc10.src.rpm:1215809853
 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-1_fc10:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220274279
 yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-3_fc11:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229544015
+yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-4_fc11:HEAD:yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20080723-4.fc11.src.rpm:1235379872



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:10:45 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 fontconfig.spec, 1.122, 
	1.123
Message-ID: <20090223091045.973497012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21733/devel

Modified Files:
	fontconfig.spec 
Added Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


--- NEW FILE import.log ---
fontconfig-2_6_97-4_g945d6a4_fc11:HEAD:fontconfig-2.6.97-4.g945d6a4.fc11.src.rpm:1235380189


Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.122
retrieving revision 1.123
diff -u -r1.122 -r1.123
--- fontconfig.spec	16 Feb 2009 11:34:37 -0000	1.122
+++ fontconfig.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:10:14 -0000	1.123
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%define freetype_version 2.1.4
+%global freetype_version 2.1.4
 
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
 Version: 2.6.97
-Release: 3.g945d6a4%{?dist}
+Release: 4.g945d6a4%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -135,6 +135,10 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 2.6.97-4.g945d6a4
+??? global-ization
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Richard Hughes <rhughes at redhat.com> - 2.6.97-3.g945d6a4
 - Correct the rpm provide name to be font(), not Font().
 



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:15:49 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:15:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge.spec,1.40,1.41 import.log,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090223091549.815897012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22446/devel

Modified Files:
	fontforge.spec import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: fontforge.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41
--- fontforge.spec	21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000	1.40
+++ fontforge.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0000	1.41
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
+%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")}
 
-%define docs_version 20081224
-%define gettext_package FontForge
+%global docs_version 20081224
+%global gettext_package FontForge
 
 Name:           fontforge
 Version:        20081224
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        Outline and bitmap font editor
 
 Group:          Applications/Publishing
@@ -142,6 +142,10 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
+- 20081224-2
+??? global-ization
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> - 20081224-1
 - Upgrade to 20081224
 - Enable python bindings


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- import.log	8 Nov 2008 10:52:34 -0000	1.1
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0000	1.2
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 fontforge-20080927-1_fc10:HEAD:fontforge-20080927-1.fc10.src.rpm:1226141478
+fontforge-20081224-2_fc11:HEAD:fontforge-20081224-2.fc11.src.rpm:1235380490



From nim at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 09:02:51 2009
From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel import.log,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223090251.A1A197012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: nim

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20449/devel

Modified Files:
	import.log 
Log Message:
F11 mass rebuild


Index: import.log
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- import.log	16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 -0000	1.3
+++ import.log	23 Feb 2009 09:02:21 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 stix-fonts-0_9-7_fc10:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809789
 stix-fonts-0_9-9_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229543904
 stix-fonts-0_9-10_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-10.fc11.src.rpm:1232141192
+stix-fonts-0_9-11_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-11.fc11.src.rpm:1235379717



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 10:27:57 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:27:57 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477436-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231027.n1NARvlC020074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l
                   |                            |aposte.net)




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 05:27:55 EDT ---
Hi Minto,

Thank you for looking at it.
You still have several leftovers from the previous templates (defines for
common directories, etc). I suggest you do a diff with the latest 
/etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec in fontpackages-devel 
and try to reduce the delta.

Fontpackages 1.20 should be queued for all releases but if it's not hit a
mirror next to you yet you can pull it directly from koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288

Also, please rename your package to sil-padauk-fonts as has already be done for
the other SIL fonts.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 10:54:52 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:54:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231054.n1NAsqFG025971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 05:54:51 EDT ---
Just a nitpicking

The font declares itself as "Rubbing Font". That's what fontconfig and apps
will see, so that's also what you need to use in your fontconfig rules

(I agree the "Font" bit is quite silly and upstream would be well advised to
drop it)

BTW, there are a few minor template changes in fontpackages-devel 1.20, but
nothing dangerous and your current spec will also work fine.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 15:01:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:01:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231501.n1NF1gYA022351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336


Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |486977




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 14:57:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:57:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231457.n1NEve8U021051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 09:57:39 EDT ---
>From #11, I've done 1, 2, 5 and 6.  I could use assistance with 3, 4, 7 and 8,
so I'll submit a review for the new package and set it blocking this bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 15:32:37 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:32:37 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231532.n1NFWbKv029811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 10:32:36 EDT ---
3. is mostly just filling the right template in 
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/
The feedback I have so far from the people who looked at them is that it was
harder to decide to look at them than actually use them. Can't do a lot for the
first part.

4. is mostly cosmetic

For 7 & 8 I'd be happy to clarify the doc or templates if you could tell me
what you don't understand (very frustrating to write help and not know what
part is wrong)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 15:40:47 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:40:47 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231540.n1NFelHe027814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 10:40:47 EDT ---
Well, for 7, do I need a compat- package?  I don't think I do.  For 8, I
already use -n in the %_font_pkg macro, is that sufficient?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 15:53:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:53:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231553.n1NFrREq002343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 10:53:26 EDT ---
You need a compat package if you want to provide an upgrade path for users of
the current package that upgrades to the full font set. Having the main package
require the other packages is a no-go, it kills modularity

For 8 if you do not use -n in %package and %description as documented in the
templates I'd be surprised if it built at all.

That still does not tell me what I should change in the doc to avoid the next
packager making the same mistakes :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 16:12:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:12:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231612.n1NGC33L007426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 11:12:02 EDT ---
How does a compat subpackage doing the same thing *not* kill modularity?

8: But it does.  I'll have another look at the templates.

As far as doc changes, maybe it's just me, but I find concrete examples to be
more illuminating that templates.  Could just be my learning style, but I had
more luck understanding what needed to be done (or so I thought) by looking at
the already-converted specs that at the templates.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 17:06:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:06:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231706.n1NH66N7019964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 12:06:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> How does a compat subpackage doing the same thing *not* kill modularity?

Because nothing depends on the compat package, it can be removed, and new
installes do not even see it exists

> 8: But it does.  I'll have another look at the templates.
> 
> As far as doc changes, maybe it's just me, but I find concrete examples to be
> more illuminating that templates.  Could just be my learning style, but I had
> more luck understanding what needed to be done (or so I thought) by looking at
> the already-converted specs that at the templates.

The problem with concrete example is a "pure" package is rather uncommon and
blind cut & pasting results in copying quirks.

But if you want to look at concrete converted packages, certainly there is no
lack of them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 17:18:19 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:18:19 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231718.n1NHIJEs022934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 12:18:18 EDT ---
repoquery gives me:
moodle-0:1.9.4-1.fc10.noarch
cinepaint-0:0.22.1-10.fc10.i386
plplot-0:5.9.0-2.svn8752.fc10.i386
gramps-0:2.2.10-1.fc9.noarch
ftgl-utils-0:2.1.2-8.fc9.i386
slingshot-0:0.8.1p-1.fc8.noarch
gramps-0:3.0.4-1.fc10.noarch
cinepaint-0:0.22.1-7.fc9.i386

That need freefont.  Moodle and slingshot are mine.  Would it not be better to
simply pull the band-aid off and fix all these right after
freefont>gnu-free-fonts, and be done with it?

I wasn't suggesting copy/pasting, just reading for guidance.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:06:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:06:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231806.n1NI6Bb1000875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state.

Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:06:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:06:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231806.n1NI69FD000826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445


Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com>  2009-02-23 13:06:08 EDT ---
I  think I took care of this awhile ago by just excluding the fonts from the
package and adding
Requires:       dejavu-fonts-sans

for the default situation.

Since scripts based on python-matplotlib can be configured to use additional
fonts in plotting output, It will be interesting to know how to get it to call
the font autoinstaller when a new font family is requested.

I'm going to close this bug out, as I think I've correctly addressed this in
the packaging. Please re-open if needed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:41:10 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:41:10 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231841.n1NIfAOI009174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 13:41:09 EDT ---
The point of a compat package is to kill the old name completely so packages
depending on it adapt to the new font name now. I think that's the same thing
you mean as pulling the band-aid (also the packagers of those should seriously
consider why they depend on freefont and not one of our default fonts)

But first, freefont packaging need to be fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:37:56 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:37:56 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231837.n1NIburM007438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477445, which changed state.

Bug 477445 Summary: [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:37:55 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:37:55 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231837.n1NIbtmX007409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 13:37:54 EDT ---
dejavu-fonts-sans existed before FPC engaged in naming bikesheding. Since FPC
changed the rules just before F11 alpha it was kept as provides to avoid alpha
breakage. However, it will be gone in this evening's rawhide

Behdad is probably the one you want to talk to if you want to know what will
trigger font autoinstall in F11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 18:50:40 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:50:40 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231850.n1NIoe3U010830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 13:50:39 EDT ---
Exactly! We both want that, I think, but what I'm getting at is, why is forcing
packages to move from freefont to freefont-compat to gnu-free-fonts better than
forcing packages to go from freefont to gnu-free-fonts?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 19:05:52 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:05:52 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231905.n1NJ5qtB015627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 14:05:50 EDT ---
IIRC freefont has several font families inside

So package deps need to move from
freefont 
to 
gnu-free-foo1-fonts, gnu-free-foo2-fonts, etc

And users need to be upgraded from
freefont
to
gnu-free-fonts-compat
that requires
gnu-free-foo1-fonts, gnu-free-foo2-fonts

A gnu-free-fonts package should never exist in the system or people will start
adding deps on it

I've tried to explain this in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Can.27t_I_use_my_old_package_name_instead_of_a_-compat_subpackage.3F

But I've clearly failed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 19:15:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:15:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231915.n1NJF2DV017995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net>  2009-02-23 14:15:01 EDT ---
So instead of main package, subpackages for font families and a compat package,
it's just the subpackages for font families and a compat package, so that there
is not an RPM that matches the name of the SRPM?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 19:25:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:25:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477336-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902231925.n1NJPCEZ021193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336





--- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-23 14:25:11 EDT ---
That way the only packages ending in -fonts in the repo are packages that
actually contain font files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 20:51:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:51:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font
 packaging guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477445-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232051.n1NKp0fL007015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445





--- Comment #7 from Jef Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com>  2009-02-23 15:51:00 EDT ---
shrug.. I take it I just need to change that requires definition to match the
naming.

-jef"bikesheds are a poor analogy where I live...sleddog doghouses..i can
relate to"spaleta

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From mtasaka at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 22:11:29 2009
From: mtasaka at fedoraproject.org (Mamoru Tasaka)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel efont-unicode-bdf.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223221129.F320070106@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: mtasaka

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30615/efont-unicode-bdf/devel

Modified Files:
	efont-unicode-bdf.spec 
Log Message:
Mass rebuild, etc part 2


Index: efont-unicode-bdf.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel/efont-unicode-bdf.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- efont-unicode-bdf.spec	18 Aug 2007 07:14:27 -0000	1.3
+++ efont-unicode-bdf.spec	23 Feb 2009 22:10:59 -0000	1.4
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{name}
 Version:        0.4.2
-Release:        7%{?dist}
+Release:        8%{?dist}
 Summary:        Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@
 %{catalogdir}/fonts-%{name}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 0.4.2-8
+- F-11: Mass rebuild
+
 * Sat Aug 18 2007 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> - 0.4.2-7
 - Drop X related dependency completely, along with chkfontpath drop
   (related to #252268, #252275)



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 22:16:43 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:16:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487061] New: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after
 update
Message-ID: <bug-487061-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061

           Summary: Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: vlgothic-fonts
        AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net
        ReportedBy: mcmonster at o2.pl
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net,
                    fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6

I'm using irssi on gnome-terminal (Monospace font), after update Japanese fonts
changed, they're now much smaller (compared to latin), harder to read (some
ideograms are completely unreadable). It is very annoying, because I use
Japanese and sit on Japanese channel a lot. The change occured only in
terminal, in gEdit and other applications old fonts are still used for typing
(SCIM + Anthy) and displaying.

The change didn't affect everyone, some Fedora 10 still got old, simple and
readable fonts.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Just try displaying any Japanese text.



This is the update, that probably changed fonts:

Feb 14 02:31:53 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:39 Installed: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:32:42 Installed: vlgothic-p-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
Feb 14 02:33:28 Erased: VLGothic-fonts
Feb 14 02:33:30 Erased: VLGothic-fonts-proportional

]# LANG=C yum list vlgothic\*
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
vlgothic-fonts.noarch                        20090204-2.fc10          
installed
vlgothic-fonts-common.noarch                 20090204-2.fc10          
installed
Available Packages
VLGothic-fonts.noarch                        20081029-1.fc10           updates  
VLGothic-fonts-proportional.noarch           20081029-1.fc10           updates  
vlgothic-p-fonts.noarch                      20090204-2.fc10           updates

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 22:30:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:30:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232230.n1NMUEk8030418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480447, which changed state.

Bug 480447 Summary: [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 22:30:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:30:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232230.n1NMUDeL030393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447


Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no>  2009-02-23 17:30:12 EDT ---
I hope it's ok now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 22:31:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:31:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480446-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232231.n1NMV8OF026888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446


Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no>  2009-02-23 17:31:07 EDT ---
I hope it's ok now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 22:31:09 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:31:09 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232231.n1NMV9IY026912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480446, which changed state.

Bug 480446 Summary: [e16] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 23:54:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:54:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232354.n1NNsBjE013631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 |CVE-2006-3467 freetype:
                   |freetype: integer overflow  |integer overflow
                   |vulnerability due to        |vulnerability due to
                   |incomplete fix for          |incomplete fix for
                   |CVE-2006-1861               |CVE-2006-1861




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 23:53:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:53:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] New: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer
 overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Message-ID: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
Alias: CVE-2006-3467

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070

           Summary: CVE-2006-3467 CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow
                    vulnerability due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
           Product: Security Response
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
               URL: http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-20
                    06-3467
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
 Status Whiteboard: impact=moderate,source=rehdat,reported=20060710,public
                    =20060718
          Keywords: Security
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: vulnerability
        AssignedTo: security-response-team at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: vdanen at redhat.com
                CC: ajax at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Other
    Target Release: ---


Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2006-3467 to
the following vulnerability:

Name: CVE-2006-3467
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3467
Assigned: 20060710
Reference: URL:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/451426/100/200/threaded
Reference: MISC: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190593

Integer overflow in FreeType before 2.2 allows remote attackers to cause a
denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PCF
file, as demonstrated by the Red Hat
bad1.pcf test file, due to a partial fix of CVE-2006-1861.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Mon Feb 23 23:59:48 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:59:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel abyssinica-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090223235948.9362F70106@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21542

Modified Files:
	abyssinica-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: abyssinica-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/abyssinica-fonts/devel/abyssinica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- abyssinica-fonts.spec	21 Dec 2008 11:13:12 -0000	1.3
+++ abyssinica-fonts.spec	23 Feb 2009 23:59:18 -0000	1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.0
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        SIL Abyssinica fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> 1.0-3
 - Updated to current Fedora font packaging guidelines
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Feb 23 23:58:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:58:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902232358.n1NNwxv8014704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|impact=moderate,source=rehd |impact=moderate,source=redh
                   |at,reported=20060710,public |at,reported=20060710,public
                   |=20060718                   |=20060718




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 00:33:19 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/alfont/devel alfont.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090224003319.5120170107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/alfont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28558

Modified Files:
	alfont.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: alfont.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/alfont/devel/alfont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- alfont.spec	19 Feb 2008 07:50:27 -0000	1.3
+++ alfont.spec	24 Feb 2009 00:32:49 -0000	1.4
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:           alfont
 Version:        2.0.6
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        Font rendering library for the Allegro game library
 Group:          System Environment/Libraries
 License:        FTL
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.6-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb 19 2008 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.6-4
 - Autorebuild for GCC 4.3
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 01:19:50 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090224011950.AE11870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4970

Modified Files:
	apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:47:06 -0000	1.5
+++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 01:19:20 -0000	1.6
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081007
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 %doc *.txt README
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20081007-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081007-6
 ??? fix url (thanks nirik)



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 01:20:44 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:20:44 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.6,
	1.7
Message-ID: <20090224012044.2DD3370107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5114

Modified Files:
	apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:51:13 -0000	1.6
+++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 01:20:13 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20090125
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: Heuristica font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20090125-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20090125-3
 ??? fix url (thanks nirik)



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 01:59:06 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec, 1.5, 
	1.6
Message-ID: <20090224015906.C159F70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12290

Modified Files:
	artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/devel/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	20 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0000	1.5
+++ artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 01:58:36 -0000	1.6
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           artwiz-aleczapka-fonts
 Version:        1.3
-Release:        6%{?dist}
+Release:        7%{?dist}
 Summary:        Set of (improved) artwiz fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.3-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Nov 20 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.3-6
 - font cleanup on fkp font (bz 472220)
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 02:00:54 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:00:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel asana-math-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090224020054.A915470107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12614

Modified Files:
	asana-math-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: asana-math-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/asana-math-fonts/devel/asana-math-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- asana-math-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:02:36 -0000	1.6
+++ asana-math-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 02:00:24 -0000	1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.914
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        An OpenType font with a MATH table
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.914-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.914-5
 - Fix various build failures
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 03:56:10 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:56:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090224035610.4A75870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6202

Modified Files:
	baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-bdf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec	14 Nov 2007 04:59:19 -0000	1.5
+++ baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 03:55:39 -0000	1.6
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Korean bitmap fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
 %{catalogue}/%{name}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Nov 14 2007 Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> - 2.2-5
 - better url
 - use fontname macro



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 03:57:01 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:57:01 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.16,1.17
Message-ID: <20090224035701.54C1670107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6382

Modified Files:
	baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 02:08:01 -0000	1.16
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 03:56:31 -0000	1.17
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        19%{?dist}
+Release:        20%{?dist}
 Summary:        Free Korean TrueType fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@
 %__rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-20
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 2.2-19.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#483327
 - Reowned font directory by subpackage -common.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 04:52:45 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:52:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel bitmap-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19
Message-ID: <20090224045245.D09B970107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20257

Modified Files:
	bitmap-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: bitmap-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitmap-fonts/devel/bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- bitmap-fonts.spec	14 Jul 2008 20:54:03 -0000	1.18
+++ bitmap-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 04:52:15 -0000	1.19
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: bitmap-fonts
 Version: 0.3
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 License: Lucida and MIT and Public Domain
 Source0: bitmap-fonts-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Source1: fixfont-3.5.tar.bz2
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
 %ghost %{_datadir}/fonts/bitmap-fonts/fonts.cache-1
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.3-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Jul 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> - 0.3-6
 - fix license tag
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 04:53:43 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.14,
	1.15
Message-ID: <20090224045343.298A870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20990

Modified Files:
	bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:19 -0000	1.14
+++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 04:53:12 -0000	1.15
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.10
-Release: 15%{?dist}
+Release: 16%{?dist}
 Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.10-16
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.10-15
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 04:59:15 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:59:15 -0500
Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-475743-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240459.n1O4xFML001697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743





--- Comment #42 from Ryo Dairiki <ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net>  2009-02-23 23:59:14 EDT ---
Problem:
- Chinese gryphs are shown when you use Monospace even in Japanese locale.
- Some characters seems different in the same context, as different gryphs are
selected according to the following characters.
(For example, the width of the space character followed by "A (alphabet)" has
different width with the one followed by "a (hiragana)".)

Reason:

Fontconfig choose proper gryph for virtual fonts, according to the current
locale, and the context.
If you write Japanese in Japanese locale, fontconfig seeks to fonts which has
Japanese gryphs.
It seems like some Chinese fonts also has Japanese gryphs by some reason.
Maybe, they are in CJ unified regions, so we cannot fix this problem simply by
eliminating them.
Talking about the second problem, both Japanese fonts and DejaVu fonts have
space characters, 
so fontconfig sometimes choose gryphs from Japanese fonts, and sometimes from
DejaVu fonts.

Solution:

Change the gryph selection order of Fontconfig.
In Japanese environment, gryphs from Japanese gryphs should be chosen first.
In Chinese environment, gryphs from Chinese gryphs should be chosen first.
Talking about DejaVu fonts, either locale specific gryphs or DejaVu gryphs
should be chosen 
independently with the context.
This change maybe require huge change in fonts.conf and might need some patches
in the source of fontconfig too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 05:49:34 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:49:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090224054934.1204370107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1834

Modified Files:
	brettfont-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: brettfont-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/brettfont-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- brettfont-fonts.spec	20 May 2008 00:22:48 -0000	1.3
+++ brettfont-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 05:49:03 -0000	1.4
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        20080506
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        A handwriting font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080506-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon May 19 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 20080506-3
 - Remove extraneous metadata (#447350)
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 06:48:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:48:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240648.n1O6mBms015968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>  2009-02-24 01:48:10 EDT ---
The issue is 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf. After renaming it to 67-... various
glyphs came up as gothic. This file probably needs to be split into a
high-priority serif portion, and a low-priority sans portion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 07:05:01 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:05:01 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090224070501.911E570107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18998

Modified Files:
	cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- cf-bonveno-fonts.spec	29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 -0000	1.1
+++ cf-bonveno-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 07:04:31 -0000	1.2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	1.1
-Release:	3%{?dist}
+Release:	4%{?dist}
 Summary:	A fun font by Barry Schwartz
 
 Group:		User Interface/X
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}/
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.1-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
 - 1.1-3
 - changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 07:05:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:05:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240705.n1O75dhG019133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 07:09:38 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:09:38 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240709.n1O79cpR019457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-24 02:09:38 EDT ---
Perhaps you can test with the cjkuni-*fonts packages in rawhide and see if that
works better for you?

They already have some fontconfig changes included.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 07:09:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:09:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240709.n1O79rXX019506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|low                         |medium




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 07:24:14 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel
	chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090224072414.CAB5270107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24264

Modified Files:
	chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec	28 Jan 2009 01:49:12 -0000	1.3
+++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 07:23:44 -0000	1.4
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        20090124
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        Decorative Sans Serif Font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20090124-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jan 27 2009 Clint Savage <herlo at fedoraproject.org> 20090124-2
 Fixed a typo in the changelog
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage <herlo at fedoraproject.org> 20090124-1



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 07:35:46 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:35:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090224073546.D2E3E70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27613

Modified Files:
	cjkuni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- cjkuni-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 01:27:16 -0000	1.6
+++ cjkuni-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 07:35:16 -0000	1.7
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 Name:        %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:     0.2.20080216.1
-Release:     20%{?dist}
+Release:     21%{?dist}
 Summary:     Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face.
 License:     Arphic
 Group:       User Interface/X
@@ -221,6 +221,9 @@
 %__rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.20080216.1-21
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb 03 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-20.fc11
 - Resolves: rhbz#483329
 - Reowned font directory by -common subpackage.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 07:47:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:47:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240747.n1O7lCFk025723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com>  2009-02-24 02:47:11 EDT ---
Installing the fonts from Rawhide did help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 09:40:23 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:40:23 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477374] [culmus-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477374-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902240940.n1O9eNaY018341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374





--- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-24 04:40:21 EDT ---
Nicolas,
As I said earlier, the configuration files were adopted from the upstream ones.
Besides, I do not see much syntactical  and semantic conflict between the
template and given conf files. I don't even have any knowledge pertaining to
the various other unavailable(to me) font families that are aliased or
substituted by given fonts. Thus I may not be able to provide aliases of my
own. Thus I really do not see any need to rewrite the configuration files and
keep this bug open for that reason. 

About obsoleting, yep I was confused a bit there, and followed the documented
stuff blindly. I will make that correction.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 10:08:21 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ctan-musixtex-fonts/devel ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090224100821.2110870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ctan-musixtex-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30529

Modified Files:
	ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ctan-musixtex-fonts/devel/ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec	24 Jan 2009 02:54:11 -0000	1.1
+++ ctan-musixtex-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 10:07:50 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.13
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
 Group:          User Interface/X
 License:        LPPL
@@ -39,5 +39,8 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.13-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Jan 21 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 1.13-1
 - Initial Fedora build



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 11:21:52 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:21:52 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec,1.97,1.98
Message-ID: <20090224112152.4F2D970107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15614

Modified Files:
	dejavu-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.97
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -r1.97 -r1.98
--- dejavu-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.97
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 11:21:21 -0000	1.98
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.28
-Release: 5%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary: DejaVu fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -242,6 +242,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.28-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 2.28-5
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 13:01:22 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090224130122.A0D4970107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9029

Modified Files:
	dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 19:46:39 -0000	1.2
+++ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 13:00:52 -0000	1.3
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       20030527
-Release:       2%{?dist}
+Release:       3%{?dist}
 Summary:       Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20030527-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Feb 01 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030527-2
 - Fix typo in description 
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 13:02:23 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, 1.3,
	1.4
Message-ID: <20090224130223.3962570107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9341

Modified Files:
	dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec	17 Jan 2009 23:30:13 -0000	1.3
+++ dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 13:01:52 -0000	1.4
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       20030318
-Release:       3%{?dist}
+Release:       4%{?dist}
 Summary:       General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20030318-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 20030318-3
 - rename according to new naming-guidelines
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 13:58:43 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224135843.AC4E270107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25827

Modified Files:
	ecolier-court-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- ecolier-court-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.8
+++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 13:58:13 -0000	1.9
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070702
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
 Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070702-9
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070702-8
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 14:39:35 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:39:35 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10
In-Reply-To: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241439.n1OEdZtd030838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589


Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs at n-dimensional.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |terminus-font-4.28-1.fc10.1
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 16:00:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:00:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241600.n1OG0DbR021249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|484443                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 15:59:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:59:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241559.n1OFxEnP020818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|484444                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 16:01:12 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:01:12 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241601.n1OG1CcP021612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|484441                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 16:00:43 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:00:43 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487070] CVE-2006-3467 freetype: integer overflow vulnerability
 due to incomplete fix for CVE-2006-1861
In-Reply-To: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487070-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241600.n1OG0h99021361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487070


Vincent Danen <vdanen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|484442                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 16:59:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:59:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for
 Fedora 11
In-Reply-To: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477044-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241659.n1OGxked003409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044


Bug 477044 depends on bug 477383, which changed state.

Bug 477383 Summary: [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 16:59:45 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:59:45 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477383] [extremetuxracer] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477383-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241659.n1OGxje0003385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383


Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com>  2009-02-24 11:59:41 EDT ---
I've built extremetuxracer-0.4-2.fc11 in Rawhide which attempts to fix these
issues. Please reopen if there is anything left to do.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 17:38:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:38:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241738.n1OHcHHt015414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com>  2009-02-24 12:38:17 EDT ---
Cool.  Jay, please apply for the 'packager' group in FAS and I'll sponsor you.

Thanks for everything, and it was great meeting you!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:48:15 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:48:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.123,1.124
Message-ID: <20090224174815.882CD70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29412

Modified Files:
	fontconfig.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fontconfig.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.123
retrieving revision 1.124
diff -u -r1.123 -r1.124
--- fontconfig.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:10:14 -0000	1.123
+++ fontconfig.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:47:44 -0000	1.124
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Summary: Font configuration and customization library
 Name: fontconfig
 Version: 2.6.97
-Release: 4.g945d6a4%{?dist}
+Release: 5.g945d6a4%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -135,6 +135,9 @@
 %{_mandir}/man3/*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.6.97-5.g945d6a4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 2.6.97-4.g945d6a4
 ??? global-ization



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:49:12 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel fontforge.spec,1.41,1.42
Message-ID: <20090224174912.393A270129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29616

Modified Files:
	fontforge.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fontforge.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42
--- fontforge.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:15:19 -0000	1.41
+++ fontforge.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:48:41 -0000	1.42
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:           fontforge
 Version:        20081224
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        Outline and bitmap font editor
 
 Group:          Applications/Publishing
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20081224-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 20081224-2
 ??? global-ization



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:51:11 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontpackages.spec,1.14,1.15
Message-ID: <20090224175111.377CC70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30640

Modified Files:
	fontpackages.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fontpackages.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- fontpackages.spec	19 Feb 2009 05:55:46 -0000	1.14
+++ fontpackages.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:50:40 -0000	1.15
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:    fontpackages
 Version: 1.20
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
 
 Group:     Development/System
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.20-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Feb 18 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject dot org>
 - 1.20-1
 ??? global-ization



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 17:51:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:51:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902241751.n1OHp5HI017806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421





--- Comment #16 from sami <swagiaal at redhat.com>  2009-02-24 12:51:03 EDT ---
Hey guys,

Any updates on this ?
This is still present in F10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:52:12 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,1.16,1.17
Message-ID: <20090224175212.20C7870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30810

Modified Files:
	fonts-ISO8859-2.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fonts-ISO8859-2.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel/fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- fonts-ISO8859-2.spec	18 Jul 2008 16:57:38 -0000	1.16
+++ fonts-ISO8859-2.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:51:41 -0000	1.17
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name: fonts-%{ISONAME}
 Version: 1.0
-Release: 19%{?dist}
+Release: 20%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Source: http://www.biz.net.pl/images/ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz
 %if %{include_ulT1mo}
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@
 %endif
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-20
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 18 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> - 1.0-19
 - fix license tag
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:53:13 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:53:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonts-KOI8-R/devel fonts-KOI8-R.spec,1.12,1.13
Message-ID: <20090224175313.103A170107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-KOI8-R/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31086

Modified Files:
	fonts-KOI8-R.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fonts-KOI8-R.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-KOI8-R/devel/fonts-KOI8-R.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
--- fonts-KOI8-R.spec	28 Aug 2007 03:29:25 -0000	1.12
+++ fonts-KOI8-R.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:52:42 -0000	1.13
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 %define catalogue /etc/X11/fontpath.d
 Name: fonts-%{ISONAME}
 Version: 1.0
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 #URL: <none yet>
 Source: http://www.inp.nsk.su/~bolkhov/files/fonts/cyr-rfx/srctgz/cyr-rfx-koi8-ub-1.1.bdfs.tar.bz2
@@ -96,6 +96,9 @@
 /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/100dpi
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Aug 21 2007 Karsten Hopp <karsten at redhat.com> 1.0-10
 - remove chkfontpath dependency (#252271)
 - fix URL, fix buildroot



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:54:11 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:54:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090224175411.5FCE970107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31394

Modified Files:
	fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec	18 Jul 2008 17:02:44 -0000	1.5
+++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:53:41 -0000	1.6
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy
 Version: 0.20051122
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 License: GPLv2
 Source0: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/comix.tar.gz
 Source1: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/dorian.tar.gz
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
 %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/fonts.cache-2
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.20051122-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 18 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> - 0.20051122-4
 - fix license tag
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:55:13 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.15,1.16
Message-ID: <20090224175513.625F470107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31704

Modified Files:
	fonttools.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fonttools.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
--- fonttools.spec	30 Nov 2008 00:53:21 -0000	1.15
+++ fonttools.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:54:42 -0000	1.16
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           fonttools
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back
 
 Group:          Development/Tools
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 2.2-3
 - Fix locations for Python 2.6
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 17:56:10 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:56:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fontypython/devel fontypython.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090224175610.1FBD370107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31910

Modified Files:
	fontypython.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: fontypython.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontypython/devel/fontypython.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- fontypython.spec	29 Nov 2008 16:36:57 -0000	1.6
+++ fontypython.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:55:39 -0000	1.7
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           fontypython
 Version:        0.3.6
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        TTF font manager
 
 Group:          Applications/Multimedia
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.3.6-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Nov 29 2008 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet+rpm at gmail.com> - 0.3.6-2
 - Rebuild for Python 2.6
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 18:20:21 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:20:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/freefont/devel freefont.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090224182021.CAF8970129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freefont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5476

Modified Files:
	freefont.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: freefont.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freefont/devel/freefont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- freefont.spec	18 Jul 2008 19:33:35 -0000	1.3
+++ freefont.spec	24 Feb 2009 18:19:51 -0000	1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:      freefont
 Version:   20080323
-Release:   1%{?dist}
+Release:   2%{?dist}
 Summary:   Free UCS Outline Fonts
 Group:     User Interface/X
 # Standard font exception
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080323-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 18 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20080323-1
 - fix license tag
 - update to 20080323



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 18:29:31 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:29:31 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.67,1.68
Message-ID: <20090224182931.6961170107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8405

Modified Files:
	freetype.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: freetype.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.67
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.67 -r1.68
--- freetype.spec	15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000	1.67
+++ freetype.spec	24 Feb 2009 18:29:01 -0000	1.68
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine
 Name: freetype
 Version: 2.3.8
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 License: FTL or GPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.freetype.org
@@ -219,6 +219,9 @@
 %doc docs/tutorial
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.3.8-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> 2.3.8-1
 - Update to 2.3.8
 - Remove freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 18:30:43 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/freetype1/devel freetype1.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090224183043.4385770107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8610

Modified Files:
	freetype1.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: freetype1.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype1/devel/freetype1.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- freetype1.spec	14 Jun 2008 08:41:03 -0000	1.5
+++ freetype1.spec	24 Feb 2009 18:30:12 -0000	1.6
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           freetype1
 Version:        1.4
-Release:        0.6.pre%{?dist}
+Release:        0.7.pre%{?dist}
 Summary:        Free TrueType font rendering engine, compatibility version
 Group:          System Environment/Libraries
 License:        FTL
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.4-0.7.pre
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Jun 14 2008 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> 1.4-0.6.pre
 - Backport fixes for CVE-2008-1806, CVE-2008-1807 and CVE-2008-1808 to
   freetype 1 (where applicable, bz 450773, 450774)



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:51:15 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224205115.3C8EF70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13360

Modified Files:
	gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-ambrosia-fonts/devel/gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-ambrosia-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:50:44 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080624
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Ambrosia majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080624-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080624-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:52:10 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:52:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11
Message-ID: <20090224205210.2437970107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13647

Modified Files:
	gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-artemisia-fonts/devel/gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.10
+++ gfs-artemisia-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:51:39 -0000	1.11
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Artemisia fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070415-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-10
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:52:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486221] spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro
 %{fontdir}
In-Reply-To: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242052.n1OKqg5M003577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221





--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-24 15:52:41 EDT ---
fontpackages-1.20-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:54:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10
In-Reply-To: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242054.n1OKskoG004261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|terminus-font-4.28-1.fc10.1 |4.28-1.fc10.1
         Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE              |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:52:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:52:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486221] spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro
 %{fontdir}
In-Reply-To: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242052.n1OKqk6H003603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |1.20-1.fc9
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:54:42 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:42 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10
In-Reply-To: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483589-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242054.n1OKsgJs005696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-24 15:54:42 EDT ---
terminus-font-4.28-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:53:07 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec, 1.10, 
	1.11
Message-ID: <20090224205307.9146D70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14031

Modified Files:
	gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-baskerville-fonts/devel/gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:20 -0000	1.10
+++ gfs-baskerville-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:52:37 -0000	1.11
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070327
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Baskerville Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070327-12
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070327-11
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:54:09 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:54:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,
	1.9, 1.10
Message-ID: <20090224205409.9C2AA70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14231

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:53:39 -0000	1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Bodoni Classic oblique Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070415-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-10
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:55:09 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:55:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10
Message-ID: <20090224205509.3B6E570129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14450

Modified Files:
	gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-bodoni-fonts/devel/gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-bodoni-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:54:38 -0000	1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Bodoni fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070415-10
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-9
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:59:50 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:59:50 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486221] spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro
 %{fontdir}
In-Reply-To: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242059.n1OKxofv006425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|1.20-1.fc9                  |1.20-1.fc10




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 20:59:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:59:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486221] spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro
 %{fontdir}
In-Reply-To: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486221-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242059.n1OKxkH3007976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221





--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-24 15:59:46 EDT ---
fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:57:05 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:57:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec, 1.9,
	1.10
Message-ID: <20090224205705.0C77270107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15852

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-didot-classic-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-didot-classic-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:56:34 -0000	1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080702
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Didot Classic Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080702-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080702-5
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:58:02 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel gfs-didot-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224205802.D50B270107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16215

Modified Files:
	gfs-didot-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-didot-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-didot-fonts/devel/gfs-didot-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-didot-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-didot-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:57:32 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070616
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Didot fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070616-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070616-10
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:58:55 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:58:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224205855.595E570107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16550

Modified Files:
	gfs-eustace-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-eustace-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-eustace-fonts/devel/gfs-eustace-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-eustace-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:58:25 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Eustace majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080303-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:59:47 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224205947.1CC1B70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16972

Modified Files:
	gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-fleischman-fonts/devel/gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-fleischman-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:59:16 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Fleischman majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080303-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:00:40 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224210040.D10AC70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17269

Modified Files:
	gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-garaldus-fonts/devel/gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-garaldus-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:00:10 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080707
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Garaldus majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080707-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080707-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:01:38 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:01:38 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10
Message-ID: <20090224210138.350A770107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17542

Modified Files:
	gfs-gazis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-gazis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-gazis-fonts/devel/gfs-gazis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:22 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-gazis-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:01:07 -0000	1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080318
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Gazis Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080318-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080318-6
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:02:30 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224210230.B5A5C70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17728

Modified Files:
	gfs-jackson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-jackson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-jackson-fonts/devel/gfs-jackson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-jackson-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:02:00 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Jackson majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080303-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:03:22 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec, 1.9,
	1.10
Message-ID: <20090224210322.B0FB170107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17954

Modified Files:
	gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-neohellenic-fonts/devel/gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	22 Feb 2009 10:42:05 -0000	1.9
+++ gfs-neohellenic-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:02:52 -0000	1.10
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20081217
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Neohellenic fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20081217-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Feb 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20081217-1
 ??? another GFS stealth update (thanks nirik)



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:04:14 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:04:14 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090224210414.AB8CB70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18229

Modified Files:
	gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-nicefore-fonts/devel/gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.4
+++ gfs-nicefore-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:03:44 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080303
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Nicefore majuscule Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080303-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080303-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:05:06 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel gfs-olga-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224210506.8481870107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18418

Modified Files:
	gfs-olga-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-olga-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-olga-fonts/devel/gfs-olga-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-olga-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:23 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-olga-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:04:36 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908
-Release: 9%{?dist}
+Release: 10%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Olga experimental oblique font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20060908-10
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-9
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:06:08 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:06:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel gfs-porson-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224210608.4860E70138@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18679

Modified Files:
	gfs-porson-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-porson-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-porson-fonts/devel/gfs-porson-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-porson-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-porson-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:06:07 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20060908
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Porson Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20060908-12
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20060908-11
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:07:10 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224210710.3F0DE70107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18962

Modified Files:
	gfs-solomos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-solomos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-solomos-fonts/devel/gfs-solomos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-solomos-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:06:40 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20071114
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Solomos oblique Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20071114-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20071114-10
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:08:07 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224210807.9D90670107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19290

Modified Files:
	gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-theokritos-fonts/devel/gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-theokritos-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:07:37 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070415
-Release: 12%{?dist}
+Release: 13%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Theokritos decorative font
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070415-13
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070415-12
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 21:23:23 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:23:23 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel ghostscript-fonts.spec,1.18,1.19
Message-ID: <20090224212323.3148770107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24560

Modified Files:
	ghostscript-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: ghostscript-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ghostscript-fonts/devel/ghostscript-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- ghostscript-fonts.spec	21 Jul 2008 17:58:03 -0000	1.18
+++ ghostscript-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 21:22:52 -0000	1.19
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary: Fonts for the Ghostscript PostScript interpreter
 Name: ghostscript-fonts
 Version: 5.50
-Release: 19%{?dist}
+Release: 20%{?dist}
 # Contacted Kevin Hartig, who agreed to relicense his fonts under the SIL Open Font 
 # License. Hershey fonts are under the "Hershey Font License", which is not what Fontmap 
 # says (Fontmap is wrong).
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
 %{catalogue}/default-ghostscript
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 5.50-20
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Jul 21 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> - 5.50-19
 - fix license tag
 - add licensing information for fhirw* and fkarw* fonts



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Tue Feb 24 20:56:11 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:56:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090224205611.1408770107@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15471

Modified Files:
	gfs-complutum-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: gfs-complutum-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gfs-complutum-fonts/devel/gfs-complutum-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:21 -0000	1.8
+++ gfs-complutum-fonts.spec	24 Feb 2009 20:55:40 -0000	1.9
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20070413
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: GFS Complutum Greek font
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070413-12
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20070413-11
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Feb 24 22:41:30 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:41:30 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative
 Sans Serif Font
In-Reply-To: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486687-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902242241.n1OMfU3I031061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687





--- Comment #9 from Jay Hankinson <jeremy.hankinson at ingres.com>  2009-02-24 17:41:30 EDT ---
Enjoyed meeting you all too. Very worth while afternoon.
What about the comments form Nicolas Mailhot? Presumably I need to re-do the
fontconfig file?

Also forgive my ignorance but remind me what/where FAS is again?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 00:13:13 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:13:13 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250013.n1P0DDAZ019292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269





--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-24 19:13:13 EDT ---
I've made those changes here: 

http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/levien-inconsolata-fonts/levien-inconsolata-fonts-1.01-2.fc11.src.rpm

However, it's not building here under mock. 
I can't seem to track down why. ;( 

Will keep looking, but if anyone has any ideas, let me know...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 00:22:20 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:22:20 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090225002220.4747670129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8883

Modified Files:
	google-droid-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: google-droid-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- google-droid-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:24 -0000	1.5
+++ google-droid-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 00:21:49 -0000	1.6
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here
 Version: 1.0.112
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -136,6 +136,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.112-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0.112-5
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 02:25:26 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:25:26 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480459-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250225.n1P2PQ87014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459


Jameson <imntreal at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Jameson <imntreal at gmail.com>  2009-02-24 21:25:25 EDT ---
Updated.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 02:25:27 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:25:27 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250225.n1P2PRNo014426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480459, which changed state.

Bug 480459 Summary: [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 03:23:25 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:23:25 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel hanazono-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090225032325.D684570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18438

Modified Files:
	hanazono-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: hanazono-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hanazono-fonts/devel/hanazono-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- hanazono-fonts.spec	24 Dec 2008 12:31:13 -0000	1.2
+++ hanazono-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 03:22:55 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	20081012
-Release:	6%{?dist}
+Release:	7%{?dist}
 Summary:	Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
 
 Group:		User Interface/X
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20081012-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Dec 24 2008 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20081012-6
 - Update the spec file to fit into new guideline. (#477395)
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 03:27:58 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:27:58 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel
	hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225032758.17C6E70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19430

Modified Files:
	hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts/devel/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec	14 Feb 2009 16:36:10 -0000	1.1
+++ hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 03:27:27 -0000	1.2
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        20070504
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -94,5 +94,8 @@
 %doc README *.pdf
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20070504-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Feb 1 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20070504-1
 - initial packaging



From cchance at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 04:02:30 2009
From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10 cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch, NONE,
	1.1 cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch, NONE,
	1.1 cjkunifonts.spec, 1.23, 1.24
Message-ID: <20090225040230.2377E70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: cchance

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28895

Modified Files:
	cjkunifonts.spec 
Added Files:
	cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch 
	cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch 
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10
- Resolves: rhbz#475743, rhbz#459680
- Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale.
- Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17.



cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch:

--- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch ---
diff -up cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.orig cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf
--- cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf.orig	2009-02-25 13:45:32.000000000 +1000
+++ cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf	2009-02-25 13:46:31.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,25 +1,40 @@
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
-	<alias>
-		<family>serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>sans-serif</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
-	<alias>
-		<family>monospace</family>
-		<prefer>
-			<family>AR PL UMing HK</family>
-			<family>AR PL UMing CN</family>
-		</prefer>
-	</alias>
+       <match>
+               <test name="lang" compare="contains">
+                       <string>zh</string>
+               </test>
+               <test name="family">
+                       <string>serif</string>
+               </test>
+               <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+                       <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+                       <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+               </edit>
+       </match>
+       <match>
+               <test name="lang" compare="contains">
+                       <string>zh</string>
+               </test>
+               <test name="family">
+                       <string>sans-serif</string>
+               </test>
+               <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+                       <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+                       <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+               </edit>
+       </match>
+       <match>
+               <test name="lang" compare="contains">
+                       <string>zh</string>
+               </test>
+               <test name="family">
+                       <string>monospace</string>
+               </test>
+               <edit name="family" mode="prepend" binding="same">
+                       <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+                       <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+               </edit>
+       </match>
 </fontconfig>

cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch:

--- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch ---
diff -up cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.19 cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf
--- cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.19	2009-02-25 13:48:06.000000000 +1000
+++ cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf	2009-02-25 13:48:32.000000000 +1000
@@ -1,15 +1,37 @@
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
 <fontconfig>
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <edit name="autohint"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+  </match>
 
-	<match target="font">
-	  <test name="family">
-	  <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
-	  <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
-	  </test>
-    	  <edit name="hinting"><bool>true</bool></edit>
-          <edit name="autohint"><bool>false</bool></edit>
-	</match>
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="pixelsize" compare="more_eq"><int>17</int></test>
+    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
+    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
+  </match>
+
+  <match target="font">
+    <test name="family">
+      <string>AR PL UMing CN</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing HK</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW</string>
+      <string>AR PL UMing TW MBE</string>
+    </test>
+    <test name="pixelsize" compare="less"><int>17</int></test>
+    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
+  </match>
 </fontconfig>


Index: cjkunifonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/F-10/cjkunifonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- cjkunifonts.spec	7 Dec 2008 09:08:43 -0000	1.23
+++ cjkunifonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 04:01:59 -0000	1.24
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name:        cjkunifonts
 Version:     0.2.20080216.1
-Release:     10.fc10
+Release:     11.fc10
 Summary:     Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face
 License:     Arphic
 Group:       User Interface/X
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
 Source7:    CIDFnmap.zh_TW
 Source8:    CIDFnmap.zh_CN
 Patch1:     cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch
+Patch2:     cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.patch
+Patch3:     cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-19.patch
+
 
 BuildRequires:    xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir
 BuildArch:        noarch
@@ -61,6 +64,8 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{name}-uming-%{version}
 %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667
+%patch2 -p1 -b .1-rhbz475743
+%patch3 -p1 -b .1-rhbz459680
 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{name}-ukai-%{version}
 
 %build
@@ -198,6 +203,11 @@
 %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10
+- Resolves: rhbz#475743, rhbz#459680
+- Fixed Japanese fonts over-priorized by uming fonts in Japanese locale.
+- Disabled antialias when pixelsize is smaller than 17.
+
 * Sun Dec  7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10
 - Don't umask before fc-cache.
 - Add -f to fc-cache.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 04:26:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:26:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250426.n1P4QIuq008549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-24 23:26:17 EDT ---
i have backported to F10:

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/cjkunifonts/0.2.20080216.1/11.fc10/noarch/cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10.noarch.rpm

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=86225

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 04:29:39 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:29:39 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250429.n1P4TdsL009238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-24 23:29:38 EDT ---
cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 05:13:44 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:13:44 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250513.n1P5DibC017231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(kee at ketan.jp)




--- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance <cchance at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 00:13:43 EDT ---
Hi Yuta, could you kindly provide the test case you mentioned in comment #1
please? Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:27:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:27:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250627.n1P6R5OB030609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2009-02-25 01:27:04 EDT ---
The package renaming changes %{fontname} and a define was changed to global.
Maybe there's a conflict with your use of $fontname in the fontforge script?

Otherwise, can you post failing build logs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 06:39:51 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090225063951.6E49670125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4299

Modified Files:
	icelandic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: icelandic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- icelandic-fonts.spec	21 Feb 2009 07:27:05 -0000	1.3
+++ icelandic-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 06:39:21 -0000	1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.001
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        Icelandic Magical Staves
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.001-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 20 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.001-4
 - No fontconfig file, so can't use the font_pkg macro
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:46:33 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:46:33 -0500
Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250646.n1P6kXfX001740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|9                           |10




--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 01:46:32 EDT ---
As usual no word from Behdad...

Sami, what font you want to see/use by default?  Does dejavu workforyou?

What is your testcase?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:50:31 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:50:31 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250650.n1P6oVZE002593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447





--- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>  2009-02-25 01:50:30 EDT ---
I got started on this but don't have time to finish it ATM.  Luke, Felix, do
either of you have time to work on this?  Here's what has to be done:

 * tgcaptcha has to be patched to search for the tuffy font in the system font
path.  I'll attach an untested patch to do that.  If it works, it should be
suitable for sending upstream as well.
 * tgcaptcha needs to not install the tuffy font.  I'll attach a new spec file
to do that.

 * tulrich-tuffy-fonts package needs to be created.  I have the beginnings of a
spec and a fontconfig file for that but couldn't get it to mock build (I can't
get python-tgcaptcha to build right now either so it might be some more general
problem... not sure.)  The SRPM is at
http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:56:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:56:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250656.n1P6ukeh003585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421





--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 01:56:45 EDT ---
Please include the output of "rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort"

eg http://ar.wikipedia.org/ looks ok to me on a default F10 and rawhide
installs currently.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:54:00 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:54:00 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250654.n1P6s0uF002926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447





--- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>  2009-02-25 01:53:59 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=333138)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333138)
Updated spec file to work with system installed fonts

This updated spec file applies the patch to use a system installed tuffy font
and removes the font files in the build step so they won't be installed from
the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 06:52:14 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:52:14 -0500
Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging
 guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-477447-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250652.n1P6qEcf002791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447





--- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>  2009-02-25 01:52:14 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=333137)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333137)
patch to use system installed tuffy font

This patch first checks the paths currently specified for the font file.  If it
isn't in any of those, it then checks /usr/share/fonts/tuffy/Tuffy.ttf

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 07:24:46 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:24:46 -0500
Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts -  Gentium
 Basic Font Family
In-Reply-To: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-456527-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250724.n1P7Okiq008037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 07:39:29 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:39:29 -0500
Subject: [Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the
 pre based glyph
In-Reply-To: <bug-445176-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445176-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902250739.n1P7dTq5010309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176


Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(apeter at redhat.com
                   |                            |)




--- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 02:39:28 EDT ---
Ani,Is it still present? I think this is fixed but cannot judge in the absence
of a screenshot :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 09:26:33 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090225092633.09A1070125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10697

Modified Files:
	jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec	26 Sep 2007 05:00:19 -0000	1.1
+++ jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 09:26:02 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:		jisksp16-1990-fonts
 Version:	0.983
-Release:	2%{?dist}
+Release:	3%{?dist}
 BuildArch:	noarch
 BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildRequires:	gzip mkfontdir xorg-x11-font-utils
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
 %{catalogue}/*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.983-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Sep 24 2007 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 0.983-2
 - Use %%setup.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 09:36:27 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:36:27 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel jomolhari-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090225093627.47BBB70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12451

Modified Files:
	jomolhari-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: jomolhari-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel/jomolhari-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- jomolhari-fonts.spec	29 Apr 2008 20:01:47 -0000	1.3
+++ jomolhari-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 09:35:56 -0000	1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:		jomolhari-fonts
 Version:	0.003
-Release:	5%{?dist}
+Release:	6%{?dist}
 Summary:	Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha
 
 Group:		User Interface/X
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
 %{fontdir}/
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.003-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Apr 29 2008 Marcin Garski <mgarski[AT]post.pl> 0.003-5
 - Update URL
 



From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org  Wed Feb 25 09:49:51 2009
From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:49:51 -0800
Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face
In-Reply-To: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
References: <bug-70132-291938@https.bugzilla.mozilla.org/>
Message-ID: <200902250949.n1P9npYo009547@mrapp51.mozilla.org>

Do not reply to this email.  You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132


Bug 70132 depends on bug 475164, which changed state.

Bug 475164 Summary: Starcraft Normal.ttf font doesn't work on Windows through @font-face
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475164

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 11:17:30 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:17:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel khmeros-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090225111730.80AC970125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1311

Modified Files:
	khmeros-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: khmeros-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/khmeros-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- khmeros-fonts.spec	25 Jan 2009 14:14:53 -0000	1.4
+++ khmeros-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 11:17:00 -0000	1.5
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        5.0
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 5.0-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 5.0-5
 - provide Obsoletes and dependency on -common pkg
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 11:40:51 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel knm_new-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090225114051.E8AE370125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6291

Modified Files:
	knm_new-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: knm_new-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel/knm_new-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- knm_new-fonts.spec	30 Oct 2007 02:28:18 -0000	1.2
+++ knm_new-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 11:40:21 -0000	1.3
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:		knm_new-fonts
 Version:	1.1
-Release:	3%{?dist}
+Release:	4%{?dist}
 BuildArch:	noarch
 BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildRequires:	mkfontdir
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.1-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Oct 30 2007 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 1.1-3
 - Remove the upstream's dead link from the spec file. (#353941)
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 12:15:10 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/devel kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225121510.82EA470125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14431

Modified Files:
	kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/devel/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec	26 Jan 2009 22:38:15 -0000	1.1
+++ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 12:14:40 -0000	1.2
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20020502
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 Summary: A widely used Kurdish font for Arabic-like scripts and Latin
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20020502-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Michal Nowak <mnowak at redhat.com> - 20020502-2
 - repackage to save myself a grief
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 13:20:24 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/libXfont/devel libXfont.spec,1.44,1.45
Message-ID: <20090225132024.C9EC470125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31528

Modified Files:
	libXfont.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: libXfont.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel/libXfont.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.44 -r1.45
--- libXfont.spec	18 Feb 2009 19:21:27 -0000	1.44
+++ libXfont.spec	25 Feb 2009 13:19:54 -0000	1.45
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary: X.Org X11 libXfont runtime library
 Name: libXfont
 Version: 1.4.0
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.x.org
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xfont.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.4.0-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Feb 18 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 1.4.0-2
 - libXfont 1.4.0
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 14:32:51 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:32:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.35,1.36
Message-ID: <20090225143251.3079670125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18202

Modified Files:
	liberation-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: liberation-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36
--- liberation-fonts.spec	5 Feb 2009 03:14:57 -0000	1.35
+++ liberation-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 14:32:20 -0000	1.36
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 Name:             %{fontname}-fonts
 Summary:          Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts
 Version:          1.04.93
-Release:          9%{?dist}
+Release:          10%{?dist}
 # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two 
 # exceptions:
 # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception.
@@ -134,6 +134,9 @@
 rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.04.93-10
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Feb 05 2009 Caius Chance <cchance at redhat.com> - 1.04.93-9.fc11
 - Fixed inter-subpackage dependencies with reference of dejavu.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 14:47:13 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/libfontenc/devel libfontenc.spec,1.24,1.25
Message-ID: <20090225144713.80FE170125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libfontenc/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21854

Modified Files:
	libfontenc.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: libfontenc.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libfontenc/devel/libfontenc.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25
--- libfontenc.spec	15 Jul 2008 17:32:40 -0000	1.24
+++ libfontenc.spec	25 Feb 2009 14:46:43 -0000	1.25
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary: X.Org X11 libfontenc runtime library
 Name: libfontenc
 Version: 1.0.4
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 URL: http://www.x.org
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/fontenc.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.4-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jul 15 2008 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 1.0.4-6
 - Fix license tag.
 



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 15:05:08 2009
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bpg-fonts/devel bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore,
	1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225150508.C386F70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28317/devel

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore sources 
Added Files:
	bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf bpg-fonts.spec 
	import.log 
Log Message:

Initial commit



--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Courier</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Glaho</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname bpg
%define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf
%define common_ver 20090205

%define common_desc BPG Fonts are a set of GPL licensed Georgian Unicode fonts.


Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Summary: 	Georgian Unicode fonts
Version:	%{common_ver}
Release:	5%{?dist}
# Font exception
# See: http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/gpl-gnu-license
# No version of the GPL is specified.
License:	GPL+ with exceptions
Group:		User Interface/X
# Source is actually http://bpg-fonts.googlegroups.com/web/BPG_GPL%26GNU_Fonts.zip
# but it is buried in Google Groups. Barf.
# Also, it has a & in its name, which confuses all sorts of things. 
# I renamed the zip file to replace & with _and_
Source0:	BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip
Source1:	%{name}-algeti-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	%{name}-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf
Source3:	%{name}-courier-fontconfig.conf
Source4:	%{name}-courier-s-fontconfig.conf
Source5:	%{name}-elite-fontconfig.conf
Source6:	%{name}-glaho-fontconfig.conf
Source7:	%{name}-ingiri-fontconfig.conf
Source8:	%{name}-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source9:	%{name}-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf
Source10:	%{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf
Source11:	%{name}-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source12:	%{name}-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf
Source13:	%{name}-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf
Source14:	%{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf
Source15:	%{name}-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf
URL:		http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel
BuildArch:	noarch

%description
%common_desc

%package common
Summary:	Common files for BPG Georgian fonts (documentation...)
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other BPG font packages.

%package -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
Summary:	Algeti Family of BPG Georgian Fonts
Version:	2.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Algeti font family.

%_font_pkg -n algeti -f %{fontconf}-algeti.conf "BPG_Algeti*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
Summary:	Chveulebrivi family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Chveulebrivi font family.

%_font_pkg -n chveulebrivi -f %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf "BPG_Chveulebrivi_*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
Summary:	Courier family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier -f %{fontconf}-courier.conf "BPG_Courier_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
Summary:	Courier S family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier S font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier-s -f %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf "BPG_Courier_S*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
Summary:	Elite family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Elite font family.

%_font_pkg -n elite -f %{fontconf}-elite.conf "BPG_Elite*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
Summary:	Glaho family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	9.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Glaho font family.

%_font_pkg -n glaho -f %{fontconf}-glaho.conf "BPG_Glaho*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
Summary:	Ingiri family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Ingiri font family.

%_font_pkg -n ingiri -f %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf "BPG_Ingiri*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium Cond family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium Cond font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium-cond -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_Cond*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
Summary:	Sans family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf "BPG_Sans_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
Summary:	Sans Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-medium -f %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf "BPG_Sans_Medium*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
Summary:	Sans Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.025
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-modern -f %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf "BPG_Sans_Modern*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
Summary:	Sans Regular family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Regular font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-regular -f %{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf "BPG_Sans_Regular*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
Summary:	Serif family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif -f %{fontconf}-serif.conf "BPG_Serif_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
Summary:	Serif Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.028
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif-modern -f %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf "BPG_Serif_Modern*.ttf"

%prep
%setup -q -c -n %{name}
%{__unzip} -qqo "%{SOURCE0}"
# correct end-of-line encoding
sed -i 's/\r//' "Docs/BPG_GPL&GNU_Fonts.txt"

%build

%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-algeti.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier-s.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-elite.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-glaho.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-ingiri.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE14} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE15} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}-algeti.conf %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf %{fontconf}-courier.conf %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf\
		%{fontconf}-elite.conf %{fontconf}-glaho.conf %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf\
		%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf\
		%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf %{fontconf}-serif.conf %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf
do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc Docs/*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-5
- take & out of filename

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-4
- missing semicolon in fontconfig files

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-3
- fix fontconfig files to not use reserved character, alias for fonts with old names

* Thu Feb 12 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-2
- update fontconfig files, change priority to 64
- don't need to own fontdir in -common, but we'll leave it in for good measure.

* Thu Feb 5 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-1
- update to 20090205 source with proper licensing

* Tue Feb 3 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090203-1
- Initial package for Fedora


--- NEW FILE import.log ---
bpg-fonts-20090205-5_fc11:HEAD:bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235574135


Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore	20 Feb 2009 22:13:48 -0000	1.1
+++ .cvsignore	25 Feb 2009 15:04:38 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	20 Feb 2009 22:13:48 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	25 Feb 2009 15:04:38 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+e6a20ce7171e40fe4fd77f4d97ac0efc  BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 15:08:32 2009
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bpg-fonts/F-10 bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225150832.1658570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29183/F-10

Modified Files:
	sources 
Added Files:
	bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf bpg-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial branching


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Courier</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Glaho</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname bpg
%define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf
%define common_ver 20090205

%define common_desc BPG Fonts are a set of GPL licensed Georgian Unicode fonts.


Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Summary: 	Georgian Unicode fonts
Version:	%{common_ver}
Release:	5%{?dist}
# Font exception
# See: http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/gpl-gnu-license
# No version of the GPL is specified.
License:	GPL+ with exceptions
Group:		User Interface/X
# Source is actually http://bpg-fonts.googlegroups.com/web/BPG_GPL%26GNU_Fonts.zip
# but it is buried in Google Groups. Barf.
# Also, it has a & in its name, which confuses all sorts of things. 
# I renamed the zip file to replace & with _and_
Source0:	BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip
Source1:	%{name}-algeti-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	%{name}-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf
Source3:	%{name}-courier-fontconfig.conf
Source4:	%{name}-courier-s-fontconfig.conf
Source5:	%{name}-elite-fontconfig.conf
Source6:	%{name}-glaho-fontconfig.conf
Source7:	%{name}-ingiri-fontconfig.conf
Source8:	%{name}-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source9:	%{name}-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf
Source10:	%{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf
Source11:	%{name}-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source12:	%{name}-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf
Source13:	%{name}-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf
Source14:	%{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf
Source15:	%{name}-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf
URL:		http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel
BuildArch:	noarch

%description
%common_desc

%package common
Summary:	Common files for BPG Georgian fonts (documentation...)
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other BPG font packages.

%package -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
Summary:	Algeti Family of BPG Georgian Fonts
Version:	2.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Algeti font family.

%_font_pkg -n algeti -f %{fontconf}-algeti.conf "BPG_Algeti*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
Summary:	Chveulebrivi family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Chveulebrivi font family.

%_font_pkg -n chveulebrivi -f %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf "BPG_Chveulebrivi_*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
Summary:	Courier family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier -f %{fontconf}-courier.conf "BPG_Courier_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
Summary:	Courier S family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier S font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier-s -f %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf "BPG_Courier_S*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
Summary:	Elite family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Elite font family.

%_font_pkg -n elite -f %{fontconf}-elite.conf "BPG_Elite*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
Summary:	Glaho family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	9.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Glaho font family.

%_font_pkg -n glaho -f %{fontconf}-glaho.conf "BPG_Glaho*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
Summary:	Ingiri family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Ingiri font family.

%_font_pkg -n ingiri -f %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf "BPG_Ingiri*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium Cond family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium Cond font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium-cond -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_Cond*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
Summary:	Sans family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf "BPG_Sans_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
Summary:	Sans Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-medium -f %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf "BPG_Sans_Medium*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
Summary:	Sans Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.025
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-modern -f %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf "BPG_Sans_Modern*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
Summary:	Sans Regular family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Regular font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-regular -f %{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf "BPG_Sans_Regular*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
Summary:	Serif family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif -f %{fontconf}-serif.conf "BPG_Serif_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
Summary:	Serif Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.028
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif-modern -f %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf "BPG_Serif_Modern*.ttf"

%prep
%setup -q -c -n %{name}
%{__unzip} -qqo "%{SOURCE0}"
# correct end-of-line encoding
sed -i 's/\r//' "Docs/BPG_GPL&GNU_Fonts.txt"

%build

%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-algeti.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier-s.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-elite.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-glaho.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-ingiri.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE14} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE15} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}-algeti.conf %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf %{fontconf}-courier.conf %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf\
		%{fontconf}-elite.conf %{fontconf}-glaho.conf %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf\
		%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf\
		%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf %{fontconf}-serif.conf %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf
do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc Docs/*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-5
- take & out of filename

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-4
- missing semicolon in fontconfig files

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-3
- fix fontconfig files to not use reserved character, alias for fonts with old names

* Thu Feb 12 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-2
- update fontconfig files, change priority to 64
- don't need to own fontdir in -common, but we'll leave it in for good measure.

* Thu Feb 5 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-1
- update to 20090205 source with proper licensing

* Tue Feb 3 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090203-1
- Initial package for Fedora


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	20 Feb 2009 22:13:48 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	25 Feb 2009 15:08:01 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+e6a20ce7171e40fe4fd77f4d97ac0efc  BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip



From spot at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 15:08:32 2009
From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/bpg-fonts/F-9 bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf, NONE,
	1.1 bpg-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225150832.7615E70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: spot

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29183/F-9

Modified Files:
	sources 
Added Files:
	bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf 
	bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf bpg-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
initial branching


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-algeti-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Algeti GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Chveulebrivi</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Chveulebrivi GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Courier</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Courier GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-courier-s-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Courier S GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-elite-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Elite GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-glaho-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
  <alias binding="same">
    <family>BPG Glaho</family>
    <accept>
      <family>BPG Glaho GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </accept>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-ingiri-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Ingiri GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium Cond GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Nino Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Medium GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>sans-serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Sans Regular GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>sans-serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf ---
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "../fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
  <alias>
    <family>serif</family>
    <prefer>
      <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    </prefer>
  </alias>
  <alias>
    <family>BPG Serif Modern GPL&#38;GNU</family>
    <default>
      <family>serif</family>
    </default>
  </alias>
</fontconfig>


--- NEW FILE bpg-fonts.spec ---
%define fontname bpg
%define fontconf 64-%{fontname}.conf
%define common_ver 20090205

%define common_desc BPG Fonts are a set of GPL licensed Georgian Unicode fonts.


Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
Summary: 	Georgian Unicode fonts
Version:	%{common_ver}
Release:	5%{?dist}
# Font exception
# See: http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/gpl-gnu-license
# No version of the GPL is specified.
License:	GPL+ with exceptions
Group:		User Interface/X
# Source is actually http://bpg-fonts.googlegroups.com/web/BPG_GPL%26GNU_Fonts.zip
# but it is buried in Google Groups. Barf.
# Also, it has a & in its name, which confuses all sorts of things. 
# I renamed the zip file to replace & with _and_
Source0:	BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip
Source1:	%{name}-algeti-fontconfig.conf
Source2:	%{name}-chveulebrivi-fontconfig.conf
Source3:	%{name}-courier-fontconfig.conf
Source4:	%{name}-courier-s-fontconfig.conf
Source5:	%{name}-elite-fontconfig.conf
Source6:	%{name}-glaho-fontconfig.conf
Source7:	%{name}-ingiri-fontconfig.conf
Source8:	%{name}-nino-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source9:	%{name}-nino-medium-cond-fontconfig.conf
Source10:	%{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf
Source11:	%{name}-sans-medium-fontconfig.conf
Source12:	%{name}-sans-modern-fontconfig.conf
Source13:	%{name}-sans-regular-fontconfig.conf
Source14:	%{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf
Source15:	%{name}-serif-modern-fontconfig.conf
URL:		http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts
BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires:	fontpackages-devel
BuildArch:	noarch

%description
%common_desc

%package common
Summary:	Common files for BPG Georgian fonts (documentation...)
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	fontpackages-filesystem

%description common
%common_desc

This package consists of files used by other BPG font packages.

%package -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
Summary:	Algeti Family of BPG Georgian Fonts
Version:	2.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-algeti-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Algeti font family.

%_font_pkg -n algeti -f %{fontconf}-algeti.conf "BPG_Algeti*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
Summary:	Chveulebrivi family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-chveulebrivi-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Chveulebrivi font family.

%_font_pkg -n chveulebrivi -f %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf "BPG_Chveulebrivi_*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
Summary:	Courier family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.002
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier -f %{fontconf}-courier.conf "BPG_Courier_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
Summary:	Courier S family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-courier-s-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Courier S font family.

%_font_pkg -n courier-s -f %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf "BPG_Courier_S*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
Summary:	Elite family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	3.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-elite-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Elite font family.

%_font_pkg -n elite -f %{fontconf}-elite.conf "BPG_Elite*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
Summary:	Glaho family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	9.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-glaho-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Glaho font family.

%_font_pkg -n glaho -f %{fontconf}-glaho.conf "BPG_Glaho*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
Summary:	Ingiri family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.000
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-ingiri-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Ingiri font family.

%_font_pkg -n ingiri -f %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf "BPG_Ingiri*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-nino-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
Summary:	Nino Medium Cond family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	4.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-nino-medium-cond-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Nino Medium Cond font family.

%_font_pkg -n nino-medium-cond -f %{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf "BPG_Nino_Medium_Cond*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
Summary:	Sans family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf "BPG_Sans_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
Summary:	Sans Medium family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-medium-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Medium font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-medium -f %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf "BPG_Sans_Medium*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
Summary:	Sans Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.025
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n	%{fontname}-sans-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-modern -f %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf "BPG_Sans_Modern*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
Summary:	Sans Regular family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-sans-regular-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Sans Regular font family.

%_font_pkg -n sans-regular -f %{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf "BPG_Sans_Regular*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
Summary:	Serif family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	1.005
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif -f %{fontconf}-serif.conf "BPG_Serif_GPL*.ttf"

%package -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
Summary:	Serif Modern family of BPG Georgian fonts
Version:	2.028
License:	Bitstream Vera
Group:		User Interface/X
Requires:	%{name}-common = %{common_ver}-%{release}

%description -n %{fontname}-serif-modern-fonts
%common_desc

This package contains the Serif Modern font family.

%_font_pkg -n serif-modern -f %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf "BPG_Serif_Modern*.ttf"

%prep
%setup -q -c -n %{name}
%{__unzip} -qqo "%{SOURCE0}"
# correct end-of-line encoding
sed -i 's/\r//' "Docs/BPG_GPL&GNU_Fonts.txt"

%build

%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-algeti.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-courier-s.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-elite.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-glaho.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-ingiri.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE14} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif.conf
install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE15} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf

for fontconf in %{fontconf}-algeti.conf %{fontconf}-chveulebrivi.conf %{fontconf}-courier.conf %{fontconf}-courier-s.conf\
		%{fontconf}-elite.conf %{fontconf}-glaho.conf %{fontconf}-ingiri.conf %{fontconf}-nino-medium.conf\
		%{fontconf}-nino-medium-cond.conf %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-sans-medium.conf %{fontconf}-sans-modern.conf\
		%{fontconf}-sans-regular.conf %{fontconf}-serif.conf %{fontconf}-serif-modern.conf
do
	ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf
done

%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}

%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc Docs/*
%dir %{_fontdir}

%changelog
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-5
- take & out of filename

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-4
- missing semicolon in fontconfig files

* Tue Feb 17 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-3
- fix fontconfig files to not use reserved character, alias for fonts with old names

* Thu Feb 12 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-2
- update fontconfig files, change priority to 64
- don't need to own fontdir in -common, but we'll leave it in for good measure.

* Thu Feb 5 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090205-1
- update to 20090205 source with proper licensing

* Tue Feb 3 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 20090203-1
- Initial package for Fedora


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/bpg-fonts/F-9/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources	20 Feb 2009 22:13:48 -0000	1.1
+++ sources	25 Feb 2009 15:08:02 -0000	1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+e6a20ce7171e40fe4fd77f4d97ac0efc  BPG_GPL_and_GNU_Fonts.zip



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 16:16:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:16:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 439421] Hard to read arabic fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-439421-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902251616.n1PGGx8Y003922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439421





--- Comment #19 from sami <swagiaal at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 11:16:57 EDT ---
Yes, I tried it on another f10 and it looked fine. I found that I had
paktype-fonts-2.0-2.fc8.noarch installed removed it and the page looked fine. I
installed dejavu and it looks even better.

I must have been carrying old settings since I did an upgrade

Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 18:05:49 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec, 1.6,
	1.7
Message-ID: <20090225180549.0C4B370125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17066

Modified Files:
	yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts/devel/yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:26 -0000	1.6
+++ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 18:05:18 -0000	1.7
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 20080723
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
 Summary: Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20080723-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 20080723-4
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 18:06:40 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:06:40 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090225180640.4089270125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18003

Modified Files:
	yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts/devel/yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 20:11:01 -0000	1.1
+++ yanone-tagesschrift-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 18:06:10 -0000	1.2
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        20050524
-Release:        1%{?dist}
+Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        A serif decorative latin font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -58,5 +58,8 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20050524-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Jan 28 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 20050524-1
 - initial packaging



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 18:24:36 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:24:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/taipeifonts/devel taipeifonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090225182436.A5AA170125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26750

Modified Files:
	taipeifonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: taipeifonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/taipeifonts/devel/taipeifonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- taipeifonts.spec	28 Nov 2007 01:07:00 -0000	1.2
+++ taipeifonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 18:24:06 -0000	1.3
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:       taipeifonts
 Version:    1.2
-Release:    5%{?dist}
+Release:    6%{?dist}
 Summary:    Chinese Bitmap Fonts
 
 Group:      User Interface/X
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@
 %{catalogue}/%{name}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.2-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Nov 15 2007 Philippe Troin <phil at fifi.org> - 1.2-5.fc9
 - Resolves: rhbz#386131 (Fonts not added to the font path catalogue.)
   <<<<< Put the fonts in the font catalogue.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 19:07:08 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:07:08 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902251907.n1PJ77tw017503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269





--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-25 14:07:07 EDT ---
Yeah, the old font fails exactly the same way, so it must be a change somewhere
in rawhide. ;( 

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1167442&name=build.log

+ fontforge -script - /builddir/build/SOURCES/Inconsolata.sfd
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams.
 Executable based on sources from 16:11 GMT 24-Dec-2008.
 Library based on sources from 16:11 GMT 24-Dec-2008.
  File "<stdin>", line 2
    while ( i < $argc )
                ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.e4UUpX (%build)

any ideas?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:06:11 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:06:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,1.6,1.7
Message-ID: <20090225200611.6B3AE70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5444

Modified Files:
	tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tetex-fonts-hebrew/devel/tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec	16 Feb 2009 09:08:25 -0000	1.6
+++ tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:05:41 -0000	1.7
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary: Culmus Hebrew fonts support for tetex
 Name: tetex-fonts-hebrew
 Version: 0.1
-Release: 10%{?dist}
+Release: 11%{?dist}
 URL: http://culmus.sf.net
 Source: tetex-fonts-hebrew-%{version}.tar.gz
 # No version specified.
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
 /usr/bin/texhash
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.1-11
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Caol??n McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> 0.1-10
 - fonts-hebrew -> culmus-fonts-compat
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:11:51 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel roadstencil-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Message-ID: <20090225201151.C563470125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8333

Modified Files:
	roadstencil-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: roadstencil-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- roadstencil-fonts.spec	12 Jul 2008 18:47:38 -0000	1.4
+++ roadstencil-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:11:21 -0000	1.5
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.0
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        Roadstencil Fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Jul 12 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 1.0-5
 - Fix the fontconfig file
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:33:18 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.10, 
	1.11
Message-ID: <20090225203318.9D6E570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18103

Modified Files:
	linux-libertine-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- linux-libertine-fonts.spec	21 Nov 2008 13:14:37 -0000	1.10
+++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:32:48 -0000	1.11
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:          linux-libertine-fonts
 Version:       4.1.8
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Linux Libertine Open Fonts
 Group:         User Interface/X
 License:       GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 4.1.8-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Nov 21 2008 Frank Arnold <frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de> 4.1.8-1
 - Updated to 4.1.8
 - Modified build procedure according to GENERATING.txt



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:34:17 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,
	1.3, 1.4
Message-ID: <20090225203417.4EF9070125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18459

Modified Files:
	tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec	29 Dec 2007 20:13:47 -0000	1.3
+++ tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:33:47 -0000	1.4
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:		tibetan-machine-uni-fonts
 Version:	1.901
-Release:	1%{?dist}
+Release:	2%{?dist}
 Summary:	Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi
 
 Group:		User Interface/X
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@
 %{fontdir}/
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.901-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sat Dec 29 2007 Marcin Garski <mgarski[AT]post.pl> 1.901-1
 - Update to 1.901
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:55:22 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:55:22 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090225205522.2550470125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27021

Modified Files:
	tiresias-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: tiresias-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- tiresias-fonts.spec	16 Feb 2009 19:58:12 -0000	1.3
+++ tiresias-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:54:51 -0000	1.4
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Summary: 	Low vision fonts
 Version:	1.0
-Release:	4%{?dist}
+Release:	5%{?dist}
 License:	GPLv3+
 Group:		User Interface/X
 Source0:	http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/infofont.zip
@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.0-4
 - fix packaging
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 20:57:30 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:57:30 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/lohit-fonts/devel lohit-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11
Message-ID: <20090225205730.7074570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27665

Modified Files:
	lohit-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: lohit-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- lohit-fonts.spec	13 Feb 2009 12:07:58 -0000	1.10
+++ lohit-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 20:57:00 -0000	1.11
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        2.3.1
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -256,6 +256,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.3.1-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 13 2009 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com> - 2.3.1-2.fc11
 - Updated according to new font packaging guidelines.
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 21:50:58 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:50:58 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480467-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902252150.n1PLowdk005175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467


Bernard Johnson <bjohnson at symetrix.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 21:50:59 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:50:59 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902252150.n1PLoxeL005207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480467, which changed state.

Bug 480467 Summary: [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 22:31:36 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:31:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090225223136.BF5C170125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31737

Modified Files:
	samyak-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: samyak-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- samyak-fonts.spec	4 Feb 2009 08:16:22 -0000	1.8
+++ samyak-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 22:31:06 -0000	1.9
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:	 %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	1.2.1
-Release:	4%{?dist}
+Release:	5%{?dist}
 Summary:	Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
 Group:	User Interface/X
 License:	GPLv3+ with exceptions
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.2.1-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Feb 04 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat.com> 1.2.1-4
 - renamed samyak-common-fonts to samyak-fonts-common
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Feb 25 22:27:49 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:27:49 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902252227.n1PMRnd2014251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477


Ville Skytt? <ville.skytta at iki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|ville.skytta at iki.fi         |
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ville.skytta at iki.fi




--- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? <ville.skytta at iki.fi>  2009-02-25 17:27:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Nicolas, this bug is assigned to you, see comment 2 and comment 4.  Do you
> intend to take care of it?

Apparently not.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 22:39:13 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel sazanami-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090225223913.59C0370125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2304

Modified Files:
	sazanami-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sazanami-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/sazanami-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sazanami-fonts.spec	28 Jan 2009 10:50:08 -0000	1.5
+++ sazanami-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 22:38:43 -0000	1.6
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	0.20040629
-Release:	6.%{fontver}%{?dist}
+Release:	7.%{fontver}%{?dist}
 BuildArch:	noarch
 BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 BuildRequires:	ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.20040629-7.20061016
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Jan 28 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 0.20040629-6.20061016
 - Rename the package name again.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 22:48:28 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:48:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/un-core-fonts/devel un-core-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090225224828.2184370125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6262

Modified Files:
	un-core-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: un-core-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/un-core-fonts/devel/un-core-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- un-core-fonts.spec	15 Oct 2008 06:07:54 -0000	1.2
+++ un-core-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 22:47:57 -0000	1.3
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 
 Name:        %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:     1.0.2
-Release:     0.6.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release:     0.7.%{alphatag}%{?dist}
 Summary:     Un Core family of Korean TrueType fonts
 Summary(ko): ?????? ????????? Core ??????
 
@@ -271,6 +271,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.2-0.7.080608
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Oct 14 2008 Dennis Jang <smallvil at get9.net> - 1.0.2-0.6.080608
 - fixed subpackage description and fontconfig.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 23:25:35 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:25:35 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/urw-fonts/devel urw-fonts.spec,1.32,1.33
Message-ID: <20090225232535.9514170125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/urw-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19516

Modified Files:
	urw-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: urw-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/urw-fonts/devel/urw-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33
--- urw-fonts.spec	9 Sep 2008 03:04:04 -0000	1.32
+++ urw-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 23:25:04 -0000	1.33
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Summary: Free versions of the 35 standard PostScript fonts.
 Name: urw-fonts
 Version: 2.4
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 Source: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/urw-fonts-%{filippov_version}.tar.bz2
 URL: ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/urw/release/
 # URW holds copyright
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@
 %{fontdir}/*.pfb
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.4-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Sep  8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2.4-6
 - fix license tag
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Wed Feb 25 23:46:18 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:46:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/mathml-fonts/devel mathml-fonts.spec,1.15,1.16
Message-ID: <20090225234618.5BD0F70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mathml-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27192

Modified Files:
	mathml-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: mathml-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mathml-fonts/devel/mathml-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
--- mathml-fonts.spec	7 Aug 2008 21:41:53 -0000	1.15
+++ mathml-fonts.spec	25 Feb 2009 23:45:48 -0000	1.16
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Summary: Mathematical symbol fonts
 Name:    mathml-fonts
 Version: 1.0 
-Release: 22%{?dist}
+Release: 23%{?dist}
 
 URL:     http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/fonts/
 # The actual license says "The author of these fonts, Basil K. Malyshev, has 
@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-23
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Aug  7 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.0-22
 - fix license tag
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 00:06:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:06:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902260006.n1Q06SLe031162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450





--- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-25 19:06:26 EDT ---
Testing package is on
http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/fbida-2.07-5.fc11.src.rpm but apparently koji
is broken, right now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 00:33:55 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:33:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec,
	1.1, 1.2
Message-ID: <20090226003355.B8E337010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14560

Modified Files:
	serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec	13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000	1.1
+++ serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:33:25 -0000	1.2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       0.5
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts
 Group:         User Interface/X
 License:       GPLv2+
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.5-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jan 13 2009 <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.5-1
 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 00:35:41 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:35:41 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.14,1.15
Message-ID: <20090226003541.19D937010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15289

Modified Files:
	mgopen-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: mgopen-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- mgopen-fonts.spec	25 Jan 2009 14:53:23 -0000	1.14
+++ mgopen-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:35:10 -0000	1.15
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 
 Name:      %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:   0.%{upstream_date}
-Release:   14%{?dist}
+Release:   15%{?dist}
 Summary:   Truetype greek fonts
 Group:     User Interface/X
 License:   MgOpen
@@ -157,6 +157,9 @@
 %files compat
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.20050515-15
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis at di.uoa.gr> - 0.20050515-14
 - Fix fontconfig file for moderna ,i.e. 
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425#c7



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 00:40:26 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:40:26 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel vlgothic-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090226004026.1B9DD7010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17339

Modified Files:
	vlgothic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: vlgothic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vlgothic-fonts/devel/vlgothic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- vlgothic-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 11:53:19 -0000	1.2
+++ vlgothic-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:39:55 -0000	1.3
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	20090204
-Release:	2%{?dist}
+Release:	3%{?dist}
 Summary:	Japanese TrueType font
 
 License:	mplus and BSD
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 20090204-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb 10 2009 Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> - 20090204-2
 - clean up.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 00:47:59 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:47:59 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel vollkorn-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090226004759.AE95270129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20002

Modified Files:
	vollkorn-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: vollkorn-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/vollkorn-fonts/devel/vollkorn-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- vollkorn-fonts.spec	2 Feb 2009 15:16:23 -0000	1.2
+++ vollkorn-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:47:29 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.008
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Release:        3%{?dist}
 Summary:        A serif latin font with good readability
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.008-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 02 2009 Paul Lange <palango at gmx.de> - 1.008-2
 move vollkorn.otf file out of the cvs repo
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 00:59:39 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:59:39 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel sil-andika-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090226005939.D7ED97010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24897

Modified Files:
	sil-andika-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sil-andika-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sil-andika-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sil-andika-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.3
+++ sil-andika-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:59:09 -0000	1.4
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.0
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.0-5
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:00:28 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:00:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel sil-charis-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4
Message-ID: <20090226010028.7428E7010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25169

Modified Files:
	sil-charis-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sil-charis-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sil-charis-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sil-charis-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.3
+++ sil-charis-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:59:58 -0000	1.4
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 4.104
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
 Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 4.104-8
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 4.104-7
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:01:23 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel sil-doulos-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090226010123.189067010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25519

Modified Files:
	sil-doulos-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sil-doulos-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel/sil-doulos-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-doulos-fonts.spec	30 Jan 2009 08:27:16 -0000	1.1
+++ sil-doulos-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:00:52 -0000	1.2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        4.104
-Release:        3%{?dist}
+Release:        4%{?dist}
 Summary:        Doulos SIL fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 4.104-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> - 4.104-3
 - Cleanup, remove Provides (Nicholas Mailhot)
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:02:33 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec, 1.1,
	1.2
Message-ID: <20090226010233.7F9487010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25858

Modified Files:
	sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/devel/sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec	3 Feb 2009 09:29:50 -0000	1.1
+++ sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:02:03 -0000	1.2
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 Name: %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 1.1
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
 Summary: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.1-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jan 30 2009 <b.rahul.pm at gmail.com> - 1.1-3.fc11
 - Changed the naming for srpm.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:04:26 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:04:26 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel silkscreen-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090226010426.47F567010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26389

Modified Files:
	silkscreen-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: silkscreen-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel/silkscreen-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- silkscreen-fonts.spec	15 Jan 2009 19:14:15 -0000	1.2
+++ silkscreen-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:03:56 -0000	1.3
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Summary: 	Silkscreen four member type family
 Version:	1.0
-Release:	2%{?dist}
+Release:	3%{?dist}
 # License attribution confirmed by author and Open Font Library
 # http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/jkottke/218
 License:	OFL
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 15 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 1.0-2
 - rework package for new font guidelines
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:18:59 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:18:59 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/devel sj-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090226011859.4E80C7010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30832

Modified Files:
	sj-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sj-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/sj-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sj-fonts.spec	27 Jan 2009 22:07:50 -0000	1.1
+++ sj-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:18:28 -0000	1.2
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       2.0.2
-Release:       1%{?dist}
+Release:       2%{?dist}
 Summary:       Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.2-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jan 25 2008 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 2.0.2-1
 - Initial packaging
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 01:42:09 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
Message-ID: <20090226014209.0DAAB7010C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5732

Modified Files:
	smc-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: smc-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- smc-fonts.spec	22 Jan 2009 17:54:18 -0000	1.5
+++ smc-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:41:38 -0000	1.6
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-fonts
 Version:	04.1
-Release:	4%{?dist}
+Release:	5%{?dist}
 Summary:	Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
 Group:		User Interface/X
 License:	GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and  GPLv2
@@ -145,6 +145,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 04.1-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jan 22 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar <rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com> 04.1-4
 - change descriptions
 - fix bug in kalyani font's obsoleting version number



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 02:33:42 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:33:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel sportrop-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090226023342.DE9E170133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23791

Modified Files:
	sportrop-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: sportrop-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel/sportrop-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sportrop-fonts.spec	29 Jul 2008 01:36:32 -0000	1.1
+++ sportrop-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 02:33:12 -0000	1.2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.9
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        A multiline decorative font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.9-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jul 27 2008 Jon Stanley <jonstanley at gmail.com> - 0.9-4
 - Revert package split, package only TTF
 - Use %%setup macro



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 03:14:04 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel stix-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9
Message-ID: <20090226031404.12BA170133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/stix-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5613

Modified Files:
	stix-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: stix-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- stix-fonts.spec	17 Feb 2009 19:09:25 -0000	1.8
+++ stix-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 03:13:33 -0000	1.9
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 0.9
-Release: 11%{?dist}
+Release: 12%{?dist}
 Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts
 
 Group:     User Interface/X
@@ -153,6 +153,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.9-12
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 0.9-11
 ??? prepare for F11 mass rebuild, new rpm and new fontpackages



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 03:33:29 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:33:29 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/myanmar3-unicode-fonts/devel myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec, 1.1, 
	1.2
Message-ID: <20090226033329.6255670129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/myanmar3-unicode-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12866

Modified Files:
	myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/myanmar3-unicode-fonts/devel/myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec	29 Sep 2008 06:08:26 -0000	1.1
+++ myanmar3-unicode-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 03:32:59 -0000	1.2
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 3.00
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
 Summary: Myanmar3 unicode font
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.00-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 
 * Fri Aug 01 2008 Minto Joseph <mvaliyav at redhat.com> - 3.00-1 
 - initial package



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 04:06:34 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:06:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec, 1.4, 
	1.5
Message-ID: <20090226040634.52D4470129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24257

Modified Files:
	nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/nafees-web-naskh-fonts/devel/nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec	21 Dec 2008 07:20:15 -0000	1.4
+++ nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 04:06:04 -0000	1.5
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.0
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script 
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-5
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Dec 21 2008 Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> 1.0-4
 - Builddep on fontpackages-devel
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 07:13:42 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:13:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,1.21,1.22
Message-ID: <20090226071342.57C5F70129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13692

Modified Files:
	wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-bitmap-fonts/devel/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
--- wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 05:49:48 -0000	1.21
+++ wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 07:13:12 -0000	1.22
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        0.9.9
-Release:        8%{?dist}
+Release:        9%{?dist}
 Summary:        WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.9.9-9
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 *Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 0.9.9-8
 - add bdftopcf to BuildRequires
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 07:14:42 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:14:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090226071442.B57B870129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13951

Modified Files:
	wqy-unibit-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: wqy-unibit-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/wqy-unibit-fonts/devel/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- wqy-unibit-fonts.spec	10 Feb 2009 07:00:18 -0000	1.2
+++ wqy-unibit-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 07:14:12 -0000	1.3
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:           %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:        1.1.0
-Release:        5%{?dist}
+Release:        6%{?dist}
 Summary:        WenQuanYi Unibit Bitmap Font
 
 Group:          User Interface/X
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.1.0-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 *Tue Feb 10 2009 Qianqian Fang <fangqq at gmail.com> 1.1.0-5
 - use fontpackages macro
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 08:04:04 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:04:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, 1.1,
	1.2
Message-ID: <20090226080404.6F15670129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29339

Modified Files:
	oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec	1 Feb 2009 08:55:26 -0000	1.1
+++ oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 08:03:34 -0000	1.2
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:		%{fontname}-sfd-fonts
 Version:	2.0.2
-Release:	3%{?dist}
+Release:	4%{?dist}
 Summary:	Old Standard True-Type Fonts
 
 Group:		User Interface/X
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}/
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.2-4
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha at fedoraproject.org>
 - 2.0.2-3
 - corrected the fontconfig



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 09:22:15 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:22:15 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/padauk-fonts/devel padauk-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2
Message-ID: <20090226092215.56AE370133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23174

Modified Files:
	padauk-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: padauk-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/padauk-fonts/devel/padauk-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- padauk-fonts.spec	17 Jul 2008 14:31:09 -0000	1.1
+++ padauk-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 09:21:45 -0000	1.2
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 Name:    %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 2.4
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 Summary: Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script
 
 Group:   User Interface/X
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.4-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 15 2008 Minto Joseph <mvaliyav at redhat.com> - 2.4-2
 - Changed setup macro and fontconfig rules
 - Changed fontconfig prefix



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 09:35:07 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel xgridfit.spec,1.11,1.12
Message-ID: <20090226093507.6900470129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xgridfit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27294

Modified Files:
	xgridfit.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: xgridfit.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- xgridfit.spec	23 Feb 2009 09:03:39 -0000	1.11
+++ xgridfit.spec	26 Feb 2009 09:34:37 -0000	1.12
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Name:    xgridfit
 Version: 1.17
-Release: 3.a%{?dist}
+Release: 4.a%{?dist}
 Summary: Font hinting tool
 
 # This is where we drop fontforge
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.17-4.a
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Feb 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
 - 1.17-3.a
 ??? global-ization



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 09:44:04 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:44:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.153,1.154
Message-ID: <20090226094404.93FEA70129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30578

Modified Files:
	pango.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: pango.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.153
retrieving revision 1.154
diff -u -r1.153 -r1.154
--- pango.spec	4 Feb 2009 19:07:24 -0000	1.153
+++ pango.spec	26 Feb 2009 09:43:34 -0000	1.154
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
 Name: pango
 Version: 1.23.0
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
 License: LGPLv2+
 Group: System Environment/Libraries
 Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.23.0-3
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Feb  4 2009 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo at redhat.com> - 1.23.0-2
 - Move pango-view from pango-devel to pango
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 11:29:28 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:29:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel xorg-x11-font-utils.spec,1.30,1.31
Message-ID: <20090226112928.A5BD570129@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32221

Modified Files:
	xorg-x11-font-utils.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: xorg-x11-font-utils.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-font-utils/devel/xorg-x11-font-utils.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
--- xorg-x11-font-utils.spec	15 Jul 2008 17:36:31 -0000	1.30
+++ xorg-x11-font-utils.spec	26 Feb 2009 11:28:57 -0000	1.31
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 # IMPORTANT: If package ever gets renamed to something else, remove the Epoch line!
 Epoch: 1
 Version: 7.2
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
 License: MIT
 Group: User Interface/X
 URL: http://www.x.org
@@ -146,6 +146,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1:7.2-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Jul 15 2008 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 7.2-6
 - Fix license tag.
 



From jkeating at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 11:30:28 2009
From: jkeating at fedoraproject.org (Jesse Keating)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel xorg-x11-fonts.spec,1.27,1.28
Message-ID: <20090226113028.66FAC70133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: jkeating

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32610

Modified Files:
	xorg-x11-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild


Index: xorg-x11-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel/xorg-x11-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.27 -r1.28
--- xorg-x11-fonts.spec	14 Jan 2008 17:49:43 -0000	1.27
+++ xorg-x11-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 11:29:58 -0000	1.28
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 Summary:	X.Org X11 fonts
 Name:		xorg-x11-fonts
 Version:	7.2
-Release:	6%{?dist}
+Release:	7%{?dist}
 License:	MIT and Lucida and Public Domain
 Group:		User Interface/X
 URL:		http://www.x.org
@@ -1158,6 +1158,9 @@
 %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_x11fontdir}/cyrillic/fonts.cache-*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 7.2-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> - 7.2-6
 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify,
   so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641)



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 12:48:03 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:48:03 -0500
Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB
 is rendering wrongly
In-Reply-To: <bug-479100-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-479100-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902261248.n1QCm34t030423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100





--- Comment #13 from Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera at redhat.com>  2009-02-26 07:48:01 EDT ---
U0cca gets normalized into u0cc6+u0cc2. Due to which the direct rules applied
for the above given conjuncts do not work. So, we have to write a 'psts' rule
for U0c9d+U0cc6+U0cc2. Only problem with this kind of rule is that even if the
u0c9d, u0cc6 and u0cc2 follow in this order they get combined instead of the
dotted circle being displayed after U0cc6. But that looks like a bug with pango
and not the font. So, I will be releasing the fix in this way in next release
of lohit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 14:18:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:18:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902261418.n1QEIMQg018622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480450, which changed state.

Bug 480450 Summary: [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 14:18:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:18:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480450-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902261418.n1QEIMMR018601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
                 CC|mcepl at redhat.com            |
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2009-02-26 09:18:20 EDT ---
Build as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=89370

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 14:32:17 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:32:17 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902261432.n1QEWHqj022183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-26 09:32:17 EDT ---
bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 14:32:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:32:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902261432.n1QEWM0J022221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-26 09:32:22 EDT ---
bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 20:14:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:14:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487581] New: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
 Diacritical Marks.
Message-ID: <bug-487581-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining Diacritical Marks.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581

           Summary: Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
                    Diacritical Marks.
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: adam.buchbinder at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
Gecko/2009020911 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.6

According to the bug on freedesktop.org (link below), Liberation Mono has an
incorrect spacing definition for "Combining Diacritical Marks"; they should
have zero space, and should render above the last letter, not the next one.

Paste following text with selected font:

Correct: accent above o
Incorrect: accent above g


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enter a string with a combining diacritic mark in Liberation Mono, e.g.,
"o?g". Don't use gnome-terminal; it relies on vte, which doesn't handle
combining characters. Use something like gedit; switching fonts will reveal the
issue as the diacritical mark switches places.
Actual Results:  
The diacritic appears one letter to the right of where it should be.

Expected Results:  
The diacritic should appear in the proper place.

I'm using ttf-liberation 1.04.93-1 on Ubuntu Intrepid; I'm filing this as an
upstream bug. If this should be filed elsewhere, please let me know.

I'm filing this because several monospace fonts have incorrect spacing for
"Combining Diacritical Marks":

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20330

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 20:19:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:19:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487581] Liberation Mono: incorrect spacing for Combining
 Diacritical Marks.
In-Reply-To: <bug-487581-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487581-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902262019.n1QKJOe7007947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487581





--- Comment #1 from Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder at gmail.com>  2009-02-26 15:19:23 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=333380)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333380)
Video of the issue being triggered.

This video shows the diacritic changing position when the selected font is
changed. Note that the diacritic moves to the right when Liberation Mono is
selected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 21:34:11 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:34:11 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487593] New: crash changing language in gdm
Message-ID: <bug-487593-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: crash changing language in gdm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593

           Summary: crash changing language in gdm
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: pango
        AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: pborelli at katamail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora


crash when changing language in gdm with latest rawhide (pango 1.23.0). Rolling
back to 1.22.4 fixes the crash

Reporting it here downstream because halfline advanced the doubt that gcc is to
blame.



stack trace follows...


gdm-simple-greeter[3141]: DEBUG(+): GdmGreeterClient: Calling SelectLanguage
gdm-simple-greeter[3141]: GLib-GObject-CRITICAL: g_object_unref: assertion
`G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
aborting...
gdm[3153]: ******************* START **********************************
gdm[3153]: [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Missing separate debuginfo for /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1
Try: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/57/cda01bc51f573b94787ce60581c62c82da3b62.debug
gdm[3153]: 0x004d02ce in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
gdm[3153]: #0  0x004d02ce in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
gdm[3153]: #1  0x0806f6a9 in crashlogger_get_backtrace () at
gdm-signal-handler.c:192
gdm[3153]: #2  gdm_signal_handler_backtrace () at gdm-signal-handler.c:219
gdm[3153]: #3  0x0806f7a1 in signal_handler (signo=-1079564500)
gdm[3153]:     at gdm-signal-handler.c:247
gdm[3153]: #4  <signal handler called>
gdm[3153]: #5  IA__g_logv (log_domain=<value optimized out>, 
gdm[3153]:     log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, 
gdm[3153]:     format=0x572395 "%s: assertion `%s' failed", args1=0xbfa7318c
"JJa")
gdm[3153]:     at gmessages.c:503
gdm[3153]: #6  0x0051e686 in IA__g_log (log_domain=0x61313c "GLib-GObject", 
gdm[3153]:     log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, 
gdm[3153]:     format=0x572395 "%s: assertion `%s' failed") at gmessages.c:517
gdm[3153]: #7  0x0051e8eb in IA__g_return_if_fail_warning (
gdm[3153]:     log_domain=0x61313c "GLib-GObject", 
gdm[3153]:     pretty_function=0x614a4a "g_object_unref", 
gdm[3153]:     expression=0x613d12 "G_IS_OBJECT (object)") at gmessages.c:532
gdm[3153]: #8  0x005eb57c in IA__g_object_unref (_object=0x0) at gobject.c:2371
gdm[3153]: #9  0x001c6738 in pango_fc_fontset_finalize (object=0xa569878)
gdm[3153]:     at pangofc-fontmap.c:842
gdm[3153]: #10 0x005eb693 in IA__g_object_unref (_object=0xa569878) at
gobject.c:2421
gdm[3153]: #11 0x00505cd4 in g_hash_table_remove_node (hash_table=0xa04ba90, 
gdm[3153]:     node=0xa65d584, notify=1) at ghash.c:335
gdm[3153]: #12 0x005073dc in g_hash_table_remove_internal
(hash_table=0xa04ba90, 
gdm[3153]:     key=<value optimized out>, notify=1) at ghash.c:980
gdm[3153]: #13 0x001c6f10 in pango_fc_fontset_cache (fcfontmap=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     fontset=<value optimized out>) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1619
gdm[3153]: #14 pango_fc_font_map_load_fontset (fontmap=0xa007418,
context=0xa1e7660, 
gdm[3153]:     desc=0xa61e260, language=0xa5b1004) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1656
gdm[3153]: #15 0x00ad5eca in pango_font_map_load_fontset (fontmap=0xa007418, 
gdm[3153]:     context=0xa1e7660, desc=0xa61e260, language=0xa5b1004)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-fontmap.c:138
gdm[3153]: #16 0x00ad3a4c in itemize_state_update_for_new_run (
gdm[3153]:     state=<value optimized out>) at pango-context.c:1288
gdm[3153]: #17 itemize_state_process_run (state=0xbfa734e4) at
pango-context.c:1327
gdm[3153]: #18 0x00ad3f7f in pango_itemize_with_base_dir (context=0xa1e7660, 
gdm[3153]:     base_dir=PANGO_DIRECTION_LTR, text=0xa2a1260 "Gaeilge
(?\211ire)", 
gdm[3153]:     start_index=0, length=15, attrs=0xa1e4f80,
cached_iter=0xa5ae1d0)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-context.c:1466
gdm[3153]: #19 0x00adcd29 in pango_layout_check_lines (layout=0xa2a1a58)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-layout.c:3825
gdm[3153]: #20 0x00ade22b in pango_layout_get_extents_internal
(layout=0xa2a1a58, 
gdm[3153]:     ink_rect=0x0, logical_rect=0xbfa738d0, line_extents=0x0)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-layout.c:2444
gdm[3153]: #21 0x00adfdfe in pango_layout_get_pixel_extents (layout=0xa2a1a58, 
gdm[3153]:     ink_rect=0x0, logical_rect=0xbfa738d0) at pango-layout.c:2648
gdm[3153]: #22 0x072474c6 in get_size (cell=0xa04cd60, widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, layout=0xa2a1a58, x_offset=0xbfa7395c, 
gdm[3153]:     y_offset=0xbfa73958, width=0x0, height=0x0) at
gtkcellrenderertext.c:1542
gdm[3153]: #23 0x072478cc in gtk_cell_renderer_text_render (cell=0xa04cd60, 
gdm[3153]:     window=0xa252460, widget=0xa1d65d0, background_area=0xbfa73a98, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, expose_area=0xbfa73ab8, flags=0)
gdm[3153]:     at gtkcellrenderertext.c:1631
gdm[3153]: #24 0x0723f8f0 in IA__gtk_cell_renderer_render (cell=0xa04cd60, 
gdm[3153]:     window=0xa252460, widget=0xa1d65d0, background_area=0xbfa73a98, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, expose_area=0xbfa73ab8, flags=<value
optimized out>)
gdm[3153]:     at gtkcellrenderer.c:578
gdm[3153]: #25 0x07428c2d in gtk_tree_view_column_cell_process_action (
gdm[3153]:     tree_column=<value optimized out>, window=<value optimized out>, 
gdm[3153]:     background_area=0xbfa73ca8, cell_area=0xbfa73c98, flags=0,
action=0, 
gdm[3153]: ditable_widget=0x0, 
gdm[3153]:     event=0x0, path_string=0x0) at gtktreeviewcolumn.c:2802
gdm[3153]: #26 0x0742981c in _gtk_tree_view_column_cell_render
(tree_column=0xa1bf448, 
gdm[3153]:     window=0xa252460, background_area=0xbfa73ca8,
cell_area=0xbfa73c98, 
gdm[3153]:     expose_area=0xbfa74234, flags=0) at gtktreeviewcolumn.c:3135
gdm[3153]: #27 0x074235c9 in gtk_tree_view_bin_expose (widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     event=<value optimized out>) at gtktreeview.c:4719
gdm[3153]: #28 0x07424e3a in gtk_tree_view_expose (widget=0xa1d65d0,
event=0xbfa74228)
gdm[3153]:     at gtktreeview.c:4959
gdm[3153]: #29 0x07304738 in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]:     invocation_hint=0xbfa73f80, marshal_data=0x7424d40) at
gtkmarshalers.c:84
gdm[3153]: #30 0x005e79f9 in g_type_class_meta_marshal (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]:     invocation_hint=0xbfa73f80, marshal_data=0xc8) at gclosure.c:878
gdm[3153]: #31 0x005e9382 in IA__g_closure_invoke (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]:     invocation_hint=0xbfa73f80) at gclosure.c:767
gdm[3153]: #32 0x005ffd47 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0xa020610, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=<value optimized out>, instance=0xa1d65d0, 
gdm[3153]:     emission_return=0xbfa740dc, instance_and_params=0xa664aa0)
gdm[3153]:     at gsignal.c:3282
gdm[3153]: #33 0x006012d0 in IA__g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0xa1d65d0,
signal_id=40, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=0, var_args=0xbfa74140 "lA??\b?\001\n??[") at
gsignal.c:2987
gdm[3153]: #34 0x006018c6 in IA__g_signal_emit (instance=0xa1d65d0,
signal_id=40, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=0) at gsignal.c:3034
gdm[3153]: #35 0x07438cfe in gtk_widget_event_internal (widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     event=0xbfa74228) at gtkwidget.c:4761
gdm[3153]: #36 0x072fd7b0 in IA__gtk_main_do_event (event=0xbfa74228) at
gtkmain.c:1558
gdm[3153]: #37 0x0014b031 in gdk_window_process_updates_internal
(window=0xa252460)
gdm[3153]:     at gdkwindow.c:2595
gdm[3153]: #38 0x0014ba37 in IA__gdk_window_process_all_updates () at
gdkwindow.c:2661
gdm[3153]: #39 0x0014ba5b in gdk_window_update_idle (data=0x0) at
gdkwindow.c:2505
gdm[3153]: #40 0x0012ee98 in gdk_threads_dispatch (data=0xa5b9dc0) at gdk.c:498
gdm[3153]: #41 0x005122f1 in g_idle_dispatch (source=0xa2a2528, callback=0, 
gdm[3153]:     user_data=0xa5b9dc0) at gmain.c:3922
gdm[3153]: #42 0x00514198 in g_main_dispatch (context=<value optimized out>)
gdm[3153]:     at gmain.c:1814
gdm[3153]: #43 IA__g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x9fe7ca0) at gmain.c:2367
gdm[3153]: #44 0x005177a8 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x9fe7ca0, 
gdm[3153]:     block=<value optimized out>, dispatch=1, self=0x9fe3c10) at
gmain.c:2448
gdm[3153]: #45 0x00517c5f in IA__g_main_loop_run (loop=0xa1cb2d8) at
gmain.c:2656
gdm[3153]: #46 0x072fda39 in IA__gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:1205
gdm[3153]: #47 0x080531c5 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfa745c4) at
greeter-main.c:267
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: Thread 1 (Thread 0xb805d720 (LWP 3141)):
gdm[3153]: #0  0x004d02ce in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
gdm[3153]: No symbol table info available.
gdm[3153]: #1  0x0806f6a9 in crashlogger_get_backtrace () at
gdm-signal-handler.c:192
gdm[3153]:         estatus = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: #2  gdm_signal_handler_backtrace () at gdm-signal-handler.c:219
gdm[3153]: st_mode = 33261, 
gdm[3153]: __pad2 = 0, 
gdm[3153]: st_blocks = 16, st_atim = {
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: __unused5 = 0}
gdm[3153]: #3  0x0806f7a1 in signal_handler (signo=-1079564500)
gdm[3153]:     at gdm-signal-handler.c:247
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #4  <signal handler called>
gdm[3153]: No symbol table info available.
gdm[3153]: #5  IA__g_logv (log_domain=<value optimized out>, 
gdm[3153]:     log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, 
gdm[3153]:     format=0x572395 "%s: assertion `%s' failed", args1=0xbfa7318c
"JJa")
gdm[3153]:     at gmessages.c:503
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         domain = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         data = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         log_func = 0x4a32c0
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         i = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: #6  0x0051e686 in IA__g_log (log_domain=0x61313c "GLib-GObject", 
gdm[3153]:     log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, 
gdm[3153]:     format=0x572395 "%s: assertion `%s' failed") at gmessages.c:517
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #7  0x0051e8eb in IA__g_return_if_fail_warning (
gdm[3153]:     log_domain=0x61313c "GLib-GObject", 
gdm[3153]:     pretty_function=0x614a4a "g_object_unref", 
gdm[3153]:     expression=0x613d12 "G_IS_OBJECT (object)") at gmessages.c:532
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #8  0x005eb57c in IA__g_object_unref (_object=0x0) at gobject.c:2371
gdm[3153]:         object = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         old_ref = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #9  0x001c6738 in pango_fc_fontset_finalize (object=0xa569878)
gdm[3153]:     at pangofc-fontmap.c:842
gdm[3153]:         fontset = 0xa569878
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #10 0x005eb693 in IA__g_object_unref (_object=0xa569878) at
gobject.c:2421
gdm[3153]:         object = 0xa569878
gdm[3153]:         old_ref = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #11 0x00505cd4 in g_hash_table_remove_node (hash_table=0xa04ba90, 
gdm[3153]:     node=0xa65d584, notify=1) at ghash.c:335
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #12 0x005073dc in g_hash_table_remove_internal
(hash_table=0xa04ba90, 
gdm[3153]:     key=<value optimized out>, notify=1) at ghash.c:980
gdm[3153]:         node = 0x2
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #13 0x001c6f10 in pango_fc_fontset_cache (fcfontmap=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     fontset=<value optimized out>) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1619
gdm[3153]:         priv = 0xa007438
gdm[3153]:         cache = 0xa052120
gdm[3153]: #14 pango_fc_font_map_load_fontset (fontmap=0xa007418,
context=0xa1e7660, 
gdm[3153]:     desc=0xa61e260, language=0xa5b1004) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1656
gdm[3153]:         priv = 0xa007438
gdm[3153]:         fontset = 0xa569768
gdm[3153]:         key = {fontmap = 0xa007418, language = 0xa5b1004, desc =
0xa4e9b80, 
gdm[3153]: y0 = 0}, 
gdm[3153]: resolution = 96.24609375, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #15 0x00ad5eca in pango_font_map_load_fontset (fontmap=0xa007418, 
gdm[3153]:     context=0xa1e7660, desc=0xa61e260, language=0xa5b1004)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-fontmap.c:138
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #16 0x00ad3a4c in itemize_state_update_for_new_run (
gdm[3153]:     state=<value optimized out>) at pango-context.c:1288
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #17 itemize_state_process_run (state=0xbfa734e4) at
pango-context.c:1327
gdm[3153]:         p = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         last_was_forced_break = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #18 0x00ad3f7f in pango_itemize_with_base_dir (context=0xa1e7660, 
gdm[3153]:     base_dir=PANGO_DIRECTION_LTR, text=0xa2a1260 "Gaeilge
(?\211ire)", 
gdm[3153]:     start_index=0, length=15, attrs=0xa1e4f80,
cached_iter=0xa5ae1d0)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-context.c:1466
gdm[3153]: text = 0xa2a1260 "Gaeilge (?\211ire)", 
gdm[3153]: run_start = 0xa2a1260 "Gaeilge (?\211ire)", 
gdm[3153]: , result = 0x0, item = 0x0, 
gdm[3153]: embedding_end_offset = 14, 
gdm[3153]: embedding = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: , 
gdm[3153]: , 
gdm[3153]: , 
gdm[3153]: centered_baseline = 0, 
gdm[3153]: attr_end = 0xa2a126f "", 
gdm[3153]:           font_desc = 0xa61e260, lang = 0xa5b1004, extra_attrs =
0x0, 
gdm[3153]: changed = 31, script_iter = 0xa7b2000, 
gdm[3153]: script = PANGO_SCRIPT_LATIN, 
gdm[3153]:           derived_lang = 0xa5b1004, lang_engine = 0x0, current_fonts
= 0x0, 
gdm[3153]: enable_fallback = 1, 
gdm[3153]: fallback_engines = 0x0}
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #19 0x00adcd29 in pango_layout_check_lines (layout=0xa2a1a58)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-layout.c:3825
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         attrs = 0xa1e4f80
gdm[3153]:         no_shape_attrs = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         iter = 0xa5ae1d0
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: remaining_height = -1, attrs = 0xa1e4f80, 
gdm[3153]: line_of_par = 13384072, 
gdm[3153]: start_offset = 13371334, properties = {
gdm[3153]: strikethrough = 13570424, 
gdm[3153]: shape_set = 24, 
gdm[3153]: shape_logical_rect = 0xd044ea}, 
gdm[3153]: log_widths_offset = 170529376, 
gdm[3153]: line_start_offset = 13656336, 
gdm[3153]: remaining_width = 167790624}
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #20 0x00ade22b in pango_layout_get_extents_internal
(layout=0xa2a1a58, 
gdm[3153]:     ink_rect=0x0, logical_rect=0xbfa738d0, line_extents=0x0)
gdm[3153]:     at pango-layout.c:2444
gdm[3153]:         line_list = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         y_offset = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         width = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         need_width = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #21 0x00adfdfe in pango_layout_get_pixel_extents (layout=0xa2a1a58, 
gdm[3153]:     ink_rect=0x0, logical_rect=0xbfa738d0) at pango-layout.c:2648
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #22 0x072474c6 in get_size (cell=0xa04cd60, widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, layout=0xa2a1a58, x_offset=0xbfa7395c, 
gdm[3153]:     y_offset=0xbfa73958, width=0x0, height=0x0) at
gtkcellrenderertext.c:1542
gdm[3153]: width = 175842832, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #23 0x072478cc in gtk_cell_renderer_text_render (cell=0xa04cd60, 
gdm[3153]:     window=0xa252460, widget=0xa1d65d0, background_area=0xbfa73a98, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, expose_area=0xbfa73ab8, flags=0)
gdm[3153]:     at gtkcellrenderertext.c:1631
gdm[3153]:         layout = 0xa2a1a58
gdm[3153]:         state = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         x_offset = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         y_offset = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         priv = 0xa04cdc8
gdm[3153]: #24 0x0723f8f0 in IA__gtk_cell_renderer_render (cell=0xa04cd60, 
gdm[3153]: 60, widget=0xa1d65d0, background_area=0xbfa73a98, 
gdm[3153]:     cell_area=0xbfa73aa8, expose_area=0xbfa73ab8, flags=<value
optimized out>)
gdm[3153]:     at gtkcellrenderer.c:578
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #25 0x07428c2d in gtk_tree_view_column_cell_process_action (
gdm[3153]:     tree_column=<value optimized out>, window=<value optimized out>, 
gdm[3153]:     background_area=0xbfa73ca8, cell_area=0xbfa73c98, flags=0,
action=0, 
gdm[3153]: editable_widget=0x0, 
gdm[3153]:     event=0x0, path_string=0x0) at gtktreeviewcolumn.c:2802
gdm[3153]:         info = 0xa2a3858
gdm[3153]:         list = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: height = 23}
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         full_requested_width = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         max_y = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         first_cell = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: height = 21}
gdm[3153]: height = 25}
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #26 0x0742981c in _gtk_tree_view_column_cell_render
(tree_column=0xa1bf448, 
gdm[3153]:     window=0xa252460, background_area=0xbfa73ca8,
cell_area=0xbfa73c98, 
gdm[3153]:     expose_area=0xbfa74234, flags=0) at gtktreeviewcolumn.c:3135
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #27 0x074235c9 in gtk_tree_view_bin_expose (widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     event=<value optimized out>) at gtktreeview.c:4719
gdm[3153]:         column = 0xa1bf448
gdm[3153]:         detail = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         tree_view = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         path = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         tree = 0xa4236c8
gdm[3153]:         list = 0xa1e7c50
gdm[3153]:         node = 0xa47c900
gdm[3153]:         cursor = 0xa444640
gdm[3153]:         cursor_tree = 0xa4236c8
gdm[3153]:         drag_highlight = 0x0
gdm[3153]: _highlight_tree = 0x0
gdm[3153]: stamp = 777744781, user_data = 0xa4228b0, 
gdm[3153]: user_data3 = 0x0}
gdm[3153]:         new_y = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         cell_offset = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: height = 25}
gdm[3153]: height = 23}
gdm[3153]:         flags = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         cursor_path = 0xa5e8b50
gdm[3153]:         drag_dest_path = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         first_column = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         last_column = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         n_visible_columns = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #28 0x07424e3a in gtk_tree_view_expose (widget=0xa1d65d0,
event=0xbfa74228)
gdm[3153]:     at gtktreeview.c:4959
gdm[3153]:         retval = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         tmp_list = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         tree_view = 0xa1d65d0
gdm[3153]: #29 0x07304738 in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]: vocation_hint=0xbfa73f80, marshal_data=0x7424d40) at
gtkmarshalers.c:84
gdm[3153]:         data1 = 0xa1d65d0
gdm[3153]:         data2 = 0xa01d508
gdm[3153]:         v_return = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #30 0x005e79f9 in g_type_class_meta_marshal (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]:     invocation_hint=0xbfa73f80, marshal_data=0xc8) at gclosure.c:878
gdm[3153]:         callback = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: #31 0x005e9382 in IA__g_closure_invoke (closure=0xa020510, 
gdm[3153]:     return_value=0xbfa73f94, n_param_values=2,
param_values=0xa664aa0, 
gdm[3153]:     invocation_hint=0xbfa73f80) at gclosure.c:767
gdm[3153]:         marshal = 0x5e79b0 <g_type_class_meta_marshal>
gdm[3153]:         marshal_data = 0xc8
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #32 0x005ffd47 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0xa020610, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=<value optimized out>, instance=0xa1d65d0, 
gdm[3153]:     emission_return=0xbfa740dc, instance_and_params=0xa664aa0)
gdm[3153]:     at gsignal.c:3282
gdm[3153]:         accumulator = 0xa020498
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: run_type = G_SIGNAL_RUN_LAST}, 
gdm[3153]: chain_type = 167824944}
gdm[3153]:         class_closure = 0xa020510
gdm[3153]:         handler_list = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         return_accu = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: v_long = 0, 
gdm[3153]: v_float = 0, 
gdm[3153]: v_uint = 0, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: v_pointer = 0x0}}}
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #33 0x006012d0 in IA__g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0xa1d65d0,
signal_id=40, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=0, var_args=0xbfa74140 "lA??\b?\001\n??[") at
gsignal.c:2987
gdm[3153]: v_uint = 0, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: v_int = 0, 
gdm[3153]: v_uint64 = 0, 
gdm[3153]: v_pointer = 0x0}}}
gdm[3153]:         error = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         node = 0xa020610
gdm[3153]:         i = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #34 0x006018c6 in IA__g_signal_emit (instance=0xa1d65d0,
signal_id=40, 
gdm[3153]:     detail=0) at gsignal.c:3034
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #35 0x07438cfe in gtk_widget_event_internal (widget=<value optimized
out>, 
gdm[3153]:     event=0xbfa74228) at gtkwidget.c:4761
gdm[3153]:         signal_num = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #36 0x072fd7b0 in IA__gtk_main_do_event (event=0xbfa74228) at
gtkmain.c:1558
gdm[3153]:         event_widget = 0xa1d65d0
gdm[3153]:         grab_widget = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         window_group = 0xa1dbc70
gdm[3153]:         rewritten_event = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         tmp_list = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #37 0x0014b031 in gdk_window_process_updates_internal
(window=0xa252460)
gdm[3153]:     at gdkwindow.c:2595
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0'}, expose = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: height = 28}, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0'}, visibility = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: time = 0, 
gdm[3153]: y = 3.9970550977703557e-260, 
gdm[3153]: is_hint = -32184, 
gdm[3153]: x_root = 2.8801970856796384e-308, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: time = 0, 
gdm[3153]: y = 3.9970550977703557e-260, 
gdm[3153]: button = 167805512, 
gdm[3153]: x_root = 2.8801970856796384e-308, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: time = 0, 
gdm[3153]: y = 3.9970550977703557e-260, 
gdm[3153]: direction = 1819400, device = 0xa008248, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: state = 517, 
gdm[3153]: string = 0xa13aa80 "\002", 
gdm[3153]: is_modifier = 0}, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, window = 0xa252460, 
gdm[3153]: time = 517, 
gdm[3153]: y = 8.3527228199041815e-316, 
gdm[3153]: y_root = -0.045429469319178906, 
gdm[3153]: focus = 167789232, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: in = 2558}, configure = {
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: height = 28}, property = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: state = 462}, selection = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: time = 28, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: reason = 517, 
gdm[3153]: selection_time = 169060992}, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, window = 0xa252460, 
gdm[3153]: device = 0x205}, client = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: data_format = 517, data = {
gdm[3153]: 28, 
gdm[3153]: type = GDK_EXPOSE, 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: y_root = 0}, window_state = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: new_window_state = 517}, setting = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: , 
gdm[3153]: , grab_broken = {
gdm[3153]: send_event = 0 '\0', 
gdm[3153]: grab_window = 0x1ce}}
gdm[3153]: height = 545}
gdm[3153]:         expose_region = 0xa5aee20
gdm[3153]:         window_region = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #38 0x0014ba37 in IA__gdk_window_process_all_updates () at
gdkwindow.c:2661
gdm[3153]:         old_update_windows = 0xa5e9480
gdm[3153]:         tmp_list = 0xa5e9480
gdm[3153]: #39 0x0014ba5b in gdk_window_update_idle (data=0x0) at
gdkwindow.c:2505
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #40 0x0012ee98 in gdk_threads_dispatch (data=0xa5b9dc0) at gdk.c:498
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #41 0x005122f1 in g_idle_dispatch (source=0xa2a2528, callback=0, 
gdm[3153]:     user_data=0xa5b9dc0) at gmain.c:3922
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #42 0x00514198 in g_main_dispatch (context=<value optimized out>)
gdm[3153]:     at gmain.c:1814
gdm[3153]:         dispatch = 0x5122d0 <g_idle_dispatch>
gdm[3153]:         user_data = 0xa5b9dc0
gdm[3153]:         callback = 0x12ee30 <gdk_threads_dispatch>
gdm[3153]:         cb_funcs = 0x5be65c
gdm[3153]:         cb_data = 0xa24ffb8
gdm[3153]: next = 0x0}
gdm[3153]:         source = 0xa2a2528
gdm[3153]:         current = 0xa03e8e0
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #43 IA__g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x9fe7ca0) at gmain.c:2367
gdm[3153]: No locals.
gdm[3153]: #44 0x005177a8 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x9fe7ca0, 
gdm[3153]:     block=<value optimized out>, dispatch=1, self=0x9fe3c10) at
gmain.c:2448
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]:         nfds = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         allocated_nfds = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         fds = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #45 0x00517c5f in IA__g_main_loop_run (loop=0xa1cb2d8) at
gmain.c:2656
gdm[3153]:         self = 0x9fe3c10
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: #46 0x072fda39 in IA__gtk_main () at gtkmain.c:1205
gdm[3153]:         tmp_list = 0xbfa75fab
gdm[3153]:         functions = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         init = 0x8052db0
gdm[3153]:         loop = 0xa1cb2d8
gdm[3153]: #47 0x080531c5 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfa745c4) at
greeter-main.c:267
gdm[3153]:         error = 0x0
gdm[3153]:         session = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         res = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]:         signal_handler = <value optimized out>
gdm[3153]: 
gdm[3153]: The program is running.  Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n)
[answered Y; input not from terminal]
gdm[3153]: ******************* END **********************************

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ajax at fedoraproject.org  Thu Feb 26 22:31:12 2009
From: ajax at fedoraproject.org (Adam Jackson)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel xorg-x11-fonts.spec,1.28,1.29
Message-ID: <20090226223112.34FFB70133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: ajax

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32360

Modified Files:
	xorg-x11-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
* Thu Feb 26 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 7.2-8
- Yet another rebuild attempt.



Index: xorg-x11-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xorg-x11-fonts/devel/xorg-x11-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29
--- xorg-x11-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 11:29:58 -0000	1.28
+++ xorg-x11-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 22:30:41 -0000	1.29
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 Summary:	X.Org X11 fonts
 Name:		xorg-x11-fonts
 Version:	7.2
-Release:	7%{?dist}
+Release:	8%{?dist}
 License:	MIT and Lucida and Public Domain
 Group:		User Interface/X
 URL:		http://www.x.org
@@ -1158,6 +1158,9 @@
 %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_x11fontdir}/cyrillic/fonts.cache-*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> 7.2-8
+- Yet another rebuild attempt.
+
 * Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 7.2-7
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 22:53:05 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:53:05 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480477-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902262253.n1QMr5UI005470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477


Ville Skytt? <ville.skytta at iki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |20081124-5
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Feb 26 22:53:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:53:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902262253.n1QMr6Ke005496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480477, which changed state.

Bug 480477 Summary: [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 27 07:35:18 2009
From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:35:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonttools/devel fonttools.spec,1.16,1.17
Message-ID: <20090227073518.8F4527010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: roozbeh

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3075

Modified Files:
	fonttools.spec 
Log Message:
* Wed Feb 25 2009 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> - 2.2-5
* Change dependency on python-numeric to numpy



Index: fonttools.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonttools/devel/fonttools.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- fonttools.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:54:42 -0000	1.16
+++ fonttools.spec	27 Feb 2009 07:34:48 -0000	1.17
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 Name:           fonttools
 Version:        2.2
-Release:        4%{?dist}
+Release:        5%{?dist}
 Summary:        A tool to convert True/OpenType fonts to XML and back
 
 Group:          Development/Tools
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
 Source0:        http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 
-BuildRequires:  python-devel python-numeric
-Requires:       python-numeric
+BuildRequires:  python-devel numpy
+Requires:       numpy
 
 Provides:       ttx = %{version}-%{release}
 
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 25 2009 Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh at gmail.com> - 2.2-5
+* Change dependency on python-numeric to numpy
+
 * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.2-4
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 



From pl at openoffice.org  Fri Feb 27 12:40:46 2009
From: pl at openoffice.org (pl at openoffice.org)
Date: 27 Feb 2009 12:40:46 -0000
Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement
 table
In-Reply-To: <iz98139@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090227124046.21623.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139


User pl changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|VERIFIED                  |CLOSED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from pl at openoffice.org Fri Feb 27 12:40:45 +0000 2009 -------
integrated in OOO310m1,DEV300m42, closing

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From danken at fedoraproject.org  Fri Feb 27 15:01:48 2009
From: danken at fedoraproject.org (Dan Kenigsberg)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:01:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel .cvsignore, 1.2,
	1.3 fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090227150148.9F38C7010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: danken

Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26799

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec sources 
Log Message:
rename package to culmus-fancy and follow other font packaging guidelines



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore	22 Nov 2005 22:31:38 -0000	1.2
+++ .cvsignore	27 Feb 2009 15:01:18 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,3 +5,10 @@
 gladia.tar.gz
 ktav-yad.tar.gz
 ozrad.tar.gz
+62-culmus-fancy-anka.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-comix-no2.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-dorian.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-gan.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-gladia.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-ktav-yad.conf
+62-culmus-fancy-ozrad.conf


Index: fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec	24 Feb 2009 17:53:41 -0000	1.6
+++ fonts-hebrew-fancy.spec	27 Feb 2009 15:01:18 -0000	1.7
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
-%define culmus_version 0.101
+%define fontname culmus-fancy
+%define fontconf 62-%{fontname}
 
-Name: fonts-hebrew-fancy
+%define common_desc \
+The %{name} package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts \
+from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh.
+
+Name: %{fontname}-fonts
 Version: 0.20051122
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
 License: GPLv2
 Source0: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/comix.tar.gz
 Source1: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/dorian.tar.gz
@@ -11,21 +16,143 @@
 Source4: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/ktav-yad.tar.gz
 Source5: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/ozrad.tar.gz
 Source6: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy/anka.tar.gz
+Source10: %{fontconf}-comix-no2.conf
+Source11: %{fontconf}-dorian.conf
+Source12: %{fontconf}-gan.conf
+Source13: %{fontconf}-gladia.conf
+Source14: %{fontconf}-ktav-yad.conf
+Source15: %{fontconf}-ozrad.conf
+Source16: %{fontconf}-anka.conf
 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+
 BuildArch: noarch
+BuildRequires:  fontpackages-devel
 Group: User Interface/X
 Summary: Fancy fonts for Hebrew
 Summary(he): ???????????? ?????????????? ????????????
 URL: http://culmus.sourceforge.net/fancy
  
 %description
-The fonts-hebrew-fancy package contains fancy (non-standard) Hebrew fonts 
-from the Culmus project by Maxim Iorsh.
+%common_desc
 
 %description -l he
-???????????? fonts-hebrew-fancy ?????????? ???????????? ?????????????? (???? ??????????????????) ????????????,
+???????????? %{name} ?????????? ???????????? ?????????????? (???? ??????????????????) ????????????,
 ?????????????? ???????????? ???? ?????????? ????????.
 
+%package common 
+Summary:        Common files of culmus-fancy-fonts 
+Group:          User Interface/X 
+Requires:       fontpackages-filesystem 
+ 
+%description common 
+%common_desc 
+ 
+This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. 
+
+%package -n fonts-hebrew-fancy-compat
+Summary:          Compatibility files of Culmus fancy font families.
+Group:            User Interface/X
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-dorian-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-gan-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-gladia-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes:         %{fontname}-anka-fonts < %{version}-%{release}
+
+Requires:         %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-dorian-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-gan-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-gladia-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+Requires:         %{fontname}-anka-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
+
+Obsoletes:         fonts-hebrew-fancy < %{version}-%{release}
+Provides:          fonts-hebrew-fancy = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n fonts-hebrew-fancy-compat
+%common_desc
+Meta-package for installing all fancy font families of Culmus.
+This package only exists to help transition fonts-hebrew-fancy users to the new
+package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please
+do not reference it or depend on it in any way.
+
+%files -n fonts-hebrew-fancy-compat
+%{nil}
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n comix-no2 -f %{fontconf}-comix-no2.conf ComixNo2CLM-*.afm ComixNo2CLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-dorian-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-dorian-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n dorian -f %{fontconf}-dorian.conf DorianCLM-*.afm DorianCLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-gan-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-gan-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n gan -f %{fontconf}-gan.conf GanCLM-*.afm GanCLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-gladia-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-gladia-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n gladia -f %{fontconf}-gladia.conf GladiaCLM-*.afm GladiaCLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n ktav-yad -f %{fontconf}-ktav-yad.conf KtavYadCLM-*.afm KtavYadCLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n ozrad -f %{fontconf}-ozrad.conf OzradCLM-*.afm OzradCLM-*.pfa
+
+%package -n %{fontname}-anka-fonts
+Summary:        Fancy Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
+Group:          User Interface/X
+Requires:       %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-anka-fonts
+%common_desc
+
+%_font_pkg -n anka -f %{fontconf}-anka.conf AnkaCLM-*.afm AnkaCLM-*.pfa
+
 %prep
 %setup -c
 %setup -T -D -a 1
@@ -36,38 +163,37 @@
 %setup -T -D -a 6
 
 %install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -fr %{buildroot}
 
-mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy
-cp *.pfa *.afm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy
-# %%ghost the fonts.cache-1 file
-touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/fonts.cache-{1,2}
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.afm %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+install -m 0644 -p *.pfa %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
+
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+                   %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
+
+for c in %{SOURCE10} %{SOURCE11} %{SOURCE12} \
+         %{SOURCE13} %{SOURCE14} %{SOURCE15}  %{SOURCE16}; do
+  fconf=`basename "$c"`
+  install -m 0644 -p $c \
+            %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/"$fconf"
+  ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
+        %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+done
 
 %clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
 
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-  %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy
-fi
-
-%postun
-if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then
-  if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then
-    %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts
-  fi
-fi
-
-%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%files common
+%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
 %doc GNU-GPL
-%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy
-%{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/*.pfa
-%{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/*.afm
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/fonts.cache-1
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/hebrew-fancy/fonts.cache-2
+
+%dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 27 2009 Dan Kenigsberg <danken at cs.technion.ac.il> 0.20051122-6
+- Follow new font packaging guidelines.
+
 * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.20051122-5
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fonts-hebrew-fancy/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources	22 Nov 2005 22:31:38 -0000	1.2
+++ sources	27 Feb 2009 15:01:18 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,3 +5,10 @@
 34c72b7ee66d38baddae31998000678c  gladia.tar.gz
 e5e9572e5cbca24c976b8091feeb586f  ktav-yad.tar.gz
 1e3c28c01fc9a7b40fed694a571034cc  ozrad.tar.gz
+0f2535801c221d16d2a6a73da71e5d36  62-culmus-fancy-anka.conf
+f231a26dbf1c882fb18d1d48b3c60adc  62-culmus-fancy-comix-no2.conf
+6ff29dc95f8cf4a063139554b7e31a1f  62-culmus-fancy-dorian.conf
+24468acc5927297e1b9f50759f3ce875  62-culmus-fancy-gan.conf
+49f334dcec45bab31c43c00dd8e06f56  62-culmus-fancy-gladia.conf
+f42cf94f2eb13295bebef866ee851741  62-culmus-fancy-ktav-yad.conf
+4cacccb4935129fba71cc18e14b29d08  62-culmus-fancy-ozrad.conf



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 27 08:12:28 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:12:28 -0500
Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after
 vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed
In-Reply-To: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-485562-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902270812.n1R8CSvj025505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562


Yuta Kitamura <kee at ketan.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(kee at ketan.jp)     |




--- Comment #11 from Yuta Kitamura <kee at ketan.jp>  2009-02-27 03:12:27 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=333444)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333444)
Test case after cjkunifonts-uming package updated

OK, here's a screenshot. It seems that everything is working flawlessly.

Just FYI, I've updated only cjkunifonts-uming package, because it's the only
package of cjkunifonts-* series installed in my box.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 27 17:26:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:26:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings
In-Reply-To: <bug-480455-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480455-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902271726.n1RHQKB7013561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455


Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-02-27 12:26:19 EDT ---
So, in this case, an hardcoded font is used in a demo program (ftgl-utils)
It aimed to demonstrate ftgl is working. It could probably be coded more
accurately and I will forward the problem upstream.

Until then, I've switch from freefont to /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
from the dejavu-sans-fonts package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Feb 27 17:26:22 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:26:22 -0500
Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines
In-Reply-To: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-480443-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902271726.n1RHQMFo013588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443


Bug 480443 depends on bug 480455, which changed state.

Bug 480455 Summary: [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From john_jason_jordan at openoffice.org  Fri Feb 27 18:32:32 2009
From: john_jason_jordan at openoffice.org (john_jason_jordan at openoffice.org)
Date: 27 Feb 2009 18:32:32 -0000
Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF
 export and printing
In-Reply-To: <iz43029@qa.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090227183232.18908.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029





------- Additional comments from john_jason_jordan at openoffice.org Fri Feb 27 18:32:27 +0000 2009 -------
I just noticed that using OpenType fonts with PostScript outlines on Linux will
not be in 3.1. I have given this issue 2 votes. I am not a programmer so I can't
help with the code necessary to implement this, but is there anything else I can
do? Money? Bribes? A .357 magnum? I'll do anything I can to help.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 03:14:53 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:14:53 -0500
Subject: [Bug 487593] crash changing language in gdm
In-Reply-To: <bug-487593-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-487593-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280314.n1S3ErwD030261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593


Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aalam at redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com>  2009-02-27 22:14:51 EDT ---
*** Bug 487259 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 03:26:20 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:26:20 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280326.n1S3QK0t003660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-27 22:26:19 EDT ---
bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 03:28:02 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:02 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3S2uR001506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865





--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2009-02-27 22:28:01 EDT ---
bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 03:28:06 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:06 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3S6An001545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|20090205-5.fc10             |20090205-5.fc9




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 03:26:24 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:26:24 -0500
Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-483865-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280326.n1S3QOoP001130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |20090205-5.fc10
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 06:04:04 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:04:04 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902280604.n1S644Cf024960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-28 01:04:04 EDT ---
It was enabling the python bindings. When those are enabled, it assumes
python... 

passing it '-lang=ff' causes it to use the 'legacy' fontforge scripting lang. 

Will get this imported and built now. 

Does the fontconfig file I have here look ok?

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: levien-inconsolata-fonts
Short Description: A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like,
in print
Owners: kevin
Branches: devel
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From ousia at openoffice.org  Sat Feb 28 13:14:51 2009
From: ousia at openoffice.org (ousia at openoffice.org)
Date: 28 Feb 2009 13:14:51 -0000
Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF
 export and printing
In-Reply-To: <iz43029@www.openoffice.org>
Message-ID: <20090228131451.4845.qmail@openoffice.org>

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029





------- Additional comments from ousia at openoffice.org Sat Feb 28 13:14:46 +0000 2009 -------
This issue is already 4yo (although the issue 16032 will be 6yo this June, so
the issue is already 5yo).

I don't know how many other issues have more votes than this, but having 237 is
not bad (412 considering the votes for 16032).

Code has been provided to fix the issue, although it needs to be adapted.

Sorry for not being able to code the patch that will fix this issue.

But once the target milestone has been set for release 3.2, please keep it so.
Delay this release as long as it might take to fix the issue, but please, do not
postpone this issue for a latter milestone.

Thanks for your help,


Pablo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification



From oget at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 28 18:30:33 2009
From: oget at fedoraproject.org (Orcan Ogetbil)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2,
	1.3 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3
Message-ID: <20090228183033.A64B570113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: oget

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8479

Modified Files:
	.cvsignore serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec sources 
Log Message:
* Sat Feb 28 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.5.1-1
- New version with cleanups and fixes



Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- .cvsignore	13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000	1.2
+++ .cvsignore	28 Feb 2009 18:30:03 -0000	1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2
+serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1.tar.bz2


Index: serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 00:33:25 -0000	1.2
+++ serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec	28 Feb 2009 18:30:03 -0000	1.3
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 %define archivename %{name}-%{version}
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
-Version:       0.5
-Release:       2%{?dist}
+Version:       0.5.1
+Release:       1%{?dist}
 Summary:       Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts
 Group:         User Interface/X
 License:       GPLv2+
@@ -56,14 +56,17 @@
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Feb 28 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.5.1-1
+- New version with cleanups and fixes
+
 * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.5-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 
-* Tue Jan 13 2009 <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.5-1
+* Tue Jan 13 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.5-1
 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596
 
-* Sun Jan 11 2009 <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.4-1
+* Sun Jan 11 2009 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.4-1
 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon)
 
-* Sun Dec 28 2008 <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.3-1
+* Sun Dec 28 2008 Orcan Ogetbil <oget [DOT] fedora [AT] gmail [DOT] com> - 0.3-1
 - Initial release


Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sources	13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000	1.2
+++ sources	28 Feb 2009 18:30:03 -0000	1.3
@@ -1 +1 @@
-41a8673cb16fe0597eb5ef5c76a8336b  serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2
+bc92c3fa3ba5ce3946d8e6f39ba91aae  serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1.tar.bz2



From slankes at fedoraproject.org  Sat Feb 28 20:05:16 2009
From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/devel sj-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3
Message-ID: <20090228200516.3D9E970113@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com>

Author: slankes

Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28431

Modified Files:
	sj-fonts.spec 
Log Message:
fix ftbfs


Index: sj-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/sj-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- sj-fonts.spec	26 Feb 2009 01:18:28 -0000	1.2
+++ sj-fonts.spec	28 Feb 2009 20:04:45 -0000	1.3
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 Name:          %{fontname}-fonts
 Version:       2.0.2
-Release:       2%{?dist}
+Release:       3%{?dist}
 Summary:       Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL
 
 Group:         User Interface/X
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
 %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version}
 
 %build
-fontforge -script "-" Delphine.sfd SteveHand.sfd <<EOF
+fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" Delphine.sfd SteveHand.sfd <<EOF
 i = 1
 while ( i < \$argc )
   Open (\$argv[i], 1)
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
 %dir %{_fontdir}
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Feb 28 2009 Sven Lankes <sven at lank.es> - 2.0.2-3
+- Adjust fontforge call to fix ftbfs 
+
 * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.2-2
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
 



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Feb 28 23:40:18 2009
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:40:18 -0500
Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata
 fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-486269-236001@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200902282340.n1SNeIO5001467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-28 18:40:16 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.