From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 05:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 00:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901010529.n015TuSw030411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 19:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477055] Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011920.n01JKcib008197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 --- Comment #12 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-01 14:20:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is it possible for rpmdevtools to support replacing of the macro syntax too? I suppose it's _possible_, but I'm not at all sure about the feasibility. The shell style ones can obviously be used only in specfile constructs that are shell code, and replacing macro style ones with them in other sections would cause breakage, and implementing a real specfile parser is not something I even want to think about. For spec templates that are shipped in rpmdevtools I can ensure that no breakage occurs but I can't do that for templates in other packages, such as these new font templates. > Because I know many packagers use the templates as plain text templates too > without use of rpmdevtools automation, and I'd really like the default not to > be the shell variant in that case > > I also have some opinions on this point :p Doh :P. Well, even if it's not a "solution", I suppose educating them to take advantage of the rpmdevtools features wouldn't hurt. > Of course it it's absolutely necessary for rpmdevtools I will change this. It's not "absolutely necessary", but unless changed, it will be a small regression. rpmdevtools 7.0 does not do macros->shell replacement, but it should take care of the -simple/-multi selection, always producing a foo-fonts.spec result, and replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021303.n02D33qg014277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-02 08:03:02 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021312.n02DCpWp016470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kahl 2009-01-02 08:12:50 EDT --- Updates for F-9 and F-10 submitted for testing. Package cannot be built for rawhide right now because of missing F-11 bitstream-vera-fonts, so it seems.. clueless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021440.n02EeqDw015057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-02 09:40:51 EDT --- The font packages in rawhide have been reorganised https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-December/msg00025.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021445.n02EjfQX015954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-02 09:45:40 EDT --- Given the number of problem packages I'll try to get a nagbot sending warnings about misplaces fonts so it'll be more hassle for you not to convert (I think) And 503k is already as big as many of our small packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477482] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021443.n02EhJUX001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477482 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-02 09:43:18 EDT --- It is a good idea to remind upstream they should use fontconfig like everyone else so you don't need to maintain brittle symlinks Nevertheless, this is a separate mid-term bug, as opposed to the short-term symlinking solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 14:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021456.n02EuAEe003866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-02 09:56:10 EDT --- So one subpackage for the /lib/default.ttf, or one each for the ones in the langpacks as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 15:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021512.n02FCXDa007062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kahl 2009-01-02 10:12:32 EDT --- The name of the fonts in the unit test is hardcoded.. I'm trying hard to avoid patching the source file; it seems there are no checks on whether the expected list of files really refers to the Vera family, I could make the symlinks point to the DejaVu family I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 16:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477482] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021630.n02GUUdf020236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477482 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-02 11:30:29 EDT --- Thanks, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 and https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?12810 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 00:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030031.n030Vorr018008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 01:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030107.n031788K023413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivazqueznet at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-01-02 20:07:08 EDT --- GPLv2+ is a bad license for fonts in Fedora. I recommend you find a suitable replacement. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Jan 3 03:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:49:16 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030349.n033nGuf020516@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 468218, which changed state. Bug 468218 Summary: implement @font-face { src:local() } on Linux https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468218 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478634] Have upstream use fontconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030917.n039HGVm024477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478634 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030922.n039M5f9025458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-03 04:22:05 EDT --- Ideally, one per font family. It's not an obligation yet, but the obligation text is already in FPC's queue. But do check with upstream the font origin and licensing. It may be they're not all licensed in a Fedora-compatible way, or that they're already packaged somewhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030923.n039NdJv025637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-03 04:23:38 EDT --- See also https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-December/msg00020.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030928.n039S03R007584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-03 04:27:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > GPLv2+ is a bad license for fonts in Fedora. True. Nevertheless currently we do accept GPL-only fonts in Fedora, as long as their packagers continue to try to locate right holders and add the FSF Font exception to the license. There are just too many GPL-only fonts :( Just don't use them to create PDFs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 09:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 04:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901030942.n039gNIY029068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-03 04:42:22 EDT --- It's worth a try. You could also remind upstream to add fontconfig support so it can auto-discover system fonts like other apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031412.n03ECsBE029356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 14:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031412.n03ECtoR029385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477422, which changed state. Bug 477422 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 15:44:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 10:44:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031544.n03FiEBv012891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-03 10:44:13 EDT --- I have contacted the author and asked about his thoughts on relicensing as GPL + Font Exceptions. Considering that all his websites are down (and have been down for quite a while) I'm not sure the email will ever reach him (at least I haven't received a bounce for it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 17:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478695] New: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478695 Summary: Firefox crashes in pango-hangul-fc.so Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328111) Backtrace from crashed firefox Description of problem: When running wikipedia search in Ctrl-K query dialog in Firefox, firefox crashed with the attached backtrace. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): firefox-3.0.5-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 xulrunner-1.9.0.5-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: happened once -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041002.n04A2m6L029125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:02:44 EDT --- Please adapt to the new guidelines ; that should be easy and simplify your spec quite a bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041006.n04A6r34014356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:06:51 EDT --- Hi Ankur, This looks quite good and you've progressed a lot since your first submissions. However, you need to adapt this spec file to the new templates, like for your other submissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041029.n04ATceP018395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:29:37 EDT --- Thank you for packaging a new font. Initial remarks: ? you should convert to the new Fedora packaging templates. That will make Behdad happy and simplify your spec file quite a bit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template (plain text version in fontpackages-devel) ? please use lowercase package name to keep consistency with other font packages such as dejavu-fonts ? You have more complete fontconfig templates that just need filing in fontpackages-devel (please send them upstream for inclusion in the font archive when you're happy with them) ? please ask upstream to add a detached txt license file, a readme and a fontlog. The OFL is quite specific about stuff like reserved font names, that require documentation in the license text and fontlog ? this font is available in the Open Font Library. Please ask upstream what the canonical home should be. If it is the Open Font Library, add the oflb- prefix to the fontname ? please add a page to the wiki that describes this font and will be referenced in the F11 release notes, using this template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template (see also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle ) ? NEEDINFO while this is being taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041056.n04AuERr006792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sven at lank.es) --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:56:13 EDT --- Hi Sven, Thank you for this new font package! Dustimo is a neat font that suffers from a missing upstream. We'll accept it nevertheless, but please continue to try getting an upstream response even after the package integration (sfd sources, addition of the font exception to the license). Anyway: ? Right now the best font source is probably Debian, as the font was created for this distribution. They have a more current dustimo.zip in their ttf-dustin package (20030318) ? Please make separate sans and sans-serif subpackages using the multi template in fontpackages-devel ? Please add fontconfig declarations to each subpackage. It's not difficult, just fill in the basic template in fontpackages-devel (you can ask for help on the list if you have a problem at some point) ? you don't really need to add an archivename if its value is the same as fontname ? please don't deviate from the template and use the provided macros or we'll have no end of problems lates ? NEEDINFO till this is taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 10:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041059.n04AxoZL024094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 05:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Domestic_manners is currently not on the wishlist - it is here > http://www.urbanfonts.com/fonts/Domestic_Manners.htm So just add a new entry in the wishlist, and package the font :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 11:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 06:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041120.n04BKYW6011751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 06:20:33 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Im not too sure of line 53 : install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I dint quite get that. Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" so there must be something wrong in the "ln ... " command.. line 61. I havent been able to correct that either. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041414.n04EEt71030680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477402, which changed state. Bug 477402 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 14:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 09:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041414.n04EEsbv030655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Andy Shevchenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Andy Shevchenko 2009-01-04 09:14:53 EDT --- As I described in [1] the jack-audio-connection-kit is a good package. Please, fix doxygen instead and feel reopen this bug lately. I can put then requirements of new doxygen package if you want to. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00117.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Jan 4 15:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (doxygen (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 566515] New: Do not include font files in generated doc Message-ID: If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566515 doxygen | general | Ver: 1.5.7.1 Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc Product: doxygen Version: 1.5.7.1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: general AssignedTo: dimitri at stack.nl ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net QAContact: dimitri at stack.nl CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified Doxygen adds font files to the documentation it generates. This pauses problems to distributions as fonts are bulky and can have conflicting legal constraints. Duplicating the same font files in every doxygen-produced documentation just exacerbates the problem. Please stop distributing fonts within doxygen, and let the system manage fonts for you. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402#c2 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566515. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478747] New: Do not include font files in generated doc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478747 Summary: Do not include font files in generated doc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: doxygen AssignedTo: than at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: than at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Doxygen adds font files to the documentation it generates. This pauses problems to Fedora as fonts are bulky and can have conflicting legal constraints. Duplicating the same font files in every doxygen-produced documentation just exacerbates the problem. Please stop distributing fonts within doxygen, and let the system manage fonts for you. See also bug #477402 and the referenced upstream bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041549.n04FngtJ015120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 10:49:41 EDT --- See also http://fpaste.org/paste/694 So the basic update path just works, and something else must be confusing yum or pinning the old conflicting packages on ajax' system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041555.n04FtfK7016311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com Blocks| |182235 Depends on|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley 2009-01-04 10:55:40 EDT --- fixing dependencies as not to bring FE-LEGAL into F11Target :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041607.n04G72i6000733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-01-04 11:07:01 EDT --- Hilariously, I can't upgrade yum (at least not with the rawhide repos enabled) to see if this is fixed already, for much the same reason: python abi change -> inkscape -> poppler -> openoffice -> fonts -> doom. I installed yum-3.2.20-5.fc10 from koji by hand, but it produces the same failure when trying to install rawhide python packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041607.n04G7gSj000798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 11:07:40 EDT --- hi, packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm same warning with the rpm for this package too : "oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf " hope its okay other than that. @pablo : ive just really replaced the "font name" and "generic name" etc in the fontconfig template that nicolas has given. I dont exactly understand it. hope its okay other than that.. regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041609.n04G9tB4018375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 11:09:54 EDT --- dejavu-fonts-compat.noarch should have cleaned up the old dejavu-fonts package and is in the transaction set, so yum is doing something strange -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041616.n04GGuN4002293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477402, which changed state. Bug 477402 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041620.n04GKeFA003083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 11:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > same warning with the rpm for this package too : > "oldstandard-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-oldstandard.conf > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-oldstandard.conf > " You can ignore this warning for now, it's not even sure if we'll keep in in Fedora rpmlint http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041620.n04GK0vg002546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 seth vidal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svidal at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from seth vidal 2009-01-04 11:19:59 EDT --- If a pkg contains files which conflict with another pkg then you have to have a Conflicts: line in the spec file - this is listed in Fedora's Packaging Guidelines. It is nicer b/c it means yum can tell if there is a conflict without having ALL of the file metadata (including checksums). There appears to be a conflict that we cannot upgrade out of. Ajax: have you made any changes to your yum.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041616.n04GGtaV002267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 11:16:54 EDT --- I've filled bug #478747 on doxygen if that makes you feel better, but really, it's an easy fix in your package and there's no reason to postpone the fix till the tools you use are eventually fixed upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041625.n04GPw3o021087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #5 from Adam Jackson 2009-01-04 11:25:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328141) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328141) /etc/yum.conf Not that I'm aware of. yum.conf from the affected machine is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041628.n04GSQH8004204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #6 from Adam Jackson 2009-01-04 11:28:26 EDT --- Well, okay, not in a way that should affect this. installonly_limit is clearly my own doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 16:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041629.n04GTjXg004349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-04 11:29:44 EDT --- hi, packages: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec Gives this error while building packages..During the build using fontforge.."FindMatchinHVEdge didn't" I havent been able to understad what it is..Packages build normally though.. Getting this warning here too with rpmlint : "beteckna-sfd-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-beteckna.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-beteckna.conf" regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041700.n04H0DDq009455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:00:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I > dint quite get that. You did ok, I've tried to clarify the wiki page ping me if it's still unclear > Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: > symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" This is an rpmlint of dubious utility that will be discussed by FPC soonish. In the meanwhile, ignore it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 Please make your fontconfig file adhere more closely to the basic template in fontpackages-devel. Otherwise, everything else seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041700.n04H0a28026757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:00:35 EDT --- . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041710.n04HAshI028588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477402, which changed state. Bug 477402 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041710.n04HArxD028564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Andy Shevchenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.116.1-3.fc11 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andy Shevchenko 2009-01-04 12:10:52 EDT --- I have built new package which doesn't include any font: [root at dhcppc55 ~]# rpm -qlp /home/andy/RPM/RPMS/i386/jack-audio-connection-kit-* | grep -E '.(ttf|pfa|pfb|ofa)$' [root at dhcppc55 ~]# Thanks for report! Koji logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041721.n04HLLGx030411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 12:21:20 EDT --- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041723.n04HN8dB030640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-04 12:23:08 EDT --- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477460] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041729.n04HTqj6031521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-04 12:29:51 EDT --- Because, it's look like, that the stellarium package will contains fontsfile for the DeJaVU-Sans and DEJAVU-SansMono files, it may be right to remove this files from the packabe and add Req. to the dejavu-fonts packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041751.n04HpILP017667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 12:51:16 EDT --- Looks nice so here is a complete review: 1. probably better to use %define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} 2. The summary needs a little work (for example 'Geometric sans-serif font inspired by Futura') 3. you do not need to add "sfd" to the name, renaming is only a requirement for OFL fonts, GPL does not require it 4. beteckna.se seems dead, no need to reference it in the description 5. we already have a licensing field, do not include "The font is free, licensed under terms of the GNU GPL" in the description 6. You're wrapping your description lines too short, Fedora standard is 79 columns not 50 7. do package AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG as %doc too 8. I see beteckna is actually 3 different font families: Beteckna, BetecknaLowerCase, Beteckna Small Caps. Please package them in 3 different subpackages using the -multi template (the two families which do not have a correct uppercase/lowercase mix are probably more "fantasy" than "sans-serif" fonts anyway) 9.[not a blocker] Please ask upstream to consider adding the FSF Font exception to their licensing so the font can be used by people who embed fonts in PDF files 10. Please change the category of the wiki page describing the font so other packagers see they need not work on it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Beteckna_fonts (see the help in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) You do not need a packager sponsorship for this, just a Fedora FAS account Anyway that's all mostly small stuff and nothing that should be too hard for you to fix. ? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041800.n04I0gGZ004353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477460, which changed state. Bug 477460 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477460] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041800.n04I0fKa004332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-04 13:00:40 EDT --- I have try to create such a solution. But stellarium will starts to complaints about missing files, if the fontsfiles are not exists on /usr/share/stellarium/data. Because the packaging policy say, that create a font subpackage make only sense, if other applications may benefits from it, I have avoid this solution, because the dejavu fonts are available for other applications as a existing package of the fedora repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041805.n04I5bk5020534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 13:05:36 EDT --- PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041803.n04I3o8d019945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477460, which changed state. Bug 477460 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477460] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041803.n04I3ovR019921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 13:03:49 EDT --- There's no reason not to fix it, use symlinks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 18:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477460] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041803.n04I3LA7019872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-04 13:03:20 EDT --- If your package only need those two dejavu families, please remove them and add deps on the corresponding dejavu packages. (plus a set of symlinks in your package if stellarium can not find system fonts; in that case also remind upstream to add fontconfig support so you don't need to carry the symlinks forever) Please do so in fedora-devel *only*. Be aware that the set of dejavu packages available in fedora-devel have different names and deps than in F9 and F10, so you need to reference the new names for this stuff to work (probably dejavu-fonts-sans-mono and dejavu-fonts-sans) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041901.n04J1b6Y029967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477460, which changed state. Bug 477460 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477460] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041901.n04J1ad9029946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477460 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-04 14:01:35 EDT --- Bug should be fixed at stellarium-0.10.0-2 at rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041908.n04J8GEc031102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from James Antill 2009-01-04 14:08:15 EDT --- I'm pretty sure this is obsoletes related, not conflict. From a list obsoletes I see: dejavu-fonts-compat.noarch 2.28-1.fc11 rawhide dejavu-fonts-experimental.noarch 2.24-3.fc9 installed dejavu-fonts-compat.noarch 2.28-1.fc11 rawhide dejavu-fonts.noarch 2.24-3.fc9 installed ...my guess is that the 'yum install python-twyt' path is only processing one (or maybe zero) of the above obsoletes. We might have fixed this already in 3.2.20-8 ... but can you run the above install command with "-d 9", as that'll hopefully tell us what obsoletes that single update line is doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041928.n04JSfvg018761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from Adam Jackson 2009-01-04 14:28:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328150) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328150) output of 'yum -d9 install python-twyt' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tessarakt at openoffice.org Sun Jan 4 19:39:58 2009 From: tessarakt at openoffice.org (tessarakt at openoffice.org) Date: 4 Jan 2009 19:39:58 -0000 Subject: [Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090104193958.26272.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User tessarakt changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,nmailhot,|'fedorafonts,hdu,nmailhot, |pagalmes,pl,pmike' |pagalmes,pl,pmike,tessarak | |t' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From tessarakt at openoffice.org Sun Jan 4 19:40:25 2009 From: tessarakt at openoffice.org (tessarakt at openoffice.org) Date: 4 Jan 2009 19:40:25 -0000 Subject: [Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090104194025.26701.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 User tessarakt changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts,hjs,rene' |'fedorafonts,hjs,rene,tess | |arakt' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042131.n04LVrsM022062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sven at lank.es) | --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-04 16:31:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Spec-URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/dustismo-fonts.spec SRPM-URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/dustismo-fonts-20030318-1.fc11.src.rpm Updated SPEC - the spec should address all the issues you listed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Jan 4 21:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 378338] Deal with X servers which misreport the screen's dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090104220000.3C01F23F51E@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338 gnome-control-center | settings-daemon | Ver: trunk soc changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |soc at krg-nw.de ------- Comment #51 from soc 2009-01-04 21:59 UTC ------- I can confirm this. The bug is not fixed in GNOME 2.24.1 (Ubuntu 8.10). -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 00:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050005.n0505gS6031332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #10 from James Antill 2009-01-04 19:05:42 EDT --- Or apply the fix by hand, if you're really feeling lucky:) http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commitdiff;h=f203d754c952c4f117ed8ddbb09dda9ba237dacd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 00:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050004.n0504FvW030889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #9 from James Antill 2009-01-04 19:04:14 EDT --- This should now be fixed in upstream commit: f203d754c952c4f117ed8ddbb09dda9ba237dacd This'll be in 3.2.21 which should be released "soon". Or you can just "yum update deja\*" for the time being. Or you can try "Running an upstream yum-3.2.* locally" instructions from: http://yum.baseurl.org/ ...to get around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 01:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050159.n051xv8k015899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #11 from Adam Jackson 2009-01-04 20:59:56 EDT --- I'm a lucky kind of guy. That fixes it, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 05:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050509.n0559G83016167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477428, which changed state. Bug 477428 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 05:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477428] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050509.n0559GwT016141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-05 00:09:14 EDT --- Added a Requires: bitstream-vera-fonts-sans-mono to munin and a ln to the font there. Should be all fixed in rawhide now. Feel free to re-open or file a new bug if you spot anything wrong with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 06:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 01:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477428] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050659.n056x1SI004017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-05 01:59:00 EDT --- Please consider linking the dejavu version of the same font instead since this one will already be installed on most systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478786] xfig: Can't find -urw-nimbus roman no9 l-medium-r-normal--8-*-*-*-*-*-ISO8859-*, using 6x13 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050902.n0592B98026685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478786 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, than at redhat.com Component|xfig |urw-fonts AssignedTo|skasal at redhat.com |than at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-05 04:02:05 EDT --- This is not an xfig problem then, but an urw-fonts problem, and one which I believe is already fixed, but I'll leave judging that to the urw-fonts maintainer. Changing component and re-assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cmc at openoffice.org Mon Jan 5 09:37:45 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Jan 2009 09:37:45 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090105093745.7182.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|16032,30202 |16032,30202,97765 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cmc at openoffice.org Mon Jan 5 09:38:27 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Jan 2009 09:38:27 -0000 Subject: [Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090105093827.8861.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|2867,43495,81913,82986 |2867,43495,81913,82986,977 is| |65 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050940.n059eRsY017305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050940.n059eSvj017330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434753] Sometimes can't display VLGothic via "sansserif" family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051321.n05DLnOl000764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434753 --- Comment #11 from Makoto Mizukami 2009-01-05 08:21:46 EDT --- Frankly speaking, I cannot represent this issue. I have tested two applications, Adobe's flash and xine-ui. Adobe Flash: This problem didn't occur in both current F10 fontconfig and new F11 fontconfig(however, I think F11 config's appearnce is much better than F10 one, but it's not a problem). xine-ui: Japanese letters didn't displayed at all in both settings. It seems another problem. I give a lot of thanks to your great effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 14:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051457.n05EvMil024546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-05 09:57:20 EDT --- So are you proposing: moodle moodle-fonts moodle-sm moodle-sm-fonts moodle-km moodle-km-fonts moodle-to moodle-to-fonts ? This is acceptable to me, if that's what you mean. Putting them all into one -fonts would mean that every installation would require any language that included fonts, which is highly broken. Maybe I'm misunderstanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Mon Jan 5 17:42:26 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Jan 2009 17:42:26 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090105174226.21236.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |97765 is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 18:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051817.n05IHOSO002534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-05 13:17:23 EDT --- This looks good, a variant on the multi template I hadn't seen before, but it works. Please also consider adding a dustin- prefix to the package name especially if you intend to package more fonts by the same author (This is a proposed guideline which is not official yet, so I won't block on it. However if the guideline is approved you'll earn a renaming later.) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) Anyway, the package is ??? APPROVED ??? You can continue on from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Reassigning as I've done my part. Return review of bug #475661 would be appreciated (wink wink) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477369] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051910.n05JAQx8016383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477369 Lillian Angel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 19:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051910.n05JARrn016409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477369, which changed state. Bug 477369 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477369 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052002.n05K2aT4027359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477370, which changed state. Bug 477370 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052002.n05K2aP2027335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-05 15:02:35 EDT --- Because the font file which was detected by your bot is a hidden file (dot file) it makes not sense to create a seperate subpackage for the fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052028.n05KSvom000383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477370, which changed state. Bug 477370 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052028.n05KSuJH000349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-05 15:28:55 EDT --- Hidden or not that does not change one bit the licensing considerations that made FPC and FESCO adopt the aforementioned guidelines Please adapt your package to them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052042.n05KghSv003835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-05 15:42:42 EDT --- Actually, I think you can simplify your problem considerably. Opening a few moodle fonts in the gnome font preview/in fontforge shows they are either arial narrow (not OK for Fedora licensing wise) or a khmerOS font (already packaged separately) So I suggest you just check each font, see if it's legit for Fedora or already packaged, and report back if you actually find a font in moodle we can ship which is not already packaged somewhere else BTW it's also a good idea to notify upstream they are shipping dubious material licensing-wise Just shows this font audit was really needed :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 20:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052057.n05KvmHw006739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-05 15:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dustin-dustismo-fonts Short Description: General purpose fonts in serif and sans-serif versions Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052116.n05LGQii022952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo: fangqq at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fangqq at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' '*.ttc' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cmc at openoffice.org Mon Jan 5 23:28:14 2009 From: cmc at openoffice.org (cmc at openoffice.org) Date: 5 Jan 2009 23:28:14 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090105232814.15389.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User cmc changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|97765 | is| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 01:22:00 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.22,1.23 Message-ID: <20090106012200.643A770125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17600 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) modified .spec file according to guidelines Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.22 retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23 --- cjkunifonts.spec 7 Dec 2008 09:13:01 -0000 1.22 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:21:29 -0000 1.23 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +%define fontname cjkunifonts +%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} +%define archivename %{name}-%{version} +%define common_desc \ +Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made +available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended +by the CJK Unifonts project. + + %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai %define fcdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d @@ -7,10 +16,9 @@ %define umingbuilddir ../%{name}-uming-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir ../%{name}-ukai-%{version} -Name: cjkunifonts +Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 10.fc11 -#Release: 9.1%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -26,24 +34,25 @@ Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch -BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir %description -Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made -available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended -by the CJK Unifonts project. +%common_desc %package uming Summary: Chinese Uming style face TrueType Font License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 %description uming +%common_desc + Chinese Uming style face TrueType Font derived from the original fonts released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. @@ -51,11 +60,14 @@ Summary: Chinese Ukai style face TrueType font License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 %description ukai +%common_desc + Chinese Ukai style face TrueType Font derived from the original fonts released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. @@ -68,55 +80,59 @@ %{nil} %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} # dirs -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{umingfontdir} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ukaifontdir} +install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +install -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} +install -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} # ttfs -install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{umingfontdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ukaifontdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{umingfontdir} -o $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale -mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{umingfontdir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ukaifontdir} -o $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale -mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ukaifontdir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} -o %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale +mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} -o %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale +mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} # fontconfig config files -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir} -for conf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` +install -d %{buildroot}%{fcdir} +for fconf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{fcdir}/ + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done -for conf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` +for fconf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fcdir}/ + install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{fcdir}/ + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done # backward compat -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf +install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType +install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType +%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf # catalogue -%{__ln_s} %{umingfontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming -%{__ln_s} %{ukaifontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai +%{__ln_s} %{umingfontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +%{__ln_s} %{ukaifontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai # ghostscript -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir} -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ +install -d %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir} +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr ${buildroot} %post uming if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then @@ -143,7 +159,7 @@ fi %files uming -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc %{umingbuilddir}/license %doc %{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc %{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt @@ -174,7 +190,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-uming %files ukai -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/license %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt @@ -199,6 +215,9 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog +* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) + * Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11 - Don't umask before fc-cache. - Add -f to fc-cache. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 01:30:12 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.23,1.24 Message-ID: <20090106013012.582FE70125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19986 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: revised from %{fcdir} to %{_fontconfig_templatedir} Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:21:29 -0000 1.23 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:29:42 -0000 1.24 @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai -%define fcdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d @@ -83,9 +82,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} # dirs -install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -install -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} -install -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} # ttfs install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir}/ @@ -98,16 +97,17 @@ mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} # fontconfig config files -install -d %{buildroot}%{fcdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} for fconf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{fcdir}/ + install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done for fconf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{fcdir}/ + install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType %{umingfontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO %dir %{ukaifontdir} %{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc -%{fcdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 01:35:16 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.24,1.25 Message-ID: <20090106013516.4C7D670125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21780 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: fixed %comm_desc line break Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:29:42 -0000 1.24 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:34:45 -0000 1.25 @@ -2,11 +2,9 @@ %define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} %define archivename %{name}-%{version} %define common_desc \ -Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made -available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended +Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made \available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended \ by the CJK Unifonts project. - %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 01:49:12 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.25,1.26 Message-ID: <20090106014912.CB3D27013C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26317 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: fixed .conf ln -s path mistake Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:34:45 -0000 1.25 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:48:42 -0000 1.26 @@ -100,13 +100,13 @@ for fconf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done for fconf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 02:08:40 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.26,1.27 Message-ID: <20090106020840.3E1A570125@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv809 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: retag Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.26 retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -r1.26 -r1.27 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 01:48:42 -0000 1.26 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 02:08:10 -0000 1.27 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 11.1%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.fc11 +* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.1.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) * Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11 From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 02:25:04 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.27,1.28 Message-ID: <20090106022504.AC9D170141@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7027 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: fixed .conf ln -s path mistake Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.27 retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -r1.27 -r1.28 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 02:08:10 -0000 1.27 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 02:24:34 -0000 1.28 @@ -10,12 +10,9 @@ %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -%define umingbuilddir ../%{name}-uming-%{version} -%define ukaibuilddir ../%{name}-ukai-%{version} - Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 11.1%{?dist} +Release: 11.2%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -97,18 +94,24 @@ # fontconfig config files install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -for fconf in `ls %{umingbuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` + +cd %{name}-uming-%{version} +for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done -for fconf in `ls %{ukaibuilddir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` +cd .. + +cd %{name}-ukai-%{version} +for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done +cd .. # backward compat install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType @@ -213,7 +216,7 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.1.fc11 +* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.2.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) * Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060244.n062i6Ro003009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:44:04 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Jan 6 07:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:15:30 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060715.n067FUAq015143@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug 70132 depends on bug 458160, which changed state. Bug 458160 Summary: [PATCH] Can't use .otf fonts via @font-face on Windows https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458160 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 07:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060726.n067Qj4n000827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 02:26:44 EDT --- (note that the macros used in the new templates are integral part of the new guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pravins at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 6 09:31:10 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090106093110.2B1ED70108@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14333 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 06 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-2 - bugfix 477458 - updated spec Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- smc-fonts.spec 29 Jul 2008 09:14:48 -0000 1.2 +++ smc-fonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 09:30:39 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,25 +1,38 @@ -%define fontname smc -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontname smc +%define fontconf 90-%{fontname} + +# Common description +%define common_desc \ +The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of\ +traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/smc Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-%{version}.zip BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %description -The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of -traditional and new Malayalam Script. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for smc-fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc %package dyuthi Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description dyuthi The smc-fonts-dyuthi package contains fonts for the display of @@ -28,6 +41,7 @@ %package meera Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ with exceptions %description meera The smc-fonts-meera package contains fonts for the display of @@ -37,6 +51,7 @@ %package rachana Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ %description rachana The smc-fonts-rachana package contains fonts for the display of @@ -46,6 +61,7 @@ %package raghumalayalam Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2 %description raghumalayalam The smc-fonts-malayalam package contains fonts for the display of @@ -54,6 +70,7 @@ %package suruma Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description suruma The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of @@ -62,6 +79,7 @@ %package kalyani Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description kalyani The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of @@ -70,11 +88,27 @@ %package anjalioldlipi Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions %description anjalioldlipi The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +#%{_fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only +%_font_pkg -n dyuthi Dyuthi*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n meera -f 90-%{fontname}-fonts.conf Meera*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n rachana Rachana*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n raghumalayalam RaghuMalayalamSans*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n suruma suruma*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n kalyani Kalyani*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n anjalioldlipi AnjaliOldLipi.ttf + %prep %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04 @@ -82,145 +116,31 @@ echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install - rm -rf %{buildroot} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} -install -m 0644 -p $RPM_BUILD_DIR/malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/90-%{fontname}.conf +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +install -m 0644 -p $RPM_BUILD_DIR/malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-fonts.conf +for fconf in %{fontconf}-fonts.conf ; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf +done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} -%post dyuthi -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post meera -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post rachana -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post raghumalayalam -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post suruma -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post kalyani -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post anjalioldlipi -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun dyuthi -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun meera -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun rachana -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun raghumalayalam -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun suruma -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun kalyani -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi - -%postun anjalioldlipi -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then -%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi -#%{fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only -%files dyuthi +%files common %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/Dyuthi*.ttf - -%files meera -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/90-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/Meera*.ttf - -%files rachana -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/Rachana*.ttf - -%files raghumalayalam -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/RaghuMalayalamSans*.ttf - -%files suruma -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/suruma*.ttf - -%files kalyani -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/Kalyani*.ttf - -%files anjalioldlipi -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc *.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/AnjaliOldLipi.ttf +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Tue Jan 06 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-2 +- bugfix 477458 +- updated spec + * Tue Jul 29 2008 Pravin Satpute 04.1-1 - new upstream release - fontconfig rule for size adjustment of Meera is added From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060939.n069dBPO026417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-06 04:39:10 EDT --- updated specs, It will be in tomorrows rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061014.n06AElG0001686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 05:14:46 EDT --- Thank you very much for looking at this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 14:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061426.n06EQGnQ023415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-06 09:26:15 EDT --- Here's what I found: ./lang/km_utf8/fonts/default.ttf Packaged in khmeros-fonts-base, can be symlinked and required. ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? I'll then notify upstream. ./lib/default.ttf - FreeSans - Copyleft, can be subpackaged, but it might be packaged already, what's a good way to check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061609.n06G9DOY016174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 11:09:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Here's what I found: > > ./lang/km_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > Packaged in khmeros-fonts-base, can be symlinked and required. But make sure that the khmeros-fonts packager converted to the new guidelines first > ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then > symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? > I'll then notify upstream. No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen? > ./lib/default.ttf - FreeSans - Copyleft, can be subpackaged, but it might be > packaged already, what's a good way to check? Is in the freefonts package, but it's better to require a dejavu variant when an app just wants a generic font without specific style needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061930.n06JUFMM012347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477370, which changed state. Bug 477370 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 19:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061930.n06JUEY7012322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-06 14:30:13 EDT --- Should be fixed on blender-2.49a-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:15:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062015.n06KFXLR001484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 15:15:33 EDT --- (of course you should also ask upstream to add fontconfig support to blender so it does not need a private font at all) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062014.n06KEffh020554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477370, which changed state. Bug 477370 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 20:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062014.n06KEfiw020524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 15:14:40 EDT --- Actually, opening the blender ttf in the gnome font previewer (or in fontforge if you prefer) shows it is a very old copy of Dejavu Sans (2.8, rawhide is at 2.28), so it's much better to add a dep on dejavu-fonts-sans and symlink the font in blender from here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Jan 6 22:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:22:12 -0800 Subject: [Bug 455647] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062222.n06MMCJu004592@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455647 Al Billings changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|fixed1.9.0.6 |verified1.9.0.6 CC| |abillings at mozilla.com --- Comment #32 from Al Billings 2009-01-06 14:22:06 PST --- Verified fixed in 1.9.0.6 with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6pre) Gecko/2009010604 GranParadiso/3.0.6pre. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062239.n06MdcQO030416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #3 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-06 17:39:37 EDT --- Bug 318071 deals with the same problem, but for Lohit Kannada. That bug was closed with the comment that a fix "is not possible in the current opentype framework." However the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm is able to render these combinations correctly. I hope Lohit Telugu and Lohit Kannada could be fixed to handle these combinations just like Pothana2000. BTW the gnome bug above says the problem isn't seen in Kannada, which isn't true. Just that the problem is less noticeable when compared to Telugu (since in Kannada the virama connects to the right of the first consonant anyway, unlike in Telugu where it connects to the top). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Tue Jan 6 23:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:18:50 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062318.n06NIoth021990@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Bug 449356 depends on bug 461087, which changed state. Bug 461087 Summary: provide templates for automatically-releasing handles to foreign resources https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461087 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 00:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070004.n0704DwE029885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |dustismo-fonts - font with |dustin-dustismo-fonts - |serif and sans-serif |font with serif and |versions |sans-serif versions Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-06 19:04:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 03:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070304.n0734B6r024061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |tagoh at redhat.com |ge.net | --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-06 22:04:10 EDT --- will work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 06:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070632.n076WXiZ006373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-07 01:32:32 EDT --- What would you suggest subpackaging for this? I guess current subpackaging may be not sufficient for new policy. as per policy, I'm going to have: - VLGothic-fonts-common for docs etc. - VLGothic-fonts-gothic for VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf with Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts < 20081203-2 - VLGothic-fonts-pgothic or VLGothic-fonts-proportional-gothic for VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf with Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20081203-2 Does it make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 07:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] New: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Summary: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #233257 +++ Description of problem: Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0C9D+U0CCA and U0C9D+U0CCB. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: 1. Every Time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gnome-character-map. 2. Select U0C9D followed by U0CCA followed by U0C9D followed by U0CCB. Actual results: As shown in the attached image Expected results: As shown by the following steps: 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. 2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp. 3. Enter the combination JoJO. Additional info: 1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358 also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada. 2. This is similar to earlier bugs: bug 231965 and bug 233257. Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 07:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070703.n0773Km8011740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #1 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 02:03:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328351) Incorrect rendering of U0C9D U0CCA U0C9D U0CCB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070916.n079Gxvq024949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 04:16:58 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ZendFramework'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0094 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070923.n079NTu9010636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-07 04:23:27 EDT --- Those other pages that were approved yesterday by FPC (minutes not posted yet) may also be relevant for VLGothic http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) You probably want to perform the naming changes at the same time. To change a srpm naming, the current procedure is to orphan the old package in rawhide, and post a review request with the new name (I'll approve it as a matter of course if you do so) This will be discussed this evening by FESCO, you may want to add some input here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages As for the upgrade path, you have two choices: 1. If there is a clear mapping between the old packages and the new packages, use obsoletes inside the packages 2. If there is not use a compat package to garbage collect the old packages as has been done for dejavu in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071200.n07C0qBr014841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071515.n07FFcrx028293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 15:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071515.n07FFbjP028240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From slankes at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 7 19:40:23 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090107194023.6F77070100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv772 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf --- serif Dustismo Dustismo serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-dustismo %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \ serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package roman Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description roman %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations %_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts * Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec * Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes - 20030207-1 - Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Dustismo.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip From slankes at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 7 19:56:40 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20090107195640.B593770100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-10 Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf --- serif Dustismo Dustismo serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-dustismo %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \ serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package roman Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description roman %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations %_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts * Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec * Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes - 20030207-1 - Initial packaging From slankes at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 7 19:56:40 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20090107195640.F190570100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2891/F-9 Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-roman-fontconfig.conf --- serif Dustismo Dustismo serif --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-dustismo %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc General purpose fonts by Dustin Norlander available in \ serif and sans-serif versions. The fonts cover all European Latin characters. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package roman Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description roman %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations %_font_pkg -n roman -f %{fontconf}-roman.conf Dustismo_Roman_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic_Bold.ttf Dustismo_Roman_Italic.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts * Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec * Wed Dec 31 2008 Sven Lankes - 20030207-1 - Initial packaging From slankes at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 7 20:02:07 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090107200207.7A98A70100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: add the source file for the release branches Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Dustismo.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip From slankes at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 7 20:02:07 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 20:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 .cvsignore,1.1,1.2 sources,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090107200207.CA72270100@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3724/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: add the source file for the release branches Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Dustismo.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 7 Jan 2009 00:04:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 7 Jan 2009 20:01:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +de74f82082b7dba21e457b8bb32b88a5 Dustismo.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901072010.n07KAjnu011714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 15:10:45 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 20:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901072009.n07K9tUo011305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 15:09:54 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 23:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901072309.n07N9QUa012325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-07 18:09:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > > ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > > Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then > > symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? > > I'll then notify upstream. > > No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen? In fact Tongan and Samoan are already 100% covered by Dejavu (all families), so this is not only illegal, but totally unecesary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080416.n084Go1K032111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 23:16:50 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0309 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080419.n084J22x032722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 23:19:01 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080435.n084ZVjk003185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[kn_IN] Conjuct combination |[kn_IN] Conjunct |of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB |combination of U0C9D with |is rendering wrongly |U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering | |wrongly --- Comment #2 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 23:35:31 EDT --- Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf and U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf which show the correct conjuncts. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed need to be added/corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080451.n084pEOZ020110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 23:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328437) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328437) Incorrect rendering of U0CAA U0CCA U0CAB U0CCA Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0CAA+U0CCA, U0CAB+U0CCA, U0CAA+U0CCB, and U0CAB+U0CCB as well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: 1. Every Time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gnome-character-map. 2. Select U0CAA followed by U0CCA followed by U0CAB followed by U0CCA. Actual results: As shown in the attached image Expected results: As shown by the following steps: 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. 2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp. 3. Enter the combination poPo. Additional info: 1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358 also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada. 2. This is similar to the earlier issue reported here. 3. Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?] and U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?] which show the conjuncts like kannadakasturi.com. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed seem to be incorrect. Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 8 07:01:14 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.28,1.29 Message-ID: <20090108070114.CD6AB700FD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21724 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: repatched rev 11 Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.28 retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29 --- cjkunifonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 02:24:34 -0000 1.28 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 8 Jan 2009 07:00:44 -0000 1.29 @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made \available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended \ by the CJK Unifonts project. +%define umingbuilddir ../%{name}-uming-%{version} +%define ukaibuilddir ../%{name}-ukai-%{version} %define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming %define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d @@ -12,7 +14,7 @@ Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 11.2%{?dist} +Release: 12%{?dist} Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -95,23 +97,23 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -cd %{name}-uming-%{version} +cd %{umingbuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf + cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ && \ + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf && \ + cd - done -cd .. - -cd %{name}-ukai-%{version} +cd %{ukaibuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - ln -s %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf + cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ && \ + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf && \ + cd - done -cd .. +cd - # backward compat install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType @@ -176,14 +178,15 @@ %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc -%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN +%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf @@ -203,20 +206,21 @@ %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO %dir %{ukaifontdir} -%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc -%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN +%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc +%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai %changelog -* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-11.2.fc11 +* Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) * Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080722.n087MnYm029436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:22:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080722.n087MmQg029404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 02:22:47 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080736.n087ae6X031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 09:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 04:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479238] New: please update to latest release (20090104) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please update to latest release (20090104) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Summary: please update to latest release (20090104) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freefont AssignedTo: orion at cora.nwra.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: orion at cora.nwra.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: A new release was made recently (the second since the last update by spot): could you please update the package to the latest upstream version? Actual results: freefont-20080323 Expected results: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/freefont/freefont-ttf-20090104.tar.gz Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081539.n08FdjKM006214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-08 10:39:44 EDT --- Ok, I'll check out the khmeros-fonts packaging, and use freefont. WRT ArialNarrow->Dejavu, how do I know which font file to use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081939.n08JdiaZ014930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-08 14:39:42 EDT --- Just drop all fonts in the tongan and samoan packages, and use dejavu sans as the default app font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901082222.n08MMpDx016775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901082222.n08MMoWA016758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477408 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-08 17:22:49 EDT --- Waiting on 477408 for khmeros-fonts. I'll work on the rest in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 23:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901082300.n08N0CXU023954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #28 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-01-08 18:00:09 EDT --- Ok, for me, the spec file is now ok. Just about the fontconf, change the "sans-serif" to "serif". I will test the building this week-end. I will surely approved this package on Sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 9 00:06:10 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090109000610.613A47013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19293 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: revolves: rhbz#477332 (convert to new font packaging guidelines) Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 30 Jun 2008 06:11:03 -0000 1.5 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 00:05:40 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@ -%define fontname baekmuk-ttf +%define fontname baekmuk-ttf +%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} +%define archivename %{name}-%{version} +%define common_desc \ +This package provides the free Korean TrueType fonts. %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d @@ -6,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,21 +19,26 @@ Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: FAPIcidfmap.ko Source2: cidfmap.ko + Obsoletes: fonts-korean + +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 %description -This package provides the free Korean TrueType fonts. +%common_desc %package common Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 %description common +%common_desc + This package contains some common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. %define mk_pkg()\ @@ -38,9 +47,11 @@ License: Baekmuk\ Group: User Interface/X\ Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6\ -Requires: %{name}-common\ +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common\ \ %description %1\ +%common_desc\ +\ This package contains the Korean TrueType font %2 typeface.\ \ %post %1\ @@ -75,35 +86,38 @@ %{nil} %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} # for catalogue -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} +install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} for i in batang dotum gulim hline; do - install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}-$i - install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}-$i - ln -sf ../../..%{fontdir}-$i $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name}-$i - %{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}-$i -o $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}-$i/fonts.scale - mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}-$i + install -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i + install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i + ln -sf ../../..%{fontdir}-$i %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-$i + %{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i/fonts.scale + mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i done # for ghostscript -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir} -install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ -install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{cidmapdir}/ +install -d %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir} +install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ # convert Korean copyright file to utf8 iconv -f EUC-KR -t UTF-8 COPYRIGHT.ks > COPYRIGHT.ko %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} %files common %doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README %{cidmapdir}/ %changelog +* Fri Jan 09 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-10.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Convert to new font packaging guidelines.) + * Mon Jun 30 2008 Caius Chance - 2.2-9.fc10 - Refine obsoletes tag version-release specific. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 00:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090015.n090F0HC019592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 00:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090014.n090ExYN019559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 19:14:58 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 9 03:15:26 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.25,1.26 Message-ID: <20090109031527.2A4CC7011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4039 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * Resolves: rhbz#477410 (convert into new font packaging guidelines) Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -r1.25 -r1.26 --- liberation-fonts.spec 9 Dec 2008 06:31:21 -0000 1.25 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 03:14:54 -0000 1.26 @@ -1,28 +1,65 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/liberation +%define fontname liberation +%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} +%define archivename %{name}-%{version} +%define common_desc \ +The Liberation Fonts are intended to be replacements for the three most \ +commonly used fonts on Microsoft systems: Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier \ +New. + +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts -Name: liberation-fonts -Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 2%{?dist} -# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains -# GPLv2 and two exceptions: +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts +Version: 1.04.93 +Release: 3%{?dist} +# The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two +# exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. -# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like -# the one in GPLv3. This license is Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 -# incompatible. -License: Liberation -Group: User Interface/X -URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ -Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root -BuildArch: noarch -Buildrequires: xorg-x11-font-utils +# The second exception is an anti-lockdown clause somewhat like the one in +# GPLv3. This license is Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 incompatible. +License: Liberation +Group: User Interface/X +URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ +Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) +BuildArch: noarch +Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel xorg-x11-font-utils %description -The Liberation Fonts are intended to be replacements for the three -most commonly used fonts on Microsoft systems: Times New Roman, -Arial, and Courier New. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. +License: Liberation +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +Shared common files of Liberation font families. + +%define mk_pkg()\ +%package %1\ +Summary: %3 fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft %4\ +License: Liberation\ +Group: User Interface/X\ +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common\ +\ +%description %1\ +%common_desc\ +\ +%3 TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft %4.\ +\ +%files %1\ +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)\ +%dir %{fontdir}\ +%{fontdir}/Liberation%2-*.ttf + +%mk_pkg sans Sans Sans Arial +%mk_pkg serif Serif Sans-serif Times_New_Roman +%mk_pkg mono Mono Monospace Courier_New %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}.devel @@ -31,6 +68,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %build +%{nil} %install rm -rf %{buildroot} @@ -40,8 +78,8 @@ # configuration install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d # catalogue -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} -ln -sf %{fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name} +install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} # generate fonts.dir and fonts.scale mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} @@ -59,16 +97,17 @@ fi fi -%files -%defattr(-,root,root) -%doc License.txt COPYING -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.ttf +%files common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING License.txt README %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} %changelog +* Fri Jan 09 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-3.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477410 (Convert to new font packaging guidelines.) + * Tue Dec 09 2008 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-2.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#474522 (Cent sign is not coressed in Sans & Mono.) From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 9 03:32:05 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.26,1.27 Message-ID: <20090109033205.3E1087011C@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5299 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * resolves: rhbz#477410 (added meta package and refined rependencies) Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.26 retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -r1.26 -r1.27 --- liberation-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 03:14:54 -0000 1.26 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 03:31:34 -0000 1.27 @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ Group: User Interface/X URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz + +Requires: liberation-fonts-sans >= %{version} +Requires: liberation-fonts-serif >= %{version} +Requires: liberation-fonts-mono >= %{version} BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel xorg-x11-font-utils @@ -29,6 +33,9 @@ %description %common_desc +Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace +families. + %package common Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. License: Liberation @@ -45,7 +52,7 @@ Summary: %3 fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft %4\ License: Liberation\ Group: User Interface/X\ -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common\ +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common >= %{version}\ \ %description %1\ %common_desc\ @@ -97,6 +104,9 @@ fi fi +%files +%{nil} + %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING License.txt README From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090404.n0944Q04012170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090404.n0944Qft012145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 23:04:25 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090535.n095Zf4S009399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #1 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 00:35:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328518) Liberation Mono Bold 1.04.93 with antialiasing off -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] New: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cody at zone38.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328517) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328517) Liberation Mono 1.04.93 with antialiasing on Description of problem: Though the hinting has been fixed in Sans Bold as of version 1.04.92, the letter "u" still has incorrect hinting in Mono Bold, an error that's quite noticeable in certain sizes on any system with bytecode hinting enabled. I'm attaching a screenshot from Ubuntu to demonstrate; of particular note are 9 point (the second line) and 12 point (the 5th line). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04.93 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090535.n095ZDlO021064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328517|Liberation Mono 1.04.93 |Liberation Mono Bold description|with antialiasing on |1.04.93 with antialiasing | |on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090602.n0962D6k030516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cody at zone38.net --- Comment #8 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 01:02:12 EDT --- The hinting has not been adjusted for the new design of the ? sign - see attachment 328522 which I just posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090601.n0961fJu019506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 01:01:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328522) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328522) Display of cent sign in Sans and Mono with bytecode hinting Hinting for ? is completely broken-- particularly in Mono. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090605.n0965HCR020869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434647] X server segfaults in libXfont fs_cleanup_bfont() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090603.n0963LN8031074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434647 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 01:03:20 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450980] Unable to install pango-devel for i386 and x86_64 at the same time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090635.n096ZdpX009299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450980 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 01:35:38 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090650.n096oscG014377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 01:50:53 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 360901] Smaller fonts in X in F8T3 after login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090721.n097Lpi1023648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360901 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #13 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 02:21:50 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 07:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 02:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436610] 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090742.n097gOhM022087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436610 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 02:42:23 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479386] New: Pango multilib conflict on F10 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pango multilib conflict on F10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479386 Summary: Pango multilib conflict on F10 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: stransky at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package pango-devel.i386 0:1.22.3-1.fc10 set to be updated ---> Package pango.i386 0:1.22.3-1.fc10 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================== Updating: pango i386 1.22.3-1.fc10 updates 375 k pango-devel i386 1.22.3-1.fc10 updates 327 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================== Install 0 Package(s) Update 2 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total size: 701 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: ===================================================== Entering rpm code ====================================================== Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html from install of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html from install of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install pango.i386 on x86_64 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091325.n09DPBZB005601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477488, which changed state. Bug 477488 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091325.n09DPAQH005571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 08:25:09 EDT --- [Some optional QA comments] Unless you have a very specific font style need, please consider linking from one of the DejaVu packages as most fedora systems will already have them installed so xplanet won't require the download of a new font package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:42:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091342.n09DgoNY009810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477478, which changed state. Bug 477478 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477478] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091342.n09DgnPq009785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 08:42:48 EDT --- Two QA remarks: 1. Even though the same default font set is likely to be installed in all Fedora system it's not 100% guaranteed. Fontconfig apps can manage very well as long as there is one font on the system so we don't peg specific ones via deps in that case. OTOH, you absolutely need the exact target of your symlinks to be present or I suppose bad things will happen. So I advice to actually require the packages providing the font files you've symlinked in your app. 2. While the LGC variants of dejavu are smaller, we install the full versions by default. So if you depend on the full versions, your app won't consume resources not already available on most systems. And if you depend on the LGC versions, you'll force the download of additional material. Therefore linking the full version instead of the LGC one will be a space win in the majority of cases -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091404.n09E4JkK016096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-09 09:04:18 EDT --- Is someone working on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091410.n09EAM1c008807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091410.n09EALFx008770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:10:19 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. That will require you to perform the mkfontdir stuff manually and probably put the fonts.scale files in a separate subpackage. Given all the problems we have with core X fonts doing this or even dropping fonts.scale altogether for this package is not necessarily a bad thing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091416.n09EGQFd010070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-09 09:16:25 EDT --- I plan to, for F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091420.n09EKo4P011100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091420.n09EKmJF011066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:20:47 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091433.n09EXaPm013778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:33:35 EDT --- Seems Debian did the same a few years ago, so there may be some useful info here http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-devel at lists.debian.org/msg210482.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091448.n09Em08J017263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477385, which changed state. Bug 477385 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091447.n09ElwCo017206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:47:57 EDT --- BTW unless your app has very specific style or metric needs it's much better to replace FreeSans Bold with symlinks to DejaVu since this one is more likely to be already installed on system (and thus you'll avoid a new font download) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091456.n09EuQj5019299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 09:56:25 EDT --- Well, using that particular font is upstream's choice. Why should I override it? Are those two fonts identical? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091501.n09F16si029427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477391, which changed state. Bug 477391 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477391] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091501.n09F147t029373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:01:03 EDT --- Please consider symlinking to dejavu instead as it's essentially an update and extension of the dejavu fonts and besides is likely to be already available on system so a dejavu dep will usually not result in a new download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091510.n09FAsXK032014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:10:53 EDT --- They are not ? they have slightly different style, metrics and very different coverage. But since they are both in the "general-purpose font" category most projects that use FreeSans do not care if it's replaced by dejavu or not. (and dejavu is better quality, has more coverage, and is part of our default installs, etc). However this is definitely something worth discussing with upstream before doing the change. (would also be a good time to suggest them to use fontconfig so you don't have to be in the font management business at all; if they use one of the higher level text libs such as pango or pangocairo they'll also win support for more scripts than just latin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477399] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091531.n09FVqQ7027911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477399 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:31:51 EDT --- Note that artbrush is likely to be a free font, but tracking the original author and making sure of it requires someone with lots of persistence and time The web finds the following attribution Gary D. Jessey RR 1, Box 107 Jenkins, Kentucky 41537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091547.n09FlCr3008221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477414, which changed state. Bug 477414 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091542.n09Fgucw006993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477414] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091547.n09FlBbU008196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:47:09 EDT --- Please consider symlinking to the dejavu full packages are they are effectively a modern vera extension and update and will already be installed on most systems (so your package won't pull in a new font package in that case) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091542.n09FgtY0006968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:42:54 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. Behdad requested an end to all the variations around fontconfig caching, so he does not have to check every font package for fontconfig breakage. The %_font_pkg macro puts all this stuff in a single package he can easily audit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091602.n09G2LQD012026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state. Bug 477416 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091602.n09G2KxY012002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 11:02:18 EDT --- There are quite a lot of fonts in there and it's not sufficient to split them in a fonts subpackage, this subpackage also needs to conform to Fedora guidelines The decision tree is the following: for each font family in lilipond: 1. check with upstream if this font was created or modified by lilypond a. if it's just a copy of someone else's font, check if this font is available in Fedora i. if yes, add a dep on the existing fedora package (for example the urw fonts) ii. if no, get the original font source packaged separately b. if the font was created or modified by lilypond, create a separate subpackage for it (that installs it in correct font directories, using the official fedora rpm font macros) 2. symlink in the main lilypond package the font files installed in /usr/share/fonts provided by those packages of subpackages 3. add all the new font packages or subpackages to the fonts comps group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091613.n09GDSXP014724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477422, which changed state. Bug 477422 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091615.n09GFa1e015348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477428, which changed state. Bug 477428 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477428] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091615.n09GFZCs015323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 11:15:34 EDT --- (reopening so the dejavu vs vera bit is not lost) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091613.n09GDR34014695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 11:13:26 EDT --- Please consider symlinking to the dejavu full packages are they are effectively a modern vera extension and update and will already be installed on most systems (so your package won't pull in a new font package in that case) Also do check the package names you use in deps are available in fedora-devel ; there has been quite a lot of restructuring fonts-wise here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091623.n09GNNGG017362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477432, which changed state. Bug 477432 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091623.n09GNMX6017337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 11:23:21 EDT --- Please consider symlinking to the correct dejavu full package as dejavu is effectively a modern vera extension and update and will already be installed on most systems (so your package won't pull in a new font package in that case) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091628.n09GSBEf018670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477434, which changed state. Bug 477434 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091628.n09GSAuu018633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 11:28:09 EDT --- Please consider linking to dejavu full and not lgc as full is installed on most Fedora systems while LGC is not -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Fri Jan 9 16:54:31 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 9 Jan 2009 16:54:31 -0000 Subject: [Issue 97885] Font and Font size show disharmony in Calc After chinese translation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090109165431.10931.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97885 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'pj' |'fedorafonts,pj' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477391] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091703.n09H30bj026020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-09 12:02:59 EDT --- Do you mean dejavu is an update of bitstream vera? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477478] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091719.n09HJUA1019579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-09 12:19:29 EDT --- 1) vdr-skins already has dependencies to the symlink target providing dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans and dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono packages. Did I miss something? Ideally I'd actually like to depend on the exact symlinked filenames (they have moved at least 3 times during the last 18 or so months which is not fun at all) but that would cause download of yum filelists which is very much frowned upon. So I'll keep the package name dependencies (and have a build time %check test which unfortunately does not help after build), hoping that the font filenames are no longer moved around. 2) Thanks for the info - in Aug 2007, dejavu-lgc had become more ubiquitous than vera and full dejavu which is why I changed to it. Will take a look at switching to full dejavu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477391] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091720.n09HKjlx030064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 12:20:44 EDT --- dejavu is a fork of vera with a huge number of glyphs added and many fixes to the original vera parts. Vera has essentially fossilized when the contract Bitstream head with the GNOME foundation expired -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091718.n09HIXEU029490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-09 12:18:32 EDT --- Looking at the pre-build tarball, it appears that the build process constructs the fonts at that time. This would lead to 1b above. Do I need to move the fonts from /usr/share/lilypond-%{version}/fonts to /usr/share/fonts/lilypond and symlink? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477391] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091724.n09HOSQM020743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-09 12:24:27 EDT --- So it's not technically dead, just gradually being deprecated. I'll move to dejavu. Thanks for the information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477478] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091734.n09HYkG7032504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 12:34:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1) vdr-skins already has dependencies to the symlink target providing > dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans and dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono packages. Did I miss > something? I'm the one who messed up, too many font spec reviews today, I'm starting to see double :( > hoping that the font filenames > are no longer moved around. I though they moved twice, once because of a guideline change on our part and once because upstream changed. But that was for dejavu full, lgc may have had a more bumpy history as it's less critical. We do try to avoid renammings, but sometimes they happen. Fontconfig apps don't care :) > 2) Thanks for the info - in Aug 2007, dejavu-lgc had become more ubiquitous > than vera and full dejavu which is why I changed to it. Will take a look at > switching to full dejavu. We first used dejavu LGC as default in F6 then switched to DejaVu full for F9 when Behdad felt comfortable enough about it. Nowadays DejaVu LGC like Bitstream Vera is pretty much an historical package I don't like to see deps on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091739.n09HdpJW023556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 12:39:50 EDT --- You need to package each set of OTF font files that corresponds to a font family using the %_font_pkg macro. That will pretty much force guidelines compliance on you. I'm pretty sure at least the Century Schoolbook bit is an URW font which is already packaged many times in Fedora, and I'd be surprised the lilipond people had changed it. You probably need to discuss it a bit with lilypond people upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091744.n09HilFU024660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-09 12:44:46 EDT --- The INSTALL indicates that they have changed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091826.n09IQpi1001193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 13:26:51 EDT --- Then they should rename it at least :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477478] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091829.n09IT8gR001422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 13:29:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > 1) vdr-skins already has dependencies to the symlink target providing > > dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans and dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono packages. Did I miss > > something? > > I'm the one who messed up, too many font spec reviews today, I'm starting to > see double :( To clarify: as loog as you do not use fontconfig to discover font you do need to depend on the font files your app use (either via filename deps or via package deps, I don't care which one but others do) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 19:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477391] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091922.n09JMIgr014214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-09 14:22:17 EDT --- Switched to dejavu in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 19:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091922.n09JMJKf014239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477391, which changed state. Bug 477391 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477391 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 21:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092153.n09LrBrh017837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 --- Comment #4 from Wart 2009-01-09 16:53:10 EDT --- Can you recommend the correct package and font file? When it comes to fonts, I don't know my sans from my serif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 22:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092234.n09MYm9s025722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 17:34:47 EDT --- since you link vera sans bold right now the logical target would be dejavu sans bold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477414] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901100326.n0A3QMtM010450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Jameson 2009-01-09 22:26:19 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestion. The version in rawhide is now linking to fonts from dejavu-fonts-sans and dejavu-fonts-sans-mono. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901100326.n0A3QNDc010487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477414, which changed state. Bug 477414 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 11:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62, for fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101106.n0AB6E7S030629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Xose Vazquez Perez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:08:27 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #4 from Xose Vazquez Perez 2009-01-10 06:06:13 EDT --- any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101303.n0AD3spQ021220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477434, which changed state. Bug 477434 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101303.n0AD3roA021182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-10 08:03:52 EDT --- Ogre also uses condensed fonts in several places which are only available in the LGC version, closing again. Note orge itself is not used much, and the demos (which require the fonts) are even less often installed. So this really is not much of an issue IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101354.n0ADslni032623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #45 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-10 08:54:43 EDT --- rdieter, kevin_kofler upstream, wontfix or cantfix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101503.n0AF3b2x015811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #46 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-10 10:03:35 EDT --- shrug, upstream to trolltech would be the only sane way forward, imo. That would require someone who's experiencing this, and reproduce with a minimal test case. Any takers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101614.n0AGEwnK031512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477434, which changed state. Bug 477434 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101614.n0AGEvUT031465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-10 11:14:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ogre also uses condensed fonts in several places which are only available in > the LGC version, closing again. What a strange notion, of course condensed is available in dejavu-full just like in dejavu-lgc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101628.n0AGSQfs001727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-10 11:28:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Ogre also uses condensed fonts in several places which are only available in > > the LGC version, closing again. > > What a strange notion, of course condensed is available in dejavu-full just > like in dejavu-lgc [hans at localhost inf]$ ls /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/ DejaVuLGCSans-Bold.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-ExtraLight.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-Oblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf DejaVuLGCSans.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed-Bold.ttf DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed.ttf DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuLGCSansMono-Bold.ttf DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf DejaVuLGCSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSansMono-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf DejaVuLGCSansMono.ttf DejaVuSansMono.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-Bold.ttf DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-BoldItalic.ttf DejaVuSerif.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-Italic.ttf Note: This is F-10 so this may be fixed in rawhide, but I see no condensed versions of regular dejavu here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479521] New: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: pander at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ttf-liberation 1.04~beta2-2 from Ubuntu 8.10 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. retrieve font nama table ttx -d . -t name /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf 2. in python, read the XML file via doc = libxml2.parseFile('LiberationSans-Regular.ttx') Actual results: LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:27: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an ^ LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:69: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an Expected results: Red Ht should be Red Hat, this is all right for the other TTF files in this package. Additional info: Please fix and push updated package downstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101653.n0AGrgr2006485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-10 11:53:42 EDT --- This is because you do not have the experimental dejavu subpackage installed. Since it has not been experimental for quite a long time, and people like you were confused by the package split, F11 has a new package layout $ rpm -ql dejavu-fonts-sans /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/57-dejavu-sans.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/57-dejavu-sans.conf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf LGC is built from the same sources as dejavu by removing stuff so it can't have material not present in full -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901102058.n0AKwOnJ021273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477478, which changed state. Bug 477478 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 20:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477478] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901102058.n0AKwNfY021248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477478 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version|20081124-2 |20081124-3 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-10 15:58:22 EDT --- Changed to full dejavu in 20081124-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 21:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901102151.n0ALpXB1031988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477434, which changed state. Bug 477434 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 21:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901102151.n0ALpW2n031952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-10 16:51:31 EDT --- Ok, I changed it to use the full dejavu version now, closing again :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 22:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477434] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901102207.n0AM7XPd002379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477434 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-10 17:07:32 EDT --- Thanks a lot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Jan 11 11:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:00:34 -0800 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111100.n0BB0Y0j019025@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Natch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |433664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Jan 11 11:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:01:09 -0800 Subject: [Bug 378927] [meta] tracking bug for issues with pixel scaling at high dpis (resolutions) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111101.n0BB19wB023645@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927 Natch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|433664 | Depends on| |433664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJSYY014382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:27 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477413] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJlCJ014797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:46 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477368] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJCEd014082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:11 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477464] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKP5r016003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:24 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477404] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJbEp014557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:37 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477471] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKV05016115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:30 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477394] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJUpN014415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:29 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477472] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKWrv016138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:31 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477390] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJR4H014362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:26 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477480] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKdjs016293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:39 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477487] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKiVE016372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:43 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477382] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJLni014258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:20 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477477] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKbiU016253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:36 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477372] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJFPq014139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:14 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJAxl014044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:09 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477441] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK8kc015554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:07 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477439] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK7Gw015535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:06 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477450] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKH1H015822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:17 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477483] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKgxe016337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:41 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ9Hv014022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:08 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477424] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJurV015016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:55 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJWsT014453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:31 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJBXv014061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:10 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477444] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKBUF015616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:10 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKFoa015786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:14 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJEZ6014118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:13 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477442] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK993015576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:08 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477463] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKO6g015980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:24 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477386] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJOUf014316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:23 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJwG7015063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:57 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKfwo016315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:39 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJJPp014222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:18 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477403] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJaCo014531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:36 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477417] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJnlG014828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477417 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:48 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKYRl016183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:33 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJrlD014943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:52 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJqWw014914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:51 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKJRS015867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:19 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJgCv014696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:42 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJYVY014488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:34 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJpQa014884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:50 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKXb5016161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:32 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477378] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJKdY014246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:19 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477436] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK4ap015460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:03 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKZ81016213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:34 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJcjU014579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:37 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK3h7015438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:02 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJI89014199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:17 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJZ5p014514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:35 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477393] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJTSH014399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:28 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477331] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ5M0013948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:03 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477486] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKh9e016358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:42 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477333] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ70k013991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:06 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK5Nh015481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:04 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477443] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKASU015594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:10 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKk3g016412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:45 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKaec016235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:35 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKUuf016092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:29 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJe1a014625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:39 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477389] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJQcq014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:25 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477428] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJxXj015080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:58 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKE5u015675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:13 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477446] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKDBv015657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:12 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477459] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKM1f015912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:21 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJMQ8014280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:21 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477438] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK6xP015509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:05 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477457] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKLSX015887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:20 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477445] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKCDK015634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:11 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477398] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJXcQ014474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:33 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477412] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJk2T014780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:46 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKNxi015962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:23 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJVDC014432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:30 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKcxq016276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:37 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKQbt016025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:25 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKMi8015944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:22 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] kdelibs: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJfAx014666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:40 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477429] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK0w3015098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:59 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477449] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKH0K015805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:16 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJmEt014814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:47 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK2m6015211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:01 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKSNA016052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:27 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJDZX014099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:12 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ8tV014009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:07 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJscV014970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:54 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJGYi014161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:15 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKIKp015841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:18 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKTfM016070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:28 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477418] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJo3L014858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:49 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJiFw014737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:43 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJP1W014329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:24 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477411] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJjKB014759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:45 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477431] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK1Pf015115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:00 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJNTf014297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:22 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ5n2013961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:05 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKjge016389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:44 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477426] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJvVT015033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:56 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJtN6014998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:55 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJhDC014717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:42 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111606.n0BG6NDQ026266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-11 11:06:22 EDT --- So... currently this package looks as follows: Upstream archive name: terminus-font Fedora source package: terminus-font Fedora package with X11 fonts: terminus-font-x11 Fedora package with console fonts: terminus-fonts-console In order to conform to the new guidelines, I'd need to a) rename the package with the X11 fonts (and probably the source package) to "terminus-fonts" (with an "s" at the end) b) Either move the console font to a separate source/binary package, or have the new "terminus-fonts" package create a subpackage like "terminus-fonts-console". Is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111618.n0BGIbAS024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #6 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-11 11:18:36 EDT --- Uhm. Forget comment #5. I had assumed this bug was for a different package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111627.n0BGRYZi026651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 11:27:33 EDT --- Yes, sorry, next time I'll make sure the script use different summaries for different packages. Nevertheless to answer your comment what you wrote is correct (with the exception FPC is making noises about changing existing font package naming rules but I'm trying to dissuade them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111839.n0BIdiJi020832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477428, which changed state. Bug 477428 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 18:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477428] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111839.n0BIdh3q020806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-11 13:39:42 EDT --- ok. Switched to dejavu. Closing again... feel free to re-open if you spot anything further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 19:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] kdelibs: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111938.n0BJcKLW028267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency | |.de Component|kdelibs |koffice AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency | |.de --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-11 14:38:19 EDT --- fwiw, kdelibs dropped libkformula, which may make a re-appearance in koffice(2) soonish... moving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112126.n0BLQIX2018220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477370, which changed state. Bug 477370 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477370] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112126.n0BLQHt1018195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-11 16:26:16 EDT --- Thank you for your help. I have now created a symlink to dajavu-sams in felder-2.48a-10, so I will close this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112148.n0BLmOUR018637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 21:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112148.n0BLmrwY021693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112219.n0BMJaFp026780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 17:19:36 EDT --- @spot: please check the licensing history is clean (seems so, but I'm no expert) @oget: ? please add a page ("packaging request") describing your font describing your font as documented in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle ? please make sure your description/summary does not contain trademarked terms belonging to hostile entities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 00:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120058.n0C0wmcf019077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #8 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-11 19:58:47 EDT --- Well... this is what I have found out. The ntedfont.pfa file appears (according to kfontview) to contain a number of special symbols for typesetting music, and a set of numbers. I know of no tool to find out whether these symbols conform to any special unicode, or other encoding, or whether this is just a symbol font which maps the codes of some normal characters to the shapes of some special symbols. In any case, it appears to be designed just for use within the nted application. Now, I can install the ntedfont.pfa file into the new place required by the new font policy, and symlink it to the old location so that nted can find it. The ntedfont.pfa file will be shipped in its own separate subpackage nted-fonts, which nted will now require. That is no problem. However, I'm not quite getting what to use as fontconfig file here: a) "ruleset numeral prefix" only talks about fonts of characters, not of special symbols. b) those special symbols fit into neither of the "sans-serif, serif, monospace, fantasy or cursive" standard families Where can I find more information about the suitable prefix and the family? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120125.n0C1PqXs024253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 20:25:51 EDT --- updated in source repo rebuild tarball / zip https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120154.n0C1sInB028837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #10 from Adam Goode 2009-01-11 20:54:17 EDT --- I don't think it makes sense necessarily for this project to move to pango/cairo or such, as it does no rendering itself, just outputting PDF, PS, or HTML. As such it just uses the .pfa files internally to output PDF and PS. Also, the fonts all appear to be renamed urw-fonts in PFA format, or Deja Vu fonts in PFA format. I think the thing to do is: * Symlink the URW fonts to the system-installed fonts * Modify the code to call pfatopfb at the right time when embedding * Not ship the Deja Vu fonts, just map serif, monospace, sans to the URW versions * File bugs upstream Upstream makes few releases and generally moves slowly, so I'm not sure how fast it will go upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 02:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120236.n0C2a1ro006319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #11 from Adam Goode 2009-01-11 21:35:59 EDT --- http://www.htmldoc.org/str.php?L196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120415.n0C4F80G023542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #7 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 23:15:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328691) .spec w/ %_font_pkg but not buildable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120413.n0C4DJWK023107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 23:13:18 EDT --- I added: %_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc in .spec file. Then it isn't buildable since then with errors: rpmbuild --define "_sourcedir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_spmake: *** [noarch] Error 1 ora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_builddir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_srcrpmdir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_rpmdir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "dist .fc11" --define "fedora 11" --define "fc11 1" --target noarch -ba cjkunifonts.spec 2>&1 | tee .build--.log ; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]} error: line 142: Second %post Building target platforms: noarch Building for target noarch What would I need to do to get it work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120429.n0C4TM4u025706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477452, which changed state. Bug 477452 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120429.n0C4TLE1025686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-01-11 23:29:20 EDT --- already fixed in rawhide.http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=76447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120653.n0C6r934018819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 01:53:08 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#Where_is_the_rest_of_the_subpackaging_bits_in_spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#What_happened_to_the_fc-cache_scriptlets_listed_in_previous_guidelines.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#The_templates_must_be_wrong.2C_rpm_crashes.21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120659.n0C6xnht016998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 01:59:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > * Not ship the Deja Vu fonts, just map serif, monospace, sans to the > > URW versions > > Sounds good. However DejaVu has more coverage than URW fonts, so mid-term it > would be good to use it again. Worst case you'll have to take care of your own Type1 DejaVu package in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120657.n0C6vw6q016869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 01:57:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I don't think it makes sense necessarily for this project to move to > pango/cairo or such, as it does no rendering itself, just outputting PDF, PS, > or HTML. As such it just uses the .pfa files internally to output PDF and PS. This is one form of rendering too. But anyway the main point for you is to move to fontconfig in any form so you don't have to manage fonts in your package. > Also, the fonts all appear to be renamed urw-fonts in PFA format, or Deja Vu > fonts in PFA format. That's the usual duplication of system fonts in non-fontconfig apps. > I think the thing to do is: > > * Symlink the URW fonts to the system-installed fonts > > * Modify the code to call pfatopfb at the right time when embedding > > * Not ship the Deja Vu fonts, just map serif, monospace, sans to the > URW versions Sounds good. However DejaVu has more coverage than URW fonts, so mid-term it would be good to use it again. > * File bugs upstream > Upstream makes few releases and generally moves slowly, so I'm not sure how > fast it will go upstream. You'll only know by asking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 07:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120712.n0C7Ccnb022138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 02:12:37 EDT --- For symbol fonts you can skip the fontconfig bit, they mostly are one-of-a-kinds that don't really fit in existing classifications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120915.n0C9FmSo009512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 04:15:47 EDT --- You still have a (harmless but) useless fontdir define in your spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 10:41:01 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-9 tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,1.13,1.14 Message-ID: <20090112104101.A178970123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6333 Modified Files: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec Log Message: Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-9/tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 4 Jan 2008 12:30:47 -0000 1.13 +++ tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 12 Jan 2009 10:40:31 -0000 1.14 @@ -6,10 +6,11 @@ Name: tetex-font-cm-lgc Version: 0.5 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: CM-LGC Type1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing -License: GPL +# Font exception +License: GPLv2+ with exceptions URL: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-lgc Source0: cm-lgc-%{ctan_date}.zip # upstream source - unversioned zip file @@ -38,10 +39,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{fontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{enc,map}/dvips/%{texpkg} install -p -m 644 tex/latex/%{texpkg}/* %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ +install -p -m 644 fonts/afm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/ofm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/ovf/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/type1/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ @@ -75,6 +77,7 @@ %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING HISTORY README %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} @@ -85,6 +88,12 @@ %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.5-11 +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) + +* Mon Sep 8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 0.5-10 +- fix license tag + * Fri Jan 4 2008 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.5-9 - Drop -fonts requires. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 10:42:02 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-10 tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,1.14,1.15 Message-ID: <20090112104202.CFDC970123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6473 Modified Files: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec Log Message: Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-10/tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 8 Sep 2008 14:10:23 -0000 1.14 +++ tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 12 Jan 2009 10:41:32 -0000 1.15 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: tetex-font-cm-lgc Version: 0.5 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: CM-LGC Type1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing # Font exception @@ -39,10 +39,11 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{fontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{enc,map}/dvips/%{texpkg} install -p -m 644 tex/latex/%{texpkg}/* %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ +install -p -m 644 fonts/afm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/ofm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/ovf/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 fonts/type1/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING HISTORY README %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} @@ -86,6 +88,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.5-11 +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) + * Mon Sep 8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 0.5-10 - fix license tag From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 10:45:51 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,1.14,1.15 Message-ID: <20090112104551.AA9EC70123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6942 Modified Files: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec Log Message: - Restructure spec file according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes (bug #477461) - Split package to cm-lgc-fonts (.pfb and .afm) and tetex-font-cm-lgc (TeX stuff) - Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel/tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 8 Sep 2008 14:10:23 -0000 1.14 +++ tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec 12 Jan 2009 10:45:21 -0000 1.15 @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ %define ctan_date 20051007 -%define texmf %{_datadir}/texmf -%define texfonts %{texmf}/fonts -%define texpkg cm-lgc -%define fontpath public/%{texpkg} +%define texmf %{_datadir}/texmf +%define texfonts %{texmf}/fonts +%define texpkg cm-lgc +%define texfontpath public/%{texpkg} +# definitions for fontpackages +%define fontname cm-lgc +%define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts Name: tetex-font-cm-lgc Version: 0.5 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: CM-LGC Type1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing # Font exception @@ -16,17 +19,25 @@ # upstream source - unversioned zip file # ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-lgc.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -Requires: tetex-latex grep +Requires: texlive-latex grep cm-lgc-fonts +BuildRequires: symlinks BuildArch: noarch %description -This package contains the CM-LGC fonts. These are PostScript Type 1 -fonts converted from the METAFONT sources of the Computer Modern font -families. CM-LGC supports the T1, T2A, LGR, and TS1 encodings, -i.e. Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek. There are also support files for -Omega/Lambda. +TeX support files for the CM-LGC font. +%define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts +%package %{fontpkg} +Summary: CM-LGC Type1 fonts +Group: User Interface/X + +%description %{fontpkg} +The PostScript Type 1 fonts converted from the METAFONT sources of +the Computer Modern font families. CM-LGC supports the T1, T2A, LGR, +and TS1 encodings, i.e. Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek. + +%_font_pkg -n %{fontpkg} *.pfb *.afm %prep %setup -q -n %{texpkg} @@ -39,53 +50,76 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,ofm,ovf,type1,tfm,vf}/%{texfontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{enc,map}/dvips/%{texpkg} -install -p -m 644 tex/latex/%{texpkg}/* %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ -install -p -m 644 fonts/ofm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 fonts/ovf/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 fonts/type1/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 fonts/tfm/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 fonts/vf/%{fontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 dvips/base/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/enc/dvips/%{texpkg}/ -install -p -m 644 dvips/config/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg}/ - +install -m 644 -p tex/latex/%{texpkg}/* %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ +install -m 644 -p fonts/ofm/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ofm/%{texfontpath}/ +install -m 644 -p fonts/ovf/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/ovf/%{texfontpath}/ +install -m 644 -p fonts/tfm/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{texfontpath}/ +install -m 644 -p fonts/vf/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{texfontpath}/ +install -m 644 -p dvips/base/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/enc/dvips/%{texpkg}/ +install -m 644 -p dvips/config/* %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg}/ + +#install .pfb and .afm files in %{_fontdir} as per the fedora font guidelines +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p fonts/type1/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p fonts/afm/%{texfontpath}/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +pushd %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +for pfb_file in *.pfb ; do + ln -s %{_fontdir}/$pfb_file %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{texfontpath}/$pfb_file +done +for afm_file in *.afm ; do + ln -s %{_fontdir}/$afm_file %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{texfontpath}/$afm_file +done +popd %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post -/usr/bin/texhash -conffile="$(/usr/bin/texconfig-sys conf | /bin/grep updmap.cfg)" -if [ "$1" = "1" ]; then - /usr/bin/updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --enable Map %{texpkg}.map +%post +texhash +conffile="$(texconfig-sys conf | grep updmap.cfg)" +if [ "$1" -eq "1" ]; then + updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --enable Map %{texpkg}.map fi + %postun -conffile="$(/usr/bin/texconfig-sys conf | /bin/grep updmap.cfg)" -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - /usr/bin/updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --disable %{texpkg}.map +conffile="$(texconfig-sys conf | grep updmap.cfg)" +if [ "$1" -eq "0" ]; then + updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --disable %{texpkg}.map fi -/usr/bin/texhash +texhash %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING HISTORY README %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -%{texfonts}/ofm/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/ovf/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/ofm/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/ovf/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/tfm/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/type1/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/vf/%{texfontpath} %{texfonts}/enc/dvips/%{texpkg} %{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg} + %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.5-11 +- Restructure spec file according to + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes + (bug #477461) +- Split package to cm-lgc-fonts (.pfb and .afm) and tetex-font-cm-lgc + (TeX stuff) +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) + * Mon Sep 8 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 0.5-10 - fix license tag From pravins at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 10:45:59 2009 From: pravins at fedoraproject.org (Pravin Satpute) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/samyak-fonts/devel samyak-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090112104559.DB93470123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7015 Modified Files: samyak-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jan 12 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-2 - bugzilla 477451 - updated spec Index: samyak-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel/samyak-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- samyak-fonts.spec 18 Sep 2008 09:35:10 -0000 1.5 +++ samyak-fonts.spec 12 Jan 2009 10:45:29 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,56 +1,90 @@ -%define xfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts -%define langlist "devanagari gujarati tamil malayalam oriya" +%define fontname samyak +%define langlist "devanagari gujarati tamil malayalam oriya" -Name: samyak-fonts -Version: 1.2.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} -Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts -Group: User Interface/X -License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -URL: https://sarovar.org/projects/samyak/ -Source: samyak-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +# Common description +%define common_desc \ +The Samyak package contains fonts for the display of \ +Scripts Devanagari, Gujarati, Malayalam, Oriya and Tamil + +Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Version: 1.2.1 +Release: 2%{?dist} +Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +URL: https://sarovar.org/projects/samyak/ +Source: samyak-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %description -The Samyak package contains fonts for the display of -Scripts Devanagari, Gujarati, Malayalam, Oriya and Tamil +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for smc-fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +%package devanagari +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Devanagari script +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description devanagari +This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ +Scripts Devanagari. + +%package tamil +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Tamil script +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description tamil +This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ +Scripts Tamil. + + +%package malayalam +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description malayalam +This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ +Scripts Malayalam. + +%package gujarati +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Gujarai script +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description gujarati +This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ +Scripts Gujarati. + +%package oriya +Summary: Open Type Fonts for Oriya script +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +License: GPLv3+ with exceptions +%description oriya +This package contains truetype/opentype font for the display of \ +Scripts Oriya. + +%_font_pkg -n devanagari %{fontname}-devanagari/Samyak-*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n tamil %{fontname}-tamil/*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n malayalam %{fontname}-malayalam/*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n oriya %{fontname}-oriya/*.ttf + +%_font_pkg -n gujarati %{fontname}-gujarati/*.ttf -# mk_pkg -%define mk_pkg() \ -%package -n samyak-fonts-%1\ -Summary: Free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") font\ -Group: User Interface/X \ -Provides: ttfonts-%2 = 1.8-2\ -Obsoletes : ttfonts-%2 <= 1.8-1\ -\ -\ -%description -n samyak-fonts-%1\ -This package provides a free %(echo %1 | sed -e "s/\\(.*\\)/\\u\\1/") truetype/opentype font.\ -\ -%files -n samyak-fonts-%1\ -%defattr(-, root, root, -)\ -%doc COPYING README AUTHORS\ -%dir %{xfontdir}/samyak-%1\ -%{xfontdir}/samyak-%1/*.ttf\ -\ -%post -n samyak-fonts-%1 \ -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir}/samyak-%1 \ -fi \ -\ -%postun -n samyak-fonts-%1 \ -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then \ - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then \ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{xfontdir}/samyak-%1 \ - fi \ -fi - -%mk_pkg gujarati gu -%mk_pkg devanagari hi -%mk_pkg malayalam ml -%mk_pkg oriya or -%mk_pkg tamil ta %prep %setup -q -n samyak-fonts-%{version} @@ -59,18 +93,28 @@ echo "Nothing to do in Build." %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} for i in "%{langlist}" do - install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/samyak-$i - install -m 0644 $i/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{xfontdir}/samyak-$i +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/samyak-$i +install -m 0644 -p $i/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/samyak-$i done %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} + + +%files common +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc COPYING README AUTHORS +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-2 +- bugzilla 477451 +- updated spec + * Thu Sep 18 2008 Pravin Satpute 1.2.1-1 - upstream release 1.2.1 - Added Unicode 5.1 support in Samyak-Devanagari From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121048.n0CAm82W029099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-12 05:48:07 EDT --- Fixed in 0.5-11 (rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121048.n0CAm9XD029126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 11:43:58 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-9 tetex-font-kerkis.spec,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20090112114358.D62B070123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14361 Modified Files: tetex-font-kerkis.spec Log Message: Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-kerkis.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-9/tetex-font-kerkis.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- tetex-font-kerkis.spec 4 Jan 2008 12:45:06 -0000 1.18 +++ tetex-font-kerkis.spec 12 Jan 2009 11:43:58 -0000 1.19 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: tetex-font-kerkis Version: 2.0 -Release: 15%{?dist} +Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing License: LPPL @@ -45,11 +45,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{tfm,type1,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,tfm,type1,vf}/%{fontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{map,enc}/dvips/%{texpkg} install -p -m 644 tex/{*.sty,*.fd} %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ install -p -m 644 tfm/*.tfm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath}/ +install -p -m 644 afm/*.afm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 type1/*.pfb %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 vf/*.vf %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 dvips/*.map %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg}/ @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ %doc License.txt README.html %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} %{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg} @@ -89,6 +91,8 @@ %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-16 +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) * Fri Jan 4 2008 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-15 - Drop requirement for -fonts. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 11:44:24 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-10 tetex-font-kerkis.spec,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20090112114424.6BF7370123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14397 Modified Files: tetex-font-kerkis.spec Log Message: Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-kerkis.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-10/tetex-font-kerkis.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- tetex-font-kerkis.spec 4 Jan 2008 12:45:06 -0000 1.18 +++ tetex-font-kerkis.spec 12 Jan 2009 11:43:54 -0000 1.19 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: tetex-font-kerkis Version: 2.0 -Release: 15%{?dist} +Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing License: LPPL @@ -45,11 +45,12 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{tfm,type1,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,tfm,type1,vf}/%{fontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{map,enc}/dvips/%{texpkg} install -p -m 644 tex/{*.sty,*.fd} %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ install -p -m 644 tfm/*.tfm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath}/ +install -p -m 644 afm/*.afm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 type1/*.pfb %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 vf/*.vf %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath}/ install -p -m 644 dvips/*.map %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg}/ @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ %doc License.txt README.html %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} %{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath} %{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg} @@ -89,6 +91,8 @@ %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-16 +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) * Fri Jan 4 2008 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-15 - Drop requirement for -fonts. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121146.n0CBkPP0009370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-12 06:46:24 EDT --- Fixed in 2.0-16 (rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121146.n0CBkQMM009395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477462, which changed state. Bug 477462 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 12 11:46:08 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel tetex-font-kerkis.spec,1.18,1.19 Message-ID: <20090112114608.DECE170123@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14662 Modified Files: tetex-font-kerkis.spec Log Message: - Restructure spec file according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes (bug #477462) - Split package to cm-lgc-fonts (.pfb and .afm) and tetex-font-cm-lgc (TeX stuff) - Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) Index: tetex-font-kerkis.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel/tetex-font-kerkis.spec,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- tetex-font-kerkis.spec 4 Jan 2008 12:45:06 -0000 1.18 +++ tetex-font-kerkis.spec 12 Jan 2009 11:45:38 -0000 1.19 @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ -%define ctan_date 20051007 -%define texmf %{_datadir}/texmf -%define texfonts %{texmf}/fonts -%define texpkg kerkis -%define fontpath %{texpkg} +%define ctan_date 20051007 +%define texmf %{_datadir}/texmf +%define texfonts %{texmf}/fonts +%define texpkg kerkis +%define texfontpath %{texpkg} +# definitions for fontpackages +%define fontname kerkis +%define fontpkg \-n\ %{fontname}-fonts Name: tetex-font-kerkis Version: 2.0 -Release: 15%{?dist} +Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX Group: Applications/Publishing License: LPPL @@ -15,23 +18,31 @@ # upstream source - unversioned zip file # ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/fonts/greek/kerkis.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -Requires: tetex-latex +Requires: texlive-latex kerkis-fonts = %{version}-%{release} BuildArch: noarch %description -This package contains the Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX. +TeX support files for the Kerkis Type 1 font. -These fonts are particularly useful for typesetting Greek. The -Greek repertoire includes full support for polytonic Greek, Greek -numerals, and double forms of several letters that occur in variant -forms. +%define fontpkg \-n\ kerkis-fonts +%package %{fontpkg} +Summary: Kerkis Type1 fonts +Group: User Interface/X + +%description %{fontpkg} +Kerkis type 1 fonts for LaTeX. These fonts are particularly useful +for typesetting Greek. The Greek repertoire includes full support for +polytonic Greek, Greek numerals, and double forms of several letters +that occur in variant forms. The Latin part of the font comprise old style numbers, accented Latin characters and common ligatures (including frequently omitted ligatures such as "fj"). -Please see the file "License.txt" for details on the use of this font. + +%_font_pkg -n %{fontpkg} *.pfb *.afm + %prep @@ -45,50 +56,72 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{tfm,type1,vf}/%{fontpath} +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{afm,tfm,type1,vf}/%{texfontpath} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/{map,enc}/dvips/%{texpkg} install -p -m 644 tex/{*.sty,*.fd} %{buildroot}%{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg}/ -install -p -m 644 tfm/*.tfm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 type1/*.pfb %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath}/ -install -p -m 644 vf/*.vf %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath}/ +install -p -m 644 tfm/*.tfm %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/tfm/%{texfontpath}/ +install -p -m 644 vf/*.vf %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/vf/%{texfontpath}/ install -p -m 644 dvips/*.map %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg}/ install -p -m 644 dvips/*.enc %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/enc/dvips/%{texpkg}/ +#install .pfb and .afm files in %{_fontdir} as per the fedora font guidelines +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p type1/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p afm/* %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +pushd %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +for pfb_file in *.pfb ; do + ln -s %{_fontdir}/$pfb_file %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/type1/%{texfontpath}/$pfb_file +done +for afm_file in *.afm ; do + ln -s %{_fontdir}/$afm_file %{buildroot}%{texfonts}/afm/%{texfontpath}/$afm_file +done +popd + %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %post -/usr/bin/texhash -conffile="$(/usr/bin/texconfig-sys conf | /bin/grep updmap.cfg)" +texhash +conffile="$(texconfig-sys conf | grep updmap.cfg)" if [ "$1" = "1" ]; then - /usr/bin/updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --enable Map %{texpkg}.map + updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --enable Map %{texpkg}.map fi %postun -conffile="$(/usr/bin/texconfig-sys conf | /bin/grep updmap.cfg)" +conffile="$(texconfig-sys conf | grep updmap.cfg)" if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - /usr/bin/updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --disable %{texpkg}.map + updmap-sys --quiet --nohash --cnffile ${conffile} --disable %{texpkg}.map fi -/usr/bin/texhash +texhash %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc License.txt README.html %{texmf}/tex/latex/%{texpkg} -%{texfonts}/tfm/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/type1/%{fontpath} -%{texfonts}/vf/%{fontpath} +%{texfonts}/afm/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/tfm/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/type1/%{texfontpath} +%{texfonts}/vf/%{texfontpath} %{texfonts}/map/dvips/%{texpkg} %{texfonts}/enc/dvips/%{texpkg} %changelog +* Mon Jan 12 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-16 +- Restructure spec file according to + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes + (bug #477462) +- Split package to cm-lgc-fonts (.pfb and .afm) and tetex-font-cm-lgc + (TeX stuff) +- Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions) + * Fri Jan 4 2008 Sarantis Paskalis - 2.0-15 - Drop requirement for -fonts. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479673] New: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673 Summary: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's by eclipse Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In Fedora 10, when I set the system locale to fa_IR (Persian Language) and log in to gnome many things are larger which results in an ugly desktop. Gnome panel's minimum height which is 24 in en_US locale is 29 in fa_IS locale. Windows' title bars are also are larger (more height). The worst thing is that these sizes do not depend on the selected font! Totally, the desktop is uglier in fa_IR locale. Things are still not that bad till now, but in Eclipse when you enable "show print margin" option in its text editor settings, the line which is intended to show the 80 character margin appears in the middle of the editor, around character 50. In en_US locale, it appears in the correct position. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In the gdm login screen, select Persian language and login 2.You can see that gnome applet is larger, and larger icons appear in it as a result 3.Run eclipse and enable "show print margin", in its text editor preferences. 4. The print margin in eclipse appears in the middle of the text editor area, which is around character 50, while it should appear at the end of 80th character. Expected results: Normal window sizes and correct estimation of print margin in eclipse text editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121337.n0CDbgNd002626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-12 08:37:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/serafettin-fonts-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) I also made a wiki page for this font: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Serafettin_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121350.n0CDo6kk002227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #14 from Adam Goode 2009-01-12 08:50:05 EDT --- Upstream was very fast in responding. They say it is unacceptable to remove DejaVu support, so I will probably have to package Type1 DejaVu. I can then patch htmldoc to use the URW fonts and use popen to call t1ascii at runtime. That should fix things up for now. Ultimately, htmldoc should use fontconfig, but I think that is long term since (correct me if I'm wrong) htmldoc would have to learn to directly read more font formats for this to be useful. Currently it only reads afm/pfa files and it hardcodes the FontName, so that it doesn't really need to parse or process the font files themselves, only embed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121357.n0CDvUik003554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477433, which changed state. Bug 477433 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121357.n0CDvTOn003529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |nted-1.4.17-2.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-12 08:57:28 EDT --- I think this should be fixed in nted-1.4.17-2.fc11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1046825 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 14:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121415.n0CEFAoc010699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 09:15:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Ultimately, htmldoc should use fontconfig, but I think that is long term since > (correct me if I'm wrong) htmldoc would have to learn to directly read more > font formats for this to be useful. I think you can specify the font formats you can handle in your fontconfig queries so this part should not be a blocker (ping behdad if you want more info) That takes care of the symlinking stuff but still requires availability of fonts in one of the formats the app understands. > Currently it only reads afm/pfa files and > it hardcodes the FontName, so that it doesn't really need to parse or process > the font files themselves, only embed. Also we have lots of OTF fonts in the distro and OTF is the Type1 successor (should be all CFF data inside), so it may be easier for upstream so add support for OTF instead of TTF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121526.n0CFQQ73026806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-12 10:26:24 EDT --- Woo, looks like 0263-fix-fontconfig-handling.diff in latest qt-copy patches may finally address this upstream, so can try/test removing our local qt-x11-opensource-src-4.3.4-no-hardcoded-font-aliases.patch I'll test it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121619.n0CGJo2F003808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #3 from Lyos Gemini Norezel 2009-01-12 11:19:49 EDT --- Updates are in koji now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 16:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121619.n0CGJUiA006076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #2 from Lyos Gemini Norezel 2009-01-12 11:19:29 EDT --- Updates are in Koji now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121812.n0CICJ4w027486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-12 13:12:18 EDT --- Licensing history looks clean, I will assume it is unless evidence to the contrary appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121920.n0CJK1Q9008717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-12 14:20:00 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478748] Fails to install python-twyt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121928.n0CJS0Yw011304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-12 14:27:59 EDT --- yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122104.n0CL4i4o002013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 21:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122159.n0CLxgna014219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 16:59:41 EDT --- If spot is ok with the package I'm ok too. Full review (going a bit deeper than usual since you're also upstream) 1. Maybe change the summary to "A sans-serif cartoon font" 2. No need to write about ISO-8859-1 in the description, you'll increase the coverage with time (I hope) and then get stuck with a wrong summary (please target MES-1 coverage at least) 3. Please wrap your description at 79 columns, not 60 4. There is no need to go at such lengths to make the rpmlint relative warning go away http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#rpmlint_complains_of_absolute_symbolic_links.21 5. please make your package name match the font name (if it is Serafettin Cartoon, name the package serafettin-cartoon-fonts) ????? 6. consider using the .txt extension for your documentation files, that makes GUI users much happier 7. It's a good idea to add a fontlog.txt that traces the font history 8. your package says it's at 0.4 but the font files say they're at 0.3. Don't do that (a good trick is to have a version variable in your makefile and change the generated font version to this variable at build time, cf dejavu and liberation) 9. please ask on the fontforge mailing list how to change the FStype so the restricted font warning goes away. Most people will take it as the font not being really gpl 10. Please specify the GPL version(s) in the font metadata (v1, v2, v2+, v3, etc) (and no need to write it's under the GPL twice in the copyright field) 11. the subfamily/style ttf name in the main file seems wrong 12. More generally it looks like you still need to clean up your font metadata a bit more 13. rawhide fontforge complains about misplaced mu in the font files 14. should probably not be classified as a sans-serif font in the fontconfig file, but as a cursive or decorative one (your OS/2 metadata says it's decorative, but fontforge classifies Comic Sans MS as cursive=script in OS/2 speak) 15. please look at the substitution-font-template template in fontpackages-devel to tell fontconfig to use your font instead of TSCu_Comic when a document requests TSCu_Comic and it's not installed on-system 16. a font with Tamil glyphs should use 65 fontconfig prio at least 17. you can use http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0B80.pdf to place the tamil glyphs on the right unicode points, it would be a shame to lose them 18. adding some info in the readme on what a Serafettin is would be nice for us not in the know Apart from the package name there's nothing blocking or that can't be handled upstream, so I'll tentatively approve the package. But please change its name before filling in the CVS request ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Reassigning the request, my part is now done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-fonts - Comic Sans fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122204.n0CM4jrE012809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 17:04:44 EDT --- (also you can probably get yourself fedorahosted if you'd like to, and share the fedora fonts mailing list with lohit, liberation and the fonts sig) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122250.n0CMoTR0022371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477417, which changed state. Bug 477417 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477417 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 22:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477417] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122250.n0CMoSre022345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477417 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-12 17:50:27 EDT --- Lincity-ng-data only had one font in it, a copy of DejaVu Sans. It is now deleting that file during %install and making a symlink (and Requires: dejavu-fonts-sans). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122309.n0CN9E2p025859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122307.n0CN7gOg029143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2009-01-12 18:07:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328799) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328799) freefont.spec Nicolas - Can you comment on this updated spec? Not really sure what the appropriate font name for this package is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122324.n0CNOkGC032214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122324.n0CNOe9V032134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:24:38 EDT --- Thank you for working on this I realise it's not easy to be the first TEX packager to adapt your packages. Anyway, some QA feedback: 1. you need to add the template (build)requires on fontpackages* for build mock/koji to work 2. you have several different font families in this package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_this_font_family_thing.3F Each one needs a separate font subpackage http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#How_many_font_files_can_I_put_in_a_font_.28sub.29package.3F 3. since you'll have multiple font subpackages, you need to create a common subpackage they depend on that will own the font package directory and the fonts COPYING 4. I'm not sure your (duplicated) %define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts is a good idea then. 5. are you sure you can not use a subpackages named srpmname-foo? Removing the srpmname prefix will confuse users. 6. some fontconfig files would be nice, there are good templates in fontpackages-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122330.n0CNU8HE001055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:30:06 EDT --- You need to use the %_font_pkg macro http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_a_compliant_font_.28sub.29package.3F I'm sure this will make your task easier and simplify your spec considerably For examples, see the dejavu, vera, mgopen, abyssinica etc packages As for the naming, my suggested guideline is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#How_should_I_name_my_fonts_.28sub.29package.28s.29.3F but FPC is discussing changes to it. spot has probably the best view on what the final rules are likely to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122341.n0CNfFtG032251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477462, which changed state. Bug 477462 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122341.n0CNfEhA032227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:41:12 EDT --- Needs at least part of the fixes pointed in cm-lgc (don't have time to do a thorough check on this one, sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477433] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122343.n0CNhaXm003592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:43:35 EDT --- Looks ok. Since FPC is still discussing font packages naming details, -fonts is fine for now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122350.n0CNogQg001350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:50:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Some darkgarden QA > Also there are simple fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel that only > require filling of your font name, so it may be a good idea to add one to your > package Forget this part, that's me needing to stop looking at spec files for a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122348.n0CNmUN5004537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:48:29 EDT --- Some darkgarden QA You should not need the %{_fontdir}/*.ttf line That's the source of this build warning warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/darkgarden/DarkGarden.ttf Also there are simple fontconfig templates in fontpackages-devel that only require filling of your font name, so it may be a good idea to add one to your package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 23:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122356.n0CNuem5002502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 18:56:39 EDT --- You need to remove the %{_fontdir}/foo*.ttf lines from your files section or the fonts will be duplicated in the common subpackage which is not what we want -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130041.n0D0fvTJ014569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-12 19:41:55 EDT --- Have you test on non Firefox (or similar like epiphany)? Firefox has pango. Also, please turn off anti-aliasing before testing. I could only fix hinting but not how pango operates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130056.n0D0u87p013366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-12 19:56:07 EDT --- Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph you feel is ugly? Personally I feel 'R' looks similar as other characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 01:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130106.n0D16h94019173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 Alexei Podtelezhnikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apodtele at ucsd.edu --- Comment #21 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-01-12 20:06:39 EDT --- Are we making progress on bug 355271, or http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57485 ? That'd be cool and highly anticipated! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 01:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130147.n0D1leNM022331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-12 20:47:40 EDT --- Rahul what is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130606.n0D663c2011802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:06:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #233257 +++ > > Description of problem: > Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0C9D+U0CCA and U0C9D+U0CCB. > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 > > How reproducible: > 1. Every Time > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Open gnome-character-map. > 2. Select U0C9D followed by U0CCA followed by U0C9D followed by U0CCB. > > Actual results: > As shown in the attached image > > Expected results: > > As shown by the following steps: > 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. i tried this font it is not a valid unicode font all kannada characters are pasted on Latin Unicode positions, i doubt this is done for transliteration purpose There is no characters on Kannada unicode code point, so i think it will default show Lohit Kannada for Kannada character display -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130615.n0D6FvM6013612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:15:57 EDT --- is this ISCII/ISFOC based fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130631.n0D6VG61011628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:31:15 EDT --- tested same combination in F10 for gedit things working fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130635.n0D6Zf5V012352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |8 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:35:41 EDT --- mistakenly changed version from F8 to F10 reverting back -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130633.n0D6X3oY016293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:33:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328837) attachemnt showing unicode combination 0c9d-0cca-0c9d-0ccb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130740.n0D7eS3a028893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 02:40:27 EDT --- updates specs built is for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 13 07:42:47 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090113074247.AEC951F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 13 07:42:50 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090113074250.89D5C1F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130742.n0D7gkkk029170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 02:42:45 EDT --- removed needinfo flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130859.n0D8xhRr007063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-13 03:59:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list hi, I've asked. No reply till date. No help on the IRC too. I'll try looking elsewhere. Any suggestions? Also,I havent packaged a multi font yet so it will take me a while to understand the new spec. I'll refer the fonts already packaged and get it done as quickly as possible. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130857.n0D8vTl0012197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-13 03:57:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > > The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I > > dint quite get that. > > You did ok, I've tried to clarify the wiki page ping me if it's still unclear > > > Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: > > symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf > > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" > > This is an rpmlint of dubious utility that will be discussed by FPC soonish. In > the meanwhile, ignore it > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 > > Please make your fontconfig file adhere more closely to the basic template in > fontpackages-devel. > > Otherwise, everything else seems fine hi, I have the package installed. I dont know the location of the templates :( . Can you tell me where these are located? I was still referring to the ones i had downloaded earlier. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130909.n0D99Hjr015260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 04:09:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have the package installed. I dont know the location of the templates :( rpm -ql packagename will get you the file listing in packagename -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130911.n0D9BmIx010641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 04:11:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > PS for the fontforge warning, ask on the fontforge mailing list > I've asked. No reply till date. No help on the IRC too. I'll try looking > elsewhere. Any suggestions? You can try to ask eimai or moyogo on #dejavu. Otherwise, not idea :(. > Also,I havent packaged a multi font yet so it will take me a while to > understand the new spec. I'll refer the fonts already packaged and get it done > as quickly as possible. Ok. There should be plenty of examples to take inspiration from in rawhide right now (dejavu, vera, mgopen, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130941.n0D9frVx022679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 04:41:52 EDT --- They are more or less modifications of the same type. Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130942.n0D9g0ae022701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 04:41:59 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for working on this I realise it's not easy to be the first TEX > packager to adapt your packages. Anyway, some QA feedback: > > 1. you need to add the template (build)requires on fontpackages* for build > mock/koji to work Bah, I would swear I had them in earlier versions. Will fix. > 2. you have several different font families in this package. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_this_font_family_thing.3F > > Each one needs a separate font subpackage > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#How_many_font_files_can_I_put_in_a_font_.28sub.29package.3F I am aware of that. However, the separation of the font families is a somewhat more difficult problem (the filenames are not so intuitive), so I left them to a later point in time. Well, ok I will give it a shot, since I already did it to mgopen-fonts. > 3. since you'll have multiple font subpackages, you need to create a common > subpackage they depend on that will own the font package directory and the > fonts COPYING OK. > 4. I'm not sure your (duplicated) %define fontpkg \-n\ cm-lgc-fonts is a good > idea then. Thanks for pointing to the duplication. What I was trying to do is having a subpackage name in line with other font packages (such as mgopen-fonts) instead of (te)tex-font-cm-lgc). Since a rename of the package is in order, and the font packages already carry the %{fontname}-fonts name, cm-lgc-fonts fits for the srpm name, cm-lgc-fonts-common, cm-lgc-fonts-roman, etc for the different families, and tex-fonts-cm-lgc for the TeX specific stuff. I think that would be the straightforward way of dealing with the mess The alternative would be to call the srpm tex-fonts-cm-lgc and suffix it with -common, -roman, -sans, etc. This, however, leads to names such as tex-font-cm-lgc-roman, which is not compatible with the rest of the fedora font packages. > 5. are you sure you can not use a subpackages named srpmname-foo? Removing the > srpmname prefix will confuse users. See above. > 6. some fontconfig files would be nice, there are good templates in > fontpackages-devel OK, I will come up with some fontconfig stuff for the families only (the encodings are a really dark area). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131036.n0DAavpC003090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 05:36:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Since a > rename of the package is in order Since IIRC the TEX packagers are preparing a mass rename TEX-side, and FPC is discussing changing the font package naming conventions to make them more "consistent", it's probably a good idea to discuss all this with spot so all the conflicting requirements may be made to fit somehow Or you'll need another rename run later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 11:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131113.n0DBD2EW010891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #7 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 06:13:01 EDT --- I see. The current package is named tetex-font-cm-lgc. My proposal is to name the base package cm-lgc-fonts, split into subpackages cm-lgc-fonts-roman, cm-lgc-fonts-sans, cm-lgc-fonts-typewriter and cm-lgc-fonts-common. The TeX specific stuff is put in a subpackage name tex-fonts-cm-lgc (note that it is not a suffix of the main package, but I think the main focus of this package is the font itself rather than the enhancement of TeX). I am open to suggestions. Anyway, my altered specfile (and srpm) is currenly at http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/any/rpms/cm-lgc-fonts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 11:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131156.n0DBuQKo019228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 06:56:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I see. > > The current package is named tetex-font-cm-lgc. > My proposal is to name the base package cm-lgc-fonts, split into subpackages > cm-lgc-fonts-roman, cm-lgc-fonts-sans, cm-lgc-fonts-typewriter and > cm-lgc-fonts-common. The TeX specific stuff is put in a subpackage name > tex-fonts-cm-lgc (note that it is not a suffix of the main package, but I think > the main focus of this package is the font itself rather than the enhancement > of TeX). I'd rather avoid putting the affix used to identify pure font packages in a pure TEX package, but I guess it's ok here. @spot: Another solution would be to make have all binary font (sub)packages named srpmname-fontname-font so we could have srpm cm-lgc-fonts rpm cm-lgc-fonts-common (directory ownership, licensing files and other doc) cm-lgc-fonts-fontname1-font cm-lgc-fonts-fontname2-font ... cm-lgc-fonts-fontnameX-font cm-lgc-fonts-tex (TEX parts) this way every pure font package could end in -font, and every pure tex package in -tex The only drawback is that for font packages that contain a single font family you'll have to force subpackaging and accept redundant naming like srpm gfs-olga-fonts rpm gfs-olga-fonts-olga-font But it should work in all cases and produce consistent names. Including in non-font srpms srpm openoffice.org rpm openoffice.org-opensymbol-font (Another variant for single-font packages would be to use srpm gfs-olga-fonts rpm gfs-olga-font forcing a renaming but probably not too confusing to users) There are many possible choices, and they all fail if not applied consistently, so I hope FPC settles on one before each packager chooses a different option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131209.n0DC9UgZ015865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-13 07:09:30 EDT --- As Pravin said (Comment 5), the example font given is not a unicode/opentype font. Thus it is not possible to understand correct rendering required for the case. Please provide the correct screenshot of expected output. Also, as the EOL for f8 is already reached the bug cannot be filed against f8, please make so making version to 'rawhide'. Please update if the bug is present in the current version of the font and fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131235.n0DCZexI022059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-13 07:35:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > rpm > cm-lgc-fonts-common (directory ownership, licensing files and other doc) > cm-lgc-fonts-fontname1-font > cm-lgc-fonts-fontname2-font > ... > cm-lgc-fonts-fontnameX-font > cm-lgc-fonts-tex (TEX parts) (I am not sure this discussion belongs here, but this is the only proposal I am not really confortable with). I don't like the repetition of the f* word (font), so I would prefer it appears only once (I don't mind where). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131242.n0DCgC9t023471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-13 07:42:10 EDT --- The brhknd font mentioned is not a unicode/opentype font. Please provide correct screenshots instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 13:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131304.n0DD4vZY002145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 08:04:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > rpm > > cm-lgc-fonts-common (directory ownership, licensing files and other doc) > > cm-lgc-fonts-fontname1-font > > cm-lgc-fonts-fontname2-font > > ... > > cm-lgc-fonts-fontnameX-font > > cm-lgc-fonts-tex (TEX parts) > > (I am not sure this discussion belongs here, @spot: I don't really know where the discussion is now that FPC has started working on it either :( I hope spot does something with all the info I CC him) > but this is the only proposal I am > not really comfortable with). I don't like the repetition of the f* word > (font), so I would prefer it appears only once (I don't mind where). I guess we could do something like srpm cm-lgc-fonts rpm cm-lgc-fonts-common (directory ownership, licensing files and other doc) cm-lgc-fontname1-font cm-lgc-fontname2-font ... cm-lgc-fontnameX-font cm-lgc-tex (TEX parts) srpm gfs-olga-fonts rpm gfs-olga-font srpm dejavu-fonts rpm dejavu-fonts-common dejavu-sans-font dejavu-serif-font dejavu-sans-mono-font srpm openoffice.org rpm openoffice.org-opensymbol-font (and openoffice.org-name2-font + openoffice.org-fonts common if it ever grows another font) It is more ?sthetically pleasing, but implies many packages where rpmname != srpm-name-foo. Though the variation is small enough that users could probably not notice. However that may make it a bit harder to document in guidelines Also that sort of breaks if you have a srpm named foo-fonts and a srpm named foo in the repo (don't think that's the case right now, may happen) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 14:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131424.n0DEOW26014356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-13 09:24:31 EDT --- That's a completely separate issue, please comment in bug 355271, not here. (And no, AFAIK it's not being worked on.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 15:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131501.n0DF1I0e023613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-13 10:01:16 EDT --- qt-copy patch tests out good here, local hack/patch removed in qt-4.4.3-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132030.n0DKU4C4030525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |serafettin-fonts - Comic |serafettin-cartoon-fonts - |Sans fonts |Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-13 15:30:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: serafettin-cartoon-fonts Short Description: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 20:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132038.n0DKcE65007068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-13 15:38:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From oget at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 13 21:34:09 2009 From: oget at fedoraproject.org (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090113213409.1B23F7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15264/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5-1_fc10:HEAD:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm:1231882386 --- NEW FILE serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec --- %define fontname serafettin-cartoon %define fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename %{name}-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.5 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://serafettin.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/serafettin/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Serafettin aims to be a collection of free Latin fonts for daily usage. Currently it contains a free cartoon sans-serif font. It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build make %{?_smp_flags} %install rm -fr %{buildroot} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{fontname}.conf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc ChangeLog.txt COPYING.txt FONTLOG.txt README.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +41a8673cb16fe0597eb5ef5c76a8336b serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 From oget at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 13 21:35:54 2009 From: oget at fedoraproject.org (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9 import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090113213554.10C287013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15650/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5-1_fc10:F-9:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm:1231882487 --- NEW FILE serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec --- %define fontname serafettin-cartoon %define fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename %{name}-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.5 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://serafettin.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/serafettin/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Serafettin aims to be a collection of free Latin fonts for daily usage. Currently it contains a free cartoon sans-serif font. It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build make %{?_smp_flags} %install rm -fr %{buildroot} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{fontname}.conf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc ChangeLog.txt COPYING.txt FONTLOG.txt README.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 21:35:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 13 Jan 2009 21:35:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +41a8673cb16fe0597eb5ef5c76a8336b serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 From oget at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 13 21:37:20 2009 From: oget at fedoraproject.org (Orcan Ogetbil) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090113213720.A75CB7013F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: oget Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15968/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release --- NEW FILE import.log --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5-1_fc10:F-10:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm:1231882586 --- NEW FILE serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec --- %define fontname serafettin-cartoon %define fontconf 66-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename %{name}-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.5 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://serafettin.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/serafettin/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Serafettin aims to be a collection of free Latin fonts for daily usage. Currently it contains a free cartoon sans-serif font. It is based on Thukkaram Gopalrao's TSCu_Comic of tamillinux project. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} %build make %{?_smp_flags} %install rm -fr %{buildroot} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{fontname}.conf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc ChangeLog.txt COPYING.txt FONTLOG.txt README.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Tue Jan 13 2009 - 0.5-1 - New version with various fixes suggested by review in RHBZ#479596 * Sun Jan 11 2009 - 0.4-1 - New version with a name change (comic -> cartoon) * Sun Dec 28 2008 - 0.3-1 - Initial release Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 13 Jan 2009 21:36:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 13 Jan 2009 20:38:31 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 13 Jan 2009 21:36:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +41a8673cb16fe0597eb5ef5c76a8336b serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132155.n0DLtCXg016318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-13 16:55:11 EDT --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 22:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447298] Qt 4 uses Nimbus Sans L (Helvetica) instead of DejaVu Sans (Sans Serif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132240.n0DMeYa6032625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298 --- Comment #24 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-01-13 17:40:33 EDT --- Re: Comment #22 I am sorry I pointed out that this bug that you reported was likely related to the bug I reported a year earlier. Just like in my bug 355271, you first didn't realize that the problem is because Qt essentially ignores fontconfig. And this is exactly the same conclusion I reached in te earlier bug. So I beg to differ. The root cause of the problems is the same! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 23:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132327.n0DNRQ0T009456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-13 18:27:25 EDT --- After a mail exchange with Tom the new naming rules will probably look like that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) As your package is one of the most complex naming-wise please check you're ok with the proposal (or suggest amendments) As for the split in subpackages, please note that http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 explicitelly authorises grouping of "font families which are designed to extend other font families with larger Unicode coverage", so you don't need to create a different subpackage for all the regional parts of CM roman, for example (though the fontconfig part will probably need some work with behdad) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Jan 13 23:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090113234823.21F6F23F504@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roozbeh at gmail.com ------- Comment #4 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-13 23:48 UTC ------- Saw this in the roadmap: GNOME Character Map * Ability to print charts of characters with pangocairo Assuming this is the bug, just wanted to say that any printed charts may not use the same layout used by the Unicode Consortium, as they consider it copyrighted. Just use a different layout. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 14 02:05:27 2009 From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/doulos-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 doulos-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20090114020527.8EA6F70136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21116 Modified Files: .cvsignore doulos-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Jan 13 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-1 - Update main font to 4.104 (with Unicode 5.1 support) - Remove Doulos Literacy (not maintained anymore) - Last update before conversion to new fonts policy Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- .cvsignore 11 Dec 2007 14:17:36 -0000 1.6 +++ .cvsignore 14 Jan 2009 02:04:57 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,2 +1 @@ -DoulosSIL4.100.zip -DoulosSILLit4.0.14.r1.zip +DoulosSIL4.104.zip Index: doulos-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel/doulos-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- doulos-fonts.spec 11 Dec 2007 14:17:36 -0000 1.6 +++ doulos-fonts.spec 14 Jan 2009 02:04:57 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/doulos -%define litversion 4.0.14 +%define docversion 4.100 Name: doulos-fonts -Version: 4.100 +Version: 4.104 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Doulos SIL fonts @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ URL: http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSILFont # Sources can be downloaded from http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSIL_download#FontsDownload Source0: DoulosSIL%{version}.zip -Source1: DoulosSILLit%{litversion}.r1.zip BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch @@ -23,9 +22,8 @@ %prep -%setup -q -c -a 1 -mv 0NRSI/RFS/documentation/DoulosSILLiteracy/FONTLOG.txt FONTLOG-Literacy.txt -mv DoulosSILLiteracy/*.ttf . +%setup -q -c +mv DoulosSIL/* . %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' *.txt @@ -59,14 +57,19 @@ %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc FONTLOG.txt FONTLOG-Literacy.txt OFL.txt OFL-FAQ.txt README.txt -%doc DoulosSIL%{version}FontDocumentation.pdf +%doc FONTLOG.txt OFL.txt OFL-FAQ.txt README.txt +%doc DoulosSIL%{docversion}FontDocumentation.pdf %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/*.ttf %changelog +* Tue Jan 13 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-1 +- Update main font to 4.104 (with Unicode 5.1 support) +- Remove Doulos Literacy (not maintained anymore) +- Last update before conversion to new fonts policy + * Tue Dec 11 2007 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.100-1 - Update main font to 4.100, keep old Doulos Literacy which is latest - Change license tag to OFL Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- sources 11 Dec 2007 14:17:36 -0000 1.6 +++ sources 14 Jan 2009 02:04:57 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,2 +1 @@ -0f043d34dd190259b64d57a501173c92 DoulosSIL4.100.zip -c7cac6597ed75f4df89a9579a5d0e419 DoulosSILLit4.0.14.r1.zip +b11373034e7e417b6e00b394c8da7f67 DoulosSIL4.104.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140301.n0E31W8U017200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state. Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140301.n0E31UUG017161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #15 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-13 22:01:27 EDT --- The problem seems to still exist with latest fontforge in F10 (fontforge-20080828-1.fc10). I have it and it makes fontforge totally unusable. I build an RPM for myself based on devel, removing the libspiro dependency, and everything worked fine (with a nicer font for the UI). Kevin, would you consider pushing the devel version to F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 14 04:48:08 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.29,1.30 Message-ID: <20090114044808.777D070136@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6413 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jan 14 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Included _font_pkg macro to conform new font packaging guidelines. - Tidy up .spec file. Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.29 retrieving revision 1.30 diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30 --- cjkunifonts.spec 8 Jan 2009 07:00:44 -0000 1.29 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 14 Jan 2009 04:47:38 -0000 1.30 @@ -1,21 +1,20 @@ %define fontname cjkunifonts -%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} -%define archivename %{name}-%{version} %define common_desc \ -Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from the original fonts generously made \available by Arphic Technology under the "Arphic Public License" and extended \ -by the CJK Unifonts project. +Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from original fonts made available by \ +Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by the CJK \ +Unifonts project. -%define umingbuilddir ../%{name}-uming-%{version} -%define ukaibuilddir ../%{name}-ukai-%{version} -%define umingfontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-uming -%define ukaifontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name}-ukai -%define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} +%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d +%define umingbuilddir %{name}-uming-%{version} +%define ukaibuilddir %{name}-ukai-%{version} + Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 12%{?dist} -Summary: Chinese TrueType Fonts -- Simplified and Traditional Chinese Ming and Kai Face +Release: 13%{?dist} +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/CJKUnifonts @@ -38,7 +37,7 @@ %common_desc %package uming -Summary: Chinese Uming style face TrueType Font +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -49,11 +48,36 @@ %description uming %common_desc -Chinese Uming style face TrueType Font derived from the original fonts released -by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. +Ming face Chinese Unicode TrueType font derived from the original fonts \ +released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. + +%_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc + +# remaining uming files +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/license +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.pdf +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/FONTLOG +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/INSTALL +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README +%doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf +%{catalogue}/%{name} %package ukai -Summary: Chinese Ukai style face TrueType font +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -64,162 +88,102 @@ %description ukai %common_desc -Chinese Ukai style face TrueType Font derived from the original fonts released -by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. +Kai face Chinese Unicode TrueType font derived from the original fonts \ +released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. + +%_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc + +# remaining ukai files +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/license +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.pdf +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/FONTLOG +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/INSTALL +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README +%doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW +%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{catalogue}/%{name} %prep -%setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{name}-uming-%{version} +%setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 -%setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{name}-ukai-%{version} +%setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir} %build %{nil} %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} +%__rm -rf %{buildroot} -# dirs -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} - -# ttfs -install -m 0644 %{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir}/ +# *.ttc(ttf) +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} -o %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale -mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{umingfontdir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} -o %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale -mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{ukaifontdir} - -# fontconfig config files -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} - -cd %{umingbuilddir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +# *.conf +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +cd ../%{umingbuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ && \ - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf && \ - cd - + %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ + %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done -cd %{ukaibuilddir} +cd ../%{ukaibuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do - install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - cd %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/ && \ - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf $fconf && \ - cd - + %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ + %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done cd - -# backward compat -install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%{__ln_s} ../../%{name}-uming/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf - -# catalogue -%{__ln_s} %{umingfontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming -%{__ln_s} %{ukaifontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai +# backward compat to obsoleted ttf +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType +%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf # ghostscript -install -d %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir} -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ - -%clean -rm -fr ${buildroot} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{gsdir} +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ -%post uming -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{umingfontdir} -fi - -%post ukai -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{ukaifontdir} -fi - -%postun uming -if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - -%postun ukai -if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - -%files uming -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/license -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.pdf -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/FONTLOG -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/INSTALL -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/NEWS -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/README -%doc %{umingbuilddir}/TODO -%dir %{umingfontdir} -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -%dir %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN -%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%{umingfontdir}/*.ttc -%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{umingfontdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf -%{catalogue}/%{name}-uming +# catalogue +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +%__ln_s %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} -%files ukai -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/license -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.pdf -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/FONTLOG -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/INSTALL -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/README -%doc %{ukaibuilddir}/TODO -%dir %{ukaifontdir} -%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN -%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW -%{cidmapdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%{ukaifontdir}/*.ttc -%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontconfig_confdir}/*-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{ukaifontdir}/fonts.scale -%{catalogue}/%{name}-ukai +%clean +%__rm -fr ${buildroot} %changelog +* Wed Jan 14 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477373 +- Included _font_pkg macro to conform new font packaging guidelines. +- Tidy up .spec file. + * Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140451.n0E4prWc006369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-13 23:51:53 EDT --- > Kevin, would you consider pushing the devel version to F10? Well, we have talked about doing that in the past, but we need to be very carefull. fontforge is used to build a number of fonts, so we need to make sure the version we push as an update will work to build all the fonts that use it to build in F-10. Otherwise they could be in a bad place if they need to update. Perhaps we could coordinate such a move on the fonts-sig list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 05:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140521.n0E5Lmnf011795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-14 00:21:41 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this now, as the indicated build appears to fix things. Feel free to reopen if it's not working for you... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 05:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:38:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471538] FontForge Abort Opening some .otf files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140538.n0E5cPg7014581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471538 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140612.n0E6CSCY020900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #8 from Shankar Prasad 2009-01-14 01:12:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328952) Screenshot of current and correct rendering Rahul, The above said rendering is there in Lohit-Kannada also. You can have look at the screen shot attached Shankar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140633.n0E6XHeM024348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140633.n0E6XGfG024313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-14 01:33:15 EDT --- built w/ macro used http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140702.n0E728OR021172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #7 from san 2009-01-14 02:02:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph you feel is ugly? Personally I feel 'R' > looks similar as other characters. please take a look for web sshot I committed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the same black as other strokes. I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 14 07:40:58 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090114074058.3B1481F8262@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 14 07:40:58 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090114074058.143821F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140914.n0E9EFEQ014787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-14 04:14:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > After a mail exchange with Tom the new naming rules will probably look like > that > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) > > As your package is one of the most complex naming-wise please check you're ok > with the proposal (or suggest amendments) I am ok with most of the proposal. I have some doubts about the TeX-related subpackage. One is whether tex should be a prefix or a suffix. The other is whether the foundry name (ctan) should be in the package name. After all, we do not name all the perl modules perl-cpan-perlmodule. But I guess this is not so critical, can be left unspecified (it is after all a TeX related subpackage) and wait for some input from the TeX guys. (My preference would be that tex should be a prefix and the ctan deleted as in tex-cm-lgc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140930.n0E9Ux8a018901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 04:30:58 EDT --- The "ctan" bit is to be consistent with the other "foundry" prefixes. For the TEX part, since it's unlikely to be the only tex subpackage a suffix will be a lot easier to manage for you I think. But anyway please agree with other TEX guys on a naming convention there. Once the fonts naming proposal is officialized this naming example will be part of guidelines and much harder to change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140957.n0E9vpme001140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 04:57:50 EDT --- I agree with Kevin: while the problem sounds annoying it is probably safest not to update the fontforge version unless necessary. But by all means discuss on fedora-fonts-list - it would be good to have a firm policy on this. Font developers can hopefully use the build from rawhide in the meantime until F11 is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 15:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141541.n0EFfnVE019213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from James Antill 2009-01-14 10:41:48 EDT --- Can you test with the 3.2.21 yum, and see what happens? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477368] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaeOk013948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:38 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477413] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbNmJ014659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:22 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIav5g014229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:57 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477464] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc61T015452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:05 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477404] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb9pp014409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:08 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477394] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb0wg014262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:59 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477472] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcDAi015584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:12 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477471] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcCRM015559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:11 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477382] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIammP014075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:47 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477390] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIauBO014211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:55 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477487] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcPvi015821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:24 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477372] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIahW7013993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:42 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477477] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcJjG015706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:18 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477480] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcLus015744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:20 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477439] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbiQs015041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:43 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477483] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcNll015786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:22 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477424] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbXdI014852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:32 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477441] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbkld015076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:46 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477450] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbuDN015259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:55 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb2Yn014302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:01 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477442] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIblVs015098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:47 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIageN013969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:40 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaaAR013889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:35 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbswU015224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:53 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIacl8013926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:37 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477444] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIboPH015136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:49 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIab01013910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:36 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477463] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc5ad015430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:04 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbZXW014900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:34 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcMWf015765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:21 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbQSC014722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:25 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbS97014753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbTWF014782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:28 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477400] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb52m014337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:04 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbBtZ014432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:10 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcGJE015631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:15 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcE5v015607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:13 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477393] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaxOK014245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:58 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477386] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaqBP014135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:51 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcHxm015667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:16 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIak6x014038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:45 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477378] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIalpT014061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:46 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477403] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb8YY014382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:07 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbHrE014556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:16 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIajKk014017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:44 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477436] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbeam014968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:39 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477331] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaU4b013764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:28 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbgA3014989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:41 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIanHh014096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:48 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb7QJ014363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:06 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477443] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbmhE015114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:48 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477333] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaXmg013859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:33 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477459] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc15T015374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:00 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcScn015861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcB2M015539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:10 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477438] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbhbY015015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:42 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477446] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbqho015176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:51 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477457] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbxbJ015325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:58 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477398] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb43I014324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:03 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcI1W015689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:17 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbwGS015306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:57 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbrTx015194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:52 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477486] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcOnK015807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:23 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc040015349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:59 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477389] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIat27014198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:54 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcKNx015727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477422] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbVlW014807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:30 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477445] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbppN015154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:50 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbE18014479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:11 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb1l6014278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:00 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477449] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbtTw015241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:54 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc7or015474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:06 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbdjT014947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:38 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477412] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbM38014642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:21 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbvc6015275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:56 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbOZx014675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:23 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc9MR015518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:08 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477429] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbbIt014917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:36 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIasZs014163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:53 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477411] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbKT0014619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:20 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477431] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbckj014934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:37 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaYaT013876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:34 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc8nn015500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:07 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcQGN015839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:26 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbJeP014597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477418] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbPV5014696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:24 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477426] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbY6F014869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:33 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc4WB015413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:03 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477385] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIap5k014116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:50 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbjHE015059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:44 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaWVH013817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:31 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbWMu014833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:31 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbI3f014576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:17 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477407] kdelibs: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbFWV014520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:14 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc2Ui015388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:01 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141930.n0EJUMbw001874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 475661 depends on bug 475593, which changed state. Bug 475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-14 14:30:21 EDT --- I poked around this package for 2 hours now. I couldn't find any blockers. There are two minor things I think I should say: * Not a blocker but, as I say in all my reviews, I prefer using %defattr(-,root,root,-) * All fonts (including sans-serif ones) say that they are "Serif" as (OS/2) PFM-Family in fontforge. I think upstream needs notified. Other than these two, you might want to wait for the subpackage naming decision of FESCO for http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Otherwise, everything is clean ----------------------------------------------------- This package (google-droid-fonts) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141932.n0EJWwAt027344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn 2009-01-14 14:32:57 EDT --- 1.0.4-13 in rawhide drops the doxygen included font files, and instead just uses the html in the docs. ok to close? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142018.n0EKIx5T003517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 15:18:58 EDT --- I you don't have any font files in your package anymore you can close the bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477392] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142030.n0EKUuo4021139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 20:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142030.n0EKUvGt021175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477392, which changed state. Bug 477392 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 21:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142153.n0ELrcZg022271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |google-droid-fonts - The |google-droid-fonts - |Droid font set |General-purpose fonts | |released by Google as part | |of Android Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 16:53:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I poked around this package for 2 hours now. I couldn't find any blockers. > There are two minor things I think I should say: > > * Not a blocker but, as I say in all my reviews, I prefer using > %defattr(-,root,root,-) For fonts an explicit defattr is part of the guidelines since there is no reason to have fonts with strange permissions installed :p > * All fonts (including sans-serif ones) say that they are "Serif" as (OS/2) > PFM-Family in fontforge. I think upstream needs notified. Missed this, nice to know, will do > Other than these two, you might want to wait for the subpackage naming decision > of FESCO for > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) Since the changes FPC requested didn't affect srpm naming, I'll do the cvs request now. > ----------------------------------------------------- > This package (google-droid-fonts) is APPROVED by oget > ----------------------------------------------------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: google-droid-fonts Short Description: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Owners: nim Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142222.n0EMMGJ7027934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477438, which changed state. Bug 477438 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:22:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477438] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142222.n0EMME53027905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-14 17:22:14 EDT --- This package had a copy of Dustismo in it, but there's no need for it to package the font. It uses the local copy for build testing (to ensure TTF support works), but the Dustismo fonts are packaged separately. Fixed in perl-GDTextUtil-0.86-12.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142301.n0EN1MAD002141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #12 from Victor Bogado 2009-01-14 18:01:21 EDT --- The font package naming says the package name must end in "fonts" (plural) does this stay true even for packages that contain only one font without any variations? I made a new version of the spec file could you take a look? http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.3-5.bog10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142336.n0ENaACS008928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #4 from Qianqian Fang 2009-01-14 18:36:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329052) updated spec file for wqy-zenhei-fonts Let me know if this file makes sense to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142335.n0ENZ61k008714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang 2009-01-14 18:35:05 EDT --- sorry for my delay in responding to this upgrade. I used to build all the packages from a FC6 machine, and it took me a while to set up everything on a F10 virtual machine. Now everything seems to be working fine. I have a problem to compile my package (for example, wqy-zenhei-fonts) with the new spec file (attached later): "make i386" complains about missing "wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.8.34" folder, which I assume it is the definition of %{_fontdir}, right? the upstream src file only extract a wqy-zenhei folder, as other font packages from wqy. they are not named based on fedora font packages. What do you suggest me to do to get around this? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 00:21:22 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 fontpackages.spec, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090115002122.3D5E57012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1253/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.14 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 22 Dec 2008 12:31:30 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.13.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- fontpackages.spec 22 Dec 2008 12:31:30 -0000 1.4 +++ fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.13 +Version: 1.14 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -97,26 +97,34 @@ %changelog +* Wed Jan 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.13-1 +??? Update for subpackage naming changes requested by FPC + * Mon Dec 22 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.13-1 ??? Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff ??? use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place + * Sun Dec 21 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.12-2 ??? Change homepage + * Fri Dec 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.12-1 ??? Add another macro to allow building fontconfig without cycling + * Wed Dec 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.11-1 ??? Add actual fedorahosted references + * Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.10-1 ??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? + * Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.9-1 ??? fix and complete fontconfig doc -* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.8-1 ??? simplify multi spec template: codify general case - 1.7-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 22 Dec 2008 12:31:30 -0000 1.4 +++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ fontpackages-1_12-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229726060 fontpackages-1_12-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-2.fc11.src.rpm:1229863050 fontpackages-1_13-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229949018 +fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 22 Dec 2008 12:31:30 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -8d7eb82ee9fafc3f0826da58b9bb537f fontpackages-1.13.tar.bz2 +a90a6bbc2937c847fb32cad0bac41726 fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 00:28:42 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090115002842.9F80F7012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2084/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Update for new FPC naming rules Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:15:19 -0000 1.10 +++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 00:28:12 -0000 1.11 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.10 -Release: 12%{?dist} +Release: 13%{?dist} Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9 -Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono +Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %description compat This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ %package common -Summary: Bitstream Vera, common files (documentation???) +Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -49,12 +49,14 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package sans -Summary: Bitstream Vera, variable-width sans-serif font faces +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Summary: Variable-width sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description sans +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 1.10-13 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the Bitstream Vera sans-serif variable-width font @@ -63,12 +65,14 @@ %_font_pkg -n sans Vera.ttf VeraBd.ttf VeraIt.ttf VeraBI.ttf -%package serif -Summary: Bitstream Vera, variable-width serif font faces +%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts +Summary: Variable-width serif Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description serif +Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 1.10-13 + +%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the Bitstream Vera serif variable-width font faces. @@ -76,12 +80,14 @@ %_font_pkg -n serif VeraSe*ttf -%package sans-mono -Summary: Bitstream Vera, monospace sans-serif font faces +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts +Summary: Monospace sans-serif Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description sans-mono +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 1.10-13 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the Bitstream Vera sans-serif monospace font faces. Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:15:19 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 00:28:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-12.fc11.src.rpm:1229541266 +bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150211.n0F2BePG016434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-14 21:11:38 EDT --- That works fine now. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2obLN006859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 21:50:36 EDT --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479596] Review Request: serafettin-cartoon-fonts - Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150250.n0F2oe85022536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150301.n0F319no010661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 22:01:07 EDT --- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33D0q011603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 22:03:12 EDT --- openoffice.org-2.4.2-18.3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150306.n0F3689k012545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471103] Font spacing wrong in menus and text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150303.n0F33GJ1011631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471103 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477402] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150305.n0F35vwe028385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477402 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 22:05:57 EDT --- jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 07:33:36 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090115073336.E87EE1F8261@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 07:33:38 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090115073338.61DCD1F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150821.n0F8LxbK007311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 03:21:58 EDT --- To quote the new naming guideline "The use of the -fonts suffix is not dependant on the actual number of font files in the package." Also I had to change the templates and macros slightly to take into account the naming changes requested by FPC, so before it hits stable releases please use "fontpackages-*-1.14" from rawhide to test your specs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150828.n0F8Sp52008355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 03:28:50 EDT --- np, there are lots of packagers which have not started working on it yer 1. You do not need the %{_fontdir}/*.ttc line in %files 2. Do you actually need to declare the fonts in the legacy core fonts X11 system? If it's not 100% necessary life will be simpler without the fonts.scale bit 3. If you install multiple fontconfig file you must find an expression rpm accepts that can be used as argument to the -f call to %{fontconf} (generaly, using ?? or other rpm wildcards) Also please test with "fontpackages-*-1.14" from rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:31:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150831.n0F8V830025211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 03:31:06 EDT --- The "fontpackages-*-1.14" packages from rawhide (templates and macros) should enable you to respect the new naming easily (feel free to name the tex subpackage as you want) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 09:08:41 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 15 Jan 2009 09:08:41 -0000 Subject: [Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090115090841.8011.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,hdu' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed| |1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 09:08:40 +0000 2009 ------- confirmed. I guess thats a task for framework. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 12:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151237.n0FCb3VJ014026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gentium-basic-fonts - |sil-gentium-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family Flag|needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #15 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-15 07:37:00 EDT --- Here are the updates according to new font packaging guidelines: SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 14:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151458.n0FEwIkD016595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151716.n0FHGXIA019155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-15 12:16:32 EDT --- Trying to implement this using freecol as an example, running into build errors: RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %_font_pkg File must begin with "/": -n File must begin with "/": aybabtu-fonts File must begin with "/": lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/aybabtu.otf File must begin with "/": %_font_pkg File must begin with "/": -n File must begin with "/": centuryschl-fonts File must begin with "/": lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/CenturySchL*otf File must begin with "/": %_font_pkg File must begin with "/": -n File must begin with "/": emmentaler-fonts File must begin with "/": lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/emmentaler*otf File must begin with "/": %_font_pkg File must begin with "/": -n File must begin with "/": feta-fonts File must begin with "/": lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/source/feta*mf Attaching current spec. Am I missing something obvious? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151716.n0FHGvIm003407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-15 12:16:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329111) Spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151720.n0FHKBD5004255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477441, which changed state. Bug 477441 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 17:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477441] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151720.n0FHKA7T004229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-15 12:20:09 EDT --- The tex docs generation was pulling in FreeSans, although, I don't know from where, as I didn't have freefont installed, and it doesn't come with the Physfs tarball. Nevertheless, there is no good reason to package the tex docs (and font) when the html docs are just fine. Fixed in rawhide (physfs-1.0.1-9.fc11). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151802.n0FI22UX029699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-15 13:02:00 EDT --- So, given the naming scheme: "Fedora font packages are named [foundryname-][projectname-]fontfamilyname-fonts, in lowercase." The foundryname is "tiresias". The projectname is "tiresias". Upstream thinks that the familyname is "tiresias", but there are arguably five font families here: "infofont" "keyfont" "lpfont" "pcfont" "signfont" Since the naming guidelines say "When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, it should be skipped to avoid foofont-fonts packages." This means that I should skip the fontfamilyname as well. This leaves me with "tiresias-fonts", which is the current naming and packaging structure. Now, I could do: tiresias-info-fonts tiresias-key-fonts tiresias-lp-fonts tiresias-pc-fonts tiresias-sign-fonts But that would not be accurate. Please advise as to what I should do in this scenario. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151822.n0FIMQUJ001121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 13:22:25 EDT --- 1. You need to install your otf files in %{_fontdir} (you can keep the mf ones) install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} 2. Replace your %_font_pkg calls like %_font_pkg -n centuryschl-fonts lilypond/%{version}/fonts/otf/CenturySchL*otf by %_font_pkg -n centuryschl CenturySchL*otf (are the fonts really named centuryschl BTW?) 3. create a -fonts-common subpackage that will own %{_fontdir} %files fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc %dir %{_fontdir} 4. make sure you use the fontpackages version in rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78561 5. and probably add symlinks to your main package so your app still sees the otf files in the place it's used to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 18:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151852.n0FIqsDJ023813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 13:52:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > So, given the naming scheme: > > "Fedora font packages are named > [foundryname-][projectname-]fontfamilyname-fonts, in lowercase." > > The foundryname is "tiresias". The projectname is "tiresias". Right. So your font package names should be tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts instead of tiresias-tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts > Upstream thinks that the familyname is "tiresias", but there are arguably five > font families here: > "infofont" > "keyfont" > "lpfont" > "pcfont" > "signfont" Actually, it isn't the font family. I haven't repeated the definition of font family in the naming section, because it should already be introduced by the splitting rule submitted and approved before. But to repeat it from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) ? What is a font family? * A font family corresponds to one entry in GUI font lists. For example, DejaVu Sans, DejaVu Serif and DejaVu Sans Mono are three different font families. * A font family is subdivided in faces or styles. DejaVu Sans Normal, DejaVu Sans Bold, DejaVu Sans Condensed Italic are three faces of the DejaVu Sans font family. * The gnome-font-viewer command can be used to check the font family name and the font face/style declared by a font file.? Using the gnome-font-viewer command for example you'll see the infofont fonts declare the "Tiresias Infofont" and "Tiresias Infofont Z" (so you have two different families in this archive) for the first font set, you would get tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts ? tiresias-tiresias-infofont-fonts That should obviously normalise to tiresias-infofont-fonts, except I need to rework the wording a bit > Since the naming guidelines say "When foundryname, projectname or > fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, it should be skipped to avoid > foofont-fonts packages." This should say "the affix should be skipped" instead of "it should be skipped" I didn't thought one could read it like you did tiresias-infofont-fonts ? tiresias-info-fonts So the guidelines more or less work, and produce about the same naming as you proposed, except I need to rework some little points to avoid misinterpretations I've updated the guideline proposal with some clarifications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 19:06:47 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel .cvsignore, 1.20, 1.21 freetype.spec, 1.66, 1.67 sources, 1.20, 1.21 Message-ID: <20090115190647.CFF437012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28447 Modified Files: .cvsignore freetype.spec sources Log Message: * Thu Jan 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.8-1 - Update to 2.3.8 - Remove freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21 --- .cvsignore 14 Aug 2008 15:41:06 -0000 1.20 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000 1.21 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2 -freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2 -ft2demos-2.3.7.tar.bz2 +freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2 Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.66 retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -r1.66 -r1.67 --- freetype.spec 9 Dec 2008 21:04:45 -0000 1.66 +++ freetype.spec 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000 1.67 @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype -Version: 2.3.7 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 2.3.8 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -33,9 +33,6 @@ # Fix crash https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6841 Patch89: freetype-2.2.1-memcpy-fix.patch -# Upstream patches -Patch101: freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch - Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: libX11-devel @@ -96,8 +93,6 @@ %patch88 -p1 -b .multilib %patch89 -p1 -b .memcpy -%patch101 -p0 -b .autohinter-ligature - %build %configure --disable-static @@ -224,6 +219,10 @@ %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.8-1 +- Update to 2.3.8 +- Remove freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch + * Tue Dec 09 2008 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.7-3 - Add full source URL to Source lines. - Add docs to main and devel package. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.20 retrieving revision 1.21 diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21 --- sources 14 Aug 2008 15:41:06 -0000 1.20 +++ sources 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000 1.21 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -83306194817ebdea554133b4232a34aa freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2 -2ba135e6a126ed86e9b462167511ced8 freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2 -cf2cc0d0d4788548556c360c25fbe011 ft2demos-2.3.7.tar.bz2 +6cf31a08826715a0d16ae366da9c7d3b freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +de1cc7cf098e11fba5898efdab1bc23d freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +6582649a8b877ec8d9893a9d834f7ab6 ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2 From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Thu Jan 15 19:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090115191102.1AE8123F503@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |behdad at gnome.org ------- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-15 19:11 UTC ------- Roozbeh: they need to patent it for your claim to make any sense. That's the mistake Apple made... using copyright to claim ownership on ideas. Of course, Microsoft just took them and the judge agreed that they don't owe Apple anything. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 19:14:45 2009 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel silkscreen-fonts-expanded-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 silkscreen-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 silkscreen-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090115191445.A68F57012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30655 Modified Files: silkscreen-fonts.spec Added Files: silkscreen-fonts-expanded-fontconfig.conf silkscreen-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: compliance with new font packaging guidelines --- NEW FILE silkscreen-fonts-expanded-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Silkscreen Expanded Silkscreen Expanded sans-serif --- NEW FILE silkscreen-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Silkscreen Silkscreen sans-serif Index: silkscreen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/silkscreen-fonts/devel/silkscreen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- silkscreen-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2008 17:37:42 -0000 1.1 +++ silkscreen-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 19:14:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,27 +1,56 @@ %define fontname silkscreen -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontconf 60-%{fontname} + +%define common_desc \ +Silkscreen is a four member type family for your Web graphics created by Jason \ +Kottke. Silkscreen is best used in places where extremely small graphical \ +display type is needed. The primary use is for navigational items (nav bars, \ +menus, etc), but it works well wherever small type is needed. In order to \ +preserve the proper spacing and letterforms, Silkscreen should be used at 8pt. \ +multiples (8pt., 16pt., 24pt., etc.) with anti-aliasing turned off. \ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Silkscreen four member type family Version: 1.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} # License attribution confirmed by author and Open Font Library # http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/jkottke/218 License: OFL Group: User Interface/X Source0: http://www.kottke.org/plus/type/silkscreen/download/silkscreen.tar.gz +Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf +Source2: %{name}-expanded-fontconfig.conf URL: http://www.kottke.org/plus/type/silkscreen/ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -Silkscreen is a four member type family for your Web graphics created by Jason -Kottke. Silkscreen is best used in places where extremely small graphical -display type is needed. The primary use is for navigational items (nav bars, -menus, etc), but it works well wherever small type is needed. In order to -preserve the proper spacing and letterforms, Silkscreen should be used at 8pt. -multiples (8pt., 16pt., 24pt., etc.) with anti-aliasing turned off. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for Silkscreen fonts (documentation...) +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other Silkscreen packages. + +%package -n %{fontname}-expanded-fonts +Summary: Expanded Silkscreen font family +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-expanded-fonts +%common_desc + +This font family has a slightly expanded spacing between the letters in +comparison to the normal Silkscreen font family. + +%_font_pkg -n expanded -f %{fontconf}-expanded.conf slkscre*.ttf %prep %setup -q -c -n %{name} @@ -29,31 +58,30 @@ %build %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +rm -rf %{buildroot} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-expanded.conf + +for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-expanded.conf ; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf +done %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf slkscr.ttf slkscrb.ttf -%files +%files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc readme.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.ttf +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-2 +- rework package for new font guidelines + * Tue Dec 11 2007 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-1 - Initial package for Fedora From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151918.n0FJINav028893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477457, which changed state. Bug 477457 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 19:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477457] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151918.n0FJIMkQ028867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-15 14:18:21 EDT --- This packages has been updated in rawhide. It now generates: silkscreen-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm silkscreen-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm silkscreen-fonts-common-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm (there are two font families: Silkscreen and Silkscreen Expanded) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Thu Jan 15 20:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090115200037.EADA123EF65@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luis.villa at gmail.com ------- Comment #6 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-15 20:00 UTC ------- Behdad, IANAL, but this is not an idea. The "idea" part of this is presenting characters in a chart, which everyone is entitled to. But copyright protects the presentation part of what Unicode has done. Random quote from Wikipedia: "Copyright does not cover ideas and information themselves, only the form or manner in which they are expressed." So, if we want to print Unicode character charts with 16 rows and a hex digit on each row and the rest of the character code at top of each column, write the character code under each glyph, and gray-out the area for not-yet-encoded characters, that may be illegal copying. What I suggest is, if we really want to print character charts (as opposed to what Nicolas suggested in bug 561908), we should redesign it. Otherwise, our work could be considered unlicensed derivative work. Still, since GNOME is a member of Unicode, we probably don't want to get on their nerves. We can ask them officially, if you do not object. CC-ing Luis, asking for insight and advice. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901152026.n0FKQoFq032604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-15 15:26:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From spot at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 20:37:15 2009 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-pc-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-pc-z-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-sign-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-sign-z-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090115203715.F101B7012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11081 Modified Files: tiresias-fonts.spec Added Files: tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-pc-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-pc-z-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-sign-fontconfig.conf tiresias-fonts-sign-z-fontconfig.conf Log Message: convert package to new guidelines --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Infofont Infofont sans-serif Infofont Z Infofont --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Infofont Z Infofont Z sans-serif Infofont Infofont Z --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Keyfont V2 Keyfont V2 sans-serif --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.conf --- serif LPfont LPfont serif --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-pc-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif PCfont PCfont sans-serif PCfont Z PCfont --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-pc-z-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif PCfont Z PCfont Z sans-serif PCfont PCfont Z --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-sign-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Signfont Signfont sans-serif Signfont Z Signfont --- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-sign-z-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Signfont Z Signfont Z sans-serif Signfont Signfont Z Index: tiresias-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- tiresias-fonts.spec 7 Jan 2008 22:39:39 -0000 1.1 +++ tiresias-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 20:36:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,11 +1,17 @@ %define fontname tiresias -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf + +%define common_desc \ +The Tiresias family of fonts has been designed for use in multiple environments \ +to help improve legibility, especially for individuals with visual impairment. \ +It includes specialized fonts for information labels, control labels (for key \ +tops), large print publications, computer systems, television subtitling, and \ +signs. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Low vision fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} License: GPLv3+ Group: User Interface/X Source0: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/infofont.zip @@ -13,16 +19,148 @@ Source2: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/lpfont.zip Source3: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/pcfont.zip Source4: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/signfont.zip +Source5: %{name}-info-fontconfig.conf +Source6: %{name}-info-z-fontconfig.conf +Source7: %{name}-key-v2-fontconfig.conf +Source8: %{name}-lp-fontconfig.conf +Source9: %{name}-pc-fontconfig.conf +Source10: %{name}-pc-z-fontconfig.conf +Source11: %{name}-sign-fontconfig.conf +Source12: %{name}-sign-z-fontconfig.conf URL: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildArch: noarch %description -The Tiresias family of fonts has been designed for use in multiple environments -to help improve legibility, especially for individuals with visual impairment. -It includes specialized fonts for information labels, control labels (for key -tops), large print publications, computer systems, television subtitling, and -signs. +%common_desc + +%package common +Summary: Common files for Tiresias fonts (documentation...) +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other Tiresias packages. + +%package -n %{fontname}-info-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for info terminals for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-info-fonts +%common_desc + +The Infofont family is specialized for use in informational labels on public +terminals such as ATMs using large characters. The only difference between the +Infofont and the Infofont Z families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. +In the Infofont family, the zero is _not_ crossed out, which may lead to some +confusion. + +%_font_pkg -n info -f %{fontconf}-infofont.conf "Tiresias*Infofont*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-info-z-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for info terminals for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-info-z-fonts +%common_desc + +The Infofont Z family is specialized for use in informational labels on public +terminals such as ATMs using large characters. The only difference between the +Infofont Z and the Infofont families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. +In the Infofont Z family, the zero is crossed out. + +%_font_pkg -n info-z -f %{fontconf}-infofont-z.conf "TIRESIAS*INFOFONTZ*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-key-v2-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for labeling keycaps for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-key-v2-fonts +%common_desc + +The Keyfont V2 family is specialized for use in labeling keycaps. + +%_font_pkg -n key-v2 -f %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf "TIREKV__.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-lp-fonts +Summary: Specialized font for large print publications +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-lp-fonts +%common_desc + +The LPfont family is specialized for use in large print publications. + +%_font_pkg -n lp -f %{fontconf}-lpfont.conf "Tiresias*LPfont*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-pc-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for use on PCs for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-pc-fonts +%common_desc + +The PCfont family is specialized for people with poor vision to use on PC +screens using large characters. The only difference between the PCfont and +the PCfont Z families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. In the +PCfont family, the zero is _not_ crossed out, which may lead to some +confusion. + +%_font_pkg -n pc -f %{fontconf}-pcfont.conf "Tiresias*PCfont*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-pc-z-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for use on PCs for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-pc-z-fonts +%common_desc + +The PCfont family is specialized for people with poor vision to use on PC +screens using large characters. The only difference between the PCfont and +the PCfont Z families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. In the +PCfont Z family, the zero is crossed out. + +%_font_pkg -n pc-z -f %{fontconf}-pcfont-z.conf "TIRESIAS*PCFONTZ*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-sign-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for preparing signs for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-sign-fonts +%common_desc + +The Signfont family is specialized for preparing signs for the visually +impaired, using large characters. The only difference between the Signfont and +the Signfont Z families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. In the +Signfont family, the zero is _not_ crossed out, which may lead to some +confusion. + +%_font_pkg -n sign -f %{fontconf}-signfont.conf "Tiresias*Signfont*.ttf" + +%package -n %{fontname}-sign-z-fonts +Summary: Specialized fonts for preparing signs for the visually impaired +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-sign-z-fonts +%common_desc + +The Signfont family is specialized for preparing signs for the visually +impaired, using large characters. The only difference between the Signfont and +the Signfont Z families is whether the zero is crossed out or not. In the +Signfont Z family, the zero is crossed out. + +%_font_pkg -n sign-z -f %{fontconf}-signfont-z.conf "TIRESIAS*SIGNFONTZ*.ttf" %prep %setup -q -c -n %{name} @@ -40,32 +178,36 @@ %build %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +rm -rf %{buildroot} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-infofont.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-infofont-z.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-lpfont.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pcfont.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-pcfont-z.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-signfont.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-signfont-z.conf + +for fontconf in %{fontconf}-infofont.conf %{fontconf}-infofont-z.conf %{fontconf}-keyfont-v2.conf %{fontconf}-lpfont.conf\ + %{fontconf}-pcfont.conf %{fontconf}-pcfont-z.conf %{fontconf}-signfont.conf %{fontconf}-signfont-z.conf; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf +done %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : - fi -fi +rm -rf %{buildroot} -%files +%files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc COPYING/copying.doc COPYING/gpl.txt -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.ttf +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-3 +- rework to meet new font packaging guidelines + * Wed Jan 2 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway 1.0-2 - font versions didn't change, but sha1sums did From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901152039.n0FKd5j4017850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477468, which changed state. Bug 477468 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 20:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901152039.n0FKd4eX017825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-15 15:39:03 EDT --- Okay, I migrated this one over. It now writes out: tiresias-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm tiresias-fonts-common-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm The font families are: Infofont, Infofont Z, Keyfont V2, LPfont, PCfont, PCfont Z, Signfont, Signfont Z -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 22:21:18 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 fontpackages.spec, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090115222118.8A2C57012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30804/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.15 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 +++ .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 +++ fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.14 +Version: 1.15 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -97,8 +97,12 @@ %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.15-1 +??? lua-ize the main macro + * Wed Jan 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot -- 1.13-1 +- 1.14-1 ??? Update for subpackage naming changes requested by FPC * Mon Dec 22 2008 Nicolas Mailhot Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- import.log 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 +++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ fontpackages-1_12-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-2.fc11.src.rpm:1229863050 fontpackages-1_13-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229949018 fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787 +fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 -0000 1.5 +++ sources 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -a90a6bbc2937c847fb32cad0bac41726 fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2 +69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 22:55:10 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.92, 1.93 import.log, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090115225510.430407012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3088/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: update for new naming guidelines Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.92 retrieving revision 1.93 diff -u -r1.92 -r1.93 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 -0000 1.92 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:54:37 -0000 1.93 @@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.28 -Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain -URL: http://%{fontname}.sf.net/ +URL: http://%{name}.org/ Source0: %{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData} BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 %description %common_desc @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 -Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono +Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Requires: %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts +Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts %description compat %compat_desc @@ -69,14 +71,16 @@ Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 -Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono +Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts +Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts +Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts %description lgc-compat %compat_desc %package common -Summary: Common files for Dejavu fonts (documentation???) +Summary: Common files for the Dejavu font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -88,7 +92,7 @@ This package consists of files used by other DejaVu packages. -%package sans +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -96,7 +100,10 @@ Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 -%description sans +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < 2.28-2 +Provides: %{name}-sans = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, in @@ -105,7 +112,7 @@ %_font_pkg -n sans -f *-%{fontname}-sans.conf DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuSans-*.ttf DejaVuSansCondensed*.ttf -%package serif +%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: Variable-width serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -113,7 +120,10 @@ Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 -%description serif +Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < 2.28-2 +Provides: %{name}-serif = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, in their @@ -122,7 +132,7 @@ %_font_pkg -n serif -f *-%{fontname}-serif.conf DejaVuSerif.ttf DejaVuSerif-*.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed*.ttf -%package sans-mono +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -130,7 +140,10 @@ Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3 Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3 -%description sans-mono +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono < 2.28-2 +Provides: %{name}-sans-mono = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, in their @@ -139,14 +152,16 @@ %_font_pkg -n sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DejaVuSansMono*.ttf -%package lgc-sans +%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 -%description lgc-sans +Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-sans < 2.28-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, with @@ -155,14 +170,16 @@ %_font_pkg -n lgc-sans -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans.conf DejaVuLGCSans.ttf DejaVuLGCSans-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed*.ttf -%package lgc-serif +%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts Summary: Variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 -%description lgc-serif +Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-sans < 2.28-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, with @@ -171,14 +188,16 @@ %_font_pkg -n lgc-serif -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-serif.conf DejaVuLGCSerif.ttf DejaVuLGCSerif-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSerifCondensed*.ttf -%package lgc-sans-mono +%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 -%description lgc-sans-mono +Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-sans-mono < 2.28-2 + +%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, with @@ -237,6 +256,12 @@ %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.28-2 +??? Update URL +??? update for new naming guidelines +??? warning: provides for the old names will be dropped before F11 beta + * Sun Dec 21 2008 - 2.28-1 ??? Update to latest release Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- import.log 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 -0000 1.9 +++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 22:54:38 -0000 1.10 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_26-6_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.26-6.fc11.src.rpm:1226221359 dejavu-fonts-2_27-7_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.27-7.fc11.src.rpm:1229544635 dejavu-fonts-2_28-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229879833 +dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901152316.n0FNGIqV015639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #18 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-15 18:16:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329150) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329150) difference between F10 and F11 requirements of fontforge There is something weird going on with F-10's fontforge. Maybe it wasn't built all right or something. Running "rpm -q -R" on it doesn't even list libuninameslist! Attaching a file showing dependency differences between the output of rpm -q -R between what I built on my machine using devel branch of CVS and the latest F-10 rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 15 23:44:02 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090115234402.A32447012D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9217/devel Modified Files: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: build with fontpackages 1.15 Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 00:28:12 -0000 1.11 +++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 -0000 1.12 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.10 -Release: 13%{?dist} +Release: 14%{?dist} Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.10-14 +??? update for new naming guidelines +??? build with new fontpackages (1.15) + * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 1.10-12 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 15 Jan 2009 00:28:12 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 23:43:32 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-12.fc11.src.rpm:1229541266 bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242 +bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-14_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-14.fc11.src.rpm:1232062969 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160006.n0G06QM3009944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-15 19:06:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > please take a look for web sshot I committed > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which > > Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the > same black as other strokes. Could you kindly screenshot the R in non-Pango application? (such as gedit) > I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. Would you mind re-confirm in 'gnome-appearance-properties' which anti-aliasing is *off* please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Fri Jan 16 00:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090116005843.5BDF523F503@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x ------- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-16 00:58 UTC ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Behdad, IANAL, but this is not an idea. The "idea" part of this is presenting > characters in a chart, which everyone is entitled to. That's what I'm saying indeed. > But copyright protects the presentation part of what Unicode has done. Random > quote from Wikipedia: "Copyright does not cover ideas and information > themselves, only the form or manner in which they are expressed." The expression of the idea is the code generating it or the generated output. Since we are not literally copying any of those, we're good. > So, if we want to print Unicode character charts with 16 rows and a hex digit > on each row and the rest of the character code at top of each column, write the > character code under each glyph, and gray-out the area for not-yet-encoded > characters, that may be illegal copying. No that's not. We are not using source code or generated output from the consortium. Really, copyright is for something you have created, patent is for ideas. A certain layout is an idea. A piece of source code or a generated output is copyrightable. The idea of generated such a thing is at best patentable. See: http://lowendmac.com/orchard/06/apple-vs-microsoft.html To quote: "...and most of the other ten were not violations of Apple's copyright due to the merger doctrine (the merger doctrine stipulates that ideas cannot be copyrighted). In the case of Apple vs. Microsoft, many of the displays Apple contested were ideas and could not be protected by copyright." What you say is like saying that "application windows are copyright by company X, so doing them in GNOME is making derivative work". Think about wine or any other "free reimplementation" project. Those would have been totally illegal if your reasoning was to be followed. > What I suggest is, if we really want to print character charts (as opposed to > what Nicolas suggested in bug 561908), we should redesign it. Otherwise, our > work could be considered unlicensed derivative work. To produce derivative work, one needs to use an original to begin with. > Still, since GNOME is a member of Unicode, we probably don't want to get on > their nerves. We can ask them officially, if you do not object. I' sure we can work something out. I'm more talking theoretically. > CC-ing Luis, asking for insight and advice. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Fri Jan 16 00:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 162370] Print the table! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090116005926.C1D8223EF5E@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x ------- Comment #8 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-16 00:59 UTC ------- For the record, IANAL. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 02:43:25 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf, NONE, 1.1 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20090116024325.425D270127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29418 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Added Files: 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-11.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Include macro _font_pkg and created fontconfig .conf files.) --- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf --- Baekmuk Batang serif serif Baekmuk Batang --- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf --- Baekmuk Dotum sans-serif sans-serif Baekmuk Dotum --- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf --- Baekmuk Gulim monospace monospace Baekmuk Gulim --- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf --- Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 00:05:40 -0000 1.6 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,24 +1,27 @@ %define fontname baekmuk-ttf -%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} -%define archivename %{name}-%{version} +%define archivename %{fontname}-%{version} %define common_desc \ This package provides the free Korean TrueType fonts. -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} +%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X License: Baekmuk URL: http://kldp.net/projects/baekmuk/ -Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/%{archivename}.tar.gz Source1: FAPIcidfmap.ko Source2: cidfmap.ko +Source3: 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf +Source4: 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf +Source5: 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf +Source6: 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf Obsoletes: fonts-korean @@ -41,80 +44,133 @@ This package contains some common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. -%define mk_pkg()\ -%package %1\ -Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType %2 typeface\ -License: Baekmuk\ -Group: User Interface/X\ -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6\ -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common\ -\ -%description %1\ -%common_desc\ -\ -This package contains the Korean TrueType font %2 typeface.\ -\ -%post %1\ -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then\ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts\ -fi\ -\ -%postun %1\ -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then\ - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then\ - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts\ - fi\ -fi\ -\ -%files %1\ -%defattr(-,root,root,-)\ -%dir %{fontdir}-%1\ -%{fontdir}-%1/*.ttf\ -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}-%1/fonts.dir\ -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}-%1/fonts.scale\ -%{catalogue}/%{name}-%1 - -%mk_pkg batang Batang -%mk_pkg dotum Dotum -%mk_pkg gulim Gulim -%mk_pkg hline Headline +%package batang +Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Batang typeface +License: Baekmuk +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common + +%description batang +%common_desc + +This package contains the Korean TrueType font Batang typeface. + +%_font_pkg -n batang -f *-%{fontname}-batang*.conf batang.ttf + +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} + +%package dotum +Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Dotum typeface +License: Baekmuk +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common + +%description dotum +%common_desc + +This package contains the Korean TrueType font Dotum typeface. + +%_font_pkg -n dotum -f *-%{fontname}-dotum*.conf dotum.ttf + +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} + +%package gulim +Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Gulim typeface +License: Baekmuk +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common + +%description gulim +%common_desc + +This package contains the Korean TrueType font Gulim typeface. + +%_font_pkg -n gulim -f *-%{fontname}-gulim*.conf gulim.ttf + +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} + +%package hline +Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Headline typeface +License: Baekmuk +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common + +%description hline +%common_desc + +This package contains the Korean TrueType font Headline typeface. + +%_font_pkg -n hline -f *-%{fontname}-hline*.conf hline.ttf + +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} %prep -%setup -q -n %{fontname}-%{version} +%setup -q -n %{archivename} %build %{nil} %install -rm -rf %{buildroot} - -# for catalogue -install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +%__rm -rf %{buildroot} +# font +%__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} for i in batang dotum gulim hline; do - install -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i - install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i - ln -sf ../../..%{fontdir}-$i %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name}-$i - %{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i/fonts.scale - mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir}-$i + %__install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +done + +# fontconfig conf +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +cd ../ +for fconf in `ls *-%{fontname}-*.conf` +do + %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ + %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done +cd - -# for ghostscript -install -d %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir} -install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ -install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{cidmapdir}/ +# fonts.{scale,dir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + +# ghostscript +%__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{gsdir} +%__install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ +%__install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ + +# catalogue +%__install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +%__ln_s %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{fontname} # convert Korean copyright file to utf8 -iconv -f EUC-KR -t UTF-8 COPYRIGHT.ks > COPYRIGHT.ko +%{_bindir}/iconv -f EUC-KR -t UTF-8 COPYRIGHT.ks > COPYRIGHT.ko %clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} +%__rm -rf %{buildroot} %files common %doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README -%{cidmapdir}/ +%{gsdir}/ %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-11.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Include macro _font_pkg and created fontconfig .conf files.) + * Fri Jan 09 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-10.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Convert to new font packaging guidelines.) From cchance at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 04:19:12 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.7,1.8 Message-ID: <20090116041912.C4FBD70127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7496 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-12.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Repatched buildsys error.) Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 -0000 1.7 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 04:18:42 -0000 1.8 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 12%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} cd ../ -for fconf in `ls *-%{fontname}-*.conf` +for fconf in %{SOURCE3} %{SOURCE4} %{SOURCE5} %{SOURCE6} do %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf + %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/`basename $fconf` \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/`basename $fconf` done cd - @@ -168,11 +168,14 @@ %{gsdir}/ %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-12.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Repatched buildsys error.) + * Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-11.fc11 -- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Include macro _font_pkg and created fontconfig .conf files.) +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Included macro _font_pkg and created fontconfig .conf files.) * Fri Jan 09 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-10.fc11 -- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Convert to new font packaging guidelines.) +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) * Mon Jun 30 2008 Caius Chance - 2.2-9.fc10 - Refine obsoletes tag version-release specific. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160519.n0G5JKKZ011121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-16 00:19:19 EDT --- Yeah, the one in rawhide was built with pango/cairo/spiro support. That support was not available (Or didn't work) when the f10 fontforge was built, so that explains a lot of them. Not sure why libuninameslist isn't in there. :( thats odd. Can you see any ill effect from it? That might be one more reason to try and update f10's fontforge... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 05:45:26 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.30, 1.31 fontconfig.spec, 1.109, 1.110 sources, 1.31, 1.32 Message-ID: <20090116054526.9E3D370127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18376 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.30 retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31 --- .cvsignore 1 Jun 2008 03:48:56 -0000 1.30 +++ .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.31 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.0.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.90.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.109 retrieving revision 1.110 diff -u -r1.109 -r1.110 --- fontconfig.spec 20 Oct 2008 22:58:41 -0000 1.109 +++ fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.110 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.0 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.90 +Release: 1.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -132,6 +132,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a +- Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a + * Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-3 - Add fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch - Resolves: #464470 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.31 retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32 --- sources 1 Jun 2008 03:48:56 -0000 1.31 +++ sources 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.32 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ab54ec1d4ddd836313fdbc0cd5299d6d fontconfig-2.6.0.tar.gz +c907dd0ebec0e95ddae1f5f65b1ada4e fontconfig-2.6.90.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 05:46:51 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.110,1.111 Message-ID: <20090116054651.4528570127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18569 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.110 retrieving revision 1.111 diff -u -r1.110 -r1.111 --- fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.110 +++ fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:46:20 -0000 1.111 @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog -* Fri Jan 16 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a * Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-3 From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 05:53:51 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec, 1.111, 1.112 fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090116055351.7431570127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19537 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Removed Files: fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-2.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Remove upstreamed patch Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.111 retrieving revision 1.112 diff -u -r1.111 -r1.112 --- fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:46:20 -0000 1.111 +++ fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:53:21 -0000 1.112 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.90 -Release: 1.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} +Release: 2.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -23,8 +23,6 @@ # reference the new path in %%configure Conflicts: fonts-xorg-base, fonts-xorg-syriac -Patch0: fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch - %description Fontconfig is designed to locate fonts within the system and select them according to requirements specified by @@ -46,7 +44,6 @@ %prep %setup -q -%patch0 -p0 -b .indic %build @@ -132,8 +129,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog -* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-2.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a +- Remove upstreamed patch * Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.0-3 - Add fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch --- fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch DELETED --- From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 05:58:41 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.112,1.113 Message-ID: <20090116055841.213C870142@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20144 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: * Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.90-3.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Install fc-scan and fc-query Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.112 retrieving revision 1.113 diff -u -r1.112 -r1.113 --- fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:53:21 -0000 1.112 +++ fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:58:10 -0000 1.113 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.90 -Release: 2.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} +Release: 3.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -105,9 +105,11 @@ %doc fontconfig-user.txt fontconfig-user.html %{_libdir}/libfontconfig.so.* %{_bindir}/fc-cache +%{_bindir}/fc-cat %{_bindir}/fc-list %{_bindir}/fc-match -%{_bindir}/fc-cat +%{_bindir}/fc-query +%{_bindir}/fc-scan %dir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.avail %dir %{_datadir}/fonts %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/fonts.dtd @@ -129,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-3.git.63.g6bb4b9a +- Install fc-scan and fc-query + * Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-2.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Remove upstreamed patch From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 07:45:03 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090116074503.304BD1F8261@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 07:45:03 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090116074503.69B221F825C@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161208.n0GC84Bo019896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #10 from san 2009-01-16 07:08:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329197) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329197) antialias use Subpixel option in Ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161206.n0GC6bi7019711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 san changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #9 from san 2009-01-16 07:06:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329196) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329196) antialias use Grayscale option in Ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161212.n0GCC0x5006147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #11 from san 2009-01-16 07:11:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > please take a look for web sshot I committed > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which > > > > Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the > > same black as other strokes. > > Could you kindly screenshot the R in non-Pango application? (such as gedit) > > > > I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. > > Would you mind re-confirm in 'gnome-appearance-properties' which anti-aliasing > is *off* please? refer to comment 9 and 10. it seems antialias with subpixel enabled cannot get blurriness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161641.n0GGfT4D004588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477480, which changed state. Bug 477480 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477480] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161641.n0GGfSKh004564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480 Karel Voln? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Karel Voln? 2009-01-16 11:41:27 EDT --- fixed by removing the bundled font and rather depending on the packaged version (as it was just a copy of DejaVu Sans Mono) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 18:52:20 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-10 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 fontpackages.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090116185220.458E370142@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19640/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: Import 1.15 to use FPC and FESCO approved package naming by default Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 15 Dec 2008 22:20:35 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.11.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- fontpackages.spec 15 Dec 2008 22:20:35 -0000 1.1 +++ fontpackages.spec 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ %define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ +%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.11 +Version: 1.15 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -10,8 +11,7 @@ # Mostly means the scriptlets inserted via this package do not change the # license of the packages they're inserted in License: LGPLv3+ -# Or git://git.fedorahosted.org/fontpackages.git -URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_SIG +URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -53,22 +53,27 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} # Pull macros out of macros.fonts and emulate them during install -for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do +for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_masterdir \ + fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \ macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) done install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \ + %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_masterdir} \ %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_confdir} \ %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} \ - %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} -install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} -install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} + %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates +install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} +install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} +install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir ${_fontbasedir} +%dir ${_fontconfig_masterdir} %dir ${_fontconfig_confdir} %dir ${_fontconfig_templatedir} EOF @@ -78,26 +83,52 @@ %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc license.txt readme.txt fontconfig-templates/ +%doc license.txt readme.txt %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros* +%dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/* %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.15-1 +??? lua-ize the main macro + +* Wed Jan 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.14-1 +??? Update for subpackage naming changes requested by FPC + +* Mon Dec 22 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.13-1 +??? Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff +??? use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place + +* Sun Dec 21 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.12-2 +??? Change homepage + +* Fri Dec 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.12-1 +??? Add another macro to allow building fontconfig without cycling + * Wed Dec 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.11-1 ??? Add actual fedorahosted references + * Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.10-1 ??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? + * Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.9-1 ??? fix and complete fontconfig doc -* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.8-1 ??? simplify multi spec template: codify general case - 1.7-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 15 Dec 2008 22:20:35 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229379612 +fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-10:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131877 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 15 Dec 2008 22:20:35 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 16 Jan 2009 18:51:49 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -362046a39434fe95ea9c9ab4ea4880ba fontpackages-1.11.tar.bz2 +69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 18:53:05 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/F-9 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 fontpackages.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090116185305.4B87E70141@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19834/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: Import 1.15 to use FPC and FESCO approved package naming by default Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 15 Dec 2008 22:33:49 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.11.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- fontpackages.spec 15 Dec 2008 22:33:49 -0000 1.1 +++ fontpackages.spec 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ %define spectemplatedir %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools/ +%define ftcgtemplatedir %{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates/ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.11 +Version: 1.15 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -10,8 +11,7 @@ # Mostly means the scriptlets inserted via this package do not change the # license of the packages they're inserted in License: LGPLv3+ -# Or git://git.fedorahosted.org/fontpackages.git -URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_SIG +URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -53,22 +53,27 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot} # Pull macros out of macros.fonts and emulate them during install -for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do +for dir in fontbasedir fontconfig_masterdir \ + fontconfig_confdir fontconfig_templatedir ; do export _${dir}=$(rpm --eval $(%{__grep} -E "^%_${dir}\b" \ macros/macros.fonts | %{__awk} '{ print $2 }')) done install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}${_fontbasedir} \ + %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_masterdir} \ %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_confdir} \ %{buildroot}${_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} \ - %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} -install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} -install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} + %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fontconfig/templates +install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} +install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} +install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir ${_fontbasedir} +%dir ${_fontconfig_masterdir} %dir ${_fontconfig_confdir} %dir ${_fontconfig_templatedir} EOF @@ -78,26 +83,52 @@ %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc license.txt readme.txt fontconfig-templates/ +%doc license.txt readme.txt %config(noreplace) %{spectemplatedir}/*.spec %config(noreplace) %{rpmmacrodir}/macros* +%dir %{ftcgtemplatedir} +%{ftcgtemplatedir}/* %changelog +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.15-1 +??? lua-ize the main macro + +* Wed Jan 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.14-1 +??? Update for subpackage naming changes requested by FPC + +* Mon Dec 22 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.13-1 +??? Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff +??? use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place + +* Sun Dec 21 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.12-2 +??? Change homepage + +* Fri Dec 19 2008 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.12-1 +??? Add another macro to allow building fontconfig without cycling + * Wed Dec 10 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.11-1 ??? Add actual fedorahosted references + * Sun Nov 23 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.10-1 ??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? + * Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.9-1 ??? fix and complete fontconfig doc -* Fri Nov 14 2008 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.8-1 ??? simplify multi spec template: codify general case - 1.7-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 15 Dec 2008 22:33:49 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ fontpackages-1_11-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229380405 +fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:F-9:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232131899 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 15 Dec 2008 22:33:49 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 16 Jan 2009 18:52:34 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -362046a39434fe95ea9c9ab4ea4880ba fontpackages-1.11.tar.bz2 +69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 20:41:52 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:41:52 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090116204152.D36BB208203@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by nim To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 21:14:13 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 import.log, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090116211413.D029870127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3100/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: update for new naming guidelines Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 20:00:39 -0000 1.3 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 21:13:43 -0000 1.4 @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 -Release: 5%{?dist} -Summary: ??colier court cursive fonts +Release: 6%{?dist} +Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ %package common -Summary: ??colier court, common files (documentation???) +Summary: Common files of the ??colier Court font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem @@ -47,16 +47,16 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package lignes -Summary: ??colier lignes court fantasy font +%package -n %{fontname}-lignes-fonts +Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts with lines Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description lignes +%description -n %{fontname}-lignes-fonts %common_desc -The ?? lignes ?? (lines) font variant includes the Seyes lining commonly used by -schoolchildren notepads. +The ?? lignes ?? (lines) ??colier court font variant includes the Seyes lining +commonly used by schoolchildren notepads. %_font_pkg -n lignes -f %{fontconf}.conf ec_cour.ttf @@ -91,10 +91,10 @@ install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE5} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-lignes.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ - %{fontconf}-lignes.conf ; do - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf +for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ + %{fontconf}-lignes.conf ; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean @@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2009 +- 20070702-6 +??? Convert to new naming guidelines + * Wed Dec 17 2008 - 20070702-5 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpm unicode bug to fix koji build Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 20:00:39 -0000 1.3 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 21:13:43 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-1_fc10:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-1.fc10.src.rpm:1216485467 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-4_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-4.fc11.src.rpm:1229541673 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5.fc11.src.rpm:1229543899 +ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232140382 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 21:28:02 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/stix-fonts/devel import.log,1.2,1.3 stix-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090116212802.D246D70142@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5947/devel Modified Files: import.log stix-fonts.spec Log Message: update for new naming guidelines Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:58:52 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ stix-fonts-0_9-7_fc10:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-7.fc10.src.rpm:1215809789 stix-fonts-0_9-9_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-9.fc11.src.rpm:1229543904 +stix-fonts-0_9-10_fc11:HEAD:stix-fonts-0.9-10.fc11.src.rpm:1232141192 Index: stix-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/stix-fonts/devel/stix-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- stix-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:58:52 -0000 1.5 +++ stix-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 21:27:32 -0000 1.6 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9 -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ use. -%package pua +%package -n %{fontname}-pua-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, PUA glyphs Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -%description pua +Obsoletes: %{name}-pua < 0.9-10 + +%description -n %{fontname}-pua-fonts %common_desc This package includes fonts containing glyphs called out from the Unicode @@ -54,12 +56,14 @@ %_font_pkg -n pua -f %{fontconf}-pua.conf STIXNonUni*otf -%package integrals +%package -n %{fontname}-integrals-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional integral glyphs Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -%description integrals +Obsoletes: %{name}-integrals < 0.9-10 + +%description -n %{fontname}-integrals-fonts %common_desc This package includes fonts containing additional integrals of various size @@ -68,12 +72,14 @@ %_font_pkg -n integrals -f %{fontconf}-integrals.conf STIXInt*.otf -%package sizes +%package -n %{fontname}-sizes-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph sizes Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -%description sizes +Obsoletes: %{name}-sizes < 0.9-10 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sizes-fonts %common_desc This package includes fonts containing glyphs in additional sizes (Mostly @@ -82,12 +88,14 @@ %_font_pkg -n sizes -f %{fontconf}-sizes.conf STIXSiz*.otf -%package variants +%package -n %{fontname}-variants-fonts Summary: STIX scientific and engineering fonts, additional glyph variants Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -%description variants +Obsoletes: %{name}-variants < 0.9-10 + +%description -n %{fontname}-variants-fonts %common_desc This package includes fonts containing alternative variants of some glyphs. @@ -129,13 +137,13 @@ install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE6} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-variants.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ - %{fontconf}-pua.conf \ - %{fontconf}-integrals.conf \ - %{fontconf}-sizes.conf \ - %{fontconf}-variants.conf ; do - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf +for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ + %{fontconf}-pua.conf \ + %{fontconf}-integrals.conf \ + %{fontconf}-sizes.conf \ + %{fontconf}-variants.conf ; do + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done @@ -150,6 +158,10 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jan 16 2009 +- 0.9-10 +??? Convert to new naming guidelines + * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 0.9-9 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 22:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162209.n0GM9Xre022994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-16 17:09:32 EDT --- Will let it steam in rawhide a bit before importing in stable releases as it includes CJK fonts and we always seem to get them wrong at first somehow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 22:11:10 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel NOTICE, NONE, 1.1 README.txt, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090116221110.721F170127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12735/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: NOTICE README.txt google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE NOTICE --- Copyright (c) 2005-2008, The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION 1. Definitions. "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License. "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License. "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files. "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types. "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work (an example is provided in the Appendix below). "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof. "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and subsequently incorporated within the Work. 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License. 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions. 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor has been advised of the possibility of such damages. 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS --- NEW FILE README.txt --- Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. ########## This directory contains the fonts for the platform. They are licensed under the Apache 2 license. --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Droid Sans Droid Sans sans-serif Droid Sans Fallback Droid Sans --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Droid Sans Mono Droid Sans Mono monospace --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf --- serif Droid Serif Droid Serif serif --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts.spec --- %define fontname google-droid %define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts %define common_desc \ The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender???s \ Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \ for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \ on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for \ other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X License: ASL 2.0 URL: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts Source1: %{download_root}/DroidSans.ttf Source2: %{download_root}/DroidSans-Bold.ttf Source3: %{download_root}/DroidSansFallback.ttf Source4: %{download_root}/DroidSansMono.ttf Source5: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Source6: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Bold.ttf Source7: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Italic.ttf Source8: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf Source9: %{download_root}/NOTICE Source10: %{download_root}/README.txt Source11: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source12: %{name}-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf Source13: %{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files of the Droid font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: A humanist sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans is a humanist sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans -f ??-%{fontname}-sans.conf DroidSans.ttf DroidSans-Bold.ttf DroidSansFallback.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: A humanist monospace sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans Mono is a humanist monospace sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans-mono -f ??-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DroidSansMono.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: A serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc Droid Serif is a contemporary serif typeface family designed for comfortable reading on screen. Droid Serif is slightly condensed to maximize the amount of text displayed on small screens. Vertical stress and open forms contribute to its readability while its proportion and overall design complement its companion Droid Sans. %_font_pkg -n serif -f ??-%{fontname}-serif.conf DroidSerif*ttf %prep %setup -q -c -T install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} notice.txt install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} readme.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} %{SOURCE4} %{SOURCE5} \ %{SOURCE6} %{SOURCE7} %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/65-%{fontname}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/60-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/59-%{fontname}-serif.conf for fontconf in 59-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-serif.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Fri Jan 16 2009 - 1.0.112-2 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check) * Tue Dec 9 2008 - 1.0.112-1 ?? Licensing bit clarified in bug #472635 ?? Fedora submission * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 1.0.107-1 ?? Initial built using ???fontpackages??? --- NEW FILE import.log --- google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 22:10:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +DroidSans-Bold.ttf +DroidSans.ttf +DroidSansFallback.ttf +DroidSansMono.ttf +DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 16 Jan 2009 22:10:40 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +2afdf28d5cdd079b41968cdabf1b469e DroidSans-Bold.ttf +6f28ad369fa0f2661cc2de7a7be9977e DroidSans.ttf +4caeadd734f4be9973163bdf02ea6cf5 DroidSansFallback.ttf +3922dfe38a36da7d6edfb1fe77b276fb DroidSansMono.ttf +849a92990a80cbb665bfc74fd03743bd DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +a062025df92affc1331a05b7c07793fc DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +a2e7305a0ba8bb7091124f4cd1485fc9 DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +bfb2f44a7c1deba39f7f4d39bff18eeb DroidSerif-Regular.ttf From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 22:29:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090116222951.E493E70142@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15059/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: workaround rhel5 rpm bug Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 22:10:40 -0000 1.1 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts %define common_desc \ -The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender???s \ +The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender's \ Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \ for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \ on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for \ @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ %changelog * Fri Jan 16 2009 +- 1.0.112-3 +??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug - 1.0.112-2 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check) Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 22:10:40 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809 +google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232144541 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 16 23:04:31 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.93, 1.94 import.log, 1.10, 1.11 Message-ID: <20090116230431.8E71370127@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20163/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fix lgc-serif obsoletes Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.93 retrieving revision 1.94 diff -u -r1.93 -r1.94 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:54:37 -0000 1.93 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000 1.94 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.28 -Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts < 2.26-3 -Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-sans < 2.28-2 +Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-serif < 2.28-2 %description -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -256,7 +256,11 @@ %changelog -* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +* Fri Jan 16 2009 +- 2.28-3 +??? Fix lgc-serif obsoletes + +* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.28-2 ??? Update URL ??? update for new naming guidelines Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- import.log 15 Jan 2009 22:54:38 -0000 1.10 +++ import.log 16 Jan 2009 23:04:00 -0000 1.11 @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_27-7_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.27-7.fc11.src.rpm:1229544635 dejavu-fonts-2_28-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229879833 dejavu-fonts-2_28-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232060001 +dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477055] Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162343.n0GNh8pD007452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:43:06 EDT --- rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477055] Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162344.n0GNiHsj024961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:44:16 EDT --- rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477055] Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162343.n0GNhF0d024698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rajeeshknambiar at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 05:28:48 2009 From: rajeeshknambiar at fedoraproject.org (Rajeesh K Nambiar) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090117052848.AD99A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rajeeshknambiar Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1672 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: Update for new font naming guidelines Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- smc-fonts.spec 6 Jan 2009 09:30:39 -0000 1.3 +++ smc-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 05:28:18 -0000 1.4 @@ -6,16 +6,16 @@ The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of\ traditional and new Malayalam Script. -Name: %{fontname}-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script -Group: User Interface/X +Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 -URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/smc -Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-%{version}.zip +URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/smc +Source: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-%{version}.zip BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %description @@ -23,74 +23,81 @@ %package common Summary: Common files for smc-fonts -Group: User Interface/X +Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc -%package dyuthi +%package -n %{fontname}-dyuthi-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description dyuthi +Obsoletes: %{name}-dyuthi < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-dyuthi-fonts The smc-fonts-dyuthi package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. -%package meera +%package -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ with exceptions -%description meera +Obsoletes: %{name}-meera < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts The smc-fonts-meera package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. -%package rachana +%package -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ -%description rachana +Obsoletes: %{name}-rachana < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts The smc-fonts-rachana package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. -%package raghumalayalam +%package -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2 -%description raghumalayalam +Obsoletes: %{name}-raghumalayalam < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts The smc-fonts-malayalam package contains fonts for the display of new Malayalam Scripts. -%package suruma +%package -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description suruma +Obsoletes: %{name}-suruma < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. -%package kalyani +%package -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description kalyani +Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04-1.3 +%description -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of new Malayalam Scripts. -%package anjalioldlipi +%package -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -%description anjalioldlipi +Obsoletes: %{name}-anjalioldlipi < 04.1-3 +%description -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. @@ -137,6 +144,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.1-3 +- update for new font guidelines + * Tue Jan 06 2009 Pravin Satpute 04.1-2 - bugfix 477458 - updated spec From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 05:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170552.n0H5qEEd023367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-01-17 00:52:13 EDT --- spec is updated, and Koji has built the rawhide packages successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 07:57:03 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090117075703.BDCFA1F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 07:57:05 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090117075705.B8CC51F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From nmailhot at openoffice.org Sat Jan 17 11:07:48 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jan 2009 11:07:48 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090117110748.23956.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nmailhot at openoffice.org Sat Jan 17 11:07:48 2009 From: nmailhot at openoffice.org (nmailhot at openoffice.org) Date: 17 Jan 2009 11:07:48 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090117110748.23956.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User nmailhot changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'' |'fedorafonts' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 11:42:43 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090117114243.33C877012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8651/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: add missing obsoletes Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 21:13:43 -0000 1.4 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 11:42:12 -0000 1.5 @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: %{name}-lignes < 20070702-7 + %description -n %{fontname}-lignes-fonts %common_desc @@ -109,8 +111,8 @@ %changelog -* Fri Jan 16 2009 -- 20070702-6 +* Sat Jan 17 2009 +- 20070702-7 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines * Wed Dec 17 2008 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 21:13:43 -0000 1.4 +++ import.log 17 Jan 2009 11:42:12 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-4_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-4.fc11.src.rpm:1229541673 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5.fc11.src.rpm:1229543899 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232140382 +ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232192497 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 12:03:11 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel ecolier-court-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090117120311.349277012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12432/devel Modified Files: ecolier-court-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: add missing obsoletes Index: ecolier-court-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/ecolier-court-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 11:42:12 -0000 1.5 +++ ecolier-court-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0000 1.6 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20070702 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Schoolchildren cursive fonts Group: User Interface/X Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ecolier-court-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- import.log 17 Jan 2009 11:42:12 -0000 1.5 +++ import.log 17 Jan 2009 12:02:40 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-5.fc11.src.rpm:1229543899 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232140382 ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-6.fc11.src.rpm:1232192497 +ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7_fc11:HEAD:ecolier-court-fonts-20070702-7.fc11.src.rpm:1232193736 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 12:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171225.n0HCPh9O023917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480443 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477055, which changed state. Bug 477055 Summary: Please drop fonts spec template from rpmdevtools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 12:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] New: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Alias: F11-new-font-naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Summary: [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_pac kage_naming_(2009-01-13) OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora FPC unexpectedly refused to approve a proposal that put into writing the package naming rules for fonts Fedora had been using in the past years, and made us change it. Deal with the fallout. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#fpc_renaming The revised font naming rules are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0r2P013834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1MUH014398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0w7i013936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0nFV013732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0pdn013782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0jFZ013632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0uk8013886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1GlC014275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD12Gh014038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD14PS014085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0lCT013683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1OtK014452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1Rw7014509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1JtX014333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1T42014562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD10ff013985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0vSf013911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:56 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1I0P014302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:17 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480451] [feh] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0xhk013959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480451 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:58 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480456] [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1LcN014372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:20 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1AZd014218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:04 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1NK0014420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:22 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD13Co014060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:02 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0oST013756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:49 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480444] [blender] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0hD3013601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480444 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:42 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0mJa013706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:47 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0trT013860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:54 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1SA1014534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:27 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1PCM014480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:24 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0kBI013656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:45 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480448] [egoboo-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171300.n0HD0qKV013808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480448 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:00:51 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480460] [lincity-ng] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1Ut5014588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480460 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:29 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD11q5014007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:00 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1hPj015087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2172015595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1Z78014746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1mI9015300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480467 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1o3l015364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480468 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1jh0015192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD241L015650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2IdI015916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1d68014956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480464 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1uXa015481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1xBr015540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1b2B014857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2GfQ015869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2BuN015779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1rjv015417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480463] [munin] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1apE014821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480463 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:35 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1WSJ014634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:31 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2EZA015825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:13 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480480] [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2F5l015849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:15 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1fVJ015023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:40 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480478] [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2Cii015806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:11 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1qGe015399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:51 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1X18014691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:33 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1cSP014913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:38 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2A6r015757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:10 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD29rw015737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:08 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD27VD015712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:06 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480474] [stellarium] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD25N1015685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480474 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:04 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1tmM015461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:54 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1wse015514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:57 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD23GU015632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:02 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1ij8015157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:43 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480481] [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD2H5d015895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:02:17 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1lYQ015248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:46 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171301.n0HD1nOS015342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:48 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:02:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480472] [seahorse-adventures] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171302.n0HD20BU015574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480472 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |480443 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:01:59 EDT --- FPC unexpectedly refused to ratify a proposal that put into writing our de-facto font package naming rules for the past years, and requested naming changes. As a result many font packages have been or will be renamed soon (including recently created packages) We have detected your package depends on such a font package. Please change your dependencies accordingly. See also ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F To ease the transition and avoid breaking F11 Alpha DejaVu has already been renamed but still declares its old names for full via rpm Provides. Those provides will be removed for Fedora 11 beta, to ensure no remaining legacy deps remains in the distribution. In the meanwhile packages depending on DejaVu full won't break and can be adapted at your leasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171322.n0HDMrks020512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on| |480269 --- Comment #6 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-17 08:22:51 EDT --- The bug has been fixed in CVS (font file removed, using a symbolic link to system fonts instead), but can't build the package until DevIL's bug is fixed. (bug #480269) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171334.n0HDYvpr022945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:34:56 EDT --- Also need to take care of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming (sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171335.n0HDZGgl005688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171336.n0HDaQoK005891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 Sylvain Beucler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Sylvain Beucler 2009-01-17 08:36:25 EDT --- Hi, I couldn't find information about a 'liberation-fonts' renaming. Can you be more specific? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171348.n0HDmbTw025557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171350.n0HDoVta026095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:50:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171350.n0HDoUgq026069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:50:29 EDT --- FPC requested last-minute font package naming changes and which will cause a build failure your side as soon as you rebuild. Please adapt your font package naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171348.n0HDmaFd025532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:48:35 EDT --- Also need to take care of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming (sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480451] [feh] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171347.n0HDllhL007872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480451 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171347.n0HDlmBM007901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480451, which changed state. Bug 480451 Summary: [feh] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480451 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171347.n0HDlapR007819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477373, which changed state. Bug 477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171347.n0HDlZim007785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:47:34 EDT --- FPC requested much stricter font package naming rules so some naming changes are in order too (sorry) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171355.n0HDtX77027202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480482] New: [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 Summary: [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: terminus-font AssignedTo: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 480443 Classification: Fedora See here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171402.n0HE2lcf028755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 09:02:46 EDT --- Liberation is one of the packages which has not been renamed yet, but will be soon, to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) If you want more info read the various meeting minutes referenced in the wiki page (some may not be posted yet), and fonts-related messages in fedora-devel and fedora-packaging mailing lists for the recent weeks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171430.n0HEUSVV015785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-01-17 09:30:26 EDT --- Gramps depends on "freefont"... Any idea what those will be renamed to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171438.n0HEc7qk002309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 09:38:06 EDT --- Even though our new guidelines are pretty strict that ultimately depends on its packager In the meanwhile you should consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 14:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171454.n0HEs07h019588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-01-17 09:53:59 EDT --- Adding myself on the CC list since my package gramps requires freefont. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480460] [lincity-ng] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171721.n0HHLvCP012920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480460 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-17 12:21:56 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171721.n0HHLw5o012945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480460, which changed state. Bug 480460 Summary: [lincity-ng] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480460 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171744.n0HHi0wh000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svenkate at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:43:59 EDT --- That font isn't unicode-compliant. The correct rendering will be produced using the steps I gave, viz. entering the combination "JoJO" in the given webpage's text entry. However as I said in comment 2 the correct rendering is already available in Lohit Kannada as the glyphs: U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf. Attachment 328837 from comment 8 doesn't match with the above 2 glyphs, so it looks like this bug isn't fixed yet. [Cc'ing Shankar Prasad since I suppose he will be able to verify this issue like he verified my update to bug 428427.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171751.n0HHpQBC002444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #12 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:51:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329287) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329287) Screenshot of fontforge showing the correct glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171756.n0HHugI4018916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #9 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:56:40 EDT --- Please note that there already are glyphs in the font named: U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?], U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?], U0CAA_U0CCB.pstf, and U0CAB_U0CCB.pstf, which show the correct conjuncts. Only some ligature rules in the font should be changed, like in the previous patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480463] [munin] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172016.n0HKG7jN011161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480463 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-17 15:16:06 EDT --- What? munin switched to the new font setup in bug 477428. Is this something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480463] [munin] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172043.n0HKhrLZ032497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480463 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 15:43:52 EDT --- FPC made me rename dejavu again :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172055.n0HKt6XH002219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de --- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-17 15:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The problem seems to have been fonts.{scale,dir} files that weren't upgraded > when I upgraded from f8 to f9. After doing > > fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1 This does not help on my system. F9 (upgraded from F8), xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-6.fc9.noarch fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.i386 fc-cache does not touch fonts.{scale,dir}, apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 21:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172103.n0HL3iWC003814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 16:03:42 EDT --- fontconfig does not use fonts.{scale,dir}. They're only needed by the old brittle legacy deprecated X11 core font systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 23:18:13 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090117231813.623FB7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9895 Modified Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf Removed Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: compliance with new font packaging guidelines --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif Index: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 7 Jan 2009 19:39:53 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 23:17:43 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip -Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf +Source1: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ %description %common_desc -%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf - %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,12 +35,28 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package roman +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Summary: General purpos sans-serif fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name} = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name} < 20030318-3 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +%common_desc + +General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations + +%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name}-roman = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-roman < 20030318-3 -%description roman +%description -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations @@ -63,10 +77,10 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do +for fontconf in %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done @@ -80,10 +94,16 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-3 +- rename according to new naming-guidelines + +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 +- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts + +* Wed Jan 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts -* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 +* Sun Jan 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 23:30:43 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090117233043.2208A7012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11908/F-10 Modified Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf Removed Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: compliance with new font packaging guidelines --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif Index: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-10/dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 7 Jan 2009 19:56:40 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 23:30:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip -Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf +Source1: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ %description %common_desc -%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf - %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,12 +35,28 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package roman +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Summary: General purpos sans-serif fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name} = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name} < 20030318-3 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +%common_desc + +General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations + +%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name}-roman = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-roman < 20030318-3 -%description roman +%description -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations @@ -63,10 +77,10 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do +for fontconf in %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done @@ -80,10 +94,13 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-3 +- rename according to new naming-guidelines + +* Wed Jan 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts -* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 +* Sun Jan 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 23:30:43 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090117233043.8EC2A70142@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11908/devel Modified Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Log Message: compliance with new font packaging guidelines Index: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/devel/dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 23:17:43 -0000 1.2 +++ dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 23:30:13 -0000 1.3 @@ -97,9 +97,6 @@ * Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-3 - rename according to new naming-guidelines -* Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 -- Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts - * Wed Jan 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts From slankes at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 17 23:30:43 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090117233043.5EE907012B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11908/F-9 Modified Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec Added Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf Removed Files: dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf Log Message: compliance with new font packaging guidelines --- NEW FILE dustin-dustismo-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Dustismo Dustismo sans-serif Index: dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-dustismo-fonts/F-9/dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 7 Jan 2009 19:56:40 -0000 1.1 +++ dustin-dustismo-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 23:30:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030318 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations Group: User Interface/X @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Dustismo.zip -Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf +Source1: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-roman-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ %description %common_desc -%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf - %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,12 +35,28 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package roman +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Summary: General purpos sans-serif fonts +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name} = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name} < 20030318-3 + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +%common_desc + +General purpose sans-serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations + +%_font_pkg -n sans -f %{fontconf}-sans.conf dustismo_bold_italic.ttf dustismo_bold.ttf dustismo_italic.ttf Dustismo.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts Summary: General purpose serif font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Provides: %{name}-roman = 20030318-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-roman < 20030318-3 -%description roman +%description -n %{fontname}-roman-fonts %common_desc General purpose serif font with bold, italic and bold-italic variations @@ -63,10 +77,10 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-roman.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do +for fontconf in %{fontconf}-sans.conf %{fontconf}-roman.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done @@ -80,10 +94,13 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Wed Dec 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 +* Sat Jan 17 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-3 +- rename according to new naming-guidelines + +* Wed Jan 07 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-2 - Change package-name to dustin-dustistmo-fonts -* Sun Dec 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 +* Sun Jan 04 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030318-1 - Use newer debian-source as source - Convert to -multi spec --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172339.n0HNdW6E030621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-17 18:39:31 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172337.n0HNbqjO030468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-17 18:37:51 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172352.n0HNqITo015630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480463, which changed state. Bug 480463 Summary: [munin] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480463 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 23:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480463] [munin] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172352.n0HNqH8s015605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480463 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-17 18:52:16 EDT --- ok. Switched to the new new name. ;) Closing rawhide. Re-open if anything more comes along. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 00:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480512] New: fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Summary: fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: michal at harddata.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The latest rawhide updates on my system brought the following fonts: bitstream-vera-sans-fonts bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts bitstream-vera-serif-fonts dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts dejavu-sans-fonts dejavu-sans-mono-fonts dejavu-serif-fonts With every of those packages I got a message like this: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: failed to write cache It turns out that messages are coming from /usr/bin/fc-cache and running '/usr/bin/fc-cache -v /usr/share/fonts/dejavu' produces the following: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: caching, new cache contents: 42 fonts, 0 dirs /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: failed to write cache /var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory /root/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory /usr/bin/fc-cache: failed Check with strace reveals what follows: open("/var/cache/fontconfig/12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-x86-64.cache-2", O_ RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/root/.fontconfig/12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-x86-64.cache-2", O_RDON LY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) write(2, "/usr/share/fonts/dejavu: failed t"..., 47) = 47 unlink("/var/cache/fontconfig/12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-x86-64.cache-2") = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) unlink("/root/.fontconfig/12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-x86-64.cache-2") = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Attempts to open new files with O_RDONLY? I do not think that this is going to work. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.90-3.git.63.g6bb4b9a.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: On every try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sun Jan 18 03:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 03:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090118030218.987B923F52F@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified A. Walton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awalton at gnome.org -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 07:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:16:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901180716.n0I7Gu0m007013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-01-18 02:16:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329296) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329296) fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 18 07:53:12 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090118075312.597131F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 18 07:53:14 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090118075314.27C3E1F825D@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 18 10:32:36 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:32:36 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090118103236.38AA1208207@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora devel was orphaned by nim To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181539.n0IFdPJt013550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #15 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-18 10:39:24 EDT --- Unfortunately, this "old brittle legacy etc." font system prevents, of all things, "fontforge" from launching. Is there any way to get "fontforge" to run? (The fontforge bug has been marked a duplicate of this one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181634.n0IGYqNp009936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480444, which changed state. Bug 480444 Summary: [blender] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480444 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480444] [blender] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181634.n0IGYp87009911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480444 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-18 11:34:50 EDT --- Should be done in blender-2.48a-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181641.n0IGfPX0024937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480474, which changed state. Bug 480474 Summary: [stellarium] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480474 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 16:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480474] [stellarium] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181641.n0IGfOGT024915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480474 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-18 11:41:23 EDT --- Should be done in stallarium-0.10.0-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181842.n0IIgbKq013023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 13:42:35 EDT --- You can always try the rawhide fontforge version, it's supposed to use cairo and other modern stuff now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 20:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182042.n0IKgLHV022772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rbhalera at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 15:42:18 EDT --- You still need to take care of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_font_packaging_changes_are_needed_with_post-1.13_fontpackages_.3F Since FPC unexpectedly decided to change our package naming rules. Apart that is looks nice so I'm going to approve it now and let you take care of the naming before the Fedora import. You can now continue starting from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a ? re-assigning Thank you for packaging a new font in Fedora ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182121.n0ILLIlc011065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 16:21:17 EDT --- Some additional QA comments (appart from the naming issue) ? do not define a fontdir, use the %{_fontdir} provided by the fontpackages macro set ? I think you'll find out if you check the descriptions of the resulting packages that they are a bit redundant ? I'm almost certain Behdad would be horrified by all the legacy compat hackery cruft in this package. Please consider dropping some of it. Or at least move it to separate optional -compat packages ? Please do not include the same files in the two subpackages; the multi-fonts official spec templates provides a common subpackage for this kind of stuff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182138.n0ILc4gs032742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|ville.skytta at iki.fi |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-18 16:38:03 EDT --- I can't keep up with the changes, please go ahead and fix it yourself. And use the same "-" for the %changelog entry as I've done, no fancy bullets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182140.n0ILep9a014235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 16:40:50 EDT --- Some QA comments: ? you should not include package names in descriptions; when the packages are renamed you get to fix all the descriptions ;) ? I feel it's a bit easier to read when the %_font_pkg are kept next to the corresponding subpackage declaration, but then I wrote the template ? for some reason yum does not want to update from smc-fonts-kalyani, but your spec look sane so it may be a yum bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182141.n0ILfsba014365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 16:41:53 EDT --- And FESCO approved the FPC naming changes so there's no longer any reason to wait -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182248.n0IMmwUt012989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-18 17:48:57 EDT --- What's the bottom line on what needs to be done ? I'm unable to parse the tree of links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182251.n0IMpnmZ027082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-18 17:51:48 EDT --- This issue seems to assume that I know what the issue is about. I don't know what the problem is and what the proposed solution in. I don't live and breathe the font situation de jour, all this issue says is "there is something about fonts, and there is a pile of links about it" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182327.n0INRa5d001401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 00:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:08:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190008.n0J08NOZ027411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480470, which changed state. Bug 480470 Summary: [publican] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 00:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190008.n0J08MwZ027386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fearn 2009-01-18 19:08:21 EDT --- We switched from dejavu to liberation some time ago and no longer have a Requires for the dejavu fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 01:32:27 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.30,1.31 Message-ID: <20090119013227.57158700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27488 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Used _fontdir macro instead of self-definition. - Created common subpackage for common files. - Created compat subpackage for uming backward compatibility. - Refined descriptions. Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.30 retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31 --- cjkunifonts.spec 14 Jan 2009 04:47:38 -0000 1.30 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 01:31:56 -0000 1.31 @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@ %define fontname cjkunifonts %define common_desc \ -Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts derived from original fonts made available by \ -Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by the CJK \ -Unifonts project. +CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts derived from original fonts made \ +available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ +the CJK Unifonts project. -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} %define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d @@ -13,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname} Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 13%{?dist} +Release: 14%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -40,7 +39,7 @@ Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 @@ -48,8 +47,7 @@ %description uming %common_desc -Ming face Chinese Unicode TrueType font derived from the original fonts \ -released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. +CJK Unifonts in Ming face. %_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc @@ -64,23 +62,12 @@ %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW -%{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf -%{catalogue}/%{name} %package ukai Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 @@ -88,8 +75,7 @@ %description ukai %common_desc -Kai face Chinese Unicode TrueType font derived from the original fonts \ -released by Arphic Technology and extended by the CJK Unifonts project. +CJK Unifonts in Kai face. %_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc @@ -104,16 +90,52 @@ %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO + +%package common +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. +License: Arphic +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 +Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 +Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 + +%description common +%common_desc + +CJK Unifonts common files. + +%files common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} +%package compat +Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. +License: Arphic +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-uming = %{version}-%{relsease} +Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 +Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 +Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 + +%description compat +%common_desc + +CJK Unifonts compatibility files. + +%files compat +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf + %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 @@ -126,14 +148,14 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} # *.ttc(ttf) -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ -%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/ +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +%__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ +%__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} @@ -154,14 +176,6 @@ done cd - -# backward compat to obsoleted ttf -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ - %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf - # ghostscript %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{gsdir} %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ @@ -173,12 +187,27 @@ # catalogue %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -%__ln_s %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +%__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} + +# backward compat to obsoleted ttf +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType +%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf +%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf %clean %__rm -fr ${buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-14.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477373 +- Used _fontdir macro instead of self-definition. +- Created common subpackage for common files. +- Created compat subpackage for uming backward compatibility. +- Refined descriptions. + * Wed Jan 14 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Included _font_pkg macro to conform new font packaging guidelines. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 02:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190215.n0J2FWd4017674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #17 from Adam Goode 2009-01-18 21:15:30 EDT --- I don't have time to guarantee work on this right now, many crazy things going on. Possibly I can find time before F11 ships! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 02:30:22 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel cjkunifonts.spec,1.31,1.32 Message-ID: <20090119023022.E059B700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2599 Modified Files: cjkunifonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-15.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Updated font renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. Index: cjkunifonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel/cjkunifonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.31 retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32 --- cjkunifonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 01:31:56 -0000 1.31 +++ cjkunifonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 02:29:52 -0000 1.32 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname cjkunifonts +%define fontname cjkuni %define common_desc \ CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts derived from original fonts made \ available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ %define umingbuilddir %{name}-uming-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{name}-ukai-%{version} -Name: %{fontname} +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 14%{?dist} +Release: 15%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -35,16 +35,18 @@ %description %common_desc -%package uming +%package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 +Obsoletes: %{name}-uming < %{version}-%{release} -%description uming +%description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts in Ming face. @@ -63,16 +65,18 @@ %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO -%package ukai +%package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 +Obsoletes: %{name}-ukai < %{version}-%{release} -%description ukai +%description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts in Kai face. @@ -91,7 +95,7 @@ %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO -%package common +%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -99,13 +103,14 @@ Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 +Obsoletes: %{name}-common < %{version}-%{release} -%description common +%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts common files. -%files common +%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN @@ -117,21 +122,23 @@ %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} -%package compat +%package -n %{fontname}-compat-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-uming = %{version}-%{relsease} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{relsease} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 +Obsoletes: %{name}-compat < %{version}-%{release} -%description compat +%description -n %{fontname}-compat-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts compatibility files. -%files compat +%files -n %{fontname}-compat-fonts %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf @@ -201,6 +208,10 @@ %__rm -fr ${buildroot} %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-15.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477373 +- Updated font renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Used _fontdir macro instead of self-definition. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 04:40:54 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.8,1.9 Message-ID: <20090119044054.4DD81700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21114 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Package renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 04:18:42 -0000 1.8 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 04:40:23 -0000 1.9 @@ -3,13 +3,12 @@ %define common_desc \ This package provides the free Korean TrueType fonts. -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 12%{?dist} +Release: 13%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -27,94 +26,95 @@ BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13 , xorg-x11-font-utils +BuildRequires: ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 %description %common_desc -%package common -Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts -License: Baekmuk -Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 - -%description common -%common_desc - -This package contains some common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. - -%package batang +%package -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Batang typeface License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Obsoletes: %{name}-batang < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -%description batang +%description -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts %common_desc -This package contains the Korean TrueType font Batang typeface. +Batang is Korean TrueType font in Serif typeface. %_font_pkg -n batang -f *-%{fontname}-batang*.conf batang.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} - -%package dotum +%package -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Dotum typeface License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Obsoletes: %{name}-dotum < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -%description dotum +%description -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts %common_desc -This package contains the Korean TrueType font Dotum typeface. +Dotum is Korean TrueType font in San-serif typeface. %_font_pkg -n dotum -f *-%{fontname}-dotum*.conf dotum.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} - -%package gulim +%package -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Gulim typeface License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Obsoletes: %{name}-gulim < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -%description gulim +%description -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts %common_desc -This package contains the Korean TrueType font Gulim typeface. +Gulim is Korean TrueType font in Monospace typeface. %_font_pkg -n gulim -f *-%{fontname}-gulim*.conf gulim.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} - -%package hline +%package -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Headline typeface License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 +Obsoletes: %{name}-hline < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -%description hline +%description -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts %common_desc -This package contains the Korean TrueType font Headline typeface. +Headline is Korean TrueType font in Black face. %_font_pkg -n hline -f *-%{fontname}-hline*.conf hline.ttf -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale +%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts +License: Baekmuk +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 + +%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%common_desc + +This is common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. + +%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} +%doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README +%{gsdir}/ %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} @@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} # font -%__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +%__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} for i in batang dotum gulim hline; do - %__install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} + %__install -p -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} done # fontconfig conf @@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ cd - # fonts.{scale,dir} -%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} \ - -o %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +%{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} \ + -o %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # ghostscript %__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{gsdir} @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ # catalogue %__install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -%__ln_s %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{fontname} +%__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{fontname} # convert Korean copyright file to utf8 %{_bindir}/iconv -f EUC-KR -t UTF-8 COPYRIGHT.ks > COPYRIGHT.ko @@ -163,11 +163,11 @@ %clean %__rm -rf %{buildroot} -%files common -%doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README -%{gsdir}/ - %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-13.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 +- Package renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. + * Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-12.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Repatched buildsys error.) From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 04:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190450.n0J4oEQp022135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 04:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190450.n0J4oDtj022021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-18 23:50:12 EDT --- built w/ new naming and splitting rules http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 05:43:09 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel 65-liberation-mono.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-liberation-sans.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-liberation-serif.conf, NONE, 1.1 liberation-fonts.spec, 1.27, 1.28 Message-ID: <20090119054309.C05A7700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29355 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Added Files: 65-liberation-mono.conf 65-liberation-sans.conf 65-liberation-serif.conf Log Message: reseolves 474734 incl fontconfig .conf files rename package for post-1.13 fontpackages macros --- NEW FILE 65-liberation-mono.conf --- Liberation Mono monospace monospace Liberation Mono --- NEW FILE 65-liberation-sans.conf --- Liberation Sans sans-serif sans-serif Liberation Sans --- NEW FILE 65-liberation-serif.conf --- Liberation Serif serif serif Liberation Serif Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.27 retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -r1.27 -r1.28 --- liberation-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 03:31:34 -0000 1.27 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 05:42:39 -0000 1.28 @@ -1,18 +1,16 @@ %define fontname liberation -%define fontconf <65>-%{fontname} %define archivename %{name}-%{version} %define common_desc \ The Liberation Fonts are intended to be replacements for the three most \ commonly used fonts on Microsoft systems: Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier \ New. -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -23,12 +21,15 @@ URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz -Requires: liberation-fonts-sans >= %{version} -Requires: liberation-fonts-serif >= %{version} -Requires: liberation-fonts-mono >= %{version} +Requires: %{name}-sans >= %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-serif >= %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-mono >= %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-serif < %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-mono < %{version}-%{release} BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch -Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel xorg-x11-font-utils +Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils %description %common_desc @@ -36,33 +37,43 @@ Meta-package of Liberation fonts which installs Sans, Serif, and Monospace families. -%package common +%files +%{nil} + +%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 -%description common +%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts %common_desc Shared common files of Liberation font families. +%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING License.txt README +%dir %{_fontdir} +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale +%{catalogue}/%{name} + %define mk_pkg()\ -%package %1\ +%package -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts\ Summary: %3 fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft %4\ License: Liberation\ Group: User Interface/X\ -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common >= %{version}\ +Obsoletes: %{name}-%1 < %{version}-%{release}\ +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13\ +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}\ \ -%description %1\ +%description -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts\ %common_desc\ \ -%3 TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft %4.\ +This is %3 TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft %4.\ \ -%files %1\ -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)\ -%dir %{fontdir}\ -%{fontdir}/Liberation%2-*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n %1 -f *-%{fontname}-%1*.conf Liberation%2-*.ttf %mk_pkg sans Sans Sans Arial %mk_pkg serif Serif Sans-serif Times_New_Roman @@ -79,42 +90,23 @@ %install rm -rf %{buildroot} -# fonts -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -m 0644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -# configuration +# fonts .ttf +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +# fontconfig .conf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d # catalogue install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} -ln -sf %{fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} - -# generate fonts.dir and fonts.scale -mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{fontdir} - -%post -if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then - /usr/bin/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then - /usr/bin/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - -%files -%{nil} - -%files common -%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING License.txt README -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.scale -%{catalogue}/%{name} +ln -sf %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} +# fonts.{dir,scale} +mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-4.fc11 +- Resolves: thbz#477410 +- Package renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages macros. + * Fri Jan 09 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-3.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477410 (Convert to new font packaging guidelines.) From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 06:08:46 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.28,1.29 Message-ID: <20090119060847.065F6700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv455 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: resolves: rhbz#477410 updated .spec w/ new renaming Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.28 retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29 --- liberation-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 05:42:39 -0000 1.28 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 06:08:16 -0000 1.29 @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ Group: User Interface/X URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz +Source1: 65-liberation-sans.conf +Source2: 65-liberation-serif.conf +Source3: 65-liberation-mono.conf Requires: %{name}-sans >= %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-serif >= %{version}-%{release} @@ -59,32 +62,56 @@ %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} -%define mk_pkg()\ -%package -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts\ -Summary: %3 fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft %4\ -License: Liberation\ -Group: User Interface/X\ -Obsoletes: %{name}-%1 < %{version}-%{release}\ -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13\ -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release}\ -\ -%description -n %{fontname}-%1-fonts\ -%common_desc\ -\ -This is %3 TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft %4.\ -\ -%_font_pkg -n %1 -f *-%{fontname}-%1*.conf Liberation%2-*.ttf - -%mk_pkg sans Sans Sans Arial -%mk_pkg serif Serif Sans-serif Times_New_Roman -%mk_pkg mono Mono Monospace Courier_New +%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +Summary: Sans fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial +License: Liberation +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts +%common_desc + +This is Sans TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Arial. + +%_font_pkg -n sans -f 65-%{fontname}-sans.conf LiberationSans-*.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts +Summary: San-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman +License: Liberation +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts +%common_desc + +This is Sans-serif TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Times \ +New Roman. + +%_font_pkg -n serif -f 65-%{fontname}-serif.conf LiberationSerif-*.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts +Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New +License: Liberation +Group: User Interface/X +Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < %{version}-%{release} +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts +%common_desc + +This is Monospace TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Courier \ +New. + +%_font_pkg -n mono -f 65-%{fontname}-mono.conf LiberationMono-*.ttf %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}.devel -%clean -rm -rf %{buildroot} - %build %{nil} @@ -94,7 +121,16 @@ install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # fontconfig .conf -install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} +%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +cd ../ +for fconf in %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} +do + %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ + %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/`basename $fconf` \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/`basename $fconf` +done +cd - # catalogue install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} ln -sf %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} @@ -102,6 +138,9 @@ mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} mkfontscale %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +%clean +rm -rf %{buildroot} + %changelog * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-4.fc11 - Resolves: thbz#477410 From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190613.n0J6Dw5X003014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190613.n0J6DvlH002989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 01:13:56 EDT --- renamed and rebuilt with %_font_pkg macro http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190617.n0J6H92i022629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Depends on| |253813 --- Comment #12 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 01:17:08 EDT --- updated in cvs tree, requested rel-eng for fedora 11 tree of new package name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190651.n0J6prgn028237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 01:51:52 EDT --- Please take a look at the pile of links, they contain the info you ask for. If I repeated it here and in all the bugs that need it I'd only forget stuff, make mistakes, and waste everyone's time. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming_fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190652.n0J6qx2o009203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 01:52:58 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming_fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190656.n0J6uWxQ028975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 01:56:32 EDT --- Drat. Added the right link in the wrong report. In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 07:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190702.n0J72EZT030004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 02:02:14 EDT --- And just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this latest renaming run, FPC forced it on us, I'm only the poor sod who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not at me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 07:40:17 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090119074017.50B961F828E@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 07:40:19 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090119074019.333CD1F828F@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190909.n0J99PLd020613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-19 04:09:24 EDT --- So this is change font requires. Adapted to the ones I see at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190926.n0J9Qq3T006293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 10:18:29 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090119101829.4DDBD700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9432 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: - Rename subpackages according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) - Differentiate between macro and variable (fontconf->fconf) Index: mgopen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- mgopen-fonts.spec 30 Dec 2008 14:07:38 -0000 1.9 +++ mgopen-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 10:17:58 -0000 1.10 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.%{upstream_date} -Release: 9%{?dist} +Release: 10%{?dist} Summary: Truetype greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: MgOpen @@ -31,86 +31,80 @@ # The LICENCE file is an excerpt from the html page Source2: %{fontname}-fontconfig.tar.gz # Tarball of fontconfig files for each font - BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem - %description %common_desc + %package common Summary: Truetype greek fonts, common files (documentation???) Group: User Interface/X - -Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts<0.20050515-8 - %description common %common_desc - This package consists of files used by other MgOpen packages. + + %package compat Summary: Truetype greek fonts, compatibility package Group: User Interface/X - -Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts<0.20050515-6 - -Requires: %{name}-canonica, %{name}-cosmetica, %{name}-modata, %{name}-moderna - +Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts<0.20050515-8 +Requires: %{fontname}-canonica-fonts, %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts, +Requires: %{fontname}-modata-fonts, %{fontname}-moderna-fonts %description compat %common_desc %compat_desc -%package canonica + +%package -n %{fontname}-canonica-fonts Summary: Truetype variable-stroke-width serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} - -%description canonica +%description -n %{fontname}-canonica-fonts %common_desc - This package contains the MgOpen Canonica serif variable-stroke-width typeface, which is based on the design of Times Roman. %_font_pkg -n canonica -f %{fontconf}-canonica.conf MgOpenCanonica*.ttf -%package cosmetica + + +%package -n %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts Summary: Truetype variable-stroke-width sans serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} - -%description cosmetica +%description -n %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts %common_desc - This package contains the MgOpen Cosmetica sans serif variable-stroke-width typeface, which is based on the design of Optima. %_font_pkg -n cosmetica -f %{fontconf}-cosmetica.conf MgOpenCosmetica*.ttf -%package modata + + +%package -n %{fontname}-modata-fonts Summary: Truetype fixed-stroke-width sans serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} - -%description modata +%description -n %{fontname}-modata-fonts %common_desc - This package contains the MgOpen Modata sans serif fixed-stroke-width which is based on the design of VAG rounded. %_font_pkg -n modata -f %{fontconf}-modata.conf MgOpenModata*.ttf -%package moderna + + +%package -n %{fontname}-moderna-fonts Summary: Truetype fixed-stroke-width sans serif font faces Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} - -%description moderna +%description -n %{fontname}-moderna-fonts %common_desc - This package contains the MgOpen Moderna sans serif fixed-stroke-width typeface which is based on the design of Helvetica. @@ -141,11 +135,11 @@ install -m 0644 -p fontconfig/%{fontname}-moderna.conf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-moderna.conf -for fontconf in %{fontconf}-canonica.conf \ +for fconf in %{fontconf}-canonica.conf \ %{fontconf}-cosmetica.conf \ %{fontconf}-modata.conf \ %{fontconf}-moderna.conf ; do - ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ + ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done @@ -163,6 +157,11 @@ %files compat %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-9 +- Rename subpackages according to + http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) +- Differentiate between macro and variable (fontconf->fconf) + * Tue Dec 30 2008 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-9 - Restructure spec file according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480450] [fbida] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOdcE004919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480450 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:38 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOnsH005094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:48 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOhce004990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:42 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOYOE004839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:33 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP5Rv005695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:05 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOrKX005175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:52 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOukR005250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:56 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOjIA005025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:45 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOoLF005107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:49 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOgs2004973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:41 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480478] [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP4nK005677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:03 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480480] [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP7pc005730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:06 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480456] [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOivV005008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:43 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOqlX005133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:51 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOfxw004956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:40 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP0PP005312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:59 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP1Xx005329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:00 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOve5005268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:57 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOl2i005050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:46 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP2UG005639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:01 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOZQn004857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:34 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480448] [egoboo-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOaIZ004879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480448 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:35 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOc1P004902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:37 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480481] [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP8pU005743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:08 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOmIq005071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:47 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOsqe005209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:53 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOeTH004938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:39 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191025.n0JAP3Rr005656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:25:02 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOtVO005228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:55 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480472] [seahorse-adventures] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOxji005290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480472 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:58 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191024.n0JAOX6f004821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 05:24:30 EDT --- [Natural language informal translation] In this issue you're just warned font packages you depend on have been/will be renamed shortly, so your package dependencies will break. There is not much to do except changing your deps once that happens (dejavu has been renamed, liberation has in koji but has not hit rawhide yet, smc had been too, and you may depend on others yet) [Just to be 100% clear I didn't ask for this last renaming run, FPC demanded naming changes for "consistency" against my advice, I'm only the good little soldier who gets to implement their decision and be yelled at, so if you're not happy complain at them not me.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191027.n0JART5v006561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191027.n0JARSgK006534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-19 05:27:27 EDT --- Fixed in 0.20050519-10 (rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191117.n0JBHawP030027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191124.n0JBOFYc018501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191125.n0JBPN4t031809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 --- Comment #7 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-19 06:25:22 EDT --- Opened up a review request for the renaming of the package. As discussed in fedora-devel [1], renaming needs a re-review. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/93869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191123.n0JBN80W031144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #17 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-19 06:23:07 EDT --- Opened up a review request for the renaming of the package. As discussed in fedora-devel [1], renaming needs a re-review. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/93869 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191123.n0JBNlcX031249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-19 06:23:46 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191123.n0JBNmsQ031274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 14:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191417.n0JEHCTJ003345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480478, which changed state. Bug 480478 Summary: [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 14:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480478] [vodovod] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191417.n0JEHB1l003321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480478 Karel Voln? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Karel Voln? 2009-01-19 09:17:10 EDT --- fixed -Requires: dejavu-fonts-sans-mono +Requires: dejavu-sans-mono-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 18:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191854.n0JIs9er015051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-19 13:54:08 EDT --- Please see comment 2, I don't think it's unfair at all to ask you to fix it after I tried to keep up and have already made two changes at your request during the past few weeks (bug 477478). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480669] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: beland at alum.mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=329386) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329386) excerpts from yum output When installing baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* as part of the latest rawhide, I get a number of errors from yum, including a scriptlet failure. See attached log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191917.n0JJHAdx020457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|baekmuk-ttf-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 14:17:09 EDT --- Yes, fontconfig is broken in rawhide right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191918.n0JJIp4D001396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |beland at alum.mit.edu --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 14:18:48 EDT --- *** Bug 480669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191918.n0JJInjv001358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 14:18:48 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480512 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 20:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480685] New: fontforge multilib conflict Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontforge multilib conflict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 Summary: fontforge multilib conflict Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: phil at fifi.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: yum install fontforge.i386 fontforge.x86_64 yields: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fontforge/python/excepthook.pyc from install of fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.x86_64 file /usr/share/fontforge/python/excepthook.pyo from install of fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.x86_64 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 21:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192123.n0JLNCQU031059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 16:23:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ? for some reason yum does not want to update from smc-fonts-kalyani, but your > spec look sane so it may be a yum bug After spending ~ 3h trying to understand why smc-fonts would not update James Antill noticed there is a typo in the versions used in the obsoletes rules: The kalyani subpackage declares Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04-1.3 instead of Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04.1-3 James advises simplifying your release numbering. He also stated you owe him a cherry coke :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 22:11:54 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.31, 1.32 fontconfig.spec, 1.113, 1.114 sources, 1.32, 1.33 Message-ID: <20090119221154.161B7700F8@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18177 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 - Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.31 retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32 --- .cvsignore 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.31 +++ .cvsignore 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.32 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.90.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.91.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.113 retrieving revision 1.114 diff -u -r1.113 -r1.114 --- fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:58:10 -0000 1.113 +++ fontconfig.spec 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.114 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.90 -Release: 3.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.91 +Release: 1.git.64.g9feaf34%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 +- Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 + * Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.90-3.git.63.g6bb4b9a - Install fc-scan and fc-query Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.32 retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33 --- sources 16 Jan 2009 05:44:55 -0000 1.32 +++ sources 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.33 @@ -1 +1 @@ -c907dd0ebec0e95ddae1f5f65b1ada4e fontconfig-2.6.90.tar.gz +b7698d79afb8d3d01b206b9a4eea9ff2 fontconfig-2.6.91.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192224.n0JMOOY3027946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-19 17:24:23 EDT --- Will hit rawhide tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192310.n0JNARNY020244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192310.n0JNAQfZ020217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 18:10:25 EDT --- Thank you for the cheerful CVS comment. However http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/rcssserver3d/rcssserver3d.spec?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 is still missing something :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192336.n0JNaF3q025749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192336.n0JNaEr6025723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 18:36:13 EDT --- Some QA 1. you do not need a Requires: fontpackages-filesystem in the main package 2. your new packages do not seem to obsolete the previous ones correctly. You need spaces around < in Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts<0.20050515-8 3. If you know the design sources of the other fonts, you should not provide fontconfig substitution rules for VAG Rounded only didn't notice anything else, but then it's getting awfully late here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192344.n0JNiaBr027185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480470, which changed state. Bug 480470 Summary: [publican] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192344.n0JNiZbM027158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192346.n0JNkOFF027855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192346.n0JNkMg2027792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192347.n0JNlQtY012878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: cjkunifonts |Package Review: cjkunifonts |(split from fonts-chinese) |(split from fonts-chinese) | |[renamed to cjkuni-fonts] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192347.n0JNlpJx028139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 19 23:56:06 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.32, 1.33 fontconfig.spec, 1.114, 1.115 sources, 1.33, 1.34 Message-ID: <20090119235606.B677770031@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5431 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82 - Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g167bb82 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.32 retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33 --- .cvsignore 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.32 +++ .cvsignore 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.33 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.91.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.114 retrieving revision 1.115 diff -u -r1.114 -r1.115 --- fontconfig.spec 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.114 +++ fontconfig.spec 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.115 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.91 -Release: 1.git.64.g9feaf34%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.92 +Release: 1.git.64.g167bb82%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82 +- Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g167bb82 + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 - Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- sources 19 Jan 2009 22:11:23 -0000 1.33 +++ sources 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.34 @@ -1 +1 @@ -b7698d79afb8d3d01b206b9a4eea9ff2 fontconfig-2.6.91.tar.gz +3aef92ac30c2ed24ea89a5007ecbf588 fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200008.n0K082FJ017080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jfearn at redhat.com |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200018.n0K0I2ha001676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477410, which changed state. Bug 477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200018.n0K0I1s3001650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 19:18:00 EDT --- Some QA review: 1. the Microsoft font names are likely to be trademarked to hell, I hope someone checked with spot when they were added to the package description 2. the URL should probably be changed to the new fedorahosted Liberation homepage 3. Requires: %{name}-sans >= %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-serif >= %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-mono >= %{version}-%{release} is going to create a huge mess. You don't have any packages named %{name}-foo anymore, so package resolvers won't know what to do 4. If you want to create an upgrade path (good idea!) I suggest you do it in a compat package like dejavu, vera and mgopen. The advantage of a compat package is it has a different package name, so you don't mix past and present names, and is obviously going away someday, so people won't expect you to keep it forever For example the new vera spec includes: %package compat Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9 Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %description compat This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to the new package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please do not reference it or depend on it in any way. [?] %files compat IIRC the empty %files is needed for rpm to create an empty subpackage 5. this is somewhat confusing, but you do not need for the common subpackage to be named foo-common-fonts. I realise I hadn't really explained this point, so I've added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F to the FAQ. You're not the first one to ask/make the mistake (though it's mainly cosmetical) 6. Liberation is a bit special. It has specific fontconfig rules in fontconfig itself to handle MS fonts substitution, so Behdad would like you not to include fontconfig files in your liberation package (but do add them to non-Liberation packages). Vera had the same treatment when it mattered and so our vera package does not include fontconfig rules either 7. you do not need to require fontpackages-filesystem in the font subpackages, they require the common subpackage and it requires in turn fontpackages-filesystem do all is going to be well 8. you do not need to repeat the License info in each subpackage, if you don't list it the value of the main License declaration is going to be inherited by subpackages (you can check by doing a less on the package files once they're built) (you should not need to repeat Group either but this problem has only be fixed recently in a rpm version not available on our builders) 9. you should not Obsoletes: %{name}-foo < %{version}-%{release} in your font subpackage, but Obsolete packages older than the particular version where the renaming occured. For liberation probably Obsoletes: %{name}-foo < 1.04.93-4 10. The summary of your serif package has a problem, Liberation serif is not a sans-serif font 11. someday you really need to build the ttf from sfds in %build. In the meanwhile at least use the -p flag when installing the ttf files install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} 12. what's the purpose of the cd ../ in the middle of %install? 13. you should probably create %{buildroot}%{catalogue} the same way the other directories were created at the beginning of %install And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200110.n0K1AY7t029164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200109.n0K19tdH011197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200112.n0K1CnTi011962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 20:12:48 EDT --- Hi spot, what would be your comment about mentioning Microsoft's font name in liberation-fonts' descriptions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200218.n0K2IpLX008368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-19 21:18:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk > today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too I'll refine the baekmuk first. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 02:33:32 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.29,1.30 Message-ID: <20090120023332.CE131700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29125 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-5.fc11 - Resolved: rhbz#477410 - Refined .spec file based on Mailhot's review on rhbz. Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.29 retrieving revision 1.30 diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30 --- liberation-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 06:08:16 -0000 1.29 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:33:02 -0000 1.30 @@ -18,18 +18,12 @@ # GPLv3. This license is Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 incompatible. License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X -URL: https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ +URL: https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ Source0: liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz -Source1: 65-liberation-sans.conf -Source2: 65-liberation-serif.conf -Source3: 65-liberation-mono.conf - -Requires: %{name}-sans >= %{version}-%{release} -Requires: %{name}-serif >= %{version}-%{release} -Requires: %{name}-mono >= %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-serif < %{version}-%{release} -Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-mono < %{version}-%{release} + +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-serif < 1.04.93-4 +Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-mono < 1.04.93-4 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch Buildrequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils @@ -43,18 +37,17 @@ %files %{nil} -%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Shared common files of Liberation font families. -License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 -%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc Shared common files of Liberation font families. -%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING License.txt README %dir %{_fontdir} @@ -63,42 +56,33 @@ %{catalogue}/%{name} %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts -Summary: Sans fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial -License: Liberation +Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc -This is Sans TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Arial. +This is Sans-serif TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Arial. -%_font_pkg -n sans -f 65-%{fontname}-sans.conf LiberationSans-*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n sans LiberationSans-*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts -Summary: San-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman -License: Liberation +Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: %{name}-serif < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc -This is Sans-serif TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Times \ -New Roman. +This is Serif TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Times New \ +Roman. -%_font_pkg -n serif -f 65-%{fontname}-serif.conf LiberationSerif-*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n serif LiberationSerif-*.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New -License: Liberation Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: %{name}-sans < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts @@ -107,7 +91,7 @@ This is Monospace TrueType fonts that replaced commonly used Microsoft Courier \ New. -%_font_pkg -n mono -f 65-%{fontname}-mono.conf LiberationMono-*.ttf +%_font_pkg -n mono LiberationMono-*.ttf %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}.devel @@ -119,20 +103,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} # fonts .ttf install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -install -m 0644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -# fontconfig .conf -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} -%__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} -cd ../ -for fconf in %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} -do - %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ - %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/`basename $fconf` \ - %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/`basename $fconf` -done -cd - +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # catalogue -install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} ln -sf %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} # fonts.{dir,scale} mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} @@ -142,6 +115,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-5.fc11 +- Resolved: rhbz#477410 +- Refined .spec file based on Mailhot's review on rhbz. + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-4.fc11 - Resolves: thbz#477410 - Package renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages macros. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 02:36:54 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.30,1.31 Message-ID: <20090120023654.8D577700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29669 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: updated release num Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.30 retrieving revision 1.31 diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31 --- liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:33:02 -0000 1.30 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:36:24 -0000 1.31 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 02:43:49 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel 65-liberation-mono.conf, 1.1, NONE 65-liberation-sans.conf, 1.1, NONE 65-liberation-serif.conf, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090120024349.BEE99700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31036 Removed Files: 65-liberation-mono.conf 65-liberation-sans.conf 65-liberation-serif.conf Log Message: removed uncessary fontconfig files --- 65-liberation-mono.conf DELETED --- --- 65-liberation-sans.conf DELETED --- --- 65-liberation-serif.conf DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200250.n0K2oXQx028893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 02:55:29 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.9,1.10 Message-ID: <20090120025529.8BFF9700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv765 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Refined according to Mailhot's comments (477410) on liberaton fonts. Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 04:40:23 -0000 1.9 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:54:59 -0000 1.10 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 13%{?dist} +Release: 14%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -34,11 +34,9 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Batang typeface -License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Obsoletes: %{name}-batang < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: %{name}-batang < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts @@ -50,11 +48,9 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Dotum typeface -License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Obsoletes: %{name}-dotum < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: %{name}-dotum < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts @@ -66,11 +62,9 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Gulim typeface -License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Obsoletes: %{name}-gulim < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: %{name}-gulim < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts @@ -82,11 +76,9 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Headline typeface -License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 -Obsoletes: %{name}-hline < %{version}-%{release} -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 +Obsoletes: %{name}-hline < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts @@ -96,19 +88,17 @@ %_font_pkg -n hline -f *-%{fontname}-hline*.conf hline.ttf -%package -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts -License: Baekmuk Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 -%description -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc This is common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts. -%files -n %{fontname}-common-fonts +%files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale @@ -164,6 +154,10 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-14.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 +- Refined according to Mailhot's comments (477410) on liberaton fonts. + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Package renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200255.n0K2tSSL014706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200255.n0K2tTgl014743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200328.n0K3SugQ005079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #8 from Rajeesh 2009-01-19 22:28:55 EDT --- Ah, my bad! Will fix them all soon. I offer him a beer next time we meet ;-) Thanks Nicolas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200713.n0K7D5d9014274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200713.n0K7D2vf014208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #38 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-20 02:13:01 EDT --- fedora-review+ ? will review the cjkunifonts changes anyway and it's easier for me if they're done directly with the new srpm name in the new srpm component before the review (and not the reverse) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200730.n0K7Umgm002874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 02:30:46 EDT --- Nicolas, then better to open new review bugs IMHO than reopening old reviews for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 07:49:57 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: baekmuk-ttf-fonts Message-ID: <20090120074957.4C3FA1F8258@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> baekmuk-ttf-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On x86_64: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On i386: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc64: baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc: baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On x86_64: baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On i386: baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc64: baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc: baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On x86_64: baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On i386: baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc64: baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc: baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On x86_64: baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On i386: baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 On ppc64: baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-14.fc11.noarch requires baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts = 0:2.2-14.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 07:49:56 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090120074956.454971F825F@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 07:49:57 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: liberation-fonts Message-ID: <20090120074957.80E801F825F@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> liberation-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On x86_64: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On i386: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On ppc64: liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On ppc: liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On x86_64: liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On i386: liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On ppc64: liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On ppc: liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On x86_64: liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On i386: liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 On ppc64: liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-5.fc11.noarch requires liberation-common-fonts = 0:1.04.93-5.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 07:49:58 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090120074958.1CCD51F8258@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200826.n0K8QCns011952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-20 03:26:11 EDT --- I don't know, the whole renaming process is under-formalised. Ask nirik -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200917.n0K9H73f023113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Roy Rankin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #4 from Roy Rankin 2009-01-20 04:17:06 EDT --- Split into denemo and denemo-music-fonts packages in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200920.n0K9KcEe023918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480458, which changed state. Bug 480458 Summary: [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200920.n0K9KbnI023891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:20:36 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201001.n0KA1FtE031912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wKR1030930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480465, which changed state. Bug 480465 Summary: [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200959.n0K9x3qc031132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480476, which changed state. Bug 480476 Summary: [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201001.n0KA1ICn031944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480466, which changed state. Bug 480466 Summary: [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wiRV031049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480472, which changed state. Bug 480472 Summary: [seahorse-adventures] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480472 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wJsD030891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:58:18 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200959.n0K9x3H2031106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:59:01 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480472] [seahorse-adventures] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wiW2031024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480472 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:58:42 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wsUr012511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480475, which changed state. Bug 480475 Summary: [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9w9K7012328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480448, which changed state. Bug 480448 Summary: [egoboo-data] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480448 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wW9P012425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480471, which changed state. Bug 480471 Summary: [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wrcW012485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:58:52 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480448] [egoboo-data] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9w8LJ012303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480448 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:58:07 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200958.n0K9wVO5012398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-20 04:58:30 EDT --- Fixed package is on its way to rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:02:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201002.n0KA20gK013685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #8 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-20 05:01:58 EDT --- needs another attempt, will be >= 3.0.1-15.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480750] New: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: yum update fails reporting liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts all require liberation-common-fonts, however, the package name appears to be liberation-fonts-common Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04-93-5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum update 2. 3. Actual results: yum reports missing dependencies Expected results: update succeeds Additional info: The liberation-fonts.spec file creates a package liberation-fonts-common, but liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts have a dependency on liberation-common-fonts (i.e. comman and fonts reversed). The same applies for baekmuk-ttf-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 10:55:53 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090120105553.2BD27700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1909 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec sources Log Message: - Fix comments from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425#c5 (thanks Nicolas Mailhot) - remove requires: fontpackages-filesystem from the main package, add it to the -common subpackage. - put space around "<" in Obsoletes to make rpm understand it - provide fontconfig substitution rules for all the families (according to http://www.ellak.gr/fonts/mgopen/index.en.html) Index: mgopen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- mgopen-fonts.spec 19 Jan 2009 10:17:58 -0000 1.10 +++ mgopen-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 10:55:22 -0000 1.11 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.%{upstream_date} -Release: 10%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist} Summary: Truetype greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: MgOpen @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel -Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description %common_desc @@ -42,6 +41,7 @@ %package common Summary: Truetype greek fonts, common files (documentation???) Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-fileysystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other MgOpen packages. @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ %package compat Summary: Truetype greek fonts, compatibility package Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts<0.20050515-8 +Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts < 0.20050515-8 Requires: %{fontname}-canonica-fonts, %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts, Requires: %{fontname}-modata-fonts, %{fontname}-moderna-fonts %description compat @@ -157,7 +157,16 @@ %files compat %changelog -* Mon Jan 19 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-9 +* Tue Jan 20 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-11 +- Fix comments from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425#c5 + (thanks Nicolas Mailhot) + - remove requires: fontpackages-filesystem from the main package, add it + to the -common subpackage. + - put space around "<" in Obsoletes to make rpm understand it + - provide fontconfig substitution rules for all the families (according to + http://www.ellak.gr/fonts/mgopen/index.en.html) + +* Mon Jan 19 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-10 - Rename subpackages according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2009-01-13) - Differentiate between macro and variable (fontconf->fconf) Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 30 Dec 2008 14:07:38 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 20 Jan 2009 10:55:22 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ 9ad4bba3d173e92734320286bfff4c8e MgOpen-20050515.tar.gz eb667a1458a92bc4d4e9a1f5924f6e61 MgOpen-20050515-doc.tar.gz -c01d7492aa697128799b5c2cc8dd1997 mgopen-fontconfig.tar.gz +99aed78f4c58e3ca4b7502f0adff7075 mgopen-fontconfig.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201104.n0KB4FeF012142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 11:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201104.n0KB4EC2012117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-20 06:04:13 EDT --- All the previous comments fixed in 0.20050515-11 (rawhide). Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201204.n0KC4GKC025191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #9 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-20 07:04:15 EDT --- :) Are you referring to a missing change log or something else?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201237.n0KCbRMX014087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #20 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-20 07:37:24 EDT --- hi, I changed the fontconfig in accordance with the basic font config template. I think the rest is fine now? Here are the packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/cf-bonveno-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 12:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201244.n0KCiqed032650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #29 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-20 07:44:49 EDT --- hi, Made the change. packages : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard_sfd_fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 13:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] New: Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Summary: Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: markmc at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 476773 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- On a fresh 20090120 rawhide install with fontconfig-2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34.fc11.x86_64 : $> find ~ ... ./${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/e19de935dec46bbf3ed114ee4965548a-x86-64.cache-2 ./${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/3830d5c3ddfd5cd38a049b759396e72e-x86-64.cache-2 ./${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/b79f3aaa7d385a141ab53ec885cc22a8-x86-64.cache-2 ./${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/0251a5afa6ac727a1e32b7d4d4aa7cf0-x86-64.cache-2 ./${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/87f5e051180a7a75f16eb6fe7dbd3749-x86-64.cache-2 Seems to be fontconfig from a look at strace Adding to F11Alpha since it's very ugly and should be easy enough to fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201556.n0KFuRVF006950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-20 10:56:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hi spot, what would be your comment about mentioning Microsoft's font name in > liberation-fonts' descriptions? Yeah, I think this is fine. You should not use any trademark symbols here, but the way these trademarks are used is well within the realm of fair use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201601.n0KG1BNT007971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicholas Wourms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nwourms at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Nicholas Wourms 2009-01-20 11:01:10 EDT --- You switched back to the fonts-common package name but you forgot to change the Requires: to reflect this change. Do you even bother trying to install the packages after you make the changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201614.n0KGEoX7010952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicholas Wourms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nwourms at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Nicholas Wourms 2009-01-20 11:14:49 EDT --- Please update the publican package to reflect this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201730.n0KHUELt026756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201730.n0KHUDlH026733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201730.n0KHUgIx010367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-20 12:30:42 EDT --- Adding CC for slingshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 17:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201755.n0KHt5ns032680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-01-20 12:55:04 EDT --- Great ! The package is now APPROVED by me ! Congrats ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201802.n0KI22OY017059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-20 13:02:01 EDT --- How's this? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79532 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201814.n0KIEMs6019117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-20 13:14:21 EDT --- :D my first approved package! thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480480] [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201842.n0KIguMO024428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-20 13:42:55 EDT --- Fixed for dejavu in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201842.n0KIgvIR024452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480480, which changed state. Bug 480480 Summary: [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480480 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480456] [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201913.n0KJDIRb030751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-20 14:13:17 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide for dejavu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 19:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201913.n0KJDKxZ030778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480456, which changed state. Bug 480456 Summary: [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 20:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202058.n0KKw6WN023268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-20 15:58:05 EDT --- I built fontconfig-2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82.fc11 on the same day. That fixes this. Not sure why that one didn't show up in rawhide instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202123.n0KLNnB9028960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-20 16:23:49 EDT --- ok, so this is a rename of an existing font? I can't seem to get to any of the above spec urls... If this package correctly obsoletes the old package, I can make the new package and you can follow the end of life procedure on the old package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 22:54:14 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.31,1.32 Message-ID: <20090120225414.52578700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14119 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies. Yay, font activism Index: liberation-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.31 retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32 --- liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:36:24 -0000 1.31 +++ liberation-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 22:53:43 -0000 1.32 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows fonts Version: 1.04.93 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} # The license of the Liberation Fonts is a EULA that contains GPLv2 and two # exceptions: # The first exception is the standard FSF font exception. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: Sans-serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Arial Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: Serif fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Times New Roman Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts Summary: Monospace fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Courier New Group: User Interface/X -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-mono-fonts %common_desc @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen - 1.04.93-6.fc11 +- Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies + * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 1.04.93-5.fc11 - Resolved: rhbz#477410 - Refined .spec file based on Mailhot's review on rhbz. From mclasen at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 20 22:57:31 2009 From: mclasen at fedoraproject.org (Matthias Clasen) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.10,1.11 Message-ID: <20090120225732.03582700F9@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14804 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.10 retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 02:54:59 -0000 1.10 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 22:57:01 -0000 1.11 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 14%{?dist} +Release: 15%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-batang < 2.2-13 -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts %common_desc @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-dotum < 2.2-13 -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts %common_desc @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-gulim < 2.2-13 -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts %common_desc @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-hline < 2.2-13 -Requires: %{fontname}-common-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts %common_desc @@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen - 2.2-15.fc11 +- Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies + * Tue Jan 20 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Refined according to Mailhot's comments (477410) on liberaton fonts. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202304.n0KN4tM9013474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:04:54 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202306.n0KN6HIL014053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:06:16 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202331.n0KNVnJs027589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #42 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:31:49 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-16.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202344.n0KNiTHb021177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quentin at armitage.org.uk --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- *** Bug 480750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480750] liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202344.n0KNiT4I021161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- fixed on rawhide *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477410 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210053.n0L0rZhR009442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Component|VLGothic-fonts |fontconfig Blocks| |446452 AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |besfahbo at redhat.com |ge.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210103.n0L130Qd003033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2009-01-20 20:02:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I built fontconfig-2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82.fc11 on the same day. That fixes > this. Not sure why that one didn't show up in rawhide instead. Because your build failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 01:17:53 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.33, 1.34 fontconfig.spec, 1.115, 1.116 sources, 1.34, 1.35 Message-ID: <20090121011753.96C477012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5572 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce - Update to 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- .cvsignore 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.33 +++ .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.34 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.115 retrieving revision 1.116 diff -u -r1.115 -r1.116 --- fontconfig.spec 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.115 +++ fontconfig.spec 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.116 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.92 -Release: 1.git.64.g167bb82%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.93 +Release: 1.git.64.g6aa4dce%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,8 +131,11 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce +- Update to 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82 -- Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g167bb82 +- Update to 2.6.92-1.git.64.g167bb82 * Mon Jan 19 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 - Update to 2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35 --- sources 19 Jan 2009 23:55:36 -0000 1.34 +++ sources 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.35 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3aef92ac30c2ed24ea89a5007ecbf588 fontconfig-2.6.92.tar.gz +f5050687560a61a87781c34fdf6a65d9 fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210149.n0L1nhuU011934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 20:49:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329524) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329524) test fix, post auto-hinting applied with fontforge Could you please check if this .ttf has 'u' fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210147.n0L1lvCT011773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 20:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Would you mean the pixel on bottom left corner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210150.n0L1o3lB020262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cody at zone38.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480878] New: fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480878 Summary: fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: michal at harddata.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Look at this: # fc-cache -v /usr/share/fonts/dejavu /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: skipping, existing cache is valid: 42 fonts, 0 dirs /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}: cleaning cache directory /root/.fontconfig: not cleaning non-existent cache directory fc-cache: succeeded As a result I have a '/var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE}/' directory, full of newly created cache files, but in /var/cache/fontconfig/ the newest file is from 2009-01-09. That with three "liberation-fonts*" packages just installed by yum. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.6.91-1.git.64.g9feaf34.fc11 How reproducible: always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210222.n0L2MYv1018822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-20 21:22:33 EDT --- I'm extremely sorry Jesse. Not sure what I've been smoking. Anyway. .93 is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210227.n0L2Rc83028783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #5 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 21:27:37 EDT --- Still broken, but in a different way. See attachment 329526. For what it's worth, the "u" is OK in version 1.03 of the font - can the hinting be copied from that version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210227.n0L2R8PS028610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cody at zone38.net) | --- Comment #4 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 21:27:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329526) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329526) Appearance of auto-hinted "u" in Liberation Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210250.n0L2oLLC024378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #6 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 21:50:20 EDT --- I have checked again. The hinting instructions and cvt are totally same between ver 1.03 and current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210251.n0L2panA001502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210300.n0L30PcU026501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:00:23 EDT --- Weird. No idea what would be causing that. I may have to play with it in FontForge some myself to see what might be causing this quirk... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 03:02:00 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts - New directory Message-ID: <20090121030200.29F5E7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts added to the repository From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 03:02:00 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel - New directory Message-ID: <20090121030200.5A5AB7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel added to the repository From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 03:02:14 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090121030214.C256B7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module cjkuni-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module cjkuni-fonts all : CVS/Root common-update @cvs update common-update : common @cd common && cvs update common : CVS/Root @cvs checkout common CVS/Root : @echo "ERROR: This does not look like a CVS checkout" && exit 1 clean : @find . -type f -name *~ -exec rm -fv {} \; From petersen at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 03:02:15 2009 From: petersen at fedoraproject.org (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1 Message-ID: <20090121030215.062877012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module cjkuni-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Makefile for source rpm: cjkuni-fonts # $Id: Makefile,v 1.1 2009/01/21 03:02:14 petersen Exp $ NAME := cjkuni-fonts SPECFILE = $(firstword $(wildcard *.spec)) define find-makefile-common for d in common ../common ../../common ; do if [ -f $$d/Makefile.common ] ; then if [ -f $$d/CVS/Root -a -w $$/Makefile.common ] ; then cd $$d ; cvs -Q update ; fi ; echo "$$d/Makefile.common" ; break ; fi ; done endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(find-makefile-common)) ifeq ($(MAKEFILE_COMMON),) # attept a checkout define checkout-makefile-common test -f CVS/Root && { cvs -Q -d $$(cat CVS/Root) checkout common && echo "common/Makefile.common" ; } || { echo "ERROR: I can't figure out how to checkout the 'common' module." ; exit -1 ; } >&2 endef MAKEFILE_COMMON := $(shell $(checkout-makefile-common)) endif include $(MAKEFILE_COMMON) --- NEW FILE sources --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210303.n0L33pYs027326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 22:03:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > ok, so this is a rename of an existing font? Yep, new package required for rename under new fonts packaging guidelines. cvs admin done Caius please import and build new package there so that Nicolas can review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210315.n0L3F56b006274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:15:04 EDT --- I have triaged on my Fedora 10 and Liberation Mono Bold looks fine (attached screenshots). Since I didn't have problem on my OpenOffice, I currently have no idea about this yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210316.n0L3GaZc006600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:16:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329532) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210320.n0L3KFwK031179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:20:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329537) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329537) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210317.n0L3HFnc030474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:17:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329535) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329535) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210319.n0L3JCms007002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #11 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:19:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329536) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329536) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210322.n0L3MsF6031991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #13 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:22:53 EDT --- It looks fine with hinting turned off on my system too; same if I set fontconfig to use auto-hinting. Only if I use bytecode hinting (which is enabled by default in Ubuntu) does it look "wrong". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 03:38:12 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090121033812.3A97B7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28457/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkuni-fonts.spec cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch import.log Log Message: renamed from cjkunifonts --- NEW FILE CIDFnmap.zh_CN --- %! % Copyright (C) 2001 Taiji Yamada and gs-cjk project % % This file is part of GNU Ghostscript. % % GNU Ghostscript is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but % WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. No author or distributor accepts responsibility % to anyone for the consequences of using it or for whether it serves any % particular purpose or works at all, unless he says so in writing. Refer % to the GNU General Public License for full details. % % Everyone is granted permission to copy, modify and redistribute GNU % Ghostscript, but only under the conditions described in the GNU General % Public License. A copy of this license is supposed to have been given % to you along with GNU Ghostscript so you can know your rights and % responsibilities. It should be in a file named COPYING. Among other % things, the copyright notice and this notice must be preserved on all % copies. % $Id: CIDFnmap.zh_CN,v 1.2 2003/05/23 04:42:46 llch Exp $ % CID fontmap for the Arphic trutype fonts % See ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/chinese-fonts-truetype/LICENSE % for license information regarding these fonts. % Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; /GBZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; --- NEW FILE CIDFnmap.zh_TW --- %! % Copyright (C) 2001 Taiji Yamada and gs-cjk project % % This file is part of GNU Ghostscript. % % GNU Ghostscript is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but % WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. No author or distributor accepts responsibility % to anyone for the consequences of using it or for whether it serves any % particular purpose or works at all, unless he says so in writing. Refer % to the GNU General Public License for full details. % % Everyone is granted permission to copy, modify and redistribute GNU % Ghostscript, but only under the conditions described in the GNU General % Public License. A copy of this license is supposed to have been given % to you along with GNU Ghostscript so you can know your rights and % responsibilities. It should be in a file named COPYING. Among other % things, the copyright notice and this notice must be preserved on all % copies. % $Id: CIDFnmap.zh_TW,v 1.1 2003/03/31 15:44:38 tagoh Exp $ % CID fontmap for the Arphic trutype fonts % See ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/chinese-fonts-truetype/LICENSE % for license information regarding these fonts. % Adobe-CNS1 /ZenKai-Medium (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) ; /ShanHeiSun-Light (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; --- NEW FILE FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN --- %! % The map is a set of records like this : % % /CIDfont_name options_dict ; % % where options_dict is a dictionary with the following entries : % % Key Type Description % Path string Absolute path to font file, or relative path to font file from % the GS_EXTFONTPATH value. % CIDFontType integer PostScript type for this CID font. Only 0 is currently allowed. % Note that this is unrelated to the real type of the font file - % the bridge will perform format conversion. % FAPI name Name of the renderer to be used with the font. /AgfaUFST and % /FreeType is now allowed -- depends on which options Ghostscript % was built with. % SubfontId integer (optional) Index of the font in font collection, such as FCO or TTC. % It is being ignored if /Path doesn't specify a collection. % CSI array Must have strongly 2 elements. % The first element of the array specifies Ordering of CIDSystemInfo. % The second element specifies Supplement of CIDSystemInfo. % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % /BousungEG-Light-GB << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /GBZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; % /MSungGBK-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-GB1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; --- NEW FILE FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW --- %! % The map is a set of records like this : % % /CIDfont_name options_dict ; % % where options_dict is a dictionary with the following entries : % % Key Type Description % Path string Absolute path to font file, or relative path to font file from % the GS_EXTFONTPATH value. % CIDFontType integer PostScript type for this CID font. Only 0 is currently allowed. % Note that this is unrelated to the real type of the font file - % the bridge will perform format conversion. % FAPI name Name of the renderer to be used with the font. /AgfaUFST and % /FreeType is now allowed -- depends on which options Ghostscript % was built with. % SubfontId integer (optional) Index of the font in font collection, such as FCO or TTC. % It is being ignored if /Path doesn't specify a collection. % CSI array Must have strongly 2 elements. % The first element of the array specifies Ordering of CIDSystemInfo. % The second element specifies Supplement of CIDSystemInfo. % % Use regular Postscript syntax. % /ZenKai-Medium << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /ShanHeiSun-Light << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; % /Adobe-CNS1 << /Path (/usr/share/fonts/chinese/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CIDFontType 0 /FAPI /FreeType /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; --- NEW FILE cidfmap.zh_CN --- /BousungEG-Light-GB << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /GBZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(GB1) 4] >> ; /MSungGBK-Light /BousungEG-Light-GB ; /Adobe-GB1 /BousungEG-Light-GB ; --- NEW FILE cidfmap.zh_TW --- /ZenKai-Medium << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai/ukai.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /ShanHeiSun-Light << /FileType /TrueType /Path (/usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming/uming.ttf) /CSI [(CNS1) 4] >> ; /Adobe-CNS1 /ShanHeiSun-Light ; --- NEW FILE cjkuni-fonts.spec --- %define fontname cjkuni %define common_desc \ CJK Unifonts are Unicode TrueType fonts derived from original fonts made \ available by Arphic Technology under "Arphic Public License" and extended by \ the CJK Unifonts project. %define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d %define umingbuilddir %{name}-uming-%{version} %define ukaibuilddir %{name}-ukai-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/CJKUnifonts Source1: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-uming/ttf-arphic-uming_%{version}.orig.tar.gz Source2: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-ukai/ttf-arphic-ukai_%{version}.orig.tar.gz Source3: FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW Source4: FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN Source5: cidfmap.zh_TW Source6: cidfmap.zh_CN Source7: CIDFnmap.zh_TW Source8: CIDFnmap.zh_CN Patch1: cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel >= 1.13, xorg-x11-font-utils, ttmkfdir %description %common_desc %package -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 Obsoletes: %{name}-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts in Ming face. %_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc # remaining uming files %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/license %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.odt %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ShanHeiSun_UMing.pdf %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/FONTLOG %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/INSTALL %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/README %doc ../%{umingbuilddir}/TODO %package -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 Obsoletes: %{name}-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts %common_desc CJK Unifonts in Kai face. %_font_pkg -n ukai -f *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf ukai.ttc # remaining ukai files %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/license %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/CONTRIBUTERS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.odt %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/Font_Comparison_ZenKai_UKai.pdf %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/FONTLOG %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/INSTALL %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/KNOWN_ISSUES %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/NEWS %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/README %doc ../%{ukaibuilddir}/TODO %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font common files. Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem >= 1.13 Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc CJK Unifonts common files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/cidfmap.zh_CN %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_TW %{gsdir}/CIDFnmap.zh_CN %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{catalogue}/%{name} %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 Obsoletes: %{name}-compat < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc CJK Unifonts compatibility files. %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf %prep %setup -q -c -T -a1 -n %{umingbuilddir} %patch1 -p1 -b .1-rhbz466667 %setup -q -c -T -a2 -n %{ukaibuilddir} %build %{nil} %install %__rm -rf %{buildroot} # *.ttc(ttf) %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} %__install -m 0644 ../%{umingbuilddir}/uming.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ %__install -m 0644 ../%{ukaibuilddir}/ukai.ttc %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/ # fonts.{scale,dir} %{_bindir}/ttmkfdir -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} \ -o %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} # *.conf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} cd ../%{umingbuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf` do %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done cd ../%{ukaibuilddir} for fconf in `ls *-ttf-arphic-ukai*.conf` do %__install -m 0644 $fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/ %__ln_s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done cd - # ghostscript %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{gsdir} %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE6} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE7} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ %__install -m 0644 %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ # catalogue %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} %__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{name} # backward compat to obsoleted ttf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType %__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf %__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-15.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Updated font renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-14.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Used _fontdir macro instead of self-definition. - Created common subpackage for common files. - Created compat subpackage for uming backward compatibility. - Refined descriptions. * Wed Jan 14 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-13.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Included _font_pkg macro to conform new font packaging guidelines. - Tidy up .spec file. * Tue Jan 06 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-12.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 (Converted to new font packaging guidelines.) * Sun Dec 7 2008 Behdad Esfahbod - 0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11 - Don't umask before fc-cache. - Add -f to fc-cache. * Wed Oct 29 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-9.2.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#466667 (Reverted to 0.2.20080216.1-4 without conf.avail.) * Tue Oct 07 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-6.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#465900 (Symlinks of fontconfig .conf files are inaccurated.) - Macro'ed all __ln_s. * Wed Oct 01 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-5.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (Unsymlinked 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.) * Tue Sep 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-4.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (All .conf files are in fonts.avail and soft linked to fonts.d.) * Mon Sep 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-3.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (repatched) * Mon Sep 29 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-2.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#459680 (qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.) * Tue Aug 05 2008 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-1.fc10 - Resolves: rhbz#457868 (Update latest release fro upstream.) * Mon Jun 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-6.fc10 - Refined obsoletes of fonts-chinese to be more ver-rel specific. * Mon Jun 30 2008 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-5.fc10 - Resolved: rhbz#453078 (fonts-chinese is deprecated and should be removed.) * Fri Aug 31 2007 Jens Petersen - remove superfluous ttfmkdir requires * Fri Aug 30 2007 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-4.fc8 - Resolved: rhbz#253813 (New package separated from fonts-chinese) -- Added requires and buildrequires ttfmkdir. * Wed Aug 30 2007 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-3.fc8 - Resolved: rhbz#253813 (New package separated from fonts-chinese) -- Fixed cidmap directory and package requirements. * Wed Aug 29 2007 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-2.fc8 - Resolved: rhbz#253813 (New package separated from fonts-chinese) -- Moved uming and ukai into sub-packages. -- Moved fc-cache from post section to install section. -- Fixed ghostscript directory and backward compatibilities symlinks. -- Refined .spec literal, license, versioning contents. * Wed Aug 22 2007 Caius Chance - 0.1.20060928-1.fc8 - Resolved: rhbz#253813 (New package separated from fonts-chinese) -- Review preparation. cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch: --- NEW FILE cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch --- diff -up cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.orig cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf --- cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf.orig 2008-10-13 12:46:43.000000000 +1000 +++ cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf 2008-10-13 12:47:28.000000000 +1000 @@ -9,21 +9,7 @@ AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE - false true false - - - - AR PL UMing CN - AR PL UMing HK - AR PL UMing TW - AR PL UMing TW MBE - - 17 - true - true - - --- NEW FILE import.log --- cjkuni-fonts-0_2_20080216_1-16_fc11:HEAD:cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-16.fc11.src.rpm:1232479883 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 03:02:14 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +ttf-arphic-ukai_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz +ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 21 Jan 2009 03:02:14 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +4d3beb55db000bfedd18c9c7d6e631d8 ttf-arphic-ukai_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz +d219fcaf953f3eb1889399955a00379f ttf-arphic-uming_0.2.20080216.1.orig.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210346.n0L3kRqG013505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #15 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:46:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329539) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329539) Screenshot of fix from attachment 329538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210344.n0L3ipah012885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #14 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:44:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329538) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329538) fixed by copying hinting from "u" in v1.03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210348.n0L3m5vD013741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #16 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:48:04 EDT --- I fixed it by using Edit -> Copy From -> TrueType Instructions to copy the "u" character from version 1.03 to 1.04. The font file itself is in attachment 329538, and a screenshot of how the fixed version appears under bytecode hinting is in attachment 329539. Feel free to adopt this patched version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210418.n0L4Ixq6019541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2009-01-20 23:18:57 EDT --- No worries, I've tagged it for Alpha. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 04:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210441.n0L4f75U023325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #44 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 23:41:06 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1070407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 05:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210519.n0L5JmpS030005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 00:19:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329544) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329544) waterfall shows R is displayed nicely -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 05:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210521.n0L5LHOX030596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #13 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 00:21:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329546) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329546) oowriter shows R is displayed nicely 6px-18px -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 07:47:23 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090121074723.268D81F8275@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 07:47:23 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: elisa Message-ID: <20090121074723.AB0FE1F8274@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> elisa has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On x86_64: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On i386: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On ppc64: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 07:47:25 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: mgopen-fonts Message-ID: <20090121074725.199F81F8274@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> mgopen-fonts has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: mgopen-fonts-common-0.20050515-11.fc11.noarch requires fontpackages-fileysystem On x86_64: mgopen-fonts-common-0.20050515-11.fc11.noarch requires fontpackages-fileysystem On i386: mgopen-fonts-common-0.20050515-11.fc11.noarch requires fontpackages-fileysystem On ppc64: mgopen-fonts-common-0.20050515-11.fc11.noarch requires fontpackages-fileysystem Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 07:47:24 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090121074724.DE49C1F8275@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210828.n0L8SUBQ026986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 03:28:29 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 10:32:54 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12 Message-ID: <20090121103254.E5F207012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem - Add provides mgopen-fonts to the -compat subpackage. Index: mgopen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- mgopen-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 10:55:22 -0000 1.11 +++ mgopen-fonts.spec 21 Jan 2009 10:32:24 -0000 1.12 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.%{upstream_date} -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 12%{?dist} Summary: Truetype greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: MgOpen @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ %package common Summary: Truetype greek fonts, common files (documentation???) Group: User Interface/X -Requires: fontpackages-fileysystem +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other MgOpen packages. @@ -49,11 +49,12 @@ %package compat -Summary: Truetype greek fonts, compatibility package +Summary: Truetype greek fonts, compatibility package Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts < 0.20050515-8 -Requires: %{fontname}-canonica-fonts, %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts, -Requires: %{fontname}-modata-fonts, %{fontname}-moderna-fonts +Provides: mgopen-fonts = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{fontname}-canonica-fonts, %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts, +Requires: %{fontname}-modata-fonts, %{fontname}-moderna-fonts %description compat %common_desc %compat_desc @@ -157,6 +158,10 @@ %files compat %changelog +* Wed Jan 21 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-12 +- Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem +- Add provides mgopen-fonts to the -compat subpackage. + * Tue Jan 20 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-11 - Fix comments from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425#c5 (thanks Nicolas Mailhot) From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Wed Jan 21 10:47:38 2009 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:47:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12 In-Reply-To: <20090121103254.E5F207012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> References: <20090121103254.E5F207012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Message-ID: Le Mer 21 janvier 2009 11:32, Sarantis Paskalis a ?crit : > > Author: sarantis > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel > In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25641 > > Modified Files: > mgopen-fonts.spec > Log Message: > - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem > - Add provides mgopen-fonts to the -compat subpackage. Please don't add that provides or you'll never be able to get rid of the compat subpackage. (or at least tell clearly to the packagers that have an mgopen-fonts dep it will go away before F11 Beta like I stated for dejavu) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 10:49:28 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec, 1.15, NONE Message-ID: <20090121104928.BA7A97012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32719 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec Log Message: tetex-font-cm-lgc renamed to ctan-cm-lgc-fonts --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to ctan-cm-lgc-fonts --- tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec DELETED --- From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 10:52:12 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel .cvsignore,1.4,NONE Message-ID: <20090121105212.DB06E7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1395 Removed Files: .cvsignore Log Message: --- .cvsignore DELETED --- From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 10:56:51 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel Makefile,1.2,NONE sources,1.5,NONE Message-ID: <20090121105651.951847012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3242 Removed Files: Makefile sources Log Message: Renamed to ctan-cm-lgc-fonts --- Makefile DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 11:13:40 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13 Message-ID: <20090121111340.8B17C7012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9209 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec Log Message: Drop provides mgopen-fonts for the -compat subpackage Index: mgopen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- mgopen-fonts.spec 21 Jan 2009 10:32:24 -0000 1.12 +++ mgopen-fonts.spec 21 Jan 2009 11:13:08 -0000 1.13 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.%{upstream_date} -Release: 12%{?dist} +Release: 13%{?dist} Summary: Truetype greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: MgOpen @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ Summary: Truetype greek fonts, compatibility package Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: mgopen-fonts < 0.20050515-8 -Provides: mgopen-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{fontname}-canonica-fonts, %{fontname}-cosmetica-fonts, Requires: %{fontname}-modata-fonts, %{fontname}-moderna-fonts %description compat @@ -158,6 +157,9 @@ %files compat %changelog +* Wed Jan 21 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-13 +- Drop provides mgopen-fonts for the -compat subpackage. + * Wed Jan 21 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-12 - Fix typo in provides: fontpackages-filesystem - Add provides mgopen-fonts to the -compat subpackage. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 12:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] New: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 Summary: Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- fontconfig-2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce.fc11.x86_64 cairo-1.8.6-1.fc11.x86_64 gstreamer-0.10.22-1.fc11.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.11-5.fc11.x86_64 $ gst-inspect-0.10 cairotextoverlay would segfault #0 IA__FcFontRenderPrepare (config=0x1544d60, pat=0x1542f00, font=0x0) at fcmatch.c:430 #1 0x00007f1172515667 in IA__FcFontMatch (config=0x1544d60, p=0x1542f00, result=0x7fff80e269ac) at fcmatch.c:578 #2 0x00007f1172c5caba in _cairo_ft_scaled_font_create_toy (toy_face=0x1542d20, font_matrix=0x15427c0, ctm=0x1542868, font_options=0x7fff80e26c20, font=0x7fff80e26a40) at cairo-ft-font.c:1694 #3 0x00007f1172c231bc in _cairo_toy_font_face_scaled_font_create (abstract_font_face=0x1542d20, font_matrix=0x15427c0, ctm=0x1542868, options=0x7fff80e26c20, scaled_font=0x7fff80e26a40) at cairo-font-face.c:625 #4 0x00007f1172c38117 in cairo_scaled_font_create (font_face=0x1542d20, font_matrix=0x15427c0, ctm=0x1542868, options=0x7fff80e26c20) at cairo-scaled-font.c:886 #5 0x00007f1172c23d05 in _cairo_gstate_ensure_scaled_font (gstate=0x1542760) at cairo-gstate.c:1489 #6 0x00007f1172c25229 in _cairo_gstate_get_font_extents (gstate=0x7, extents=0x18) at cairo-gstate.c:1507 #7 0x00007f1172c1f771 in cairo_font_extents (cr=0x1542730, extents=0x18) at cairo.c:2650 #8 0x00007f11730c096b in cairo_move_to () at cairo.c:1374 #9 0x00007f11730c1075 in cairo_move_to () at cairo.c:1374 #10 0x0000000000c5fdea in g_type_create_instance () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #11 0x0000000000c430db in ?? () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #12 0x0000000000c4375a in g_object_newv () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #13 0x0000000000c442e7 in g_object_new_valist () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #14 0x0000000000c4442c in g_object_new () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #15 0x000000000064e544 in gst_element_factory_create () from /usr/lib64/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 #16 0x00000000004050b0 in gst_element_factory_get_klass () #17 0x0000000000407275 in gst_element_factory_get_klass () #18 0x00007f11788ac5c6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #19 0x0000000000403aa9 in gst_element_factory_get_klass () This needs to be fixed ASAP, otherwise I can't compile any GStreamer application in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 12:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211243.n0LChJC9026559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-01-21 07:43:18 EDT --- Downgrading fontconfig doesn't work, so it's probably a cairo problem, although I can't test it because the soname changed recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211415.n0LEFTkD008456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Bug 477461 depends on bug 480589, which changed state. Bug 480589 Summary: Review Request: ctan-cm-lgc-fonts - CM-LGC Type1 fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480589 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211417.n0LEHpTX009377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 14:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211417.n0LEHoTu009344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-21 09:17:48 EDT --- ctan-cm-lgc-fonts built in rawhide. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pl at openoffice.org Wed Jan 21 15:50:55 2009 From: pl at openoffice.org (pl at openoffice.org) Date: 21 Jan 2009 15:50:55 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090121155055.26733.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User pl changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from pl at openoffice.org Wed Jan 21 15:50:54 +0000 2009 ------- target 3.1 then --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211609.n0LG9v7v015562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-21 11:09:56 EDT --- Whoops, broken deps. Fixed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211640.n0LGeEHN011401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-21 11:40:13 EDT --- Well, I'm not sure there is an easy way around this one. ;( Those are python compiled files that are made during build. Of course the x86_64 and i386 builds happen at slightly different times, so the generated files differ at least in timestamps. ;( Possible hacks: - Move them to the python arch directory so they are different per build. Thats kinda bad though as they are really the same files, so it would be duplication. - Set the timestamps on them from something else (the source exepthook.py?) This would be a bit misleading however. - Drop the python file entirely for now. This is bad because this file runs the exception hook for gui sessions, so users can see when they get an exception instead of it going to stderr. ;( I'm open to other ideas... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480685] fontforge multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211856.n0LIulor020680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480685 --- Comment #2 from Philippe Troin 2009-01-21 13:56:46 EDT --- Well, why are python files under /usr/share? All python packages are generally installed under /usr/lib{,64}/python. Moving these files there should fix the problem. Alternately, preserving the timestamp while copying the .py file that is the source of the py[co] should work as well. I don't see how that would be misleading... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212127.n0LLRsq5010845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:27:53 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXgfE013257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:41 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-dustismo-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 21 21:45:47 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 fontpackages.spec, 1.6, 1.7 import.log, 1.6, 1.7 sources, 1.6, 1.7 Message-ID: <20090121214547.63A407012F@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25555/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources Log Message: 1.16 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 +++ .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2 Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 +++ fontpackages.spec 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ %define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/ Name: fontpackages -Version: 1.15 +Version: 1.16 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ %changelog +* Wed Jan 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 1.16-1 + * Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.15-1 ??? lua-ize the main macro Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- import.log 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 +++ import.log 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ fontpackages-1_13-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229949018 fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787 fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014 +fontpackages-1_16-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.16-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232573931 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 -0000 1.6 +++ sources 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 @@ -1 +1 @@ -69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2 +9d449121a0762b0e08cd1fdf99c10e92 fontpackages-1.16.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212159.n0LLxWH6032170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 16:59:31 EDT --- This one is good ??? APPROVED ??? You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a If you still need sponsoring state your FAS username here and I'll approve it (however that does not mean you're of the hook for bug #476720 ; please finish packaging Beteckna) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 22:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212258.n0LMwaOb002459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 17:58:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Whoops, broken deps. Fixed: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79653 1. you really need to check your font family names in gnome-font-viewer or fontforge as explained in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy You'd see that "centuryschl" is actually "Century Schoolbook L", so the corresponding subpackage should be lilypond-century-schoolbook-l-fonts (didn't check the others, please do so) 2. your font subpackages should require %{name}-fonts-common and not %{name} so the fonts can be installed without dragging the app in 3. I doubt providing lilypond-fonts <= 2.12.1-1 is of any use; yum only needs the obsoletes for a working upgrade path, and no other package will have deps on lilypond-fonts, no? 4. The font package descriptions do not tell users a lot about the fonts, but I guess this is a minor point for you 5. There does not seem to be any obvious typo in the upgrade path rules, of course the proof is in the pudding, do test it your side (install the f10 rpm, put your new rpms in a local dir with a createrepo, point yum to it and see what happens) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481068] New: fc-cache install errors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-cache install errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Summary: fc-cache install errors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: bitmap-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446452 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: When bitmap-fonts gets installed there are a bunch of fc-cache errors appearing in rawhide. bitmap-fonts needs to be updated to the latest packaging guidelines and macros. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bitmap-fonts-0.3-6.fc10 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. spin Live Actual results: Installing: bitmap-fonts ##################### [727/950]/usr/share/fonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/VLGothic: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/abyssinica: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/bitmap-fonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/dejavu: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/jomolhari: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/kacst: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/khmeros: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lklug: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-bengali: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-gujarati: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-hindi: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-kannada: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-maithili: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-oriya: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-punjabi: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-tamil: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/mathml: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/padauk: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/paktype: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/stix: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/thaifonts-scalable: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/un-core: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW: failed to write cache /usr/share/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType: failed to write cache error: %post(bitmap-fonts-0.3-6.fc10.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 32 Expected results: Should not fail with error 32 Additional info: Actual above errors are probably due to fontconfig error, but install should not fail anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212329.n0LNTQGK020389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 18:29:25 EDT --- Some comments on http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec?revision=1.1&view=markup 1. you do not need those in the -common subpackage or the fonts subpackages. Put them in the -compat subpackage only Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 2. your Obsoletes: %{name}-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 should be changed to Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 since your package %{name} is now cjkuni-fonts (same for ukai and compat) Didn't see anything else obvious, of course testing the upgrade path yourself once the package is built is the best way to catch problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir} In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220020.n0M0Kd33018742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Jesse Keating 2009-01-21 19:20:38 EDT --- And now it's in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220040.n0M0emsw002116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:40:47 EDT --- Ankur, what is your FAS account name? You should use the same email address for bugzilla and FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:37:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220037.n0M0b0dN001403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:36:58 EDT --- According to this review Ankur needs a sponsor? and the first package can only be approved by one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220059.n0M0xfwx024949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:59:38 EDT --- I wonder if comment 7 is not due to the removal of ibm-type1 fonts from fedora? * Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 7.2-6 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify, so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641) Maybe fontforge needs to be patched to use another font, or that already fixed? (Runs for me anyway with F10 and rawhide.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 01:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220114.n0M1Eks4008076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 20:14:43 EDT --- Caius, could you do that, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From deragon at openoffice.org Thu Jan 22 01:32:40 2009 From: deragon at openoffice.org (deragon at openoffice.org) Date: 22 Jan 2009 01:32:40 -0000 Subject: [Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090122013240.27347.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 User deragon changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe|'arthit,arthur,avuton,bahe |in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli|in,benjamin_schallar,ckoli |vas,cwoollard,fedorafonts,|vas,cwoollard,deragon,fedo |haktar,hdu,hin,iorsh,jeeve|rafonts,haktar,hdu,hin,ior |sbond,jlp,kami_,manens,mas|sh,jeevesbond,jlp,kami_,ma |ayan,moyogo,munzirtaha,nus|nens,masayan,moyogo,munzir |orn,obr,ousia,rabauke,ralp|taha,nusorn,obr,ousia,raba |hie,samphan,silverex,simos|uke,ralphie,samphan,silver |,utomo99' |ex,simos,utomo99' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 02:17:09 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel cjkuni-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090122021709.D097970033@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23502 Modified Files: cjkuni-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Refined package dependencies and compat font symlinks. Index: cjkuni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel/cjkuni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- cjkuni-fonts.spec 21 Jan 2009 03:37:41 -0000 1.1 +++ cjkuni-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 02:16:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ %define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -%define umingbuilddir %{name}-uming-%{version} -%define ukaibuilddir %{name}-ukai-%{version} +%define umingbuilddir %{fontname}-uming-fonts-%{version} +%define ukaibuilddir %{fontname}-ukai-fonts-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.2.20080216.1 -Release: 16%{?dist} +Release: 17%{?dist} Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType fonts in Ming and Kai face. License: Arphic Group: User Interface/X @@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Ming face. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 -Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: %{name}-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-uming-fonts %common_desc @@ -67,10 +64,7 @@ Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font in Kai face. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 -Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: %{name}-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-ukai < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-ukai-fonts %common_desc @@ -98,7 +92,7 @@ Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: %{name}-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-common < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -121,10 +115,7 @@ Summary: Chinese Unicode TrueType font compatibility files. Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{fontname}-uming-fonts = %{version}-%{release} -Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 -Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 -Obsoletes: %{name}-compat < 0.2.20080216.1-16 +Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-compat < 0.2.20080216.1-16 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-compat %common_desc @@ -192,15 +183,24 @@ # backward compat to obsoleted ttf %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType %__install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType -%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/zysong.ttf -%__ln_s ../../%{name}/uming.ttc \ +%__ln_s %{_fontdir}/uming.ttc \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/zh_TW/TrueType/bsmi00lp.ttf %clean %__rm -fr %{buildroot} %changelog +* Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477373 +- Refined package dependencies and compat font symlinks. + +* Wed Jan 21 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-16.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#253813 +- Renamed from cjkunifonts to cjkuni-fonts according to new font packaging + guidelines. + * Mon Jan 19 2009 Caius Chance - 0.2.20080216.1-15.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477373 - Updated font renaming for post-1.13 fontpackages. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220227.n0M2RRbw008847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkunifonts |cjkuni-fonts --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 21:27:26 EDT --- changed to cjkuni-fonts because of new naming rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220235.n0M2Z5b0010335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #22 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-21 21:35:04 EDT --- hi, Its "ankursinha". I'll finish Beteckna in a few days. What do I need to do once I'm sponsored? Is it still just package and submit? regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220232.n0M2W69M022503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #34 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-21 21:32:05 EDT --- hi, It's ankursinha at fedoraproject.org. I have changed change my bugzilla login email to it. I do need a sponsor. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220248.n0M2mb3P025070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #46 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 21:48:35 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79716 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 03:27:07 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE CIDFnmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NONE FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NONE Makefile, 1.1, NONE cidfmap.zh_CN, 1.1, NONE cidfmap.zh_TW, 1.1, NONE cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch, 1.3, NONE cjkunifonts.spec, 1.32, NONE sources, 1.3, NONE Message-ID: <20090122032707.348A770033@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30246 Removed Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW Makefile cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch cjkunifonts.spec sources Log Message: resolves: rhbz# 253813 renamed to cjkuni-fonts --- CIDFnmap.zh_CN DELETED --- --- CIDFnmap.zh_TW DELETED --- --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN DELETED --- --- FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- cidfmap.zh_CN DELETED --- --- cidfmap.zh_TW DELETED --- --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-2.patch DELETED --- --- cjkunifonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 03:28:36 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cjkunifonts/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090122032836.1E17F70033@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30412 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: dead.package indicator for package rename --- NEW FILE dead.package --- renamed to cjkuni-fonts From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Jan 22 03:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:46:36 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220346.n0M3kaOu019701@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 David Baron [:dbaron] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #358120| |review?(vladimir at pobox.com) Flag| | --- Comment #55 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-21 19:46:10 PST --- Created an attachment (id=358120) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=358120) pre-patch: only define font constants in one place So I want to get the part that I've already done landed. Here's a pre-patch that fixes the problem that we have font constants defined in multiple places. I decided not to do any search-and-replace, given that there are some big patches other people have floating around. (I've adjusted the main patch to add to this file.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Jan 22 03:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:48:35 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220348.n0M3mZ5I020901@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 David Baron [:dbaron] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #338479|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #358121| |review?(vladimir at pobox.com) Flag| |, | |superreview?(bzbarsky at mit.e | |du) --- Comment #56 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-21 19:48:20 PST --- Created an attachment (id=358121) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=358121) patch for style system computation and adding stretch to gfx structures Here's the main style system patch updated, with the constructors fixed, which let me find some other places that needed to be patched. I've put some "FIXMEs" in gfx where they were obvious, but I'm sure a lot more things are needed. Requesting review from bzbarsky for the layout/* code and vlad for everything else; jdaggett is also welcome to review if he wants. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 05:49:53 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.11,1.12 Message-ID: <20090122054953.1939870033@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14230 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-16.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Refined dependencies. Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 20 Jan 2009 22:57:01 -0000 1.11 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 05:49:22 -0000 1.12 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 15%{?dist} +Release: 16%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-batang-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Batang typeface Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-batang < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-dotum-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Dotum typeface Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-dotum < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -63,7 +61,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-gulim-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Gulim typeface Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-gulim < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -77,7 +74,6 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-hline-fonts Summary: Korean Baekmuk TrueType Headline typeface Group: User Interface/X -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-6 Obsoletes: %{name}-hline < 2.2-13 Requires: %{fontname}-fonts-common = %{version}-%{release} @@ -92,6 +88,7 @@ Summary: Common files for Korean Baekmuk TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -100,10 +97,10 @@ %files -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.scale %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{catalogue}/%{fontname} -%doc COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT.ko README %{gsdir}/ %prep @@ -144,7 +141,7 @@ %__install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{gsdir}/ # catalogue -%__install -d %{buildroot}%{catalogue} +%__install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{catalogue} %__ln_s %{_fontdir} %{buildroot}%{catalogue}/%{fontname} # convert Korean copyright file to utf8 @@ -154,6 +151,10 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-16.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 +- Refined dependencies. + * Tue Jan 20 2009 Matthias Clasen - 2.2-15.fc11 - Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 06:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220632.n0M6WLOv003891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-22 01:32:20 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 07:45:04 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090122074504.AF1E01F828A@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 07:45:06 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-cm-lgc Message-ID: <20090122074506.801711B8007@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On x86_64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On i386: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts On ppc64: tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts Please resolve this as soon as possible. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220845.n0M8jHHj031471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-01-22 03:45:15 EDT --- Downgrading to something pre 2.6.9x should have worked, this is caused by 9a7c41b29f33dcd3cf7b3a422b1e46e3b88e11fe [fcmatch] Move FcFontSetMatch() functionality into FcFontSetMatchInternal() in http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/ In its previous version FcFontMatch never called FcFontRenderPrepare if there was no font available (like in mock chroot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220911.n0M9BI2B005103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220907.n0M976e7004107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #8 from Alex Lancaster 2009-01-22 04:07:05 EDT --- This should definitely be looked at ASAP as it causing broken deps in rawhide: Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 09:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220911.n0M9BGg9005071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #19 from Alex Lancaster 2009-01-22 04:11:15 EDT --- Still some problems, tetex-fong-cm-lgc is still in the rawhide report as of: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20090122/logs/depcheck Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts I suspect you need to follow the EOL procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife and request rel-eng to block the old name. Re-opening in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ceplm at openoffice.org Thu Jan 22 10:06:33 2009 From: ceplm at openoffice.org (ceplm at openoffice.org) Date: 22 Jan 2009 10:06:33 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090122100633.29321.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User ceplm changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'bahein,benjamin_schallar,|'bahein,benjamin_schallar, |bernd_schoeler,chrullrich,|bernd_schoeler,ceplm,chrul |ckolivas,cwoollard,fedoraf|lrich,ckolivas,cwoollard,f |onts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masaya|edorafonts,iorsh,jeongkyu, |n,msundman,simos' |masayan,msundman,simos' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221105.n0MB5VJc019819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221105.n0MB5Wxv019846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221452.n0MEqhZx012390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-22 09:52:42 EDT --- 1. I see. Sorry, new to fonts. 2. Ahhh. Makes sense. Should %{name}-fonts-common then be required by {%name} but not the other way round? 3. rpmlint will yell about that. 4. Not sure what I would say, honestly. 5. I'll have a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221504.n0MF4637029440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-22 10:04:05 EDT --- should the -common require the fonts and %{name} require common? I'm confused as to what it should be, exactly. yum install lilypond needs to pull in common, and then the fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 15:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221506.n0MF6Owh030254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-22 10:06:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > 1. I see. Sorry, new to fonts. np, still documenting this > 2. Ahhh. Makes sense. Should %{name}-fonts-common then be required by {%name} > but not the other way round? %{name} should require the font packages, and they will drag in common > 3. rpmlint will yell about that. rpmlint is not always right. Ask skvidal on irc if you don't believe me. Provides: oldname is only necessary if other packages depend on oldname and you don't want them to change > 4. Not sure what I would say, honestly. I know, probably need to ask on the oflb mailing list what a good description would be (or find one on wikipedia) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221704.n0MH4ocq013848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-01-22 12:04:48 EDT --- Adding this line work-around the problem for now: BuildRequires: liberation-sans-fonts fc-match crashes as well when no fonts are installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rajeeshknambiar at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 22 17:54:49 2009 From: rajeeshknambiar at fedoraproject.org (Rajeesh K Nambiar) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/smc-fonts/devel smc-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090122175449.0E73D70033@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rajeeshknambiar Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29391 Modified Files: smc-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Jan 22 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.1-4 - change descriptions - fix bug in kalyani font's obsoleting version number - move _font_pkg macros next to corresponding packages Index: smc-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- smc-fonts.spec 17 Jan 2009 05:28:18 -0000 1.4 +++ smc-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 17:54:18 -0000 1.5 @@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ # Common description %define common_desc \ -The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of\ +The SMC Fonts package contains fonts for the display of\ traditional and new Malayalam Script. Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 04.1 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 @@ -34,88 +34,89 @@ Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -Obsoletes: %{name}-dyuthi < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-dyuthi < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-dyuthi-fonts -The smc-fonts-dyuthi package contains fonts for the display of +The Dyuthi font package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n dyuthi Dyuthi*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ with exceptions -Obsoletes: %{name}-meera < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-meera < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-meera-fonts -The smc-fonts-meera package contains fonts for the display of +The Meera font package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n meera -f 90-%{fontname}-fonts.conf Meera*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2+ -Obsoletes: %{name}-rachana < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-rachana < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts -The smc-fonts-rachana package contains fonts for the display of +The Rachana font package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n rachana Rachana*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv2 -Obsoletes: %{name}-raghumalayalam < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-raghumalayalam < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-raghumalayalam-fonts -The smc-fonts-malayalam package contains fonts for the display of +The SMC Malayalam fonts package contains fonts for the display of new Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n raghumalayalam RaghuMalayalamSans*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -Obsoletes: %{name}-suruma < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-suruma < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-suruma-fonts -The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of +The Suruma font package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n suruma suruma*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04-1.3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-kalyani-fonts -The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of +The Kalyani font package contains fonts for the display of new Malayalam Scripts. +%_font_pkg -n kalyani Kalyani*.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} License: GPLv3+ with exceptions -Obsoletes: %{name}-anjalioldlipi < 04.1-3 +Obsoletes: %{name}-anjalioldlipi < 04.1-4 %description -n %{fontname}-anjalioldlipi-fonts -The smc-fonts-suruma package contains fonts for the display of +The Anjali OldLipi package contains fonts for the display of traditional Malayalam Scripts. -#%{_fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only -%_font_pkg -n dyuthi Dyuthi*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n meera -f 90-%{fontname}-fonts.conf Meera*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n rachana Rachana*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n raghumalayalam RaghuMalayalamSans*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n suruma suruma*.ttf - -%_font_pkg -n kalyani Kalyani*.ttf - %_font_pkg -n anjalioldlipi AnjaliOldLipi.ttf +#%{_fontdir} is shared by following packages since they all are for malayalam script only + %prep %setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04 @@ -144,6 +145,11 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Thu Jan 22 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.1-4 +- change descriptions +- fix bug in kalyani font's obsoleting version number +- move _font_pkg macros next to corresponding packages + * Sat Jan 17 2009 Rajeesh K Nambiar 04.1-3 - update for new font guidelines From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 17:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221755.n0MHtcZg025837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221817.n0MIHJ3K031985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #9 from Rajeesh 2009-01-22 13:17:18 EDT --- Updated the SPEC with all the changes suggested. Packages are built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221859.n0MIxSoL009613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-22 13:59:28 EDT --- Ok, how's this? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 19:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221916.n0MJGEq1029390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-22 14:16:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > hi, > > Its "ankursinha". I'll finish Beteckna in a few days. What do I need to do once > I'm sponsored? You follow the steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a for your packages that already passed review For Beteckna, you still have to pass the review step Most people on #fedora-devel will help you as long as they don't have to do the reviewing or sponsoring themselves -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435549] obsolete with ghostscript-8.62, for fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222005.n0MK5Roh008946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435549 Xose Vazquez Perez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Xose Vazquez Perez 2009-01-22 15:05:26 EDT --- nobody cared. closing.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 20:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:38:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450699] lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222038.n0MKccRT002600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:24:09 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #2 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-22 15:38:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > A. The ITRANS Tamil character "sh" in Lohit Tamil is rendered as ?? : the dot > above or pulli should be over the character rather than beside it. Most other > consonants are rendered correctly. For example, the consonant "k" is correctly > rendered as ??. I have been told that the "font must have a correct GPOS table > for pulli positioning and the rendering engine must utilise that information > when drawing the glyph" for the character to show up correctly. Of the two, I > think it more likely that it is the font rather than the rendering system that > is likely to be faulty because ?? shows up correctly. > IMHO the rendering engine is faulty. Since you use Kubuntu, I'd assume your rendering engine is whatever QT/KDE uses (probably that's just called QT?). Hence this part of the issue should be reported to them. In my case I found the same issue with Lohit Tamil with the Pango rendering engine (used in GTK+/GNOME/etc.). Downloading the source for my version of Pango and changing one of its file worked for me. The latest version of the pango file can be viewed here: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango/trunk/modules/indic/indic-ot-class-tables.c?revision=2684&view=markup In the array tamlCharClasses[], entry 55 (corresponding to unicode character 0BB6) should be changed to _ct instead of _xx for "sh," "shaa," "shi," etc. to be rendered properly. If I can get over my laziness I'll probably file a bug for this on Pango. > B. The character "shrI" should properly be rendered as ????. This character should > correctly be Unicode 0BB6 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0 whereas in Lohit Tamil (and > possibly other Tamil fonts) it is made from Unicode 0BB8 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0, > which is wrong. This should be corrected to accord with "The Unicode Standard, > Revision 5.0", p 325. I agree that Lohit Tamil should be enhanced to render 0BB6 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0 also as the "shri" ligature. However for backward-compatibility 0BB8 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0 should probably also produce the "shri" ligature -- there would certainly be older documents where this encoding was used for the "shri" ligature, and other fonts also seem to have used this encoding, e.g. all the fonts in Mandriva's fonts-ttf-tamil-1.1-2mdk package that are installed in the machine I am typing this from. But Lohit Tamil is producing the ligature for 0BB7 + 0BCD + 0BB0 + 0BC0, which doesn't seem to be useful. HTH, Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222144.n0MLiiRG017674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-22 16:44:43 EDT --- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/fonts.scale from install of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-16.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts-2.2-13.fc11.noarch Your -common subpackage needs to obsolete baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222158.n0MLwubr020971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-22 16:58:55 EDT --- 1. You probably want to drop Provides: lilypond-fonts <= 2.12.1-1 it's going to do weird stuff at best 2. you don't need a %doc in common if you don't put any doc files in here (it would have been great if one of the txt files of lilipond explained the origin and licensing of the fonts But that's minor; you package works fine now IMHO. Thank you for taking the time to do it right! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Jan 22 23:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:16:24 -0800 Subject: [Bug 331716] 'fi' and 'fl' ligatures overlap following glyph with justified text in pango builds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222316.n0MNGOF6009150@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331716 Nobody; OK to take it and work on it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Core |Core Graveyard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222339.n0MNdqK1010629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446452 |446451 Summary|fc-cache install errors |bitmap-fonts needs updating | |to revised packaging | |guidelines --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-22 18:39:51 EDT --- Fontconfig got fixed but the package still needs updating to the new macros I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Jan 23 00:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:00:05 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230000.n0N0052L015974@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #358120|review?(vladimir at pobox.com) |review+ Flag| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Jan 23 00:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:01:01 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230001.n0N011jF017430@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #358121|review?(vladimir at pobox.com) |review+ Flag| | --- Comment #57 from Vladimir Vukicevic (:vlad) 2009-01-22 12:57:41 PST --- (From update of attachment 358121) Looks fine to me, though maybe add in something grep-able into the comments for the obsolete constants, so that we can periodically do a grep across the tree and fix as needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 07:40:06 2009 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis Message-ID: <20090123074006.66B1F1F82A0@releng2.fedora.phx.redhat.com> tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On ppc64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 Please resolve this as soon as possible. From hdu at openoffice.org Fri Jan 23 07:43:40 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 23 Jan 2009 07:43:40 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090123074340.12040.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|STARTED |RESOLVED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |FIXED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Fri Jan 23 07:43:40 +0000 2009 ------- Got into CWS vcl99. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 10:35:50 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1 Message-ID: <20090123103550.9F5EA700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30190 Added Files: dead.package Log Message: Renamed to ctan-kerkis-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to ctan-kerkis-fonts From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 10:37:22 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, NONE Makefile, 1.2, NONE sources, 1.3, NONE tetex-font-kerkis.spec, 1.19, NONE Message-ID: <20090123103722.9D70E179D1E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30477 Removed Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources tetex-font-kerkis.spec Log Message: Renamed to ctan-kerkis-fonts --- .cvsignore DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- --- tetex-font-kerkis.spec DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481279] New: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Attempting yum update of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common fails sating conflict against baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2.13 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.2.15 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum update 2. 3. Actual results: Reports conflict eror described above Expected results: Successful update Additional info: in the %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common section of the .spec file, should there be an obsoletes %{fontname}-common-fonts < 2.2.13(or is it 2.2.14 - common-fonts was last in version 2.2.13). I also noticed that when I had 2.2.13 installed, there was a baekmuk-fonts-common version 2.2.10 still installed, and presumably that should have been obsoleted by a previous update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231214.n0NCEJjO030526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state. Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231214.n0NCEH2u030488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #20 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-23 07:14:16 EDT --- Ah, sorry forgot that one from the EOL procedure. Blocked from dist-f11 in koji (https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1243). Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 13:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231359.n0NDx6Vm022577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-23 08:59:05 EDT --- Needs freefont to be renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231422.n0NEMMj9028666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #24 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-23 09:22:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bonvenocf-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231423.n0NENrDp013534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-23 09:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oldstandard-sfd-fonts Short Description: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 14:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231456.n0NEu91Z020685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-23 09:56:08 EDT --- Please be more careful, infra will create a component with the exact name you give in your cvs request, and your srpm will have to be named the same way of this component. Please adjust your demand to the final agreed-on name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 16:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231616.n0NGGvsu006339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-23 11:16:56 EDT --- Hi, I'm the moodle maintainer, and I need khmeros-fonts to comply before I can bring moodle into compliance so I thought I'd offer suggestions or assistance. I could: 1. Offer my observations on what needs to be done. 2. Provide a patched spec. 3. Change, commit and build the thing myself (after your review if you like, or course), as I'm a provenpackager member. 4. Butt out. :) Any of these sound appealing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231720.n0NHKm8C021344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha 2009-01-23 12:20:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cf-bonveno-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231733.n0NHXkNV008072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state. Bug 477416 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231733.n0NHXjYL008047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-23 12:33:44 EDT --- Cool. Fixed in rawhide, added to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450699] lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231742.n0NHgUDO025585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 --- Comment #3 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-23 12:42:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > In my case I found the same issue with Lohit Tamil with the Pango rendering > engine (used in GTK+/GNOME/etc.). Downloading the source for my version of > Pango and changing one of its file worked for me. > > The latest version of the pango file can be viewed here: > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango/trunk/modules/indic/indic-ot-class-tables.c?revision=2684&view=markup > In the array tamlCharClasses[], entry 55 (corresponding to unicode character > 0BB6) should be changed to _ct instead of _xx for "sh," "shaa," "shi," etc. to > be rendered properly. > > If I can get over my laziness I'll probably file a bug for this on Pango. I found that there is already a bug for this in Pango: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481203 This was also tracked here in bug 218905 which has since been closed for being filed against an old rawhide version. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=127113 shows the rendering with the fix in Pango (with no fix required in Lohit Tamil for this particular issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231913.n0NJDeQE030255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-23 14:13:38 EDT --- Bastien, cairo .soname changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 19:21:55 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.34, 1.35 fontconfig.spec, 1.116, 1.117 sources, 1.35, 1.36 Message-ID: <20090123192155.2E7C9700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16180 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Fri Jan 23 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 - Update to 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35 --- .cvsignore 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.34 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.35 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.94.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.116 retrieving revision 1.117 diff -u -r1.116 -r1.117 --- fontconfig.spec 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.116 +++ fontconfig.spec 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.117 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.93 -Release: 1.git.64.g6aa4dce%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.94 +Release: 1.git.65.g628ee83%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Fri Jan 23 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 +- Update to 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 + * Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce - Update to 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.35 retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36 --- sources 21 Jan 2009 01:17:23 -0000 1.35 +++ sources 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.36 @@ -1 +1 @@ -f5050687560a61a87781c34fdf6a65d9 fontconfig-2.6.93.tar.gz +ba79ff72570a91698fb2f76ef255e5e4 fontconfig-2.6.94.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480928] Fontconfig makes GStreamer plugin crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231932.n0NJW2tu018513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480928 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-23 14:32:01 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Fri Jan 23 20:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:23:32 -0800 Subject: [Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901232023.n0NKNWBh031239@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |410678 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 20:59:17 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-10 NOTICE, NONE, 1.1 README.txt, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090123205917.3DF1F700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32353/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: NOTICE README.txt google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE NOTICE --- Copyright (c) 2005-2008, The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION 1. Definitions. "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License. "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License. "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files. "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types. "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work (an example is provided in the Appendix below). "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof. "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and subsequently incorporated within the Work. 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License. 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions. 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor has been advised of the possibility of such damages. 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS --- NEW FILE README.txt --- Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. ########## This directory contains the fonts for the platform. They are licensed under the Apache 2 license. --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Droid Sans Droid Sans sans-serif Droid Sans Fallback Droid Sans --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Droid Sans Mono Droid Sans Mono monospace --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf --- serif Droid Serif Droid Serif serif --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts.spec --- %define fontname google-droid %define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts %define common_desc \ The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender's \ Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \ for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \ on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for \ other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X License: ASL 2.0 URL: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts Source1: %{download_root}/DroidSans.ttf Source2: %{download_root}/DroidSans-Bold.ttf Source3: %{download_root}/DroidSansFallback.ttf Source4: %{download_root}/DroidSansMono.ttf Source5: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Source6: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Bold.ttf Source7: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Italic.ttf Source8: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf Source9: %{download_root}/NOTICE Source10: %{download_root}/README.txt Source11: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source12: %{name}-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf Source13: %{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files of the Droid font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: A humanist sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans is a humanist sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans -f ??-%{fontname}-sans.conf DroidSans.ttf DroidSans-Bold.ttf DroidSansFallback.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: A humanist monospace sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans Mono is a humanist monospace sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans-mono -f ??-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DroidSansMono.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: A serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc Droid Serif is a contemporary serif typeface family designed for comfortable reading on screen. Droid Serif is slightly condensed to maximize the amount of text displayed on small screens. Vertical stress and open forms contribute to its readability while its proportion and overall design complement its companion Droid Sans. %_font_pkg -n serif -f ??-%{fontname}-serif.conf DroidSerif*ttf %prep %setup -q -c -T install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} notice.txt install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} readme.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} %{SOURCE4} %{SOURCE5} \ %{SOURCE6} %{SOURCE7} %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/65-%{fontname}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/60-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/59-%{fontname}-serif.conf for fontconf in 59-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-serif.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Fri Jan 16 2009 - 1.0.112-3 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug - 1.0.112-2 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check) * Tue Dec 9 2008 - 1.0.112-1 ?? Licensing bit clarified in bug #472635 ?? Fedora submission * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 1.0.107-1 ?? Initial built using ???fontpackages??? --- NEW FILE import.log --- google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:F-10:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232744231 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jan 2009 20:58:46 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +DroidSans-Bold.ttf +DroidSans.ttf +DroidSansFallback.ttf +DroidSansMono.ttf +DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jan 2009 20:58:46 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +2afdf28d5cdd079b41968cdabf1b469e DroidSans-Bold.ttf +6f28ad369fa0f2661cc2de7a7be9977e DroidSans.ttf +4caeadd734f4be9973163bdf02ea6cf5 DroidSansFallback.ttf +3922dfe38a36da7d6edfb1fe77b276fb DroidSansMono.ttf +849a92990a80cbb665bfc74fd03743bd DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +a062025df92affc1331a05b7c07793fc DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +a2e7305a0ba8bb7091124f4cd1485fc9 DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +bfb2f44a7c1deba39f7f4d39bff18eeb DroidSerif-Regular.ttf From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 23 20:59:19 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-9 NOTICE, NONE, 1.1 README.txt, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 google-droid-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090123205919.3FB5C700FE@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32377/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: NOTICE README.txt google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE NOTICE --- Copyright (c) 2005-2008, The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION 1. Definitions. "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License. "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License. "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files. "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types. "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work (an example is provided in the Appendix below). "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof. "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and subsequently incorporated within the Work. 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License. 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License, without any additional terms or conditions. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed with Licensor regarding such Contributions. 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor has been advised of the possibility of such damages. 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS --- NEW FILE README.txt --- Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. ########## This directory contains the fonts for the platform. They are licensed under the Apache 2 license. --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Droid Sans Droid Sans sans-serif Droid Sans Fallback Droid Sans --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf --- monospace Droid Sans Mono Droid Sans Mono monospace --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts-serif-fontconfig.conf --- serif Droid Serif Droid Serif serif --- NEW FILE google-droid-fonts.spec --- %define fontname google-droid %define download_root http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=blob_plain;f=data/fonts %define common_desc \ The Droid typeface family was designed in the fall of 2006 by Ascender's \ Steve Matteson, as a commission from Google to create a set of system fonts \ for its Android platform. The goal was to provide optimal quality and comfort \ on a mobile handset when rendered in application menus, web browsers and for \ other screen text. Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X License: ASL 2.0 URL: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/frameworks/base.git;a=tree;f=data/fonts Source1: %{download_root}/DroidSans.ttf Source2: %{download_root}/DroidSans-Bold.ttf Source3: %{download_root}/DroidSansFallback.ttf Source4: %{download_root}/DroidSansMono.ttf Source5: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Source6: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Bold.ttf Source7: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-Italic.ttf Source8: %{download_root}/DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf Source9: %{download_root}/NOTICE Source10: %{download_root}/README.txt Source11: %{name}-sans-fontconfig.conf Source12: %{name}-sans-mono-fontconfig.conf Source13: %{name}-serif-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files of the Droid font set Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts Summary: A humanist sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans is a humanist sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans -f ??-%{fontname}-sans.conf DroidSans.ttf DroidSans-Bold.ttf DroidSansFallback.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts Summary: A humanist monospace sans serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %common_desc Droid Sans Mono is a humanist monospace sans serif typeface designed for user interfaces and electronic communication. %_font_pkg -n sans-mono -f ??-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DroidSansMono.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts Summary: A serif typeface Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts %common_desc Droid Serif is a contemporary serif typeface family designed for comfortable reading on screen. Droid Serif is slightly condensed to maximize the amount of text displayed on small screens. Vertical stress and open forms contribute to its readability while its proportion and overall design complement its companion Droid Sans. %_font_pkg -n serif -f ??-%{fontname}-serif.conf DroidSerif*ttf %prep %setup -q -c -T install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE9} notice.txt install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE10} readme.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} %{SOURCE4} %{SOURCE5} \ %{SOURCE6} %{SOURCE7} %{SOURCE8} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE11} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/65-%{fontname}-sans.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE12} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/60-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/59-%{fontname}-serif.conf for fontconf in 59-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-serif.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf done %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Fri Jan 16 2009 - 1.0.112-3 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug - 1.0.112-2 ??? Convert to new naming guidelines ??? Do strange stuff with Sans Fallback (CJK users please check) * Tue Dec 9 2008 - 1.0.112-1 ?? Licensing bit clarified in bug #472635 ?? Fedora submission * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 1.0.107-1 ?? Initial built using ???fontpackages??? --- NEW FILE import.log --- google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:F-9:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232744230 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 23 Jan 2009 20:58:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +DroidSans-Bold.ttf +DroidSans.ttf +DroidSansFallback.ttf +DroidSansMono.ttf +DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +DroidSerif-Regular.ttf Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 20:27:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 23 Jan 2009 20:58:48 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +2afdf28d5cdd079b41968cdabf1b469e DroidSans-Bold.ttf +6f28ad369fa0f2661cc2de7a7be9977e DroidSans.ttf +4caeadd734f4be9973163bdf02ea6cf5 DroidSansFallback.ttf +3922dfe38a36da7d6edfb1fe77b276fb DroidSansMono.ttf +849a92990a80cbb665bfc74fd03743bd DroidSerif-Bold.ttf +a062025df92affc1331a05b7c07793fc DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf +a2e7305a0ba8bb7091124f4cd1485fc9 DroidSerif-Italic.ttf +bfb2f44a7c1deba39f7f4d39bff18eeb DroidSerif-Regular.ttf From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240239.n0O2duVB010920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:39:56 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477440] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240239.n0O2dxNP010944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 10:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241057.n0OAvOIf016938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241140.n0OBer2b012496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sshedmak at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 06:40:52 EDT --- 1. you have two fonts in there, Pothana2000 and Vemana2000. Our guidelines call for their packaging in different packages or subpackages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts 2. now since they do not share the same version, this will difficult for you, unless you use a timestamp as version 3. you were quite right to remove the non-free .exe from the source, but that will stop our automatic 'did upstream release a new version' script checks from working 4. even though the PDF manual contains mostly unrelated windows info, it does contain the copyright notice so you should include it in %doc too 5. while we do accept pure GPL fonts in Fedora, the GPL has problems WRT embedding fonts in other documents (common for PDFs) so we much prefer if upstream added the FSF font exception to its licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#embedding ? none of those are blockers, but it would simplify your life considerably if you could convince upstream to publish each font in a separate versionned archive, with no .exe inside, and with the font exception added to its licensing Please consider asking those changes of upstream before continuing 6. since upstream release two fonts (or more?) please consider adding a foundry prefix to your package names 7. Please make sure you've completed all the steps (as requester and packager of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle up to and including 2.a) 8. This part is too much. Including the author name in the description is sufficient: ------ Author ------ "Dr. Tirumala Krishna Desikachary" 9. Please wrap your description at 79column, not 46 10. 49 is much too low a fontconfig priority level. Please respect the numbering ranges documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families 11. Never process files in %install. If you need to fix up upstream txt files, do so in %prep 12. Please do not change the fontconfig symlinking pattern documented in our templates, you'll introduce bugs. If you've properly implemented the previous steps it should just work. You have many examples of simple spec files in the gfs fonts ? NEEDINFO till this is being taken care of -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241145.n0OBj2JA013267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241146.n0OBkg0J013600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmCk9026473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmp5t026616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmP8i026536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241147.n0OBl6t1026333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: RiordonFancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241146.n0OBkwhl013701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241147.n0OBlpV1013819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:28:15 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:28:15 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124122815.E86F5208482@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:28:30 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:28:30 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124122830.C57FD208481@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora 9 is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:28:46 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:28:46 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] abyssinica-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124122846.B223F208481@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package abyssinica-fonts in Fedora 10 is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/abyssinica-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:31:39 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:31:39 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] nafees-web-naskh-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124123139.A095E20847F@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package nafees-web-naskh-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nafees-web-naskh-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:31:46 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:31:46 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] nafees-web-naskh-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124123146.BFC1F208487@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package nafees-web-naskh-fonts in Fedora 9 is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nafees-web-naskh-fonts From pkgdb at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:31:53 2009 From: pkgdb at fedoraproject.org (Fedora PackageDB) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:31:53 +0000 Subject: [pkgdb] nafees-web-naskh-fonts ownership updated Message-ID: <20090124123153.A911320847F@bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Package nafees-web-naskh-fonts in Fedora 10 is now owned by bochecha To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nafees-web-naskh-fonts From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 24 12:37:42 2009 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 khmeros-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090124123742.ABC427010A@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25925/devel Modified Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: changes to comply with F11 font rules Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 11 Jul 2008 08:23:07 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 24 Jan 2009 12:37:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764336 +khmeros-fonts-5_0-4_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-4.fc10.src.rpm:1232800449 Index: khmeros-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/khmeros-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- khmeros-fonts.spec 11 Jul 2008 08:23:07 -0000 1.1 +++ khmeros-fonts.spec 24 Jan 2009 12:37:12 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,107 +1,131 @@ -%define fontname khmeros -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} +%define fontname khmeros +#%%define fontconf -%{fontname} + +%define archivename All_KhmerOS_%{version} + +%define common_desc \ +The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent \ +sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not \ +necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. \ +\ +They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. + Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X License: LGPLv2+ URL: http://www.khmeros.info/drupal/?q=en/download/fonts Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/khmer/%{archivename}.zip +#Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have equivalent -sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix both it is not -necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each language. +%common_desc -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. -%package base -Summary: Base Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description base -The Khmer OS fonts include base Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +#%package common +#Summary: Common files of %{name} +#Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: fontpackages-filesystem +# +#%description common +#%common_desc +# +#This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. -%package battambang -Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description battambang -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +%package -n %{fontname}-base-fonts +Summary: Base KhmerOS font +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +#Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-base <= %{version}-3 +#Provides: khmeros-fonts-base-%{version}-%{release} -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +%description -n %{fontname}-base-fonts +%common_desc -%package bokor -Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description bokor -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +Base KhmerOS fonts. -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +%_font_pkg -n base KhmerOS.ttf KhmerOS_content.ttf KhmerOS_sys.ttf +%package -n %{fontname}-battambang-fonts +Summary: Battambang font +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%package handwritten -Summary: Handwritten Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description handwritten -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +%description -n %{fontname}-battambang-fonts +%common_desc -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +Battambang font. +%_font_pkg -n battambang KhmerOS_battambang.ttf -%package metalchrieng -Summary: Old-fashioned Khmer font set by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description metalchrieng -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +%package -n %{fontname}-bokor-fonts +Summary: Bokor font +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +%description -n %{fontname}-bokor-fonts +%common_desc +Bokor font. -%package muol -Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description muol -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +%_font_pkg -n bokor KhmerOS_bokor.ttf -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +%package -n %{fontname}-handwritten-fonts +Summary: Freehand and fasthand fonts +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +%description -n %{fontname}-handwritten-fonts +%common_desc -%package siemreap -Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute -Group: User Interface/X -%description siemreap -The Khmer OS fonts include Khmer and Latin alphabets, and they have -equivalent sizes for Khmer and English alphabets, so that when texts mix -both it is not necessary to have different point sizes for the text in each -language. +Freehand and fasthand - handwritten fonts. -They were created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute. +%_font_pkg -n handwritten KhmerOS_freehand.ttf KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-metal-chrieng-fonts +Summary: Metal Chrieng font +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-metal-chrieng-fonts +%common_desc + +Metal Chrieng font. + +%_font_pkg -n metal-chrieng KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-muol-fonts +Summary: Muol fonts - normal, light and Pali +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-muol-fonts +%common_desc + +Muol fonts - normal, light and Pali. + +%_font_pkg -n muol KhmerOS_muol.ttf KhmerOS_muollight.ttf KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf + +%package -n %{fontname}-siemreap-fonts +Summary: Siemreap font +Group: User Interface/X +#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-siemreap-fonts +%common_desc + +Siemreap font. + +%_font_pkg -n siemreap KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf %prep @@ -114,125 +138,40 @@ %install rm -rf %{buildroot} -# One of the fonts is named 'KhmerOS .ttf' (note the space). -# 1) It is apparently a mistake. -# 2) Have problems with installing it inside %%files base -rename ' ' '' * +# get rid of the white space (' ') +mv 'KhmerOS .ttf' KhmerOS.ttf -install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{fontdir} -install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} + +#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ +# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} + +# Repeat for every font family +#install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCEX} \ +# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-.conf + +#for fconf in %{fontconf}-.conf \ +# %{fontconf}-.conf \ +# %{fontconf}-.conf ; do +# ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ +# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf +#done %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} -%post base -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post battambang -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post bokor -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post handwritten -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post metalchrieng -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post muol -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%post siemreap -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun base -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun battambang -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun bokor -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun handwritten -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun metalchrieng -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun muol -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun siemreap -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi - - -%files base -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS.ttf -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_sys.ttf -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_content.ttf - -%files battambang -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_battambang.ttf - -%files bokor -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_bokor.ttf - -%files handwritten -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_fasthand.ttf -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_freehand.ttf - -%files metalchrieng -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_metalchrieng.ttf - -%files muol -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muol.ttf -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muolpali.ttf -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_muollight.ttf - -%files siemreap -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/KhmerOS_siemreap.ttf +#%files common +#%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +#%dir %{_fontdir} + %changelog +* Fri Jan 23 2009 Michal Nowak - 5.0-4 +- changes to comply with F11 font rules + * Tue Jul 8 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-3 - reshaping to multiple subpackages based on font type/purpose - license uncertainity is solved; licence field is set according @@ -243,5 +182,5 @@ - refactoring summary and description texts (Nicolas Mailhot) * Fri Jul 4 2008 Michal Nowak - 5.0-1 -- Initial release +- initial release From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 12:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 07:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241244.n0OCiNpW004552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-24 07:44:22 EDT --- Hi Jon, thanks for interest in khmeros-fonts pkg! Please see my today's cvs commit to khmeros-fonts target. I pulled there what I guess is something near to F-11 compliance. But there are still some issues: - Obsoletes/Provides are not finished. In the 'base' pkg you can see my proposal, which is somewhat bogus :). I believe there's on Fedora wiki some guide on O/P labels but I failed to find it. - The -commons sub-package seems to be useless, nothing but *.ttf's are shipped. - Fontconfig support is missing, but not a hard requirement. Eventually, you'll find other problems - please, share them, then we'll what can be done :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sat Jan 24 14:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:50:42 -0800 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241450.n0OEogOi020166@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Gabriele Best changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |475164 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 15:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241531.n0OFVufp021773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-24 10:31:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Very nice to see someone else reviewing font packages :p > > Please do not forget the other steps in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a > > now I already did most of those. The only thing remaining is comps and I was going to ask you about it. Do I need to put this application-specific on comps? I am not planning to put the application itself on comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241601.n0OG142a006918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 11:01:03 EDT --- I can't comment on the application, but as for the fonts, yes please do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241615.n0OGFnUN028588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481423 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477440, which changed state. Bug 477440 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477440 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 16:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481423] New: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 Summary: [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: java-1.6.0-openjdk AssignedTo: langel at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dbhole at redhat.com, mark at klomp.org, langel at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, lkundrak at v3.sk Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora A huge font repackaging operation is ongoing in Rawhide. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Repackaging_of_Fedora_fonts IIRC java is still not 100% fontconfig-ified and depends on font files location. Please check before each Alpha/Beta/Test releases the distro font changes have not broken something openjdk-side -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] New: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: sergei at regolit.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=329915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329915) The difference before old and new glyph. Description of problem: Symbol U+0431 (russian letter ???) looks bad since revision 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. In that revision glyph's shape was altered but hint instructions were not. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Render string containing symbol "?" with antialiasing turned on and compare with revision before 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. Actual results: Expected results: Normal shape is expected. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241927.n0OJRpVh008153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Stolyarov 2009-01-24 14:27:50 EDT --- The font is Libertion Sans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 20:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481279] Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242054.n0OKs41B023003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Beland 2009-01-24 15:54:03 EDT --- This is apparently part of the packaging changes requested at bug 477332. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481279] Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242118.n0OLINfa027516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 16:18:22 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477332 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242118.n0OLIPnH027560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quentin at armitage.org.uk --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 16:18:23 EDT --- *** Bug 481279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242155.n0OLtSuQ021129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state. Bug 477416 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242155.n0OLtRvO021102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-24 16:55:26 EDT --- Thanks for your work but, sorry, this is not done yet. The guidelines state that the Type1 fonts need to be packaged separately. I already send an email to you (I wasn't aware of the presence of this bug), asking to split those .pfb fonts into yet another subpackage. For instance, this is done for the musixtex (ref: bug #481071 and bug #481070 ). If you'd ask me how I ended up here: I wanted to package the guitar tablature editor "ktabedit" and ktabedit needs those .pfb files. And it won't be appropriate to make ktabedit require lilypond just for this reason. Can you please add subpackage(s) for each families of those Type1 .pfb fonts? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242218.n0OMImkt025469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242218.n0OMIm9G025445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 17:18:47 EDT --- Some more QA: The moderna fontconfig file has several problems: 1. it references Modata and not Moderna 2. it declares an Mgopen font as a valid Helvetica substitute. Unfortunately Helvetica is used by default in many CSS rules, and the mgopen fonts do not really have enough unicode coverage to provide a satisfactory replacement for worldwide browsing. Thus I'd advise using a fontconfig file modelled after basic-font-template.* only for Moderna (the decision can of course be revisited later if someone picks up Moderna and starts improving its coverage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 01:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901250150.n0P1oM8t030331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-24 20:50:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 11:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251108.n0PB80o5000538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 06:07:59 EDT --- Sorry about that, I wanted to minimize your work by not adhering rigidly to splitting for pfb files and it only made more work for yo :( Please make sure however the pfb and otf files can be installed independently in different subpackages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_the_same_font_in_several_different_formats.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 11:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251113.n0PBDtDA014047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 06:13:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - Obsoletes/Provides are not finished. In the 'base' pkg you can see my > proposal, which is somewhat bogus :). I believe there's on Fedora wiki some > guide on O/P labels but I failed to find it. Provides for the old font names are probably unecessary If each new font subpackage corresponds exactly to one or several old (sub)packages, you only need to Orsolete: oldpackagename < thisversion-thisrelease If the mapping is less obvious look at the compat packages in dejavu for example > - The -commons sub-package seems to be useless, nothing but *.ttf's are > shipped. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What.27s_the_point_of_the_common_subpackage.3F > - Fontconfig support is missing, but not a hard requirement. It's not but it help browsers at least. Upstream should be able to give you the information needed to fill them in (to what CSS category each font belongs, etc) > Eventually, you'll find other problems - please, share them, then we'll what > can be done :). Don't hesitate to ping me on irc or on the fonts list if you have specific problems. I'll probably eventually review the changes in this package as I did with others, but I have a long review queue nowadays. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 11:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251117.n0PBHkTJ014904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 06:17:45 EDT --- Please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 12:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251240.n0PCeTG0017440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 12:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251240.n0PCeS3s017411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 12:46:21 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/edrip-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.4, NONE edrip-fonts-license.patch, 1.1, NONE edrip-fonts.spec, 1.13, NONE Message-ID: <20090125124622.441F870133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14727 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf edrip-fonts-license.patch edrip-fonts.spec Log Message: renamed to apanov-edrip-fonts --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to apanov-edrip-fonts (#481472) --- edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- --- edrip-fonts-license.patch DELETED --- --- edrip-fonts.spec DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251347.n0PDlI83011427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 08:47:17 EDT --- See also the FAQ, starting from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#Do_I_need_to_Obsolete_my_old_package_names.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251351.n0PDp7oj012309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251357.n0PDvFN0013591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 13:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_sil-charis-fonts?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ? sil-charis-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ? sil-charis-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 181993 Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora Renaming of charis-fonts to sil-charis-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-fonts-4.104-5.fc11.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1248 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 14:03:23 2009 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel import.log, 1.2, 1.3 khmeros-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090125140323.6925470133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29635/devel Modified Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: provide Obsoletes and dependency on -common pkg Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 24 Jan 2009 12:37:12 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 25 Jan 2009 14:02:52 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764336 khmeros-fonts-5_0-4_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-4.fc10.src.rpm:1232800449 +khmeros-fonts-5_0-4_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-4.fc10.src.rpm:1232892078 Index: khmeros-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/khmeros-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- khmeros-fonts.spec 24 Jan 2009 12:37:12 -0000 1.2 +++ khmeros-fonts.spec 25 Jan 2009 14:02:52 -0000 1.3 @@ -30,23 +30,22 @@ %common_desc -#%package common -#Summary: Common files of %{name} -#Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: fontpackages-filesystem -# -#%description common -#%common_desc -# -#This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. +%package common +Summary: Common files of %{name} +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem + +%description common +%common_desc + +This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-base-fonts Summary: Base KhmerOS font Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -#Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-base <= %{version}-3 -#Provides: khmeros-fonts-base-%{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-base < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-base-fonts %common_desc @@ -58,7 +57,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-battambang-fonts Summary: Battambang font Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-battambang < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-battambang-fonts %common_desc @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-bokor-fonts Summary: Bokor font Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-bokor < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-bokor-fonts %common_desc @@ -82,7 +83,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-handwritten-fonts Summary: Freehand and fasthand fonts Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-handwritten < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-handwritten-fonts %common_desc @@ -94,7 +96,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-metal-chrieng-fonts Summary: Metal Chrieng font Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-metalchrieng < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-metal-chrieng-fonts %common_desc @@ -106,7 +109,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-muol-fonts Summary: Muol fonts - normal, light and Pali Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-muol < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-muol-fonts %common_desc @@ -118,7 +122,8 @@ %package -n %{fontname}-siemreap-fonts Summary: Siemreap font Group: User Interface/X -#Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: khmeros-fonts-siemreap < 5.0-4 %description -n %{fontname}-siemreap-fonts %common_desc @@ -163,9 +168,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} -#%files common -#%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -#%dir %{_fontdir} +%files common +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251404.n0PE4otN015341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251404.n0PE4nsQ015306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_sil-andika-fonts?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ? sil-andika-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ? sil-andika-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 452663 Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora Renaming of andika-fonts to sil-andika-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-andika-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1249 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 14:11:43 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/andika-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.2, NONE andika-fonts.spec, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20090125141144.0598A70133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31954 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf andika-fonts.spec Log Message: renamed to sil-andika-fonts --- NEW FILE dead.package --- renamed to sil-andika-fonts --- andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- --- andika-fonts.spec DELETED --- From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 14:13:13 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/charis-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, 1.4, NONE charis-fonts.spec, 1.11, NONE Message-ID: <20090125141313.0284670133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32325 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf charis-fonts.spec Log Message: renamed to sil-charis-fonts --- NEW FILE dead.package --- renamed to sil-charis-fonts --- charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf DELETED --- --- charis-fonts.spec DELETED --- From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 14:15:24 2009 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel import.log, 1.3, 1.4 khmeros-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090125141524.348A270133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32502/devel Modified Files: import.log khmeros-fonts.spec Log Message: provide Obsoletes and require -common pkg Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- import.log 25 Jan 2009 14:02:52 -0000 1.3 +++ import.log 25 Jan 2009 14:14:53 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ khmeros-fonts-5_0-3_fc9:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm:1215764336 khmeros-fonts-5_0-4_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-4.fc10.src.rpm:1232800449 khmeros-fonts-5_0-4_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-4.fc10.src.rpm:1232892078 +khmeros-fonts-5_0-5_fc10:HEAD:khmeros-fonts-5.0-5.fc10.src.rpm:1232892707 Index: khmeros-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/khmeros-fonts/devel/khmeros-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- khmeros-fonts.spec 25 Jan 2009 14:02:52 -0000 1.3 +++ khmeros-fonts.spec 25 Jan 2009 14:14:53 -0000 1.4 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 5.0 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Khmer font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute Group: User Interface/X @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ %changelog +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Michal Nowak - 5.0-5 +- provide Obsoletes and dependency on -common pkg + * Fri Jan 23 2009 Michal Nowak - 5.0-4 - changes to comply with F11 font rules From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 14:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251418.n0PEIJfP005278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-25 09:18:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Provides for the old font names are probably unecessary rpmlint complains but thanks to the FAQ I understand it more clearly. (In reply to comment #6) > Orsolete: oldpackagename < thisversion-thisrelease Done. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What.27s_the_point_of_the_common_subpackage.3F :). Thanks. > Don't hesitate to ping me on irc or on the fonts list if you have specific > problems. I'll probably eventually review the changes in this package as I did > with others, but I have a long review queue nowadays. Thanks again Nicolas. -- Jon, if you have time, have a look into the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From sarantis at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 25 14:53:54 2009 From: sarantis at fedoraproject.org (Sarantis Paskalis) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel mgopen-fonts.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090125145354.54DA970133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: sarantis Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7788 Modified Files: mgopen-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Fix fontconfig file for moderna. Index: mgopen-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/mgopen-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- mgopen-fonts.spec 21 Jan 2009 11:13:08 -0000 1.13 +++ mgopen-fonts.spec 25 Jan 2009 14:53:23 -0000 1.14 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.%{upstream_date} -Release: 13%{?dist} +Release: 14%{?dist} Summary: Truetype greek fonts Group: User Interface/X License: MgOpen @@ -157,6 +157,10 @@ %files compat %changelog +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-14 +- Fix fontconfig file for moderna ,i.e. + https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425#c7 + * Wed Jan 21 2009 Sarantis Paskalis - 0.20050515-13 - Drop provides mgopen-fonts for the -compat subpackage. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/mgopen-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 20 Jan 2009 10:55:22 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 25 Jan 2009 14:53:23 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ 9ad4bba3d173e92734320286bfff4c8e MgOpen-20050515.tar.gz eb667a1458a92bc4d4e9a1f5924f6e61 MgOpen-20050515-doc.tar.gz -99aed78f4c58e3ca4b7502f0adff7075 mgopen-fontconfig.tar.gz +878dfd8fadd0aa63ade2f915fa942bcd mgopen-fontconfig.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251504.n0PF4iFA026037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477425, which changed state. Bug 477425 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251504.n0PF4hX0026012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-25 10:04:42 EDT --- Fixed in 0.20050515-14 (rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251520.n0PFK0BZ028657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477462, which changed state. Bug 477462 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251520.n0PFK0S9028631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-25 10:19:59 EDT --- tetex-font-kerkis blocked from rawhide. ctan-kerkis-fonts built in rawhide. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 15:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477462] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251516.n0PFGsbt015199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462 Bug 477462 depends on bug 480591, which changed state. Bug 480591 Summary: Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251614.n0PGEXl3024320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251629.n0PGTqw7007235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|478662 |481484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251629.n0PGTsFn007296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251629.n0PGTrZV007262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251631.n0PGVROD027175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251631.n0PGVQ4R027131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251636.n0PGaWhN008832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|478662 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251635.n0PGZqe9008607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #11 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-25 11:35:50 EDT --- kdeedu / khangman from kde 4.2 doesn't seem to ship dustismo anymore - only SteveHand (called steve.ttf in kdeedu) and Domestic_Manners.ttf (which still needs to be packaged). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251636.n0PGaVg2008788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251639.n0PGdLi8028316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-25 11:39:21 EDT --- There's no copy of Dustismo Roman in our 4.2.0 packages because we're using the copy you packaged and removing the shipped one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 16:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251648.n0PGmLRM029829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #18 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-25 11:48:20 EDT --- right - dumbest bz-comment of the week-award accepted - sorry for the noise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251715.n0PHFs4H015114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |herlo1 at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 12:15:53 EDT --- The SPEC still includes a install -m 0643 -p %{SOURCE1} I'll approve the package, but please fix this before import in cvs. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the wiki and comps bits. Thank your for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251719.n0PHJseo002450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251725.n0PHPePX003834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251725.n0PHPdjq003791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] New: Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: notting at redhat.com CC: katzj at redhat.com, jkeating at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 457281 Blocks: 477044 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Renaming of unikurd-web-font to kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-1.fc10.src.rpm Blocking request: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251727.n0PHRKmx004000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251727.n0PHRKFG004008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251734.n0PHYB51004835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 12:34:10 EDT --- Well, your descriptions and summaries are underwhelming, but I'm not exactly the best placed to complain. The rest is sane ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the wiki and comps bits. Thank you for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: 2bc-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251748.n0PHmNFD007194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Clint Savage 2009-01-25 12:48:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts Short Description: To Be Continued is a decorative/graffiti sans-serif font. Owners: herlo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251757.n0PHvshD008910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 12:57:53 EDT --- ? and ? are tricky to get right in rpm do yourself a favour, start at Release: 2 and Obsoletes: unikurd-web-font < 20020502-2 That will work easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251822.n0PIMAJq025765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251829.n0PIT3QU026761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-25 13:29:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Sorry - typo - SJ, not DJ-Fonts: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sj-fonts Short Description: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251827.n0PIRt02026603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-25 13:27:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dj-fonts Short Description: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477406] kdeedu: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251832.n0PIWHeI014670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251832.n0PIWFjD014627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251833.n0PIX9SP014794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-25 13:33:08 EDT --- Updated: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts/kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-2.fc10.src.rpm * Sun Jan 25 2009 Michal Nowak - 20020502-2 - repackage to save myself a grief -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251853.n0PIrZ7K031106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mnowak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-25 13:53:34 EDT --- upgrade path works ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251859.n0PIx5Ki019157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 13:59:04 EDT --- I think I have a fix to this problem (but not compatible with the latest .sfd format in use at http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd) and some justification for it. I hope someone can fix the font correspondingly. I am put up with an old Mandriva distro with pango-1.10.0-3mdk and fontforge-1.0-0.20050809.1mdk. I used the Lohit Telugu font extracted from lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm and the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm. For comparing the fonts, I created .sfd's using the above fontforge (which cannot create or open the latest .sfd format). I extracted the sources for pango-1.10.0-3mdk and added a few debug messages and observed the difference between the messages produced while rendering "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d" for the 2 fonts (pasting the combination into the font selection dialog for gvim while Pothana2000 is selected and then selecting Lohit Telugu). The debug messages show a "haln" substitution that is performed only for Pothana2000 and not Lohit Telugu. The entire sequence of substitutions for Pothana2000 is: ya + ra + halant + halant (Pango-reordered) --blwf-> ya + below-base-ra + halant --blws-> ya + wide-below-base-ra + halant --haln-> ya-halant + below-base-ra. The way Pothana2000 differs from Lohit Telugu is two-fold. First, the below-base forms are shown with "gproperties 0x8" in the messages as opposed to "gproperties 0x2" which corresponds to the opentype glyph class "mark" as opposed to "base glyph." >From Pothana2000.sfd: ChainSub: coverage 0 1 'blws' 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Coverage: 25 RaOttuWide1 RaOttuMiddle1 BCoverage: 114 Jha Ya ... 1 SeqLookup: 0 'L005' EndFPST ... StartChar: RaOttuWide1 ... GlyphClass: 4 ... EndChar ... StartChar: RaOttuMiddle1 ... GlyphClass: 4 ... Substitution: 0 65534 'L005' RaOttuWide1 ... Ligature: 0 1 'blwf' Ra Halanth EndChar >From Lohit-Telugu.sfd: ChainSub: coverage 0 0 'blws' 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Coverage: 16 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf BCoverage: 5 U0C2F 1 SeqLookup: 0 'L321' EndFPST ... StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.blwf ... GlyphClass: 2 ... Substitution: 0 65534 'L321' glyph495 ... Ligature: 0 0 'blwf' U0C30 U0C4D EndChar ... StartChar: glyph495 ... GlyphClass: 2 ... EndChar Second, the ligation rules for halanth say all marks of other types according to the "MarkAttachClasses" should be ignored. >From Pothana2000.sfd: MarkAttachClasses: 11 ... "MarkClass-10" 7 Halanth ... StartChar: YaHalanth ... GlyphClass: 3 ... Ligature: 2560 1 'haln' Ya Halanth ... EndChar (Note 2560 = 0xa00, i.e. all marks of types other than type 10 -- which happens to be called MarkClass-10 and includes just the halanth -- should be ignored) >From Lohit Telugu.sfd: StartChar: U0C2F_U0C4D.haln ... GlyphClass: 2 ... Ligature: 0 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D ... EndChar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251931.n0PJVhEU005698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #5 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 14:31:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329950) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329950) Debug statements added to my local version of pango I have attached the diff for pango-1.10.0-3mdk to better understand the debug messages that show the processing of the two fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251940.n0PJemVx007275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 14:40:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329951) Debug messages produced by my local version of pango Actually we don't need various "MarkAttachClasses" to fix this bug. We can just make the ligation rules for "haln" say all types of marks should be ignored (using "8" instead of "2560" above) while applying the rule, and ensure that all below base forms are flagged as "mark." This is sufficient for ya + wide-below-base-ra + halant --haln-> ya-halant + wide-below-base-ra. I made the following change to Lohit-Telugu.sfd and created a new lohit-te.ttf from that. The modified font renders "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d" correctly: --- /tmp/orig/Lohit-Telugu.sfd 2009-01-24 18:10:48.000000000 +0530 +++ /tmp/Lohit-Telugu.sfd 2009-01-26 00:08:06.000000000 +0530 @@ -33780,7 +33780,7 @@ 760 170 760 170 760 243 c 1,99,-1 760 243 l 1,13,14 EndSplineSet -Ligature: 0 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D +Ligature: 8 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D EndChar StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.haln Encoding: 420 -1 420 @@ -36649,7 +36649,7 @@ StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.blwf Encoding: 464 -1 464 Width: 0 -GlyphClass: 2 +GlyphClass: 4 Flags: W AnchorPoint: "Anchor-0" -324 -56 mark 0 Fore @@ -39468,7 +39468,7 @@ StartChar: glyph495 Encoding: 499 -1 499 Width: 0 -GlyphClass: 2 +GlyphClass: 4 Flags: W AnchorPoint: "Anchor-0" -492 -51 mark 0 Fore The attachment contains the debug messages my pango modification produces for Pothana2000, Lohit Telugu, and my modified Lohit Telugu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261145.n0QBjeCA017409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-26 06:45:39 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (andika-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) (Also done a quick QA review, did not find anything questionable). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261142.n0QBgMDf004910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-26 06:42:21 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (charis-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The changelog line references apanov-edrip-fonts, please correct this before importing. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261226.n0QCQs4X026128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 07:26:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261234.n0QCYBYu027431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 07:34:11 EDT --- Doh, will fix of course before import (can you review the renaming of edrip too please?) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 12:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261236.n0QCa6VZ015881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 07:36:05 EDT --- (please do not forget your cvs request now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261321.n0QDLlqF026291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-26 08:21:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Owners: mnowak rename unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts just for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261347.n0QDlK2T032000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 08:47:18 EDT --- (and the usual CCs please, see bug #481478 for an example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261401.n0QE1XLA015412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-26 09:01:32 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts Owners: mnowak Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes rename unikurd-web-font ? kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts just for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 14:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261433.n0QEXpvp023209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-01-26 09:33:50 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (edrip-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The license patch in the spec file is a bit mysterious, so I had to dig CVS history to see why it was there in the first place. Could you please restore the spec file comments explaining the need for this patch? Or alternatively (if you don't want to litter the spec file with comments) put it in another FILE mentioned in the spec? No other comments, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 15:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261511.n0QFBS4W021384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 10:11:27 EDT --- I should probably check with Spot if the patch is still needed, upstream did imporve its licensing documentation lately Anyway: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481532] luit crashes and burns. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261651.n0QGpD9j024310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481532 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Component|xorg-x11-apps |xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |sandmann at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261728.n0QHStcM019452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-26 12:28:53 EDT --- Examining the fonts reveals that there are 33 distinct font families here. Do I really need to create 33 subpackages or will feta, feta-alphabet, feta-braces and parmesan suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261738.n0QHctni001606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-26 12:38:54 EDT --- If you'd ask me, it would be enough just to have feta and parmesan, 2 subpackages. Or maybe just one type1 subpackage. But Nicolas is the boss here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 17:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261741.n0QHfrdR002519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-26 12:41:52 EDT --- Looks OK to me. Once it's built, I'll finish fixing moodle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261809.n0QI9PNs007938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 13:09:25 EDT --- You can clearly put the different sizes of foo-XX fonts together As to the different feta elements, you'll have to ask Jonathan Underwood or another TEXie. google-droid-sans has some rules to consolidate different font families in a single one fontconfig-side, you should also play with them. This stuff screams 'legacy that should have been converted to a few big OTF fonts logn ago' to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261831.n0QIVHFH000877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-26 13:31:16 EDT --- Jonathan, any thoughts on how to proceed here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgGtS007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgJpm007981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262042.n0QKgH0k007939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262045.n0QKjpfh029731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 20:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262059.n0QKxtgA011549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sven at lank.es Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 15:59:54 EDT --- You have the wrong source archive and the review link in your wiki page is not pointing here. The rest of the package is perfect and you're an experienced packager so I'll approve anyway but do make sure you push the right font in koji. ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477408] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262102.n0QL2Cai012380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477408 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Fixed In Version| |khmeros-fonts-5.0-5.fc11 --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-26 16:02:11 EDT --- 5.0-5 just built in Rawhide. Let me know if there are ongoing issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 21:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262146.n0QLkr1A010274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-01-26 16:46:53 EDT --- Thank you for another font review, Nicolas. I have already fixed the issues you noted and uploaded an updated spec. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts Short Description: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262214.n0QMEfMl027354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:14:40 EDT --- Please include all the info you would with a new package request moving forward? (It's a pain to have to look up the Short description everytime) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262218.n0QMI4PL028189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #7 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-26 17:18:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330034) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330034) untested patch for Lohit-Telugu.sfd I hand edited http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd for my suggested changes and a few more changes and created the attached patch. The changes made are: 1. Every "GlyphClass:" line is fixed to reflect if the glyph is a "mark" (4) or a "ligature" (3). [For the specific issue at hand, changing "GlyphClass:" for all below base forms ("*.blwf" & glyphs got by substituting those, "glyph471," "U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws" & "glyph473") is enough.] 2. Lookup flags of "Above Base Substitutions in Telugu lookup 1" and "Halant Forms in Telugu lookup 317" is changed from 0 to 8 to ignore marks. [For the specific issue at hand, the second change is enough.] 3. What seem to be typos in "Ligature2:" lines are fixed -- "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" -> "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" and "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" -> "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf." [These are of course unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to "Ligature2:" lines for the glyphs "U0C38_U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws" and "U0C37_U0C1F_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws."] 4. What seem to be erroneous "akhn" rules for consonant sequences without halanths -- "U0C38 U0C24 U0C30 U0C40" -> "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" and "U0C37 U0C1F U0C30 U0C40" -> "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf." [These are also unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to "Ligature2:" lines for the glyphs "U0C38_U0C24_U0C30_U0C40.akhn" and "U0C37_U0C1F_U0C30_U0C40.akhn." The new sequences I have put are inspired by the "akhn" rules fixed in step 3 above.] The extra changes in 1 and 2 allow better rendering for rendering engines that do not position the base consonant and the matra immediately next to each other. E.g. before the change in http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango?limit_changes=100&view=revision&revision=2107 Pothana2000 rendered consonant + "ai-matra (0x0C48)" correctly as it ignored the intervening "ai length mark (0x0C56)" when combining the consonant with the "e-matra (0x0C46)." These changes will allow Lohit Telugu to also handle this case with renderers other than pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262229.n0QMTWLC030834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:29:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429901] [te_IN] upon joined character the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262229.n0QMThWX018993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429901 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-26 17:29:41 EDT --- Using ZWJ as in bug 451203 for the combination "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d", pango uses the character sequence "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d U+200d" as is instead of the reordered sequence "U+0c2f U+0c30 U+0c4d U+0c4d." With the former sequence the glyphs added are "U+0c2f+halanth below-base-U+0c30 U+200d" whereas with the latter we get "U+0c2f below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" followed by substitution of below-base-U+0c30 with a wider glyph due to the context of U+0c2f. Now the rendering of "U+0c2f wide-below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" can be fixed as suggested in bug 476427 to get "U+0c2f+halanth wide-below-base-U+0c30" which isn't possible with ZWJ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262239.n0QMdGEt020979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:39:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262248.n0QMmeIW002629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 17:48:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-andika-fonts Short Description: A font for literacy and beginning readers Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262249.n0QMntSj002867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: 2bc-fonts - |Review Request: |A stylized font |chisholm-to-be-continued-fo | |nts - A stylized font Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:49:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477476] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262247.n0QMll7e023254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Fixed In Version| |kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20 | |020502-2.fc11 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2009-01-26 17:47:45 EDT --- Fixed here: kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts-20020502-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262250.n0QMo18T023745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 17:50:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apanov-edrip-fonts Short Description: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Owners: nim Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Edrip font is a contrast sans-serif font. It is based on the Teams font released on 2000 by TopTeam Co. Edrip contains symbols for basic Cyrillic and Latin alphabets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262250.n0QMoRo2024067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-26 17:50:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-fonts Short Description: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Owners: nim kevin roozbeh Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262256.n0QMu77n025123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:56:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262256.n0QMuk4T004615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262259.n0QMxlJg004910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 17:59:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262301.n0QN1wn4026690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-26 18:01:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 26 23:56:42 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.12,1.13 Message-ID: <20090126235642.E3A05700DD@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17869 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: * Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-17.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts. Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.12 retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 22 Jan 2009 05:49:22 -0000 1.12 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 26 Jan 2009 23:56:12 -0000 1.13 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.2 -Release: 16%{?dist} +Release: 17%{?dist} Summary: Free Korean TrueType fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5 +Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-16 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc @@ -151,6 +152,10 @@ %__rm -rf %{buildroot} %changelog +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-17.fc11 +- Resolves: rhbz#477332 +- Fixed obsoletion of baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts. + * Thu Jan 22 2009 Caius Chance - 2.2-16.fc11 - Resolves: rhbz#477332 - Refined dependencies. From cchance at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 00:01:34 2009 From: cchance at fedoraproject.org (Caius Chance) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,1.13,1.14 Message-ID: <20090127000134.B821C7010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18491 Modified Files: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec Log Message: corrected -common-fonts obsoletion version number Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 26 Jan 2009 23:56:12 -0000 1.13 +++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 27 Jan 2009 00:01:04 -0000 1.14 @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-korean < 2.2-5 Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko < 1.0.11-33, fonts-korean < 2.2-5 -Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-16 +Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 %description -n %{fontname}-fonts-common %common_desc From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270039.n0R0dsQO024698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-26 19:39:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Your -common subpackage needs to obsolete baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80378 Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nIwW006547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-26 20:49:17 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270149.n0R1nKUU006581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rJMd008606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-26 20:53:18 EDT --- ctan-musixtex-fonts-1.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270153.n0R1rBgA008566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-26 20:53:10 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pnMI028811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-26 20:51:48 EDT --- dustin-dustismo-fonts-20030318-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 01:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478662] Review Request: dustin-dustismo-fonts - font with serif and sans-serif versions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270151.n0R1pqLx028911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 06:56:27 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch, NONE, 1.1 apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127065627.889707010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25060/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: edrip-fonts ??? apanov-edrip-fonts --- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Edrip Edrip fantasy Teams Edrip apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch: --- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts-license.patch --- --- edrip-src-20080317.orig/OFL.txt 2008-03-08 04:31:55.000000000 +0100 +++ edrip-src-20080317/OFL.txt 2008-03-27 00:04:29.000000000 +0100 @@ -5,6 +5,36 @@ This license is copied below, and is also available with a FAQ at: http://scripts.sil.org/OFL +The Font Software incorporates work covered by the following copyright and +permission notice: + +%<---------------------------------------------------------------------------- +The Teams font without an explicit copyright is covered by the following +copyright/license: + +Copyright (C) 1994-2000 The TopTeam Co. All Rights Reserved. + +Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy +of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal +in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights +to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell +copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is +furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + +The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all +copies or substantial portions of the Software. + +THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR +IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, +FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL +TOPTEAM CO. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN +ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION +WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. + +Except as contained in this notice, the name of TopTeam Co. shall not be used +in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this +Software without prior written authorization from TopTeam Co. +%<---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE Version 1.1 - 26 February 2007 --- NEW FILE apanov-edrip-fonts.spec --- %define fontname apanov-edrip %define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename edrip-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: ftp://ftp.dvo.ru/pub/Font/%{fontname}/ Source0: %{url}%{archivename}.tar.bz2 Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Patch0: %{name}-license.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: xgridfit BuildRequires: fontforge Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: edrip-fonts < 20081007-3 %description Edrip font is a contrast sans-serif font. It is based on the Teams font released on 2000 by TopTeam Co. Edrip contains symbols for basic Cyrillic and Latin alphabets. %prep %setup -q -c %patch0 -p1 %build make %{?_smp_mflags} all %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt README %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 - 20081007-3 ??? renamed to ???apanov-edrip-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 20081007-2 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? * Fri Nov 14 2008 - 20081007-1 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? * Wed Sep 3 2008 - 20080826-2 ??? Rebuild with pre-F10-freeze fontforge * Mon Sep 1 2008 - 20080826-1 ?? Still more extended cyrillic coverage * Fri Jul 17 2008 - 20080717-1 ???? More cyrillic coverage * Fri Jul 11 2008 - 20080710-1 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup * Wed Jun 4 2008 - 20080523-2 ??? Fix URL ??? Register in new fantasy generic * Mon May 26 2008 - 20080523-1 ?? Add bold italic typeface to the font package ?? Use new upstream makefile magic to simplify spec * Sun May 18 2008 - 20080515-2 ??? Add bold & italic typeface to the font package * Fri Apr 4 2008 - 20080330-1 ??? Fast upstream changes * Tue Mar 27 2008 - 20080317-3 ??? Fix source URL ??? Add more fontconfig magic * Wed Mar 26 2008 - 20080317-1 ??? Fedora import * Thu Mar 13 2008 - 20080310-1 ??? Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233039319 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:56:20 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 06:55:56 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +edrip-src-20081007.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:56:20 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 06:55:57 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +b745af94b865df2b0c20fe72ff58b568 edrip-src-20081007.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 06:57:51 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-andika-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127065751.59FD37010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25698/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-andika-fonts.spec Log Message: andika-fonts ??? sil-andika-fonts --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-andika-fonts-1_0-4_fc11:HEAD:sil-andika-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233039407 --- NEW FILE sil-andika-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif Andika Andika sans-serif --- NEW FILE sil-andika-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sil-andika %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf # Someday SIL will release sanely named archives %define archivename AndikaBasicR_10 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: A font for literacy and beginning readers Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/Andika # Actual download URL # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=%{archivename}&filename=%{archivename}.zip Source0: %{archivename}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: andika-fonts < 1.0-4 %description Andika is a sans serif, Unicode-compliant font designed especially for literacy use, taking into account the needs of beginning readers. The focus is on clear, easy-to-perceive letterforms that will not be readily confused with one another. A sans serif font is preferred by some literacy personnel for teaching people to read. Its forms are simpler and less cluttered than those of most serif fonts. For years, literacy workers have had to make do with fonts that were not really suitable for beginning readers and writers. In some cases, literacy specialists have had to tediously assemble letters from a variety of fonts in order to get all of the characters they need for their particular language project, resulting in confusing and unattractive publications. Andika addresses those issues. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} # Text files sanitization for txt in *.txt ; do # Unicode compliant, check iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 -o $txt.1 $txt fold -s $txt.1 > $txt.2 sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.2 touch -r $txt $txt.2 mv $txt.2 $txt rm $txt.1 done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 - 1.0-4 ??? renamed to ???sil-andika-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 1.0-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? * Fri Nov 14 2008 - 1.0-2 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? * Tue Jun 24 2008 - 1.0-1 ??? Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 23:02:25 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 06:57:20 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +AndikaBasicR_10.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-andika-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 23:02:25 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 06:57:21 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1a8b028ccea53e93fc4f34ca226f2b02 AndikaBasicR_10.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481476] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__charis-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-charis-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78kPj030666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481472] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_edrip-fonts_=E2=87=92_ap?= =?utf-8?q?anov-edrip-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78ioj030592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481478] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?__andika-fonts_=E2=87=92_?= =?utf-8?q?sil-andika-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78nOT030739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78o2h030779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481478, which changed state. Bug 481478 Summary: Renaming review: andika-fonts ? sil-andika-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481478 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78mq5030709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481476, which changed state. Bug 481476 Summary: Renaming review: charis-fonts ? sil-charis-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270708.n0R78joO030637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481472, which changed state. Bug 481472 Summary: Renaming review: edrip-fonts ? apanov-edrip-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 07:14:49 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sil-charis-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127071449.312127010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29227/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf sil-charis-fonts.spec Log Message: charis-fonts ??? sil-charis-fonts --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-charis-fonts-4_104-6_fc11:HEAD:sil-charis-fonts-4.104-6.fc11.src.rpm:1233040224 --- NEW FILE sil-charis-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- serif Charis SIL Charis SIL serif Bitstream Charter Charis SIL Charis SIL Literacy Charis SIL --- NEW FILE sil-charis-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sil-charis %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf %define archivename CharisSIL Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.104 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A serif smart font similar to Bitstream Charter Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/CharisSILFont # Actual download URL # http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=%{archivename}.zip&filename=%{archivename}%{version}.zip Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Obsoletes: charis-fonts < 4.104-5 %description Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ??? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ??? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} for txt in *.txt ; do fold -s $txt > $txt.new sed -i 's/\r//' $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc *.txt *.pdf %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Tue Jan 27 2009 - 4.104-6 ??? renamed to ???sil-charis-fonts??? to apply Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 4.104-4 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? * Fri Nov 14 2008 - 4.104-3 ??? Rebuild using new ????rpm-fonts???? * Fri Jul 11 2008 - 4.104-2 ??? Fedora 10 alpha general package cleanup * Sun May 18 2008 - 4.104-1 ??? New Unicode 5.1 compliant release, with some glyphs moved out of PUA * Sat Nov 3 2007 ??? 4.100-5 ??? Sync with guidelines ??? fix config file misplacement * Thu Nov 1 2007 ??? 4.100-4 ??? Sync with guidelines ??? new fontconfig aliasing syntax * Tue Aug 28 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 4.100-3 ??? Sync with dejavu spec ??? Licence++ * Thu Jun 21 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 4.100-2 ??? Fix URL (bug #245101) * Thu May 31 2007 Nicolas Mailhot ??? 4.100-1 ??? add fontconfig setup file ??? make spec closer to the dejavu one to simplify maintenance * Thu Nov 09 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.02-3 - Remove ghost-ed fontconfig cache files * Tue Sep 19 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 4.0.02-2 - Rebuild for fc6 - Add dist tag * Sat Feb 18 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.02-1 - Initial packaging, based on gentium-fonts Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 23:00:06 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +CharisSIL4.104.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sil-charis-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 23:00:06 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 07:14:18 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +acc153c243b90e3e5d0bb53476ab894e CharisSIL4.104.zip From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 09:03:12 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.35, 1.36 fontconfig.spec, 1.117, 1.118 sources, 1.36, 1.37 Message-ID: <20090127090312.188AB7010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20645 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Jan 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb - Update to 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.35 retrieving revision 1.36 diff -u -r1.35 -r1.36 --- .cvsignore 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.35 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.36 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.94.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.117 retrieving revision 1.118 diff -u -r1.117 -r1.118 --- fontconfig.spec 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.117 +++ fontconfig.spec 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.118 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.94 -Release: 1.git.65.g628ee83%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.95 +Release: 1.git.66.gb162bfb%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb +- Update to 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb + * Fri Jan 23 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 - Update to 2.6.94-1.git.65.g628ee83 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.36 retrieving revision 1.37 diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37 --- sources 23 Jan 2009 19:21:24 -0000 1.36 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 09:02:41 -0000 1.37 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ba79ff72570a91698fb2f76ef255e5e4 fontconfig-2.6.94.tar.gz +d568673bb06705503b66eac28c2a2e51 fontconfig-2.6.95.tar.gz From rhughes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 09:50:03 2009 From: rhughes at fedoraproject.org (Richard Hughes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontpackages/devel fontconfig.prov, NONE, 1.1 macros.fontconfig, NONE, 1.1 fontpackages.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090127095003.C83927010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rhughes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontpackages/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30318 Modified Files: fontpackages.spec Added Files: fontconfig.prov macros.fontconfig Log Message: * Tue Jan 27 2009 Richard Hughes - 1.16-2 - Add fontconfig.prov and macros.fontconfig so that we can automatically generate font provides for packages at build time. This lets us do some cool things with PackageKit in the future. --- NEW FILE fontconfig.prov --- #!/bin/bash # # Script to install in: # /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-provides.d # # Transform font files into RPM provides # Requires fontconfig >= 2.6.90 # # Author: Behdad Esfahbod # Based on other provides scripts from RPM # grep '^/usr/share/fonts/' | xargs fc-query --format '%{family}\n:lang=%{lang}\n' | while read line; do case $line in :lang=*) langs=${line#:lang=} OLDIFS=$IFS IFS='|' for lang in $langs; do echo :lang=$lang done IFS=$OLDIFS ;; *) echo "$line" | tr 'A-Z_' 'a-z-' | tr -d -c 'a-z0-9-\n' ;; esac done | sed 's/\(.*\)/Font(\1)/' | sort -u --- NEW FILE macros.fontconfig --- %__fontconfig_provides /usr/lib/rpm/fontconfig.prov Index: fontpackages.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- fontpackages.spec 21 Jan 2009 21:45:16 -0000 1.7 +++ fontpackages.spec 27 Jan 2009 09:49:32 -0000 1.8 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: fontpackages Version: 1.16 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Group: Development/System @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ License: LGPLv3+ URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages/ Source0: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/f/o/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Source1: fontconfig.prov +Source2: macros.fontconfig BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) @@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ install -m 0644 -p spec-templates/*.spec %{buildroot}%{spectemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p fontconfig-templates/* %{buildroot}%{ftcgtemplatedir} install -m 0644 -p macros/macros* %{buildroot}%{rpmmacrodir} +install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov +install -m 0755 -D -p %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig cat < %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) @@ -85,6 +89,8 @@ %files filesystem -f %{name}-%{version}.files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %dir %{_datadir}/fontconfig +%{_libdir}/rpm/fontconfig.prov +%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.fontconfig %files devel @@ -97,6 +103,12 @@ %changelog +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Richard Hughes +- 1.16-2 +- Add fontconfig.prov and macros.fontconfig so that we can automatically + generate font provides for packages at build time. + This lets us do some cool things with PackageKit in the future. + * Wed Jan 22 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.16-1 From mnowak at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 20:53:36 2009 From: mnowak at fedoraproject.org (Michal Nowak) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE import.log, 1.1, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE unikurd-web-font.spec, 1.1, NONE Message-ID: <20090127205336.70E107010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mnowak Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/unikurd-web-font/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2567 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile import.log sources unikurd-web-font.spec Log Message: Renamed to kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts --- Makefile DELETED --- --- import.log DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- --- unikurd-web-font.spec DELETED --- From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Jan 27 21:43:59 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 378338] Deal with X servers which misreport the screen's dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090127214359.E93E623F58F@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338 gnome-control-center | settings-daemon | Ver: trunk Fryderyk Dziarmagowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|freetz at gmx.net | -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378338. From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:08:20 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127220821.023D27010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14948/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE import.log --- sj-fonts-2_0_2-1_fc10:HEAD:sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233094032 --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Delphine Delphine fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SteveHand SteveHand fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sj %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 with exceptions URL: http://sjfonts.sourceforge.net Source0: sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 Source1: %{name}-delphine-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-stevehand-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: fontforge %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n delphine -f %{fontconf}-delphine.conf Delphine.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n stevehand -f %{fontconf}-stevehand.conf SteveHand.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build fontforge -script "-" Delphine.sfd SteveHand.sfd < - 2.0.2-1 - Initial packaging Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:29:53 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 22:07:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:29:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:07:50 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f06986cab16248de493109bb2bd1027e sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:12:14 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127221214.7BCF67010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15621/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Domestic Manners Domestic Manners fantasy --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-domestic-manners %define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Domestic_Manners.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and some special characters (most European Latin characters). %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging --- NEW FILE import.log --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1_fc10:HEAD:dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233094261 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:39:40 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 27 Jan 2009 22:11:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Domestic_Manners.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:39:40 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:11:44 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3f5d0178f3b9f9bbabd697090f89c3b9 Domestic_Manners.zip From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Jan 27 22:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 346419] Add Baseline table support (align scripts in a line of text) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090127222646.4C7FF23F52E@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419 pango | general | Ver: unspecified Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roozbeh at gmail.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419. From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:27:04 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127222704.D68057010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17579/F-10 Modified Files: sources Added Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Domestic Manners Domestic Manners fantasy --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-domestic-manners %define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Domestic_Manners.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and some special characters (most European Latin characters). %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:39:40 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3f5d0178f3b9f9bbabd697090f89c3b9 Domestic_Manners.zip From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:27:05 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127222705.08DC77010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17579/F-9 Modified Files: sources Added Files: dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Domestic Manners Domestic Manners fantasy --- NEW FILE dustin-domestic-manners-fonts.spec --- %define fontname dustin-domestic-manners %define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20030527 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Handwriting font by Dustin Norlander Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.dustismo.com # Actual download URL #URL: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-dustin/ttf-dustin_20030517.orig.tar.gz Source0: Domestic_Manners.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description This font mimics the authors handwriting. The name come from the book Domestic Manners of the Americans, by Fanny Trollope. Font contains, letters, numbers, punctuation, accented characters and some special characters (most European Latin characters). %prep %setup -q -c %{name} sed -i 's/\r//' license.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc license.txt %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Sven Lankes - 20030527-1 - Initial packaging Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:39:40 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:26:34 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +3f5d0178f3b9f9bbabd697090f89c3b9 Domestic_Manners.zip From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:33:47 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/F-10 sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127223348.06A7D7010B@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19218/F-10 Modified Files: sources Added Files: sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts.spec Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Delphine Delphine fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SteveHand SteveHand fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sj %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 with exceptions URL: http://sjfonts.sourceforge.net Source0: sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 Source1: %{name}-delphine-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-stevehand-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: fontforge %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n delphine -f %{fontconf}-delphine.conf Delphine.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n stevehand -f %{fontconf}-stevehand.conf SteveHand.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build fontforge -script "-" Delphine.sfd SteveHand.sfd < - 2.0.2-1 - Initial packaging Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:29:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:33:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f06986cab16248de493109bb2bd1027e sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 From slankes at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 27 22:33:48 2009 From: slankes at fedoraproject.org (Sven Lankes) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/F-9 sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 sj-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090127223348.2F7F370141@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: slankes Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19218/F-9 Modified Files: sources Added Files: sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf sj-fonts.spec Log Message: initial commit --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-delphine-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Delphine Delphine fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts-stevehand-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy SteveHand SteveHand fantasy --- NEW FILE sj-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sj %define fontconf 63-%{fontname} %define common_desc Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.0.2 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 with exceptions URL: http://sjfonts.sourceforge.net Source0: sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 Source1: %{name}-delphine-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-stevehand-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: fontforge %description %common_desc %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-delphine-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n delphine -f %{fontconf}-delphine.conf Delphine.ttf %package -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts Summary: Handwriting font Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-stevehand-fonts %common_desc Handwriting font by Steve Jordi covering latin glyphs. %_font_pkg -n stevehand -f %{fontconf}-stevehand.conf SteveHand.ttf %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build fontforge -script "-" Delphine.sfd SteveHand.sfd < - 2.0.2-1 - Initial packaging Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sj-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:29:53 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 27 Jan 2009 22:33:17 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +f06986cab16248de493109bb2bd1027e sjfonts-source-2.0.2.tar.bz2 From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Jan 27 22:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 346419] Add Baseline table support (align scripts in a line of text) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090127223423.4661823F50D@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419 pango | general | Ver: unspecified John Boncek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|JBoncek at Hunter.Com | -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346419. From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 00:56:21 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128005621.E3D857010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10665/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial commit of the chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ToBeContinued fantasy fantasy ToBeContinued --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec --- %define fontname chisholm-to-be-continued %define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/?font=2bc Source0: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/download/2bc.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description To Be Continued is a decorative/graffiti sans-serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104074 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 28 Jan 2009 00:55:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +2bc.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 28 Jan 2009 00:55:51 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d6d137543eefbee592b8364b0eca5ff4 2bc.zip From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 00:58:44 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128005844.758517010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11179/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial commit for the chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts for F-9 --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ToBeContinued fantasy fantasy ToBeContinued --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec --- %define fontname chisholm-to-be-continued %define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/?font=2bc Source0: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/download/2bc.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description To Be Continued is a decorative/graffiti sans-serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:F-9:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104203 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 28 Jan 2009 00:58:13 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +2bc.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 28 Jan 2009 00:58:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d6d137543eefbee592b8364b0eca5ff4 2bc.zip From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 01:01:07 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128010107.C05957010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11846/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: initial commit for the chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts for F-10 --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- ToBeContinued fantasy fantasy ToBeContinued --- NEW FILE chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec --- %define fontname chisholm-to-be-continued %define fontconf 61-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/?font=2bc Source0: http://www.theory.org/~matt/fonts/free/download/2bc.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description To Be Continued is a decorative/graffiti sans-serif font. %prep %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf %doc %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package --- NEW FILE import.log --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:F-10:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104317 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 28 Jan 2009 01:00:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +2bc.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 26 Jan 2009 22:50:13 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 28 Jan 2009 01:00:37 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +d6d137543eefbee592b8364b0eca5ff4 2bc.zip From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 01:27:36 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128012736.5005E7010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16478/devel Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: the change log was incorrect, fixed. Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 00:55:51 -0000 1.1 +++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:27:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 28 Jan 2009 00:55:51 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:27:05 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104074 +chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233105943 From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 01:49:42 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090128014942.D745B7010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20014/devel Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fixing a typo in the spec changelog Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:27:05 -0000 1.2 +++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:49:12 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-2 +Fixed a typo in the changelog * Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:27:05 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:49:12 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104074 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233105943 +chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2_fc10:HEAD:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10.src.rpm:1233107275 From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 01:52:07 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128015207.0E1C07010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20601/F-10 Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fixed a typo in the changelog Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:00:37 -0000 1.1 +++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:51:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -52,7 +52,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-2 +Fixed a typo in the changelog +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-10/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:00:37 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:51:36 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:F-10:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104317 +chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2_fc10:F-10:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10.src.rpm:1233107414 From herlo at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 01:55:15 2009 From: herlo at fedoraproject.org (Clint Savage) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9 chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090128015515.AE7D57010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: herlo Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21117/F-9 Modified Files: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fixed a typo in the changelog Index: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 00:58:14 -0000 1.1 +++ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 01:54:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090124 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Decorative Sans Serif Font Group: User Interface/X @@ -52,7 +52,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 +* Tue Jan 27 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-2 +Fixed a typo in the changelog +* Sun Jan 25 2009 Clint Savage 20090124-1 Correctly licensed font * Fri Jan 23 2009 Clint Savage 19990319-1 Initial rpm package Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts/F-9/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 28 Jan 2009 00:58:14 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 28 Jan 2009 01:54:45 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1_fc10:F-9:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233104203 +chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2_fc10:F-9:chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10.src.rpm:1233107501 From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280735.n0S7ZxnG020539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Flag| |needinfo?(sergei at regolit.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-28 02:35:57 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/browser/trunk/src/LiberationSans-Regular.sfd has hinting instructions within U+0431. afaik, only hinting is affected by hinting instructions. Which software have you used to generate screenshot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280736.n0S7aVZc015009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280835.n0S8ZihB032438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #48 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-28 03:35:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330210) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330210) Screenshot with rawhide and qt-4.4.3-13.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 10:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281043.n0SAhgQb023267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Bug 477448 depends on bug 480269, which changed state. Bug 480269 Summary: libraries in 1.7.5 broken for missing symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480269 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-28 05:43:41 EDT --- OK, I've added a new changelog entry. Is it OK?!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 28 10:50:39 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel sazanami-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090128105039.2513E7010D@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16599 Modified Files: sazanami-fonts.spec Log Message: * Wed Jan 28 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.20040629-6.20061016 - Rename the package name again. Index: sazanami-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/sazanami-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sazanami-fonts.spec 25 Dec 2008 05:59:47 -0000 1.4 +++ sazanami-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 10:50:08 -0000 1.5 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.20040629 -Release: 5.%{fontver}%{?dist} +Release: 6.%{fontver}%{?dist} BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: ttmkfdir >= 3.0.6 @@ -44,30 +44,30 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. -%package gothic +%package -n %{fontname}-gothic-fonts Summary: Sazanami Gothic Japanese TrueType font License: BSD Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-9.fc8 -Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja < 1.2-37 +Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-gothic = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja < 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-gothic < 0.20040629-6.20061016 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description gothic +%description -n %{fontname}-gothic-fonts %common_desc This package contains Japanese TrueType font for Gothic type face. -%package mincho +%package -n %{fontname}-mincho-fonts Summary: Sazanami Mincho Japanese TrueType font License: BSD Group: User Interface/X Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-9.fc8 -Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37 -Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja < 1.2-37 +Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-mincho = %{version}-%{release} +Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja < 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-mincho < 0.20040629-6.20061016 Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} -%description mincho +%description -n %{fontname}-mincho-fonts %common_desc This package contains Japanese TrueType font for Mincho type face. @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Jan 28 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.20040629-6.20061016 +- Rename the package name again. + * Thu Dec 25 2008 Akira TAGOH - 0.20040629-5.20061016 - Update the spec file to fit into new guideline. (#477453) From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281222.n0SCMBTU018648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #17 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-28 07:22:09 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281224.n0SCO0q4018873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #18 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-28 07:23:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 12:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281225.n0SCPD2x013282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281406.n0SE62ll011350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477427, which changed state. Bug 477427 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281406.n0SE61QT011326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-28 09:06:00 EDT --- khmeros-fonts, moodle updated in rawhide accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281402.n0SE2bOg003963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Mathieu Bridon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-01-28 09:02:35 EDT --- * I tried to contact the Debian Games SIG that is maintaining Adonthell / Waste's Edge in Debian and got no response from them. * I tried to contact to person on Facebook named C.J. Ellsworth to ask them if they were the author of this font, neither of them answered. => I assume I won't be able to get any more information about the license of the avatar.ttf font. Does this mean I must assume the font is not free and must be removed from the package in Fedora ? If so, then I guess I'll have to rebuild the package for F9, F10 and Rawhide, whereas simply conforming to the recent font guideline would have meant I needed to rebuild only for Rawhide ? (only to be sure I'm fully understanding the issues ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281447.n0SElxPR013236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 09:47:57 EDT --- I'd say that yes, if you have no proof the font is floss you have to assume it isn't, and if there is a legal problem you need to rebuild in all branches. However, do not hesitate to discuss it with spot (either on IRC or by e-mail). He has the final say on legal problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281630.n0SGUOen003476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen 2009-01-28 11:30:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libspiro New Branches: F-9 F-10 Owners: kevin nphilipp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Jan 28 18:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:58:08 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281858.n0SIw8UL009925@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 Boris Zbarsky (:bz) (todo: 175+ items) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #358121|superreview?(bzbarsky at mit.e |superreview+ Flag|du) | --- Comment #58 from Boris Zbarsky (:bz) (todo: 175+ items) 2009-01-28 10:58:00 PST --- (From update of attachment 358121) >+++ b/gfx/src/nsFont.cpp > nsFont::nsFont(const char* aName, PRUint8 aStyle, PRUint8 aVariant, Might be worth it to move these constructors to initializer syntax, maybe. That can be a separate patch, of course. >+++ b/gfx/thebes/public/gfxFontConstants.h >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_ULTRA_CONDENSED -4 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXTRA_CONDENSED -3 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_CONDENSED -2 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_SEMI_CONDENSED -1 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_NORMAL 0 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_SEMI_EXPANDED 1 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXPANDED 2 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXTRA_EXPANDED 3 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_ULTRA_EXPANDED 4 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER 10 >+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER -10 Document or PR_STATIC_ASSERT that WIDER needs to be > ULTRA_EXPANDED - ULTRA_CONDENSED (or rather the min and max "normal" values of font-stretch) and that NARROWER needs to be -WIDER? I assume it does so that we can tell apart ULTRA_CONDENSED+WIDER and other values. >+++ b/layout/style/nsComputedDOMStyle.cpp >+nsComputedDOMStyle::GetFontStretch(nsIDOMCSSValue** aValue) >+ PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER == -10); >+ PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER == 10); How about: PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER % 2 == 0); PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER % 2 == 0); >+ } else if (stretch <= -5) { ... >+ } else if (stretch >= 5) { And make that |stretch <= NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER / 2| and |stretch >= NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER / 2| ? That looks like it should be eqivalent given the range asserts in the header, right? Alternately, if we had a FONT_STRETCH_MIN/MAX declared in the header we could compare to them here (with strict < and >, presumably). sr=bzbarsky with the nits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Jan 28 19:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:17:32 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281917.n0SJHWwg010160@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #59 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-28 11:17:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #58) > Document or PR_STATIC_ASSERT that WIDER needs to be > ULTRA_EXPANDED - > ULTRA_CONDENSED (or rather the min and max "normal" values of font-stretch) and > that NARROWER needs to be -WIDER? I assume it does so that we can tell apart > ULTRA_CONDENSED+WIDER and other values. I'll go with the "document" primarily because using PR_STATIC_ASSERT in header files is a real mess, because it depends on prlog.h, but we in turn depend on setting up FORCE_PR_LOG macros in special ways before the first include of prlog.h, so I'd really prefer to avoid including prlog.h from header files (and I don't want to get into that mess as part of this patch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281958.n0SJwFgi000817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Sergei Stolyarov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sergei at regolit.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Sergei Stolyarov 2009-01-28 14:58:14 EDT --- I used gimp 2.6.3 from Debian. But this symbol looks blurry in all programms. Afaik hints should be rewritten if glyph's shape changed. At least fontforge shows message this when changing any glyph with hints that hints will be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282107.n0SL7IHF021523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 16:07:17 EDT --- It's ok now, I didn't notice before you had made the change in several commits -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282135.n0SLZs9o021315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282135.n0SLZrIl021279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 16:35:52 EDT --- This one seems ok in the few tests I ran, let's close -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282141.n0SLfi0M022527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282141.n0SLfh2Z022501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 16:41:42 EDT --- Just a little nitpicking to keep the unowned-directory people happy; you should replace: %_font_pkg -n %{fontname} opens___.ttf with: %_font_pkg -n %{fontname} opens___.ttf %dir %{_fontdir} (directory ownership of the ttf dir is not automatic because some people do not like multiply-owned directories) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282148.n0SLmwRi023911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 16:48:57 EDT --- oops; probably want to have the srpm named sil-gentium-basic-fonts since we already have a gentium-fonts package that will eventually be renamed sil-gentium-fonts (missed this, sorry, too much stuff to review and too little time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 22:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:28:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282228.n0SMS1lv004347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #36 from Jan Falkenhagen 2009-01-28 17:27:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330294) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330294) rendering issues with uptodate fedora system e.g. xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-63.fc10 the problem still exists for me too. sometimes its better (like shown in the screenshot) sometimes it is worse, but there is no day without this behaviour. graphics card is: 00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282306.n0SN6uOX007860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #3 from Wart 2009-01-28 18:06:56 EDT --- It's still not clear to me what is the correct package name to use which will provide /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf. Currently in rawhide the package is "dejavu-sans-fonts". Is this going to be the final name for this package? I'd hate to keep rebuilding this 55MB+ package just because font package names keep changing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 23:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282328.n0SNSgcO015792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-28 18:28:41 EDT --- we can do that I guess, no skin off my nose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290024.n0T0O4Bt026718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com AssignedTo|ankursinha at fedoraproject.or |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com |g | Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290027.n0T0Rr3B027858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-28 19:27:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290027.n0T0RUcW022801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290032.n0T0WmXa028789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-28 19:32:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290035.n0T0ZKWM024411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-28 19:35:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290038.n0T0cneO029888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-28 19:38:49 EDT --- Updated again in sazanami-fonts-0.20060629-6.20061016.fc11 for new naming rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts make default in chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290058.n0T0wtnB000816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476459] make wqy-zenhei-fonts default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290059.n0T0xiC6000904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|wqy-zenhei-fonts make |make wqy-zenhei-fonts |default in chinese-support |default in @chinese-support |group |group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290628.n0T6SO3u028830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: cf-bonveno-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290634.n0T6Ykbk029844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF |cf-bonveno-fonts - |font |BonvenoCF font Alias|bonvenocf-fonts |cf-bonveno-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290700.n0T70VB3002761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 02:00:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It's still not clear to me what is the correct package name to use which will > provide /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf. Currently in rawhide the > package is "dejavu-sans-fonts". Yes > Is this going to be the final name for this > package? I'd hate to keep rebuilding this 55MB+ package just because font > package names keep changing. It's even more fun to rebuild font packages because FPC decided it wanted pretty package names and forgot to tell you before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290730.n0T7UxEQ008624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roozbeh at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 02:30:57 EDT --- Please rename the package to sil-gentium-basic-fonts. We already have Gentium, which will be renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. Updating the CVS request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-basic-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290733.n0T7XqBG009191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 176096 Blocks: 477335 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 481476 Renaming of gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts-1.02-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290739.n0T7d9kP010433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|482985 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290739.n0T7dALB010450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290739.n0T7d8eH010401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|477335 |477337 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290737.n0T7b7cU003419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |doulos-fonts: convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290737.n0T7bTNj003524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |gentium-fonts: convert to |packaging guidelines |new font packaging | |guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 29 07:44:01 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090129074401.95FE870116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28314/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Thu Jan 29 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-3 - Added package to CVS --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- sans-serif BonvenoCF BonvenoCF sans-serif --- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec --- %define fontname cf-bonveno %define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ URL: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml Source0: http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A set of fun fonts from the crud factory. %prep %setup -q -c for txt in COPYING README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done %build fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd < - 1.1-3 - changed font config file according to files provided in the fontpackages-devel package. * Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-2 - rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines * Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-1 - rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla) --- NEW FILE import.log --- cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:HEAD:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233214810 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +BonvenoCF-1.1.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d BonvenoCF-1.1.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290826.n0T8QVbt021049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Renaming review: |Renaming review: |gentium-fonts to |doulos-fonts to |sil-gentium-fonts |sil-doulos-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290825.n0T8PbpG014268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |482993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roozbeh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 181994 Blocks: 477335 Classification: Fedora Renaming of doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290852.n0T8qUAg025860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-01-29 03:52:29 EDT --- :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 08:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290852.n0T8qVHa025885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477448, which changed state. Bug 477448 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 10:25:08 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Jan 2009 10:25:08 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090129102508.284.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User hdu changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,hdu' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assigned to|hdu |pl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 10:25:08 +0000 2009 ------- @pl, at cmc: please verify in CWS vcl99. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From pl at openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 11:05:34 2009 From: pl at openoffice.org (pl at openoffice.org) Date: 29 Jan 2009 11:05:34 -0000 Subject: [Issue 98139] Interaction of font-fallback and font-replacement table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090129110534.25512.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98139 User pl changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from pl at openoffice.org Thu Jan 29 11:05:33 +0000 2009 ------- fine by me --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291619.n0TGJNlW032228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:19:22 EDT --- Rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291619.n0TGJOMF032262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480479, which changed state. Bug 480479 Summary: [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291636.n0TGaZe8004281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480464, which changed state. Bug 480464 Summary: [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291636.n0TGaYmr004255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:36:33 EDT --- As far as I can tell, this package already requires the correct font package name "bitstream-vera-sans-fonts". Please reopen this bug and offer an alternate font name if you believe this is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291637.n0TGbnlN011599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477432, which changed state. Bug 477432 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 16:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477432] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291637.n0TGbnfn011563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Wart 2009-01-29 11:37:47 EDT --- This appears to have been fixed by another packager. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291818.n0TIIN31031887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 13:18:22 EDT --- It would be better to replace Vera with DejaVu, but I'll fight this battle another day http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 18:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291833.n0TIX8Fh008855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #5 from Wart 2009-01-29 13:33:08 EDT --- If you can give me the dejavu font file name I should use instead of "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraBd.ttf", then I can make the change. Otherwise I'd just be blindly replacing one font with another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 19:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480464] [neverball] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901291911.n0TJBo6u018509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480464 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 14:11:49 EDT --- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf in dejavu-sans-fonts It's just replacing the "Sans Bold" in Vera by the "Sans Bold" in dejavu which is a derivative of the original Vera file. There's no magic arcane mapping involved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292013.n0TKDsoE027040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 20:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292020.n0TKKbZH005019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-01-29 15:20:36 EDT --- O, thank you for your hint. But I have to disagree with you, that ttf files are editable sources. But because upstream doesn't provides sources I think this is not a blocker for this review, So I can APPROVEd your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292139.n0TLdhAv014307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 16:39:42 EDT --- Also the following entries in the FAQ should apply: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 21:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292137.n0TLbn6I014045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Clone Of|481476 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT --- Packaging is sane and upgrade path works ??? APPROVED ??? However: ? Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ) ??Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture for the other and for the gentium basic variants -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480878] fc-cache says that it writes to /var/tmp/${localstatedir}/cache/${PACKAGE} and it does - literally In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292200.n0TM0ijC018590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480878 Michal Jaegermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292207.n0TM7CZ6020009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roozbeh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 17:07:11 EDT --- 1. probably better to use -n with %setup instead of using -c and playing mv games 2. Please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Am_I_done_after_creating_a_new_fonts_.28sub.29package_or_renaming_an_existing_one.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F However, despite the uglyness associated to 1., the package and upgrade path works. ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 22:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292240.n0TMeBMo002195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-29 17:40:10 EDT --- (17:03:02) nphilipp: I'm struggling with making the extremetuxracer Fedora package compliant with the new font packaging guidelines... (17:03:48) nphilipp: The package contains two font files, PaperCuts20.ttf and PaperCuts_outline.ttf 17:05 (17:05:01) nphilipp: I've read through the relevant guidelines in the Wiki, but they seem to center around pure font packages... (17:05:43) nphilipp: Would it be correct to make a noarch subpackage "extremetuxracer-fonts" and leave the files in the same place? (17:07:38) nphilipp: or would it have to be a "extremetuxracer-papercuts-fonts" package with files beneath /usr/share/fonts and symlinks in the mainpackage? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Can_I_just_put_all_my_fonts_in_a_-fonts_subpackage.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_is_a_compliant_font_.28sub.29package.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#If_I_make_my_font_subpackage_noarch_koji_crashes.21 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#But_my_application_crashes_if_I_remove_the_font_file.28s.29.21 Basically our packaging guidelines really want you to locate fonts original upstreams and package them in separate packages, but if you insist on subpackaging your subpackages must conform to guidelines (and there are no templates in that case because there is too much variability) Also, you should put each separate font family in a separate (sub)package that can be installed without dragging in another font package or your app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292301.n0TN1GbE031421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:15 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3uGL032359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:03:55 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292302.n0TN2oU2007400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:02:49 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292303.n0TN3wp3032386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7SXD001677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:28 EDT --- chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292307.n0TN7cGU009794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:07:37 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292310.n0TNArIo003306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:10:53 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sj-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Thu Jan 29 23:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:46:44 -0800 Subject: [Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292346.n0TNkiq4015943@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #60 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-01-29 15:46:23 PST --- OK, I landed those pieces: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cbcf14ce64cc http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e2182ed1e129 so I think what's left here should be the platform-specific parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] Please convert thaifonts-scalable to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292350.n0TNoeAq012129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |Please convert |packaging guidelines |thaifonts-scalable to new | |font packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 00:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300030.n0U0UcUJ019491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 19:30:38 EDT --- I could lower the ranking of uming (Chinese fonts) by increasing the number of the .conf file. Which side would you prefer to make the changes? VL Gothic, Uming, or fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 00:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300043.n0U0hvw1021575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300132.n0U1Wenn005188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 20:32:39 EDT --- The Japanese problem seems to be with Sans: eg if one switches the desktop application font to Monospace then VLGothic is used correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 01:38:02 2009 From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gentium-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, 1.1, NONE gentium-fonts.spec, 1.5, NONE sources, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20090130013802.4D69970117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22232 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: Makefile gentium-fonts.spec sources Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to sil-gentium-fonts --- Makefile DELETED --- --- gentium-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 01:39:55 2009 From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/gentium-fonts/devel .cvsignore,1.2,NONE Message-ID: <20090130013955.E7D4B70117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gentium-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22634 Removed Files: .cvsignore Log Message: Package being renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. --- .cvsignore DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300149.n0U1nlUh000693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sil-gentium-fonts - |sil-gentium-basic-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300159.n0U1xw2U010103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 20:59:58 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and added more description for GentiumAlt. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1262 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: SIL Gentium fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 02:11:20 2009 From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/doulos-fonts/devel dead.package, 1.2, 1.3 .cvsignore, 1.7, NONE Makefile, 1.3, NONE doulos-fonts.spec, 1.7, NONE sources, 1.7, NONE Message-ID: <20090130021120.EE15170117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28865 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: .cvsignore Makefile doulos-fonts.spec sources Log Message: doulos-fonts is getting renamed to sil-doulos-fonts Index: dead.package =================================================================== RCS file: dead.package diff -N dead.package --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ dead.package 30 Jan 2009 02:10:50 -0000 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Renamed to sil-doulos-fonts --- .cvsignore DELETED --- --- Makefile DELETED --- --- doulos-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300220.n0U2KQ3t014012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-29 21:20:25 EDT --- I'm still trying to have a better name for subpackage. I'm quite not sure if we should treat a proportional designed gothic typeface as different font family name to gothic typeface. if we do, which name could we recognize as a family name? is "pgothic" a common sense for that as it's named? or should we have "proportional-gothic" as a family name? I impressed "proportional-gothic" is too long. if you have any suggestion, it would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300216.n0U2GkTt013467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-29 21:16:45 EDT --- Thanks a lot Nicolas. OK, I hope I am doing this all right: * I removed the Provides and cleaned up the %setup -c. I will import the updated version into CVS. * fontconfig settings need to wait a bit, so I can make sure I learn the syntax properly. Next week, I hope. * Blocking request is here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1263 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-doulos-fonts Short Description: Doulos SIL fonts Owners: roozbeh Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300221.n0U2LeJN014285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Many chinese glyphs on |Japanese desktop defaulting |Japanese environment |to Chinese fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300237.n0U2bpkD017264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Regression --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 21:37:50 EDT --- Reverting to fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 also fixes the problem, so this really does look like a fontconfig regression or change of behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300239.n0U2dju8010382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476774 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300319.n0U3JK4N018300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert |[thaifonts-scalable] Please |thaifonts-scalable to new |convert to new font |font packaging guidelines |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300342.n0U3gk6W023588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300342.n0U3gMSX023485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 22:42:21 EDT --- Sample patch. Will modify sans and monospace if needed: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-compat-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 04:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300459.n0U4xZQV010561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there are families named 'basic' and 'book-basic' within this package. So changing the name in the suggested way would make the subpackages' name 'sil-gentium-basic-basic-fonts' and 'sil-gentium-basic-book-basic-fonts'. If that is fine, I would change the name as per the suggestion in Comment 19 and 20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 05:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300516.n0U5GmYu006546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 05:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300545.n0U5jrqS018805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #18 from Adam Goode 2009-01-30 00:45:52 EDT --- Would it be crazy to use FontForge at runtime to convert the TTF fonts into PFA fonts for each session? FontForge seems to be very fast at this. That way, we wouldn't need to ship any duplicate fonts at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477397] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300640.n0U6eY91021515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:40:33 EDT --- looks crazy to me but you can try, it's your package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300639.n0U6dnQv021010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll see it's perfectly possible to have one of the font subpackages named like the srpm (and in fact this is what the main gentium package is going to do) srpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts rpm: sil-gentium-basic-fonts sil-gentium-basic-fonts-common sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, would make it harder for reporters to find the right bugzilla component associated to the package)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300642.n0U6ggiZ029345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:42:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300643.n0U6hna3021851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-30 01:43:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300645.n0U6jtZ3022443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:45:54 EDT --- 1. if you have different font families, surely they declare different family names (or apps would not be able to select one instead of the other) ? 2. if they declare different family names, just use those names in the package naming 3. no proportional-gothic is not too long -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 07:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300755.n0U7t1xm002073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 02:55:01 EDT --- Thanks fixes the Japanese desktop problem for me. :) I still don't understand the discrepancy between monospace and sans... Behdad, any idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From roozbeh at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 08:27:47 2009 From: roozbeh at fedoraproject.org (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-doulos-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090130082747.2F84D70117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22263/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-doulos-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-3 - Cleanup, remove Provides (Nicholas Mailhot) * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-2 - Update to new F11 fonts policy, renaming from doulos-fonts --- NEW FILE import.log --- sil-doulos-fonts-4_104-3_fc11:HEAD:sil-doulos-fonts-4.104-3.fc11.src.rpm:1233303985 --- NEW FILE sil-doulos-fonts.spec --- %define fontname sil-doulos %define archivename DoulosSIL %define docversion 4.100 Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 4.104 Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Doulos SIL fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSILFont Source0: %{archivename}%{version}.zip BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel Requires: fontpackages-filesystem # Obsoleting and providing the old RPM name Obsoletes: doulos-fonts < 4.104-2 %description Doulos SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Doulos's design is similar to the design of the Times-like fonts, but only has a single regular face. It is intended for use alongside other Times-like fonts where a range of styles (italic, bold) are not needed. %prep %setup -q -n %{archivename} sed -i 's/\r$//' *.txt %build %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} %_font_pkg *.ttf %doc FONTLOG.txt OFL.txt OFL-FAQ.txt README.txt %doc DoulosSIL%{docversion}FontDocumentation.pdf %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-3 - Cleanup, remove Provides (Nicholas Mailhot) * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-2 - Update to new F11 fonts policy, renaming from doulos-fonts * Tue Jan 13 2009 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.104-1 - Update main font to 4.104 (with Unicode 5.1 support) - Remove Doulos Literacy (not maintained anymore) - Last update before conversion to new fonts policy * Tue Dec 11 2007 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.100-1 - Update main font to 4.100, keep old Doulos Literacy which is latest - Change license tag to OFL * Thu Nov 09 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.14-4 - Include Doulos Literacy - Don't include font cache files (fontconfig mechanism is changed) * Wed Nov 08 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.14-3 - Add dist tag * Wed Nov 08 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.14-2 - Rebuild to make package available in Rawhide again * Sat Feb 18 2006 Roozbeh Pournader - 4.0.14-1 - Initial packaging, based on gentium-fonts Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 30 Jan 2009 06:44:12 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 30 Jan 2009 08:27:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +DoulosSIL4.104.zip Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 30 Jan 2009 06:44:12 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 30 Jan 2009 08:27:16 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +b11373034e7e417b6e00b394c8da7f67 DoulosSIL4.104.zip From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300832.n0U8WdRB017807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 03:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (or sil-gentium-book-basic-fonts if you insist, This one won't work, use the other -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300910.n0U9A0En017574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-30 04:09:59 EDT --- If it didn't break some other things, then I'm going to build to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301027.n0UARp9q001278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #5 from Nils Philippsen 2009-01-30 05:27:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Basically our packaging guidelines really want you to locate fonts original > upstreams and package them in separate packages, IIUC, I should be able to gleam some info about the font files with the gnome-font-viewer program. The problem is: I can't find it and using strings is a bit unsatisfactory ;-/. Do you know where I can get this program? > but if you insist on > subpackaging your subpackages must conform to guidelines (and there are no > templates in that case because there is too much variability) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 10:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301050.n0UAof4E006431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 05:50:40 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_is_this_font_family_thing.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301109.n0UB9l6O019902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen 2009-01-30 06:09:46 EDT --- Hmm, so gnome-font-viewer doesn't exist and fontforge crashes: nils at gibraltar:~/devel/cvs/fedora/extremetuxracer/devel/extremetuxracer-0.4/data/fonts> fontforge PaperCuts20.ttf Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 00:23 GMT 28-Aug-2008. Library based on sources from 23:33 GMT 27-Aug-2008. Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault Anything else I can try? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301132.n0UBWJLk016191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-30 06:32:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 1. if you have different font families, surely they declare different family > names (or apps would not be able to select one instead of the other) ? > 2. if they declare different family names, just use those names in the package > naming > 3. no proportional-gothic is not too long well, author declares its family names, VL Gothic and VL PGothic though. just making a package name as vlgothic-vl-gothic-fonts and vlgothic-vl-pgothic-fonts is redundant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301139.n0UBdxhv017697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #24 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-30 06:39:58 EDT --- Ok. I have changed the naming. The new spec and srpm are at: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/temp/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts.spec http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/temp/sil-gentium-basic-fonts/sil-gentium-basic-fonts-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Not sure if it needs reapproval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301142.n0UBgJuq027533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-30 06:42:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I could lower the ranking of uming (Chinese fonts) by increasing the number of > the .conf file. > > Which side would you prefer to make the changes? VL Gothic, Uming, or > fontconfig? No options for VLGothic-fonts at least because this issue doesn't happen without cjkuni-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301330.n0UDUTnM013387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 08:30:29 EDT --- This is a known xorg bug, I though it was fixed, if your system is up-to-date ask our xorg guys what the workaround is (I don't remember it). Otherwise all those tools will do is permit direct access to font metadata, as the blurb says that's the same names that end in GUI font lists so you can always install your font files in fontconfig and just check what names appear in font lists then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301333.n0UDX9l2013885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 08:33:08 EDT --- if you follow the documented naming rules you'll end up with vlgothic-fonts as srpm name and vlgothic-fonts vlgothic-p-fonts vlgothic-fonts-common as subpackage names (assuming you don't use a foundry prefix, you're the judge if one is necessary or what it can be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301350.n0UDoROR027571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) | --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 08:50:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) screenshot again Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. Note that this screenshot is taken with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11 With reverting to fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 it goes _much_ better, however it does not remove this problem entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301403.n0UE3jhk031055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #49 from Baif 2009-01-30 09:03:43 EDT --- For KDE-LiveCD, the following .fonts.conf works! Caius, can you test it without the first part of "not_eq"? AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 8 12 false AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 11 17 false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301421.n0UELXj4026265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 09:21:32 EDT --- For record: # rpm -qf /etc/fonts/conf.d/* | sort | uniq VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11.noarch VLGothic-fonts-proportional-20081203-2.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11.i386 sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-6.20061016.fc11.noarch sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-6.20061016.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301444.n0UEi6G9031790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #50 from Baif 2009-01-30 09:44:04 EDT --- Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this conf, check if the Chinese are not antialias within the range. BTW: qtconfig-qt4 will ignore the fontconfig ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477488] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301503.n0UF33Wd004935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 10:03:01 EDT --- *** Bug 480481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480481] [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301503.n0UF32iH004916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 10:03:01 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477488 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301503.n0UF34q9004966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480481, which changed state. Bug 480481 Summary: [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301546.n0UFkNhM016432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-30 10:46:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: allgeyer-fonts Short Description: Musical Notation True Type Fonts Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 20:04:57 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090130200457.DDF4A70117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13182/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: 20090125 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- .cvsignore 16 Nov 2008 21:40:37 -0000 1.2 +++ .cvsignore 30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -heuristica-src-20081109.tar.bz2 +heuristica-src-20090125.tar.bz2 Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 17 Dec 2008 19:13:24 -0000 1.2 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ %define archivename heuristica-src-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 20081109 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 20090125 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Heuristica font Group: User Interface/X @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description -Heuristica is a serif latin & cyrillic font, derived from the "Adobe Utopia??" +Heuristica is a serif latin & cyrillic font, derived from the ???Adobe Utopia??? font that was released to the TeX Users Group under a liberal license. @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ %changelog +*Fri Jan 30 2009 +- 20090125-1 + * Sun Nov 23 2008 - 20081109-3 ??? ???rpm-fonts??? renamed to ???fontpackages??? Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 17 Dec 2008 19:13:24 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-1.fc11.src.rpm:1226871596 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.src.rpm:1229540973 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233345796 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sources 16 Nov 2008 21:40:37 -0000 1.2 +++ sources 30 Jan 2009 20:04:27 -0000 1.3 @@ -1 +1 @@ -05cba594f95ebdd6daa6d8c1c8ca42db heuristica-src-20081109.tar.bz2 +316d7eaf64b4deb8e39eaeed76eaf5d6 heuristica-src-20090125.tar.bz2 From nim at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 30 20:14:40 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.5, 1.6 xgridfit.spec, 1.7, 1.8 Message-ID: <20090130201440.7054770117@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15010/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec Log Message: 1.17 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- .cvsignore 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 +++ .cvsignore 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz +xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275 xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397 +xgridfit-1_17-1_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.17-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233346359 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- sources 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 +++ sources 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.6 @@ -1 +1 @@ -df07408852d577b1df37d4e4c1361735 xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz +82b4f14d1bb1fb89a38da0cff19cb05e xgridfit-1-17.tar.gz Index: xgridfit.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- xgridfit.spec 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.7 +++ xgridfit.spec 30 Jan 2009 20:14:09 -0000 1.8 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define archivever 1-11a +%define archivever 1-17 Name: xgridfit -Version: 1.11 -Release: 1.a%{?dist} +Version: 1.17 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Font hinting tool # This is where we drop fontforge @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Requires: %{_bindir}/xsltproc %description -Xgridfit is a high-level, XML-based language for gridfitting, or "hinting", +Xgridfit is a high-level, XML-based language for gridfitting, or ???hinting???, fonts. The Xgridfit program compiles an XML source file into tables and instructions that relate to the gridfitting of glyphs. Xgridfit does not insert these elements into a font itself, but rather relies on FontForge, the @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ %changelog +* Fri Jan 30 2009 +- 1.17-1 + * Fri Nov 14 2008 - 1.11-1.a ??? update for F11 cycle From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483329] New: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 Summary: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11.src.rpm => cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni => cjkuni-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11.src.rpm => cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/cjkuni [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^cjkuni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302038.n0UKc4Kd029604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-01-30 15:38:03 EDT --- => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ghostscript provided by: ghostscript-8.63-4.fc10.i386 /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483327] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk-ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302054.n0UKsLEa001770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302054.n0UKsLqT001792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302130.n0ULUvbG017483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 16:30:57 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is missing the %{_fontdir} line of the template 2. the gs stuff should probably be moved in a subpackage that depends on ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302132.n0ULWA31017880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 16:32:10 EDT --- (more accurately the %dir %{_fontdir} line) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302134.n0ULYj9o012428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 16:34:44 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is missing the %dir %{_fontdir} line of the official template 2. the gs stuff should probably be moved in a subpackage that depends on ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302228.n0UMSpRx031362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302228.n0UMSBw8031239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302229.n0UMTZN8031500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302228.n0UMSp5q031386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477337, which changed state. Bug 477337 Summary: gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302229.n0UMTanD031525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477335, which changed state. Bug 477335 Summary: doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302228.n0UMSCqX031275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Bug 477337 depends on bug 482985, which changed state. Bug 482985 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302229.n0UMTK2f024537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Bug 477335 depends on bug 482993, which changed state. Bug 482993 Summary: Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 22:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482993] Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302229.n0UMTJI3024508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482993 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302312.n0UNCtHp009333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302314.n0UNEACO009506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 04:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310454.n0V4s98J008032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 04:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310453.n0V4rnEN007954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 23:53:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) [details] > screenshot again > Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. What is the URL for that page? I could be wrong but it could be a Unihan issue with firefox not knowing what language the page is in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310501.n0V51bGx002693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-31 00:01:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) [details] [details] > > screenshot again > > Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. > > What is the URL for that page? Note that the glyph is wrong also on the other place (please look at gnome-panel in the picture: especially the glyph of "??" is apparently not Japanese) The URL is the same as the one in my comment 0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310622.n0V6MDql019703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 01:22:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330518) another screenshot This is what it currently looks like for me, but I will try with a fresh rawhide install soon. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 07:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310724.n0V7OAII007766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 02:24:10 EDT --- I just tried on a fresh rawhide install and it still looks good to me. Tasaka-san, perhaps could you try again? (Anyway unfortunately this fix/workaround won't be in F11Alpha anyway...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 08:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310823.n0V8NWh1018642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-31 03:23:32 EDT --- Well, after some investigation, it seems that when I hide (i.e. add 'dot' to the file name) 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf (in baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch) it looks good now (even with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310921.n0V9LNgU022820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-31 04:21:23 EDT --- Nothing much to say, this is a textbook simple font package that closely follows the template. Best practice nowadays is to use a summary that does not include the font name. Also, it seems there is a little more info on the font history in upstream's web page, it's always good to include it in description as long as it's limited to a few paragraphs. But all of this is nitpicking, the package itself is sane ??? APPROVED ??? I'll sponsor you so you can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a as soon as I see one or two other clean package submissions from you. Thank you for packaging a new font for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311015.n0VAF44r000839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:15:03 EDT --- would still appreciate some comment from Behdad... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311014.n0VAEVI5000455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:14:30 EDT --- Ah I see, thank you. Yes, baekmuk dotum is no longer installed by default, but sounds like a similar workaround is needed there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 11:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311113.n0VBDmnr019676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #11 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-31 06:13:47 EDT --- *** Bug 483313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 12:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311207.n0VC7Hju023085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #28 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-31 07:07:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (Anyway unfortunately this fix/workaround won't be in F11Alpha anyway...) I will push to F11 immediately when it is released. (In reply to comment #25) > Well, after some investigation, it seems that > when I hide (i.e. add 'dot' to the file name) > 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf (in baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch) > it looks good now (even with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11) Hmm, then I should also work on baekmuk then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 14:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483391] New: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #202400 +++ Description of problem: following glyphs are not present in Lohit Telugu U+0C3D ? TELUGU SIGN AVAGRAHA U+0C58 ? TELUGU LETTER TSA U+0C59 ? TELUGU LETTER DZA U+0C62 ? TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC L U+0C63 ? TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC LL U+0C78 ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ZERO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C79 ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7A ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7B ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7C ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7D ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7E ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7F ? TELUGU SIGN TUUMU Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10 Additional info: 1) http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-5.1/U51-0C00.pdf (chart showing new characters) 2) http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3116.pdf (proposal for adding these characters among others, that details the use of these characters) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311517.n0VFHOq1027266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 --- Comment #1 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-31 10:17:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330523) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330523) untested patch for Lohit-Telugu.sfd For reference, the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm already has all these characters. I am put up with an old Mandriva distro with pango-1.10.0-3mdk and fontforge-1.0-0.20050809.1mdk. I used the Lohit Telugu font extracted from lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm. I used the above fontforge (which cannot create or open the latest .sfd format), added some glyphs and created an old-format .sfd. Then I manually copied the changes to http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd and created the attached patch, which could hence be a bit unreliable. The changes made are: 1. Extra ligature rules in U0C1A_U0C4D.blwf and U0C1C_U0C4D.blwf for these glyphs to double-up as the below-base forms of U0C58 and U0C59. 2. New glyphs U0C58, U0C58_U0C3E.abvs, U0C58_U0C3F.abvs, U0C58_U0C40.abvs, U0C58_U0C46.abvs, U0C58_U0C47.abvs, U0C58_U0C4A.abvs, U0C58_U0C4B.abvs, U0C58_U0C4C.abvs, U0C58_U0C4D.haln created from the corresponding U0C1A_* glyphs by pasting the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf above them and trimming its length to match the extremities of the base character (ca/ja) in the glyphs. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf added above the glyphs only has integral coordinates in my patch. 3. New glyphs U0C59, U0C59_U0C3E.abvs, U0C59_U0C3F.abvs, U0C59_U0C40.abvs, U0C59_U0C46.abvs, U0C59_U0C47.abvs, U0C59_U0C4A.abvs, U0C59_U0C4B.abvs, U0C59_U0C4C.abvs, U0C59_U0C4D.haln, U0C59_U0C41.psts, U0C59_U0C42.psts created from the corresponding U0C1C_* glyphs by pasting the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf above them and trimming its length to match the extremities of the base character (ca/ja) in the glyphs. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf added above the glyphs only has integral coordinates in my patch. 4. "GlyphClass:" lines of the new glyphs are fixed to reflect if the glyph is a "ligature" (3) per my patch (attachment 330034) to bug 476427. "MultipleSubs2:" lines are added to the new glyphs U0C58 and U0C59 based on the corresponding lines in U0C1A and U0C1C although they don't make sense to me. 5. New glyphs U0C62, U0C63 created by using the U0C32_U0C4D.blwf shape in the background, pasting the shapes of U0C0C and U0C61 and moving & resizing them so that the top-left portion of them almost coincides with the background, and removing the background. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the glyphs only have integral coordinates in my patch. 6. "GlyphClass:" lines of these 2 glyphs are set to reflect they are "mark"s (4) per my patch (attachment 330034) to bug 476427. The "Width:" lines of these 2 glyphs are set based on their right extremity, like some of the non-zero width below-base forms. The avagraha & fractional digits are unrelated to existing shapes, so with my zero knowledge of designing fonts I don't know how to create them with a look & feel consistent with other glyphs. Note that "VWidth:" lines have not been changed from 819 although some of the new glyphs are much taller than that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 17:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311756.n0VHusEc028702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, palango at gmx.de Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 31 18:54:37 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel google-droid-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090131185437.7643F70119@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7944/devel Modified Files: google-droid-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: fix fontconfig links for sans and mono Index: google-droid-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/google-droid-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- google-droid-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 +++ google-droid-fonts.spec 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000 1.3 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts # The font files all have the same version except for sans fallback which I'm going to ignore here Version: 1.0.112 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android Group: User Interface/X @@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE13} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/59-%{fontname}-serif.conf -for fontconf in 59-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ - 59-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ +for fontconf in 65-%{fontname}-sans.conf \ + 60-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf \ 59-%{fontname}-serif.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fontconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fontconf @@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ %changelog +* Sat Jan 31 2009 +- 1.0.112-4 +??? fix-up fontconfig installation for sans and mono + * Fri Jan 16 2009 - 1.0.112-3 ??? Workaround RHEL5 rpmbuild UTF-8 handling bug Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/google-droid-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- import.log 16 Jan 2009 22:29:21 -0000 1.2 +++ import.log 31 Jan 2009 18:54:07 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-2_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-2.fc11.src.rpm:1232143809 google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-3_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232144541 +google-droid-fonts-1_0_112-4_fc11:HEAD:google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-4.fc11.src.rpm:1233428004 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901312051.n0VKpKtp020220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 20:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901312048.n0VKmduH019548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-31 15:48:39 EDT --- 1. You don't really need to specify the format in the summary 2. I'm quite sure that in all the German I can't read on the homepage and pdf there is some material to fatten up the description a bit. But, that's 100% nitpicking on my part. ??? APPROVED ??? And since you've proven twice you could read documentation and ask the right questions on the list, I'm also going to sponsor you. Please don't prove me wrong (as your sponsor I'm also here to help you should you have packaging problems later). You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging another Fedora font. It's a pleasure to do reviews where there is nothing really wrong, don't stop here :p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901312351.n0VNp62Z023595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-01-31 18:51:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts Short Description: A serif decorative latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 23:53:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901312353.n0VNrhLM031724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-01-31 18:53:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vollkorn-fonts Short Description: A serif latin font. Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.