From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 00:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462531] text of highlighted button in dialog goes black In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903010020.n210KLUv007563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462531 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 gary at garycmartin.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gary at garycmartin.com --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:06:48 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from gary at garycmartin.com 2009-02-28 19:20:18 EDT --- Just been testing build 20090227 from http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/ on an XO - all dialogues I tested displayed correctly, no black fill. Looking good here :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 06:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 01:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903010655.n216t689031340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 Dan Kenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on| |173897 Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Dan Kenigsberg 2009-03-01 01:55:04 EDT --- while I'm waiting for bug 173897 to help with this package renaming, would someone here care to see if what I checked into cvs fits the new standard? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 10:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 05:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] New: Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Summary: Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: apanov-edrip-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: bruno at wolff.to QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When upgrading from 20081007-6.fc11 to 20081007-7.fc11 I got an error message from yum while building the package list. Uninstalling and reinstalling, got by the problem. I lost the exact error message, but it referred to 8 bit bytes and text-factory. apanov-heuristica-fonts has the same issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 11:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011102.n21B2Mer003718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ffesti at redhat.com, | |james.antill at redhat.com, | |pmatilai at redhat.com, | |skvidal at sethdot.org, | |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Component|apanov-edrip-fonts |yum AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |skvidal at sethdot.org --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-01 06:02:21 EDT --- It's a yum bug. Yum chokes on rpmbuild-generated autoprovides (rpm itself is fine with them as a rpm -Uvh will show) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 11:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011109.n21B9Zkl004764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-01 06:09:34 EDT --- # yum --skip-broken -y update Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, post-transaction-actions, refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package apanov-edrip-fonts.noarch 0:20081007-7.fc11 set to be updated Error: You must not use 8-bit bytestrings unless you use a text_factory that can interpret 8-bit bytestrings (like text_factory = str). It is highly recommended that you instead just switch your application to Unicode strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 13:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011324.n21DOel0028378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-01 08:24:40 EDT --- wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 13:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011332.n21DWjT5002085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-01 08:32:43 EDT --- wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 16:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011646.n21Gk9QP002080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #17 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-03-01 11:46:07 EDT --- The two updates from today were rebuilt without the illegal font in the SRPM. They should land in the Fedora repositories soon. I'd be glad if someone wants to check that I didn't forget anything, as this is a legal issue and I wouldn't want to cause any trouble. I'll close the bug next week, when the updates are in the stable repositories for F-9 and F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 17:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480449] [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011741.n21HfAUe010442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-03-01 12:41:08 EDT --- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 17:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011741.n21HfBQ1010466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480449, which changed state. Bug 480449 Summary: [ember-media] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480449 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 01:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020147.n221lkfk014218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-01 20:47:45 EDT --- Thanks for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 02:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020257.n222vUwh024473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |jfearn at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-01 21:57:30 EDT --- We could update rawhide to depend on vlgothic-fonts rather than VLGothic-fonts, but that will probably just cause Jeff more trouble than help. So I think the package dep side of this bug is now done - however some updates might still be needed inside publican for the latest packaging changes so passing to Jeff to sign off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 07:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020729.n227TFRr003306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #10 from Shankar Prasad 2009-03-02 02:29:14 EDT --- Rahul, Any updates in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From hdu at openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 09:59:40 2009 From: hdu at openoffice.org (hdu at openoffice.org) Date: 2 Mar 2009 09:59:40 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090302095940.15761.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from hdu at openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 09:59:34 +0000 2009 ------- Looks good for 3.2... unless other high priorities like the Mac-Port, DrawingLayer rework, BiDi+CTL issues, Vista issues, bad but subtle regressions introduced by fontconfig- and cairo-integration, I18N issues etc. get in the way again... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From softadm at openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 10:41:28 2009 From: softadm at openoffice.org (softadm at openoffice.org) Date: 2 Mar 2009 10:41:28 -0000 Subject: [Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090302104128.5429.qmail@openoffice.org> To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 ------- Additional comments from softadm at openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 10:41:22 +0000 2009 ------- Big hads hdu ;-) This sounds really good. This issue is too old in order to further postpone it. Many, many, many thank in advance, Wolfgang --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 13:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021345.n22DjpO7020438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477473, which changed state. Bug 477473 Summary: [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 13:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021345.n22DjnGw020413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Tomas Smetana changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Tomas Smetana 2009-03-02 08:45:47 EDT --- Switched to liberation-fonts for the tvtime GUI as the lesser evil of all the choices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 14:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021444.n22EiWxP025459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 seth vidal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svidal at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(bruno at wolff.to) --- Comment #3 from seth vidal 2009-03-02 09:44:31 EDT --- can you show all the versions of: python sqlite python-sqlite yum rpm installed on your system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 15:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021559.n22FxJng016110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Bruno Wolff III changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bruno at wolff.to) | --- Comment #4 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-03-02 10:59:17 EDT --- I have updated some stuff since then and am not sure the current versions are the same as the ones I was using then. (They might be though as I have had several attempts at finishing the updates after the mass rebuild thwarted by file conflicts.) python-2.6-4.fc11.x86_64 yum-3.2.21-11.fc11.noarch rpm-4.6.0-11.fc11.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.10-3.fc11.i386 sqlite-3.6.10-3.fc11.x86_64 package python-sqlite is not installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 16:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021605.n22G5Znu009365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-03-02 11:05:32 EDT --- After looking around I think maybe you meant to ask about python-sqlite2-2.3.3-5.fc11.x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 16:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021607.n22G7UxB009743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #6 from James Antill 2009-03-02 11:07:30 EDT --- I upgraded yum and rpm first ... but I had no problem upgrading the fonts as part of a mass update, or on their own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 16:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021607.n22G7unB018538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hcmeyer at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from James Antill 2009-03-02 11:07:53 EDT --- *** Bug 488058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 16:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021656.n22Gu7Bo028326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #8 from Herbert Carl Meyer 2009-03-02 11:56:06 EDT --- thanks james, version info later. problem is package related or yum ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 17:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021728.n22HSaiP026226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #9 from seth vidal 2009-03-02 12:28:36 EDT --- unclear. Nicholas, I can replicate this - but it is ONLY on the upgrade from -6 to -7 of apanov-edrip-fonts. I'll try to track it back to see where the problem is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 18:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021810.n22IACZN002373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-02 13:10:11 EDT --- -6 and -7 are the only edrip versions built with an rpm that includes font autoprovides magic (as I noted in comment #1). Edrip and Heuristica are also currently our only fonts where upstream uses non-ascii font metadata. I suppose both of those trigger a yum bug Panu didn't notice when he did his coding (rpm itself seems fine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 18:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021828.n22ISYOC015775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #11 from seth vidal 2009-03-02 13:28:32 EDT --- okay, a little more debugging. So the font provides being generated. One of them appears to be a unicode string. However, when I get it back from rpm-python from the hdr object it is being reported as a string object - is there something I'm missing in between? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 19:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021951.n22JpO7H001456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #12 from Herbert Carl Meyer 2009-03-02 14:51:23 EDT --- Package related, if I exclude the apanov fonts, I can upgrade everything else. Versions: python-2.6-5.fc11.i586 sqlite-3.6.10-4.fc11.i586 python-sqlite2-2.3.3-6.fc11.i586 yum-3.2.21-11.fc11.noarch rpm-4.6.0-11fc11.i586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From kevin at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 2 19:57:51 2009 From: kevin at fedoraproject.org (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontforge/devel sources, 1.24, 1.25 .cvsignore, 1.24, 1.25 fontforge.spec, 1.42, 1.43 Message-ID: <20090302195751.9E44270115@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: kevin Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25954 Modified Files: sources .cvsignore fontforge.spec Log Message: Upgrade to 20090224 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25 --- sources 21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000 1.24 +++ sources 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.25 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -eb00467bff69b15a4137595c16cdbff5 fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2 -476b047dc6cdc36d79ac34da1c3fcb58 fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2 +5b564437e5e3db660b0202647b6f733b fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2 +fdd4420934fe12575e7240642c0ffbe4 fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.24 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25 --- .cvsignore 21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 -0000 1.24 +++ .cvsignore 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.25 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2 -fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2 +fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2 +fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2 Index: fontforge.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v retrieving revision 1.42 retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43 --- fontforge.spec 24 Feb 2009 17:48:41 -0000 1.42 +++ fontforge.spec 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 -0000 1.43 @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} -%global docs_version 20081224 +%global docs_version 20090224 %global gettext_package FontForge Name: fontforge -Version: 20081224 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 20090224 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Outline and bitmap font editor Group: Applications/Publishing @@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %changelog +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Kevin Fenzi - 20090224-1 +- Upgrade to 20090224 + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20081224-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 21:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022152.n22Lq4dn027387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-02 16:52:02 EDT --- Built in rawhide and old package marked dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 21:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022152.n22Lq5Gq027420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Bug 477401 depends on bug 486269, which changed state. Bug 486269 Summary: Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 22:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487593] crash changing language in gdm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022201.n22M1i50029725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-02 17:01:40 EDT --- Will hit rawhide tonight or tomorrow. commit 14fe6f79c37d83863e8fcc092b42233db3ad9760 Author: Behdad Esfahbod Date: Tue Mar 3 01:30:03 2009 +0330 [pangofc-fontmap] Don't unref NULL object (RH bug# 487593) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 22:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022221.n22MLdkb001415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #13 from seth vidal 2009-03-02 17:21:38 EDT --- okay, I've been mucking with this for a good portion of the day. There are two problems here: 1. it looks like rpm is generating an encoded string as a provide 2. rpm-python appears to be claiming it is a string object Additionally the provides generated by the fontprov script are; config(apanov-edrip-fonts) = 20081007-7.fc11 font(:lang=ava) font(:lang=be) font(:lang=bg) font(:lang=ce) font(:lang=fj) font(:lang=ho) font(:lang=ia) font(:lang=ie) font(:lang=ik) font(:lang=io) font(:lang=kum) font(:lang=kv) font(:lang=lez) font(:lang=mn-mn) font(:lang=ms) font(:lang=nr) font(:lang=om) font(:lang=os) font(:lang=ru) font(:lang=rw) font(:lang=sel) font(:lang=sh) font(:lang=so) font(:lang=sr) font(:lang=ss) font(:lang=st) font(:lang=sw) font(:lang=ts) font(:lang=uk) font(:lang=xh) font(:lang=zu) font(edrip) font(?????) apanov-edrip-fonts = 20081007-7.fc11 Do we really want an '=' in the name section of a provide? I kinda hope we do not. I think the provides script needs some love and I think we need to figure out what rpm-python is doing with the objects it is getting. Panu, Florian, Jindrich comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 22:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022218.n22MI6Oq000590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Depends on| |212079 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-02 17:18:04 EDT --- Thank you very much for working on this. Here is a first review pass: 1. FPC and FESCO have decided %global was preferred over %define. The changes are in fontpackages 1.20, please apply them http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define 2. Please try to keep the same declaration order as the templates, that makes diffing & reviewing easier 3. Please do not make a metapackage of the main package, if you need a metapackage for upgrade paths create a -compat subpackage that we'll be able to kill at F12 time http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Can.27t_I_use_my_old_package_name_instead_of_a_-compat_subpackage.3F vera, mgopen, dejavu, liberation, etc all use this proven pattern 4. you can probably drop the Obsoletes: freefont-ttf < %{version}-%{release} freefont has been named freefont in Fedora for quite a long time 5. In rawhide you can drop the Group: User Interface/X declarations in subpackages 6. use the %package -n %{fontname}--fonts %description -n %{fontname}--fonts %_font_pkg -n -f %{fontconf}-.conf *.ttf which is documented in the templates if you want stuff to actually work 7. put doc in the common package, that's one of its main uses 8. BuildRequire fontforge 9. You'll likely hit http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html too 10. Please add fontconfig rules to each font subpackages. In your case that's probably just taking the /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf template and filling in font names 11. Please also make sure you've not forgotten a step in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes That's all I see right now, I may have missed something else, multi-font packages can be trickier than mono-font ones. But first fix this please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 22:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022255.n22Mtwco007660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |richard at hughsie.com --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-02 17:55:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > okay, I've been mucking with this for a good portion of the day. There are two > problems here: > > 1. it looks like rpm is generating an encoded string as a provide Since the autoprovides stuff extracts metadata from the font files, and I don't think any font format spec mandates this metadata must be ASCII only, this is pretty much required to work with font files. > 2. rpm-python appears to be claiming it is a string object This is probably the bug > Additionally the provides generated by the fontprov script are; > > config(apanov-edrip-fonts) = 20081007-7.fc11 > font(:lang=ava) ... > font(edrip) > font(?????) This font file declares two names, one ASCII and the other ? not. This is an upstream choice. Each of the names can be referenced in a digital document, wo we can't really drop it if we want autoinstall to work. > apanov-edrip-fonts = 20081007-7.fc11 > > > Do we really want an '=' in the name section of a provide? I kinda hope we do > not. Behdad really liked this syntax, it's very close to the kind of options every fontconfig command knows how to process. Since it was properly enclosed in a font() namespace Panu and Richard let it be. > I think the provides script needs some love It's not a script it's a binary that was coded for packaging systems such as rpm/pk The problem I have with that any syntax change requires a rebuild of all the packages providing fonts before the next release (including beasts like OO.o) and I'd really like not to do one every other week. > and I think we need to figure out > what rpm-python is doing with the objects it is getting. > > Panu, Florian, Jindrich comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 23:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022343.n22NhOoW016592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 23:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022343.n22NhMwT016543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477387 Depends on| |173897 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(danken at cs.technio | |n.ac.il) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-02 18:43:20 EDT --- First review pass (builds in mock, good) 1. various rpmlint warnings, of which only the following need to be fixed culmus-fancy-fonts.src: E: invalid-spec-name culmus-fancy-fonts.src:84: E: files-attr-not-set A file or a directory entry in a %files section does not have attributes set which may result in security issues in the resulting binary package depending on the system where the package is built. Add default attributes using %defattr before it in the %files section, or use per line %attr's. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:157: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:158: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:159: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:160: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:161: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:162: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src:163: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. culmus-fancy-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty. fonts-hebrew-fancy-compat.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Compatibility files of Culmus fancy font families. Summary ends with a dot. 2. please use OTF over Type1 whenever possible 3. a. we prefer for fonts released in different archives to be packaged separately (different rpms and srpms). b. also, I don't think Legal would appreciate the way you drop every licensing file but one. c. lastly, the different fonts actually have different timestamps so your version is misleading However there is a tolerance for fonts that used to be packaged in a single srpm so you may avail yourself of it if you really want to. Still, I don't think that's a good idea. 7 simple packages can be easier to manage than a monster one (and are actually quicker to review) 4. It would be a good idea to contact upstream and make it add the FSF font exception to their licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Good_font_licenses_allow_embedding 5. the rpm in rawhide allows you to drop the duplicate Group declarations in subpackages 6. FPC and FESCO have decided %define-s should be replaced by %global-s (cf fontpackages-devel 1.20) 7. You do not need this Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-dorian-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-gan-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-gladia-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts < %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{fontname}-anka-fonts < %{version}-%{release} 8. You should not need this Provides: fonts-hebrew-fancy = %{version}-%{release} 9. Please only obsolete the last version of fonts-hebrew-fancy built in koji + 1 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages 10. Your compat subpackage need not require common, it'll be pulled in by the others 11. You're supposed to add something specific to each font subpackage under %common_desc references. Likewise your summaries are all identical, that's not user-friendly 12. You do not need the %dir %{_fontdir} line anymore 13. since your fontconfig files define substitution rules, it's probably a good idea to use /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf as template 14. the spec is slightly easier to review if you keep the same line order as the template so diffs are minimal ? need a little more work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 04:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030458.n234wqdD009512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lyos Gemini Norezel 2009-03-02 23:58:51 EDT --- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 04:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030458.n234wrZ6009536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477466, which changed state. Bug 477466 Summary: [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 05:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030522.n235MRLj013293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 Lyos Gemini Norezel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lyos Gemini Norezel 2009-03-03 00:22:26 EDT --- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 05:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030522.n235MSJD013318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477334, which changed state. Bug 477334 Summary: [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 07:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 02:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030731.n237Vw3j021516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-03 02:31:57 EDT --- I started working on that. Found some smaller problems which I try to resolve: * tuffy rpm did not built for me on F11 as well. fontforge complained about $argc in the while loop - probably some escaping issue. I worked around this by extracting the fontforge script for now. * The /usr/share path for tuffy in tgcaptcha is wrong because it's now tulrich-tuffy * We need to delete to ttf files from the tgcaptcha tar.gz before building, otherwise they will be still included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 08:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030827.n238RfwF031203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-03 03:27:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I started working on that. Found some smaller problems which I try to resolve: > * tuffy rpm did not built for me on F11 as well. fontforge complained about > $argc in the while loop - probably some escaping issue. I worked around this by > extracting the fontforge script for now. http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 08:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030838.n238cAVP011850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Richard Hughes 2009-03-03 03:38:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Do we really want an '=' in the name section of a provide? I kinda hope we do > not. Why not? I don't see how '=' is any different from '-' in this sense. > 2. rpm-python appears to be claiming it is a string object I think that's the bug also. (In reply to comment #14) > The problem I have with that any syntax change requires a rebuild of all the > packages providing fonts before the next release (including beasts like OO.o) > and I'd really like not to do one every other week. I second that -- we shouldn't be rebuilding everything again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 14:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:41:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903031441.n23EfV5C019976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 14:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903031456.n23Eu7dx014066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Unable to upgrade to |Unable to upgrade |20081007-7.fc11, but fresh |apanov-edrip-fonts, due to |install worked |i18n provide issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 17:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903031754.n23HsN5k025415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #16 from seth vidal 2009-03-03 12:54:22 EDT --- Just to make everything sideways: It looks like this is a conversion issue somewhere. if I localupdate the pkg in question it works. Getting the metadata from the repodata is where it all goes horribly wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 18:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903031812.n23ICC7C005176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #17 from seth vidal 2009-03-03 13:12:10 EDT --- Adding a bit more detail. This problem does not surface if: 1. the older pkg is not installed and you are only installing the pkg 2. the newer pkg is being installed from a localpkg Which suggests it's the process of traversing the provides coming out of the rpmdb for the older pkg which is tripping it up. this note is mostly for my own sanity, no other comments needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 04:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488398] New: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Summary: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: htl10 at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: /usr/share/ghostscript/conf.d/*map.zh_* refers to *.ttf instead of *.ttc, causing printing or viewing of cjk pdf without embedded cjk fonts to not work. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10.noarch Additional info: This seems to be an small oversight of the packager when the unifonts changes from ttf in 0.1.x to ttc in 0.2.x ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 05:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903040539.n245dIoo013855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #11 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-04 00:39:15 EDT --- Shankar, this is same as 479100. Similar fix will be released in next lohit version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 14:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450699] lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041412.n24EC1tl016442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-04 09:11:58 EDT --- I am patching the font file for proper combination with 0bb6, but it wont work unless the corresponding patch for pango is commited. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 20:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903042042.n24Kghcl016670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-04 15:42:42 EDT --- I've posted a note to the fonts list to discuss this. Perhaps we should close this bug and continue discussion on that list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 21:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903042107.n24L7uOh002787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-04 16:07:53 EDT --- ok, so this is open to try and address the crashing in frontforge when it's lied to about what fonts are available? :) I can bring the issue up upstream and see if they can come up with a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 06:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 01:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] New: fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Summary: fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: mclroy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Prior to the last system update fontforge worked just fine. After the update no key strike has *any* affect! In the update the packages on the list were updated: [root at ex ~]# grep "yum: " /var/log/messages Mar 4 07:07:36 ex yum: Updated: selinux-policy-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:07:43 ex yum: Installed: system-config-date-1.9.36-1.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:07:46 ex yum: Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:07:50 ex yum: Installed: system-config-date-docs-1.0.5-1.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:08:54 ex yum: Updated: selinux-policy-targeted-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:08:57 ex yum: Updated: selinux-policy-doc-3.5.13-46.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:09:23 ex yum: Updated: kernel-doc-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.noarch Mar 4 07:10:26 ex yum: Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.i686 Mar 4 07:10:29 ex yum: Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:10:33 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:10:33 ex yum: Updated: audit-libs-1.7.12-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:10:35 ex yum: Updated: gtkhtml3-3.24.5-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:10:39 ex yum: Updated: evolution-data-server-2.24.5-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:23 ex yum: Updated: evolution-2.24.5-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:24 ex yum: Updated: 1:cups-libs-1.3.9-8.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:24 ex yum: Updated: SDL-1.2.13-7.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:25 ex yum: Updated: linuxwacom-0.8.0.3-8.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:26 ex yum: Updated: libgxim-0.3.2-3.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:28 ex yum: Updated: anthy-9100h-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:36 ex yum: Updated: 1:cups-1.3.9-8.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:36 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-gphoto2-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:36 ex yum: Updated: xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.6.3-3.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:37 ex yum: Updated: audit-libs-python-1.7.12-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:42 ex yum: Updated: evolution-help-2.24.5-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:43 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-smb-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:43 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-archive-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:43 ex yum: Updated: evolution-perl-2.24.5-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:44 ex yum: Updated: alsa-utils-1.0.19-2.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:45 ex yum: Updated: audit-1.7.12-1.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:45 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-fuse-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:45 ex yum: Updated: gvfs-obexftp-1.0.3-6.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:11:46 ex yum: Updated: sweep-0.9.3-4.fc10.i386 Mar 4 07:12:05 ex yum: Installed: kernel-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.i686 Mar 4 07:12:47 ex yum: Installed: kernel-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.i686 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. update your system 2. launch fontforge 3. strike any key/key combination. Actual results: No key/"key combination"/hotkey works. Expected results: Keys shall work. Additional info: No error messages. I don't think the bug has common ground with the bug 462038. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 06:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 01:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050629.n256Trxx021790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-05 01:29:51 EDT --- I strongly suspect: Mar 4 07:11:26 ex yum: Updated: libgxim-0.3.2-3.fc10.i386 Can you apply the update from: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgxim-0.3.2-4.fc10 and see if that fixes it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 07:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050711.n257Bodx025206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #2 from Michael 2009-03-05 02:11:49 EDT --- Mar 5 10:06:09 ex yum: Updated: libgxim-0.3.2-4.fc10.i386 No change. It doesn.t help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 09:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466404] Segmentation fault. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050944.n259i3lR010440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466404 --- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen 2009-03-05 04:44:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ok, so this is open to try and address the crashing in frontforge when it's > lied to about what fonts are available? :) > > I can bring the issue up upstream and see if they can come up with a fix. Yes, that'd be good and very appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rbhalera at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 5 14:13:18 2009 From: rbhalera at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Bhalerao) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/lohit-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 lohit-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 sources, 1.9, 1.10 Message-ID: <20090305141318.E057C70116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: rbhalera Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19490 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-fonts.spec sources Log Message: New bugfixed version: lohit-fonts-2.3.8 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- .cvsignore 9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -0000 1.9 +++ .cvsignore 5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -0000 1.10 @@ -1 +1 @@ -lohit-fonts-2.3.1.tar.gz +lohit-fonts-2.3.8.tar.gz Index: lohit-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- lohit-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 20:57:00 -0000 1.11 +++ lohit-fonts.spec 5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -0000 1.12 @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.3.1 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 2.3.8 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -33,6 +33,17 @@ This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. +%package -n %{fontname}-assamese-fonts +Summary: Free Assamese font +Group: User Interface/X +Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} + +%description -n %{fontname}-assamese-fonts +%common_desc +This package provides a free Assamese truetype/opentype font. + +%_font_pkg -n assamese lohit_as.ttf + %package -n %{fontname}-bengali-fonts Summary: Free Bengali font Group: User Interface/X @@ -256,6 +267,16 @@ %changelog + +* Thu Mar 05 2009 Rahul Bhalerao - 2.3.8-1.fc11 +- Bug 428427 - [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering +- Bug 450699 - [ta_IN]Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font (fixed in font, needs rendering update) +- Bug 476427 - [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in + lohit-telugu font +- Bug 479100 - [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly +- Bug 483530 - [bn_IN]Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support +- Added Lohit-Assamese + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.3.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.9 retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 --- sources 9 Sep 2008 12:08:11 -0000 1.9 +++ sources 5 Mar 2009 14:12:48 -0000 1.10 @@ -1 +1 @@ -ca26218fc6323633210c674fe9e2f9d2 lohit-fonts-2.3.1.tar.gz +f3b5c3cd8e370f1669d44cec3eab1f2b lohit-fonts-2.3.8.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051423.n25ENC2S031552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-05 09:23:11 EDT --- Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483530] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051425.n25EPhMM015883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-05 09:25:42 EDT --- Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. Added the necessary glyphs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450699] [ta_IN] Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051424.n25EOukV031904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450699 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Summary|lohit-fonts: Errors in "sh" |[ta_IN] Errors in "sh" and |and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil |"shrI" in Lohit Tamil font |font | --- Comment #5 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-05 09:24:55 EDT --- Font fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. Please wait for an update in pango for final resolve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051432.n25EWE5A000360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-05 09:32:13 EDT --- Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. (lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1) Padmanabhan, I tried using your patch. Unfortunately it did not work. Baiscally the solution involved two simple changes, 1.Changing the lookup properties for 'ignore marks' at one place 2.Changing the glyph type for all the 'blwf' forms of consonants to 'Mark' from 'BaseGlyph'. Thanks for the work you did on this bug. Your analysis has helped a lot in fixing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483530] [bn_IN] Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051435.n25EZ61v017082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483530 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Lohit Bengali font cheating |[bn_IN] Lohit Bengali font |about character support |cheating about character | |support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 14:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051436.n25EaXQ2001218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-05 09:36:32 EDT --- Fixed in lohit-fonts-2.3.8. (lohit-kannada-fonts-2.3.8-1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051602.n25G2GaI014528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479238] please update to latest release (20090104) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051602.n25G2F1Q014495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Depends on| |486977, 47336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051655.n25GtNnu023974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-05 11:55:23 EDT --- Corrected all but 9. Can't test if 9 is needed in rawhide as mock builds are failing at the yum step with 404s, even with a fresh root cache. Probably a temporary issue. rel-eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1225 Otherwise I *think * I hit all your points. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 18:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051835.n25IZ9Cc011839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-05 13:35:09 EDT --- Odd. Are you 100% sure you restarted fontforge after the above update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 18:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051845.n25IjjIO029408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-05 13:45:44 EDT --- Sorted out mock. Yup, it needs -lang=ff. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 19:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051942.n25Jgs4e009890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #4 from Michael 2009-03-05 14:42:53 EDT --- [root at ex ~]# uptime 22:31:03 up 4 min, 3 users, load average: 0.42, 0.44, 0.20 [root at ex ~]# rpm -qa | grep "libgxim\|fontforge" fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.i386 libgxim-0.3.2-4.fc10.i386 [root at ex ~]# I have even restarted the OS. No change. Well. I lied from the start. It seems that Shift and Alt work actually. Though no other key works. No Ctrl-S, Ctrl-Z, or Alt-Ctrl-Shift-+, etc. The mouse still works well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052014.n25KEB4v000975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #5 from Michael 2009-03-05 15:14:11 EDT --- I mean Shift and Alt work with the mouse but not in combination with other keys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052014.n25KExqV001082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477416, which changed state. Bug 477416 Summary: [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052014.n25KEwqD001056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |caolanm at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-05 15:14:57 EDT --- Taking silence as agreement. Updated to 2.12.2 as well, and FTBFS graciously fixed by Caol?n McNamara. Fixed in rawhide, added to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052013.n25KDwPr000911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-05 15:13:58 EDT --- We're getting there :) 1. you still have at least one %define in common_desc (probably did not notice it because you've reordered the template) 2.you still have a needless group declaration in your common package 3. you should simplify your subpackage names (for example use %{fontname}-mono-fonts instead of %{fontname}-freemono-fonts). Repeating the project name does not really help users. 4. you need to drop Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: freefont < 20090104-2 from your main package 5. you probably don't need to obsolete package names that were never pushed to user systems, this obsolete data will never be used 6. you don't need %dir %{_fontdir} in your common package 7. you can unroll the for loop, but if you do so make sure you don't reference the for variable anymore 8. your fontconfig rule filenames need to start with a number to work (in your case 60 is probably fine, see /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt) 9. your fontconfig rules won't work if you just put the font name everywhere blindly. See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt and /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052053.n25Krjme025546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-05 15:53:44 EDT --- Better? SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 21:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052158.n25LwmmQ022100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-03-05 16:58:47 EDT --- Sorry I didn't respond, I missed the mail. To be honest I wouldn't have said much helpful anyway, tex font packaging is a mess. I am starting to think about how to sort it out and putting a proposal together as part of a concerted effort to rationalize tex packaging in general. But, real life is making this a slow goal. sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 22:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479238] please update to latest release (freefont-ttf-20090104) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052254.n25Ms3PW000440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|please update to latest |please update to latest |release (20090104) |release | |(freefont-ttf-20090104) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 00:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:07:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: "in Firefox") In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060007.n2607vVa015206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Severity|high |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 00:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060012.n260CA8U015959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-05 19:12:09 EDT --- *** Bug 479238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 00:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060011.n260BMvr015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 00:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479238] please update to latest release (freefont-ttf-20090104) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060012.n260CAJI015931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-05 19:12:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486977 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 00:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060042.n260g5Dj020300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-05 19:42:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > 4. you need to drop > Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} > from your main package But they should be moved to the compat package. > 5. you probably don't need to obsolete package names that were never pushed to > user systems, this obsolete data will never be used Right, I think you can drop "Obsoletes: gnu-free-fonts < 20090104-4" from compat too. Otherwise it looks pretty good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 08:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 03:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060842.n268gxn5030612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176 Ani Peter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(apeter at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Ani Peter 2009-03-06 03:42:58 EDT --- Rahul, Apologies for replying late. This works perfect. Screenshot attached. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 08:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 03:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060843.n268hlgt013463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176 --- Comment #5 from Ani Peter 2009-03-06 03:43:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=334268) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334268) Screenshot from the present font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 08:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 03:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445176] [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060847.n268l9ZI031348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-06 03:47:09 EDT --- Ani, thanks for confirming, closing this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 21:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 16:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903062150.n26LohHr021697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-06 16:50:41 EDT --- I'm at a loss what could have happened... fontforge in f10 hasn't changed in quite a while. ;( Can you get the older version of libgxim from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=67227 and do a 'rpm -Uvh libgxim*.rpm --oldpackage --replacepkgs' on it to go back to that version, then restart fontforge and see if it's working? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 08:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903070806.n2786Xcl025978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-07 03:06:33 EDT --- think i finally got it.. :D packages: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec Do i need to mention anything anywhere about that edge error ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 08:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903070827.n278RRln017606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|seg at haxxed.com |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-07 03:27:25 EDT --- I got ACL for this package and I made an attempt to separate the fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1228226 There are 3 .pfa fonts in this package are, two of them are derived from lilypond's feta fonts and 1 is derived from lilypond's parmesan fonts. It is fairly difficult to produce these .pfa files from source .mf files. Two of these fonts can be converted from .pfb files (that are available in lilypond builds) to .pfa files, but unfortunately lilypond's current tarball doesn't contain the sources for the last font (feta-nummer10) anymore. Note that lilypond only offers .pfb files and no .pfa files. I also saw that the glyph names are modified from the original lilypond source files. Well, maybe the names of these glyphs were so in an older version of lilypond. So, there is a tiny possibility that if we were to use the current lilypond fonts, rosegarden might misbehave. Hence I made two subpackages rosegarden4-feta-fonts (contains 2 .pfa files) rosegarden4-parmesan-fonts (contains 1 .pfa file) Let me know if I need to do any other changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 15:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903071524.n27FOppY022571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #7 from Michael 2009-03-07 10:24:50 EDT --- This one: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/libgxim-0.3.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm [root at ex libgxim]# rpm -Uvh --oldpackage libgxim-0.3.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:libgxim ########################################### [100%] [root at ex libgxim]# Restarting just fontforge didn't help. I had to restart the OS: [root at ex ~]# uptime 18:00:45 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 2.20, 0.88, 0.32 [root at ex ~]# rpm -qi libgxim Name : libgxim Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.3.1 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 1.fc10 Build Date: Thu 23 Oct 2008 05:02:13 PM MSD Install Date: Sat 07 Mar 2009 05:22:44 PM MSK Build Host: xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: libgxim-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Size : 393586 License: LGPLv2+ Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 29 Oct 2008 06:58:58 AM MSK, Key ID bf226fcc4ebfc273 Packager : Fedora Project URL : http://code.google.com/p/libgxim/ Summary : GObject-based XIM protocol library Well. Now it works. My fontforge is back! What's next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 16:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903071648.n27GmuOa002271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-07 11:48:54 EDT --- I checked this package and I certify that it obeys the new font guidelines. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 16:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903071648.n27GmuMF002292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477395, which changed state. Bug 477395 Summary: [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 18:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 489109] New: Python scripts don't work with fontforge Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Python scripts don't work with fontforge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489109 Summary: Python scripts don't work with fontforge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: kevin at tummy.com ReportedBy: felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Python bindings for fontforge don't work, importing the fontforge module fails on a 32 bit F11 rawhide system. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontforge-20090224-1.fc11.i586 Steps to Reproduce: python -c 'import fontforge' Actual results: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in SystemError: Missing library: libgunicode Expected results: No output (=> fontforge library could be imported and is ready to use in Python) Additional info: /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3[.0.1] is present but there is no symlink from /usr/lib/libgunicode.so. The same holds true for libgutils.so and libfontforge.so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 20:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903072008.n27K80jl012735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |489117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 20:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903072007.n27K7Lla002119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #10 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-07 15:07:20 EDT --- I filed bug 489117 to get the tuffy fonts into Fedora. In the meanwhile, I updated python-tgcaptcha. New SRPM is online: http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2009/tgcaptcha/review/python-tgcaptcha-0.11-6.fc11.src.rpm When/if tuffy is in Fedora, I can update CVS for python-tgcaptcha. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 22:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:57:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488675] fontforge ignores keyboard input since last system update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903072257.n27MvZO1026964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, tagoh at redhat.com Component|fontforge |libgxim AssignedTo|kevin at tummy.com |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-07 17:57:34 EDT --- I'm reassigning this to libgxim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 01:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489109] Python scripts don't work with fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090102.n2912rqQ005919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489109 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-08 21:02:52 EDT --- Looks like debian is shipping a patch for this issue. Upstream is trying to dlopen the .so file it wants manually. Unfortunately the debian solution needs more work to work for us, as they hardcode lib in there and we need lib or lib64. ;( I will try and come up with a patch soon. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 04:12:07 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 04:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090309041207.37E8270116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29656 Modified Files: icelandic-fonts.spec Log Message: use font_pkg macro again Index: icelandic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- icelandic-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 06:39:21 -0000 1.4 +++ icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:11:36 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Icelandic Magical Staves Group: User Interface/X @@ -47,14 +47,13 @@ %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || : fi -%files -%defattr(644,root,root,755) -%dir %{_fontdir} -%{_fontdir}/*.otf -%doc README.license +%_font_pkg *.otf %changelog +* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley - 1.001-6 +- Use font_pkg macro again + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.001-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 04:15:32 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 04:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090309041532.7862270116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30927 Modified Files: icelandic-fonts.spec Log Message: fix having post in specfile Index: icelandic-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:11:36 -0000 1.5 +++ icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:15:02 -0000 1.6 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.001 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Icelandic Magical Staves Group: User Interface/X @@ -37,20 +37,13 @@ %clean rm -fr %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || : -fi - -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || : -fi - %_font_pkg *.otf %changelog +* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley - 1.001-7 +- Fix including %%post in here from last fix + * Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley - 1.001-6 - Use font_pkg macro again From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 04:40:51 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 04:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090309044051.19C1070116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4193 Modified Files: brettfont-fonts.spec Log Message: update to new packaging guidelines Index: brettfont-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/brettfont-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- brettfont-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 05:49:03 -0000 1.4 +++ brettfont-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:40:20 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@ -%define fontname brettfont -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontname brettfont Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080506 @@ -13,47 +11,42 @@ Source0: BrettFont1.1.ttf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A handwriting font made by Brett Alton. + %prep %build %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 644 %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/brettfont.ttf +rm -fr %{buildroot} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/brettfont.ttf %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi +%_font_pkg *.ttf - -%files -%defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc -%dir %{fontdir}/ -%{fontdir}/*.ttf + +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley - 20080506-5 +- Update to new packaging guidelines + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20080506-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild @@ -71,3 +64,4 @@ * Mon May 05 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-1 - Initial package + From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 04:42:25 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 04:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel brettfont-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090309044225.29D2B70119@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4628 Modified Files: brettfont-fonts.spec Log Message: actually bump release, not just make changelog entry for it :) Index: brettfont-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/brettfont-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- brettfont-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:40:20 -0000 1.5 +++ brettfont-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:41:54 -0000 1.6 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20080506 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: A handwriting font Group: User Interface/X From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 05:06:48 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 05:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel roadstencil-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6 Message-ID: <20090309050648.E104170116@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11016 Modified Files: roadstencil-fonts.spec Log Message: update to new guidelines Index: roadstencil-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/roadstencil-fonts/devel/roadstencil-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- roadstencil-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 20:11:21 -0000 1.5 +++ roadstencil-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 05:06:18 -0000 1.6 @@ -1,64 +1,60 @@ -%define fontname roadstencil -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontname roadstencil +%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Roadstencil Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/andyfitz/237 Source0: http://openfontlibrary.org/people/andyfitz/andyfitz_-_roadstencil.otf -Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig.conf +Source1: %{fontname}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A rough font influenced by roadwork stencils %prep -cp -p %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_DIR/roadstencil.otf %build %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 644 *.otf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE0} %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}/roadstencil.otf -install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} -install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} - -%clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} +ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi +%clean +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.otf -%files -%defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc -%dir %{fontdir}/ -%{fontdir}/*.otf -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf + +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley - 1.0-7 +- Update for new guidelines + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild @@ -76,3 +72,4 @@ * Sun May 04 2008 Jon Stanley - 1.0-1 - Initial package + From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 06:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090610.n296ATJC027584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|libgxim |imsettings Summary|fontforge ignores keyboard |accelerator keys is ignored |input since last system | |update | --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-09 02:10:29 EDT --- That looks like a bug in XIM handling code in fontforge. there are a feature to keep IM turned on but to be able to input ASCII in scim-anthy say. in this mode, I can't use shortcut keys nor accelerator keys on fontforge as well. This is a well known issue to deal with key events. in GTK+, they resolve a kind of this issue checking accelerators before forwarding them to IM. though that way introduces another issue that keybindings in IM that acts with a prefix key for accelerators doesn't work. I'd say this isn't a libgxim nor imsettings bugs but should be an application bug, fontforge in this case since this happens without libgxim/imsettings. moreover accelerator keys actually works in the file dialog. guess that's probably because the entry box picks up the filtered event and process accelerators. Anyway until now no one who uses IM didn't just complain and libgxim didn't work due to a bug in Fedora 10 GA. However there are a workaround for someone who don't really use IM - although that might affects a performance because all the key events are forwarding synchronously. but in this mode, the key events won't be filtered out unless it's something what IM converts from the key events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 08:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 04:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090813.n298D4aW014728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mclroy at gmail.com) --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-09 04:13:03 EDT --- I've built a testing package with the above workaround. please test it carefully. I'm not sure if this workaround should be enabled by default because that may affects a performance since all of keyevents will be sent synchronously. i.e. XFilterEvent just waits for a response and deal with it straightforward. Testing package is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1230892 To turn off a workaround: % gconftool-2 -t bool -s /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Mon Mar 9 08:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-settings-daemon (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 502293] Screen rotation should adjust font subpixel ordering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090309083029.DD79723F509@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502293 gnome-settings-daemon | plugins | Ver: 2.25.x Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net, | |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502293. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 12:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091233.n29CXhNG001827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-09 08:33:42 EDT --- No problem. Sounds like my life these days. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 13:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091330.n29DUaRI006775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Michael changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mclroy at gmail.com) | --- Comment #11 from Michael 2009-03-09 09:30:35 EDT --- > That looks like a bug in XIM handling code in fontforge. ... Though it's strange to me that fontforge worked well until the impact of libgxim-0.3.2-3.fc10.i386. Well. Now I'm again up to date with the latest version of libgxim: [root at ex ~]# rpm -qi libgxim Name : libgxim Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.3.2 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 4.fc10 Build Date: Tue 03 Mar 2009 05:41:07 PM MSK Install Date: Mon 09 Mar 2009 03:13:54 PM MSK Build Host: xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: libgxim-0.3.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Size : 395396 License: LGPLv2+ Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 04 Mar 2009 04:28:51 PM MSK, Key ID bf226fcc4ebfc273 and once again fontforge doesn't work anymore: [mike at ex ~]$ rpm -qi fontforge Name : fontforge Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 20080828 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 1.fc10 Build Date: Thu 04 Sep 2008 12:11:37 AM MSD Install Date: Fri 16 Jan 2009 05:18:31 AM MSK Build Host: xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com Group : Applications/Publishing Source RPM: fontforge-20080828-1.fc10.src.rpm Size : 16289975 License: BSD Ok. I take the testing package and install it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1230895&name=imsettings-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1230895&name=imsettings-libs-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386.rpm [root at ex libgxim]# rpm -Uhv imsettings-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386.rpm imsettings-libs-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:imsettings-libs ########################################### [ 50%] 2:imsettings ########################################### [100%] [root at ex libgxim]# [mike at ex ~]$ rpm -qi imsettings Name : imsettings Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.105.1 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 3.fc10.1 Build Date: Mon 09 Mar 2009 11:06:19 AM MSK Install Date: Mon 09 Mar 2009 03:46:10 PM MSK Build Host: x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : Applications/System Source RPM: imsettings-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.src.rpm Size : 458796 License: LGPLv2+ I guess I have to restart thanks it doesn't take much time. Yes. Fontforge now works with: [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward true ========================================================= It's strange still that even after the restart: [mike at ex ~]$ uptime 16:08:59 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 1.50, 0.47, 0.16 [mike at ex ~]$ I have: [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward true [mike at ex ~]$ fontforge test.sfd & But fontforge still doesn't work and I have to issue: [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 -t bool -s /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward true After that fontforge works well: [mike at ex ~]$ fontforge test.sfd & Though there's no obvious change: [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward true [mike at ex ~]$ The deal is quite tricky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 13:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091341.n29DfWC8017529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-09 09:41:31 EDT --- Fixed. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 14:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091451.n29EpP3S001673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-09 10:51:25 EDT --- Thank you for testing. (In reply to comment #11) > Though it's strange to me that fontforge worked well until the impact of > libgxim-0.3.2-3.fc10.i386. I should do check a reproducibility on -1.fc10 first but I didn't do that but just confirmed a issue on new one. so just reverted now. but I still see this issue with even old libgxim. if you can still see fontforge working back by downgrading libgxim, please try: % killall imsettings-applet % LIBGXIM_DEBUG=all imsettings-applet --disable-xsettings and run fontforge on other terminal say. I guess any keyevents isn't sending through imsettings-applet then. > But fontforge still doesn't work and I have to issue: > > [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 -t bool -s /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward > true > > After that fontforge works well: > > [mike at ex ~]$ fontforge test.sfd & > > Though there's no obvious change: > > [mike at ex ~]$ gconftool-2 --get /apps/imsettings-applet/sync_on_forward > true > [mike at ex ~]$ > > The deal is quite tricky. Okay. let me have a look at that. and probably push the updates with other fixes as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 17:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489109] Python scripts don't work with fontforge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091704.n29H4coI029704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489109 --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-09 13:04:38 EDT --- I thought that maybe just supplying a symling from /usr/lib/libgunicode.so to /usr/lib/libgunicode.so.3 would be sufficient - at least this did the trick for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 17:40:28 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.68,1.69 Message-ID: <20090309174028.D3DBF70034@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20001 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: * Thu Mar 09 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.8-2.1 - Preserve timestamp of FTL.TXT when converting to UTF-8. Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.68 retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -r1.68 -r1.69 --- freetype.spec 24 Feb 2009 18:29:01 -0000 1.68 +++ freetype.spec 9 Mar 2009 17:39:58 -0000 1.69 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.8 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 2.1%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ # Convert FTL.txt to UTF-8 pushd docs -iconv -f latin1 -t utf-8 < FTL.TXT > FTL.TXT.tmp && mv FTL.TXT.tmp FTL.TXT +iconv -f latin1 -t utf-8 < FTL.TXT > FTL.TXT.tmp && \ +touch -r FTL.TXT FTL.TXT.tmp && \ +mv FTL.TXT.tmp FTL.TXT popd @@ -219,6 +221,9 @@ %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu Mar 09 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.8-2.1 +- Preserve timestamp of FTL.TXT when converting to UTF-8. + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.3.8-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From jstanley at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 9 17:49:38 2009 From: jstanley at fedoraproject.org (Jon Stanley) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel sportrop-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090309174938.81A4570034@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: jstanley Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23694 Modified Files: sportrop-fonts.spec Log Message: update to new packaging guidelines Index: sportrop-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sportrop-fonts/devel/sportrop-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- sportrop-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 02:33:12 -0000 1.2 +++ sportrop-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 17:49:08 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ -%define fontname sportrop -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} -%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d +%define fontname sportrop +%define fontconf 63-%{fontname}.conf + +#define archivename %{name}-%{version} Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.9 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: A multiline decorative font Group: User Interface/X @@ -14,11 +15,15 @@ Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description A neat multiline font + %prep %setup -c chmod 0644 *.txt @@ -34,38 +39,35 @@ %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -pm 644 Sportrop.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} -install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir} -install -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} +install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} +ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \ + %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf} -%clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +%clean +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi -%postun -if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{fontdir} || : -fi +%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf -%files -%defattr(644,root,root,755) %doc OFL_FAQ.txt OFL_License.txt tabl_c.jpg -%config(noreplace) %{fontconfdir}/63-%{fontname}.conf -%dir %{fontdir}/ -%{fontdir}/*.ttf + +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Mon Mar 9 2009 Jon Stanley - 0.9-6 +- Update to new packaging guidelines + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild @@ -81,3 +83,4 @@ * Tue Jul 22 2008 Jon Stanley - 0.9-1 - Initial package + From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 03:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244384] Firefox font antialises too much In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100353.n2A3rtfc025922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244384 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #25 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:55:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #26 from Jesse Keating 2009-03-09 23:53:53 EDT --- I just looked at the page with Minefield 3.1 Beta 2 and I don't notice anything really wrong with it. Is this still an issue with the latest FF builds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 09:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100922.n2A9Mnfr010882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|extras-orphan at fedoraproject |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com |.org | --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-03-10 05:22:48 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 09:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244384] Firefox font antialises too much In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100958.n2A9wBqD017562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244384 Marek Matulka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #27 from Marek Matulka 2009-03-10 05:58:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > I just looked at the page with Minefield 3.1 Beta 2 and I don't notice anything > really wrong with it. Is this still an issue with the latest FF builds? issues still not resolved in Minefield: * default fonts are bigger then expected and slightly different (I understand a reason why they are set on linux platform that way, but they should default to Times New Roman / Arial if they are available) * when font hinting is set to ?Slight?, default sans-serif font has colourful artefacts, it disappears when hinting is set to ?Hard? * My desktop has font size set to 7.5pt, Firefox is using 7pt in menus / windows though anyway I got used to this issues :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 15:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101519.n2AFJ2u1030290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-10 11:19:02 EDT --- converted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 15:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101519.n2AFJ2G0030315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480445, which changed state. Bug 480445 Summary: [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 15:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101539.n2AFdBPO004419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #2 from sangu 2009-03-10 11:39:11 EDT --- This bug still happens in 2.6.98-1.gb39c36a.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 01:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:29:15 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110129.n2B1TFqG026291@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Stellan Klebom changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |klebom at hotmail.com --- Comment #173 from Stellan Klebom 2009-03-10 18:28:11 PDT --- I find it a little a bit ironical that the one and only MDC example for @font-face is not working both with Shiretoko and Minefield. https://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2935/=webfont-sample.html https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/@font-face It seems like some ttf-files won't work. See my test case http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera2.html. This testcase uses all 10 font files in the Bitstream Vera font family. Firefox fails to load 4 of them. As far as I know they are all standard true type fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 01:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:38:58 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110138.n2B1cwTA029344@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #174 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2009-03-10 18:38:04 PDT --- The example on MDC is working fine for me in the latest nightly of Shiretoko. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 01:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:57:48 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110157.n2B1vmCq000787@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #175 from Stellan Klebom 2009-03-10 18:56:55 PDT --- Well I'm at the latest Shiretoko too... Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090310 Shiretoko/3.1b4pre Slightly strange? I tried with a fresh empty prfoile just in case. Same result. What did you see with my vera2 testcase? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 02:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:37:56 -0700 Subject: [Bug 458169] [@font-face] implement downloadable font support on Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110237.n2B2buV7026446@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458169 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |480098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 04:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:54:04 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110454.n2B4s4aI031375@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #176 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd 2009-03-10 21:53:09 PDT --- According to the error console, there are errors occurring parsing your HTML, with invalid values specified for several things. You may want to check that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 07:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:21:44 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110721.n2B7LiGW020993@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #177 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) 2009-03-11 00:20:42 PDT --- When I try https://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2935/=webfont-sample.html , nsFontFaceLoader::OnStreamComplete for http://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf gets called with aStatus=0x805303f4 (a failure that I don't recognize). mCanceled is 1 in nsHttpChannel::OnStopRequest. I wonder whether url("https://developer.mozilla.org/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf") or url("/@api/deki/files/2934/=VeraSeBd.ttf") may work better, but I don't know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 08:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:09:18 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110809.n2B89IeI013215@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #178 from Jeff Walden 2009-03-11 01:08:12 PDT --- http://silver.warwickcompsoc.co.uk/mozilla/misc/nserror?0x805303f4 sez that's NS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI. A glance at nsCSSScanner::NextURL doesn't show anything odd, so I suspect the code to create a URL from the resulting string doesn't like the unescaped character, maybe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 15:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111551.n2BFpFcJ029316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #43 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-11 11:51:10 EDT --- I'm still confused. From what I understand, an alias I added in recent fontconfig updates is causing this. If that's true, which alias, and if you can move it further down to not cause the bug, what's the patch? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 18:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111800.n2BI0Ipb030928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-11 14:00:17 EDT --- wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 18:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111800.n2BI0WOq031004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-11 14:00:32 EDT --- wastesedge-0.3.4-0.12.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 18:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489733] gdm crashes on language selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111809.n2BI97Mn001998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489733 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, mclasen at redhat.com Component|gdm |pango AssignedTo|jmccann at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-11 14:09:07 EDT --- Crash is inside pango: Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0x0000003124c421e7 in g_logv () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000003124c421e7 in g_logv () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x0000003124c42583 in g_log () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x0000003ce480b1e3 in pango_fc_fontset_finalize (object=0x25fdf20) at pangofc-fontmap.c:842 #3 0x000000312500d9ef in g_object_unref () from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #4 0x0000003124c29eaa in ?? () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #5 0x0000003124c2b40a in ?? () from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #6 0x0000003ce480b9e5 in pango_fc_fontset_cache ( fcfontmap=, fontset=) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1619 #7 pango_fc_font_map_load_fontset (fcfontmap=, fontset=) at pangofc-fontmap.c:1656 #8 0x0000000005eb7761 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/modules/libpk-gtk-module.so #9 0x0000003127c191b3 in itemize_state_update_for_new_run ( state=) at pango-context.c:1288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 18:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487593] crash changing language in gdm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111813.n2BID1vo002308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harald at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-11 14:12:59 EDT --- *** Bug 489733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 18:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489733] gdm crashes on language selection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903111813.n2BID0oh002273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489733 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-11 14:12:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 487593 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 20:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:06:52 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112006.n2BK6q3o028918@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #179 from Stellan Klebom 2009-03-11 13:05:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #176) > According to the error console, there are errors occurring parsing your HTML, > with invalid values specified for several things. You may want to check that. My test cases all validate for HTML 4.01 strict and CSS3. The messages you are referring to are CSS warnings for http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera.html not for http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera2.html that I asked you about. In the "vera2" case Shiretoko only loads 6 out of 10 font files in windows version. In the "vera" case Shiretoko is generating CSS-warnings for valid CSS3. That's because full standard isn't implemented. For example "font-weight: all" or "font-style: all" etc is unsupported by Gecko. Gecko also don't regonize a list of values per spec. e.i. "font-style: oblique, italic" or "font-weight: 400, 500, 600". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 20:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:12 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112036.n2BKaCM2007957@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #180 from Ryan VanderMeulen 2009-03-11 13:35:03 PDT --- This is almost certainly fodder for a new bug rather than posting more messages to this one and subjecting everyone CCed to it to this. Please file a new one and mark it as blocking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 21:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:58:01 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112158.n2BLw1Oq007935@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #181 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-03-11 14:56:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #173) > It seems like some ttf-files won't work. > See my test case http://klebom.se/stellan/css/font-face/vera2.html . > > This testcase uses all 10 font files in the Bitstream Vera font family. Firefox > fails to load 4 of them. As far as I know they are all standard true type > fonts. When I load this testcase in a DEBUG build, I see 4 occurrences of this warning printed to the console: WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file /home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp, line 809 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 23:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:11:36 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112311.n2BNBaqo030495@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #182 from Stellan Klebom 2009-03-11 16:10:12 PDT --- (In reply to comment #181) > WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file > /home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp, > line 809 Too bad!! I just did some research on the vera fonts. Bitstream donated them to open source through the gnome foundation. The four font files are broken from the source... That means there are no correct files to be found, and also that almost every linux installation have the faulty files, and of course this also means that Gecko needs to render fonts even with invalid checksum as in the vera font case, since these broken fonts render fine with Safari for windows for example. The files VeraBd.ttf, VeraIt.ttf, VeraSe.ttf, VeraSeBd.ttf all have checksum error in their "head" table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Wed Mar 11 23:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:18:58 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903112318.n2BNIw0R001172@mrapp51.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #183 from Bill Gianopoulos 2009-03-11 16:17:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #182) > (In reply to comment #181) > > > WARNING: invalid font (bad checksum): file > > /home/dbaron/builds/mozilla-central/mozilla/gfx/thebes/src/gfxFontUtils.cpp, > > line 809 > > Too bad!! I just did some research on the vera fonts. Bitstream donated them to > open source through the gnome foundation. The four font files are broken from > the source... > > That means there are no correct files to be found, and also that almost every > linux installation have the faulty files, and of course this also means that > Gecko needs to render fonts even with invalid checksum as in the vera font > case, since these broken fonts render fine with Safari for windows for example. > > The files VeraBd.ttf, VeraIt.ttf, VeraSe.ttf, VeraSeBd.ttf all have checksum > error > in their "head" table. Wern''t you asked in comment 180 to stop spamming this bug and to file a new bug on this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 00:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120032.n2C0WSIH014913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-11 20:32:28 EDT --- Ok - I think we have to wait for an installable rawhide or F11 Beta for further testing. With various font .conf files added to CJK fonts I think things are a bit better now but there may still be some more finer adjusts needed for F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 00:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487593] crash changing language in gdm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120054.n2C0sP3u021233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-11 20:54:23 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 05:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120512.n2C5CJPM032335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-12 01:12:18 EDT --- Updated in lklug-fonts-0.2.2-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 05:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489833] New: Default Font Rendering is Poor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Default Font Rendering is Poor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489833 Summary: Default Font Rendering is Poor Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: cwgarfield12 at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of Bug: In Fedora 10, fonts are by default rendered poorly in terms of legibility and proportion. While this problem is in reality systemwide with ALL fonts, it is most noticeable in Firefox and OpenOffice. In Firefox, fonts are too big proportionally no matter how font settings are changed in Edit|Preferences. They look about 1 size bigger or smaller than they should be. In OpenOffice, fonts do not appear antialiased at all (regardless of sans serif or serif or system hinting settings) and the edges of the letters appear very jagged instead of smooth. One can observe a similar phenomenon in AbiWord as well. This makes documents difficult to look at for extended periods of time. A long time ago, Debian/Ubuntu had similar problems with fonts, but they patched the font rendering packages and now the problem is fixed in those distros. Fedora has not done the same and this problem has persisted through many releases with no action being taken. This is most emphatically NOT a bug with Firefox, Abiword, OpenOffice or any other external program. This has to do with Fedora itself, as one can clearly see from the descriptions that follow. Steps to fix bug: After much research, packages located at http://www.bevenhall.se/jim/fedora-cleartype/ were found to completely fix the problem. Steps as quoted from http://www.bevenhall.se/jim/fedora-cleartype/ "Tired of crappy and ugly fedora fonts? Download and replace these rpms for F8 or F10. 'rpm -Uvh --replacepkgs --force cairo-* freetype-* libXft-* msfonts-*' [NOTE: msfonts-* is COMPLETELY optional, only useful if one wishes to use those fonts. /NOTE] Restart X to make sure everything is reloaded. Turn on and adjust antialiasing and subpixel smoothing. Enjoy "cleartype enabled" fonts. Thanks to jaganath for the patch tips and thanks to Erik for the 64-bit rpms." The result of the above fix: Fonts are now beautiful and easy to read systemwide. They antialias well across the system and proportionally scale well in Firefox. These packages are freely redistributable as Fedora installs them by default (albeit the unpatched versions). Clearly, it is not a problem with the fonts individually. Rather the bug concerns the font rendering packages cairo, freetype, and libXft. Steps to Reproduce: Simply compare the font-rendering quality of a default Fedora 10 install to an install that was patched with these packages. Simply a matter of before and after. To fully see changes, one should be sure to "Turn on and adjust antialiasing and subpixel smoothing." as mentioned in the steps above after restarting X. Other bugs that are completely fixed by the patched packages are: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244384 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198082 A personal appeal: I appeal to the community to please make this a priority before the next release. I just don't want people to be turned off Fedora because of it's poor default font rendering. As one can see from the bug reports above, this problem has lingered for years now. It is in fact a legitimate bug and it deserves attention. Fedora is a great distro and this is really the main thing keeping it from realizing it's true potential from a user perspective. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 05:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489833] Default Font Rendering is Poor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120528.n2C5SFoT006048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489833 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-12 01:28:14 EDT --- We cannot enable these features in Fedora because they violate software patents. You can try the freetype-freeworld packages from RPM Fusion, but these packages do not carry Ubuntu's antialiasing patches which are not upstream, they only enable the bytecode interpreter and subpixel antialiasing from upstream freetype (which cannot be done in Fedora due to software patents). The only complaint which sounds valid is this one: > In Firefox, fonts are too big proportionally no matter how font settings are > changed in Edit|Preferences. They look about 1 size bigger or smaller than they > should be. I've also noticed GTK+ apps displaying larger fonts at the same point size and dpi than Qt apps. 94 dpi in pango is about the same size as 96 dpi in Qt. But this is a completely separate issue, it has nothing to do with the patent-encumbered patches you're referencing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 05:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120542.n2C5gkCb005341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #18 from seth vidal 2009-03-12 01:42:44 EDT --- nicholas, can you check out latest yum from yum's git repo and give it a try? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 10:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121020.n2CAKhB3031341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480453, which changed state. Bug 480453 Summary: [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 10:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121020.n2CAKgUB031314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-03-12 06:20:40 EDT --- Fixed by Jesse Keating in foobillard-3.0a-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 11:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489833] Default Font Rendering is Poor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121152.n2CBqATA022330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489833 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-12 07:52:10 EDT --- 1. OO.o behaves differently since it uses a different text stack. This is being fixed upstream, you can ask OO.o devs to accelerate the move to pango/cairo if you like 2. GNOME font sizes are different: this is a result of GNOME allowing the overloading of DPI value in gconf instead of using the Xorg DPI value as everything else. Complain GNOME-side. DE people need to be hit with a huge cluestick and leave DPI to X (and modify this value at the X level if needed not in private overlays others apps do not see) 3. Cleartype. Not going to happen for legal reasons. Additionnaly it only performs good on very specific hardware, and very specific fonts (MS fonts which have bugs cleartype hides; we're not going to optimise our display for fonts we do not ship to the detriment of fonts we do ship). For every comment you'll find on the net praising those patches you'll find three stating they suck and make things worse. (likewise for Ubuntu vs Fedora text rendering) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489833] Default Font Rendering is Poor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121506.n2CF6eDO006376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489833 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-12 11:06:41 EDT --- ad 2. It's not that. My screen reports a resolution which is basically 96?96 dpi, and I even tried forcing both KDE and GNOME to exactly that, GTK+ apps still display larger fonts at the same size. Only when setting GTK+/GNOME to 94 dpi did I get approximately the same size (but not quite as nice looking fonts as with 96 dpi, though I got used to that). What happens is that if I turn down the hinting (autohinter, mind you, I don't have freetype-freeworld installed, I only maintain it ;-) ), the effect disappears (but the fonts look bad), the stronger the (auto)hinting, the larger GTK+'s fonts get and the smaller Qt's. Somehow they use different algorithms. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489919] New: Unable to view any PS/EPS files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unable to view any PS/EPS files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 Summary: Unable to view any PS/EPS files Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint at redhat.com ReportedBy: udayreddy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=334947) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334947) A sample EPS file Description of problem: After some recent yum updates, I'm unable to view a postscript file using any of the tools available (gv, evince). I've tried postscript files generated using latex/dvips as well as those generated directly from gnuplot. Having used latex and authoring/publishing tools on Linux for more than 9 years, this instability has shocked me. With gv, all pages are displayed blank (the right number of pages are displayed though). With evince, it is stuck in loading. On another f9 machine with the same version of gv, I don't have a problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-fonts-*-7.2-6.fc9 gv-3.6.3-3.fc9 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open a postscript or an encapsulated postscript file using gv or evince. I've attached a sample one. Actual results: All pages are displayed blank. Expected results: Additional info: I have attached a sample eps file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121529.n2CFTVU9008913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-03-12 11:29:29 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] New: FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Summary: FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id= 3157&release_id=667610 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: xose.vazquez at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora - Very unfortunately, FreeType 2.3.8 contained a change that broke its official ABI. The end result is that programs compiled against previous versions of the library, but dynamically linked to 2.3.8 can experience memory corruption if they call the `FT_Get_PS_Font_Info' function. We recommend all users to upgrade to 2.3.9 as soon as possible, or to downgrade to a previous release of the library if this is not an option. The origin of the bug is that a new field was added to the publicly defined `PS_FontInfoRec' structure. Unfortunately, objects of this type can be stack or heap allocated by callers of `FT_Get_PS_Font_Info', resulting in a memory buffer overwrite with its implementation in 2.3.8. If you want to know whether your code is vulnerable to this issue, simply search for the substrings `PS_FontInfo' and `PS_Font_Info' in your source code. If none is found, your code is safe and is not affected. The FreeType team apologizes for the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121542.n2CFgsGv015586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-12 11:42:54 EDT --- Note that this only affects Rawhide/F11, F9 has 2.3.5, F10 has 2.3.7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 15:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121544.n2CFiLxe016468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-12 11:44:21 EDT --- And FWIW, the impact on Rawhide should be low to none due to the mass rebuild. Still, I think it should probably be upgraded to 2.3.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 16:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489919] Unable to view any PS/EPS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121603.n2CG3PuA021507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 --- Comment #1 from Uday Kumar 2009-03-12 12:03:22 EDT --- the problem seems to be font related. for eg. when i try to do an epstopdf on the attached file, i get $ epstopdf /tmp/clock-freq.eps Error: /invalidfont in /findfont Operand stack: Symbol-Oblique Symbol Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1905 1 3 %oparray_pop 1904 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- 1888 1 3 %oparray_pop 1771 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- 1863 2 4 %oparray_pop Dictionary stack: --dict:1149/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:75/200(L)-- --dict:169/256(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: 2 GPL Ghostscript 8.63: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 now, when i run the same on the f9 machine that doesn't have this problem, it converts it to pdf just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 16:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489919] Unable to view any PS/EPS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121614.n2CGElGO023924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 --- Comment #2 from Uday Kumar 2009-03-12 12:14:47 EDT --- on further investigation, i found that everything in my /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/ was missing. can't gv or evince be more verbose when they fail? the unix philosophy has always been to be silent when everything goes fine and fail as noisily as possible when failing. is there some way these files were deleted automatically, besides a file system thrash? $ sudo rpm --verify urw-fonts missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010013l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010013l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010015l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010015l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010033l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010033l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010035l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/a010035l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018012l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018012l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018015l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018015l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018032l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018032l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018035l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/b018035l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059013l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059013l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059016l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059016l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059033l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059033l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059036l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/c059036l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/d050000l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/d050000l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019004l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019004l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019023l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019023l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019024l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019024l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019043l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019043l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019044l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019044l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019063l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019063l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019064l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019064l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021003l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021004l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021004l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021023l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021023l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021024l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n021024l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022003l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022003l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022004l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022004l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022023l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022023l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052003l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052003l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052004l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052004l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052023l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052023l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052024l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/p052024l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/s050000l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/s050000l.pfb missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/z003034l.afm missing /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/z003034l.pfb i reinstalled urw-fonts and everything's fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 16:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489919] Unable to view any PS/EPS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121618.n2CGI8nk021210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 Uday Kumar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |than at redhat.com Component|xorg-x11-fonts |urw-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 16:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903121644.n2CGi4Xp026888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 seth vidal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #19 from seth vidal 2009-03-12 12:44:01 EDT --- latest rawhide pkg yum-3.2.21-14 has a patch that I believe fixes this problem entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 00:46:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130046.n2D0k34Y005066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org --- Comment #3 from Adam Goode 2009-03-12 20:46:04 EDT --- This upgrade will also require rebuilding all freetype-using applcations, correct? At least the ones with 'PS_FontInfo' or 'PS_Font_Info'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 05:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130544.n2D5iv7d027813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-13 01:44:57 EDT --- Hi, To help with adopting the new font packages guidelines, I have made the changes to the SPEC file and uploaded to http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/jomolhari-fonts.spec Please refer and make the changes. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 18:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485562] Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131842.n2DIgAR2006770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-13 14:42:10 EDT --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 22:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132205.n2DM5b3R021166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-13 18:05:38 EDT --- Any idea how to find all such packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Mar 13 22:15:16 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel .cvsignore, 1.21, 1.22 freetype.spec, 1.69, 1.70 sources, 1.21, 1.22 Message-ID: <20090313221516.32FE570128@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30748 Modified Files: .cvsignore freetype.spec sources Log Message: * Thu Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-1 - Update to 2.3.9. - Resolves #489928 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000 1.21 +++ .cvsignore 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 -freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 -ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +freetype-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +freetype-doc-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +ft2demos-2.3.9.tar.bz2 Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.69 retrieving revision 1.70 diff -u -r1.69 -r1.70 --- freetype.spec 9 Mar 2009 17:39:58 -0000 1.69 +++ freetype.spec 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.70 @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype -Version: 2.3.8 -Release: 2.1%{?dist} +Version: 2.3.9 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -221,6 +221,10 @@ %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Thu Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-1 +- Update to 2.3.9. +- Resolves #489928 + * Thu Mar 09 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.8-2.1 - Preserve timestamp of FTL.TXT when converting to UTF-8. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- sources 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 -0000 1.21 +++ sources 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.22 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -6cf31a08826715a0d16ae366da9c7d3b freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2 -de1cc7cf098e11fba5898efdab1bc23d freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2 -6582649a8b877ec8d9893a9d834f7ab6 ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2 +d76233108aca9c9606cdbd341562ad9a freetype-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +ddcb766f7c5abab0e7061dcf32a0268f freetype-doc-2.3.9.tar.bz2 +144b4c750e91595154a66709c75fdf0d ft2demos-2.3.9.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 22:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132226.n2DMQ7pX022123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-13 18:26:07 EDT --- Built 2.3.9. Doesn't look that bad: $ repoquery --whatrequires freetype mythtv-setup-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 fontconfig-0:2.6.97-5.g945d6a4.fc11.i586 libotf-0:0.9.8-2.fc11.i586 librsvg2-0:2.22.3-2.fc11.i586 pango-0:1.23.0-3.fc11.i586 mythtv-frontend-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 libgnomeprint22-devel-0:2.18.5-3.fc11.i586 gimp-2:2.6.5-4.fc11.i586 libmyth-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 freetype-devel-0:2.3.8-2.1.fc11.i586 freetype-demos-0:2.3.8-2.1.fc11.i586 pango, librsvg2, and libgnomeprint22 are not affected. fontconfig *is* affected. Remains: libmyth-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 mythtv-setup-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 mythtv-frontend-0:0.22-0.1.svn.r19722.fc11.i386 libotf-0:0.9.8-2.fc11.i586 gimp-2:2.6.5-4.fc11.i586 Not hard to check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Mar 13 22:30:10 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.39, 1.40 fontconfig.spec, 1.125, 1.126 sources, 1.40, 1.41 Message-ID: <20090313223010.872E470128@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1292 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.39 retrieving revision 1.40 diff -u -r1.39 -r1.40 --- .cvsignore 10 Mar 2009 08:07:07 -0000 1.39 +++ .cvsignore 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.40 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.98.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.125 retrieving revision 1.126 diff -u -r1.125 -r1.126 --- fontconfig.spec 10 Mar 2009 08:07:08 -0000 1.125 +++ fontconfig.spec 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.126 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.98 -Release: 1.gb39c36a%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.99.behdad +Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad + * Tue Mar 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.98-1.gb39c36a - Update to 2.6.98-1.gb39c36a Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.40 retrieving revision 1.41 diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41 --- sources 10 Mar 2009 08:07:08 -0000 1.40 +++ sources 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.41 @@ -1 +1 @@ -8468c848937965e13b66a88b0bf231b9 fontconfig-2.6.98.tar.gz +16d950304af70cc47426fb360c1921f5 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 22:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132231.n2DMVtNA023377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-13 18:31:55 EDT --- > repoquery --whatrequires freetype Uh, that's not a complete way to get all packages depending on freetype. You're missing the --alldeps. Your list is just the list of packages with explicit Requires: freetype. When I run repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps freetype | wc -l, I get: 1122 That means there are 1122 (!) packages which link against freetype. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Mar 13 23:11:39 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec, 1.126, 1.127 sources, 1.41, 1.42 Message-ID: <20090313231139.58DE470132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10400 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: Update to respinned fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.126 retrieving revision 1.127 diff -u -r1.126 -r1.127 --- fontconfig.spec 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.126 +++ fontconfig.spec 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 -0000 1.127 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.99.behdad -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-2 +- Previous tarball was broken. Rebuild with respinned ball. + * Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.41 retrieving revision 1.42 diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 --- sources 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.41 +++ sources 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 -0000 1.42 @@ -1 +1 @@ -16d950304af70cc47426fb360c1921f5 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz +1e713a359867608d7733ebec47b9daaf fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 00:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140003.n2E03clc006813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #7 from Adam Goode 2009-03-13 20:03:37 EDT --- It's not the linking that matters, it's the headers. So we should be searching for BuildRequires: freetype2-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 00:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140006.n2E06vao007522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #8 from Adam Goode 2009-03-13 20:06:57 EDT --- # repoquery --alldeps --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires freetype-devel | sort adonthell-0:0.3.5-0.6.fc11.src agg-0:2.5-7.fc11.src alfont-0:2.0.6-5.fc11.src amanith-0:0.3-11.fc11.src asc-0:2.2.0.0-3.fc11.src autotrace-0:0.31.1-20.fc11.src bacula-0:2.4.4-3.fc11.src blender-0:2.48a-15.fc11.src cairo-0:1.8.6-2.fc11.src cegui-0:0.6.2-3.fc11.src ClanLib06-0:0.6.5-14.fc11.src Coin2-0:2.5.0-5.fc11.src crystalspace-0:1.2.1-5.fc11.src cvsgraph-0:1.6.1-7.fc11.src directfb-0:1.2.7-4.fc11.src dvdauthor-0:0.6.14-8.fc11.src dvipng-0:1.11-2.fc11.src e16-0:0.16.8.15-2.fc11.src emacs-1:22.3-8.fc11.src esc-0:1.0.1-12.fc11.src evas-0:0.9.9.050-2.fc11.src extremetuxracer-0:0.4-2.fc11.src fbdesk-0:1.4.1-5.fc11.src firefox-0:3.1-0.7.beta2.fc11.src fontconfig-0:2.6.97-5.g945d6a4.fc11.src fontforge-0:20090224-1.fc11.src fontmatrix-0:0.4.2-4.fc11.src foobillard-0:3.0a-12.src ftgl-0:2.1.2-10.fc11.src ganglia-0:3.1.2-2.fc11.src gbdfed-0:1.4-2.fc11.src gd-0:2.0.35-8.fc11.src gimp-2:2.6.5-4.fc11.src glyph-keeper-0:0.32-5.fc11.src gnash-0:0.8.5-3.fc11.src gnubg-1:0.9.0.1-7.fc11.src GraphicsMagick-0:1.1.14-4.fc11.src graphviz-0:2.20.3-3.fc11.src grass-0:6.3.0-10.fc11.src ImageMagick-0:6.4.9.6-1.fc11.src imlib2-0:1.4.2-4.fc11.src inkscape-0:0.47-0.5.20090301svn.fc11.src Inventor-0:2.1.5-35.fc11.src Io-language-0:20071010-10.fc11.src java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-14.b14.fc11.src k3d-0:0.6.7.0-9.fc11.src kdebase3-0:3.5.10-8.fc11.src kismet-0:0.0.2008.05.R1-3.fc10.src koffice-2:1.6.3-20.20090306svn.fc11.src lesstif-0:0.95.0-28.fc11.src libAfterImage-0:1.18-3.fc11.src libgdiplus-0:2.4-2.RC1.fc11.src libotf-0:0.9.8-2.fc11.src libpst-0:0.6.29-1.fc11.src librsvg2-0:2.22.3-2.fc11.src libtwin-0:0.0.3-2.fc11.src libXfont-0:1.4.0-3.fc11.src libXft-0:2.1.13-2.fc11.src lush-0:1.2.1-5.fc11.src mapnik-0:0.5.2-0.10.svn780.fc11.src mapserver-0:5.2.1-6.fc11.src neverball-0:1.4.0-16.fc11.src nut-0:2.4.1-2.fc11.src ocaml-camlimages-0:3.0.1-7.fc11.src ogre-0:1.6.1-3.fc11.src openoffice.org-1:3.1.0-4.1.fc11.src openvrml-0:0.17.10-2.0.fc11.src oyranos-0:0.1.9-3.fc11.src pango-0:1.23.0-3.fc11.src paraview-0:3.4.0-4.fc11.src perl-GD-0:2.39-2.fc11.src perl-Imager-0:0.67-3.fc11.src petitboot-0:0.2-3.fc11.src php-0:5.2.9-1.fc11.src pl-0:5.7.6-4.fc11.src plplot-0:5.9.2-3.fc11.src plt-scheme-1:4.1.2-2.fc11.src pymol-0:1.2-2.20090226svn3616.fc11.src python-imaging-0:1.1.6-14.fc11.src python-matplotlib-0:0.98.5.2-4.fc11.src q-0:7.11-4.fc11.src qt-1:4.5.0-3.fc11.src qt3-0:3.3.8b-23.fc11.src raidem-0:0.3.1-10.fc11.src rcssserver3d-0:0.6-11.fc11.src rrdtool-0:1.3.6-2.fc11.src rxvt-unicode-0:9.06-1.fc11.src scribus-0:1.3.5-0.9.12516svn.fc11.src SDL_ttf-0:2.0.9-5.fc11.src seamonkey-0:1.1.14-4.fc11.src slim-0:1.3.1-5.fc11.src spicebird-0:0.7-6.fc11.src stellarium-0:0.10.1-4.fc11.src sunbird-0:0.9-6.fc11.src TeXmacs-0:1.0.7.1-2.fc11.src Thunar-0:1.0.0-1.fc11.src thunderbird-0:3.0-1.beta2.fc11.src tigervnc-0:0.0.90-0.3.20090303svn3631.fc11.src torsmo-0:0.18-9.fc11.src ttf2pt1-0:3.4.4-8.fc11.src ttmkfdir-0:3.0.9-30.fc11.src tuxpaint-1:0.9.20-3.fc11.src tuxpuck-0:0.8.2-7.fc11.src tvtime-0:1.0.2-5.fc11.src vdr-0:1.6.0-16.fc11.src vdr-text2skin-0:1.1-24.cvsext0.10.fc11.src vtk-0:5.0.4-26.fc11.src WebKit-0:1.1.1-1.fc11.src wesnoth-0:1.5.12-1.fc11.src wmx-0:7-4.fc11.src xdvik-0:22.84.14-5.fc11.src xdvipdfmx-0:0.4-4.fc11.src xmbdfed-0:4.7-4.fc11.src xorg-x11-font-utils-1:7.2-7.fc11.src xorg-x11-xfs-1:1.0.5-4.fc11.src xournal-0:0.4.2.1-3.fc11.src xpdf-1:3.02-12.fc11.src xulrunner-0:1.9.1-0.9.beta2.fc11.src -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 00:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140016.n2E0GWps009061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #9 from Adam Goode 2009-03-13 20:16:32 EDT --- That should be everything, though I'm not 100% sure about it. Unpacking and searching these sources for 'PS_FontInfo' and 'PS_Font_Info' will show what to rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 04:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140445.n2E4j6f0024117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 00:45:06 EDT --- With reference to bug #477044. This font spec needs very small corrections: 1. Remove the %define fontdir (in line 2) 2. Change %{fontdir} to %{_fontdir} in both the install commands (line 33 & 34) 3. Change the %files section altogether to the following (no %files directive needed): %_font_pkg *.ttf %doc Copyright LICENSE README %dir %{_fontdir} These changes should make the font compliant to new font packaging guidelines. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 04:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140457.n2E4vWHL026199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 00:57:33 EDT --- In the light of bug #477044: This font spec needs the following modifications: 1. Add "%define fontname linux-libertine" at the top 2. Remove "%define fontdir" directive (at line 2) 3. Change "Name: linux-libertine-fonts" to "Name: %{fontname}-fonts" 4. Replace all the remaining "%{fontdir}" with "%{_fontdir}" 5. Replace the "%files" section completely with (No %files directive): %_font_pkg *.ttf %doc Readme *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 05:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140536.n2E5a71B029333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 01:36:06 EDT --- Offering help, with respect to bug #477044. The following changes are needed in the SPEC file: 1. Remove the "%define fontdir" and "%define fontconfdir" (line 2 & 3) 2. Add "%define fontconf 65-%{fontname}" at the top 3. Add "BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13" 4. Replace all the remaining "%{fontdir}" with "%{_fontdir}" 5. Change "install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{fontconfdir}/65-%{fontname}.conf" to: install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p ${SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-fonts.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}-fonts.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done 6. Remove all the %post and %postun sections 7. Replace the whole %files section to: %_font_pkg -f 65-%{fontname}.conf *.ttf %dir %{_fontdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 05:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140539.n2E5dmKZ029642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #6 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 01:39:48 EDT --- Additionally: 4. Add "BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13" 5. Remove both %post and %postun sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 05:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140540.n2E5eQoO000644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #6 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 01:40:26 EDT --- Also, 6. Add "BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13" 7. Remove both %post and %postun sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 05:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140551.n2E5pjsJ031664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 01:51:45 EDT --- For bug #477044. These changes are required in the spec file: 1. Remove "%define fontdir" 2. Add "BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13" 3. Change all the remaining "%{fontdir}" to "%{_fontdir}" 4. Remove both %post and %postun sections 5. Replace the whole %files section with: %_font_pkg *.ttf %doc *.txt %dir %{_fontdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 06:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140604.n2E64Jt7000928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Rajeesh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-03-14 02:04:18 EDT --- For bug # 477044 The following changes are required in the spec: 1. Add "%define fontname tibetan-machine-uni" at the very beginning 2. Remobe "%define fontdir" directive 3. Add "BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel > 1.13" 4. Remove both %post and %postun sections 5. Replace all the remaining "%{fontdir}" with "%{_fontdir}" 6. Replace the whole %files section with: %_font_pkg *.ttf %doc COPYING README %dir %{_fontdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 09:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140925.n2E9PArw003436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Alexei Podtelezhnikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apodtele at ucsd.edu --- Comment #10 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-03-14 05:25:10 EDT --- This problem is greatly exaggerated!!! I was actually running F10 over freetype 2.3.8 since it was released. So I guess none of that long list of packages ever called `FT_Get_PS_Font_Info'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 09:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903140953.n2E9rJoa012108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #11 from Alexei Podtelezhnikov 2009-03-14 05:53:19 EDT --- I just realized this. Rawhide was massively rebuild against freetype 2.3.8. So, according to this bug report, rawhide is not compatible with new 2.3.9 right now and we should see the hell on earth. Luckily these long lists of packages have nothing to do with freetype directly. The announcement recommends to "search for the substrings `PS_FontInfo' and PS_Font_Info' in your source code". I kinda feel that would be pango, fontconfig, and just a handful of others. Or just do another mass-rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 13:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903141318.n2EDIAHm017333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-14 09:18:09 EDT --- It works on my rawhide system with rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.4.fc11.x86_64 yum-3.2.21-15.fc11.noarch Thank you for fixing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Sat Mar 14 14:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 347237] Making Pango use a given cairo_font_face_t In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090314142611.DA6EE23F52E@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237 pango | general | Ver: unspecified Scott Percival changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pleasebanme at gmail.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347237. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 18:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490281] Bold font too bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903141849.n2EInKXx009334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 --- Comment #1 from Sachin Garg 2009-03-14 14:49:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335221) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335221) screenshot from ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 18:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490281] New: Bold font too bold Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Bold font too bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 Summary: Bold font too bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: ascii79 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=335220) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335220) screenshot from fedora Description of problem: In fedora the bold fonts are too bold compared to the same font in ubuntu. This makes bold letter sightly unreadable. I have attached two screenshot one from ubuntu and other from fedora. You can see the difference Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 18:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903141852.n2EIqYsH010060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-14 14:52:33 EDT --- Another pass: 1. you're not defining fontname as intended by the template and as a result you have weird package names such as gnu-free-fonts-mono-fonts instead of a nice gnu-free-mono-fonts fontname shoud not have the same value as name or we would not bother with it 2. your fontconfig symlinks are broken lrw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 mars 14 19:35 /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf -> /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-fonts-m ono -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 334 mars 5 21:46 /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-gnu-free-fonts-mono.conf It would probably simpler if you just used the symlinking logic proposed by the template 3. Your compat package Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release} But your srpm generates subpackages named differently, so it won't work 4. rpmlint points some minor problems W: spelling-error-in-description compatability compatibility E: description-line-too-long This package only exists to help transition pre 20090104-4 freefotn users to the new\ W: summary-not-capitalized freefont compatibility package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sat Mar 14 19:06:00 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.52, 1.53 dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.98, 1.99 import.log, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.52, 1.53 Message-ID: <20090314190600.0DCD77012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30004/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore dejavu-fonts.spec import.log sources Log Message: 2.29 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.52 retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -r1.52 -r1.53 --- .cvsignore 21 Dec 2008 17:18:47 -0000 1.52 +++ .cvsignore 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.53 @@ -1 +1 @@ -dejavu-fonts-2.28.tar.bz2 +dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2 Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.98 retrieving revision 1.99 diff -u -r1.98 -r1.99 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 11:21:21 -0000 1.98 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.99 @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts -Version: 2.28 -Release: 6%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Version: 2.29 +Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -242,8 +242,12 @@ %changelog -* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.28-6 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild +* Sat Mar 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot +- 2.29-1 + +* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering +- 2.28-6 +??? Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.28-5 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:29:58 -0000 1.13 +++ import.log 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.14 @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.src.rpm:1232147011 dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218 dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235377773 +dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.52 retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -r1.52 -r1.53 --- sources 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 -0000 1.52 +++ sources 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.53 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fff585e19115dbe76746f6df66ab0dc6 dejavu-fonts-2.28.tar.bz2 +4728d26da8daa5b4ebe87c428d745b06 dejavu-fonts-2.29.tar.bz2 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 20:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903142052.n2EKqOWn032449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #12 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-14 16:52:24 EDT --- Alexei, the scope and implications of this bug are very well understood. Please don't add comments that do not add any information. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 21:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903142105.n2EL5giV005278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 --- Comment #13 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-14 17:05:42 EDT --- After inspecting the ABI-breaking change in 2.3.8, I'm fairly confident that we don't need to recompile any of the packages. 2.3.7->2.3.8 could cause memory corruption, but 2.3.8->2.3.9 is fairly safe. I'll ask 2.3.9 to be tagged in F11 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Sat Mar 14 23:00:30 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec, 1.127, 1.128 sources, 1.42, 1.43 Message-ID: <20090314230030.6D9DB7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5398 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3 - New tarball with version fixed in the header Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.127 retrieving revision 1.128 diff -u -r1.127 -r1.128 --- fontconfig.spec 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 -0000 1.127 +++ fontconfig.spec 14 Mar 2009 22:59:59 -0000 1.128 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig Version: 2.6.99.behdad -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3 +- New tarball with version fixed in the header + * Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-2 - Previous tarball was broken. Rebuild with respinned ball. Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.42 retrieving revision 1.43 diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43 --- sources 13 Mar 2009 23:11:08 -0000 1.42 +++ sources 14 Mar 2009 23:00:00 -0000 1.43 @@ -1 +1 @@ -1e713a359867608d7733ebec47b9daaf fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz +eec83c56829148d5511d5b896339bb25 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 00:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade apanov-edrip-fonts, due to i18n provide issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150008.n2F08gFe032688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #21 from Herbert Carl Meyer 2009-03-14 20:08:41 EDT --- also fixed by yum -15. Thank you for a very interesting discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org Sun Mar 15 02:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org (bugzilla-daemon at mozilla.org) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:15:08 -0700 Subject: [Bug 70132] Support @font-face In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150215.n2F2F8Tf013937@mrapp52.mozilla.org> Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #184 from David Baron [:dbaron] 2009-03-14 19:14:02 PDT --- I filed the checksum issue as bug 483459. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 03:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490281] Bold font too bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150312.n2F3CuiX030543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from sangu 2009-03-14 23:12:56 EDT --- Duplicated bug 485685 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 12:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490331] New: Crash of galeon in libpango Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Crash of galeon in libpango https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 Summary: Crash of galeon in libpango Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: jan.kratochvil at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Trying to run galeon in a virtual machine with minimal set of rpms/libraries I get a NULL dereference in libpango. (It also may be due to some missing resources not covered by rpm dependencies requirements.) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.23.0-4.g5317893.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. ssh -X kvm-virtual-machine 2. gdb galeon 3. run Actual results: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora (6.8.50.20090302-9.fc11) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: ... (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/galeon [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] warning: Unable to get location for thread creation breakpoint: generic error Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display "localhost:10.0". Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "gnomebreakpad": libgnomebreakpad.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module": libcanberra-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Detaching after fork from child process 2200. Detaching after fork from child process 2203. ** (galeon:2197): WARNING **: Failed to instantiate LoginManager Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. pango_fc_patterns_get_font_pattern (i=, pats=) at pangofc-fontmap.c:727 727 if (i < pats->fontset->nfont) Missing separate debuginfos, use: [...] (gdb) l 722 pats->match = NULL; 723 } 724 } 725 } 726 727 if (i < pats->fontset->nfont) 728 return pats->fontset->fonts[i]; 729 else 730 return NULL; 731 } (gdb) p pats $1 = (gdb) x/5i $rip 0x7ffff3f7715e : cmp (%rax),%ebp 0x7ffff3f77160 : jge 0x7ffff3f77122 0x7ffff3f77162 : mov 0x8(%rax),%rax 0x7ffff3f77166 : movslq %ebp,%rbp 0x7ffff3f77169 : mov (%rax,%rbp,8),%rdx (gdb) p/x $rax $2 = 0x0 (gdb) Expected results: No crash. Additional info: GConf2-2.25.2-3.fc11.x86_64 ORBit2-2.14.16-3.fc11.x86_64 alsa-lib-1.0.19-3.fc11.x86_64 atk-1.25.2-2.fc11.x86_64 avahi-0.6.24-2.fc11.x86_64 avahi-glib-0.6.24-2.fc11.x86_64 cairo-1.8.6-2.fc11.x86_64 dbus-glib-0.80-2.fc11.x86_64 dbus-libs-1.2.4.4permissive-4.fc11.x86_64 e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.4-5.fc11.x86_64 expat-2.0.1-6.x86_64 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64 freetype-2.3.9-1.fc11.x86_64 galeon-2.0.7-7.fc11.x86_64 glib2-2.19.10-2.fc11.x86_64 glibc-2.9.90-10.x86_64 glibc-common-2.9.90-10.x86_64 gnome-desktop-2.25.92-2.fc11.x86_64 gnome-keyring-2.25.92-1.fc11.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-2.24.0-5.fc11.x86_64 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-4.fc11.x86_64 gtk2-2.16.0-1.fc11.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.2-5.fc11.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.6.3-18.fc11.x86_64 libICE-1.0.4-7.fc11.x86_64 libSM-1.1.0-4.fc11.x86_64 libX11-1.2-3.fc11.x86_64 libXau-1.0.4-4.fc11.x86_64 libXcomposite-0.4.0-7.fc11.x86_64 libXcursor-1.1.9-4.fc11.x86_64 libXdamage-1.1.1-6.fc11.x86_64 libXext-1.0.99.1-2.fc11.x86_64 libXfixes-4.0.3-5.fc11.x86_64 libXi-1.2.1-1.fc11.x86_64 libXinerama-1.0.3-4.fc11.x86_64 libXrandr-1.2.99.4-3.fc11.x86_64 libXrender-0.9.4-5.fc11.x86_64 libXt-1.0.5-2.fc11.x86_64 libart_lgpl-2.3.20-4.fc11.x86_64 libbonobo-2.24.0-4.fc11.x86_64 libbonoboui-2.24.0-3.fc11.x86_64 libcap-2.10-2.fc10.x86_64 libgcc-4.4.0-0.26.x86_64 libglade2-2.6.3-4.fc11.x86_64 libgnome-2.24.1-10.fc11.x86_64 libgnomecanvas-2.25.90-3.fc11.x86_64 libgnomeui-2.24.0-4.fc11.x86_64 libjpeg-6b-45.fc11.x86_64 libpng-1.2.35-1.fc11.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.79-1.fc11.x86_64 libstdc++-4.4.0-0.26.x86_64 libxcb-1.2-2.fc11.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.3-2.fc11.x86_64 nspr-4.7.3-5.fc11.x86_64 nss-3.12.2.0-4.fc11.x86_64 openssl-0.9.8j-9.fc11.x86_64 pango-1.23.0-4.g5317893.fc11.x86_64 pixman-0.14.0-2.fc11.x86_64 popt-1.13-5.fc11.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.10-4.fc11.x86_64 startup-notification-0.9-6.fc11.x86_64 xulrunner-1.9.1-0.10.beta3.fc11.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-20.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mgarski at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 13:01:37 2009 From: mgarski at fedoraproject.org (Marcin Garski) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel sources, 1.3, 1.4 tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090315130138.194C47012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mgarski Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28598 Modified Files: sources tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Update to 1.901b - Update URL - Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh (#477467) Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 29 Dec 2007 20:13:47 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Mar 2009 13:01:02 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -c3be88f52fd15d940259c1d0e2a45142 TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip +00baf42dd4609f1db8fab40bc3bd4f5c TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip Index: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 20:33:47 -0000 1.4 +++ tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:01:02 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,18 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/tibetan-machine-uni +%define fontname tibetan-machine-uni -Name: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.901 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ -URL: http://www.thdl.org/tools/toolbox/index.php?#wiki=/wiki/site/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/tibetan%20machine%20uni.html -Source0: https://collab.itc.virginia.edu/access//content/group/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/Tibetan%20fonts/Tibetan%20Unicode%20Fonts/TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +URL: http://www.thlib.org/tools/#wiki=/access/wiki/site/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/tibetan%20machine%20uni.html +Source0: https://collab.itc.virginia.edu/access/content/group/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/Tibetan%20fonts/Tibetan%20Unicode%20Fonts/TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel %description Tibetan Machine Uni is an TrueType OpenType, Unicode font released by THDL @@ -25,35 +26,27 @@ # Empty build section %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -p -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} tr -d '\r' < gpl.txt > COPYING tr -d '\r' < ReadMe.txt > README -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%_font_pkg *.ttf %doc COPYING README -%{fontdir}/ +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Marcin Garski 1.901-3 +- Update to 1.901b +- Update URL +- Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh (#477467) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.901-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 13:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151307.n2FD7KNF002089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477467, which changed state. Bug 477467 Summary: [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 13:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151307.n2FD7JoF002056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Marcin Garski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.901-3 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Marcin Garski 2009-03-15 09:07:19 EDT --- Fixed in 1.901-3, thanks Rajeesh for help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mgarski at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 13:12:54 2009 From: mgarski at fedoraproject.org (Marcin Garski) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10 sources, 1.3, 1.4 tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090315131254.D147C7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mgarski Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30367 Modified Files: sources tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Update to 1.901b - Update URL - Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh (#477467) Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sources 29 Dec 2007 20:13:47 -0000 1.3 +++ sources 15 Mar 2009 13:12:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -1 +1 @@ -c3be88f52fd15d940259c1d0e2a45142 TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip +00baf42dd4609f1db8fab40bc3bd4f5c TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip Index: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 29 Dec 2007 20:13:47 -0000 1.3 +++ tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:12:24 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/tibetan-machine-uni +%define fontname tibetan-machine-uni -Name: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.901 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ -URL: http://www.thdl.org/tools/toolbox/index.php?#wiki=/wiki/site/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/tibetan%20machine%20uni.html -Source0: https://collab.itc.virginia.edu/access//content/group/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/Tibetan%20fonts/Tibetan%20Unicode%20Fonts/TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +URL: http://www.thlib.org/tools/#wiki=/access/wiki/site/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/tibetan%20machine%20uni.html +Source0: https://collab.itc.virginia.edu/access/content/group/26a34146-33a6-48ce-001e-f16ce7908a6a/Tibetan%20fonts/Tibetan%20Unicode%20Fonts/TibetanMachineUnicodeFont.zip +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Tibetan Machine Uni is an TrueType OpenType, Unicode font released by THDL @@ -25,35 +27,27 @@ # Empty build section %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -p -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} tr -d '\r' < gpl.txt > COPYING tr -d '\r' < ReadMe.txt > README -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%_font_pkg *.ttf %doc COPYING README -%{fontdir}/ +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Marcin Garski 1.901-3 +- Update to 1.901b +- Update URL +- Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh (#477467) + * Sat Dec 29 2007 Marcin Garski 1.901-1 - Update to 1.901 From mgarski at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 13:14:03 2009 From: mgarski at fedoraproject.org (Marcin Garski) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10 tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090315131403.F0EA97012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mgarski Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30559 Modified Files: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Typo in changelog Index: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/F-10/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:12:24 -0000 1.4 +++ tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:13:33 -0000 1.5 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog -* Sun Mar 15 2009 Marcin Garski 1.901-3 +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Marcin Garski 1.901-2 - Update to 1.901b - Update URL - Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh (#477467) From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 13:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151313.n2FDDTj1003227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil 2009-03-15 09:13:28 EDT --- The crash gets workarounded by installing: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 libXfont ttmkfdir xorg-x11-font-utils (fontconfig fonts dependency is Bug 438006 / Bug 257901 but is should not crash) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mgarski at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 13:26:59 2009 From: mgarski at fedoraproject.org (Marcin Garski) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel jomolhari-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090315132659.D3D007012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mgarski Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32550 Modified Files: jomolhari-fonts.spec Log Message: - Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh K Nambiar (#477403) Index: jomolhari-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jomolhari-fonts/devel/jomolhari-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- jomolhari-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 09:35:56 -0000 1.4 +++ jomolhari-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:26:29 -0000 1.5 @@ -1,17 +1,19 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/jomolhari +%define fontname jomolhari -Name: jomolhari-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.003 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha Group: User Interface/X License: OFL URL: http://chris.fynn.googlepages.com/jomolhari -Source0: http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/free-tibetan/jomolhari/jomolhari-alpha003c.zip -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +Source0: http://chris.fynn.googlepages.com/jomolhari-alpha003c.zip +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Jomolhari is an TrueType OpenType Bhutanese style font for Dzongkha and @@ -26,10 +28,10 @@ # Empty build section %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf %{buildroot} -install -d -m 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -p -m 0644 *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} +install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} for i in FONTLOG.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt do @@ -37,27 +39,17 @@ mv -f ${i}.tmp $i done -%post -if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts -fi - -%postun -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then - if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then - %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts - fi -fi - %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr %{buildroot} -%files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%_font_pkg *.ttf %doc FONTLOG.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt -%{fontdir}/ +%dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Marcin Garski 0.003-7 +- Update to new fonts guidelines, thanks to Rajeesh K Nambiar (#477403) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.003-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 13:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151332.n2FDWoBb007343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477403, which changed state. Bug 477403 Summary: [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 13:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151332.n2FDWncc007311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Marcin Garski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.003-7 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Marcin Garski 2009-03-15 09:32:49 EDT --- Fixed in 0.003-7, thanks Rajeesh for help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mgarski at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 13:35:14 2009 From: mgarski at fedoraproject.org (Marcin Garski) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090315133514.6138A7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mgarski Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1801 Modified Files: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec Log Message: - Add missing Requires Index: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts/devel/tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:01:02 -0000 1.5 +++ tibetan-machine-uni-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 13:34:43 -0000 1.6 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description Tibetan Machine Uni is an TrueType OpenType, Unicode font released by THDL From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 17:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151709.n2FH9JUC006990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-15 13:09:19 EDT --- Will be fixed when pango 1.24.0 hits rawhide today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 18:46:37 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 linux-libertine-fonts.spec, 1.11, 1.12 Message-ID: <20090315184637.505447012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20797/devel Modified Files: import.log linux-libertine-fonts.spec Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 3 Sep 2008 21:23:24 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 18:46:06 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ linux-libertine-fonts-2_7_9-2_fc10:HEAD:linux-libertine-fonts-2.7.9-2.fc10.src.rpm:1220476988 +linux-libertine-fonts-4_1_8-3_fc11:HEAD:linux-libertine-fonts-4.1.8-3.fc11.src.rpm:1237142709 Index: linux-libertine-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/linux-libertine-fonts/devel/linux-libertine-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12 --- linux-libertine-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 20:32:48 -0000 1.11 +++ linux-libertine-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 18:46:06 -0000 1.12 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: linux-libertine-fonts Version: 4.1.8 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: Linux Libertine Open Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ with exceptions or OFL @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 4.1.8-3 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.1.8-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 18:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151845.n2FIjSsa020541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(felix.schwarz at oss | |.schwarz.eu) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 14:45:28 EDT --- The package seems pretty nice and clean. However: 1. your fontconfig file references the "sans" generic but fontconfig people seem to prefer "sans-serif" 2. please update the associated wiki page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist as demanded by our font packaging workflow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 18:52:30 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.99, 1.100 import.log, 1.14, 1.15 Message-ID: <20090315185230.21D3A7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22106/devel Modified Files: dejavu-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: dejavu-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.99 retrieving revision 1.100 diff -u -r1.99 -r1.100 --- dejavu-fonts.spec 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.99 +++ dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 18:51:58 -0000 1.100 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.29 -Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist} Summary: DejaVu fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -242,6 +242,9 @@ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.29-2 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Sat Mar 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.29-1 Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15 --- import.log 14 Mar 2009 19:05:29 -0000 1.14 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 18:51:59 -0000 1.15 @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234084218 dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:1235377773 dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458 +dejavu-fonts-2_29-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237143073 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 18:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151855.n2FItrB8023943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 14:55:54 EDT --- %dir %{_fontdir} is not necessary anymore, too many people had problems with it, so the fedora macros were changed not to require it (at the expense of a minor directory ownership optimization) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 18:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151859.n2FIxcor024423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |490364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 18:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490364] New: Package does not build in rawhide Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package does not build in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490364 Summary: Package does not build in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: linux-libertine-fonts AssignedTo: frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 477418 Classification: Fedora Package does not build in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94189 Probably due to: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 19:09:30 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 Message-ID: <20090315190930.2A4A37012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24468/devel Modified Files: import.log oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 1 Feb 2009 08:55:25 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 19:08:59 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-3_fc10:HEAD:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233478160 +oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2_0_2-5_fc11:HEAD:oldstandard-sfd-fonts-2.0.2-5.fc11.src.rpm:1237144107 Index: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 26 Feb 2009 08:03:34 -0000 1.2 +++ oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 19:08:59 -0000 1.3 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir}/ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.0.2-5 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.0.2-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 19:16:34 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel apanov-edrip-fonts.spec, 1.6, 1.7 import.log, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090315191634.1E4817012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26171/devel Modified Files: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: apanov-edrip-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/apanov-edrip-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 01:19:20 -0000 1.6 +++ apanov-edrip-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 19:16:03 -0000 1.7 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20081007 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: A decorative contrast sans-serif font Group: User Interface/X @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ %doc *.txt README %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20081007-8 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20081007-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-edrip-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:26:11 -0000 1.4 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 19:16:03 -0000 1.5 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-4.fc11.src.rpm:1234085608 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235299600 apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-6.fc11.src.rpm:1235377546 +apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8_fc11:HEAD:apanov-edrip-fonts-20081007-8.fc11.src.rpm:1237144512 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151913.n2FJDUZb025182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 15:13:30 EDT --- Some minor nitpicking: 1. it'd be a good idea to add some fontconfig rules to the package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F 2. it's better to "fix" txt files in %prep, preserving their timestamp (many examples in gfs fonts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477467] [tibetan-machine-uni-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151919.n2FJJNrx026087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 15:19:22 EDT --- Same minor nitpicking as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403#c7 Nevertheless it's mostly fine and Rajeesh gave you good advice. Thanks Rajeesh! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 19:26:24 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/sj-fonts/devel import.log,1.1,1.2 sj-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090315192624.9D32B7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sj-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27768/devel Modified Files: import.log sj-fonts.spec Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 27 Jan 2009 22:07:50 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 19:25:54 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ sj-fonts-2_0_2-1_fc10:HEAD:sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm:1233094032 +sj-fonts-2_0_2-4_fc11:HEAD:sj-fonts-2.0.2-4.fc11.src.rpm:1237144996 Index: sj-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/sj-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- sj-fonts.spec 28 Feb 2009 20:04:45 -0000 1.3 +++ sj-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 19:25:54 -0000 1.4 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 2.0.2 -Release: 3%{?dist} +Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Two fonts by Steve Jordi released under the GPL Group: User Interface/X @@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.0.2-4 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Sat Feb 28 2009 Sven Lankes - 2.0.2-3 - Adjust fontforge call to fix ftbfs From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151924.n2FJOrxi028688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 15:24:53 EDT --- Actually this is a multi-font package so it needs to be split (maybe keeping the same srpm, but probably easier just to create separate ones) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151929.n2FJT2ht027589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 15:29:02 EDT --- Since this package includes many different font families, it needs splitting. So the needed changes are more extensive However at this stage there are many multi-font packages in rawhide one can look at for examples, if the templates are not clear enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151932.n2FJWMX3030095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #8 from Marcin Garski 2009-03-15 15:32:23 EDT --- 1. I've already tried to do this, but I still have problem with font family. See: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2008-December/msg00015.html 2. Will fix this in next release, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151932.n2FJWmsS028317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 15:32:47 EDT --- %dir %{_fontdir} is not 100% necessary, and there's no real need to loop on a single fontconfig file, but the advice seems generally sane Thanks Rajeesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490369] New: Package does not build in rawhide Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package does not build in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 Summary: Package does not build in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: oldstandard-sfd-fonts AssignedTo: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Package does not build in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94195 Probably due to: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490371] New: Package does not build in rawhide Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package does not build in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 Summary: Package does not build in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cf-bonveno-fonts AssignedTo: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Package does not build in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1242354 Probably due to: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] New: Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Summary: Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora It seems lohi releases went away, including the sources of Fedora's latest package :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 19:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] New: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Summary: Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora We advocate building fonts from sources but do not do it for lohit which is a Red Hat/Fedora font project. Please make the lohit package generate fonts from sfds (as the dejavu people showed, regular building from sources helps improve both fonts and font tools) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 20:04:31 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec, 1.7, 1.8 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 Message-ID: <20090315200431.93FE97012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1590/devel Modified Files: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 01:20:13 -0000 1.7 +++ apanov-heuristica-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 20:04:01 -0000 1.8 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 20090125 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Heuristica font Group: User Interface/X @@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 20090125-5 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 20090125-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/apanov-heuristica-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 --- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:27:24 -0000 1.5 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 20:04:01 -0000 1.6 @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-1.fc11.src.rpm:1233345796 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235299849 apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-3.fc11.src.rpm:1235377618 +apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-5_fc11:HEAD:apanov-heuristica-fonts-20090125-5.fc11.src.rpm:1237147311 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 20:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152003.n2FK3cR9000987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l |needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.c |aposte.net) |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 20:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152007.n2FK7IUN003251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 20:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152007.n2FK7JGN003281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477481, which changed state. Bug 477481 Summary: [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 20:11:55 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, 1.2, 1.3 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090315201155.3887A7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2779/devel Modified Files: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 07:04:31 -0000 1.2 +++ cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 20:11:24 -0000 1.3 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir}/ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.1-5 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 20:11:24 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:HEAD:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233214810 +cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-5_fc11:HEAD:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-5.fc11.src.rpm:1237147830 From nim at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 20:17:54 2009 From: nim at fedoraproject.org (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel import.log, 1.1, 1.2 serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090315201754.25AF47012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4351/devel Modified Files: import.log serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec Log Message: Try to build with F11 fontforge Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 13 Jan 2009 21:33:38 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 15 Mar 2009 20:17:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5-1_fc10:HEAD:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm:1231882386 +serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5_1-2_fc11:HEAD:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237148225 Index: serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel/serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec 28 Feb 2009 18:30:03 -0000 1.3 +++ serafettin-cartoon-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 20:17:23 -0000 1.4 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.5.1 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Sans-serif Cartoon Fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2+ @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ %changelog +* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 0.5.1-2 +??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge + * Sat Feb 28 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 0.5.1-1 - New version with cleanups and fixes From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 20:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490369] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152030.n2FKUGTM006704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-15 16:30:17 EDT --- hi, adding the --lang==ff makes the build fail on my system.. so the srpm wont build.. How do i make this change ? switch to rawhide ? same for #490371 regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 21:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490369] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152102.n2FL2E1O011280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 17:02:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > hi, Hi, > adding the --lang==ff makes the build fail on my system.. so the srpm wont > build.. How do i make this change ? switch to rawhide ? You can test-build packages targeting rawhide on a pre-rawhide system by installing mock http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock If you don't want to install mock, you can also use the scratch feature of koji to submit test builds that won't be pushed to anyone else http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji#Scratch_Builds this option is easier but only works for approved packagers (like you are now) and will be slowed down by your network connection to the build farm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 21:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490371] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152102.n2FL2OGv009924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-15 17:02:23 EDT --- having trouble tagging the new cvs module that ive uploaded.. [Package at Ankur devel]$ make tag cvs tag -c cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-7_fc11 cvs tag: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec is locally modified cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 ill figure it out and do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 21:08:31 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4 Message-ID: <20090315210831.CD5F47012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11964 Modified Files: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - made changes to make the package build with rawhides fontforge Index: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 19:08:59 -0000 1.3 +++ oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:08:00 -0000 1.4 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE2} . %build -fontforge -script "-" OldStandard*.sfd < - 2.0.2-6 +- changed in accordance with #490369 * Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.0.2-5 ??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 21:11:32 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec, 1.4, 1.5 Message-ID: <20090315211132.71CB87012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12474 Modified Files: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - bumped release to correct tag error Index: oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oldstandard-sfd-fonts/devel/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:08:00 -0000 1.4 +++ oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:11:02 -0000 1.5 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-sfd-fonts Version: 2.0.2 -Release: 6%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ %dir %{_fontdir}/ %changelog -* Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-6 + +* Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 2.0.2-7 - changed in accordance with #490369 * Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 2.0.2-5 ??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 21:19:06 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090315211906.9D3277012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13617 Modified Files: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - Changed to make package build with fontforge present in rawhide Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 20:11:24 -0000 1.3 +++ cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:18:36 -0000 1.4 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 7%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ done %build -fontforge -script "-" BonvenoCF*.sfd < - 1.1-7 +- Changed according to #490371 + * Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.1-5 ??? Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 15 21:21:41 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090315212141.67E4E7012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14431 Modified Files: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec Log Message: * Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - bumped release number to correct tag error Index: cf-bonveno-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:18:36 -0000 1.4 +++ cf-bonveno-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 21:21:10 -0000 1.5 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 7%{?dist} +Release: 8%{?dist} Summary: A fun font by Barry Schwartz Group: User Interface/X @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ %dir %{_fontdir}/ %changelog -* Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-7 +* Mon Mar 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1-8 - Changed according to #490371 * Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.1-5 From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 21:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490369] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152129.n2FLTGSx013729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-15 17:29:16 EDT --- hi, closed ? Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 21:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490371] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152129.n2FLT0BM013706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-15 17:29:00 EDT --- hi, do i close this bug now ? Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 21:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490371] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152141.n2FLfR9a016994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-15 17:41:28 EDT --- if they're now built in koji, sure, you can close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 02:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903160226.n2G2QA2f025162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480470, which changed state. Bug 480470 Summary: [publican] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 02:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903160226.n2G2Q97Q025132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 Jeff Fearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Jeff Fearn 2009-03-15 22:26:08 EDT --- publican 0.44 is built in rawhide with these changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 10:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490371] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161035.n2GAZbuI010038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490371 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 10:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490369] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161035.n2GAZKZm012825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490369 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 15:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161532.n2GFWSbO014234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, mclasen at redhat.com Component|gdm |pango AssignedTo|jmccann at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-16 11:32:27 EDT --- Which pango do you have ? This is supposedly fixed with the latest pango in rawhide. I thought I asked Behdad to file a ticket to get it tagged, but maybe not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 17:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161735.n2GHZVL2007312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 18:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161803.n2GI31Ls013658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #45 from Jesse Keating 2009-03-16 14:02:59 EDT --- Rawhide should be installable, what I need is a clear idea if this is really a beta blocker issue or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 18:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161814.n2GIEvFC016022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-16 14:14:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Rawhide should be installable, what I need is a clear idea if this is really a > beta blocker issue or not. Well, I tried the current fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11 and it seems be working for me. So tagging this fontconfig as f11-beta may be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 20:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162011.n2GKBfHb011016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 20:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162011.n2GKBK9U010889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-16 16:11:17 EDT --- I seem to have missed this update, sorry, should have looked at it way before. This package looks a lot more sane, but it still has the following mistakes 1. you're not buildrequiring fontforge, so it won't build. Please check your packages in mock or a koji scratch build before submitting 2. will probably need the same change as other packages to build on rawhide fontforge 3. I don't think you need to put sfd everywhere, unless the author requested it like for old standard 4. no idea if using %{common_desc} instead of %common_desc will have bad side-effects or not 5. you're not using the suggested fontconf form, it needs to be something like number-%{fontname} to work. To choose the right number see /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-priorities.txt 6. It's considered bad form to mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in a single template 7. be careful to put your doc in the common subpackage, not the main package 8. you can put the "beteckna" font in the main package as it's named "beteckna" not "beteckna general". Look how the "gentium basic" package does it. The fontconfig file probably needs to be adapted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 21:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162148.n2GLmmQP030731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(felix.schwarz at oss | |.schwarz.eu) | --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-16 17:48:48 EDT --- I updated the existing wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tuffy_fonts (is this level of detail ok with you? - I am still new to font packaging) I can update the package in a few days (currently I'm swamped). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 21:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162146.n2GLkZwN030522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.e | |u --- Comment #28 from Felix Schwarz 2009-03-16 17:46:34 EDT --- Probably you should also update the wiki page as this font has at least a pkgdb page now: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Gentium_Basic_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 22:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162209.n2GM9L1K032705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #47 from Jesse Keating 2009-03-16 18:09:20 EDT --- We just tagged so I'll close this rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 22:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489928] FreeType 2.3.8 is not binary compatible to version 2.3.7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162219.n2GMJaLI002261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489928 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-16 18:19:35 EDT --- Tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Mon Mar 16 23:17:45 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.84, 1.85 pango.spec, 1.156, 1.157 sources, 1.85, 1.86 pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch, 1.2, NONE Message-ID: <20090316231746.2B6227012E@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20844 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Removed Files: pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch Log Message: * Mon Mar 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-1 - Update to 1.24.0 - Package pango-view.1.gz Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.84 retrieving revision 1.85 diff -u -r1.84 -r1.85 --- .cvsignore 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.84 +++ .cvsignore 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.85 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2 +pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.156 retrieving revision 1.157 diff -u -r1.156 -r1.157 --- pango.spec 11 Mar 2009 17:32:32 -0000 1.156 +++ pango.spec 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.157 @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.23.0 -Release: 4.g5317893%{?dist} +Version: 1.24.0 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries -Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.23/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 +Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 URL: http://www.pango.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ # Look for pango.modules in an arch-specific directory Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch -Patch1: pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch - %description Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis on internationalization. Pango can be used anywhere that text layout is needed, @@ -77,8 +75,6 @@ %patch0 -p1 -b .lib64 -%patch1 -p1 -b .git - %build %configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references --with-included-modules=basic-fc @@ -212,6 +208,7 @@ %{_libdir}/libpango*-*.so.* %{_bindir}/pango-querymodules* %{_bindir}/pango-view +%{_datadir}/man/man1/pango-view.1.gz %{_libdir}/pango %doc %{_mandir}/man1/* @@ -228,6 +225,10 @@ %changelog +* Mon Mar 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-1 +- Update to 1.24.0 +- Package pango-view.1.gz + * Wed Mar 11 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.23.0-4.g5317893 - Push changes from git Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.85 retrieving revision 1.86 diff -u -r1.85 -r1.86 --- sources 3 Feb 2009 16:12:07 -0000 1.85 +++ sources 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.86 @@ -1 +1 @@ -358a87607c0a5b4889bab52b1cf5e921 pango-1.23.0.tar.bz2 +d209f41079833cd2ef2c5e580ab9c5ee pango-1.24.0.tar.bz2 --- pango-1.23.0-g5317893.patch DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 23:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903162333.n2GNXo4Z015183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-16 19:33:49 EDT --- Built 1.24.0 and filed a ticket for it to be tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 03:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170321.n2H3Lh0c022137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |RiordonFancy-fonts - A |oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A |stylized font |stylized font Flag|needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #2 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-03-16 23:21:41 EDT --- Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts/oflb-riordonfancy-fonts-4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490583] New: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490583 Summary: Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: padauk-fonts AssignedTo: mvaliyav at redhat.com ReportedBy: devel at thanlwinsoft.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mvaliyav at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The package is packaging fonts from the font-source directory which have no Graphite or OpenType font tables. This means that most Myanmar words render completely wrongly. Please use Padauk.ttf and Padauk-Bold.ttf NOT padauk-src.ttf and padaukbold-src.ttf. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.4-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.type a Myanmar word in gedit e.g. ?????? Actual results: The wrap U+103C is rendered around the second consonant, which is wrong. Expected results: The wrap U+103C should be around the first consonant Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170551.n2H5pua9014273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-17 01:51:55 EDT --- Peter: I think we are waiting for the submission to be updated to the new Fonts Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 06:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170655.n2H6tR4K022038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-17 02:55:26 EDT --- imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 06:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170657.n2H6v4Xh024096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 10:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490610] New: [mr_IN][hi_IN] =?utf-8?q?_Anchoring_in_combinat?= =?utf-8?q?ion_=E0=A4=A6_+_=E0=A4=BC_looks_need_update?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination ? + ? looks need update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Summary: [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination ? + ? looks need update Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: low Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: in combination ???, ? with ? looks not proper Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.8-1 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.type above combination [U+0924, U+0926, U+093C] 2. 3. Actual results: nukta looks more nearer to ? Expected results: its should be nearer or at the bottom of ? Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 11:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489919] Unable to view any PS/EPS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171133.n2HBXBTu013403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489919 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Ngo Than 2009-03-17 07:33:10 EDT --- evince should show the warnnings if the fonts are missing. Perhaps the warnings were saved in the log files in your case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 12:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171207.n2HC788V018352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 Jan Kratochvil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |pango-1.24.0-1.fc11.x86_64 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil 2009-03-17 08:07:06 EDT --- Verified as no longer crashing. It just now prints: (galeon:10431): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='common' (galeon:10431): Pango-WARNING **: failed to choose a font, expect ugly output. engine-type='PangoRenderFc', script='latin' and a lot of: (galeon:10431): Pango-CRITICAL **: _pango_engine_shape_covers: assertion `PANGO_IS_FONT (font)' failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 12:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171224.n2HCOcpj021904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #3 from sangu 2009-03-17 08:24:36 EDT --- This issue happens by this patch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~behdad/fontconfig/commit/?id=10609af4aa4030a15c19573198462fa002d2ef13 < https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19904 > After removing the patch in /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf, embolden rendering of embeddedbitmap font becomes good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 15:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171536.n2HFaNYf008269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-17 11:36:21 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 16:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490331] Crash of galeon in libpango In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171621.n2HGLEdb020286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490331 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:21:12 EDT --- Thanks, fixed the assertion upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 16:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171625.n2HGPwKS025007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ascii79 at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:25:57 EDT --- *** Bug 490281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 16:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490281] Bold font too bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171625.n2HGPv88024974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490281 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 12:25:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Duplicated bug 485685 ? Quite possibly. Lets dupe. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 485685 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Mar 17 17:01:09 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.40, 1.41 fontconfig.spec, 1.128, 1.129 sources, 1.43, 1.44 Message-ID: <20090317170109.1F86870132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20694 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - * 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 - Resolves #485685 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.40 retrieving revision 1.41 diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41 --- .cvsignore 13 Mar 2009 22:29:39 -0000 1.40 +++ .cvsignore 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.41 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.128 retrieving revision 1.129 diff -u -r1.128 -r1.129 --- fontconfig.spec 14 Mar 2009 22:59:59 -0000 1.128 +++ fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.129 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad -Release: 3%{?dist} +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 +- Resolves #485685 + * Tue Mar 14 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad-3 - New tarball with version fixed in the header Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.43 retrieving revision 1.44 diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44 --- sources 14 Mar 2009 23:00:00 -0000 1.43 +++ sources 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.44 @@ -1 +1 @@ -eec83c56829148d5511d5b896339bb25 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.tar.gz +a5bdb5fa9bdfce0e06354f64307a23cc fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz From behdad at fedoraproject.org Tue Mar 17 17:04:47 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec,1.129,1.130 Message-ID: <20090317170447.CCC4470132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22020 Modified Files: fontconfig.spec Log Message: Fix date Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.129 retrieving revision 1.130 diff -u -r1.129 -r1.130 --- fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.129 +++ fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:04:17 -0000 1.130 @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog -* Tue Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1 +* Tue Mar 17 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 - Resolves #485685 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 17:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171703.n2HH3hMe029368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 Alexander Kahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kahl 2009-03-17 13:03:41 EDT --- Note regarding #4: 1.7.7-2 for both dist-10 and rawhide correctly {Build,}Requires the corresponding font packages so the update has been marked to fix this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 17:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171714.n2HHEtWf031749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-17 13:14:53 EDT --- hi, made the changes : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm tested the srpm using mock.. all processes returned 0 so im assuming it was a successful build.. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 17:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171716.n2HHGp9F005185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-17 13:16:50 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 which removes that patch. Requested it to be tagged for f11 beta. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 17:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171728.n2HHSe4k008137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #15 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-17 13:28:39 EDT --- hi, i got these in the output though.. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph igrave has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph iacute has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph icircumflex has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph idieresis has width 207 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of dotlessi which is 186. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Agrave has width 695 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of A which is 674. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Aring has width 695 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of A which is 674. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph Egrave has width 518 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of E which is 483. DEBUG: Bad sfd file. Glyph aring has width 476 even though it should be DEBUG: bound to the width of a which is 480. How do i handle these? Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 01:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180146.n2I1kHw4013279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-17 21:46:15 EDT --- It has ben tagged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 03:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490791] New: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490791 Summary: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: sangu.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=335641) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335641) boxs in yellow box Description of problem: cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. $cat ~/.xsession-errors [...] W[ 1237343148.899510]:Error while processing a value type NestedList: Error while processing a value type XFontSet: Unable to compose a value type XFontSet properly due to the size difference: expected size: 458, actual size: 460 W[ 1237343148.899859]:Error while processing a value type NestedList: Error while processing a value type XFontSet: Unable to compose a value type XFontSet properly due to the size difference: expected size: 458, actual size: 460 See http://www.mtvjapan.com/index.html. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11, 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. visits cjk webpage with flash object ( http://www.mtvjapan.com/index.html ) 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: No problem in 2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 03:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485685] Embolden Font with embeddedbitmap is ugly in firefox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180340.n2I3eBGb003260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485685 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc | |11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from sangu 2009-03-17 23:40:09 EDT --- Fixed in fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1.fc11 < http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=94516 > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 06:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490418] gdm language list choice dialog does not appear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180616.n2I6GMnf028667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490418 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-18 02:16:20 EDT --- Thanks seems to be working now in rawhide again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 08:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts AssignedTo: mathieu.bridon at gmail.com ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: johnp at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, mathieu.bridon at gmail.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should show all font names from Nafees font family Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install this font 2. open this font in fontforge 3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F) 4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields. Actual results: currently it shows font name as Nafees Expected results: Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha Additional info: Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 13:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] New: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 Summary: All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: mschmidt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Today I did 'yum update' on my Rawhide KVM guest. About 20 packages were updated, among them was fontconfig. After reboot to get the new kernel, all fonts in GDM were monospaced and without antialiasing. After logging in into GNOME everything was monospaced and no AA too (menus, window titles, gnome-terminal, ...). I thought I had lost my Preferences -> Appearance -> Fonts settings, so I went there to check, but all fonts appeared the same. The problem was fixed it by running 'fc-cache -r' and logging out and back in. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): The upgrade was from: fontconfig-2.6.97-5.g945d6a4.fc11.x86_64 to: fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: Not sure. I haven't tried downgrading and repeating the upgrade yet. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Update fontconfig 2. Reboot (although relogin would probably be sufficient) Actual results: All fonts are monospace and without antialiasing. Expected results: Font should look as they did before the upgrade. Additional info: I suspect the bug is in fontconfig's postinstall script where it does: rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/????????????????????????????????.cache-2 But at least on my system the number of question marks does not correspond to the actual filename lengths of the files in that directory. E.g. /var/cache/fontconfig/3830d5c3ddfd5cd38a049b759396e72e-x86-64.cache-2 (the "-x86-64" is not accounted for) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 13:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903181317.n2IDHu2Z022922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-18 09:17:53 EDT --- Fixed 1, 2, 3, and 4. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-8.fc10.src.rpm Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font pacakges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 13:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903181334.n2IDYZSY027338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-18 09:34:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Re the symlinks, why do we use absolute and not relative symlinks in font > pacakges? Because it's simpler and FPC already decided the rpmlint warning about absolute symlinks was trashable. But they're ok not requiring our rpmlint packager to remove it and having people waste their time in reviews over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 16:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490941] New: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490941 Summary: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: dejavu-fonts AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ReportedBy: john.ellson at comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: fc-match "times roman" results in a Sans font Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. fc-match "times roman" 2. 3. Actual results: DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" Expected results: DejaVuSerif.ttf: "DejaVu Serif" "Book" Additional info: Perhaps this should be fixed in fontconfig as well? Clearly (to the user) any font name beginning with "times" should return a Serif font. eg: fc-match times fc-match "times roman" fc-match "times new roman" fc-match "times-roman" fc-match "times-new-roman" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 17:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903181741.n2IHfn27019081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 13:41:45 EDT --- The rm is there to cleanup earlier naming convention where there was no arch in the file name. So that's not the issue. Did the update also update any font packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 19:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903181909.n2IJ9egT010888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 15:09:35 EDT --- php-ZendFramework-1.7.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ZendFramework'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2823 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 19:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903181914.n2IJE4T9010194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-18 15:14:00 EDT --- imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update imsettings'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2843 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 21:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182107.n2IL7iI1000797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 17:07:40 EDT --- Ok, I understand the bug now. Working on a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 21:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182116.n2ILGOtt005094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #15 from Michael 2009-03-18 17:16:20 EDT --- The update is unavailable yet: [root at ex ~]# rpm -qa | grep imsettings imsettings-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386 imsettings-libs-0.105.1-3.fc10.1.i386 [root at ex ~]# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update imsettings Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update [root at ex ~]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182336.n2INagRd028903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 19:36:38 EDT --- commit a03e7b11fbe9a4710575f27e8701fcd7fa902844 Author: Behdad Esfahbod Date: Wed Mar 18 19:28:52 2009 -0400 [fc-lang] Make LangSet representation in the cache files stable Fontconfig assigns an index number to each language it knows about. The index is used to index a bit in FcLangSet language map. The bit map is stored in the cache. Previously fc-lang simply sorted the list of languages and assigned them an index starting from zero. Net effect is that whenever new orth files were added, all the FcLangSet info in the cache files would become invalid. This was causing weird bugs like this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 With this commit we fix the index assigned to each language. The index will be based on the order the orth files are passed to fc-lang. As a result all orth files are explicitly listed in Makefile.am now, and new additions should be made to the end of the list. The list is made to reflect the sorted list of orthographies from 2.6.0 released followed by new additions since. This fixes the stability problem. Needless to say, recreating caches is necessary before any new orthography is recognized in existing fonts, but at least the existing caches are still valid and don't cause bugs like the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Wed Mar 18 23:43:50 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.41, 1.42 fontconfig.spec, 1.130, 1.131 sources, 1.44, 1.45 Message-ID: <20090318234351.08E3170132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32601 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 - Resolves #490888 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.41 retrieving revision 1.42 diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 --- .cvsignore 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.41 +++ .cvsignore 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.42 @@ -1 +1 @@ -fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz +fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz Index: fontconfig.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v retrieving revision 1.130 retrieving revision 1.131 diff -u -r1.130 -r1.131 --- fontconfig.spec 17 Mar 2009 17:04:17 -0000 1.130 +++ fontconfig.spec 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.131 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Summary: Font configuration and customization library Name: fontconfig -Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 +Version: 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 Release: 1%{?dist} License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries @@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Tue Mar 18 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1 +- Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090318 +- Resolves #490888 + * Tue Mar 17 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 2.6.99.behdad.20090317-1 - Update to 2.6.99.behdad.20090317 - Resolves #485685 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.44 retrieving revision 1.45 diff -u -r1.44 -r1.45 --- sources 17 Mar 2009 17:00:38 -0000 1.44 +++ sources 18 Mar 2009 23:43:18 -0000 1.45 @@ -1 +1 @@ -a5bdb5fa9bdfce0e06354f64307a23cc fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090317.tar.gz +6f2ecfcd695f3f7ec32ae7bdfe438b33 fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 23:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182355.n2INt3mI001076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 19:54:58 EDT --- Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 Requesting tag now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 00:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190001.n2J01paX002287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 20:01:46 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 00:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190027.n2J0RN0D006362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dakingun at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Deji Akingunola 2009-03-18 20:27:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 01:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190112.n2J1CuWo013634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #7 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-18 21:12:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 > > WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). Cool. So you had broken fonts, updated, and they were not broken anymore? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 02:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190228.n2J2SQQU026600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 --- Comment #8 from Deji Akingunola 2009-03-18 22:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Built fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11 > > > > WORKSFORME (had similar issue reported with 2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64). > > Cool. So you had broken fonts, updated, and they were not broken anymore? Something close to that. I have other fonts (not included in Fedora anymore) installed and my font preferences set in /etc/fonts/local.conf. But on update to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3.fc11.x86_64, the custom settings doesn't have any effects, and my monospaced fonts revert to stock Fedora's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 09:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190957.n2J9vFgr008568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Mathieu Bridon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha at no-log.org --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-03-19 05:57:08 EDT --- Thanks for the report. I contacted upstream about this issue, waiting for their reply. In the meantime, I'll try to patch the font myself. If anyone has a fontforge script ready to do that, do not hesitate to attach it here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 15:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490610] [mr_IN][hi_IN] =?utf-8?q?_Anchoring_in_combination_?= =?utf-8?b?4KSmICsg4KS8IGxvb2tzIG5lZWQgdXBkYXRl?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191508.n2JF8p6U017260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-19 11:08:44 EDT --- Could you please inform where do you find this combination? There will be few more unlikely used combinations of nukta like this and there needs a lot of clean up and testing activity for fixing all such problems. Also it will need an expert designer to spot and fix such things. For now, it does not look a priority issue or even a useful fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 15:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191514.n2JFEj6H018495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-19 11:14:38 EDT --- Nicolas, does this bug means same as #490373? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 15:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191515.n2JFFV6V018973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 15:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191515.n2JFF60q016663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-19 11:15:00 EDT --- Certainly, I am looking forward to do that soonest possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 15:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191515.n2JFFJcR016716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 16:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191605.n2JG5DhD029398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-19 12:05:07 EDT --- No, it means the http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-2.3.8.tar.gz link on https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/ is pointing nowhere -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 18:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191831.n2JIVN7B028888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-19 14:31:17 EDT --- Ok, you're producing the right package names at last But you compat package is still requiring package names that do not match what you build And if you look in /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/ you'll see the files you pack do not match what other packages do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 19:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191908.n2JJ8BZ4009842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-19 15:08:04 EDT --- I fixed the Requires. I see nothing in /u/s/fc/conf.avail, do you mean /etc/fonts/conf.avail? If so, my files resemble those, but are not so complex. They're a straight filling in of a template. If they need enhancement or alteration, I'm not sure where to go next with them, as I have only a vague idea what these files do, and not much idea *how*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 20:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192036.n2JKaVai030309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-19 16:36:24 EDT --- Sorry, I was not clear. -ENOSLEEP Your spec produces dangling symlinks that won't work, such as /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-sans.conf -> /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-sans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 05:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200504.n2K54htY018761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-20 01:04:35 EDT --- This is unusual, as it used to be the correct link. Now all of my entire fedorapeople pages appear to be missing! I have contacted admin for clarification on this. Meanwhile I will shift the sources to some other place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 05:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200510.n2K5ANWa020029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #4 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-03-20 01:10:15 EDT --- The link is up and working now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 05:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490610] [mr_IN][hi_IN] =?utf-8?q?_Anchoring_in_combination_?= =?utf-8?b?4KSmICsg4KS8IGxvb2tzIG5lZWQgdXBkYXRl?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903200526.n2K5Qt8e019597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-03-20 01:26:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could you please inform where do you find this combination? There will be few > more unlikely used combinations of nukta like this and there needs a lot of > clean up and testing activity for fixing all such problems. found this while doing random testing using ibus + iok, while checking it looks very confusing whether i types it for ta or da, that why filed bug > Also it will need an expert designer to spot and fix such things. For now, it does not look a > priority issue or even a useful fix. yeah agree it not in used AFAIK, checked it is not merging when other nukta characters before da+nukta combination just notified, it will be nice checking this for next release update closing bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 13:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903201308.n2KD8oiM016320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-20 09:08:39 EDT --- I feel your pain. :) SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-9.fc10.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 09:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903210951.n2L9pBMv021471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-21 05:50:58 EDT --- And now you have another kind of dangling symlink /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-mono.conf -> /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-mono.conf Would it be so hard to just use the pattern documented in the official spec templates instead of exploring every possible broken alternative? This is getting really old. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 11:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211127.n2LBRrtk006654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-21 07:27:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Enjoyed meeting you all too. Very worth while afternoon. > What about the comments form Nicolas Mailhot? Presumably I need to re-do the > fontconfig file? If you want it to actually do something, yet > Also forgive my ignorance but remind me what/where FAS is again? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Joining_the_Fonts_SIG (I apologize for the long time I spent not checking if this review progressed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 11:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211129.n2LBT00s002450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-21 07:28:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > What is the status of this? The original submitter needs to take care of the review feedback, or someone else needs to submit a competing review request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 11:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211156.n2LBuOUd011970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-21 07:56:11 EDT --- Hi Ankur Some nitpicking: 1. your common_desc declaration is still using define not global 2. I'm not sure doing %clean after %files is a good idea 3. rpmlint complains of beteckna-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1) 4. rpmlint complains of beteckna-fonts-common.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/beteckna-fonts-common-0.3/CHANGELOG (see the gfs font specs for examples of txt file recoding to UTF-8) 5. it seems none of those fonts have normal minuscules. Therefore it'd probably be better to register them as "fantasy" not "sans-serif" in your fontconfig files However the rest of the packaging is sane and much better than some of the stuff I've seen recently and the problems are not worth blocking import ??? APPROVED ??? Please do consider fixing the remaining small problems however You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a As for the warnings emitted by fontforge during build, they unfortunately point problems in the original upstream file. You should relay them to the font author(s) so they get fixed. If you're interested in learning some font creation stuff, you can try to fix them yourself, and create a patch for upstream. eimai and moyogo on #dejavu will usually be helpful to people discovering fontforge. ? REASSIGNING now the review is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 12:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211211.n2LCBGQH014993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-21 08:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I updated the existing wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tuffy_fonts > (is this level of detail ok with you? - I am still new to font packaging) This is good enough (someday we'll figure how to create pretty font previews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 14:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211425.n2LEPfpk007167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-21 10:25:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beteckna-fonts Short Description: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 18:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903211806.n2LI6hvC009188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sanjay_ankur at yahoo.co.in |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 00:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489833] Default Font Rendering is Poor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903220031.n2M0VZp9001971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489833 Jud Craft changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |craftjml at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jud Craft 2009-03-21 20:31:23 EDT --- Ditto on the addendum for #2: GTK actually reads its DPI from Xrdb, like everyone else. It behaves remarkably well. I believe it uses GConf as a way to store DPI changes on the fly. At logon, it loads the GConf value into Xrdb. A useful way to store the user-preference without being Xrdb dependent. Also, Kevin. I'm pretty sure they use the exact same algorithms -- my guess is they have some DPI rounding problems. Example, if you vary Deja Vu Sans, sizes 9 and 10, DPI 94, 96, 98, and hinting between slight and full, you'll notice that Qt and GTK can render nearly identical glyphs -- but at different DPIs. (What's even weirder is that hint-slight on Qt/GTK will mismatch on entirely different DPIs than hint-full. Slight-9-96 will match, but Slight-9-98 won't. Full-10-100 and Full-10-94 will match, but Full-10-98 and Full-10-96 won't.) I was hoping sometime I could build a little visual guide to the discrepancies and post it to the Qt bug thing to see what they think. I'm inclined to think the problem is a rounding bug on their side; GTK allows decimal DPIs (whatever that actually means) while Qt does not, so I'd suspect Qt first. PS, I disagree partially with the "DE need to leave DPI to X". I'm all for consistency, but the X model has inherent flaws of its own -- DPI and subpixel-format should be per-screen, not per-X-server, and X hasn't moved toward that yet. The individual DE's and toolkits would currently be in a better position to use Xrandr and change their rendering based on per-screen settings, than it would be for Xorg to redo their Server attribute paradigms, which would break a whole lot of crap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 03:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490791] cjk texts are broken in flash object of webpage. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903220307.n2M37Fiv029986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490791 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc | |11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from sangu 2009-03-21 23:07:02 EDT --- Fixed in 2.6.99.behdad.20090318-1.fc11. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 05:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903220527.n2M5RYKd019070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #16 from Michael 2009-03-22 01:27:20 EDT --- Fontforge seems to be ok now with the patch: $ rpm -qa | grep imsettings imsettings-libs-0.105.1-4.fc10.i386 imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 05:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903220549.n2M5nYTa019713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-22 01:49:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 22 06:46:47 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/beteckna-fonts/devel beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090322064648.38C0B70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17443/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sun Mar 23 2009 Ankur Sinha - cvs commit --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Beteckna fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Lower Case Beteckna Lower Case fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Small Caps Beteckna Small Caps fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts.spec --- %global fontname beteckna %global common_desc \ This font is available from beteckna.se, it is a geometric sans-serif \ typeface inspired by Paul Renners popular type, Futura. It was drawn by \ Johan Mattsson in Maj 2007. The font is free, licensed under terms of the \ GNU GPL. This version supports English and a few nordic languages. \ Special character ✈ ( ??? ) depicts two cats. %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}-fonts Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.3 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/ Source0: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-lower-case-fontconfig.conf Source3: %{name}-small-caps-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf Beteckna.otf %package common Summary: Common files of %{name} Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. # 1 Lower Case %package -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts Summary: Beteckna lower case sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts %common_desc These are lower case Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf -n lower-case BetecknaLowerCase*.otf # 1 Small Caps %package -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts Summary: Beteckna small caps sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts %common_desc These are small caps Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -n small-caps -f %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf BetecknaSmallCaps.otf %prep %setup -q -n beteckna-0.3 fold -s CHANGELOG > CHANGELOG.new sed -i 's/\r//' CHANGELOG.new touch -r CHANGELOG CHANGELOG.new mv CHANGELOG.new CHANGELOG %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" Beteckna*.sfd << EOF i = 1 while ( i < \$argc ) Open (\$argv[i], 1) otfile = \$fontname + ".otf" Generate(otfile,"otf") Close() i++ endloop EOF %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-small-caps.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-lower-case.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG readme.html %changelog * Tue Mar 17 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-4 - Rebuilt and tested with mock in accordance with #476720 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-3 - Rebuilt using Multi spec --- NEW FILE import.log --- beteckna-fonts-0_3-4_fc10:HEAD:beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm:1237704399 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 06:46:14 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Mar 2009 06:46:15 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c2580a2271ffe186c079b6aa89e57899 beteckna-0.3.tar.gz From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 22 07:07:57 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090322070757.C896F70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23625/F-9 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sun March 22 2009 Ankur Sinha - cvs commit --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Beteckna fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Lower Case Beteckna Lower Case fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Small Caps Beteckna Small Caps fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts.spec --- %global fontname beteckna %global common_desc \ This font is available from beteckna.se, it is a geometric sans-serif \ typeface inspired by Paul Renners popular type, Futura. It was drawn by \ Johan Mattsson in Maj 2007. The font is free, licensed under terms of the \ GNU GPL. This version supports English and a few nordic languages. \ Special character ✈ ( ??? ) depicts two cats. %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}-fonts Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.3 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/ Source0: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-lower-case-fontconfig.conf Source3: %{name}-small-caps-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf Beteckna.otf %package common Summary: Common files of %{name} Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. # 1 Lower Case %package -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts Summary: Beteckna lower case sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts %common_desc These are lower case Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf -n lower-case BetecknaLowerCase*.otf # 1 Small Caps %package -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts Summary: Beteckna small caps sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts %common_desc These are small caps Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -n small-caps -f %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf BetecknaSmallCaps.otf %prep %setup -q -n beteckna-0.3 fold -s CHANGELOG > CHANGELOG.new sed -i 's/\r//' CHANGELOG.new touch -r CHANGELOG CHANGELOG.new mv CHANGELOG.new CHANGELOG %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" Beteckna*.sfd << EOF i = 1 while ( i < \$argc ) Open (\$argv[i], 1) otfile = \$fontname + ".otf" Generate(otfile,"otf") Close() i++ endloop EOF %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-small-caps.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-lower-case.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG readme.html %changelog * Tue Mar 17 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-4 - Rebuilt and tested with mock in accordance with #476720 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-3 - Rebuilt using Multi spec --- NEW FILE import.log --- beteckna-fonts-0_3-4_fc10:F-9:beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm:1237705817 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 07:07:26 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Mar 2009 07:07:27 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c2580a2271ffe186c079b6aa89e57899 beteckna-0.3.tar.gz From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 22 07:18:33 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-10 beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 beteckna-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 Message-ID: <20090322071833.0FDDF70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26563/F-10 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf beteckna-fonts.spec import.log Log Message: * Sun Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha - 1.1 - cvs commit --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Beteckna fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-lower-case-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Lower Case Beteckna Lower Case fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts-small-caps-fontconfig.conf --- fantasy Beteckna Small Caps Beteckna Small Caps fantasy --- NEW FILE beteckna-fonts.spec --- %global fontname beteckna %global common_desc \ This font is available from beteckna.se, it is a geometric sans-serif \ typeface inspired by Paul Renners popular type, Futura. It was drawn by \ Johan Mattsson in Maj 2007. The font is free, licensed under terms of the \ GNU GPL. This version supports English and a few nordic languages. \ Special character ✈ ( ??? ) depicts two cats. %global fontconf 60-%{fontname}-fonts Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.3 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Group: User Interface/X License: GPLv2 URL: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/ Source0: http://gnu.ethz.ch/linuks.mine.nu/beteckna/beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-lower-case-fontconfig.conf Source3: %{name}-small-caps-fontconfig.conf BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel %description %common_desc %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf Beteckna.otf %package common Summary: Common files of %{name} Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %common_desc This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. # 1 Lower Case %package -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts Summary: Beteckna lower case sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts %common_desc These are lower case Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf -n lower-case BetecknaLowerCase*.otf # 1 Small Caps %package -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts Summary: Beteckna small caps sfd fonts Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts %common_desc These are small caps Beteckna Fonts. %_font_pkg -n small-caps -f %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf BetecknaSmallCaps.otf %prep %setup -q -n beteckna-0.3 fold -s CHANGELOG > CHANGELOG.new sed -i 's/\r//' CHANGELOG.new touch -r CHANGELOG CHANGELOG.new mv CHANGELOG.new CHANGELOG %build fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" Beteckna*.sfd << EOF i = 1 while ( i < \$argc ) Open (\$argv[i], 1) otfile = \$fontname + ".otf" Generate(otfile,"otf") Close() i++ endloop EOF %install rm -fr %{buildroot} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p *.otf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-small-caps.conf install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-lower-case.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf %{fontconf}-lower-case.conf %{fontconf}-small-caps.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files common %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG readme.html %changelog * Tue Mar 17 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-4 - Rebuilt and tested with mock in accordance with #476720 * Mon Feb 16 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-3 - Rebuilt using Multi spec --- NEW FILE import.log --- beteckna-fonts-0_3-4_fc10:F-10:beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm:1237706417 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-10/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 22 Mar 2009 07:18:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +beteckna-0.3.tar.gz Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-10/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 22 Mar 2009 05:49:38 -0000 1.1 +++ sources 22 Mar 2009 07:18:02 -0000 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +c2580a2271ffe186c079b6aa89e57899 beteckna-0.3.tar.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 11:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221133.n2MBX1EZ022091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |ivazqueznet at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-22 07:32:46 EDT --- Nice and clean package, I don't see enough of them. Thank you for packaging a new font in Fedora! ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a (Please take the time to replace your defines with globals someday btw) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 12:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221236.n2MCaKf2002437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 12:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221252.n2MCqsjI005666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-22 08:52:40 EDT --- Also, it seems to fail even for plain ttf files, when they have a space in their name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1055798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 22 15:25:32 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 beteckna-fonts.spec,1.1,1.2 Message-ID: <20090322152533.361F970132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27688/F-9 Modified Files: beteckna-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sunday Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha - added group to all subpackages Index: beteckna-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9/beteckna-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- beteckna-fonts.spec 22 Mar 2009 07:07:27 -0000 1.1 +++ beteckna-fonts.spec 22 Mar 2009 15:25:00 -0000 1.2 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.3 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ %package common Summary: Common files of %{name} +Group: User Interface/X Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common @@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ # 1 Lower Case %package -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts Summary: Beteckna lower case sfd fonts +Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-lower-case-fonts @@ -56,6 +58,7 @@ # 1 Small Caps %package -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts Summary: Beteckna small caps sfd fonts +Group: User Interface/X Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontname}-small-caps-fonts @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ %doc AUTHORS LICENSE CHANGELOG readme.html %changelog +* Sun Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha +- 0.3-5 +- spec of F-9 changed to build correctly * Tue Mar 17 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-4 - Rebuilt and tested with mock in accordance with #476720 From ankursinha at fedoraproject.org Sun Mar 22 15:35:34 2009 From: ankursinha at fedoraproject.org (Ankur Sinha) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 beteckna-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090322153534.F056F70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: ankursinha Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30174/F-9 Modified Files: beteckna-fonts.spec Log Message: * Sun Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha - changed fontforge portion of spec Index: beteckna-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/beteckna-fonts/F-9/beteckna-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- beteckna-fonts.spec 22 Mar 2009 15:25:00 -0000 1.2 +++ beteckna-fonts.spec 22 Mar 2009 15:35:03 -0000 1.3 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.3 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Group: User Interface/X @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ %build -fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" Beteckna*.sfd << EOF +fontforge -lang=ff -script "-" *.sfd << EOF i = 1 while ( i < \$argc ) Open (\$argv[i], 1) @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ %changelog * Sun Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha +- 0.3-6 +- changed fontforge portion +* Sun Mar 22 2009 Ankur Sinha - 0.3-5 - spec of F-9 changed to build correctly * Tue Mar 17 2009 Ankur Sinha From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 18:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221822.n2MIMxnC003240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 18:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221824.n2MIOVHr001207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 18:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221850.n2MIoRvS008232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-22 14:50:12 EDT --- Initial review: 1. MUST: rename the package to chisholm-xxx to be consistent with "to be continued" font 2. MUST: register the font as fantasy, really, this is not a general-purpose font at all (also please use the same casing as the font files use, I don't know if fontconfig is case sensitive or not best avoid problems) 3. MUST: there is no clear version in the font files, so use the timestamp of the most recent file as version (19970902) 4. SHOULD: ask upstream to add a detached .txt licensing file to its zip (the font itself says "all rights reserved", and if the web site ever disappears we won't have any licensing grant trace anywhere) 5. SHOULD: ask usptream to use different family names for the three fonts and not invent weird styles like "at their Execution". They'll drive normal software like OpenOffice mad (yes I know this would make it a multifont package which is a bit harder to create but this is the right thing to do) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 04:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230403.n2N43snI002318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-23 00:03:38 EDT --- hi, The wishlist page for the font said :"Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED sans-serif font." That's why i had registered it as sans-serif.. He'll add an OFL to the zip.. As for renaming the styles, he said he couldnt do that.. Do i make this a multi spec with these families ? Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 06:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230628.n2N6SUjX022716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 02:28:14 EDT --- The problem with .ttc and .pfa is that neither is seen as font data by libmagic: [pmatilai at localhost cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1]$ file ukai.ttc ukai.ttc: data [pmatilai at localhost culmus-0.102]$ file YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa: PostScript document text These should be treated filed against "file" (libmagic), rpm will recognize them as fonts as soon as libmagic does. Compressed files aren't currently being looked into. I initially enabled it when enabling the font provide stuff but it blew up at least openoffice.org build due to leaking file descriptors someplace (probably libmagic but haven't had a chance to look at it). Spaces in filenames causing issues is likely to be something entirely different, lets not pile things up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230821.n2N8LEOr009754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-23 04:20:59 EDT --- hi, this is what i got for the licensing, please advise.. "As I stated in my previous email, the license is included in the font headers. You may verify this with the following command: grep -a -B 6 -A 84 'SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE' *.ttf This is the standard way that the OFL is attached to fonts, and it's how my other fonts that have already been packaged for Fedora have been licensed." regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230831.n2N8Vfnr011815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|rpm font autoprovides are |[Tracker] rpm font |missing some font types |autoprovides are missing | |some font types --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-23 04:31:25 EDT --- Ok, let's split this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230835.n2N8ZiXa015886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |491594 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491594] New: libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 Summary: libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, richard at hughsie.com, jnovy at redhat.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,491510 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 491510 libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files This is necessary for font autoprovides to work with ttc files http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #491510 +++ The new font autoprovides are working well for some font formats but are not processing others: 1. ttc files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1026593 2. pfa files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1126190 3. compressed pcf fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1054305 (and probably plain pcf fonts though I could not locate a pcf package that was properly converted yet) --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-22 08:52:40 EDT --- Also, it seems to fail even for plain ttf files, when they have a space in their name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1055798 --- Additional comment from pmatilai at redhat.com on 2009-03-23 02:28:14 EDT --- The problem with .ttc and .pfa is that neither is seen as font data by libmagic: [pmatilai at localhost cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1]$ file ukai.ttc ukai.ttc: data [pmatilai at localhost culmus-0.102]$ file YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa: PostScript document text These should be treated filed against "file" (libmagic), rpm will recognize them as fonts as soon as libmagic does. Compressed files aren't currently being looked into. I initially enabled it when enabling the font provide stuff but it blew up at least openoffice.org build due to leaking file descriptors someplace (probably libmagic but haven't had a chance to look at it). Spaces in filenames causing issues is likely to be something entirely different, lets not pile things up. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-23 04:31:25 EDT --- Ok, let's split this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230838.n2N8cDLv016339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |491595 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230840.n2N8ef9L017245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |491596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491595] New: libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491595 Summary: libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, richard at hughsie.com, jnovy at redhat.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,491510 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 491510 libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files This is necessary for font autoprovides to work with pfa files http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #491510 +++ The new font autoprovides are working well for some font formats but are not processing others: 1. ttc files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1026593 2. pfa files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1126190 3. compressed pcf fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1054305 (and probably plain pcf fonts though I could not locate a pcf package that was properly converted yet) --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-22 08:52:40 EDT --- Also, it seems to fail even for plain ttf files, when they have a space in their name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1055798 --- Additional comment from pmatilai at redhat.com on 2009-03-23 02:28:14 EDT --- The problem with .ttc and .pfa is that neither is seen as font data by libmagic: [pmatilai at localhost cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1]$ file ukai.ttc ukai.ttc: data [pmatilai at localhost culmus-0.102]$ file YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa: PostScript document text These should be treated filed against "file" (libmagic), rpm will recognize them as fonts as soon as libmagic does. Compressed files aren't currently being looked into. I initially enabled it when enabling the font provide stuff but it blew up at least openoffice.org build due to leaking file descriptors someplace (probably libmagic but haven't had a chance to look at it). Spaces in filenames causing issues is likely to be something entirely different, lets not pile things up. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-23 04:31:25 EDT --- Ok, let's split this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] New: libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 Summary: libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file AssignedTo: dnovotny at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, richard at hughsie.com, jnovy at redhat.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, dnovotny at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,491510 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 491510 libmagic does not recognize pcf.gzfiles as font files This is necessary for font autoprovides to work with pcf.gz files http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #491510 +++ The new font autoprovides are working well for some font formats but are not processing others: 1. ttc files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1026593 2. pfa files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1126190 3. compressed pcf fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1054305 (and probably plain pcf fonts though I could not locate a pcf package that was properly converted yet) --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-22 08:52:40 EDT --- Also, it seems to fail even for plain ttf files, when they have a space in their name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1055798 --- Additional comment from pmatilai at redhat.com on 2009-03-23 02:28:14 EDT --- The problem with .ttc and .pfa is that neither is seen as font data by libmagic: [pmatilai at localhost cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1]$ file ukai.ttc ukai.ttc: data [pmatilai at localhost culmus-0.102]$ file YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa: PostScript document text These should be treated filed against "file" (libmagic), rpm will recognize them as fonts as soon as libmagic does. Compressed files aren't currently being looked into. I initially enabled it when enabling the font provide stuff but it blew up at least openoffice.org build due to leaking file descriptors someplace (probably libmagic but haven't had a chance to look at it). Spaces in filenames causing issues is likely to be something entirely different, lets not pile things up. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-23 04:31:25 EDT --- Ok, let's split this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491597] New: font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491597 Summary: font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: rpm AssignedTo: pmatilai at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pmatilai at redhat.com, besfahbo at redhat.com, richard at hughsie.com, jnovy at redhat.com, ffesti at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Blocks: 446451,491510 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 491510 font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #491510 +++ The new font autoprovides are working well for some font formats but are not processing others: 1. ttc files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1026593 2. pfa files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1126190 3. compressed pcf fonts: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1054305 (and probably plain pcf fonts though I could not locate a pcf package that was properly converted yet) --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-22 08:52:40 EDT --- Also, it seems to fail even for plain ttf files, when they have a space in their name: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1055798 --- Additional comment from pmatilai at redhat.com on 2009-03-23 02:28:14 EDT --- The problem with .ttc and .pfa is that neither is seen as font data by libmagic: [pmatilai at localhost cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1]$ file ukai.ttc ukai.ttc: data [pmatilai at localhost culmus-0.102]$ file YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa YehudaCLM-Bold.pfa: PostScript document text These should be treated filed against "file" (libmagic), rpm will recognize them as fonts as soon as libmagic does. Compressed files aren't currently being looked into. I initially enabled it when enabling the font provide stuff but it blew up at least openoffice.org build due to leaking file descriptors someplace (probably libmagic but haven't had a chance to look at it). Spaces in filenames causing issues is likely to be something entirely different, lets not pile things up. --- Additional comment from nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net on 2009-03-23 04:31:25 EDT --- Ok, let's split this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230844.n2N8idEU017899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |491597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Mon Mar 23 08:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-vfs (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 576360] New: OTF is a font format Message-ID: If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576360 gnome-vfs | MIME and file/program mapping | Ver: unspecified Summary: OTF is a font format Product: gnome-vfs Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: MIME and file/program mapping AssignedTo: gnome-vfs-maint at gnome.bugs ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net QAContact: gnome-vfs-maint at gnome.bugs CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified The gnome mime database thinks OTF files are some kind of ODF file (as documented in the ODF spec). However the OTF extension has long been used for OpenType fonts with CFF data, and there are many more OTF font files in the wild and even in linux distributions than OTF ODF files. Therefore the default should be switched to font file. Even OO.o uses the OTF moniker for font files http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576360. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491598] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230853.n2N8rB9R015976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491598 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491594] libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230853.n2N8rgCW016034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 04:53:26 EDT --- to be precise: if I understand correctly, the output of file(1) has to contain the string "font" in order for the automatic system to determine it's a font file, or are there any other requirements? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Mon Mar 23 08:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 576361] New: Support QT-like subpixel rendering Message-ID: If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576361 pango | cairo | Ver: unspecified Summary: Support QT-like subpixel rendering Product: pango Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: cairo AssignedTo: pango-maint at gnome.bugs ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot at LaPoste.net QAContact: pango-maint at gnome.bugs CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified See here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01304.html -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576361. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230913.n2N9DRo8024248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Bug 491510 depends on bug 491597, which changed state. Bug 491597 Summary: font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491597 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491597] font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230913.n2N9DP1v024173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491597 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 05:13:08 EDT --- Heh, didn't notice you already split this up so changelog refers to wrong bug... anyway the whitespace in filenames is now fixed in rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491597] font autoprovides are not working for filenames with spaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230930.n2N9ULVJ025390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491597 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491602] New: Rebuild to pick up font autoprovides Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rebuild to pick up font autoprovides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491602 Summary: Rebuild to pick up font autoprovides Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: tiresias-fonts AssignedTo: tcallawa at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Depends on: 491597 Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Due to rpm bug #491597 font autoprovides were not picked up for all Tiresias fonts Now that rpm has been fixed the package needs to be rebuilt to correct its metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484536] [ml_IN] various smc-fonts have wrong default glyphs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230936.n2N9aFIH029804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484536 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|various smc-fonts have |[ml_IN] various smc-fonts |wrong default glyphs |have wrong default glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] New: [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 Summary: [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, rranjan at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Fonts are not matching to language (Maithili. $fc-match DejaVuSans.ttf: "DejaVu Sans" "Book" While system has: lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch $echo $LANG mai_IN.UTF-8 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Everytime, when any application run in mai_IN locale Steps to Reproduce: 1. login into mai_IN locale (Maithili) 2. click on Computer/Home Folder 3. Actual results: show error to install fonts Expected results: Fonts are already install for Maithili Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 10:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231009.n2NA9uO1004928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 --- Comment #1 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 06:09:39 EDT --- To be exact, the issue here is that libmagic does recognize pcf.gz files correctly *if* MAGIC_COMPRESS flag is used, but the last I tried it in early February caolan said he started getting "cannot create pipe (Too many open files)" errors from magic_file() from within rpm on openoffice.org build. Didn't have a chance to investigate properly at that time so I just flipped it back to not using MAGIC_COMPRESS which "fixed" the issue. Looking it a bit more now, it seems that it's .zip files which cause fd leakage in libmagic (4.x and 5.0), other forms of compression seem to be ok. I should have a reproducer case for you shortly.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 10:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491594] libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231019.n2NAJ19Q003712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 06:18:30 EDT --- Strings matching " font" or " Font" are currently recognized as font by rpm (rpm uses magic_file() btw, not file command). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 11:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231155.n2NBtxAb029322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 07:55:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336274) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336274) Plug fd leak from pipe() Ok, the issue is easily reproducable with just file(1) itself, any .zip file seems to do and run "valgrind --track-fds=yes file -z ". For example: [pmatilai at localhost ~]$ valgrind --track-fds=yes file -z /usr/lib64/openoffice.org/basis3.0/share/config/images.zip ==11616== Memcheck, a memory error detector. ==11616== Copyright (C) 2002-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==11616== Using LibVEX rev 1884, a library for dynamic binary translation. ==11616== Copyright (C) 2004-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP. ==11616== Using valgrind-3.4.1, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework. ==11616== Copyright (C) 2000-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==11616== For more details, rerun with: -v ==11616== /usr/lib64/openoffice.org/basis3.0/share/config/images.zip: PNG image, 16 x 16, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced (Zip archive data, at least v2.0 to extract) ==11616== ==11616== FILE DESCRIPTORS: 4 open at exit. ==11616== Open file descriptor 4: ==11616== at 0x3E20AD8BD7: pipe (in /lib64/libc-2.9.so) ==11616== by 0x4C2F882: file_zmagic (compress.c:383) ==11616== by 0x4C34DA3: file_buffer (funcs.c:206) ==11616== by 0x4C272C6: file_or_fd (magic.c:357) ==11616== by 0x401228: process (file.c:431) ==11616== by 0x401CDB: main (file.c:343) ==11616== The attached one-liner seems to be sufficient to fix, but check by yourself, I'm recovering from a nasty stomach flu and not feeling exactly bright and sharp atm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 12:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491595] libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231254.n2NCs5fS008279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491595 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 08:53:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336283) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336283) added font magic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 12:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491594] libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231254.n2NCse6M008401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 08:54:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336284) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336284) added font magic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 12:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231258.n2NCwj9o009418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 08:58:29 EDT --- hello Panu, thanks for the patch, I checked it and it seems to work; if I add it to the next rawhide build of libmagic, can I close this bug as RAWHIDE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 13:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231348.n2NDmKBF023472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477404, which changed state. Bug 477404 Summary: [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 13:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231348.n2NDmJDk023443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Denis Leroy 2009-03-23 09:48:02 EDT --- I removed the bitstream Vera font that was bundled, and patch K-3D to use the one provided by Fedora instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231412.n2NEC32g028261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477404, which changed state. Bug 477404 Summary: [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231412.n2NEC2Sh028240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-23 10:11:46 EDT --- If your app bundled Vera, please consider http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231419.n2NEJ9Qv030137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 --- Comment #4 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 10:18:52 EDT --- Just toss this back to rpm once libmagic is fixed, I'll still need to enable the compress bit on rpm side of things before this is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231428.n2NESTFx000552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Bug 491510 depends on bug 491595, which changed state. Bug 491595 Summary: libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491595 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231428.n2NESkWe000808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Bug 491510 depends on bug 491594, which changed state. Bug 491594 Summary: libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491594] libmagic does not recognize ttc files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231428.n2NESi71000726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491594 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 10:28:28 EDT --- fixed in file-5.00-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491595] libmagic does not recognize pfa files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231428.n2NESQ4k000467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491595 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 10:28:10 EDT --- fixed in file-5.00-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231431.n2NEVph4002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Denis Leroy 2009-03-23 10:31:35 EDT --- Having worked 3 days on K-3D, I'll punt on this one for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231431.n2NEVqQk002107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477404, which changed state. Bug 477404 Summary: [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 14:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231436.n2NEa0lU004427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|file |rpm AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |pmatilai at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Daniel Novotny 2009-03-23 10:35:43 EDT --- OK, the patch is added in file-5.00-5.fc11, so I'll reassign this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 15:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231534.n2NFYPEv019040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(limb at jcomserv.net | |) | --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-23 11:34:08 EDT --- SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-10.fc10.src.rpm Fixed, and I moved closer to the template. I agree that this is getting old, but I'm learning font packaging as I go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 15:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231544.n2NFiVFn021676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Bug 491510 depends on bug 491596, which changed state. Bug 491596 Summary: libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 15:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491596] libmagic does not recognize pcf.gz files as font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231544.n2NFiTAr021598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491596 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-23 11:44:11 EDT --- Okay, looking into compressed files re-enabled in rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.6.fc11. Thanks Daniel for fixing these so quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Mon Mar 23 19:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gucharmap (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 561907] Show explicit font coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090323191219.76F7023EF5F@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907 gucharmap | general | Ver: 2.24.x Josselin Mouette changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joss at malsain.org ------- Comment #1 from Josselin Mouette 2009-03-23 19:13 UTC ------- See also Christian Ohm?s proposition on http://bugs.debian.org/518811 ?I'd like to have an option to show only characters from the selected font (or somehow mark those substituted from other fonts, like with a darker background), and in the Unicode Block/Script column show the percentage of the block/script covered by this font (with the option to hide those with 0%).? -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561907. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 21:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903232158.n2NLwugS016350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |limb at jcomserv.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-23 17:58:38 EDT --- Ok, this one looks good. Can't test it fully because of bug #491764 but it passes my other tests ??? APPROVED ??? Please make sure the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes are taken care of. Also I think you deserve at least co-maintainership of the new package. Congratulations This is about the worst-case font packaging scenario you can get in Fedora so if you don't forget what you've learnt here you should be able to package about any font now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 22:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903232204.n2NM48Ce015327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #19 from Orion Poplawski 2009-03-23 18:03:52 EDT --- Oh, I'd love to give this package up to whoever wants it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 22:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903232230.n2NMUrVV023052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-23 18:30:35 EDT --- Panu, For some reason this still does not work for culmus-fonts pfa files, even though file now correctly identifies them $ file /usr/share/fonts/culmus/MiriamMonoCLM-BookOblique.pfa /usr/share/fonts/culmus/MiriamMonoCLM-BookOblique.pfa: PostScript Type 1 font text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Mon Mar 23 22:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (pango (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 576361] Support QT-like subpixel rendering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090323224059.0A0C123F502@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576361 pango | cairo | Ver: unspecified Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |behdad at gnome.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTGNOME ------- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-23 22:41 UTC ------- Would have helped if the person suggesting this actually read that Qt page. Quoting from the page: "Note that the filtering we use in Qt 4.4 and earlier is pretty much the same as Freetype?s default filtering, but unlike before we now also support the other filtering settings." Nothing new here. So this is about supporting all four different filters, instead of one we support now. That issue is tracked in the following cairo bug: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10301 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576361. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 00:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240033.n2O0XXd7011133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Jeff Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |n3npq at mac.com --- Comment #5 from Jeff Johnson 2009-03-23 20:33:14 EDT --- rpm used to have a private copy of /usr/share/magic, so it may not be enough to fix file*(1). Same patch to rpm's version of /usr/share/magic is all that is needed. Space in file paths is just ho-hum tedium yes ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 04:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240411.n2O4B8E7015865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-24 00:10:51 EDT --- Might be the same as bug 490888 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 04:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491598] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240420.n2O4KbOv017309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491598 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com Component|gnome-mime-data |shared-mime-info AssignedTo|rstrode at redhat.com |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-24 00:20:19 EDT --- I guess it depends on your perspective if you consider OpenDocument Formula Templates more or less important than otf fonts. Anyway, the right component for this is shared-mime-info, and you should also report it upstream in bugs.freedesktop.org. One thing we could do is add the *.otf glob to application/x-font-otf as well, and use the new glob weights to control which one wins by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 05:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240518.n2O5I21E026492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-03-24 01:17:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts Short Description: A stylized font Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 07:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240706.n2O765gx016185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 --- Comment #6 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-24 03:05:46 EDT --- Oh I see, " text" happens to be before " [Ff]ont" in the matching order so "foo font text" gets classified as text. PFA isn't the only font type affected by this either. Will fix... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 07:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903240757.n2O7vwFk019672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 --- Comment #7 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-24 03:57:40 EDT --- ...and fixed in rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.7.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 10:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490583] Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241037.n2OAbvAC019270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490583 --- Comment #1 from Minto Joseph 2009-03-24 06:37:38 EDT --- Could you download the following rpm and check? http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-4.fc10.noarch.rpm # rpm -ql sil-padauk-fonts /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-sil-padauk.conf /usr/share/doc/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4 /usr/share/doc/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4/FONTLOG.txt /usr/share/doc/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4/OFL-FAQ.txt /usr/share/doc/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4/OFL.txt /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/65-sil-padauk.conf /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/Padauk-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/Padauk.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 10:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241042.n2OAgvrb020341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Minto Joseph 2009-03-24 06:42:38 EDT --- Hello, I hope I have cleaned up the package pretty much. Please have a look.. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts-2.4-4.fc11.src.rpm http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/sil-padauk-fonts.spec Regards, Mintos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org Tue Mar 24 10:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.gnome.org (gnome-vfs (bugzilla.gnome.org)) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Bug 576360] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090324104501.385B723F4FC@label.gnome.org> If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576360 gnome-vfs | MIME and file/program mapping | Ver: unspecified Alexander Larsson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at redhat.com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |NOTGNOME ------- Comment #1 from Alexander Larsson 2009-03-24 10:45 UTC ------- gnome uses the freedesktop shared mime database these days. If this is not fixed in that database, please file a bug at: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=shared-mime-info -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576360. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 11:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241102.n2OB2PtF024608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-24 07:02:05 EDT --- beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 12:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241228.n2OCSIkX010348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 08:27:59 EDT --- Awesome, thanks for you review and font education. Orion, I'll take over the new package. You want co-maintainership? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnu-free-fonts Short Description: Free UCS Outline Fonts Owners: limb Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 13:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241331.n2ODVOIj031058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski 2009-03-24 09:31:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Awesome, thanks for you review and font education. Orion, I'll take over the > new package. You want co-maintainership? Works for me. New Package CVS Request ====================== Package Name: gnu-free-fonts Short Description: Free UCS Outline Fonts Owners: limb orion Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 13:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241335.n2ODZgp7027738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sshedmak at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-03-24 09:35:23 EDT --- >From Comment #2 1) Upstream has published each font in a separate versioned archive, with no .exe inside, and with the font exception added to its licensing. 2) The revised SPEC and RPMS is available at http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pothana2000-fonts.spec & http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pothana2000-fonts-1.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 3) Please suggest the correct fontconfig priority level [I have kept it 69]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 17:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478570] Review Request: oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241720.n2OHKeLv023087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478570 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-24 13:20:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 17:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241734.n2OHYfss030251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-24 13:34:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241822.n2OIMt0B005871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 14:22:35 EDT --- gnu-free-fonts has replaced freefont in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From limb at fedoraproject.org Tue Mar 24 18:24:32 2009 From: limb at fedoraproject.org (Jon Ciesla) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freefont/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1 freefont.spec,1.4,NONE Message-ID: <20090324182432.6787B70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: limb Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freefont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23431 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: freefont.spec Log Message: Replaced by gnu-free-fonts. --- NEW FILE dead.package --- Renamed to gnu-free-fonts, BZ486977. -Jon Ciesla, limb at jcomserv.net, 3/24/2009 --- freefont.spec DELETED --- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241823.n2OIN3vI015865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 14:22:43 EDT --- gnu-free-fonts has replaced freefont in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITPoF017238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 Bug 480457 depends on bug 477336, which changed state. Bug 477336 Summary: [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITOOU017221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Bug 477473 depends on bug 477336, which changed state. Bug 477336 Summary: [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITLuX017168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477336, which changed state. Bug 477336 Summary: [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITMe0017199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 Bug 477471 depends on bug 477336, which changed state. Bug 477336 Summary: [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITQKn017258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Bug 480473 depends on bug 477336, which changed state. Bug 477336 Summary: [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241829.n2OITKY9017139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 14:28:59 EDT --- gnu-free-fonts has replaced freefont in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241831.n2OIVDID008053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Bug 477336 depends on bug 486977, which changed state. Bug 486977 Summary: Review Request: gnu-free-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479238] please update to latest release (freefont-ttf-20090104) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241831.n2OIVEDG008079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479238 Bug 479238 depends on bug 486977, which changed state. Bug 486977 Summary: Review Request: gnu-free-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241831.n2OIVCOO008015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 14:30:52 EDT --- Imported and built. Bugs for known dependant packages updated. freefont EOL ticket updated. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477336] [freefont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241848.n2OIm8VU011845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 14:47:48 EDT --- Reminder to Nicolas and Orion to update cinepaint, plplot and ftgl-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241908.n2OJ8tOe028075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480473, which changed state. Bug 480473 Summary: [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241908.n2OJ8svI028049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-24 15:08:33 EDT --- Fixed and built in rawhide for new gnu-free-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491961] New: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491961 Summary: [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-KOI8-R AssignedTo: than at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: than at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491956] New: [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491956 Summary: [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491962] New: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Summary: [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghostscript-fonts AssignedTo: twaugh at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: twaugh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491968] New: [mathml-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mathml-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491968 Summary: [mathml-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: mathml-fonts AssignedTo: rdieter at math.unl.edu ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rdieter at math.unl.edu, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491959] New: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491959 Summary: [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-hebrew-fancy AssignedTo: danken at cs.technion.ac.il ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: danken at cs.technion.ac.il, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491965] New: [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491965 Summary: [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: jisksp16-1990-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491966] New: [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491966 Summary: [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: knm_new-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491972] New: [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491972 Summary: [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: taipeifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491958] New: [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491958 Summary: [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: efont-unicode-bdf AssignedTo: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491954] New: [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491954 Summary: [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: baekmuk-bdf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] New: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Summary: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fonts-ISO8859-2 AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJn7To028475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491954 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnXZG029281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491968 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnNj8028983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491963 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnaDG029376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnFB8028723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnR0u029078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnABg028566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJns5s029875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJndB9029468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491961] [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnIfm028816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491961 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:58 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491956] [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJn8Ex028505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491956 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:49 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491968] [mathml-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnWSb029224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491968 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:13 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491972] [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJngYn029556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491972 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:22 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491966] [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnUsR029168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491966 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:10 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnqXF029815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:33 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491962] [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnKRw028869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:01 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491954] [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJn5DB028402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491954 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:45 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491965] [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnSM0029112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491965 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:08 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491959] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnGFN028752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491959 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:56 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491958] [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnDDL028663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491958 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:54 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491975] [zvbi] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnoaa029757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491975 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:30 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491971] [rosegarden4] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnepZ029500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491971 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:20 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491964] [jfbterm] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnP7r029014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491964 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:05 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491969] [monafont] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnYNS029310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491969 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:15 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491970] [nted] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnbjh029406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491970 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:18 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491974] [wqy-zenhei-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnkQR029673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491974 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:27 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491973] [terminus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJniII029612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491973 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:25 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491957] [culmus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnBuD028603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491957 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:48:51 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 19:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491963] [japanese-bitmap-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241949.n2OJnMC7028922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491963 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |446451(F11Target) Depends on| |491510 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 15:49:03 EDT --- Due to various problems in libmagic and rpm, the new Fedora 11 font autoprovides were not working for some less common font formats (as detailed in bug #491510). We have detected your package is affected: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pcf.gz" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*pfa" -f "/usr/share/fonts/*ttc" --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' Please rebuild your package in rawhide to have the fixed rpmbuild add the correct autoprovides to its metadata. If you package still has not been converted to the new font packaging guidelines (bug #477044), please do the conversion first as autoprovides won't do a lot of good for packages that do not respect that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491971] [rosegarden4] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242026.n2OKQC6m015858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491971 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-03-24 16:25:52 EDT --- Hi, I have converted rosegarden4 to the new font guidelines. But it still needs reviewed. Could you have a look before I rebuild it? Ref: Bug 477450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242031.n2OKV3n6016813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913 Dan Kenigsberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(danken at cs.technio | |n.ac.il) | --- Comment #3 from Dan Kenigsberg 2009-03-24 16:30:42 EDT --- thanks for the review. due to the not-so-little more work required, my other obligations, and the marginal importance of this package, I am afraid that I won't be able to fix it, certainly not on time for F11. I guess not many people depend on the package, so Fedora will survive without it for a while. (of course if someone else around the 'net agrees to take ownership, be my guest) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491986] New: a font cause gtk applications to crash on x86_64 systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: a font cause gtk applications to crash on x86_64 systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491986 Summary: a font cause gtk applications to crash on x86_64 systems Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo at redhat.com ReportedBy: alsadi at ojuba.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: having this file installed http://www.ojuba.org/sharedfiles/SimplifiedNaskh.ttf and used to render Arabic text will crash gtk applications Actual results: crash Expected results: no crash Additional info: if the font is corrupted it should not crash and why it only crash in x86_64 systems details in upstream bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242035.n2OKZSpQ008274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 16:35:09 EDT --- (aslo if you have the time please package Vemana2000 too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242034.n2OKYx0g007902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sshedmak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 16:34:39 EDT --- Ok, more review: 1. Your URL metadata field should point to upstream's web site, not directly to the zip (probably http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm) 2. It would be better if upstream's added the exact text of the font exception to its licensing file, as the FSF may release another wording someday and then we won't know which one was intended. Though it's already good enough for packaging IMHO. 3. It would be better if upstream used "Regular" or "Normal" as style, most apps won't know what to do with a "Pothana2000" style (I suspect it's the "preferred OTF style" metadata in fontforge ; also opening the font in fontforge results in many warnings) 4. You can drop the "%dir %{_fontdir}" line 5. rpmlint warns of pothana2000-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 40) 6. 69 should be safe for now. You need to discuss with the packagers of other Telugu fonts in Fedora to decide in common what the best priority should be for this font Anyway nothing blocking here, so I'll approve the package as-is but do try to fix those little problems ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 21:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242118.n2OLIfwY027304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 17:18:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > You may verify this with the following command: > > grep -a -B 6 -A 84 'SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE' *.ttf Check this and you'll see this is missing in the ttf in your package. Maybe you didn't package the same version upstream uses (and anyway a detached txt file is much better) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 21:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242120.n2OLKoQO028094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-24 17:20:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > hi, > > The wishlist page for the font said :"Letters Laughing is a decorative/LED > sans-serif font." That's why i had registered it as sans-serif.. The wishlist pages are not problem-free, they're only as good as the original reported made them, so as packager you need to exercise caution and check the info provided here is correct when packaging. > He'll add an OFL to the zip.. As for renaming the styles, he said he couldnt do > that.. Do i make this a multi spec with these families ? If upstream does not want to change the styles we certainly should not do it in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 22:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473836] Fonts in GNOME look blurry (was: "in Firefox") In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242259.n2OMxfS1004990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com, | |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Component|freefont |freetype Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|orion at cora.nwra.com |besfahbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 23:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491973] [terminus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242308.n2ON8ihv015981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491973 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-03-24 19:08:23 EDT --- Is just rebuilding ("make build") the package sufficient or do I need to contact rel-eng concerning re-tagging? The rebuild was successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1257402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 23:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491970] [nted] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242309.n2ON9nh2006814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491970 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-03-24 19:09:29 EDT --- Is just rebuilding ("make build") the package sufficient or do I need to contact rel-eng concerning re-tagging? The rebuild is still running: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1257427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 23:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491970] [nted] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242317.n2ONH8tf008235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491970 --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-03-24 19:16:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The rebuild is still running: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1257427 Has just finished successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 23:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491973] [terminus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242317.n2ONHVh6017582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491973 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 04:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477411] [libeXosip2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250441.n2P4fMgC008222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411 --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2009-03-25 00:41:01 EDT --- /usr/share/doc/libeXosip2-devel-3.1.0/latex/FreeSans.ttf is the problem here. Incidentally the freefont package provides /usr/share/fonts/freefont/FreeSans.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490583] Package includes the wrong fonts, so rendering of most Myanmar words is wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250546.n2P5k6L1008114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490583 --- Comment #2 from Keith Stribley 2009-03-25 01:45:45 EDT --- Yes the new package works. However, I found I needed to manually remove padauk-fonts rather than sil-padauk-fonts being regarded as an upgrade. thanks, Keith -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491510] [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nlki008562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-25 01:49:26 EDT --- AFAICS we're all done here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491975] [zvbi] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250550.n2P5o3I0009298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491975 Bug 491975 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491971] [rosegarden4] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nxMQ008911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491971 Bug 491971 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491970] [nted] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nxAK008890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491970 Bug 491970 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491972] [taipeifonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250550.n2P5o0Y7008933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491972 Bug 491972 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491961] [fonts-KOI8-R] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nr1U008743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491961 Bug 491961 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491966] [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nuTP008836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491966 Bug 491966 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491956] [cjkuni-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5noHQ008661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491956 Bug 491956 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491957] [culmus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5npi8008686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491957 Bug 491957 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491969] [monafont] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nwKh008870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491969 Bug 491969 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491964] [jfbterm] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5ntrR008792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491964 Bug 491964 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491974] [wqy-zenhei-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250550.n2P5o2je009260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491974 Bug 491974 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491962] [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nrBK008759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Bug 491962 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491968] [mathml-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nv5V008857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491968 Bug 491968 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491965] [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nu2e008814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491965 Bug 491965 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491976] [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250550.n2P5o33d009320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976 Bug 491976 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491954] [baekmuk-bdf-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nna5008637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491954 Bug 491954 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491963] [japanese-bitmap-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nsXf008775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491963 Bug 491963 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491973] [terminus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250550.n2P5o11W009026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491973 Bug 491973 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491959] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5nq28008723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491959 Bug 491959 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 05:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491958] [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250549.n2P5npnu008707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491958 Bug 491958 depends on bug 491510, which changed state. Bug 491510 Summary: [Tracker] rpm font autoprovides are missing some font types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491510 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 08:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250800.n2P80C8n031121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-25 03:59:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > You may verify this with the following command: > > > > grep -a -B 6 -A 84 'SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE' *.ttf > > > Check this and you'll see this is missing in the ttf in your package. Maybe you > didn't package the same version upstream uses (and anyway a detached txt file > is much better) hi, I had used the link on the wishlist page for the package.. He directed me to another link which has "updated packages", I'll upload the packages with this new source today. (In reply to comment #5) okay, so i use the simple spec to or a multi spec with his styles? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 08:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250819.n2P8JO6x003228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-25 04:19:03 EDT --- If the font files do not declare different family names, only different styles, you should use the simple spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org Wed Mar 25 08:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org (bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:52:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Bug 20854] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090325085222.A6BDF13005A@annarchy.freedesktop.org> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-25 01:52:20 PST --- (for example I count ~ 30 packages including one or many OTF font files in Fedora, and none including ODF OTF files) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 10:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251002.n2PA2tmO004155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 --- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake 2009-03-25 06:02:32 EDT --- >From Comment #4 Fixed the download URL, dropped the "%dir %{_fontdir}" line & fixed the rpmlint W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs. New SPEC and SRPMS available at: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/pothana2000-fonts.spec & http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/pothana2000-fonts-1.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm respectively. Since, this is my first package, I don't have "Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group" access. Can you sponsor me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 10:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251030.n2PAU1bU010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-25 06:29:39 EDT --- Ah, I didn't see you needed sponsoring. Since font packages are rather simple we ask new packagers to submit 2-3 packages that pass review before they get sponsored. So you need to find two other fonts you like and package them too, to show you understand packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 10:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251041.n2PAfBFa001211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-03-25 06:40:49 EDT --- hi, submissions: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/letterslaughing_fonts/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/letterslaughing_fonts/chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts.spec Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 11:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491973] [terminus-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251141.n2PBfk6d014519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491973 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-25 07:41:24 EDT --- Rebuild is a good first step. As for retagging, I guess we need to ask rel-eng if it's ready to re-tag all the packages affected. Can you do it? I don't really have the time right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 13:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491598] OTF is a font format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251310.n2PDAgeR015537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491598 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-03-25 09:10:19 EDT --- The bug is already upstream at: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251438.n2PEc43W028001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 Jon Dufresne changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jon.dufresne at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From spot at fedoraproject.org Wed Mar 25 14:46:32 2009 From: spot at fedoraproject.org (Tom Callaway) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090325144632.CB9D970132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6626 Modified Files: tiresias-fonts.spec Log Message: rebuild for font autoprovides Index: tiresias-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- tiresias-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 20:54:51 -0000 1.4 +++ tiresias-fonts.spec 25 Mar 2009 14:46:02 -0000 1.5 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Summary: Low vision fonts Version: 1.0 -Release: 5%{?dist} +Release: 6%{?dist} License: GPLv3+ Group: User Interface/X Source0: http://www.tiresias.org/fonts/infofont.zip @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ %dir %{_fontdir} %changelog +* Wed Mar 25 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway - 1.0-6 +- rebuild for font autoprovides + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 15:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491602] Rebuild to pick up font autoprovides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251534.n2PFYMvB007984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491602 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-03-25 11:34:00 EDT --- Rebuilt in rawhide: tiresias-fonts-1.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251607.n2PG7vRi017642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-25 12:07:34 EDT --- beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update beteckna-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491975] [zvbi] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251622.n2PGMLiN022515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491975 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 17:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473903] font size isn't restored upon login In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251757.n2PHvC03013184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473903 --- Comment #1 from Bryan Mason 2009-03-25 13:56:50 EDT --- I'm seeing this behavior as well with a dual-display IBM T41. The internal LCD is 1024x768 and the external is 1280x1024, so the total desktop size is 2304x1024. I'm using 8-pt Liberation fonts for my system fonts. The font is wrong about half the time when I log in, and re-running gnome-appearance-properties resolves the issue. One other behavior I noticed is that when the font is wrong, Ctl-Alt-L fails to lock the display. Let me know if I there's any debugging and/or logging I can do to help figure this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 18:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251847.n2PIlwVu003702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-25 14:47:35 EDT --- This spec is mostly ok (you still have a stray define that needs to be changed to global) The only bit which is really missing is the obsolete to provide users an upgrade path http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#.28n:1.29_Many-to-one_replacement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 02:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260207.n2Q27wBw025888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-25 22:07:35 EDT --- Great. Thank you for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 02:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260225.n2Q2PHKu023440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-25 22:24:54 EDT --- Yeah, should be the same bug. Can you uninstall the font package in question and install again, and see if problem persists? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 03:09:36 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.70,1.71 Message-ID: <20090326030936.629E670132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31872 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: * Wed Mar 25 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-2 - Add Provides: freetype-bytecode and freetype-subpixel if built with those options. - Resolves: #155210 Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.70 retrieving revision 1.71 diff -u -r1.70 -r1.71 --- freetype.spec 13 Mar 2009 22:15:14 -0000 1.70 +++ freetype.spec 26 Mar 2009 03:09:05 -0000 1.71 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ BuildRequires: libX11-devel +%if %{?_with_bytecode_interpreter:1}%{!?_with_bytecode_interpreter:0} +Provides: %{name}-bytecode +%endif +%if %{?_with_subpixel_rendering:1}%{!?_with_subpixel_rendering:0} +Provides: %{name}-subpixel +%endif + %description The FreeType engine is a free and portable font rendering engine, developed to provide advanced font support for a variety of @@ -221,6 +228,11 @@ %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Wed Mar 25 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-2 +- Add Provides: freetype-bytecode and freetype-subpixel if built + with those options. +- Resolves: #155210 + * Thu Mar 13 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-1 - Update to 2.3.9. - Resolves #489928 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 03:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485050] Unicode 5.1 support in pango - Indic Lanuages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260337.n2Q3boLA012457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485050 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-25 23:37:26 EDT --- Committing upstream. Lets close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 03:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485569] x86 fontcache can't be rebuilt on x86_64 systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260340.n2Q3eXGH005128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485569 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-25 23:40:10 EDT --- I plan to do that. Not sure if for f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 04:04:11 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.157,1.158 Message-ID: <20090326040411.2C0D570133@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12599 Modified Files: pango.spec Log Message: * Wed Mar 26 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-2 - Remove weird Requires(pre). - Resolves #486641 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.157 retrieving revision 1.158 diff -u -r1.157 -r1.158 --- pango.spec 16 Mar 2009 23:17:14 -0000 1.157 +++ pango.spec 26 Mar 2009 04:03:40 -0000 1.158 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango Version: 1.24.0 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ # We need to prereq this so we can run pango-querymodules Prereq: glib2 >= %{glib2_version} Prereq: freetype >= %{freetype_version} -Requires(pre): libXrender, libX11, libXext, libXft Requires: freetype >= %{freetype_version} Requires: cairo >= %{cairo_version} Requires: libthai >= %{libthai_version} @@ -225,6 +224,10 @@ %changelog +* Wed Mar 26 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-2 +- Remove weird Requires(pre). +- Resolves #486641 + * Mon Mar 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-1 - Update to 1.24.0 - Package pango-view.1.gz From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 04:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486641] library dependency issues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260409.n2Q49mjI017880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486641 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-03-26 00:09:24 EDT --- * Wed Mar 26 2009 Behdad Esfahbod - 1.24.0-2 - Remove weird Requires(pre). - Resolves #486641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 04:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490888] All fonts are monospace after upgrade to fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260428.n2Q4S6ek013357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490888 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 04:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260433.n2Q4Xo9m014158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 07:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491604] [mai_IN] application showing error "* wants to Install a font" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260746.n2Q7kG1P012255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491604 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from A S Alam 2009-03-26 03:45:43 EDT --- ok, after install again, it is working (no problem exist) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 09:16:24 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,1.2,1.3 Message-ID: <20090326091624.B05C170132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30169 Modified Files: jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.983-4 - Update a spec file a bit. - rebuild to correct autoprovides. (#491965) Index: jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 09:26:02 -0000 1.2 +++ jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:15:54 -0000 1.3 @@ -1,19 +1,20 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} +%define fontname jisksp16-1990 +%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -Name: jisksp16-1990-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 0.983 -Release: 3%{?dist} -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: gzip mkfontdir xorg-x11-font-utils +Release: 4%{?dist} +Summary: 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font +Group: User Interface/X +License: Public Domain URL: http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/ftp/fonts/ Source0: http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/ftp/fonts/jisksp16-1990.bdf.Z +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildArch: noarch -Summary: 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font -License: Public Domain -Group: User Interface/X +BuildRequires: gzip mkfontdir xorg-x11-font-utils Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Provides: jisksp16-1990 = 0.1-16 Obsoletes: jisksp16-1990 <= 0.1-16 @@ -34,8 +35,8 @@ %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} +install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} install -m 0644 -p jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/ @@ -49,13 +50,17 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-, root, root, -) +%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) %dir %{fontdir} %{fontdir}/jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog +* Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.983-4 +- Update a spec file a bit. +- rebuild to correct autoprovides. (#491965) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.983-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 09:29:35 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090326092935.D9A2D70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1138 Modified Files: jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/jisksp16-1990-fonts/devel/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:15:54 -0000 1.3 +++ jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:29:05 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ %define fontname jisksp16-1990 -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname} %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d Name: %{fontname}-fonts @@ -8,13 +7,15 @@ Summary: 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font Group: User Interface/X License: Public Domain + URL: http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/ftp/fonts/ Source0: http://kanji.zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~yasuoka/ftp/fonts/jisksp16-1990.bdf.Z BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: gzip mkfontdir xorg-x11-font-utils fontpackages-devel -BuildRequires: gzip mkfontdir xorg-x11-font-utils +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Provides: jisksp16-1990 = 0.1-16 Obsoletes: jisksp16-1990 <= 0.1-16 @@ -35,25 +36,23 @@ %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} -install -m 0644 -p jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/ +install -m 0644 -p jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink -ln -sf %{fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name} +ln -sf %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -%files -%defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%_font_pkg jisksp16-1990.pcf.gz + +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 09:38:06 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel knm_new-fonts.spec,1.3,1.4 Message-ID: <20090326093806.0A49970132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4331 Modified Files: knm_new-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 - Clean up a spec file. - Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) Index: knm_new-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel/knm_new-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- knm_new-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 11:40:21 -0000 1.3 +++ knm_new-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:37:35 -0000 1.4 @@ -1,21 +1,23 @@ -%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} +%define fontname knm_new %define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d -Name: knm_new-fonts +Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 Release: 4%{?dist} -BuildArch: noarch -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: mkfontdir + +Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font +Group: User Interface/X +License: GPL+ + ## the following upstream URL is a dead link anymore. #URL: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/ #Source0: http://www.din.or.jp/~storm/fonts/knm_new.tar.gz Source0: knm_new.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: mkfontdir fontpackages-devel - -Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font -License: GPL+ -Group: User Interface/X +Requires: fontpackages-filesystem Conflicts: fonts-japanese <= 0.20061016-11.fc8 Provides: knm_new = 1.1-16 Obsoletes: knm_new <= 1.1-16 @@ -34,32 +36,32 @@ %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} +install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} +install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue} -install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/ +install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir}/ -%{_bindir}/mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir} +%{_bindir}/mkfontdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_fontdir} # Install catalogue symlink -%{__ln_s} -f %{fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{name} +%{__ln_s} -f %{_fontdir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/%{fontname} %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -%files -%defattr(-, root, root, -) +%_font_pkg *.pcf.gz %lang(ja) %doc fonts/readme fonts/changes %doc fonts/gtkrc.sample -%dir %{fontdir} -%{fontdir}/*.pcf.gz -%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}/fonts.dir +%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_fontdir}/fonts.dir %{catalogue}/* %changelog +* Thu Mar 26 2009 Akira TAGOH - 1.1-5 +- Clean up a spec file. +- Rebuild to correct autoprovides (#491966) + * Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 09:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491965] [jisksp16-1990-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260935.n2Q9Z0tJ001783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491965 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-26 05:34:36 EDT --- Rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From tagoh at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 09:39:30 2009 From: tagoh at fedoraproject.org (Akira TAGOH) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel knm_new-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090326093930.3446A70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: tagoh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4774 Modified Files: knm_new-fonts.spec Log Message: Index: knm_new-fonts.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/knm_new-fonts/devel/knm_new-fonts.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- knm_new-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:37:35 -0000 1.4 +++ knm_new-fonts.spec 26 Mar 2009 09:39:00 -0000 1.5 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Name: %{fontname}-fonts Version: 1.1 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font Group: User Interface/X From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 09:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491966] [knm_new-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903260942.n2Q9gWLE012357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491966 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-26 05:42:07 EDT --- Rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From mtasaka at fedoraproject.org Thu Mar 26 17:24:51 2009 From: mtasaka at fedoraproject.org (Mamoru Tasaka) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel efont-unicode-bdf.spec,1.4,1.5 Message-ID: <20090326172451.CBC6F70132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: mtasaka Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5760 Modified Files: efont-unicode-bdf.spec Log Message: * Fri Mar 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.2-9 - F-11: Again rebuild for new virtual font Provides (#491958) Index: efont-unicode-bdf.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/efont-unicode-bdf/devel/efont-unicode-bdf.spec,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- efont-unicode-bdf.spec 23 Feb 2009 22:10:59 -0000 1.4 +++ efont-unicode-bdf.spec 26 Mar 2009 17:24:21 -0000 1.5 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Name: %{name} Version: 0.4.2 -Release: 8%{?dist} +Release: 9%{?dist} Summary: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory Group: User Interface/X @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ %{catalogdir}/fonts-%{name} %changelog +* Fri Mar 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.2-9 +- F-11: Again rebuild for new virtual font Provides (#491958) + * Tue Feb 24 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.4.2-8 - F-11: Mass rebuild From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 17:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491958] [efont-unicode-bdf] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261742.n2QHg9HF020717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491958 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 13:41:44 EDT --- This one is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 17:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491969] [monafont] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261754.n2QHsuDe023979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491969 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 13:54:30 EDT --- This one is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 17:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261759.n2QHxY2P025325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477488, which changed state. Bug 477488 Summary: [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 17:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261759.n2QHxXZr025304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 13:59:07 EDT --- Closing. I will use gnu-free-mono-fonts for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 18:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261801.n2QI15XI019507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 14:00:38 EDT --- Changing to MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 18:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491964] [jfbterm] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261802.n2QI2hkB020047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491964 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-26 14:02:18 EDT --- Done, with explicitly adding "%global __fontconfig_provides %{nil}". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 05:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] New: Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Summary: Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: wqy-bitmap-fonts AssignedTo: fangqq at gmail.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fangqq at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Failure Case 1: gramps PDF generation ===================================== gramps is a genealogy application that generates PDF charts. It seems to ask pango to choose fonts for it based upon given glyphs. * In Fedora 10, it successfully output charts using entirely truetype fonts. * In Fedora 11 however, the UTF-8 Chinese characters are rendered in PDF as bitmap fonts, which do not scale properly and are ugly compared to the truetype equivalents. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576890 Behdad proposes this bug upstream, which would workaround this type of issue at least for vector rendering cases like PDF generation. I am uncertain if this is correct though, and it creates possibly inconsistent behavior? Failure Case 2: pango-view ========================== Here is a similar way to reproduce this bug: LANG=en_US.utf8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "100" LANG=zh_CN.utf8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "100" English pango renders the Chinese characters as ugly bitmap. Chinese pango renders the Chinese characters as truetype. Workaround: uninstall wqy-bitmap-fonts ====================================== Both of the above problems go away if you uninstall wqy-bitmap-fonts. But this should not be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 06:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270658.n2R6wuwb011799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-27 02:58:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336970) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336970) new fontconfig conf for wqy-bitmap-fonts I think I managed to get this fixed with this proposed fontconfig config for wqy-bitmap-fonts. we may need to do more review for this new fontconfig. I'll post this to fedora-fonts-list later. anyway, you can test it if you like. Please let me know if I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 07:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270709.n2R79GjS010685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-27 03:08:50 EDT --- erm, totally broken config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 08:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270833.n2R8XhYc029504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-27 04:33:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336973) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336973) new fontconfig conf for wqy-bitmap-fonts (2nd try) Note that "priority list" rules in 65-nonlatin.conf also breaks this order of the font. you need to remove an entity from there first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 08:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270841.n2R8fs8O031146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #336970|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 09:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903270902.n2R92qiT032622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-27 05:02:25 EDT --- Some feedback (but I'm *not* a CJK user so my opinion does not count much) : 1. our current practice is to forbid CJK fontconfig rules bellow 65. The current package violates this by putting stuff at 61 2. IMHO the fontconfig rules in a package should never declare rules for fonts not included in this package. So I'd dump all the rules not dealing with "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song". If someone wants "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" rules he can ask to have them added to the Fedora package that ships "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" (if any) 3. IMHO it's also bad practice to declare a font in several generic families choose serif, sans-serif or monospace but not all of them 4. what's the point of zh monospace 16 ??? So to sum up, you've simplified a bit but it needs to be simplified a lot more, this file tries to be too clever by half and only succeeds in confusing apps and users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 10:12:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271012.n2RACIrN018797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-27 06:11:50 EDT --- Well, I'm not a good person to answer all of questions but just tried to keep alive as much as possible and get rid of issue only there. and this fontconfig rule should be argued on bugzilla and the maling list before as far as I can read a bugzilla in changelog but anyway. so with thinking of that: (In reply to comment #4) > 2. IMHO the fontconfig rules in a package should never declare rules for fonts > not included in this package. So I'd dump all the rules not dealing with > "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song". If someone wants "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" rules he can > ask to have them added to the Fedora package that ships "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" > (if any) In that sense, adding them to a package that has "AR PL ShanHeiSunUni" and "AR PL ZenKai Uni" also violates that rule, yes? Current rules might breaks applications (or just nothing happens and fallback next then though) if no "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" package is installed and vice versa. I don't know how much needs there are to have such rules though. > 4. what's the point of > > > zh > > > monospace > > > 16 > > > ??? My understanding was, they want to have a outlined font instead of bitmap font if the pixel size is out of range what the font support. the original fontconfig conf didn't have a testing of lang though, just added it so that the font has to be added to the list instead of using the priority list. > So to sum up, you've simplified a bit but it needs to be simplified a lot more, > this file tries to be too clever by half and only succeeds in confusing apps > and users Personally we should add all of bitmap fonts to the black list for fontconfig because mixing up the bitmap font and the outlined font looks ugly and they only support limited sizes. that would be highly likely to see such situation. particularly for CJK bitmap fonts. when gathering fonts for different sizes to use enough, the designs among different sizes aren't necessarily consolidated well because they have a lot of glyphs and different authors may has made it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 12:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491963] [japanese-bitmap-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271208.n2RC8T3D007982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491963 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-27 08:08:02 EDT --- Rebuilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 12:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271219.n2RCJmfm010209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #11 from Jon Stanley 2009-03-27 08:19:21 EDT --- And I'm very sorry for it being buried in a mess of bugzilla mail on my side, let me know if you need any help getting this into shape, I'm available for wahtever help you might need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271410.n2REASf1004390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #6 from Qianqian Fang 2009-03-27 10:10:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Failure Case 1: gramps PDF generation This looks to me really should be a cairo bug, as Behdad reported in his upstream bug. Bitmaps are only preferred when rendering on-screen font sizes, i.e. 11px~16px, as defined in 61-wqy-bitmapfont.conf. But for printing, the font sizes should be way bigger than that, and should by-pass bitmap rendering. > > Failure Case 2: pango-view > ========================== > Here is a similar way to reproduce this bug: > LANG=en_US.utf8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "100" > LANG=zh_CN.utf8 pango-view --text "??? test" --font "100" > > English pango renders the Chinese characters as ugly bitmap. > Chinese pango renders the Chinese characters as truetype. Again, I think this is not an issue for wqy-bitmap-fonts, rather, this is an old problem associated with the absence of preferred language (i.e. PANGO_LANGUAGE) when rendering CJK characters under non-CJK locales. Indeed, there are two issues tangled together: First, pango can not tell if "???" are Japanese Kanji or Chinese Hanzi, while PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig rules will be bypassed. Second, as a result of the above, the font rendering is now handled to fontconfig without proper language tag, while the default font orders in fontconfig 65-non-latin is very outdated. Mixed with proprietary fonts with free fonts, low quality fonts with small Unicode coverage were placed in front of more complete and polished fonts. In this case, the rendering of Chinese is horrible, mixed by Japanese Gothic, Mincho and Chinese Song/Kai glyphs, see http://wenq.org/gallery/albums/userpics/10002/confopt_F8_no_wqy-bitmap_en-us.png In order to display Chinese properly under non-CJK fonts, I proposed using wqy-bitmap-fonts as the default CJK fonts for en locales, (many friends and I myself work under en_US locales but want to use Chinese): http://markmail.org/message/waeyjb3hqkpglfgk To solve this issue, I suggest to correct two things: 1. define default PANGO_LANGUAGE definition for non-CJK locales, preferably "zh". Because zh contains more complete unicode coverage (20000 characters vs. 6000 for ja and ko) which will give a more uniform look of the rendering; and there are several default Chinese fonts support large char set, such as wqy-bitmap-fonts (>27000 Hanzi), wqy-unibit-fonts(>27000 Hanzi), wqy-zenhei-fonts (=20932), and all the Arphic fonts (>20000 Hanzi). In comparison, Japanese fonts contains too little Han glyphs, and the quality is not impressive. 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it stay the way it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271419.n2REJBeh006112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #7 from Qianqian Fang 2009-03-27 10:18:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Some feedback (but I'm *not* a CJK user so my opinion does not count much) : > > 1. our current practice is to forbid CJK fontconfig rules bellow 65. The > current package violates this by putting stuff at 61 As I said, because 65-non-latin is extremely outdated, and no one try to chance this situation, plus that you told me it is not good to use prepend_first in the fontconfig files, then, the only way to by-pass the default font rendering order is to use a lower number. That's why I named 85-wqy-bitmapfont.conf to 61-wqy-bitmapfont.conf. It is really 65-non-latin should be fixed, not wqy-bitmap-fonts. > 2. IMHO the fontconfig rules in a package should never declare rules for fonts > not included in this package. So I'd dump all the rules not dealing with > "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song". If someone wants "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" rules he can > ask to have them added to the Fedora package that ships "AR PL ShanHeiSun Uni" > (if any) same as above. > > 3. IMHO it's also bad practice to declare a font in several generic families > choose serif, sans-serif or monospace but not all of them because wqy-bitmap-fonts is not monospaced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271429.n2RETXsu010557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) --- Comment #8 from Warren Togami 2009-03-27 10:29:06 EDT --- Do statements like "quality is not impressive" have agreement from our Japanese developers? This might very well be true, but we need to avoid the appearance of cultural favoritism. > First, pango can not tell if "???" are Japanese Kanji or Chinese Hanzi, while > PANGU_LANGUAGE is not defined under non-CJK language, so, pango will not mark > the character with the proper language tags, and some CJK specific fontconfig > rules will be bypassed. What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs? Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other? > 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it > stay the way it is. What do you suggest for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271454.n2REs7sQ020914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.105.1-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488675] accelerator keys is ignored In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271453.n2RErXK3020608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488675 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:53:07 EDT --- imsettings-0.105.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271447.n2RElsvP027064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-27 10:47:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > What is the purpose of CJK specific fontconfig rules, and why is it necessary > for CJK to behave differently than non-CJK when dealing with CJK-glyphs? > > Do C, J and K fontconfig rules differ from each other? CJK is a mess because Chinese, Japanese and Korean use the same codepoints, but the expected glyphs shapes are different depending on the language you type. The problem exists to a lesser extent for arabic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 16:17:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271617.n2RGHRFL028823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fangqq at gmail.com) | --- Comment #10 from Qianqian Fang 2009-03-27 12:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it > > stay the way it is. > > What do you suggest for this? filed a bug to fontconfig: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 16:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271625.n2RGP6Kd012415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446452(F11Blocker) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-27 12:24:38 EDT --- Setting F11blocker, fontconfig order issue is really a blocker for CJK people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 21:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903272104.n2RL4k5N006501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480469, which changed state. Bug 480469 Summary: [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 21:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903272104.n2RL4jj9006477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2009-03-27 17:04:17 EDT --- Fixed in plplot-5.9.2-4.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Mar 27 21:59:28 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/devel freetype.spec,1.71,1.72 Message-ID: <20090327215928.862F570132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24209 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.71 retrieving revision 1.72 diff -u -r1.71 -r1.72 --- freetype.spec 26 Mar 2009 03:09:05 -0000 1.71 +++ freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0000 1.72 @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ # Patented bytecode interpreter and patented subpixel rendering disabled by default. # Pass '--with bytecode_interpreter' and '--with subpixel_rendering' on rpmbuild # command-line to enable them. -%define _with_subpixel_rendering 1} -%define _without_subpixel_rendering 0} %{!?_with_bytecode_interpreter: %{!?_without_bytecode_interpreter: %define _without_bytecode_interpreter --without-bytecode_interpreter}} %{!?_with_subpixel_rendering: %{!?_without_subpixel_rendering: %define _without_subpixel_rendering --without-subpixel_rendering}} @@ -11,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.9 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -228,6 +226,9 @@ %doc docs/tutorial %changelog +* Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-3 +- Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. + * Wed Mar 25 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.9-2 - Add Provides: freetype-bytecode and freetype-subpixel if built with those options. From behdad at fedoraproject.org Fri Mar 27 22:00:10 2009 From: behdad at fedoraproject.org (Behdad Esfahbod) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rpms/freetype/F-10 freetype.spec,1.64,1.65 Message-ID: <20090327220010.4178470132@cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com> Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24264 Modified Files: freetype.spec Log Message: * Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.7-3 - Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. Index: freetype.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/F-10/freetype.spec,v retrieving revision 1.64 retrieving revision 1.65 diff -u -r1.64 -r1.65 --- freetype.spec 5 Dec 2008 21:20:50 -0000 1.64 +++ freetype.spec 27 Mar 2009 21:59:40 -0000 1.65 @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ # Patented bytecode interpreter and patented subpixel rendering disabled by default. # Pass '--with bytecode_interpreter' and '--with subpixel_rendering' on rpmbuild # command-line to enable them. -%define _with_subpixel_rendering 1} -%define _without_subpixel_rendering 0} %{!?_with_bytecode_interpreter: %{!?_without_bytecode_interpreter: %define _without_bytecode_interpreter --without-bytecode_interpreter}} %{!?_with_subpixel_rendering: %{!?_without_subpixel_rendering: %define _without_subpixel_rendering --without-subpixel_rendering}} @@ -11,7 +9,7 @@ Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine Name: freetype Version: 2.3.7 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} License: FTL or GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freetype.org @@ -213,6 +211,9 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ %changelog +* Wed Mar 27 2009 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.7-3 +- Disable subpixel hinting by default. Was turned on unintentionally. + * Fri Dec 05 2008 Behdad Esfahbod 2.3.7-2 - Add freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch - Resolves: #368561 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 23:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903272316.n2RNGaD1017500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #12 from Jay Hankinson 2009-03-27 19:16:08 EDT --- I've been pretty much swamped myself so no biggie. I've updated the font config and spec files and rebuilt the SRPM to include the changes but I don't have anywhere to upload the files to for review (someone did this for me on the day). Can I e-mail them to one of you to upload? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 28 13:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903281350.n2SDoGjb015185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-28 09:50:15 EDT --- You can always attach the text files (not the full srpm) to this bug. Otherwise if you've completed FAS you probably have a fedorapeople hosting space (or can ask for one on #fedora-admin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 28 07:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487061] Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903280718.n2S7IApB031075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 --- Comment #2 from Akihiro Nomura 2009-03-28 03:17:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=337094) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=337094) Screenshot of gnome-terminal w/ new vlgothic* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 28 07:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487061] Japanese fonts changed to less readable after update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903280717.n2S7HBrJ030997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487061 --- Comment #1 from Akihiro Nomura 2009-03-28 03:16:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=337093) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=337093) Screenshot of gnome-terminal w/ old VLGothic* packages. I faced the same problem and I'm still using old VLGothic-* packages. On this update, font size of terminal get smaller and width of ideograms (like ? and ?) become wrong. In older VLGothic-*, their cosmetic width is hankaku (1/2 of height, like English alphabet) and its actual width (used to calculate the position of next character) is also hankaku. But in new vlgothic-*, their cosmetic width become zenkaku (same as height, like CJK character) but its actual width is treated as hankaku. Please compare the screenshots, I put ideograms without space in left side, and with 1 space between each characters in right side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 29 07:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903290734.n2T7YMHn023343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #14 from Jon Stanley 2009-03-29 03:34:22 EDT --- I had sent Jay an email on an acct that I had setup for him. You can't get fedorapeople until you're in CLA+1, right now he's CLA only :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 29 18:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903291855.n2TItZE3028163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 29 19:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903291945.n2TJjgGr016007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #15 from Jay Hankinson 2009-03-29 15:45:42 EDT --- Uploaded r3 of SRPM and .spec file to http://i.am.jds2001.org/~ukjay SRPM: http://i.am.jds2001.org/~ukjay/chisholm-rubbing-fonts-20090125-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://i.am.jds2001.org/~ukjay/chisholm-rubbing-fonts.spec Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 01:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903300136.n2U1akBl026684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-29 21:36:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > To solve this issue, I suggest to correct two things: > > 1. define default PANGO_LANGUAGE definition for non-CJK locales, preferably > "zh". Because zh contains more complete unicode coverage (20000 characters vs. > 6000 for ja and ko) which will give a more uniform look of the rendering; and > there are several default Chinese fonts support large char set, such as > wqy-bitmap-fonts (>27000 Hanzi), wqy-unibit-fonts(>27000 Hanzi), > wqy-zenhei-fonts (=20932), and all the Arphic fonts (>20000 Hanzi). In > comparison, Japanese fonts contains too little Han glyphs, and the quality is > not impressive. This won't solves anything due to the priority list as I said. for example: % LANG=en_US.utf8 pango-view --text '??? test' --markup --font "100" This doesn't make any difference of result with/without lang tag if wqy-bitmap-fonts is installed. > 2. update 65-non-latin.conf. it is too old and only makes more troubles if it > stay the way it is. I agree with this. we should add it in own fontconfig conf for specific languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 03:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903300340.n2U3epYm014644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #13 from Qianqian Fang 2009-03-29 23:40:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > This won't solves anything due to the priority list as I said. for example: > > % LANG=en_US.utf8 pango-view --text '??? test' --markup > --font "100" > > This doesn't make any difference of result with/without lang tag if > wqy-bitmap-fonts is installed. I tried this on F10, it worked fine. However, when I tried to upgrade F10 to rawhide via yum, it aborted due to some dependency problem (missing dependency: python(abi)). I haven't figured out how to get around. If you are seeing magnified bitmaps rather than vector fonts, there must be something else broken in rawhide, likely cairo as suspected in my first reply. Since nothing was changed for wqy-bitmap-fonts from F10 to F11, I have to know what else caused the problem in order to fix the fontconfig settings, if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 05:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492510] Regression: wqy-bitmap-fonts preferred font over truetype fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903300513.n2U5DVpJ029158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492510 --- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH 2009-03-30 01:13:30 EDT --- It's not magnified but drawing different size of glyphs for "???" and "test". As Warren said, this strange behavior is gone if uninstalling wqy-bitmap-fonts package, or removing "WenQuanYi Bitmap Song" from 65-nonlatin.conf and the priority list rule from 61-wqy-bitmapsong.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 07:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903300703.n2U73Mnw027101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-03-30 03:03:20 EDT --- Made a symlink -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 07:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903300703.n2U73NFd027123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477372, which changed state. Bug 477372 Summary: [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 13:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491962] [ghostscript-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301359.n2UDxsed003569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 16:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301601.n2UG1RmM000384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301915.n2UJFgtg008513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-30 15:15:41 EDT --- Initial review: 1. please use "oflb" not "ofl" as prefix, since OFL is already commonly used to identify a license the Open Font Library folks use OFLB to designate themselves 2. you have the wrong font name in your fontconfig file 3. you have some stray %defines, we're supposed to use %globals nowadays 4. %common_desc is not really useful for anything in a mono-font spec file, though I suppose it's harmless 5. your metadata declaration order is unusual, though it'll probably only annoy people diffing spec files Nothing too difficult to fix for an experienced packager, and only 1 and 2 dangerous. Thank you for continuing to add fonts to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490364] Package does not build in rawhide In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301937.n2UJbdkM024129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490364 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-30 15:37:38 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477418 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301937.n2UJbeWU024157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 Bug 477418 depends on bug 490364, which changed state. Bug 490364 Summary: Package does not build in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490364 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-30 15:37:38 EDT --- *** Bug 490364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301938.n2UJcUpa013792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-30 15:38:29 EDT --- Also upstream has released a new major version. Was even featured on lwn.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301943.n2UJhK7c025548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-03-30 15:43:19 EDT --- Initial review: 1. you have some stray %defines, we're supposed to use %globals nowadays 2. I'd use the same priority as cosmetica, unless you want this font to always come first 3. I'd use the substitution template /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf and add two substitution blocks, one to tell this font can be used in stead of Optima if Optima is not present, and the other to do the same for "MgOpen Cosmetica" (and you can probably open a bug on the mgopen package to make its packager return the courtesy and add a rule that says Cosmetica can be used in stead of Epigrafica) 4. %common_desc is not really useful for anything in a mono-font spec file, though I suppose it's harmless 5. your metadata declaration order is unusual, though it'll probably only annoy people diffing spec files 6. rpmlint warns of epigrafica-fonts.src: W: invalid-license MgOpen epigrafica-fonts.src: W: strange-permission convert-to-ttf.pe 0755 At least the second one can probably be dealt with easily -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 22:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491974] [wqy-zenhei-fonts] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903302249.n2UMn4TT004591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491974 Qianqian Fang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Qianqian Fang 2009-03-30 18:49:03 EDT --- done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 12:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903311239.n2VCdfO7001450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis at di.uoa.gr --- Comment #2 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-03-31 08:39:40 EDT --- There is another submission of the same font package in bug #484057 (which seems stale for about a month and a half). Don't know whether the original submitter abandoned it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 13:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903311325.n2VDPKpj012971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-03-31 09:25:19 EDT --- Closing this out as a dupe. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484057 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 22:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492797] Review Request: ofl-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts - Clean serif font based on Kennerly Old Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903312203.n2VM3ZCo021855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-03-31 18:03:34 EDT --- Four out of five fixed: New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/oflb-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/oflb-goudy-bookletter-1911-fonts-20080206-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.