From chris.stone at gmail.com Wed Jul 5 19:51:01 2006 From: chris.stone at gmail.com (Christopher Stone) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:51:01 -0700 Subject: packaging a lib which needs to be compiled in different ways for different users In-Reply-To: <44A58ACF.3080700@hhs.nl> References: <44A58ACF.3080700@hhs.nl> Message-ID: On 6/30/06, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > I and Eitch are currently looking into packaging ode (a physics > library). Ode uses OPCODE which is a 3D collision detection library. > > Opcode is included in ode's sources but is used by many opensource > projects to name 2: > -crystal space > -ode > > Opcode can be compiled to use either callbacks to get the next object > from a list of objects that need to be checked for collisions _OR_ to > use an array of pointers to these objects. however it cannot be compiled > to support both! And it has more compile time options like these which > are likely to be used in a mix and match style by other projects. > > Also all projects using opcode seem to have made their own additions to > it, now these extra overloaded operators and methods could be merged > into the mainline, but thats going to be a pain, because then each time > a new package using opcode is going to get packaged any functionality > added to opcode by this application much first be merged into our > seperate opcode package. > > And even with that done we still have the compile time options. Notice > that I gave one example, but that there are atleast 2 options which lead > to incompatible libs, so thats 4 versions of the lib. and that is only > after checking the 3 options modifed from the default settings by ode > and crystalspace, so thats 2 out of 3 :| > > All in all this leads me to the conclusion that its best to make an > exception to the rule: "libraries with a seperate upstream yet included > in the sourcetarbal must not be used" in the case of opcode. > > Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any objections? Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode, crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and if one project can use another's opcode it can do so? From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Jul 5 20:00:56 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:00:56 +0200 Subject: packaging a lib which needs to be compiled in different ways for different users In-Reply-To: References: <44A58ACF.3080700@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <44AC1A78.9000008@hhs.nl> Christopher Stone wrote: > On 6/30/06, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I and Eitch are currently looking into packaging ode (a physics >> library). Ode uses OPCODE which is a 3D collision detection library. >> >> Opcode is included in ode's sources but is used by many opensource >> projects to name 2: >> -crystal space >> -ode >> >> Opcode can be compiled to use either callbacks to get the next object >> from a list of objects that need to be checked for collisions _OR_ to >> use an array of pointers to these objects. however it cannot be compiled >> to support both! And it has more compile time options like these which >> are likely to be used in a mix and match style by other projects. >> >> Also all projects using opcode seem to have made their own additions to >> it, now these extra overloaded operators and methods could be merged >> into the mainline, but thats going to be a pain, because then each time >> a new package using opcode is going to get packaged any functionality >> added to opcode by this application much first be merged into our >> seperate opcode package. >> >> And even with that done we still have the compile time options. Notice >> that I gave one example, but that there are atleast 2 options which lead >> to incompatible libs, so thats 4 versions of the lib. and that is only >> after checking the 3 options modifed from the default settings by ode >> and crystalspace, so thats 2 out of 3 :| >> >> All in all this leads me to the conclusion that its best to make an >> exception to the rule: "libraries with a seperate upstream yet included >> in the sourcetarbal must not be used" in the case of opcode. >> >> Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any objections? > > Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode, > crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part > into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and > if one project can use another's opcode it can do so? > Erm, no I think the effort needed to make that work is not worth the gain. Regards, Hans From hugo at devin.com.br Wed Jul 5 20:27:42 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:27:42 -0300 Subject: packaging a lib which needs to be compiled in different ways for different users In-Reply-To: <44AC1A78.9000008@hhs.nl> References: <44A58ACF.3080700@hhs.nl> <44AC1A78.9000008@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <200607051727.42852.hugo@devin.com.br> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:00, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any objections? > > > > Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode, > > crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part > > into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and > > if one project can use another's opcode it can do so? > > Erm, no I think the effort needed to make that work is not worth the gain. +1 > Regards, > Hans -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From hugo at devin.com.br Thu Jul 6 06:56:24 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 03:56:24 -0300 Subject: Fedora Gaming Writings: wesnoth Message-ID: <200607060356.24693.hugo@devin.com.br> Hi, Another game page was done: ? ?http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games/wesnoth It needs: ? ?* English revision * More content (optional) Thanks! -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From hugo at devin.com.br Thu Jul 6 07:00:33 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 04:00:33 -0300 Subject: Fwd: Re: Suggested Game for Fedora Gaming Message-ID: <200607060400.33703.hugo@devin.com.br> Hey guys, just forwarding a suggestion I got on my email ;-) che did try this game yesterday and got some easy-to-fix compilation issues (extra qualification on c++ code that is incompatible with gcc 4.1+). ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Suggested Game for Fedora Gaming Date: Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:57 From: Jason Apfelbeck To: Hugo Cisneiros Great, thanks, that is what I was hoping for. Seems like a good game but last time I tried it it still needed some work in multiplayer as well as AI. On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 14:36 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > Hi Jason, sorry for the delay in the answer :-) > > On Monday 26 June 2006 23:47, you wrote: > > I saw the Fedora Gaming Wiki and thought that Dark Oberon would be a > > great game to be listed here. > > > > Dark Oberon is an open source real-time strategy game similar to > > Warcraft II released under GPL. It has got awesome graphics - textures > > created from shots of real models made out of plasticine! > > http://dark-oberon.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Screenshots > > http://dark-oberon.sourceforge.net/?page=screenshots > > Great! I didn't know about the game, and it appears that it's not included > in Fedora Extras. The Fedora Gaming Page contains only games available for > Fedora. I'll submit a request to try to build Dark Oberon on Fedora Extras, > then the users may install it with yum officially. > > Once the game is in Fedora Extras, we'll add to the list of available games > for Fedora, and of course, we'll make some review of it as we're doing with > others ;-) > > Thanks for your suggestion! > > > Thanks > > Jay ------------------------------------------------------- -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro Thu Jul 6 07:46:11 2006 From: nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro (Nicu Buculei) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:46:11 +0300 Subject: Fedora Gaming Writings: wesnoth In-Reply-To: <200607060356.24693.hugo@devin.com.br> References: <200607060356.24693.hugo@devin.com.br> Message-ID: <44ACBFC3.50706@nicubunu.ro> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > Hi, > > Another game page was done: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games/wesnoth > > It needs: > > * English revision > * More content (optional) Suggestion: at least one paragraph about the map editor, which is a separate package (wesnoth-tools) -- nicu Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro From seg at haxxed.com Thu Jul 6 07:55:13 2006 From: seg at haxxed.com (Callum Lerwick) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:55:13 -0500 Subject: Second Life Message-ID: <1152172513.2975.39.camel@localhost> I have made a package for the Second Life client. It's ugly, and it obviously can't go into extras, but it works for me: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife-1.10.5.1-1.nosrc.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From hugo at devin.com.br Thu Jul 6 19:40:27 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:40:27 -0300 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list Message-ID: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> Hi all, Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC on our bugzilla review requests and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the package, or help. I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some opinions :-) -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 6 19:33:48 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:33:48 -0700 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> Message-ID: <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > Hi all, > > Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better communicate our > packaging proccess. What if we add the fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC > on our bugzilla review requests and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? > > With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the package, > or help. > > I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the focus on > this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some opinions :-) +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least until we see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates. --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 6 19:40:50 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:40:50 +0200 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> Message-ID: <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> Michael Thomas wrote: > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better communicate our >> packaging proccess. What if we add the fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC >> on our bugzilla review requests and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? >> >> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the package, >> or help. >> >> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the focus on >> this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some opinions :-) > > +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. > +1 too Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start > -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least until we > see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates. > -1 too, although I might be interested in some game packages bugs (like libs packages of mine use) I'm not interested in all game packages bugs and I get way too much mail as is already. Regards, Hans From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 6 19:42:21 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:42:21 +0200 Subject: Talking about Reviews (Ogre, Chess, Coldet) Message-ID: <44AD679D.1040007@hhs.nl> Talking about Reviews, any chance we could get some movements on these 3: Ogre, Chess & Coldet? AFAIK there are no real problems with them and multiple peope interested, so getting them moving really shouldnt' be that hard. Regards, Hans From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 6 19:40:46 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:40:46 -0700 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <44AD673E.40407@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > > Michael Thomas wrote: > >>Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better communicate our >>>packaging proccess. What if we add the fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC >>>on our bugzilla review requests and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? >>> >>>With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the package, >>>or help. >>> >>>I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the focus on >>>this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some opinions :-) >> >>+1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. >> > > +1 too > > Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I > vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing > a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start I also think it should complete it, not replace it. The wiki is the only place to get the complete list of games needing or under review. --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 6 19:43:04 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:43:04 -0700 Subject: Talking about Reviews (Ogre, Chess, Coldet) In-Reply-To: <44AD679D.1040007@hhs.nl> References: <44AD679D.1040007@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <44AD67C8.4060407@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > Talking about Reviews, > > any chance we could get some movements on these 3: > Ogre, Chess & Coldet? > > AFAIK there are no real problems with them and multiple peope > interested, so getting them moving really shouldnt' be that hard. I've started a review of ogre; I just need to check a few more things before posting it. If nobody picks up coldet and chess by this weekend then I'll probably do those as well. --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From hugo at devin.com.br Thu Jul 6 19:57:36 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:57:36 -0300 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <200607061657.36749.hugo@devin.com.br> On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:40, Hans de Goede wrote: > Michael Thomas wrote: > > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better > >> communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the > >> fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC on our bugzilla review requests > >> and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? > >> > >> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the > >> package, or help. > >> > >> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the > >> focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some > >> opinions :-) > > > > +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. > > +1 too +1 here :-) > Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I > vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing > a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start I think it completes as well. The mail is only a good notification system that you can always ignore if you want ;) The wiki can be a complete and always present list. The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla at redhat.com is allowed to post here? > > -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least until we > > see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates. > > -1 too, although I might be interested in some game packages bugs (like > libs packages of mine use) I'm not interested in all game packages bugs > and I get way too much mail as is already. I agree with these opinions. -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 6 19:54:19 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:54:19 +0200 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <200607061657.36749.hugo@devin.com.br> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> <200607061657.36749.hugo@devin.com.br> Message-ID: <44AD6A6B.1050807@hhs.nl> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:40, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Michael Thomas wrote: >>> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better >>>> communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the >>>> fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC on our bugzilla review requests >>>> and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)? >>>> >>>> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the >>>> package, or help. >>>> >>>> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the >>>> focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some >>>> opinions :-) >>> +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews. >> +1 too > > +1 here :-) > >> Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I >> vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing >> a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start > > I think it completes as well. The mail is only a good notification system that > you can always ignore if you want ;) The wiki can be a complete and always > present list. > > The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla at redhat.com is > allowed to post here? > Probably not, but that can be fixed. Wart, can you fix this, you've got admin rights (I know I've admin rights too, but I lost the password :( ) Regards, Hans From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 6 19:53:29 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:53:29 -0700 Subject: CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list In-Reply-To: <44AD6A6B.1050807@hhs.nl> References: <200607061640.27333.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD659C.3060206@kobold.org> <44AD6742.8020408@hhs.nl> <200607061657.36749.hugo@devin.com.br> <44AD6A6B.1050807@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <44AD6A39.2040804@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > >>The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla at redhat.com is >>allowed to post here? >> > > > Probably not, but that can be fixed. Wart, can you fix this, you've got > admin rights (I know I've admin rights too, but I lost the password :( ) It's certainly possible. I'll get it set up. --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 6 19:57:32 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:57:32 +0200 Subject: Talking about Reviews (Ogre, Chess, Coldet) In-Reply-To: <44AD67C8.4060407@kobold.org> References: <44AD679D.1040007@hhs.nl> <44AD67C8.4060407@kobold.org> Message-ID: <44AD6B2C.9030502@hhs.nl> Michael Thomas wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: >> Talking about Reviews, >> >> any chance we could get some movements on these 3: >> Ogre, Chess & Coldet? >> >> AFAIK there are no real problems with them and multiple peope >> interested, so getting them moving really shouldnt' be that hard. > > I've started a review of ogre; I just need to check a few more things > before posting it. If nobody picks up coldet and chess by this weekend > then I'll probably do those as well. > Cool, Thanks! Regards, Hans From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:07:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:07:13 -0400 Subject: Your Bugzilla password. Message-ID: <200607062007.k66K7DA9022306@bugzilla.redhat.com> To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: E-mail address: fedora-games-list at redhat.com Password: oHZ6zuIUc0 To change your password, go to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 6 20:13:03 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:13:03 -0700 Subject: Your Bugzilla password. In-Reply-To: <200607062007.k66K7DA9022306@bugzilla.redhat.com> References: <200607062007.k66K7DA9022306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Message-ID: <44AD6ECF.306@kobold.org> bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: > > E-mail address: fedora-games-list at redhat.com [...] Yes, I'm an idiot. No worries, I've already fixed it. --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 20:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062014.k66KEwWf022751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wayward4now at gmail.com Thu Jul 6 21:47:11 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:47:11 -0400 Subject: Your Bugzilla password. In-Reply-To: <44AD6ECF.306@kobold.org> References: <200607062007.k66K7DA9022306@bugzilla.redhat.com> <44AD6ECF.306@kobold.org> Message-ID: <1152222431.4915.68.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 13:13 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > > To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following: > > > > E-mail address: fedora-games-list at redhat.com > [...] > > Yes, I'm an idiot. No worries, I've already fixed it. It's good to not see a man in denial. Ric From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062251.k66Mppoe001533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 22:52:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062252.k66MqBo0001563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 23:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607062327.k66NRupu002535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-06 19:19 EST ------- MUST ==== * Package/spec named appropriately * Source matches upstream: 26c2db12ec5ad2d7a0b1d0fe2597ed4a coldet_11.zip * LGPL license ok, license file included * rpmlint output clean * spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds ok in mock on FC4, FC5, and FC6 for both i386 and x86_64 * No excessive BR: (no BR: at all!) * ldconfig called in %post/%postud as needed * headers and unversioned .so properly located in -devel subpackage * Owns all directories that it creates; doesn't own directories that it should not. * No locales * No .desktop file needed * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files * File permissions look ok * No libtool archives MUSTFIX ======= * -devel subpackage missing the -%{release} component of e-v-r when requiring the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wayward4now at gmail.com Thu Jul 6 23:43:35 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:43:35 -0400 Subject: Second Life In-Reply-To: <1152172513.2975.39.camel@localhost> References: <1152172513.2975.39.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1152229415.4915.70.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 02:55 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > I have made a package for the Second Life client. It's ugly, and it > obviously can't go into extras, but it works for me: > > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife-1.10.5.1-1 Is the game package available? Or is it a non-free game? Ric From seg at haxxed.com Fri Jul 7 03:52:34 2006 From: seg at haxxed.com (Callum Lerwick) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:52:34 -0500 Subject: Second Life In-Reply-To: <1152229415.4915.70.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> References: <1152172513.2975.39.camel@localhost> <1152229415.4915.70.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> Message-ID: <1152244356.2975.58.camel@localhost> On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 19:43 -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 02:55 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > I have made a package for the Second Life client. It's ugly, and it > > obviously can't go into extras, but it works for me: > > > > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife-1.10.5.1-1 > > Is the game package available? Or is it a non-free game? Ric Non-free as in freedom, yes. Its closed source, available as an i686 binary only. I think you can play for free as in beer these days, and you don't even need a credit card... I haven't been able to find the actual license terms for the client. It includes license texts for all the libraries it uses, but I didn't see any for the actual client. Thus I don't know what their redistribution policy is, so I'm distributing a nosrc.rpm for now. Linden Lab has been rather community friendly, reverse engineering the protocol has actually been okayed as long as it's "in good faith" for example. I posted to the SL Linux Alpha forum, and... no responses at all so far. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071132.k67BWf4Y007738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 07:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > MUSTFIX > ======= > * -devel subpackage missing the -%{release} component of e-v-r when requiring > the base package. Fixed, new version is here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 11:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 07:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071133.k67BXA8c007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 07:24 EST ------- Correction that should be: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/coldet-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 15:16:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071516.k67FGPfW021816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-07 11:07 EST ------- All MUSTFIX items addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:43:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196710] Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071843.k67IhevZ008594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-07 14:35 EST ------- Thanks! Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 18:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071843.k67Ihrj2008666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196710, which changed state. Bug 196710 Summary: Review Request: coldet - 3D Collision Detection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196710 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 7 19:39:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607071939.k67JdpZe013987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 Bug 196744 depends on bug 196740, which changed state. Bug 196740 Summary: Review Request: ogre - Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 20:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082012.k68KCqoC020455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 8 20:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607082021.k68KLEej020661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-07-08 16:12 EST ------- This ran fine for me on FC4-x86_64 with a NVidia 6800 and the binary NVidia drivers. Average of ~53 fps. MUST ==== * Source matches upstream, with the noted exception that the copyrighted ttf file has been removed. * Package and spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * .desktop file installed correctly * icon cache updated properly * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where it ought to be * Owns directories that it creates * Does not own directories that it should not * Builds in mock on FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64 * No need for -devel or -doc subpackages * No locales * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files SHOULD ====== * Use 'convert -transparent black ...' to make the desktop icon background transparent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 9 08:44:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 04:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196744] Review Request: chess - 3D chess game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607090844.k698iEap031776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chess - 3D chess game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196744 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-09 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > SHOULD > ====== > * Use 'convert -transparent black ...' to make the desktop icon background > transparent. > Good idea, but it cannnot be done (atleast not that way) I created (gimped) the icon from a screen shot and that black is far from black, also its not one color and it contains a reflection of the chess piece. > APPROVED Thanks a million for this and the other reviews! Imported & build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 13 03:25:38 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:55:38 +0530 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? Message-ID: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> Hi http://entertainment.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/0414224&from=rss This is a Fedora Extras wishlist item - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList Just checking to see if anyone in the Games SIG is interested in packaging this. Rahul From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 13 05:13:06 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:13:06 -0700 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? In-Reply-To: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> References: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> Rahul wrote: > > Hi > > > http://entertainment.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/0414224&from=rss > > This is a Fedora Extras wishlist item - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList > > Just checking to see if anyone in the Games SIG is interested in > packaging this. > > Rahul > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-games-list mailing list > Fedora-games-list at redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list Thanks for the tip! I'm working on a spec file now. There is a problem with the licensing for some of the textures (see below). Does "other non-commercial applications" imply that commercial applications are prohibited? And does Fedora count as "Bulk redistribution"? --Mike --------------------------------------------------- Media License Exceptions --- All shaderlab (http://www.shaderlab.com/) textures (by Randy 'ydnar' Reddig) are subject to the following license: Usage and redistribution policy: Textures may be freely downloaded, modified, and used in free maps, mods or total conversions provided this copyright notice is left intact and a link to Shaderlab is provided in the credits or read-me file. Other non-commercial applications are considered on a case-by-case basis via e-mail. All other usage requires written permission. Bulk redistribution or archival of the textures in any medium, digital or otherwise (except mapping packages for mods) is prohibited. From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Thu Jul 13 05:19:38 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:49:38 +0530 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? In-Reply-To: <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> References: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> Message-ID: <44B5D7EA.80300@fedoraproject.org> Wart wrote: > Rahul wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> http://entertainment.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/0414224&from=rss >> >> This is a Fedora Extras wishlist item - >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList >> >> Just checking to see if anyone in the Games SIG is interested in >> packaging this. >> >> Rahul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-games-list mailing list >> Fedora-games-list at redhat.com >> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list > > Thanks for the tip! I'm working on a spec file now. > > There is a problem with the licensing for some of the textures (see > below). Does "other non-commercial applications" imply that commercial > applications are prohibited? And does Fedora count as "Bulk > redistribution"? > > --Mike It would be best to get written clarification on what this means for Fedora and if upstream clarifies that Fedora is allowed to distribute it ,include a copy of that mail in the Fedora package itself. Note that restrictions on commercial usage is against the Free software and open source definition and unacceptable for Fedora. Rahul From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 13 21:51:21 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:51:21 -0700 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? In-Reply-To: <44B5D7EA.80300@fedoraproject.org> References: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> <44B5D7EA.80300@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <44B6C059.6040406@kobold.org> Rahul wrote: > Wart wrote: >> Thanks for the tip! I'm working on a spec file now. >> >> There is a problem with the licensing for some of the textures (see >> below). Does "other non-commercial applications" imply that commercial >> applications are prohibited? And does Fedora count as "Bulk >> redistribution"? >> >> --Mike > > > It would be best to get written clarification on what this means for > Fedora and if upstream clarifies that Fedora is allowed to distribute it > ,include a copy of that mail in the Fedora package itself. Note that > restrictions on commercial usage is against the Free software and open > source definition and unacceptable for Fedora. > > Rahul I've got the start to a spec file: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tremulous.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/tremulous.desktop It builds and runs fine on FC4-x86_64. But it still needs a little more work to clean up the dependencies on the internal copy of libjpeg, unzip, and some SDL/openal header files. And as mentioned above, there is still the license issue to clear up. Anyone can feel free to take over this spec. I probably won't do much more with it as I've got a handful of other packages that I'm preparing to submit for review. --Wart From wart at kobold.org Thu Jul 13 22:37:04 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:37:04 -0700 Subject: Wesnoth tournaments Message-ID: <44B6CB10.9080001@kobold.org> A few months ago Warren had the idea of setting up Wesnoth game tournaments. I thought it was a good idea at the time, and still do, but never got around to trying to arrange anything (mostly because this got me sucked into playin wesnoth myself). Would anyone be interested in helping to organize something like this? We could have some sort of elimination competition, keep a running ranking ladder, and/or archives of replays of notable games. Thoughts? Volunteers? --Wart From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Fri Jul 14 15:07:22 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:07:22 +0200 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? In-Reply-To: <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> References: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> Message-ID: <44B7B32A.9050102@hhs.nl> Wart wrote: > Rahul wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> http://entertainment.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/06/0414224&from=rss >> >> This is a Fedora Extras wishlist item - >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/WishList >> >> Just checking to see if anyone in the Games SIG is interested in >> packaging this. >> >> Rahul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-games-list mailing list >> Fedora-games-list at redhat.com >> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list > > Thanks for the tip! I'm working on a spec file now. > > There is a problem with the licensing for some of the textures (see > below). Does "other non-commercial applications" imply that commercial > applications are prohibited? And does Fedora count as "Bulk > redistribution"? > HI all, I'm back from vacation, actually tremolous was on my hitlist for a while (see my wiki page) I just never got around to it, no problem you're doing it though! About the non-commercial clause. I believe that this clause only is active when using the textures in anotherway then with tremolous, is that right? If use within tremolous is not limited to noncommercial use only (iow you may put tremolous on a CD for say xbox and sell it with these textures) then things are fine. There is other content which also is only licensed for used with the free sw game/program it comes with and AFAIK thats allowed. Regards, Hans > --Mike > > --------------------------------------------------- Media License > Exceptions --- > All shaderlab (http://www.shaderlab.com/) textures (by Randy 'ydnar' Reddig) > are subject to the following license: > > Usage and redistribution policy: Textures may be freely downloaded, > modified, > and used in free maps, mods or total conversions provided this copyright > notice is left intact and a link to Shaderlab is provided in the > credits or > read-me file. Other non-commercial applications are considered on a > case-by-case basis via e-mail. All other usage requires written > permission. > Bulk redistribution or archival of the textures in any medium, digital or > otherwise (except mapping packages for mods) is prohibited. > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-games-list mailing list > Fedora-games-list at redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list > From wayward4now at gmail.com Fri Jul 14 21:47:31 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:47:31 -0400 Subject: Tremulous: The best free software game ever? In-Reply-To: <44B7B32A.9050102@hhs.nl> References: <44B5BD32.8040407@fedoraproject.org> <44B5D662.80607@kobold.org> <44B7B32A.9050102@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <1152913651.11939.196.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Wart wrote: > > Thanks for the tip! I'm working on a spec file now. > > > > There is a problem with the licensing for some of the textures (see > > below). Does "other non-commercial applications" imply that commercial > > applications are prohibited? And does Fedora count as "Bulk > > redistribution"? It seems to my perspective that the injunction is against any one ripping the graphics for a commercial application ($$$) for distribution not against distributing the package as a whole without modification. That's my 2 cents. At a 100 megs it's a big sucker! Dnloading it now, getting the whole enchilada. Ric From lmacken at redhat.com Mon Jul 17 03:17:02 2006 From: lmacken at redhat.com (Luke Macken) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:17:02 -0400 Subject: Wesnoth tournaments In-Reply-To: <44B6CB10.9080001@kobold.org> References: <44B6CB10.9080001@kobold.org> Message-ID: <20060717031701.GA10099@crow.nc.rr.com> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:37:04PM -0700, Wart wrote: > A few months ago Warren had the idea of setting up Wesnoth game > tournaments. I thought it was a good idea at the time, and still do, > but never got around to trying to arrange anything (mostly because this > got me sucked into playin wesnoth myself). Would anyone be interested > in helping to organize something like this? We could have some sort of > elimination competition, keep a running ranking ladder, and/or archives > of replays of notable games. > > Thoughts? Volunteers? I'm totally down. Someone should first setup a dedicated server, then we can organize some sort of running stats/ranking/tournaments. luke From wart at kobold.org Mon Jul 17 04:50:56 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:50:56 -0500 Subject: Wesnoth tournaments In-Reply-To: <20060717031701.GA10099@crow.nc.rr.com> References: <44B6CB10.9080001@kobold.org> <20060717031701.GA10099@crow.nc.rr.com> Message-ID: <44BB1730.7020401@kobold.org> Luke Macken wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:37:04PM -0700, Wart wrote: >> A few months ago Warren had the idea of setting up Wesnoth game >> tournaments. I thought it was a good idea at the time, and still do, >> but never got around to trying to arrange anything (mostly because this >> got me sucked into playin wesnoth myself). Would anyone be interested >> in helping to organize something like this? We could have some sort of >> elimination competition, keep a running ranking ladder, and/or archives >> of replays of notable games. >> >> Thoughts? Volunteers? > > I'm totally down. > > Someone should first setup a dedicated server, then we can organize some > sort of running stats/ranking/tournaments. I just recently set up a machine for such a purpose. I'll get wesnoth running on it in the next couple of days. In the meantime, is anyone aware of any software for running a game ranking system? --Wart From wart at kobold.org Mon Jul 17 14:52:56 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:52:56 -0500 Subject: Wesnoth tournaments In-Reply-To: <20060717031701.GA10099@crow.nc.rr.com> References: <44B6CB10.9080001@kobold.org> <20060717031701.GA10099@crow.nc.rr.com> Message-ID: <44BBA448.8060804@kobold.org> Luke Macken wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:37:04PM -0700, Wart wrote: >> A few months ago Warren had the idea of setting up Wesnoth game >> tournaments. I thought it was a good idea at the time, and still do, >> but never got around to trying to arrange anything (mostly because this >> got me sucked into playin wesnoth myself). Would anyone be interested >> in helping to organize something like this? We could have some sort of >> elimination competition, keep a running ranking ladder, and/or archives >> of replays of notable games. >> >> Thoughts? Volunteers? > > I'm totally down. > > Someone should first setup a dedicated server, then we can organize some > sort of running stats/ranking/tournaments. I set up a dedicated server at wesnoth.kobold.org --Wart From hugo at devin.com.br Tue Jul 18 16:49:46 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:49:46 -0300 Subject: xmoto Review Message-ID: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> Hi guys, Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in FE? The link for the review is in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 Thanks! -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181853.k6IIrZbR015610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-07-18 14:44 EST ------- Tried building in mock, this package needs libGLU-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 18 18:54:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607181854.k6IIs88S015729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Tue Jul 18 20:43:18 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:43:18 +0200 Subject: xmoto Review In-Reply-To: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> References: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> Message-ID: <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > Hi guys, > > Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in FE? > The link for the review is in: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 > > Thanks! > Hi, I'll review your ode using game if you'll review mine, deal? : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 Regards, Hans From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Tue Jul 18 20:49:36 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:49:36 +0200 Subject: sirius orphaned?? Message-ID: <44BD4960.2030102@hhs.nl> Hi, I keep seeing sirius on the orphaned list, but its not in CVS, so there is nothing to unorphan I think we should remove it from the SIG wiki page. Regards, Hans From wart at kobold.org Tue Jul 18 21:30:14 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:30:14 -0700 Subject: sirius orphaned?? In-Reply-To: <44BD4960.2030102@hhs.nl> References: <44BD4960.2030102@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <44BD52E6.4080503@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I keep seeing sirius on the orphaned list, but its not in CVS, so there > is nothing to unorphan I think we should remove it from the SIG wiki page. Go ahead and remove it. I added it a while back after seeing it on some orphan list somewhere. --Mike From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190435.k6J4ZHUx010527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-19 00:26 EST ------- Package updated with fix from Comment #2: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SPECS/xmoto.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/fextras/SRPMS/xmoto-0.1.16-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 04:39:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190439.k6J4dBDn010811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-games-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190611.k6J6B29w015384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:02 EST ------- == Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored == Mock build for rawhide i386 is failed. I added some BR's alsa-lib-devel,libX11-devel,libXmu-devel,libXi-devel. I did it and again did mock build and its successfull. * MUST Items: - rpmlint shows no errors - dist tag is present. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The spec file name matching the base package Sturmbahnfahrer, in the format Sturmbahnfahrer.spec. - This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - This package includes License file COPYING. - This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc. - The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (25d8907b234c9ebaa91c590c6fcbf9ba) - This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386 architecture. - This package did not containd any ExcludeArch. - This package owns all directories that it creates. - This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - This package used macros. - Document files are included like JOYSTICKS LICENCE README TODO. - Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives. - Desktop file installed correctly and its icon is also visible. Also, * Source URL is present and working. * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Package worked fine on i386. You need to add BRs as mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:13:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190613.k6J6DcgJ015446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 06:46:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190646.k6J6kBgB016899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 02:37 EST ------- Thanks, New version which fixes the report mock problems here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sturmbahnfahrer-1.1-2.src.rpm Changes: * Wed Jul 19 2006 Hans de Goede 1.1-2 - Add missing BR: alsa-lib-devel - Stop linking with the unused libs: -lXmu -lXi -lX11 (-lX11 is used indirectly, through other libs but not directly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190702.k6J722Ua017700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:53 EST ------- But i got mock build errors for each of mentioned BR's And i added them one by one,not at same compile time. Whenever i got ld error i added that respective BR. You said its unused linking. ok. then how can i prevent mock to give errors in mock build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190707.k6J77qj4017972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 02:58 EST ------- Check Makefile. there you will find LIBS tag thats asking to include all those BR's. If u r sure -lXmu -lXi -lX11 then modify that Makefile and remove those libs. But i think you must require all those BR's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hugo at devin.com.br Wed Jul 19 07:31:52 2006 From: hugo at devin.com.br (Hugo Cisneiros) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:31:52 -0300 Subject: xmoto Review In-Reply-To: <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> References: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <200607190431.52766.hugo@devin.com.br> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in > > FE? The link for the review is in: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 > > > > Thanks! > > Hi, > > I'll review your ode using game if you'll review mine, deal? : > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 I came later on that, so I'm following the panemade at gmail.com review and after this I'll do an official one double-checking things ;-) > Regards, > Hans Cheers! -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190739.k6J7d8UN020682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 03:30 EST ------- I'm sure, I'm the packager of plib and for some reason the plib docs advice linking against -lXi and -lXmu, while both are not used ANYWHERE in plib. Now X11 is used, but the game does not call any X11 functions itself directly. Thus it should not link against it, if oneday the libs it uses start support direct GL rendering with xgl or something like that then X11 will no longer be needed. So removing those flags from the LIBS line is exactly what I've done in the new package linked to above. Having a package drag in unused libs through yum etc, is not what I would call a feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:51:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190751.k6J7pKHj022189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-19 03:42 EST ------- The new package builds fine in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 07:52:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 03:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190752.k6J7qObU022319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-07-19 03:43 EST ------- Oops, the new package builds fine in mock and rpmlint does not produce any output. This was what I meant :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 08:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190819.k6J8Jdf9024604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-19 04:10 EST ------- Yes. The updated package builds fine in mock. I have not looked in your new package when i replied in comment 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 09:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607190951.k6J9p3L7030912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 05:42 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok (see below) * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * .desktop file as required and properly installed Should fix: =========== *Redundant BR: SDL-devel (already required through SDL_mixer-devel)requires and and zlib-devel (through libpng-devel), please remove those from the BR-s No blockers -> approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 15:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191557.k6JFvJPH023395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: 'Steer left less than' 'Steer right greater than' I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". 2. Running it issues this error message: ... Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. Underrrun! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 19 17:02:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607191702.k6JH2upI028489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: 'Steer left less than' 'Steer right greater than' I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". 2. Running it issues this error message: ... Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. Underrrun! ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-19 12:53 EST ------- > ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-07-19 11:46 EST ------- > I ran sturmbahnfahrer and so far noticed 2 issues: > > 1. Something is broken with the keyboard mapping: > The "Examine keyboard controls" page says: > 'Steer left less than' > 'Steer right greater than' > > I found "left/right" on "," rsp. ".". > Which on a "normal" qwerty keyboard are the < > keys, I guess this is different on a German keyboard? > 2. Running it issues this error message: > ... > Your plib (version 1.8.4) has a bug in the 3ds loader. Workaround enabled. > Underrrun! > Hmm, besides that does it work? plib 1.8.4 is the latest release, I can get the fix for the 3ds loader from CVS, but since this message and the workaround are enabled based on a version check that won't help. The underrun message just means the soundbuffer got drained completly before it got a chance to fill it if that message doesn't happen often its harmless. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wayward4now at gmail.com Thu Jul 20 01:01:47 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:01:47 -0400 Subject: xmoto Review In-Reply-To: <200607190431.52766.hugo@devin.com.br> References: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> <200607190431.52766.hugo@devin.com.br> Message-ID: <1153357307.9350.52.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 04:31 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in > > > FE? The link for the review is in: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Hi, > > > > I'll review your ode using game if you'll review mine, deal? : > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 Game loving idiot that I am, I didn't see a package to dnload from those bugzilla entries, where is it? I'd be glad to share your toys and give them a test run! Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 20 07:31:13 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:31:13 +0200 Subject: xmoto Review In-Reply-To: <1153357307.9350.52.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> References: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> <200607190431.52766.hugo@devin.com.br> <1153357307.9350.52.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> Message-ID: <44BF3141.7080205@hhs.nl> Ric Moore wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 04:31 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in >>>> FE? The link for the review is in: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'll review your ode using game if you'll review mine, deal? : >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 > Game loving idiot that I am, I didn't see a package to dnload from those > bugzilla entries, where is it? I'd be glad to share your toys and give > them a test run! Ric > During review there are only SRPM's which contain the source code and detailed info on howto build an rpm for it. Download the linked SRPM and then do: rpmbuild --rebuild bla.src.rpm This should give you normal rpm(s) to install Regards, Hans From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Thu Jul 20 21:01:42 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:01:42 +0200 Subject: The ClanLib saga Message-ID: <44BFEF36.9000703@hhs.nl> Hi all, The past 2 full days I've been busy packaging ClanLib which is a pingus (lemmings inspired game) dependency. The last released (ancient) pingus only compiles against ClanLib-0.6, but the current much more newer svn-trunk requires 0.8 . I first tried porting the last release to 0.8 (bad idea) took me hours to get 26 of 260 cpp files ported. Then I found out many other ClanLib using games are all written for 0.6 So I ended up packaging them both in a parallel installable way. So now I have a ClanLib and a ClanLib06 package. Tomorrow I'll start working on pingus (from the FE wishlist), clanbomber and auriferous* (loderunner inspired game) packages. Notice the smallish HACK to the pkg-config files to stop ClanLib (0.8) from conflicting with ClanLib06. It might be best to review these 2 together, if anyone feels like it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199630 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199632 Regards, Hans *) If you want to check this game out, don't wait for my package its _full_ of bugs, but I've got most nailed now. From wayward4now at gmail.com Fri Jul 21 04:25:16 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:25:16 -0400 Subject: xmoto Review and a question to the group. In-Reply-To: <44BF3141.7080205@hhs.nl> References: <200607181349.46223.hugo@devin.com.br> <44BD47E6.5070002@hhs.nl> <200607190431.52766.hugo@devin.com.br> <1153357307.9350.52.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> <44BF3141.7080205@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <1153455916.22277.22.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 09:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Ric Moore wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 04:31 -0300, Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > >> On Tuesday 18 July 2006 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> Hugo Cisneiros wrote: > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> Can anyone review the xmoto package for me, now that ode is included in > >>>> FE? The link for the review is in: > >>>> > >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'll review your ode using game if you'll review mine, deal? : > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 > > Game loving idiot that I am, I didn't see a package to dnload from those > > bugzilla entries, where is it? I'd be glad to share your toys and give > > them a test run! Ric > > > > During review there are only SRPM's which contain the source code and > detailed info on howto build an rpm for it. Download the linked SRPM and > then do: > rpmbuild --rebuild bla.src.rpm OK! Both Xmoto and sturmbahnfahrer built easily, after installed the depends. Both ran well, although either would take some time to master. Nice graphics and the controls were pretty much universal once I figured out more-than and greater than (<>) for sturmbahnfahrer. I have a question... does anyone on this list no of a good 2D role playing game, with a fairly easy to use editor that would run on the $100 laptop? I have a sourceforge project that needs a non-complex game with an editor. It's the editor I'm most interested in, it has to be easy enough for inmates to use in correctional facilities. Gotta have the source code to be patched to allow streaming video, triggered by game events and localities. Anyone know of such?? Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 20:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197734] Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212037.k6LKbx6V030550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmoto - Challenging 2D Motocross Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197734 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 16:29 EST ------- Package imported and built! Closing. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:00:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212100.k6LL016s032498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 16:50 EST ------- Now onto a formal re-review :-) Thanks to the other guys for submitting comments and reviewing it too! MUST OK: * rpmlint gives no warnings * Packaging is named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename ok and package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 21 21:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607212123.k6LLNXYj002131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |hugo at devin.com.br OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-07-21 17:14 EST ------- (Sorry about the last comment, access keys sometimes are annoying) Now onto a formal re-review :-) Thanks to the other guys for submitting comments and reviewing it too! MUST OK: * rpmlint gives no warnings * Packaging is named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename ok and package follows Packaging Guidelines * Package is licensed under GPL, license file included * Specfile in English and legible * Tarball in packages matches with upstream's checksum: 25d8907b234c9ebaa91c590c6fcbf9ba sturmbahnfahrer-1.1.tar.gz * Package builds fine * BuildRequires are fine * Package does not contain locale files * Package does not contain shared libraries * Package does not own other packages' directories * All files in %files are listed fine and not duplicated * Permissions on the specfile are fine * Clean section is used in the right way * Macros are used consistently * No need for a -doc sub-package * No need for development package * Package does not contain libtool archives * Package installs desktop file and icon SHOULD OK: * Package builds fine in mock * Package runs fine I see no blockers at all, package approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 22 05:01:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199310] Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200607220501.k6M51IfN020464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sturmbahnfahrer - Simulated obstacle course for automobiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-07-22 00:52 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wayward4now at gmail.com Mon Jul 31 15:01:38 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:01:38 -0400 Subject: Didn't know if this made the trip Message-ID: <1154358098.9173.20.camel@iam.wayward4now.net> I've been having issues with gmail which are hopefully now resolved. I posted previously asking if anyone here knew of a good 2D graphical adventure game that had a really good editor. Gotta have that editor and hopefully it will be relatively easy to use. Open Source, of course. It's for a prison rehab project so there are about 1.7 million potential users for it. Someone will get their name up in lights! I already have one developer slaving away at this, and it's the graphics that is proving problematic. I figure it might be easier to just take a working game, and make the modifications to it, everyone getting credit for it. I'd like to have the game call up streaming videos at points and situations in the game. If anyone can direct me, I'd appreciate it!! Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================