From wayward4now at gmail.com Fri Sep 1 02:42:39 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:42:39 -0400 Subject: Looking for maintainers In-Reply-To: <44F67DBF.6080103@hhs.nl> References: <44F4B968.1010400@kobold.org> <1157003519.2572.187.camel@wayward4now.net> <44F67DBF.6080103@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <1157078559.17364.108.camel@wayward4now.net> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 08:12 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Ric Moore wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:02 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > >> I've been sitting on a handful of games packaged that I can't commit to > >> maintaining as I've already got too many things to maintain right now. > >> Feel free to take any of these and submit them for review: > >> warzone 2100: > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/warzone-2.0.3-1.src.rpm > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/warzone.spec > >> > >> flobopuyo and vavoom have been tested and should run ok. I haven't > >> installed or run the warzone packages yet. > > > > > > error: Failed build dependencies: > > freealut-devel is needed by warzone-2.0.3-1.i386 > > physfs-devel is needed by warzone-2.0.3-1.i386 > > > > got this when I tried to rpmbuild it > > > > > > Then you should install them :) > yum -y instakk freealut-devel physfs-devel rpmbuild grumbled a bit, during the compile, but it plays great!! What do I do now? To whom do I report? Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From wayward4now at gmail.com Fri Sep 1 02:48:50 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:48:50 -0400 Subject: warzone... aw shucks Message-ID: <1157078930.17364.117.camel@wayward4now.net> I had about 30 tanks, 5 guardtowers and was just starting to kick level II butts, when the game just whooshed to the start screen!! Tried the tutorial and that just blew the game out of the water, there one moment, gone the next. Something is amiss. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From wayward4now at gmail.com Fri Sep 1 02:52:53 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:52:53 -0400 Subject: warzone revisited Message-ID: <1157079173.17364.121.camel@wayward4now.net> warzone2100: /usr/bin/../lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by warzone2100) error: eventFireCallbackTrigger: script interpreter is already running error: Assert in Warzone: event.c:977 : eventFireCallbackTrigger (FALSE) error: script parse error: 'syntax error' at tutorial3.slo:247 Token: 308, Text: 'researchCompleted' Aborted This is the error message on the terminal window for Warzone crapping out in tutorial. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From wayward4now at gmail.com Sat Sep 2 02:16:56 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:16:56 -0400 Subject: Looking for maintainers In-Reply-To: <44F4B968.1010400@kobold.org> References: <44F4B968.1010400@kobold.org> Message-ID: <1157163417.17364.166.camel@wayward4now.net> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:02 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > I've been sitting on a handful of games packaged that I can't commit to > maintaining as I've already got too many things to maintain right now. > Feel free to take any of these and submit them for review: > vavoom: > http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-1.21.2-1.src.rpm > http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom.spec > http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl-1.20-1.src.rpm > http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl.spec > Vavoom compiled but wouldn't run. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From wart at kobold.org Sat Sep 2 02:43:38 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:43:38 -0700 Subject: Looking for maintainers In-Reply-To: <1157163417.17364.166.camel@wayward4now.net> References: <44F4B968.1010400@kobold.org> <1157163417.17364.166.camel@wayward4now.net> Message-ID: <44F8EFDA.40903@kobold.org> Ric Moore wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:02 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: >> I've been sitting on a handful of games packaged that I can't commit to >> maintaining as I've already got too many things to maintain right now. >> Feel free to take any of these and submit them for review: > >> vavoom: >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-1.21.2-1.src.rpm >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom.spec >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl-1.20-1.src.rpm >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl.spec >> > Vavoom compiled but wouldn't run. Ric What kind of error did you get when you tried to run it? Which Fedora release was this on? i386 or x86_64? --Wart From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022059.k82Kxl1D000404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:59 EST ------- It's been almost a week, and I have seen no sign of objection on the fedora- games-list (from looking at the archives at least). I would expect someone would have spoken up by now if there were objections... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030534.k835Yhbb013443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-03 01:34 EST ------- Thanks all, Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:03:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041503.k84F3mWP008885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-04 11:03 EST ------- I've made a new version whcih properly includes the copyright exception removal which makes this distributable: * Mon Sep 4 2006 Hans de Goede 1.1.0-2 - Add fedora-copyright.txt to %doc, which explains and contains the lifting of the shaderlab license exception, which makes this package distributable by Fedora Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-1.1.0-2.src.rpm For the copyright exception text see: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-copyright.txt Can someone please review this now? Several people have requested this package from me and now its done nobody wants to review it, thats kinda frustrating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:13:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041513.k84FDFeK009310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:55:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041555.k84FtCEI010987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-04 11:55 EST ------- Preliminary comments : This notice seems like a leftover from a copy/paste of the main spec file : # this is basicly # http://dl.sourceforge.net/tremulous/tremulous-%{version}.zip # repackaged with tremulous-%{version}-src.tar.gz removed as that contains # non Free software (the lcc compiler). - Why do you hardcode the name and more importantly the version in the Source0 line? This can lead to the typical case where you increase the "Verrsion:" line but forget the Source0 one and the resulting package seems to be the new version when it's still the old ;-) Some people prefer like that, but in the main tremulous package you use %{version}. - The cp %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt should be replaced by "install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt" since a wrong umask could lead to a world writeable file, like it has already happened in the Extras build system... - I'd suggest removing the %{?dist} from the release since this data can and should be shared across all releases (i.e. packages copied as-is for FC-5 and FC-6). - The %description should end with a dot :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 06:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 02:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050616.k856G8c6011719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-05 02:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Preliminary comments : > > This notice seems like a leftover from a copy/paste of the main spec file : > # this is basicly > # http://dl.sourceforge.net/tremulous/tremulous-%{version}.zip > # repackaged with tremulous-%{version}-src.tar.gz removed as that contains > # non Free software (the lcc compiler). > Nope, in tremolous.spec it says: # this is %{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz as containted in: # http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.zip # with the src/tools/lcc dir removed as that contains non Free software Notice the subtile difference, which makes each explain prettty exact what the tarbal is and how it was created. > - Why do you hardcode the name and more importantly the version in the Source0 > line? This can lead to the typical case where you increase the "Verrsion:" line > but forget the Source0 one and the resulting package seems to be the new version > when it's still the old ;-) Some people prefer like that, but in the main > tremulous package you use %{version}. I dunno why I did that, fixed. > - The cp %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt should be replaced by "install -p -m > 0644 %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt" since a wrong umask could lead to a world > writeable file, like it has already happened in the Extras build system... Fixed > - I'd suggest removing the %{?dist} from the release since this data can and > should be shared across all releases (i.e. packages copied as-is for FC-5 and FC-6). > - The %description should end with a dot :-) Good point, done. Here is a new spec file, I didn't upload a new SRPM as that is huge: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050933.k859Xcjg024245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-05 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Nope, in tremolous.spec it says: > # this is %{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz as containted in: > # http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.zip > # with the src/tools/lcc dir removed as that contains non Free software > > Notice the subtile difference, which makes each explain prettty exact what the > tarbal is and how it was created. Sorry, I got confused. I see what you mean now. I still don't see any dot at the end of the %description :-) Anyway, here we go for the formal review. - License is CC Attribution-ShareAlike, which falls into the "binary firmware" exception, since it is redistribuable and doesn't have any commercial use restrictions, good - rpmlint complains only about the License, good - Spec file seems fine, three minor nitpicks : - The Source1 "tremulous-copyright.txt" gets installed as "fedora-copyright.txt", why two different names? - Maybe you should uncomment the %build line, even though the section is empty, since IIRC not having %build has already caused weird things to happen. - It's "basically", not "basicly". - Builds and runs (with the main tremulous of course) fine, good Most other MUST/SHOULD don't apply, so for me the package is APPROVED. Don't forget to build it only for a single distro and request the packages to be copied over in order to save space on mirror server (hardlinks) and during upgrades. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 19:09:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051909.k85J9TcI013159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-05 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > - Spec file seems fine, three minor nitpicks : > - The Source1 "tremulous-copyright.txt" gets installed as > "fedora-copyright.txt", why two different names? The name starting with tremulous is to make clear to which package it belongs when the src rpm gets installed and the files dropped under /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES Since under /usr/share/doc it already is in a tremulous dir the trmulous in the name isn't needed and since the file is added to meet the fedora copyright guidelines I call it fedora-copyright.txt . > - Maybe you should uncomment the %build line, even though the section is > empty, since IIRC not having %build has already caused weird things to > happen. I actually commented it because in another review of a similar data only package the reviewer wanted it commented, so I'm leaving it as is as this seems to work fine for the other package. > - It's "basically", not "basicly". Fixed I'm importing it now (slow slow lookaside cache upload, at times like the the A in ADSL sucks). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:35:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060635.k866Zu7q024756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-06 02:35 EST ------- Thanks BTW! Imported and Build, Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wayward4now at gmail.com Sat Sep 9 04:58:33 2006 From: wayward4now at gmail.com (Ric Moore) Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 00:58:33 -0400 Subject: Looking for maintainers In-Reply-To: <44F8EFDA.40903@kobold.org> References: <44F4B968.1010400@kobold.org> <1157163417.17364.166.camel@wayward4now.net> <44F8EFDA.40903@kobold.org> Message-ID: <1157777913.27108.0.camel@wayward4now.net> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 19:43 -0700, Wart wrote: > Ric Moore wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:02 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > >> I've been sitting on a handful of games packaged that I can't commit to > >> maintaining as I've already got too many things to maintain right now. > >> Feel free to take any of these and submit them for review: > > > >> vavoom: > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-1.21.2-1.src.rpm > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom.spec > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl-1.20-1.src.rpm > >> http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/queue/vavoom-vmdl.spec > >> > > Vavoom compiled but wouldn't run. Ric > > What kind of error did you get when you tried to run it? Which Fedora > release was this on? i386 or x86_64? here's the dump, using FC5 i386 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Game mode indeterminate. *** glibc detected *** vavoom: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x09f24a78 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_free+0x179)[0xc594f0] vavoom[0x814b1c2] vavoom[0x80f2a32] vavoom[0x805f56a] /lib/libc.so.6(exit+0xe6)[0xc1c98e] vavoom[0x8167249] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0xc07724] vavoom(__gxx_personality_v0+0x149)[0x804d8b1] ======= Memory map: ======== 00111000-00114000 rwxp 00111000 00:00 0 00114000-0020d000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39483578 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 0020d000-00211000 rwxp 000f9000 fd:00 39483578 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 00211000-00214000 rwxp 00211000 00:00 0 00214000-00216000 rwxp 00000000 00:0f 1040 /dev/zero 002b2000-002b3000 rwxp 002b2000 00:00 0 002ed000-002f8000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872041 /lib/libgcc_s-4.1.1-20060525.so.1 002f8000-002f9000 rwxp 0000a000 fd:00 24872041 /lib/libgcc_s-4.1.1-20060525.so.1 00343000-00344000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 41618941 /usr/lib/nvidia/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1.0.8762 00344000-00345000 rwxp 00000000 fd:00 41618941 /usr/lib/nvidia/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1.0.8762 00396000-003cb000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39482189 /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7.0.0 003cb000-003cc000 rwxp 00035000 fd:00 39482189 /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7.0.0 003ed000-0040b000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39456281 /usr/lib/libFLAC ++.so.5.0.0 0040b000-0040c000 rwxp 0001e000 fd:00 39456281 /usr/lib/libFLAC ++.so.5.0.0 0046b000-00487000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39484871 /usr/lib/libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0.2.4 00487000-00490000 rwxp 0001c000 fd:00 39484871 /usr/lib/libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0.2.4 00490000-004b3000 rwxp 00490000 00:00 0 004b5000-00500000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39484870 /usr/lib/libmikmod.so.2.0.4 00500000-00502000 rwxp 0004b000 fd:00 39484870 /usr/lib/libmikmod.so.2.0.4 005f3000-005f4000 rwxp 005f3000 00:00 0 0062f000-0066a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39484925 /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.0 0066a000-0066b000 rwxp 0003b000 fd:00 39484925 /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.0 0066b000-0066f000 rwxp 0066b000 00:00 0 00734000-007a8000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 41619050 /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.0.8762 007a8000-007c1000 rwxp 00074000 fd:00 41619050 /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.0.8762 007c1000-007c3000 rwxp 007c1000 00:00 0 00876000-0087e000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39483579 /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0 0087e000-0087f000 rwxp 00007000 fd:00 39483579 /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0 00881000-00885000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39483586 /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.0.0 00885000-00886000 rwxp 00003000 fd:00 39483586 /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.0.0 00893000-0089c000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39483587 /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 0089c000-0089d000 rwxp 00008000 fd:00 39483587 /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1.0.2 00bd4000-00bd5000 r-xp 00bd4000 00:00 0 [vdso] 00bd5000-00bee000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872036 /lib/ld-2.4.so 00bee000-00bef000 r-xp 00018000 fd:00 24872036 /lib/ld-2.4.so 00bef000-00bf0000 rwxp 00019000 fd:00 24872036 /lib/ld-2.4.so 00bf2000-00d1f000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872037 /lib/libc-2.4.so 00d1f000-00d21000 r-xp 0012d000 fd:00 24872037 /lib/libc-2.4.so 00d21000-00d22000 rwxp 0012f000 fd:00 24872037 /lib/libc-2.4.so 00d22000-00d25000 rwxp 00d22000 00:00 0 00d27000-00d4a000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872038 /lib/libm-2.4.so 00d4a000-00d4b000 r-xp 00022000 fd:00 24872038 /lib/libm-2.4.so 00d4b000-00d4c000 rwxp 00023000 fd:00 24872038 /lib/libm-2.4.so 00d4e000-00d50000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872039 /lib/libdl-2.4.so 00d50000-00d51000 r-xp 00001000 fd:00 24872039 /lib/libdl-2.4.so 00d51000-00d52000 rwxp 00002000 fd:00 24872039 /lib/libdl-2.4.so 00d54000-00d66000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39481354 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 00d66000-00d67000 rwxp 00011000 fd:00 39481354 /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 00d69000-00d6e000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39481351 /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 00d6e000-00d6f000 rwxp 00004000 fd:00 39481351 /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 00d71000-00d73000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39481350 /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 00d73000-00d74000 rwxp 00001000 fd:00 39481350 /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 00d76000-00d85000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39483582 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6.4.0 00d85000-00d86000 rwxp 0000e000 fd:00 39483582 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6.4.0 00d88000-00d98000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 24872047 /lib/libpthread-2.4.so 00d98000-00d99000 r-xp 0000f000 fd:00 24872047 /lib/libpthread-2.4.so 00d99000-00d9a000 rwxp 00010000 fd:00 24872047 /lib/libpthread-2.4.so 00d9a000-00d9c000 rwxp 00d9a000 00:00 0 00d9e000-00dc5000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39481355 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00dc5000-00dc6000 rwxp 00026000 fd:00 39481355 /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8 00eea000-00f4b000 rwxp 00eea000 00:00 0 02ab2000-03295000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 41618940 /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.so.1.0.8762 03295000-032c5000 rwxp 007e2000 fd:00 41618940 /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.so.1.0.8762 032c5000-032c9000 rwxp 032c5000 00:00 0 03781000-03796000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39482086 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 03796000-03797000 rwxp 00015000 fd:00 39482086 /usr/lib/libmad.so.0.2.1 03e40000-03e45000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39482609 /usr/lib/libogg.so.0.5.3 03e45000-03e46000 rwxp 00004000 fd:00 39482609 /usr/lib/libogg.so.0.5.3 03e48000-03e64000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39482610 /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0.3.1 03e64000-03e72000 rwxp 0001c000 fd:00 39482610 /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0.3.1 03e74000-03e7b000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39482616 /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3.1.1 03e7b000-03e7c000 rwxp 00006000 fd:00 39482616 /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3.1.1 05140000-05222000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39481371 /usr/lib/libstdc ++.so.6.0.8 05222000-05226000 r-xp 000e1000 fd:00 39481371 /usr/lib/libstdc ++.so.6.0.8 05226000-05227000 rwxp 000e5000 fd:00 39481371 /usr/lib/libstdc ++.so.6.0.8 05227000-0522d000 rwxp 05227000 00:00 0 07e25000-07e96000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39476059 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2 07e96000-07e99000 rwxp 00070000 fd:00 39476059 /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.7.2 07e99000-07eb4000 rwxp 07e99000 00:00 0 08048000-081cc000 r-xp 00000000 fd:00 39468103 /usr/bin/vavoom 081cc000-081de000 rwxp 00184000 fd:00 39468103 /usr/bin/vavoom 081de000-082bb000 rwxp 081de000 00:00 0 09eff000-09f41000 rwxp 09eff000 00:00 0 [heap] bfd66000-bfd7c000 rwxp bfd66000 00:00 0 [stack] Segmentation fault -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ...the Sin of Ignorance, and ...the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================ From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Fri Sep 15 07:00:58 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:00:58 +0200 Subject: [Fwd: Re: Freedoom] Message-ID: <450A4FAA.9030503@hhs.nl> Hi all, I long long time ago I send a message to the freedoom maintainer with some ideas and an offer to help. I thought the message got ignored, but it actually got filed under to be answered later, so a few days ago I got this answered, I'm currently a bit swamped with work from a new job, but if anyone else here wants to help them out that would be great! Regards, Hans -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Freedoom Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:03:21 +0100 From: Jon Dowland To: Hans de Goede CC: fraggle at soulsphere.org References: <4434E94F.6060905 at hhs.nl> Hi: sorry for such a long delay in replying :( I've intended to for a while, but more recently, I've spent every spare moment on doom stuff on freedoom 0.5. At 1144325487 past the epoch, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > First a short intro. I'm a Linux enthousiast / programmer > and a packager for Fedora Extras which is an online > community that packages software in the native package > format for Fedora Core a (well known) Linux distribution. > > I'm also a member of our Games Special Interest Group: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games Cool: I'm a member of the "debian games group"[1], which I guess is the counterpart to your group :) It might be that there is quite a lot the groups could work together on... One thing that 0.5 brings you might be interested in is a proper release of our build system. > And as such I've been involved in the packaging of > freedoom for Fedora, together with one other Fedora > Packager: Michael First of all great > work on freedoom! Thanks :) > We've been thinking a bit about freedoom and about > packaging aditional levels (pwads) which then use freedoom > as iwad, and we though that maybe we could do something to > help you (I'm a coder not a artist or level designer!). > > For example Michael found this nice levels called marswad > and we've had some discussion with their author: For the > pwad see: http://toastytech.com/doom/ We can always use more help with resources. You can see the current status of our project[2] (well, you could if the website wasn't broken) which indicates we definitely need more levels. Most PWADs however have a licence which is not compatible with ours[3]. For example: > although I usually ask that I am credited or linked back > to. That is a restriction beyond what our licence stipulates :( I see below however that you are aware of this. > So basicly with a few buts these levels are free, no I > don't no much / anything about this stuff so this might be > stupid, but wouldn't it be an idea to use these levels to > extend freedoom? It's a possibility. As I write this I haven't looked at the marswar levels for a while. They might have to be chopped up to fit into freedoom, so levels at the beginning looked like the others around it and weren't too long/difficult, etc. In general however, the ideal freedoom level right now is in a finished, but unpolished state. The level will be tweaked, re-arranged and possibly re-themed by other people (like a true open source code project is). Most PWADs already released are in a "final" state that doesn't lend well to future manipulation. > More in general wouldn't it be a good idea to use textures > / monsters / etc from the huge amount of non ID doom stuff > out there? * The vast majority of it is of a dubious copyright or licence unfortunately :( We have used donated resources in a few cases: the demon was briefly a skeleton from "Army of Darkness Doom"; then it was a recoloured Slimer sprite from a Ghostbusters mod. More generic things (like weapons) have been donated from a number of TCs. > As said I'm not an artist/level designer, but I do have > (ever growing) experience in asking and if needed > massaging people into setting their IP free , as in > releasing it onder a freesoftware / opensource license. that's always useful. Actually, as a side-note, there's an ongoing community effort to get the Heretic/Hexen source opened up. We're treading carefully here, but you might find interesting - sorry about the pop-ups :( > Another thing I / we could do to help you is pass along > any practical help requests to the Fedora Community where > there are Artists who might be willing to help. We could > for example write a piece about freedoom and about the > still needed bits in our Weekly Magazine. Some kind of promotion piece might be useful. It could be coordinated along side some stuff at our end and maybe in other communities, too. I'm sort-of taking a short break since getting 0.5 out before resuming work on freedoom. When I do, I'm going to draw up a plan for 0.6, which I want out in much shorter a time frame from 0.5 (which was 9 months). Maybe keep bugging us :) Or, try to catch us in #doom-tech on oftc, or possibly post some stuff on our doomworld-hosted forum, and see what others come up with too. But thanks for your interest, work, and for getting in touch. > * One of the particular problems with freedoom seems to be > a lack of a couple of monsters. The alien TC has many new > monsters if you want I can try to get a free license for > those for use in freedoom, I know that as is the alien TC > has other issues besides the license because it well erm > uses to some extend ideas / IP from a well known movie, > but I believe that if we just use (a few of) the monsters > without the rest of the alien theme we are pretty safe > (IANAL). You will have quite a lot of difficulty tracking down Justin Fischer imho - I could be wrong but I think he doesn't like being contacted about Aliens TC anymore. The Quake Aliens TC was hit by a cease-and-decist so it would be quite a hot potato. In the specific case of the demon, we've just put a worm-style sprite in for 0.5 which I think really rocks - what do you think? [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Games/ [2] http://freedoom.sourceforge.net/contributors/status/ [3] http://freedoom.sourceforge.net/deutex/COPYING -- Jon Dowland http://alcopop.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wart at kobold.org Tue Sep 19 19:10:04 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:10:04 -0700 Subject: [Fwd: Re: Freedoom] In-Reply-To: <450A4FAA.9030503@hhs.nl> References: <450A4FAA.9030503@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <4510408C.4080804@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > I long long time ago I send a message to the freedoom maintainer with > some ideas and an offer to help. I thought the message got ignored, but > it actually got filed under to be answered later, so a few days ago I > got this answered, I'm currently a bit swamped with work from a new job, > but if anyone else here wants to help them out that would be great! On a related note, I noticed that freedoom 0.5.0 has been released, which now comes with some deathmatch levels. I've already updated freedoom for FC6 and submitted the deathmatch levels for review (BZ #206816). --Wart -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From wart at kobold.org Tue Sep 19 19:22:47 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:22:47 -0700 Subject: guichan update? Message-ID: <45104387.7000007@kobold.org> manaworld 0.0.21 was recently released, and is a necessary upgrade as the single server instance has also been upgraded and will no longer work with the 0.0.20 client. One of the changes in this release is a requirement on guichan 0.5.0. The current version in both FC5 and FC6 is 0.4.0, which won't work. The only other package that I've found that depends on guichan is one that I've submitted for review (sear, #198839). Does anyone know of any other packages that depend on guichan or any other reason that we couldn't upgrade it to 0.5.0? --Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Wed Sep 20 11:37:40 2006 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:37:40 +0200 Subject: txukart -> supertuxkart, new package? Message-ID: <45112804.1000307@hhs.nl> Hi, A group of developers has recently picked up tuxkart and called the resulting improved version supertuxkart. As such I would like to upgrade the tuxkart currently in FE to their supertuxkart version. Now the easiest way todo this is to just leave it called tuxkart and drop in the new sources (and adjust patches, etc, bla). This has 2 disadvantages though: 1) people explicitly seeking for supertuxkart will not find it 2) I need to be creative with the version no (no big problem there) My main concern is 1) which makes one wish we had package aliases :) I could partially fix 1 by providing supertuxkart, so that yum install supertuxkart will work. But that won't fix yum list. The alternative is to submit a new supertuxkart package which obsoletes tuxkart, question will this cause automatic upgrades of tuxkart to supertuxkart? Anyways I'm not sure which path is the best to follow, hence this mail. Regards, Hans From wart at kobold.org Fri Sep 29 18:01:39 2006 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:01:39 -0700 Subject: Vacation Message-ID: <451D5F83.1090609@kobold.org> I'll be on vacation from Oct. 3 - 13, and won't be able to respond to bug reports or review comments for any of my packages during this time. Games SIG members should feel free to respond to bugs on any of my game-related packages while I'm gone. I've also updated the Vacation wiki page. --Wart -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3820 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: