From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030307.m8337fQT009321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #10 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-02 23:07:39 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-X11-1.4.2-1.fc9.src.rpm This makes it compliant with the guidelines. This is an example of a package that dynamicaly links to C libraries and is only a library. The macros needed are currently available on the wiki and need to be installed manually for now. There is a bug to have them included in ghc directly. I will add it to the blockers. Don't forget to --copyin them to mock, and then use --no-clean to do the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030311.m833BPsE016258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030311.m833BQaX016286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030310.m833AJE3009776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-02 23:10:18 EDT --- I apologize, that's the wrong package. Here are the correct links. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad-0.7-3.fc9.src.rpm This is an example of a binary and library package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030313.m833Dgww010105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #16 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-02 23:13:40 EDT --- SPEC http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-X11.spec SRPM http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-X11-1.4.2-1.fc9.src.rpm This is an example of a library only package with links to C libraries. The macros needed are currently available on the wiki and need to be installed manually for now. There is a bug to have them included in ghc directly. I will add it to the blockers. Don't forget to --copyin them to mock, and then use --no-clean to do the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030314.m833EO1S016575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030312.m833CaJl016468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030312.m833Ca5V016448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030314.m833ENEb016555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030312.m833CAXB016401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-02 23:12:09 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.7-2.fc9.src.rpm This is a second example of a library only package. The macros needed are currently available on the wiki and need to be installed manually for now. There is a bug to have them included in ghc directly. I will add it to the blockers. Don't forget to --copyin them to mock, and then use --no-clean to do the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 03:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809030316.m833GNKl010695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 3 22:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 18:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809032204.m83M43c0001300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 03:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 23:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809040319.m843Jq34030540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-09-03 23:19:52 EDT --- Will review tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 09:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809040900.m8490mEm007247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 05:00:48 EDT --- As I already mentioned in comment 14 and elsewhere, the ghc_gen_filelists macro is broken and needs to be fixed (even though the macros were already accepted by the packaging committee;). At the same time I think it might be worth doing some slight simplication of the macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 09:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809040905.m84959iG008182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 05:05:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315727) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315727) ghc-X11.spec+macros eg this spec file with embedded macros from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell/GHCMacroDefs gives: + pushd /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/ghc-X11-1.4.2-1.fc10.i386 + echo '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' + find ./usr/lib/ghc-6.8.3/X11-1.4.2 '(' -name '*_p.a' -o -name '*.p_hi' ')' + sed 's/^.//' + echo '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' + find ./usr/lib/ghc-6.8.3/X11-1.4.2 -type d + sed 's/^./%dir /' + find ./usr/lib/ghc-6.8.3/X11-1.4.2 '!' '(' -type d -o -name '*_p.a' -o -name '*.p_hi' ')' + sed 's/^.//' + sed 's,^/,%exclude /,' '%{ghc_tar_dir}/ghc-X11-files.prof' sed: can't read %{ghc_tar_dir}/ghc-X11-files.prof: No such file or directory RPM build error: Error: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zA1wEN ??????????? (%install) /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zA1wEN ??????????? (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 11:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809041100.m84B0T5j009780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 07:00:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315734) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315734) ghc-X11.spec+macros-revised I would really like to suggest that we do the macros and packaging in this way. This is a lightly cleaned up and simplified set of packages, which I would be happy to go ahead with. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 11:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809041105.m84B52Ug032322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 07:05:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315737) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315737) macros.haskell I would to propose these as a slightly revised and improved set of macros. They have been tested with a ghc-X11.spec in bug 426751. Please give them a try and see what you think. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 17:38:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809041738.m84Hc4Ud030399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-04 13:38:03 EDT --- These macros present a few problems. They only work for our default compiler, and furthermore, when a user changes the default compiler, could introduce some weird breakage in mock when he/she forgets that it uses two different compilers. There has been some demand for macros that work cross platform and build multiple packages for multiple compilers. I'm going to have a look at a better way to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 19:47:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809041947.m84Jlbbg021624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #4 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-04 15:47:37 EDT --- I'd really rather we didn't spend much more time haggling over the macros. Both Jens's and Yaakov's macros are good enough. For the foreseeable future, we should not care about supporting multiple compilers, because everybody uses GHC. If some crowd of users comes along who desperately wants hugs support, I would prefer that we consider their needs then, rather than adding further delay and contention now. Unless there's a strong reason not to, I will commit Yaakov's existing macros file in a day or two. I intend to do this only for ghc 6.8.3 in rawhide, unless someone thinks we should backport 6.8.3 to F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 4 22:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 18:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809042237.m84MbMPR012614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-04 18:37:22 EDT --- In that case, we'll need to make a few modifications. 1) the macros should be prefixed with ghc, not cabal or haskell 2) library packages should be prefixed with ghc-, not haskell- The reasoning is that if someone asks for nhc support, i would rather just have them do their own nhc packages in a similar manner. It seems the easiest for now, rather than having to rename haskell-* packages to ghc-* later. Also, I would like to ask that you backport the macros to everything, because they are definitely needed in order to build packages. Otherwise, there is no way we can build stuff on Koji boxes running on Fedora 9 or other versions. To put this in perspective, the current workflow is to clean out mock, then copyin the macros. This is not doable with Koji. It's a pain in the you know what for most users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 00:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050001.m8501wH0028357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Miles Sabin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |miles at milessabin.com --- Comment #6 from Miles Sabin 2008-09-04 20:01:57 EDT --- I'd like to echo Bryan's comment that we should stop haggling and get on with this. Rather than dragging this on interminably I think it would be vastly preferable to get a few packages built and worry about minor tweaks later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 00:24:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050024.m850OwUx008930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 20:24:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > These macros present a few problems. They only work for our default compiler, Can you explain? As far as I can see they should be useful for any Haskell implementation that support Cabal. They look completely portable to be, as cabal indeed should be. > and furthermore, when a user changes the default compiler, could introduce some > weird breakage in mock when he/she forgets that it uses two different > compilers. details? As others suggested I would like to see these macros get included in rpm eventually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 00:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050031.m850VDm0010399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-04 20:31:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'd like to echo Bryan's comment that we should stop haggling and get on with this. We're not haggling - just trying to come up with a same set of macros that is actually useful. I think mine are a good improvement on Yaakov's original proposal and would like to see them or something close to them adopted. > Rather than dragging this on interminably I think it would be vastly > preferable to get a few packages built and worry about minor tweaks later. I disagree: I would rather get a decent of macros in place now than having to update lots of packages later to take in modifications. As a person who actually owns some haskell packages in fedora and who started Haskell packaging for Fedora and the Haskell SIG I hope my suggestions at least carry a little weight... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 01:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050106.m8516AMB016733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #9 from Miles Sabin 2008-09-04 21:06:10 EDT --- A couple of dozen "good enough" packages would be preferable to zero perfect ones. I was under the impression that Yaakov's macros had already been approved. Bryan also supports them, so do I, so can we just move on now please ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 01:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050115.m851FnYr009112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-04 21:15:48 EDT --- I'm willing to give this a few more days to settle out, but Miles is right, time is of the essence. See below. Re comment #5: > 1) the macros should be prefixed with ghc, not cabal or haskell GHC-specific macros should be prefixed with ghc. Many of the macros provided by both of you are not specific to GHC. > 2) library packages should be prefixed with ghc-, not haskell- I would prefer this approach, too. I do not believe that asking maintainers to support multiple Haskell implementations will scale. > Also, I would like to ask that you backport the macros to everything, because > they are definitely needed in order to build packages. OK. I would like to suggest a deadline of next Thursday (Sep 11) to resolve the two sets of macro files into one. We will have to move quickly afterwards to adapt to the changes in GHC 6.10.1 if we want to ship that in F10 (which I *very* much want to do). Those changes include shared library support, so the amount of work involved will not be trivial. The 6.10.1 release candidate should appear on the 19th, and I will have a little time at ICFP to whip the spec file and macros into shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 01:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050154.m851sm89015844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Tom Moertel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at moertel.com --- Comment #11 from Tom Moertel 2008-09-04 21:54:47 EDT --- I suggest everybody compare Jens's updated ghc-X11 spec (A) with the previous version (B). I scrutinized every change with ediff, and in each case I prefer the updated version. A: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315734 B: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-X11.spec Does anybody see any *technical* problems with Jens's macros? If so, let's get those problems in the open so we can solve them. Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 03:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050311.m853BN1I008303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #12 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-04 23:11:23 EDT --- Perhaps I should have been more specific. Jen's macros call 'runhaskell'. This defaults to the default compiler on any given system. I would prefer we deliberately called runghc. Take the following case. User A installs GHC and develops a package. He posts a spec for review. User B prefers NHC and has it set up as his default compiler. He downloads the SRPM and builds it, which automatically gets built with NHC. He then tests it in mock, and it also works. Mock used GHC. Weird but ok. User C uses Hugs98, and creates a second package. He doesn't test it in mock, because sometimes he's lazy. User B downloads the SRPM and tries to build it. For some odd reason, hugs chokes on it. Weird, and not ok. Then for some reason, the patch User B figures out makes GHC choke. When the package is compiled with mock, we have total failure. This use case rubs against me the wrong way, because we used runhaskell instead of runghc. If we use runghc, then all three users will automatically use GHC, and automatically be working on the same platform. The package will then be named ghc-* because it was tested on that. When User B decides both packages should be done up in NHC, and User C decides hugs98 suits him better, they both copy the macros file, patch the compiler RPMs, and create nhc-* and hugs98-* variants. The world is a happier place. To make it absolutely clear, i'm not worried about the content of the macros. Jen clearly knows what works better than I. I just think, that unless any particular macro does not depend on the command 'runhaskell', namely can do things exactly the same way, no matter which compiler is on the system, then we can prefix it with 'cabal_'. To the best of my knowledge, no macros meet these requirements. Likewise, the prefix 'haskell_' is also wrong. I would rather we stick to a consistent ghc- and ghc_ naming scheme. On a side note, the packages I have submitted for review (the are blocked on this bug, so you can find them through that reference) were built and tested using my version. Please be extra careful when testing them with Jens' version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 03:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050344.m853ieOF004309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #13 from Tom Moertel 2008-09-04 23:44:39 EDT --- Yaakov, thanks for explaining your concerns in detail. In reviewing Jens's spec for ghc-X11, it appears that it avoids your primary concern by passing the "--ghc" flag during the initial Cabal-setup invocation: %build %cabal_configure -p --ghc <= HERE %cabal_makefile %cabal build %cabal haddock %ghc_gen_scripts According to the Cabal documentation, this flag ensures that Cabal will use GHC for the later stages of Cabal processing, regardless of which Haskell implementation runhaskell invokes. (Ref: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/Cabal/builders.html#setup-configure) So even if runhaskell invoked NHC, for example, Jens's spec would still build a GHC package. Do you think using Cabal-setup flags to specify the desired compiler will adequately resolve your concern about hidden compiler dependencies? Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 05:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 01:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050508.m8558Vfc028755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #315737|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-05 01:08:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315829) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315829) macros.ghc I talked a bit to Yaakov (loupgaroublond) on #fedora-devel and hope we understand each other a bit better now. Here is a slight update which fixes %ghc_gen_filelists (renamed as it is implementation dependent as Yaakov pointed out to me). I hope this can be close to a final version which is acceptable to all parties. I am kind of tempted to remove %cabal_install also since it is pretty trivial, but maybe it is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 09:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 05:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050923.m859NvGu005969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-05 05:23:56 EDT --- I am not sure if %_cabal_makefile is really necessary? eg ghc-X11 seems to build fine without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 09:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 05:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809050922.m859M1TZ028212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-05 05:22:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315852) ghc-X11.spec Here is a slightly revised spec file without the macros embedded using the latest macros I attached to bug 460304 - tested and builds on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 10:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051049.m85AnTSk021762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Rajesh Krishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at krishnan.cc --- Comment #16 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 06:49:28 EDT --- Everyone, The default Yaakov's macros.ghc or Jens' macros.haskell are NOT adequate for building cabal packages that have mixed-case package names. I had to modify those a little bit to get the test package (Cabal-1.4.0.2) working: For the updated macros.ghc that could build a mixed-case cabal package, look at: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/MISC/macros.ghc For the updated macros.haskell that could build a mixed-case cabal package, look at: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/MISC/macros.haskell The files are quite small, so open either of those along with the corresponding original ones in Kompare (or any other favorite diff program you prefer) to note the differences (there are a few 'echo' traces in the file, let me know if they are not needed and I would remove those). For an example of package (with a mixed-case package-name) that builds with this updated macros.ghc file, look at: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-cabal-1.4.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm This is important because there are a lot of cabal based packages in Hackage that have mixed-case package names. I have already mentioned this before on the Fedora Haskell List where I submitted Cabal-1.4.0.2 package for review. I am attaching both here along with this comment. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 10:51:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051051.m85ApfYX012538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #17 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 06:51:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315875) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315875) macros.ghc that is required to build Hackage cabal based packages with mixed-case package names. Place this file in /etc/rpm to build the following example package (that uses this): http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-cabal-1.4.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -Rajesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 11:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051150.m85BoO6A000315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #18 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 07:50:23 EDT --- Here is another example of a Hackage cabal package that has a completely lowercase package name (polyparse), and builds fine with the updated macros.ghc file I mentioned above: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-polyparse-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-polyparse.spec Note that this was tested on Fedora-8 (x86_64) with Ghc-6.8.3 installed. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 13:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051332.m85DW43I012796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #19 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 09:32:03 EDT --- Here is another problematic Hackage cabal package: Crypto-4.1.0: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/Crypto SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-crypto-4.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-crypto.spec Macros: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/MISC/macros.ghc (tested on F9 + GHC-6.8.3 installed, on x86_64). The problems with this package are: 1. The package has mixed case package name (name starts with a capital letter). 2. The package contains a number of executables (besides a library), but all of those are test executables (not normally executed by end-users). The way I solved these issues are are follows: 1. Mixed case is already taken care of the updated macros.ghc script I have attached. 2. Because the package contains executables, the default package name as per the Fedora Haskell Specification would be crypto-*.rpm and not ghc-crypto-*.rpm. The following are noteworthy for this package: 1. The library package are named ghc-crypto-.fc9..rpm as per the specification because they contain the library and associated library documentation. 2. The profile packages are named ghc-crypto-prof-.fc9..rpm as per the spec. 3. I have an additional devel package called ghc-crypto-devel-.fc9..rpm that contains all the test executables: $ rpm -ql ghc-crypto-devel /usr/bin/HMACTest /usr/bin/QuickTest /usr/bin/RSATest /usr/bin/SHA1Test /usr/bin/SymmetricTest for this case I am violating the current cabal package specification (which are not set in stone I hope) for some (IMHO) good reasons 1. The test executables are not normally required by end-users. 2. The test executables are not normally required by even developers who require compile their code against the library (contained in the main rpm) and would probably never need these executables either. 3. These test executables don't seem to fit into the -prof package either. 4. I thought of dumping these test executables under the libexec folder like (/usr/libexec/ghc-crypto) but for some reason didn't feel that was appropriate. 5. So the only option was to spin-off another package that is named appropriately (-devel). 6. I didn't feel like giving the too-important sounding name "crypto-*.rpm) of a package that contains just a handful of (mostly unnecessarily) test executables. Hence I have named this ghc-crypto-devel-*.rpm (and not crypto-*.rpm or crypto-devel-*.rpm) in order to emphasize its affinity to the actual rpm and source (ghc-crypto*.rpm). Please review the package and let me know if we could do this differently or in any other way. YAAKOV/JENS: If you (mostly) agree with the above logic, then we might need to update the Fedora Haskell Packaging specification as follows: 1. For packages that contain executables that are only related to testing of the package (not something that end users would usually need) the RPM for such a package should be named as ghc-.*.rpm and not simply .*.rpm, assuming its cabal file contains a library section. 2. For packages that contain executables that are related to testing only (and other executables that may not normally be reuqired by end-users), the .SPEC for such an RPM may define a -devel section containing only those test executables. 3. For other packages that contain end-user oriented executables and/or libraries, the general rules defined in the Fedora Haskell Packaging Specification would apply as usual. Feedback is welcome. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 13:44:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051344.m85DiJHi024691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #20 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 09:44:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=315906) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315906) macros.ghc - Removed a bunch of 'echo' trace statements. A minor cleanup of the macros.ghc file I attached earlier. Removed a bunch of unimportant 'echo' statements. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 15:59:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051559.m85Fxkrv020762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #21 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-05 11:59:45 EDT --- Re comment #15: The makefile step is not necessary for correctness, but it makes a big difference to build performance: it lets us build most of a package in parallel using _smp_mflags. Cabal itself won't have the ability to do parallel builds for a long, long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 16:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051609.m85G9crp013216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #22 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-05 12:09:38 EDT --- Re comment #19: Rajesh, if the build for a package is creating test executables that serve no useful purpose, just delete them after cabal installs them. There is no reason we would want to package or ship useless binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 16:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051615.m85GFCX0015470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #23 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-05 12:15:12 EDT --- Rajesh, your macros are substantially different from Jens's current version. Is there anything about Jens's that would cause you problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 16:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809051623.m85GNbxD026854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #24 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-05 12:23:36 EDT --- Rajesh, are any of those executables necessary at all? Are they needed for testing the package itself after being built? Are they necessary for testing packages that depend on them? In any case, I think you should name the spec file 'ghc-crypto.spec' and iclude a comment stating the exception. There's no need to revise the guidelines for something like this. Secondly, if the executables are not needed once the package has been built, note that there is a %test section in the RPM spec that is not often used. Feel free to take advantage of this. If they are needed for dependencies, then just spit out a -devel package, comment why it's needed, and comment on it in the review as well. As for the makefile business, The macros are based on bryan's work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 5 23:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 19:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809052326.m85NQK0s015676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #25 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-05 19:26:19 EDT --- BRYAN: 1. The original set of macros published as part of Jens/Yaakov's updates would not correctly build cabal packages with mixed case package names. The "internal_name" variable is necessary to take care of that. 2. For the argument against deleting the executables after building, see point (2.) in the next section below. YAAKOV: 1. I just compared the macros.ghc you submitted with the one I have and they are identical. Thank you for taking care of my concerns in your updated macros.ghc submission. 2. As for your question about the necessity of the test executables, I have no idea, because I am not the original author of the Crypto cabal package. So in order to avoid ticking-off the very few developers who might actually need those under some special circumstances (the tiniest bit of crypto-related software being too important these days), I did not feel it was appropriate to miss out that detail by simply deleting those executables after compilation. Hence the logical choice of spinning out the -devel package with those executables. 3. As for the %test macro, I think at this time the ghc-crypto rpm spec does not really need that. I felt it would be just easier for me to provide the users of ghc-crypto with the means of testing it for themselves (with the executables in ghc-crypto-devel package). 4. I am building a lot of other cabal packages with our latest macros.ghc and will let everyone know if we need any updates. -Rajesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 07:14:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090714.m897EEDP011226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 03:14:12 EDT --- I agree, if a library creates some test or demo programs then that can be handled case-by-case by package review like any other package. I don't think we need to specify in the guidelines explicitly whether should be be excluded or subpackaged, but one of those two options is likely in general. I think the macros in comment 14 can handle Cabal just fine. I'll attach a spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 07:23:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090723.m897NtqE009606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 03:23:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316151) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316151) ghc-Cabal.spec this builds with attachment 315829 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 07:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090748.m897mYUq016643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 03:48:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316155) ghc-polyparse.spec polyparse is fine too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 07:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090747.m897lWY4016534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 03:47:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316154) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316154) macros.ghc I think to avoid confusion with whitespace it is better to reinstate %cabal_build and %cabal_haddock even though they are trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 08:24:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 04:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090824.m898OuUa020938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 04:24:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316156) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316156) ghc-Crypto.spec Just for good measure and the sake of argument, here is Crypto too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 08:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 04:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809090842.m898gGX1027787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #316154|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 04:42:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316159) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316159) macros.ghc Hopefully a final fix to ghc_gen_filelists. (I am kind of tempted just to drop its argument though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 10:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091024.m89AOMON018070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 06:24:21 EDT --- Should xmonad not require ghc-xmonad? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 11:05:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091105.m89B5MYr022925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 07:05:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316173) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316173) xmonad.spec an updated spec file that builds with the latest macros in bug 460304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 11:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 07:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091108.m89B8nnQ025840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 07:08:48 EDT --- I updated xmonad.spec (see attachment 316173) in the review (bug 426753) too, so that it builds with these macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] New: Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Summary: Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at krishnan.cc QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, loupgaroublond at gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=316227) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316227) ghc-smallcheck-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Hackage-Category: Testing (8), Data (1) Data: 1. Stream - A library for manipulating infinite lists. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-stream.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-stream-0.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Testing: 1. benchpress - Micro-benchmarking with detailed statistics. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-benchpress.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-benchpress-0.2.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 2. ChasingBottoms - For testing partial and infinite values. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-chasingbottoms.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-chasingbottoms-1.2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm 3. HTF - The Haskell Test Framework SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/htf.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/htf-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 4. IOSpec - A pure specification of the IO monad. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-iospec.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-iospec-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm DEPENDS-ON: ghc-stream 5. lazysmallcheck - A library for demand-driven testing of Haskell programs SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-lazysmallcheck.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 6. pqc - Parallel batch driver for QuickCheck SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-pqc.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-pqc-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 7. quickcheck-script - Automated test tool for QuickCheck. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/quickcheck-script.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/quickcheck-script-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm 8. smallcheck - Another lightweight testing library in Haskell. SPEC: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SPECS/ghc-smallcheck.spec SRPM: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-smallcheck-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Additionally, compiled RPMS could be found under: x86_64: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/ i386: http://krishnan.cc/devel/repository/fedora/RPMS/i386/ You would need the latest macros.ghc as found under: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 These were tested on a Fedora-8 machine, with GHC-6.8.3 installed. -Rajesh Krishnan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091840.m89Ier3m015181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #1 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:40:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316228) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316228) ghc-stream-0.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091843.m89IhMU3015476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rpm at greysector.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091843.m89Ih4dO015422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-09-09 14:43:03 EDT --- Please file one review request bug per package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091845.m89Ij5RV019003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #6 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:45:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316232) ghc-iospec-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091841.m89Ifwrh018376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #2 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:41:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316229) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316229) ghc-benchpress-0.2.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091843.m89Ihdbl018544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #4 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:43:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316230) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316230) ghc-chasingbottoms-1.2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091844.m89IiQfR018635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #5 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:44:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316231) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316231) htf-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091846.m89Ik3c5016257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #7 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:46:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316233) ghc-lazysmallcheck-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:48:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091848.m89Imh7e016574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #9 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:48:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316235) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316235) quickcheck-script-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091848.m89Im2Yb019748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #8 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:48:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316234) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316234) ghc-pqc-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:49:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091849.m89InO0i019973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #10 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:49:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=316236) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=316236) ghc-smallcheck-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091851.m89IpOWW017494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #11 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 14:51:23 EDT --- Just wondering, is there any way to attach multiple files in one go, on this web-based Bugzilla interface? -Rajesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091852.m89IqZfE017716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Rajesh Krishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |461654 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091852.m89IqYBE017691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Rajesh Krishnan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091857.m89IvYAv022084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|461654 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 18:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809091857.m89IvX7r022056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Depends on|460304 | Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-09-09 14:57:32 EDT --- Not again. Reviewers are in short supply, and the process simply cannot tolerate a huge number of improper requests being dumped onto it (again). In order for this to work at all: Please submit properly-formatted review requests using the template at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review Please submit a small and reasonable number of reviews at a time; five is a good number. Commentary gained from those reviews can be used to make succeeding packages better. Please upload the src.rpms and specs to some location and link to them in your review tickets. Attaching src.rpms and specs makes things inconvenient for the reviewers (which as stated above are in terribly short supply). If you do not have hosting, please say so and Fedora will arrange some for you. I am closing this ticket, and I may close other improperly formatted requests in the future. I apologize for being harsh, but I'm trying to keep some semblance of order in the review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 9 22:55:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809092255.m89MtbDB006369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-09 18:55:36 EDT --- I suggest starting with one package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 10 00:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 20:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809100053.m8A0rM2Y027775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-09 20:53:21 EDT --- a) turns out there's a new xmonad release. I've even built packages for it. I'll test the new macros, and rebuild everything. b) xmonad generally requires ghc-xmonad. there are very very few cases where it doesn't and that's not the normal use case. since we don't have a 'highly-suggested-install-this-or-die' category like debian, i'm going to acommodate 99% of use cases and note that xmonad definitely requires ghc-xmonad (although technically the other way around isn't necessary.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 10 03:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809100302.m8A32eZ2015474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #14 from Rajesh Krishnan 2008-09-09 23:02:39 EDT --- No problem. At least this would be a placeholder for info and pointers on the above-mentioned Haskell packages for others who would come searching for them. I will resubmit those using the other URL. But I guess FedoraProject needs to streamline its user interfaces for package submissions. That other URL (extras-review submit page) has the following shortcomings (that I couldn't find it documented anywhere): 1. Doesn't allow for specifying CC list. 2. Doesn't allow for marking dependencies of submitted packages. That is, if I have 2 packages A and B, and A is a dependency for B, and I submit A first and then B, it is not possible to specify the ticket ID of A at the time of submitting B. And hey, don't throttle me down if you can't keep up with me! :-) FedoraProject may have its technical deficiencies and managerial bureaucracies, but not the developers who are capable of submitting the packages, or the end-users who would come here looking for those. It is important for Fedora management to understand that, and not place a gag-order the contributors, by specifying an upper limit of 1 or 5 or whatever number suits their fancy; despite all the time/resource/reviewer-crunch and other limitations we might have at the moment. -Rajesh Krishnan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 11 00:23:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809110023.m8B0N9Zc030861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-10 20:23:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > 1. Doesn't allow for specifying CC list. True, but you can CC fedora-haskell-list after opening the bug. > 2. Doesn't allow for marking dependencies of submitted packages. That is, if > I have 2 packages A and B, and A is a dependency for B, and I submit A first > and then B, it is not possible to specify the ticket ID of A at the time of > submitting B. Again you can mark dependencies after opening by making the review bugs block/depend on each other. > And hey, don't throttle me down if you can't keep up with me! :-) Ok, but please follow the package submission process and steps carefully, specially if you are seeking sponsorship. :) I think once you have gotten one package through, things should be much easier and smoother: hence my suggestion to start with a single package until you get the feel for the review process. :) Thank you for your contributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 11 00:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 461654] Review-Request: Haskell Packages - 1 (hackage-category = Testing; total = 9) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809110023.m8B0NdV0029865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461654 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bos at serpentine.com Mon Sep 15 22:03:44 2008 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:03:44 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC 6.10 release candidate due this Friday Message-ID: I'm thinking of trying to build it in rawhide once it's out. Would anybody prefer that I not do so? From petersen at redhat.com Tue Sep 16 07:02:03 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:02:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC 6.10 release candidate due this Friday In-Reply-To: <1491753819.389831221548476008.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <243680707.389881221548523110.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Hi Bryan, > I'm thinking of trying to build it in rawhide once it's out. Would > anybody prefer that I not do so? How about starting with a scratch build first in koji so we can see "what the damage is"? :) We are past Feature Freeze now alas so strictly there should not be any more version bumps, so I am not sure it is a good idea to push it into f10 beyond the beta. (As much as I want to see 6.10 in fedora soon.) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 17 06:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 02:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809170605.m8H65F4P020592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #33 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-17 02:05:14 EDT --- I added the final approved macros.ghc in ghc-6.8.3-4.fc10. Once that has been tested let's backport it to f9 (and f8) as needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 17 14:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809171400.m8HE0030007206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #34 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-17 09:59:59 EDT --- Any chance I can see a scratch build for f9, so I can do some testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 23 01:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809230119.m8N1JnJl011715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-22 21:19:48 EDT --- It would nice to have this package so we can also get cabal-install into Fedora. Can you do an update of the submitted package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 23 01:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809230122.m8N1Mxe0027245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-22 21:22:58 EDT --- (haddock09 hasn't been pushed yet to f9 updates... so) your best bet currently is either just to install the above macros.ghc in /etc/rpm or pull the koji builds for f10 - they work fine on f9 for me. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=63354 (should be in rawhide after the beta freeze). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 23 08:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809230841.m8N8fxD0030648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-23 04:41:58 EDT --- Actually I messed up: my next build (probably ghc-6.8.3-5.fc10) should get macros.ghc in the right place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 25 02:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809250242.m8P2gC2w026947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #37 from Jens Petersen 2008-09-24 22:42:11 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-5.fc10 is now built btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 27 22:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809272238.m8RMc7LG022694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 --- Comment #38 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-09-27 18:38:06 EDT --- Should we close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 28 21:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460304] Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809282117.m8SLH0RF002553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #39 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-09-28 17:16:59 EDT --- Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 28 21:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809282117.m8SLH2Ed002636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Bug 426753 depends on bug 460304, which changed state. Bug 460304 Summary: Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 28 21:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809282117.m8SLH1Ew002597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Bug 426751 depends on bug 460304, which changed state. Bug 460304 Summary: Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 28 21:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200809282117.m8SLH3Ha002674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 460304, which changed state. Bug 460304 Summary: Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.