From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030003.n1303dfi002962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |- Haskell bindings to the |- Haskell binding to Xft |Xft, X Free Type interface | |library, and some Xrender | |parts | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LWoS030072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:31 EDT --- libedit-2.11-2.20080712cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LYXj024665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJ2p3027891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:18:58 EDT --- ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10, ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc10, haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10, ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-8.20081108.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc ghc-paths haddock ghc-gtk2hs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480422] ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJ5Sq026599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480422 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:04 EDT --- ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10, ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc10, haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10, ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-8.20081108.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc ghc-paths haddock ghc-gtk2hs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 00:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 19:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080032.n180WWZ9017790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-07 19:32:31 EDT --- Actually I forgot to remove the --auto-ghci-libs from ghc-pkg update in %post so this build will not actually fix the problem. :-( It should be fixed already in ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-0.1.fc11 in rawhide though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091158.n19BwvRF026622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 06:58:57 EDT --- ping anyone? :) It would be really good to get this into F11 - it is the "rubygems" of the Haskell world. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091253.n19CrD96005902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cabal2spec |Review Request: cabal2spec |- generates spec files for |- generates spec files for |Haskell packages (was: |Haskell packages |haskell-packaging) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091254.n19CsNAM007224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 07:54:22 EDT --- This is the changelog: * Mon Feb 9 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.5-1 - add cabal2spec-diff script to diff current spec against current template - add ghc-doc BR to binlib and lib templates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages (was: haskell-packaging) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091252.n19Cqr9J006964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 07:52:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm I dunno how long it will be before FPC revisits the Haskell Guidelines. (I guess I need to submit it formally after the initial RFC.) Maybe we can just complete this review and then make any updates later as appropriate? It would be good to have this included in F11 anyway IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091356.n19DuO7M021955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 08:56:23 EDT --- I rebuilt (updated) ghc-zlib - so that it installs correctly and this should actually build again now on rawhide (oops!): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115148 As soon as ghc-6.10.1 has been pushed to f10-updates I will build ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP there too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm (just fixed the URL field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:34:21 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:34:21 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] #fedora-haskell Message-ID: <22948243.4073731234251261880.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Hi There is a #fedora-haskell irc channel on Freenode which provides a quiet place for discussion of Fedora Haskell topics. (#haskell and #fedora-devel are great but too busy to ping people and slow conversations.:) Please drop in when you are on IRC. Jens ps I hope the activity of the SIG will soon pickup again: all the package reviews seem to have stalled. :-/ I will look at ghc-haskell-src-exts which is ready and help with others as best I can. A new cabal2spec should be available soon which generates and updates spec files, which will make cabal packaging even more (too much?) of a "breeze". :-) I requested a fedorahosted project for it too. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111112.n1BBCxgO023877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 06:12:58 EDT --- you should have %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools like we have in rpmdevtools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111903.n1BJ3uBo014764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111903.n1BJ3Zds025059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111908.n1BJ8vXP016099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-11 14:08:56 EDT --- I tried building the above SRPM on F10 using the following packages: ghc-6.10.1-8.fc11.i386 ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-5.fc11.i386 ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.i386 The build failed per the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111909.n1BJ9awc026464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #8 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-11 14:09:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331608) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331608) Log of failed build attempt Failed build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bos at serpentine.com Wed Feb 11 19:13:48 2009 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:13:48 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Packages blocked on review Message-ID: Hi, Yaakov - You submitted a bunch of packages for review late last year, but have not responded to any requests for further info on any of them, so they're all essentially dead in the water. What do we do about this? I have a little bit of bandwidth to review packages at the moment, but I don't want to waste my time on defunct requests that haven't been closed out. Thanks, B. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120139.n1C1dWtp031955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cabal-install Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-11 20:39:31 EDT --- The .spec file in comment 6 does not use %cabal_build: you trying another older package perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 06:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120656.n1C6u8w5023382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-12 01:56:07 EDT --- Here's my review. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. srpm is clean, binary rpm reports these: cabal-install.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/cabal cabal-install.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/cabal These are both acceptable. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [...] BSD3 == OK. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match [...] OK. # MUST: license(s) in %doc. OK. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream [...] OK. # MUST: successfully compile and build [...] OK. # MUST: architectures in ExcludeArch. OK. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [...] OK. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK. # MUST: shared library ldconfig NA. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable [...] NA. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK. # MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [...] OK. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NA. # MUST: %doc must not affect runtime OK. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Exempt. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files [...] NA. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix [...] NA. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages [...] NA. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [...] NA. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications [...] NA. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned [...] NA. # MUST: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. # SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text [...] NA. # SHOULD: description and summary translations No. # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK. # SHOULD: binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested x86_64 and i386. # SHOULD: functions as described OK. # SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK. # SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel [...] NA. # SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files [...] NA. # SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of [...] This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 04:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130411.n1D4BmCg028030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-12 23:11:47 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan, for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cabal-install Short Description: Haskell package (hackage) tool Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130641.n1D6fDux002068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:41:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130937.n1D9bJ0m006133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 04:37:18 EDT --- Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 15:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141523.n1EFNnZa027298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 09:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150937.n1F9bwM9022880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #49 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-15 04:37:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331958) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331958) Patch from current ghc-X11.spec to the new templates. I ported ghc-X11.spec to the new templates, here's the diff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160839.n1G8dJZk028014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 03:39:18 EDT --- Fixed Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm (The project will be hosted very soon at fedorahosted.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160849.n1G8n5ZB029896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 03:49:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332010) ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec-1.patch Sorry to keep moving the goal-posts... I released cabal2spec-0.6. This little patch should bring this package in line with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:07:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:07:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160907.n1G97oCL002024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 04:07:49 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-haskell-src-exts-0.4.8-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170451.n1H4p5lP027021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 23:51:01 EDT --- ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170452.n1H4q8wl027186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 06:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230603.n1N6363g020506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-23 01:03:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm * Mon Feb 23 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.7-1 - cabal2spec-0.7: - use %%global instead of %%define - quieten output of scripts - updates urls to fedorahosted Source and tarballs now on fedorahosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230911.n1N9Bae8001848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-23 04:11:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1145408 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d2586c3c99e2ae06c8721409cf440343 cabal2spec-0.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 487012] New: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012 Summary: Directory ownership problem: /etc/bash_completion.d Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy at hinegardner.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, jeremy at hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: darcs installs a script in /etc/bash_completion.d, but does not own the directory or Requires: bash-completion. Since the script can be considered a 'plug-in', and thus we should not force bash-completion on people who do not need it, the solution ought to be to simply own the directory in question. This is what bzr, git and rpmlint do. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install darcs 2. rpm -ql darcs | grep bash Actual results: darcs does not own /etc/bash_completion.d but installs a file in it Expected results: darcs owns the directory as well Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 01:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240140.n1O1eXL0027902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #50 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-23 20:40:29 EDT --- here's an update to match the latest guidelines proposal, using cabal2spec 0.7 SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241208.n1OC8QZD023180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 07:08:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cabal2spec Short Description: RPM packaging tool for Haskell Cabal Packages Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241209.n1OC9RoQ020707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cabal2spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241252.n1OCqisr002314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 07:52:43 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff output looks good. You might want to replace %define by %global eventually to keep up with the latest fedora packaging recommendations. (cabal2spec-0.7 does that.) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1156937 rpmlint output: ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8.a ghc-haskell-src-exts-doc.i386: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-haskell-src-exts ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: no-documentation ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8_p.a Probably good to fix the error above. cpphs is needed by ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 13:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241314.n1ODEUEv007695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 08:14:30 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. modulo above rpmlint description error [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD 3 Clause without advertising [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. a8bbb3de67480cfd2e3c4d7ad553a11d /home/petersen/tmp/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [waived for haskell] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora, but consider/take care of the above point/question. Thank you for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242111.n1OLBwuS010294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:11:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 01:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250154.n1P1sqoh007137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 lexual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss at lex.hider.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250226.n1P2QaXQ014561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #18 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-24 21:26:34 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250227.n1P2RGln014029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-24 21:27:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250952.n1P9qInw003916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-25 04:52:17 EDT --- Thanks - package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271529.n1RFT8Qr017781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:29:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333495) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333495) xmonad.spec-2.patch cabal2spec sync and some other requires tweaks. This also build, installs and uninstalls for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271447.n1RElBmj012886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271531.n1RFVIIT023126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #53 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:31:17 EDT --- One strange I think I did notice is that it seems like the binary redistribution clause is missing from the "BSD3" License - we should probably ask fedora-legal and upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271500.n1RF0Pdh015647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #52 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:00:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333489) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333489) ghc-X11.spec-3.patch Patch to latest cabal2spec-0.12. I think I am basically happy with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271446.n1REkSOw012779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michel.sylvan at gmail.com |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #51 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 09:46:23 EDT --- Taking over review for Michel based on comment 47. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281153.n1SBrWmB017741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #54 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-28 06:53:30 EDT --- http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spin-kickstarts.git Looking at the license again the missing clause is just: "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution." so I don't think there is a problem, but I just sent a mail to fedora-legal anyway to confirm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281155.n1SBt06d014876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #55 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-28 06:54:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spin-kickstarts.git Oops, that should have been: http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/X11/LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.