From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 01:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020156.n221uw4f021168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-01 20:56:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-haskell-src-exts Short Description: Library for Manipulating Haskell source Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 03:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020322.n223M7Zv028549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #56 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-01 22:22:06 EDT --- Update using said patch with one modification, i like the Summary as it was before. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 15:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021539.n22FdKc3011438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #20 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-02 10:39:18 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 16:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021640.n22GesoV025263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-02 11:40:52 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 00:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030005.n2305niV006696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #57 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-02 19:05:45 EDT --- Jens, don't forget, i need sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 00:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903030034.n230Yvpr025701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-02 19:34:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 3 11:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903031126.n23BQCp2013250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #58 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-03 06:26:04 EDT --- Okay according to spot this is okay as BSD: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-March/msg00002.html I am sponsoring Yaakov. Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output clean [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 73a4ba56b8cef69ce3659ab452e4530b X11-1.4.5.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1216598 [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. Thanks for your patience as this was also one of the early packages used as a testcase during revising the Haskell Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 01:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903040137.n241bwpR028885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #59 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-03 20:37:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-X11 Short Description: A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Owners: ynemoy, petersen Branches: F-9, F-10, F-11, devel InitialCC: ynemoy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 01:46:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903040146.n241kel3007640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #60 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-03 20:46:39 EDT --- That should be Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 06:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903040651.n246pUCx025394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 13:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041352.n24DqRW9002218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Nigel Metheringham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nigel at dev.intechnology.co.u | |k --- Comment #1 from Nigel Metheringham 2009-03-04 08:52:26 EDT --- Ubuntu won't give you a pony - http://fridge.ubuntu.com/files/no-pony-for-you.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 14:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041405.n24E5gWm005198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 15:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041554.n24FscHA028729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-03-04 10:54:37 EDT --- I'm wary of setting the expectation in Fedora that users will be allowed to have ponies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 18:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041847.n24IljdO031859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-04 13:47:44 EDT --- I'm wary of setting the expectation of there being trains in Fedora, but try: $ sudo yum install sl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 22:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903042225.n24MPAU2030726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson 2009-03-04 17:25:09 EDT --- I am allergic to ponies and find this extremely insensitive! -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 01:12:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050112.n251CdCK026674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 04:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050414.n254Eh8B011724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 lexual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss at lex.hider.name --- Comment #5 from lexual 2009-03-04 23:14:42 EDT --- It depends what you mean by pony? http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pony -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 04:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050414.n254E44u031001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 04:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050433.n254XYvZ032424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #61 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-04 23:33:33 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 11:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051100.n25B0dxo020165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-05 06:00:37 EDT --- Seriously -- please think for a while -- what value does this bring to users apart from growing the repositories a bit and thus making yum a bit slower? :) Here's some random points to consider: 1.) Does this comply with the "code not content" rule? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content Yes, I know there's a wrapper there, which probably classifies this as "code", still I'm inclined to think it's role in the package is rather marginal. 2.) Doesn't this duplicate existing features? "fortune" package seems to do something roughly similar. Why not use it? 3.) Does this comply with our licensing guidelines? The ponnies file doesn't have licensing information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 11:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051103.n25B3fxH007064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-05 06:03:41 EDT --- On the second look; there's about a dozen of authors of the pictures, most of them didn't license it for free redistribution. Closing. http://www.ascii-art.de/info/copyright/ The collection of ASCII art pictures, the text on these pages and the web design may not be copied for non-personal use without the author's written permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051632.n25GWJlm003771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-05 11:32:17 EDT --- 1) It's on the border of what's code or content, and there are several other packages that are on that border as well. Closing this bug report on that basis alone is arbitrary and unfair. 2) The fortune package plays a slightly different role. Aside from being basically a displayer of certain content, it has played an historical role in Unix and Linux for many years. While this pony might be a good candidate for content to be added to the fortune package, the role of this application is to fill a specific meme in the Red Hat and Fedora communities. 3) The licensing does present some questions. Rather than closing this request due to some prejudice, i've emailed upstream asking about the licensing issue. As i was writing this, i actually got a reply from Don mentioning that he does not have a valid license for this, and realistically we would need to find a public domain picture to use. I would also like to note that the upstream haskell community has accepted this package as part of their internal culture and memes as well. Licensing issues aside, packaging this would play the same role as packaging fortune in any Unix or Linux distro. IIRC fortune is not installed by default in Fedora. Nor would this package be. Think along the lines of "Haskell will give you a pony, but not if you use Fedora". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 17:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051743.n25HhBoJ000844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-05 12:43:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 1) It's on the border of what's code or content, and there are several other > packages that are on that border as well. Closing this bug report on that basis > alone is arbitrary and unfair. I would never close a bug for a reason like this. I'm sorry if I was misunderstood. > 2) The fortune package plays a slightly different role. Aside from being > basically a displayer of certain content, it has played an historical role in > Unix and Linux for many years. While this pony might be a good candidate for > content to be added to the fortune package, the role of this application is to > fill a specific meme in the Red Hat and Fedora communities. Understood. > 3) The licensing does present some questions. Rather than closing this request > due to some prejudice, i've emailed upstream asking about the licensing issue. > As i was writing this, i actually got a reply from Don mentioning that he does > not have a valid license for this, and realistically we would need to find a > public domain picture to use. > > I would also like to note that the upstream haskell community has accepted this > package as part of their internal culture and memes as well. Licensing issues > aside, packaging this would play the same role as packaging fortune in any Unix > or Linux distro. IIRC fortune is not installed by default in Fedora. Nor would > this package be. > > Think along the lines of "Haskell will give you a pony, but not if you use > Fedora". Feel free to reopen or open another review request once you have a package with valid license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052040.n25KeUZk007489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404 --- Comment #10 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-05 15:40:30 EDT --- Will do, best thing to do is cooperate with upstream on this one. I'll reopen if/when things get solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 8 23:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903082342.n28NgDZ1002668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #62 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-08 19:42:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=334452) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334452) ghc-X11.spec-4.patch My bad for not checking more carefully, but these hunks got dropped from ghc-X11.spec-3.patch. The only crucial one is the second one: base should not provide devel and fixing the arch list. You already commented on the Summary change, but just to explain one of the reasons for changing it is that Summary should be kept simple for PkgKit, but I leave it to your final discretion. Please close this bug NEXTRELEASE once the final package has been built also for i586. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 02:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths (renamed to ghc-ghc-paths) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090259.n292xSRQ031470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc-paths - |Review Request: ghc-paths - |library for information |library for information |about ghc paths |about ghc paths (renamed to | |ghc-ghc-paths) --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-08 22:59:28 EDT --- My "bad" but this package should be renamed to ghc-ghc-paths since the Haskell library itself is called ghc-paths. Renaming will keep cabal2spec-diff happy and make it easier to keep the package in sync with the templates. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-ghc-paths Short Description: Interface to ghc's install directories Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 03:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 23:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths (renamed to ghc-ghc-paths) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090312.n293CmJs025717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-08 23:12:47 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 04:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090402.n2942Sej008845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Bug 426753 depends on bug 426751, which changed state. Bug 426751 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 04:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090402.n2942P3F008798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #63 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-09 00:02:25 EDT --- re: base and devel, should be fixed re: summary - i wasn't aware of the use case, fixed re: archs, somehow missed applying that in patch-3, applied now and built closing bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 04:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090444.n294ig6h014778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-09 00:44:41 EDT --- Here begins the review After eyeballing it, of note, the actual url is: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/hscolour/ This begs the question, do we want to put the onus on the packager to go to the hackage page and see if there is an alternate link given? Since that link is given in the cabal file anyways, should cabal2spec pull it out automatically? Or rather, do we want to have some sort of OCD everything must link to hackage if it's available there so we can be sure it's a hackage package? IMO the upstream maintains a nice website. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] ghc-hscolour-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/hscolour-1.12/libHShscolour-1.12_p.a ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hscolour-devel hscolour.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/HsColour 0775 hscolour.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/HsColour 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Check # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . Check # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . FAIL: see rpmlint error about file permissions # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Check # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Check # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] Check # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] To the supposed chagrin of the author, Check :) # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] Check, but please use block instead of cursive next time. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Check - 4328a84b87b245693bcf10b49c608e43 # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Check - x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Currently excludes ppc64 in conformance with ghc issues. Check. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Check. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Check # MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [13] Check # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] Fail: See above rpmlint # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] Check # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Check # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] Check # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] Check # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] Check # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] Check # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] Check # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] Check # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] Check # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] Check * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] Check - x86_64 * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] Not possible, lack of ppc machine. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Check * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] Check * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] Check * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 01:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100125.n2A1Plit000442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-09 21:25:47 EDT --- ping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 11:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101115.n2ABF1Jw005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-10 07:15:01 EDT --- [ok, take2: first attempt to reply earlier disappeared with firefox...] (In reply to comment #1) > http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/hscolour/ Thanks - fixing. > IMO the upstream maintains a nice website. Agreed better to use an upstream website when available and up to date. > ghc-hscolour-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation > ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hscolour-devel These can be waived I think. > hscolour.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/HsColour 0775 Reproduced and still investigating. > hscolour.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/HsColour Yes, I think this is common to ghc executables. I checked and alex, cabal-install, cpphs, ghc, darcs, happy, etc all have this too. > # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. [14] > Fail: See above rpmlint Fixing with %attr for now anyway. SPEC: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/hscolour/hscolour.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/hscolour/hscolour-1.12-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 11:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101145.n2ABjU1o011345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-10 07:45:29 EDT --- I don't know if the ghc-X11 = 1.4.5 is really necessary? Well according to hackage it requires X11 (>=1.4.3), so I suggest using >= 1.4.3 unless there is a good reason not to. BSD3 is called BSD in Fedora. Otherwise the cabal2spec-diff looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 11:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101149.n2ABnNis012396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-10 07:49:24 EDT --- (Arguably the xmonad requires of ghc is redundant since it requires ghc-xmonad-devel, which requires ghc anyway, but I guess it doesn't really matter either way: I suppose it further reminds one that xmonad may recompile itself in userspace when customized.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 06:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130610.n2D6A0Xh032292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-03-13 02:10:00 EDT --- Who is Jens pinging? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 06:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130615.n2D6FTOq001059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-13 02:15:30 EDT --- Me, I think -- I think I need to update to the new Haskell templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 22:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132259.n2DMxsZY030710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #23 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-13 18:59:54 EDT --- $ python >>> import this Explicit is better than implicit. Anyways, we need to include ghc-xmonad-devel because xmonad can and will recompile itself on the fly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 23:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132300.n2DN09MS031085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-13 19:00:09 EDT --- Ok, URL is good. Waiving the warnings and error that can be waived for the obvious reasons. They were included only for completeness. I'm gonna let the executable-stack warning pass for now. This might bear some looking into. The other issues have been fixed, so this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 23:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903132340.n2DNeIbf002754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #24 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-13 19:40:18 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Arguably, this package needs to be rebuilt everytime there's an update to X11, because of static compilation. Still, there is one use case for giving a more generic required version of ghc-X11, and that is the user who needs to recompile to an earlier version for what ever reason. Note that fileperms was fixed too. This is an issue that seems to be common to haskell things compiled in ghc, so we may want to fix this in the template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 08:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170834.n2H8YGS2008802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-17 04:34:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hscolour Short Description: Haskell source highlighting Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 08:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170847.n2H8lIsx010112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-17 04:47:16 EDT --- Thanks for the update. > Note that fileperms was fixed too. This is an issue that seems to be common to > haskell things compiled in ghc, so we may want to fix this in the template. You need to do that just for the bin file like I did with hscolour, not for all files, like this: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc LICENSE %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/%{name} Otherwise looks ok to me: I would like test it in rawhide and then do the final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 16:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903171633.n2HGXfAq026820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #26 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-17 12:33:40 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Note to self defattr != attr :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 03:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180331.n2I3V9uA004549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-17 23:31:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 05:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488665] Review Request: hscolour - Haskell source code highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180542.n2I5gqFf022713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-18 01:42:50 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 09:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903180919.n2I9JvjI004193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-03-18 05:19:54 EDT --- I think the package needs to be updated now for i586 (ie to the latest cabal2spec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 22:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192212.n2JMCvX7012238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-19 18:12:50 EDT --- Ok, I updated it and started building it in Koji. If it succeeds I'll close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 22:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192226.n2JMQ6TL014451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Bug 479800 depends on bug 479796, which changed state. Bug 479796 Summary: Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 22:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192226.n2JMQ5xR014420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-19 18:25:59 EDT --- Ok, it built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1250436 Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 23:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192329.n2JNTAB9024716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-19 19:29:04 EDT --- Updated: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-uniplate.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-uniplate-1.2.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Builds in mock for rawhide but not F-10 here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 23:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202338.n2KNcbOA020367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-20 19:38:26 EDT --- I'll take this review. Looking at the spec file briefly, i can see several things * The URL should probably point to the project's homepage rather than the hackage page. See the bug for hscolour for more reasoning Otherwise, we look good here. Following the review guidelines: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] ghc-uniplate-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-uniplate-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/uniplate-1.2.0.3/libHSuniplate-1.2.0.3_p.a ghc-uniplate-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-uniplate-devel 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. PASS # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . PASS # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . PASS # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . PASS # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . PASS # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] PASS # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] PASS # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] PASS # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] PASS # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. PASS # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] PASS # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] PASS (misses PPC64 which is allowed for Haskell packages using GHC.) # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. PASS # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] PASS # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] PASS # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] PASS # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] PASS # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] PASS # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] PASS # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] PASS # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] PASS # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] PASS # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] N/A (excepted because Haskell does not do shared libraries) # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] PASS # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] N/A # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] N/A # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] PASS * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] PASS (x86_64) * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] Not Done, lack of PPC architecture. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. No Tests included with package. Please convince upstream to write unit tests, kthxbye. N/A * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] PASS * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] PASS * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] N/A In short, fix the URL, and i can approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 23:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202339.n2KNdF8b016000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 23:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202351.n2KNp0WM017765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-20 19:50:51 EDT --- Fixed URL in: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-uniplate.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-uniplate-1.2.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 23:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202355.n2KNtPOa023122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-03-20 19:55:15 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 23:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202357.n2KNvQ08018731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-20 19:57:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-uniplate Short Description: Uniform type generic traversals Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 05:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903220540.n2M5eejs021439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-03-22 01:40:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 16:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221611.n2MGBBCK011885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #27 from Till Maas 2009-03-22 12:10:55 EDT --- The manpage and the example config file (xmonad.hs) from the directory "man" are not packaged. Also it seems to me that a xmonad.desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions is missing, which allows one to select xmonad as wm in gdm. I used this the following one with an older xmonad release, maybe it works with the current one, too: http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 21:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903222154.n2MLsEFK003259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2009-03-22 17:53:59 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1253377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 21:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903222154.n2MLsFxA003296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Bug 479800 depends on bug 479799, which changed state. Bug 479799 Summary: Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230853.n2N8r3UC015913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 09:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230914.n2N9EjY8021386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 20:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903302048.n2UKmI12028834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #28 from Till Maas 2009-03-30 16:48:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=337244) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=337244) add desktop file, package manpage, sample config and other docs The xmonad.desktop works for me with gdm, but xmonad needs a config file in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs to even run. Maybe a wrapper should be added that creates such a config file if there is none. This config file could make xmonad display its manpage per default when it is started to help users new to xmonad. This was what wmii did iirc and I found it pretty helpful back then. I will write such a wrapper if it will be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 09:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903310959.n2V9xawu007105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2009-03-31 05:59:34 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft and ghc-utf8-string seem not to be required by this package, but this review requests depends on their review requests. The review requests are also not in a reviewable state, can they be closed? Bugs: #426750 #426752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.