From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040403.n4443irB007668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-04 00:03:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > New update Thanks! > 1) carries around a ppc workaround that really should go in macros.ghc Yeah we could add something in the macros to help with this, but it is a bit tedious: I hope we can fix the real problem on ppc soon. > 2) only builds on fedora 12 (yay?) I hope to backport latest ghc to f11 soon. We might have to wait for a new gtk2hs release. > 3) converts the value added default config into a patch directly against the > upstream source. what this patch does is replaces the xmonad line of the > default verbose config with an expansion that loads xterm with the man page > showing. in the future, i'll probably add a comment to the user Good idea. I think better to rename the patch to xmonad-config-show-manpage.patch or something like that. > 4) includes just xmonad-start without doing xmonad-session. Good - I think the name in the .desktop file should just be "xmonad" or "XMonad" though not "xmonad-start". > 5) renumbers the source to make more sense > 6) includes other changes proposed here Ok Otherwise looks pretty good to me now. I am going to take it for a spin and then do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050358.n453wtUb024051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-04 23:58:51 EDT --- I tested the scratch build on f11 with f12 ghc and it works fine for me. I will attach a patch for the suggestions above after this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050400.n4540lRX023898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 00:00:45 EDT --- Here is my formal review. +:ok, !:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [!] MUST: rpmlint output Please fix the tabs that appeared spec file for the patch. Also fixed in my next patch. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. Follows Haskell Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 03a8f0a420902d9eea3df1d8d62598c7 xmonad-0.8.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050410.n454A4OR025808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050409.n4549V0D025419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 00:09:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342410) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342410) xmonad-final.patch I suggest making these small changes before importing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050430.n454U1Aw028868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050439.n454drjp030277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-05 00:39:53 EDT --- Re: comments from Jens on IRC: Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm This moves copying the license file over from the %build section to the %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050556.n455uMrR010439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 01:56:22 EDT --- The License should be GPLv2+ at least or maybe even GPLv3. Not sure if ghc-rpm-macros should not require ghc - macros.ghc is not really useful without it. On the other hand any package that uses the macros will also need to BR ghc I guess anyway, but still it does not seem unreasonable to require ghc in my opinion. Otherwise looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061758.n46HwRsr011634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 13:58:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmonad Short Description: a tiling window manager written in haskell Owners: ynemoy Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fedora-haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bos at serpentine.com Wed May 6 20:02:01 2009 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:01 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform Message-ID: Now that the first Haskell Platform release is out, we'll have to retool our Haskell packaging to handle it. Fun! :-\ http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform The thing that's tricky is that the Platform is a combination of libraries and tools, combining the old "extralibs" GHC tarball with several libraries and tools that we already package. Ideally, there would be some way to run "yum install ghc-platform" and have all the right things pulled in, but RPM doesn't have an apt-like notion of metapackages. I guess we could have ghc-platform be like basesystem, a package that is just a list of requires and provides. Here would be my suggested steps. 1. Don't worry about repackaging existing packages unless there's a newer version specified by the Platform. 2. Shrink the ghc package down to just GHC and core libraries. 3. Create a new package that we manage independently, called maybe ghc-platform-devel, that contains the former extralibs. 4. Create a new "meta" package that requires ghc, ghc-platform-devel, the various libraries that we already package separately, cabal-install, alex, and happy. Does this sound reasonable? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062056.n46Ku8oI016649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #49 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 16:56:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Wed May 6 21:08:18 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7f692fec0905061408m57ac5f6fpb61b8ac109a6c5f4@mail.gmail.com> 2009/5/6 Bryan O'Sullivan : > Now that the first Haskell Platform release is out, we'll have to retool our > Haskell packaging to handle it. Fun! :-\ > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_Platform > > The thing that's tricky is that the Platform is a combination of libraries > and tools, combining the old "extralibs" GHC tarball with several libraries > and tools that we already package. > > Ideally, there would be some way to run "yum install ghc-platform" and have > all the right things pulled in, but RPM doesn't have an apt-like notion of > metapackages. I guess we could have ghc-platform be like basesystem, a > package that is just a list of requires and provides. > > Here would be my suggested steps. > > Don't worry about repackaging existing packages unless there's a newer > version specified by the Platform. > Shrink the ghc package down to just GHC and core libraries. > Create a new package that we manage independently, called maybe > ghc-platform-devel, that contains the former extralibs. > Create a new "meta" package that requires ghc, ghc-platform-devel, the > various libraries that we already package separately, cabal-install, alex, > and happy. > > Does this sound reasonable? Works for me. I don't see any reason to object. What do we need to do to get to this point? -Yaakov From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062204.n46M42pj029744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 426753, which changed state. Bug 426753 Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062204.n46M40BN029684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 18:03:59 EDT --- Built on rawhide and Fedora 11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101104 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070026.n470Qxvo023500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #51 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 20:26:58 EDT --- Thanks, F11 build needs to be tweaked or wait for ghc-rpm-macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070037.n470buQn027543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #52 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 20:37:56 EDT --- Yeah, i was gonna do that in one fell swoop. If someone could finish that review, it'll mean i won't have to bother putting in a temporary fix in the xmonad-fc11 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 01:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 21:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070100.n4710u2U031195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 21:00:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Includes AUTHORS and GPLv3 License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070335.n473ZCSd026056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070334.n473YcgL025664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 23:34:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342766) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342766) ghc-rpm-macros.spec-2.patch Basically looks ok now to me but would suggest these small changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070344.n473i5jt028089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 23:44:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070343.n473hYfY027497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 23:43:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071231.n47CVm5R004312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 02:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080200.n4820oG0001160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-07 22:00:49 EDT --- Ok looks good to me now. I think I forgot to mention yesterday that I was also thinking we should only ship this on archs with ghc. (In principle we might also want arch specific macros (eg to work around ppc breakage for example;) at some point.) So I am inclined to do -BuildArch: noarch +# fedora ghc archs: +ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 03:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080339.n483dahg018737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-07 23:39:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342976) ghc-rpm-macros-4.patch Need %setup to actually build within a dir (ie when overriding ~/rpmbuild/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:40:53 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform In-Reply-To: <570377850.183721241757530182.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1323816196.183851241757653497.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" wrote: > Now that the first Haskell Platform release is out, we'll have to retool our Haskell packaging to handle it. Fun! :-\ : > The thing that's tricky is that the Platform is a combination of libraries and tools, combining the old "extralibs" GHC tarball with several libraries and tools that we already package. Yep, I think we can do it all with a haskell-platform package that requires all the right bits. For the first cut we can do the deps by hand, but we really need cabal2spec to calculate the deps and versions for us automatically or it will be too error prone in the long run. I may try to take an initial stab at it over the weekend. The alternative might still be just to ship the whole haskell-platform tarball and deprecate the packages that it obsoletes, though it is a bit wasteful in terms of rebuilds and updates though less burden to maintain perhaps. Do we still really need still ghc-extralibs? I thought the platform more or less replaces that. Perhaps any necessary missing packages could just be separated into new packages on a needed basis. Jens From bos at serpentine.com Fri May 8 05:06:33 2009 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:06:33 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform In-Reply-To: <1323816196.183851241757653497.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <570377850.183721241757530182.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <1323816196.183851241757653497.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: > > Do we still really need still ghc-extralibs? I thought the platform more > or less replaces that. It does replace extralibs, yep. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petersen at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:32:22 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:32:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] GHC and Haskell Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1676552894.200851241760742876.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" wrote: > It does replace extralibs, yep. Ah yes I see what you're saying: ghc-platform-devel, ok. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 06:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 02:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090616.n496Gk1Y006935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #9 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-09 02:16:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Makes this noarch. Otherwise, patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 08:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 04:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090801.n4981dAs025699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-09 04:01:39 EDT --- Hmm, I still don't see the point in shipping this package on archs without ghc builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 05:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 01:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100532.n4A5WcuJ011584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rzhou at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 05:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 01:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100532.n4A5WfCN017919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rzhou at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 05:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 01:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100532.n4A5WWir017883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rzhou at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 06:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 02:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100652.n4A6qd4T022346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 02:52:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343247) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343247) ghc-rpm-macros-6.patch Bah, we forgot to run rpmlint on ghc-rpm-macros.noarch. This fixes: ghc-rpm-macros.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.ghc and simplifies the changelog. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100706.n4A76rlF030695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 03:06:53 EDT --- This is a simple packaging of macros.ghc which is currently bundled with the main large ghc package. Here is the review: +:ok, !:needs attention, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [NA] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [NA] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [!] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. %config taken care of by patch 6 above [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [NA] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Please apply the attached fix for the rpmlint warning. Package is APPROVED by petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100708.n4A78rl8030828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 03:08:53 EDT --- Once the package is imported and built, I will remove macros.ghc from ghc/devel and then update the templates in cabal2spec to BR this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From rjones at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:22:54 2009 From: rjones at redhat.com (Richard W.M. Jones) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:22:54 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [ANNOUNCE] Bindings for libguestfs Message-ID: <20090510152254.GA31295@amd.home.annexia.org> I added some partial bindings for libguestfs[1] here: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=haskell/Guestfs.hs;hb=HEAD Some very simple example programs which use these bindings: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=tree;f=haskell;hb=HEAD Any comments welcome. My Haskell skills are pretty terrible, so I'm sure there are many ways these can be improved. If someone wants to look at binding the rest of the API, then please send me some patches. (Note that the Guestfs.hs file is automatically generated). BTW, I found the documentation on writing FFIs very contradictory and incomplete. For example, I was completely defeated trying to find ways to do simple stuff like passing in integers or returning booleans. *Potentially* Haskell's FFI seems like it might be one of the best out of the languages I've used so far, but it needs way more documentation and examples. Rich. [1] http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/ -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ From petersen at redhat.com Sun May 10 20:47:36 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:47:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: Distro opinions sought on Haskell Platform policy question In-Reply-To: <1241963825.17665.145.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <1824670382.53951241988456413.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Duncan Coutts Subject: Distro opinions sought on Haskell Platform policy question Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:57:05 +0000 Size: 3447 URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 01:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130139.n4D1dxSE025702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-12 21:39:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-rpm-macros Short Description: RPM macros for building GHC packages Owners: ynemoy petersen Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fedora-haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130510.n4D5AVwk019398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:10:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130755.n4D7tvf6016018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-13 03:55:55 EDT --- Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Thu May 14 19:19:48 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: post to epel-devel list In-Reply-To: <20090514131400.39db535f@ohm.scrye.com> References: <20090514131400.39db535f@ohm.scrye.com> Message-ID: <7f692fec0905141219l192cd1c2gc7e6b3c1891bafbd@mail.gmail.com> I'll try to get on it later if no one else picks it up. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kevin Fenzi Date: 2009/5/14 Subject: FWD: post to epel-devel list To: loupgaroublond at gmail.com I thought I approved this post, but it hasn't shown up yet, so I thought I would send it your way: From: d.den.brok at uni-bonn.de (Dennis den Brok) To: epel-devel-list at redhat.com Subject: Request for xmonad Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:07:49 +0200 (CEST) Hallo, I'd like to ask for xmonad to be pulled to EPEL, if possible, as there doesn't seem to be any (modern) tiling window manager available as (semi-)official RPM for RHEL. Thanks in any case. Regards, Dennis den Brok PS: Please CC me when/if answering; I'm not subscribed to the list. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190138.n4J1caJI030671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Tony Fu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo+ | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 21:38:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190227.n4J2RccC003247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 22:27:37 EDT --- For impatient users waiting, in the meantime you can install xmonad-contrib in your a/c using "cabal install xmonad-contrib". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190325.n4J3PEmW026110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:25:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ghc-X11-xft and ghc-utf8-string seem not to be required by this package Well it is true that you can build xmonad-contrib without them since they are optional build deps, but various modules do require XMonad.Util.Font for xft support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190726.n4J7QNt7030478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:26:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190731.n4J7Veka005370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:31:39 EDT --- ping - original package submission is gone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190730.n4J7UCVZ005159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190731.n4J7Vp0W005405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190733.n4J7X0vS031849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:32:59 EDT --- Please always CC fedora-haskell-list for haskell package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 493450] Updating a release bump resets ghc's internal package list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190734.n4J7Ysvx005811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493450 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:34:53 EDT --- Oh hmm that is bad and "should not happen"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190740.n4J7e0de006817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-19 03:39:59 EDT --- Well? Is there something I should be responding to? :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 09:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480422] ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190922.n4J9M2Tg028503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480422 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 09:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 493450] Updating a release bump resets ghc's internal package list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190919.n4J9Jawt027766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493450 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 05:19:35 EDT --- Are you sure? I just tried in i386 f11 downgrading to f10 and back up to f11 ghc and X11 package appeared for me all along. package.conf is already marked %config(noreplace) though - I thought that should take care of it. (We should really move package.conf to /etc like debian, but I think that is another story.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 02:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210254.n4L2sVum025055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-20 22:54:31 EDT --- Well I guess the submission needs updating to the latest template. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292157.n4TLvMtx003468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:57:21 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292155.n4TLt1s1001681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:55:00 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292158.n4TLwdG0002535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:58:38 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string.spec This is my first time trying to package so let me know if anything needs fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 22:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 22:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292204.n4TM42WR004857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ghc-utf8-string - Support |ghc-hinotify - Haskell |reading and writing UTF8 |binding to INotify |Strings | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 22:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292213.n4TMDdv8006519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.