From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 00:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010001.n9101w1l021646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 20:01:57 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 06:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 02:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910010601.n916173b001323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 02:01:07 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 1 10:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 06:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 526664] New: happy post script failed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: happy post script failed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526664 Summary: happy post script failed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: happy AssignedTo: bos at serpentine.com ReportedBy: ak at axet.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, bos at serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora rawhide, install haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-3.fc12.i686, happy as dependency Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package happy-1.18.4-3.fc12.i686 warning: %post(happy-1.18.4-3.fc12.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 04:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 526664] happy post script failed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020430.n924U9YH010095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526664 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 2 04:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 00:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 526664] happy post script failed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910020429.n924Tvqi009742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526664 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-02 00:29:56 EDT --- Thanks for the report - I already built a fixed package yesterday after discovering same. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=134662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 3 19:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 15:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910031908.n93J8xPF013541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:08:58 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 5 00:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 526664] happy post script failed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910050016.n950GZFd007183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526664 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-04 20:16:35 EDT --- Build was accepted by rel-eng for f12-beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 02:52:00 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:52:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Re: [Fedora-spins] haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts In-Reply-To: <1082372984.331191255488657748.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <453887198.331211255488720500.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> [June 2009] > I would like to argue once more for separate packages in > the Fedora distribution; nevermind the actual names of the packages > I'm using here, those are open for debate; > = spin-kickstarts (or rather; fedora-kickstarts) = > = fedora-kickstarts-extra = Any update here? Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in SCM or some package? How about subpackaging for now? Jens From petersen at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 05:02:17 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:02:17 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Re: [Fedora-spins] haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts In-Reply-To: <20091014032842.GA22096@wolff.to> Message-ID: <1646753349.335171255496537300.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > > Any update here? Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in SCM or > some package? > > I don't know about the Haskell spin, but there is now a way for spins > to be in git without being published as ISOs. Cool (I thought there already were some.:) > It still would need to go through the Spins process as far as being > approved the the SIG. So what is the next step then? :) Jens From petersen at redhat.com Wed Oct 14 06:45:22 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Re: [Fedora-spins] haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts In-Reply-To: <20091014052840.GA11436@wolff.to> Message-ID: <2091552787.337321255502722934.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > You should be able to follow: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process Thanks - I had overlooked the Talk comments... :-/ Hope we can get this to move now :) Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 10:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] New: Segmentation fault while starting GHCi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Segmentation fault while starting GHCi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Summary: Segmentation fault while starting GHCi Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos at serpentine.com ReportedBy: stefan at seekline.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, bos at serpentine.com, loupgaroublond at gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: At startup of GHCi a segmentation fault is reported. gdb --args /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/ghc -B/usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/. -dynload wrapped --interactive (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/ghc -B/usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/. -dynload wrapped --interactive [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x48bff490 (LWP 6159)] [New Thread 0x495ff490 (LWP 6160)] GHCi, version 6.10.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x10fa7b80 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x10fa7b80 in ?? () #1 0x10fa7c80 in ?? () #2 0x100f8094 in ?? () #3 0x10facf04 in ?? () #4 0x10fa855c in ?? () #5 0x10fa7e7c in ?? () #6 0x10fa7f98 in ?? () #7 0x0fe0f3fc in generic_start_main (main=, argc=, ubp_av=, auxvec=, init=, fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=) at ../csu/libc-start.c:220 #8 0x0fe0f5a0 in __libc_start_main (argc=, ubp_av=, ubp_ev=, auxvec=, rtld_fini=, stinfo=, stack_on_entry=) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/libc-start.c:92 #9 0x00000000 in ?? () I installed the debugging symbol package for glibc but couldn't find a package for ghc. If someone could point me to a debugging symbol package, then I could provide a more verbose output of gdb. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.10.3-3.fc11 How reproducible: Just run "ghci" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 18:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] Segmentation fault while starting GHCi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910151817.n9FIH68E017614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 15 22:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] Segmentation fault while starting GHCi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910152238.n9FMcSeD014256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-10-15 18:38:27 EDT --- Note: I filed a bug upstream about ghci segfaulting on PPC a long time ago: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 00:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] Segmentation fault while starting GHCi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160020.n9G0KgQW015727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-15 20:20:41 EDT --- Stefan, perhaps you could try and see if ghc-6.12 will be any better here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 00:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] Segmentation fault while starting GHCi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160023.n9G0N06c015930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-15 20:23:00 EDT --- Further, I don't think Fedora has resources to work on this alas, so echoing Conrad: best to push on this upstream. Note that upstream don't provide Linux/ppc builds any more (and we don't have ppc64, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 16 00:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] ghci segfaults at startup on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910160024.n9G0OKfA016241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Segmentation fault while |ghci segfaults at startup |starting GHCi |on ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 10:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] ghci segfaults at startup on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910181007.n9IA7NxC000952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-10-18 06:07:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Stefan, perhaps you could try and see if ghc-6.12 will be any better here. I tried SVN snapshot 20091015 but the problem still persists. (In reply to comment #3) > Further, I don't think Fedora has resources to work on this alas, > so echoing Conrad: best to push on this upstream. Note that upstream > don't provide Linux/ppc builds any more (and we don't have ppc64, etc). I understand this completely if resources aren't available. Fedora is not responsible to fix such things and according to Conrad upstream is already informed. So I will close this bug as WONTFIX. Thanks for informing upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 18 17:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] ghci segfaults at startup on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910181713.n9IHD6Yk028168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-10-18 13:13:05 EDT --- Just to be clear (for future readers of this ticket): GHC on PPC still (mostly) works, just not interactive mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 02:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 529168] ghci segfaults at startup on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910210251.n9L2pV2Z023931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529168 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |UPSTREAM --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-20 22:51:30 EDT --- Segfault also happens with 6.12-RC1 fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 21 14:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910211455.n9LEtf1r031774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #18 from Arun SAG 2009-10-21 10:55:39 EDT --- Added new review request: emacs-goodies -Misc addons for GNU/emacs and gnus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 07:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 507866] On Fedora 11, a Fedora 10 package is 'stuck' in the package database, even when rebuilt (ghc-haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10.x86_64) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230726.n9N7QmMV015967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507866 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Component|ghc-HTTP |haddock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 23 07:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 507866] On Fedora 11, a Fedora 10 package is 'stuck' in the package database, even when rebuilt (ghc-haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10.x86_64) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910230731.n9N7VN0Z017640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507866 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-23 03:31:21 EDT --- Thanks for the report. Probably better to avoid ghc-haddock* since not very used anyway. I don't think anything in fedora BRs it anyway and given that F10 is nearing EOL I don't feel it is worth an update really and propose to close this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From michael.silvanus at gmail.com Sat Oct 24 07:04:22 2009 From: michael.silvanus at gmail.com (Michel Alexandre Salim) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Reviewer needed: ghc-language-c Message-ID: <615c05430910240004w39494ba1s57b5598720bd9208@mail.gmail.com> Does anyone want to do a review swap? I need this packaged as a prerequisite for pure-gen, a C-binding generator for the quite interesting (and Haskell-esque, at least in syntax) Pure programming language. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 19:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910261915.n9QJFYL3025145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Jerry James 2009-10-26 15:15:33 EDT --- The comment about removing the Ctrl-L characters is wrong. Those characters are commonly used in Elisp source files to separate sections. There is no benefit to removing them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 26 23:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910262349.n9QNnHht024922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-26 19:49:17 EDT --- BTW have you thought about xemacs? Not sure if any xemacs-packages bundle haskell-mode, maybe not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 01:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910270149.n9R1nS2I028894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #21 from Arun SAG 2009-10-26 21:49:28 EDT --- Upstream says: "This release should work on any recent version of Emacs. If it doesn't: complain. If it works on XEmacs, consider yourself lucky." I haven't tried haskell-mode in XEmacs; Will try when i get time; New version is released , will update shortly; http://projects.haskell.org/haskellmode-emacs/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 27 15:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910271545.n9RFjoau021268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #22 from Jerry James 2009-10-27 11:45:49 EDT --- The xemacs-packages-extra package contains version 2.1 of haskell-mode. I'll look into getting that updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 02:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290233.n9T2X7RU013313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #23 from Arun SAG 2009-10-28 22:33:05 EDT --- Updated to version 2.5.1 SPEC File: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1775729 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1775731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 08:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290831.n9T8VZcw008475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 08:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290841.n9T8fxIO026564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 04:41:58 EDT --- Looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 08:50:17 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Reviewer needed: ghc-language-c In-Reply-To: <286433760.504001256806148501.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <503873918.504141256806217482.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Michel Alexandre Salim" wrote: > Does anyone want to do a review swap? I can try - though I am kind of busy currently. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 I had a quick look and don't see any obvious problems - it looks fine to me. I am sure people here would appreciate if you could review 1 of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?emailcc1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com&bug_status=__open__&component=Package%20Review Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 09:07:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290907.n9T97omV000907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 05:07:49 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff looks sane, should be ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 09:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290915.n9T9FI5o003096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 05:15:16 EDT --- xmobar.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 09:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290917.n9T9H6bC003362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 05:17:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366582) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366582) xmobar.spec-1.patch You don't need doc/prof for a binary only package, plus other minor fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 09:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290937.n9T9bRDt008598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 05:37:25 EDT --- I haven't checked (yet) but is the License tag really GPL+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 09:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910290935.n9T9ZRwu008297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 05:35:25 EDT --- You forgot to update the srpm. ghc-hinotify.src: E: description-line-too-long This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature, allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 29 16:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910291652.n9TGq96a013655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #19 from Conrad Meyer 2009-10-29 12:52:08 EDT --- GPL+ is the default if they just specify "GPL". I can double check later today or if you want to do it, that works too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 30 01:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910300115.n9U1FWGn006686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-29 21:15:32 EDT --- Latest version is now: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint-1.6.11 (In reply to comment #19) > GPL+ is the default if they just specify "GPL". I can double check later today > or if you want to do it, that works too. Ok I looked over the sources and indeed no src headers. :-/ Could you please contact the author and ask him to add license headers to all the main source files - that should clarify the intent (which I guess is GPLv2+) but until then we probably have to go with GPL+... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 30 02:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910300223.n9U2NxRY009901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer 2009-10-29 22:23:59 EDT --- I emailed upstream about licensing; version bump: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.11-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.