<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 12, 2007 2:47 AM, Jonathan Steffan <<a href="mailto:jonathansteffan@gmail.com">jonathansteffan@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:55:47 -0500 Michael DeHaan <<a href="mailto:mdehaan@redhat.com">mdehaan@redhat.com</a>> wrote: > Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > > Mike McGrath wrote: > >>> and we were going to > >>>> judge jigdo a success if a certain % (compared to bittorrent) > >>>> use jigdo. What % would that be? > >>> > >>> Jigdo would in this case be particularly useful to those with a > >>> local mirror as they have 99% of the content already (90% if you > >>> have F9T3?). Because it is particularly useful to some, and > >>> completely weird and strange for others, the number of users that > >>> will use it if BitTorrent is an alternative wouldn't be a very > >>> good indicator to see if it is actually a viable distribution > >>> method for the whole of Fedora, neither is it the goal for these > >>> proposals. > >> > >> I'm talking specifically about people going to the get-fedora page > >> and clicking on the torrent link vs the jigdo link. Out of every > >> 100 people, how many people will click on the jigdo link? > >> </div><div class="Ih2E3d">> Jigdo did not seem to be very popular among anyone I talked to once > they figured out the minimal install images were available. </div>I will admit, our poll on <a href="http://spins.fedoraunity.org" target="_blank">spins.fedoraunity.org</a> showed that more users want to use BitTorrent. I still think these users just had no concept of what Jigdo is *good* at and were left to deal with our growing pains setting everything up. We do apologize for that. We do, however, 110% support Jigdo in many cases: * Testing images can easily be "upgraded" to the next release, only downloading what has changed * Re-Spins: The same goes for Re-Spins, an end users (and the testers) can easily "update" their ISO, again, only having to download what has changed * Any Spin: Not all mirrors chose to carry the ISO images. A next-hop or local mirror might not be available with the ISO images for direct download. This very close mirror will be able to be used to "put together" the ISO image and with our awesome new MirrorManager the acquisition of this data source will be automatic. * Bandwidth Optimization/Utilization: We are able to utilize mirrors around the globe without requiring mirror admins to think twice about hosting Jigdo data, they already are hosting most of the data needed to put the image back together and have to install no additional software (as in the case of running a torrent seed.) * Official Releases: This "letter" was directed at requesting all updates be archived in some form; this bullet is about official releases. These official releases will *always* be able to be hosted via Jigdo with *very little* additional storage requirements because the Fedora and Everything trees that were composed against are exploded and hosted indefinitely.</blockquote><div> </div><div>Jigdo support will be a fantastic addition definitely. Bandwidth is very costly in my country. So, using jigdo makes a lot of sense to me. Have not yet done it just for proper knowhow. Cheers, Imtiaz </div> </div>