+1 - even so, IMO, we are already doing this :) Paulo <div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 3, 2008 5:22 AM, Mike McGrath <<a href="mailto:mmcgrath@redhat.com">mmcgrath@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I'd like to propose a formalized system for the Infrastructure team to vote. <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeMcGrath/Voting" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeMcGrath/Voting</a> I think this will make decision making a bit easier. It's possible I'm trying to fix something that isn't broken but it would still be nice to be able to tell people why things are the way they are and that a vote took place. While I take a great deal of pride in how transparent and open our team is I do, from time to time, hear complaints about us making decisions behind closed doors. I think this is mostly an educational gap but some of it is the ambiguous way we make decisions which is just kind of "ehh?" "ehh!" then stuff changes :) Thought? Comments? -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com">Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list" target="_blank"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list</a> </blockquote></div>