When to rebrand fedora?

[Bryan Kearney]

In the same way that there is a generic-logos is there any reason to not 
provide a generic-release? That way rebrandins is the following in the 
kickstart file

+generic-release
+generic-logos
-fedora-release
-fedora-logos
-fedora-release-notes

-- bk

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 14:48 -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 09:27 -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>>> a) I added package from a foreign repo that is also in fedora
>>>> (xulrunner)
>>>> b) I added packages to to the appliance from a foreign repo
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know which item (a or b) was the actual issue?
>>> Right now, both a and b are problems. We're currently trying to fix the
>>> trademark guidelines so that we're more flexible in cases like this.
>>
>> to be clear, "a" and "b" require rebranding?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> A) Because you added a package that isn't from Fedora.
> B) Because you added a package that isn't from Fedora.
> 
> ~spot
>