From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 7 07:25:44 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:25:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410070725.i977PilJ022639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-07 03:25 ------- just tried jfbterm with vga16fb. and I saw similar problem on that. perhaps this bug should be reassigned to the kernel? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 11 06:08:31 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:08:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410110608.i9B68VDr029530@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 yshao ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |UPSTREAM Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sopwith ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 6 19:51:08 2004 From: sopwith ¡÷ redhat.com (Elliot Lee) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:51:08 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] Fedora Project Mailing Lists reminder Message-ID: This is a reminder of the mailing lists for the Fedora Project, and the purpose of each list. You can view this information at http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/communicate/ When you're using these mailing lists, please take the time to choose the one that is most appropriate to your post. If you don't know the right mailing list to use for a question or discussion, please contact me. This will help you get the best possible answer for your question, and keep other list subscribers happy! Mailing Lists Mailing lists are email addresses which send email to all users subscribed to the mailing list. Sending an email to a mailing list reaches all users interested in discussing a specific topic and users available to help other users with the topic. The following mailing lists are available. To subscribe, send email to -request ¡÷ redhat.com (replace with the desired mailing list name such as fedora-list) with the word subscribe in the subject. fedora-announce-list - Announcements of changes and events. To stay aware of news, subscribe to this list. fedora-list - For users of releases. If you want help with a problem installing or using , this is the list for you. fedora-test-list - For testers of test releases. If you would like to discuss experiences using TEST releases, this is the list for you. fedora-devel-list - For developers, developers, developers. If you are interested in helping create releases, this is the list for you. fedora-docs-list - For participants of the docs project fedora-desktop-list - For discussions about desktop issues such as user interfaces, artwork, and usability fedora-config-list - For discussions about the development of configuration tools fedora-legacy-announce - For announcements about the Fedora Legacy Project fedora-legacy-list - For discussions about the Fedora Legacy Project fedora-selinux-list - For discussions about the Fedora SELinux Project fedora-de-list - For discussions about Fedora in the German language fedora-es-list - For discussions about Fedora in the Spanish language fedora-ja-list - For discussions about Fedora in the Japanese language fedora-i18n-list - For discussions about the internationalization of Fedora Core fedora-trans-list - For discussions about translating the software and documentation associated with the Fedora Project German: fedora-trans-de French: fedora-trans-fr Spanish: fedora-trans-es Italian: fedora-trans-it Brazilian Portuguese: fedora-trans-pt_br Japanese: fedora-trans-ja Korean: fedora-trans-ko Simplified Chinese: fedora-trans-zh_cn Traditional Chinese: fedora-trans-zh_tw From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 14 09:19:19 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:19:19 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410140919.i9E9JJ3R005460@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-14 05:19 ------- tried on 2.6.8-1.607. switching vt looks fine except exit bterm. when I was back from bterm and vt scroll up, it's broken a bit. but it does render correctly after switching back vt. Jeremy, how can I do test if it works on anaconda? current kernel looks much better than before. it's probably worth testing on anaconda again. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 14 09:35:12 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:35:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410140935.i9E9ZCe6006989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-14 05:35 ------- Not fixed in FC3T2. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 14 13:38:49 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:38:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410141338.i9EDcnPm016299@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From katzj ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-14 09:38 ------- I'll turn it on again for the next anaconda build. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 15 18:22:44 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:22:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410151822.i9FIMi7I014780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 rstrode ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |131589 nThis| | mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rstrode ¡÷ redhat.com |mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 15 19:06:43 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:06:43 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410151906.i9FJ6hYM023983@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 15 19:15:37 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:15:37 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410151915.i9FJFbim029644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-15-10 15:15 EST ------- Fixed in vte-0.11.11-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 02:15:13 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:15:13 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410180215.i9I2FDFB011639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 mclasen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 05:38:43 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:38:43 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410180538.i9I5chuw030933@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From llim ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-18 01:38 ------- Tested with anaconda-10.0.3.18-1.i386.rpm and bogl-bterm-0.1.18-2.i386.rpm and the machine shut down automatically after entering the NFS dir. The text rendering in traditional chinese is good though. Observation - clicked ok, after entering the NFS installation path - the screen background turn from blue to red - output the graphical card - crash ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 07:56:57 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:56:57 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 131226] gnome-terminal crashes with im-xim module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410180756.i9I7uvFc013151@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131226 llim ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |125997 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From llim ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-18 03:56 ------- Confirmed fixed. Tested with XIM input method: kinput2-canna, nabi, xcin and minichinput. Tested with IIIMF input method: Canna, hangul, xcin and chinput. Thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 15:21:51 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:21:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410181521.i9IFLp73006470@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 petersen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jturner ¡÷ redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-18 11:21 ------- *** Bug 131081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 15:23:24 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:23:24 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410181523.i9IFNOcw006853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 petersen ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |130887 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 17:31:12 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:31:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410181731.i9IHVCCn023141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From katzj ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-18 13:31 ------- So we're defitely better off now, although still not completely good. bterm linked against glibc seems fine, bterm linked against diet doesn't. Running bterm-diet and switching vts shows the same sig11 as with it in anaconda (where we use diet to build the loader) And I have a feeling that this is related to bug 134546... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 18 21:23:37 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:37 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410182123.i9ILNbfg026957@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 katzj ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From katzj ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-18 17:23 ------- With the frame buffer fixups plus the dietlibc fix for bug 134546, I think we should be good once I build anaconda again (version will be >= 10.0.3.20) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 07:24:41 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:24:41 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] New: Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410190724.i9J7OfEW014428@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 Summary: Add Japanese SJIS locale Product: Fedora Core Version: fc3test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: glibc AssignedTo: jakub ¡÷ redhat.com ReportedBy: ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com QAContact: bbrock ¡÷ redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-list ¡÷ redhat.com,fedora-ja-list ¡÷ redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 Description of problem: Add Japanese SJIS locale. Red Hat doesn't support, but the community do. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. SJIS! 2. SJIS! 3. SJIS! Actual Results: No SJIS locale Expected Results: SJIS locale Additional info: This severity should High for Japanese support. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 07:37:17 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:37:17 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410190737.i9J7bHLv018033@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 jakub ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drepper ¡÷ redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jakub ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 03:37 ------- There is a big problem with SJIS, particularly that it isn't ASCII compatible. Therefore many POSIX programs will misbehave when in SJIS locale, which is not something that we should IMHO support. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 07:45:03 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:45:03 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410190745.i9J7j3aH019544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 drepper ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From drepper ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 03:44 ------- Using a SJIS-based locale means violating standards. And beside, we only support UTF-8 locales from now on. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 12:04:29 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:04:29 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410191204.i9JC4TVh031545@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 08:04 ------- Sounds like a very dictator logic by European and American as always happened on codeset issues. Other commercial UNIXs have that SJIS locale and troublesome. Users knows them but still want SJIS locale. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 12:19:57 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:19:57 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410191219.i9JCJvZa002799@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From jakub ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 08:19 ------- Users that want to shoot themselves in the foot can do so themselves. localedef -i ja_JP -c -f SHIFT_JIS /usr/lib/locale/ja_JP.sjis will create that for them, but I don't think that is something we should promote and support. iconv(1) and iconv(3) certainly support SJIS, so if users have documents in SJIS charset, they can convert to UTF-8 (and back). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 15:04:02 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:04:02 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410191504.i9JF42IP031238@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From drepper ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 11:03 ------- > Sounds like a very dictator logic by European and American > as always happened on codeset issues. This is an issue of maintenance for the distribution. Using a non-ASCII clean locale means that various programs will just cease to work. How will pay all the wasted hour of our developers who get reports a program doesn't work and it turns out it is the fault of this locale? Arguing about other Unixes having support is irrelevant. There is no Unix in existence even today which has internationalization as complete as Linux. They simply don't have these programs. And in case of, say, Solaris there is an additional problem that they have a non-fixed wchar_t representation (in old code, they switch for new code as well) which makes it all but impossible to write correct i18n'ed software. I would appreciate if you don't use words like the above anymore since we actually know what the implications are since we actually wrote the code. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 20:27:14 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:27:14 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 127922] Mozilla's menu is not Japanese in Japanese enveronment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410192027.i9JKREfi022085@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127922 ------- Additional Comments From ronny-rhbugzilla ¡÷ vlugnet.org 2004-10-19 16:26 ------- This is mostly an upstream problems, see also other bugs about this. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 22:35:46 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:35:46 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410192235.i9JMZk39001566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From shfukuzawa ¡÷ jcom.home.ne.jp 2004-10-19 18:35 ------- > iconv(1) and iconv(3) certainly support SJIS, so if users have documents > in SJIS charset, they can convert to UTF-8 (and back). I can not find a useful convertion tool in FC3 to convert from SJIS to UTF-8... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 22:38:06 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:38:06 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410192238.i9JMc6iR002625@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From jakub ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-19 18:37 ------- Read the man page for the utility you were quoting. iconv -f SHIFT-JIS -t UTF-8 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Tue Oct 19 23:06:32 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:06:32 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410192306.i9JN6WN2009700@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From shfukuzawa ¡÷ jcom.home.ne.jp 2004-10-19 19:06 ------- I can not find iconv from GNOME's or KDE's menu. When using iconv, file name must be changed. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 20 01:18:20 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:18:20 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136437] New: kwikdisk's Japanese UI is wrong In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410200118.i9K1IKmV009017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136437 Summary: kwikdisk's Japanese UI is wrong Product: Fedora Core Version: fc3test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: kdeutils AssignedTo: than ¡÷ redhat.com ReportedBy: shfukuzawa ¡÷ jcom.home.ne.jp QAContact: benl ¡÷ redhat.com CC: fedora-ja-list ¡÷ redhat.com Description of problem: kwikdisk's Japanese UI is wrong Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kdeutils-3.3.0-2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Login on Japanese 2.Open kwikdisk 3. Actual results: Wrong Japanese UI Expected results: Correct UI Additional info: kwikdisk(kdeutils-3.2.2-3) on FC2 do not support Japanese UI ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 20 02:51:48 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:51:48 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410200251.i9K2pm81031932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From t-matsuu ¡÷ estyle.ne.jp 2004-10-19 22:51 ------- Did you check the man of iconv(1) carefully, especialy in AUTHOR section? It says "iconv is written by Ulrich Drepper as part of the GNU C Library.". iconv is included in glibc-common package. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 20 06:46:34 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:46:34 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410200646.i9K6kYbD030620@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-20 02:46 ------- rawhide-20041019 should contains those fixes, right? signal 11 was still occurred when I switched vt, though. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 20 17:13:46 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:13:46 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410201713.i9KHDklx003197@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-20 13:13 ------- >This is an issue of maintenance for the distribution. Using a >non-ASCII clean locale means that various programs will just cease to >work. How will pay all the wasted hour of our developers who get >reports a program doesn't work and it turns out it is the fault of >this locale? Adding SJIS locale doesn't mean directly that you need accept and fix all SJIS among applications. There should be what our developers should and what they should not. Just rejecting SJIS locales will get rid of any chances. Don't skew open source freedom by just your unwillingness. >Arguing about other Unixes having support is irrelevant. There is no >Unix in existence even today which has internationalization as >complete as Linux. They simply don't have these programs. And in >case of, say, Solaris there is an additional problem that they have a >non-fixed wchar_t representation (in old code, they switch for new >code as well) which makes it all but impossible to write correct >i18n'ed software. Stop messing around. Linux is just the best implemented the incomplete international standards, ignoring many imoportant domestic issues. There are many UNIXs with much better Japanese support than Linux. Even there were versions of Japanese by Japanese for Japanese. Why can you glibc is enough and ready for real Japanese already? When migrating from other unices to Linux, SJIS is the biggest problem. Wnen migrating from Windows to Linux, SJIS is the biggest problem. Your opinion is like that of who are enjoying to wath other people's fatal suffers through TV, sitting in the comfortable, safty rooms in a far distance. >I would appreciate if you don't use words like the above anymore since >we actually know what the implications are since we actually wrote the >code. Sorry, just learned from your mails before. I don't bow to the dictator. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 21 01:49:02 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:49:02 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410210149.i9L1n2rW032048@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 llim ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From llim ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-20 21:48 ------- Tried with anaconda-10.0.3.21-1, signal 11 still occurred for me when I switched vt. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 21 02:56:13 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:56:13 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410210256.i9L2uD57007864@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 katzj ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From katzj ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-20 22:56 ------- You need a tree with anaconda >= 10.1.0 due to a series of silliness... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 21 18:40:51 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:40:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410211840.i9LIeptg022380@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 gotom ¡÷ debian.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|bbrock ¡÷ redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From gotom ¡÷ debian.or.jp 2004-10-21 14:40 ------- I couldn't understand why you guys insist to support ja_JP.SJIS locale. I guess you want to use SJIS for text convertion (use iconv, nkf), or use SJIS on filesystem (use mount option). But why do you want to use ja_JP.SJIS _environment_? ja_JP.SJIS locale is broken for unix environment. Most Japanese locale developers do not consider about ja_JP.SJIS locale for daily processing because SJIS is not suitable for unix environment. We have tested for ja_JP.ujis, ja_JP.eucJP, ja_JP.EUC-JP, and ja_JP.UTF-8. However ja_JP.SJIS (and ja_JP.ISO-2022-JP variants) are out of scope. Only the thing I heard about using ja_JP.SJIS is to handle SJIS on xmms. But I think it's just local hack for that user, and I doubt it's usable for everyone (and read comments; it's not). I think it's useful that you check whether ja_JP.SJIS is usable or not, and which part violates POSIX behavior before complaining, because no one has tested and collected it, IIRC. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 21 18:45:31 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:45:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for CJK install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410211845.i9LIjVvJ024544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 tagoh ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Component|bogl |anaconda Fixed In Version| |10.1.0.0-1 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-21 14:45 ------- I've tested rawhide-20041021, and bogl works fine on both 1st stage of TUI and GUI even if I switched vts. also, on 2nd stage, TUI installer works on bogl, and GUI installer was realized properly. Thanks Jeremy! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 21 18:54:59 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:54:59 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410211854.i9LIsxQG029008@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From numberR ¡÷ gmail.com 2004-10-21 14:54 ------- i agree with GOTO Masanori. as long as sjis breaks many POSIX programs and redhat/fedora have a lot of POSIX programs installed, how redhat/fedora can support such encoding type? it's not about a dictator ship, but an implementation of sjis. however, i understand that there are people who want to use sjis, but as stated on comment #4, you still can set your locale to whatever you want. even sjis. compatibility is important, but moving forward to utf-8 is really important as well. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 22 01:25:55 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:25:55 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 120494] wrong fonts are used on GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410220125.i9M1Ptus017949@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494 llch ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From llch ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-21 21:25 ------- Saw 1.1.2-10 in fc2 updates. Thanks Dan. Closing this bug. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 22 16:18:29 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:18:29 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410221618.i9MGITbZ025856@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-22 12:18 ------- You might disagree, and anybody else might disagree too, but for me, your opinions are the Japanese typical empty follow-ups which just repeat the previous major (and winner's) comments. I put a interesting number here from Google: ja_JP.eucJP: 28600 ja_JP.UTF-8: 6100 ja_JP.sjis: 7270 Those numbers are not fair enough, but can be an objective evidence that sjis locale is not for crazies. But inspite of my expectations, SJIS locale issue is already over unless somebody else insist as a member of the community. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we should discuss on the other place even if the conclusion is same, because bugzilla is not a sales tool... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Sat Oct 23 20:51:47 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:51:47 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410232051.i9NKplCN032615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From numberR ¡÷ gmail.com 2004-10-23 16:51 ------- many people using sjis doesn't necessary mean they are not crazy. However, i agree with Yukihiro Nakai that he wants to support sjis in order to migrate people to linux, but if you want to talk about that kind of stuff, that is not a community problem anymore, but a business strategy of redhat in japan, which i have nothing to do with. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Mon Oct 25 06:00:13 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:00:13 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136290] Add Japanese SJIS locale In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410250600.i9P60D9d005546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136290 ------- Additional Comments From rees ¡÷ ddcom.co.jp 2004-10-25 02:00 ------- I know this is officially CLOSED, NOTFIX, but this needs to be said by a foreigner who understands the problem. I have no fond feelings for shift-JIS. I have written code to parse it, so I know how broken the encoding scheme is. However, the numbers Nakai quotes don't tell even one percent of the story. You simply aren't going to find business documents encoded in ja_JP.eucJP. Business documents encoded in ja_JP.UTF-8 exist, but not where even your ordinary geek is going to find them. I personally don't see non-shifted JIS business documents in a typical day in the almost typical Japanese IT business office where I work, and those are at least an order of magnitude more common than documents in ja_JP.UTF-8. Japanese implies shift-JIS in the desktop world. There is no way to shoehorn shift-JIS support into the suit-and-tie RedHat Linux distributions without pumping it through Fedora. That's why it is not just a business-side issue. If you want Japanese people to be able to use Linux on the desktop, you have to understand that Linux shall support shift-JIS before it succeeds on the Japanese desktop. Frankly, any application that can only deal with UTF-8 has a high probability of not really dealing properly with UTF-8. (In other words, those are broken in the Japanese context any way you look at it.) I know that the only way to do this is to go beyond the standards the Unicode Consortium has given us, and to look hard where Microsoft is saying, "nothing here, move on". It will require a parallel standard of suggested internal encodings, I suppose, so that we can mathematically convert between the local version locales using local encodings and the international version locales using Unicode. But it has to be done sometime. Sorry to be so pointy headed in a bug report, but there is no way to understand the bug without the context. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Wed Oct 27 15:47:45 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 136437] kwikdisk's Japanese UI is wrong In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410271547.i9RFljOO012982@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136437 than ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From than ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-27 11:47 ------- it's fixed in kdeutils-3.3.1-2.1, which will be pushed out after FC3 released ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 28 07:15:27 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:15:27 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 128134] OpenOffice.org displays incorrect menu on Japanese enveronment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410280715.i9S7FRpS010184@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128134 caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-28 03:15 ------- Should be fixed in 1.1.2-10, closing duplicates ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 28 07:16:05 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:16:05 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122216] No menu (string) is shown on OpenOffice.org applications in Japanese mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410280716.i9S7G547010292@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122216 caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-28 03:15 ------- Should be fixed in 1.1.2-10, closing duplicates ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Thu Oct 28 07:16:30 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:16:30 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 123297] Menu is translated but unspeakably broken In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410280716.i9S7GUrb010356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123297 caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From caolanm ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-28 03:16 ------- Should be fixed in 1.1.2-10, closing duplicates ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 29 11:16:49 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:16:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 137534] New: Wrong char width for Japanese ideographs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410291116.i9TBGnhh006698@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137534 Summary: Wrong char width for Japanese ideographs Product: Fedora Core Version: test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: emacs AssignedTo: petersen ¡÷ redhat.com ReportedBy: ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-list ¡÷ redhat.com,fedora-ja-list ¡÷ redhat.com Description of problem: Full-width qoute char's width is wrong in Emacs by default, So .emacs or other emacs settings needs the appropriate addition. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add full width quote word to Canna dict. 2. Run emacs. 3. Input full width quote word into emacs through Canna. Actual results: Half width Expected results: Full Width Additional info: http://d.hatena.ne.jp/rna/20041027#p2 (Japanese) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Fri Oct 29 11:20:38 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:20:38 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 137534] Wrong char width for Japanese ideographs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410291120.i9TBKcCN007539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137534 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ¡÷ redhat.com 2004-10-29 07:20 ------- Created an attachment (id=105933) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=105933&action=view) Diff for lang-coding-systems-init.el This language setting file include all languages settings. Previous language settings were separated by each language. I wonder why you unified them while Red Hat splitted input method settings in /etc/X11/xinit/xinit.d/ for each langauge. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com Sun Oct 31 02:05:22 2004 From: bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com (bugzilla ¡÷ redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:05:22 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 137534] Wrong char width for Japanese ideographs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200410310205.i9V25Mdb027109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137534 ------- Additional Comments From rna ¡÷ horobi.com 2004-10-30 22:05 ------- 'ascii must be on top of the list, or you can't input '\'(backslash). And complete charset list would be better. (un-define-change-charset-order (list 'ascii 'japanese-jisx0208 'japanese-jisx0212 'katakana-jisx0201 'latin-iso8859-1 'latin-iso8859-2 'latin-iso8859-3 'latin-iso8859-4 'cyrillic-iso8859-5 'greek-iso8859-7 'hebrew-iso8859-8 'latin-iso8859-9 'latin-iso8859-14 'latin-iso8859-15 'ipa 'chinese-gb2312 'chinese-cns11643-1 'chinese-cns11643-2 'chinese-cns11643-3 'chinese-cns11643-4 'chinese-cns11643-5 'chinese-cns11643-6 'chinese-cns11643-7 'chinese-big5-1 'chinese-big5-2 'korean-ksc5601 'latin-jisx0201 'thai-tis620 'ethiopic 'indian-is13194 'chinese-sisheng 'lao 'vietnamese-viscii-lower 'vietnamese-viscii-upper 'mule-unicode-0100-24ff 'mule-unicode-2500-33ff 'mule-unicode-e000-ffff 'mule-ucs-unicode-multichar)) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.