<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.9"> </HEAD> <BODY> Hi, I'd go along with the RH10 comment. Ran it for about a week in 32 bit mode, no problems or crashes. Some nice tweaks on the GUI for example the graphical boot up, and I notice that the video setup now supports my nVidia twin-head and dual screen configurations. (RH9 didn't!) Also, yes, my wishlist of additional software now seems to be included ... <IMG SRC="cid:1071109070.21137.69.camel@gareth.bult.co.uk" ALIGN="middle" ALT=":)" BORDER="0"> HTH Gareth. On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 02:06, Mike Thrift wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <PRE>So, I'm a little confused, but trying to get everything understood. How stable is FC1? I read the interview on linuxquestions.org and I thought Jeremy said it is as stable as RH10 would be, is this the case? Also, what are the base packages based on, did they just take Shrike and throw it to the fedora project, or is this just a completely different distro utilizing latest versions of software? I haven't had a ton of time to look around, and I appreciate any info anybody can provide. TIA!! Mike. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: <A HREF="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</A></PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> <PRE><TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%"> <TR> <TD> -- Gareth Bult <<A HREF="mailto:Gareth@Bult.co.uk">Gareth@Bult.co.uk</A>> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> </PRE> </BODY> </HTML>