<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Hmmm, I can't find a reference to 2.4 in the link. So if it is true that it is referring to 2.4 as well, does that mean there is no difference between the updates kernel-2.4.22-1.2174.nptl.athlon.rpm and a kernel-2.4.22-1.2174.nptl.i686.rpm? Don Dixon <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fedora-list_me_no_like_spam@macrologic.com">fedora-list_me_no_like_spam@macrologic.com</a> Ben Stringer wrote: <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid1078716565.22919.1.camel@localhost.localdomain"> <pre wrap="">On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:12, Christopher K. Johnson wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Not a problem. See <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://people.redhat.com/%7Earjanv/2.6/readme.txt">http://people.redhat.com/%7Earjanv/2.6/readme.txt</a> which includes this note: "I no longer build athlon kernels because in theory the 2.6 kernel now has a mechanism to automatically runtime patch in these optimisations during boot" </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> The OP referred to the 2.4 kernel series. Cheers, Ben </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>