<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body> Rebuilding package from src.rpm is very simple: 1. rpm -i packg.src.rpm [2. edit /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec] 3. rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/packg.spec [--clean] [--target=athlon e.g.] 4. rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/athlon/packg.rpm Done. michalz Michele Schiavo wrote: <blockquote cite="mid36061D8A90E4CF4CA8A028DA4BF578BC03BF1C@srv001.4wdGROUP.local" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> Message: 1 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:16:27 +0100 From: Michal Zeravik <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:michalz@olomouc.com"><michalz@olomouc.com></a> Subject: Re: RPM i386 vs i686 performance </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">To: For users of Fedora Core releases <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com"><fedora-list@redhat.com></a> Message-ID: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:406070EB.60909@olomouc.com"><406070EB.60909@olomouc.com></a> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Chris and others, I can't measure window desktop response time, but It seems to be faster than original packages. I'm sorry, I know this is subjective. But graphical desktop seems run faster on my athlon-xp when I've rebuild X and KDE. Also memory consuming is much fewer with rebuilded custom kernel than original (or atrpms) one. System is more fresh I think. But I have no numbers, sorry. Give it a try ... michal </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> It's too difficult rebuild X from SRPM ? Can you write something ? So i'll try Thank's Michele Schiavo </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>