<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Mitsuho Iizuka wrote: <blockquote cite="mid20050127.173725.74747622.m-iizuka@cp.jp.nec.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">From: Amy M <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:amymom@hawaiilinux.us"><amymom@hawaiilinux.us></a> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory! Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:41:35 -1000 </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">(3) While Windows can be very snappy when fresh, it is notorios for showing gravely deteriorated performance after time, especially after you have installed a number of applications. With FC, thanks largely to the free upgrades, its performace actually goes up with time. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> * Just curious, Windows still deploys all on memory or swap style virtual memory management other than paging on demand style. (excuse me if i'm wrong) </pre> </blockquote> No that is not true. Though I am not an expert on Windows internals, but I do know that Windows memory management utilizes both physical memory and paging memory. <blockquote cite="mid20050127.173725.74747622.m-iizuka@cp.jp.nec.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> * FC1 was a little bit faster ;-( </pre> </blockquote> Yah! I quite agree with that. </body> </html>