<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Edward Yang wrote: <blockquote cite="mid41F8E921.70108@fastmail.fm" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> Rahul Sundaram wrote: <blockquote cite="midc79487d6050127050561d480a7@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hi </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> I just found out that on FC3 Borland C++Builder takes more than 400mb memory! While on Windows, it only takes a little more than 60mb.This is making me believe that System Monitor is having a bug about calculating memory size... </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> fedora does not ship borland c++. if borland generated bloated code on fedora, how is that a fedora problem? </pre> </blockquote> It's C++BuilderX, which uses Java to drive its graphical IDE. It's the Java thing that takes up more than 400mb memory. Can anyone have C++BuilderX installed on FC3 confirm that they also have the same result? </blockquote> The JavaVM for Linux is less than perfect and in fact pretty much (in your terms) suck when compared to the Windows counterpart... Using Java programs in Linux is too expensive (in my experience) in terms of memory and CPU resources... My suggestion... Don't use them. Or if you must, you know what are the trade offs of using them. </body> </html>