<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.3.2"> </HEAD> <BODY> I have heard that OO is written in Java too! And I believed, because OO is so damn slow indeed :( On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:13 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <PRE> ----- Original Message ----- From: <<A HREF="mailto:akonstam@trinity.edu">akonstam@trinity.edu</A>> To: "James Mckenzie" <<A HREF="mailto:jjmckenzie51@earthlink.net">jjmckenzie51@earthlink.net</A>>; "For users of Fedora Core releases" <<A HREF="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</A>> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:11 AM Subject: Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory! > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:57:11AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote: >> > > > James Mckenzie wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > I don't have those two options in jdk.config. I do find the following >> > options in cbulder.config: >> > >> > vmparam -Xms32m >> Minumum memory per load: 32MB >> > vmparam -Xmx256m >> Maximum memory per load: 256MB >> > >> > So I wonder why the JVM instance invoked by CBX takes up more than >> > 400mb memory? >> > >> This looks like a problem with either Java or Cbuilder and definately not >> LINUX or FC. >> > But I hear from the usual unreliable sources that OpenOffice is > written in Java. So if OpenOffice is part of Fedora it seems to me its > a Fedora problem also. There is no question in my experience that an > installation of everything thing in the FC3 (or even FC2) > distribution) leads to a bloated system. And saying XP systems after > SP2 are also bloated does not make me feel better. I haven't heard that OO is written in Java. Even if it is - one third-party application does not make the whole distro suck. Thomas </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> </BODY> </HTML>